MAKE VS BUY WEEK 10 ILLUSTRATIVE QUESTIONS Q 11.2 Maxitank makes two products. Its costs are: Product R Product S Selling price $12 $20 Materials $4 $11 Labour hours 2 4 Machine hours 4 3 Maxitank’s sales are limited by the bottleneck (machine) capacity of the factory. Which of the two products should be produced first in order to maximize the throughput contribution generated from the limited capacity? Solution 11.2 Product R Product S Selling price $12 $20 Materials $4 $11 Throughput contribution $8 $9 Machine hours 4 3 Return per machine hour $2 $3 Ranking 2 1 Labour hours are irrelevant for throughput VARIATION TO Q11.2 Maxitanks’ cost of labour is now included: Product R Product S Selling price $12 $20 Materials $4 $11 Labour cost $2 $5 Labour hours 2 4 Which of the two products should be produced first in order to maximize the profits generated from the limited capacity, taking material and labour costs into account? Solution 11.2 Product R Product S Selling price $12 $20 Materials $4 $11 Labour $2 $5 Contribution $6 $4 Labour hours 2 4 Return per machine hour $3 $1 Ranking 1 2 Q 11.5 Harrison products capacity is 20,000 units per year. Their results for last year are: Sales 12,000 units @ $100 Variable costs Contribution margin Fixed costs Profit $1,200,000 588,000 612,000 245,000 $367,000 Harrison expects its regular sales next year to be 15,000 units. They also expect fixed costs to increase by $100,000. A foreign distributor has offered to buy a guaranteed 8,000 units at $95 per unit next year and the company can produce on the maximum capacity. Should Harrison accept this offer? SOLUTION 11.5 Regular sales Sales 15,000 units @ $100 Sales 12,000 @ $100 plus 8,000 @ $95 Special order $1,500,000 $1,200,000 760,000 Variable costs 15,000 @ $49 20,000 @ $49 735,000 Contribution margin 765,000 980,000 Fixed costs 345,000 345,000 $420,000 $635,000 Profit 980,000 OPERATING DECISIONS & RELEVANT COSTS Relevant costs are those that are relevant to a particular decision. Relevant costs are the future, incremental cash flows that result from a decision Sunk costs are not relevant Relevant costs are avoidable costs. Unavoidable costs are not relevant because, irrespective of what a decision is, unavoidable costs will still be incurred Relevant costs may be opportunity costs the loss of a future cash flow that takes place as a result of making a particular decision APPLYING RELEVANT COSTS Make versus buy: Outsourcing decisions Equipment replacement Fixed costs are not relevant Sunk costs and depreciation are not relevant Relevant cost of materials Material purchased specifically - relevant cost is the purchase price Material already in stock and used regularly relevant cost is the replacement price Material already in stock but surplus - relevant cost is the opportunity cost Higher of scrap value or its value in any alternative use RELEVANT COSTS: MAKE V. BUY Table 11.4: Relevant costs - make versus buy Stationery 10,000 @ $0.50 Labour 10,000 @ $2 Share of depreciation costs Outsourcing cost Total relevant cost Cost to make 5 ,0 0 0 Cost to buy 20,000 10,000 $35,000 10,000 20,000 $30,000 Table 11.5: Relevant costs - make versus buy – simplified Stationery 10,000 @ $0.50 Labour 10,000 @ $2 Outsourcing cost Total relevant cost Relevant cost to make 5 ,0 0 0 Relevant cost to buy 20,000 $25,000 20,000 $20,000 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT Table 11.6: Relevant costs – equipment replacement Retain old kitchen Purchase price of new kitchen Trade-in value of old machine Operating costs $40,000 p.a x 5 years $30,000 p.a. x 5 years Additional income from dining of $25,000 p.a. x 5 years Total relevant cost Buy new kitchen -$150,000 +$25,000 -$200,000 -$150,000 +$125,000 -$200,000 -$150,000 Q 12.4 Cirrus Company has calculated that the cost to make a component is made up of materials $120, labour $60, variable overhead $30 and fixed overhead of $25. Another company has offered to make the component for $140. If the company has spare capacity and wishes to retain its skilled labour force, should it make or buy the component?