Welcome to MECH 6251/485 Space Flight Dynamics and Propulsion Systems Instructor: Dr. Hoi Dick Ng Affiliation: Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Concordia University Room: EV 004.229 Tel: (514) 848-2424 ext 3177 E-mail: hoing@mie.concordia.ca Apollo Saturn V Course website: http://users.encs.concordia.ca/~hoing/Teaching/MECH6251/mech6251.html Welcome to MECH 6251/485 Space Flight Dynamics and Propulsion Systems Objective Make you becoming a “ROCKET SCIENTIST”! • Analyze the performance of an ideal rocket engine. • Select propellants and rocket propulsion systems based on mission requirements. • Perform thermo-chemical calculations to determine the rocket chamber temperature and chemical composition for any propellant combination. • Design a liquid propellant rocket engine, a solid propellant rocket motor and a hybrid rocket motor by considering different factors such as propellant combination, burning rate laws, combustion chamber, injector, igniter, nozzle, heat transfer and cooling characteristics Welcome to MECH 6251/485 Space Flight Dynamics and Propulsion Systems Objective Make you becoming a “ROCKET SCIENTIST”! Main topics: • Introduction and classification of space propulsion systems • Rocket fundamentals • Ideal rocket design and optimization • Flight dynamics (orbital mechanics) • Chemical propellant rocket performance analysis • Solid, liquid and hybrid propellant rocket motors • Propellants and combustion • Advanced topics and trends in space propulsion system design Welcome to MECH 6251/485 Space Flight Dynamics and Propulsion Systems Pre-requisite This course is an application based course which uses fundamental principles to design space propulsion systems: • Newtonian dynamics • thermodynamics • Chemistry • fluid mechanics • heat transfer *MECH 6111 Gas dynamics Welcome to MECH 6251/485 Space Flight Dynamics and Propulsion Systems Required text G.P. Sutton and O. Biblarz, Rocket Propulsion Elements, 7th or 8th edition, Wiley Each week: Reading assignment of different chapters Welcome to MECH 6251/485 Space Flight Dynamics and Propulsion Systems Midterm quiz Research project Final exam 20% 20% 50% Propulsion system: Present, and Future Present: study the fundamental and current knowledge on space flight mechanics and rocket propulsion systems Atlas II/III Future: Research on any advanced space propulsion systems Research Project Students will carry out a research project related to the space science and space propulsion system. The purpose of the project is to provide students with an opportunity to carry out an open-ended project work and to present it in an acceptable form. The format of the project may consist of the following: 1. A theoretical study of an engineering problem/mission related to space propulsion. 2. A design and/or development project 3. A case study 4. An ordered and critical exposition of the literature on an appropriate topic in space engineering. 5. Review of a “classical” journal paper The final submission of the research project should be in the form of a technical report. Teams must present a project proposal (max. 2 pages + 10 mins presentation) in October (tentatively on Oct. 8, 2012). Concordia University Class 2012 Design of a single stage hybrid sounding rocket Hybrid (Solid/Liquid) propulsion system Gemini VIII - Updated analysis and recreation of mission Pre-design of the propulsion of a space elevator’s climber Hypersonic spaceplane propulsion platforms A case study on intercontinental ballistics missiles (ICBM) Case study on challenger space shuttle A journey to Mars Concordia University Quad Chart Source: http://www.canis.uiuc.edu/ Concordia University Electric Propulsion System – An Innovative Technology for Future Human Space Cruise Space Flight Dynamics and Propulsion Systems (MECH 7221) Farhana Anjum (ID 5343534), Zayed Takdir Mahmud (ID 9204350) ME Dept., Concordia University, Montreal, QC Electric Propulsion Rocket Equation M 0 M b exp V gc I sp M0 Mb M p M b M dry M payload Cheating the assumption about rocket equation Interstellar space mission is not possible with current technologies due to extremely high launched and mission travel cost Design space craft issues: Less mass means less propellant Mission ΔV is 2 or 3 times the propulsion’s exhaust velocity or equivalently impulse Isp with current chemical propulsion technologies Need new ground-breaking technologies: less propellant high speed Electric Propulsion is evolving as an innovative propulsion system for interstellar space mission Main Principle of Electric Propulsion System •Source of Energy: Electric Power Nuclear, Solar Radiation, Batteries •Energize propellant to give much higher Isp than chemical reaction •Reduce propellant mass for a given ΔV change increase M0/Mb ratio All propellant being used is carried onboard the vehicle currently Instead use: solar thermal energy, solar electric power systems, solar sails, propellant mass from extra-terrestrial resources Don’t need to carry everything with rocket from launched station earth Collect energy, materials, etc. as on travel Choose advanced rocket propulsion technologies based on their impacts on the rocket equation: all seek to increase Isp Advanced Propulsion technology to emphasize on Isp Challenges and Opportunities •No energy limit: large energy from external solar or nuclear electric system Isp can be order of Magnitude than chemical system •It is power limited deliverable external energy rate ∞ Power sys. Mass •Limiting thrust to vehicle mass low T/W vehicles larger thrust •Operable from hours to years ultimately buildup larger total impulse • Solar electric propulsion systems consist of: (a) Power system (solar or nuclear), (b) Power Conditioning, (c) Thruster, (d) Propellant storage, and •Provide significant mass savings higher Isp (e) Feed subsystem •Trip time benefits: complicated interplay T/W and local gravity field •Thrusters: (1) Electrothermal, • (2) Electrostatic, and (3) Electromagnetic •Power: From the Sunlight or nuclear reactor Solar photon electricity by solar cells low efficiency; Nuclear: Thermal energy electricity by static or dynamic thermal2electric power conversion high efficiency •Heliocentric space medium T/W compare to solar gravitation •Much higher terminal velocity reduce trip time •Use less propellant mass high ΔV short trip time trajectory •Suitable for outer planet for long run time for future human space cruise A Journey Into Space Jun 10th 2008 Book your ticket now! Technology Spaceship • Air launched from mother ship at 15 km altitude and 215 km/h • Single hybrid rocket motor (liquid N2O, HTPB rubber solid fuel) • Unpowered landing. Glides back • Feathering: provides high stability and drag to decelerate vehicle • No heat shield or ceramic tiles for re-entry Thru st 73.5 kN Total M 3600 kg Mach 3 Isp 250 sec Payload 400 kg Bell nozzle A/At 25 Burn t 80 sec Mass flow rate 30 kg/s Po 24 bar Impacts Conclusions • Currently Russian Space Agency leading the field •Challenges: • Virgin Galactic is 1st world spaceline. Privately funded spaceship • Marketing space tourism to the general public • Space vehicle that makes a suborbital flight (120 km altitude) • Medical limitations for non-professionals • Total flight time in space of 6 mins. 3 passengers on board • Larger spaceship, longer flight times and achieving higher altitudes for orbital flight • Medical exam and Training needed for participants •Project Estimates: •Human interest in space, uniqueness of experience, status symbol • Trip cost/passenger: $200,000 •Advantages: • Development cost: $30 million -Advances in technology - Source of funding for R&D •Disadvantages: - High cost • Estimated development time: 3 years •Future of space tourism: - Safety issues/accidents Company: Space Journeys Inc. -Probable health effects 2008 Engineering R&D 2009 Manufacturing 2010 Testing 2011 Main Flights • Lunar travel for 1 week trip. Space hotels Contact: Aisha Manderson & Redha Khezzar, Design Engineers Email: r_khezzar@sji.com Phone: (514) 622 33 67 How to do well in this intensive course? • Review your basic engineering subjects (e.g. newtonian mechanics, thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, gasdynamics, heat transfer) • Study class lectures, read the textbook/literature • Read literature and develop an interest in the subject. • Do the homework • Discuss and collaborate with your colleagues Most important, ENJOY this course Concordia University Introduction and classification of space propulsion systems Objectives • Types of propulsion systems • Historical perspective • Classification of different rockets types Reading: The road to space by Gruntman Sutton and Biblarz Chapter 1 What is propulsion Dictionary definition: The action or process of propelling, changing the motion of a body. Newton’s third laws of motion •“For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.” - Isaac Newton, 1687 Propulsion mechanism: A reaction force is imparted to a device by the momentum of ejected matter Example: A monkey sits on a “space” wagon, and throws bananas out the back of the wagon. The act of throwing the bananas in one direction causes the wagon to be propelled in the opposite direction. Rocket vs. Air-breathing jet propulsion • Differ in the working fluid/matter Jet propulsion engine: (MECH 6171) • Terrestrial system • Use the surrounding medium as the “working fluid” and chemical energy addition to generate thrust (propulsion). • Air breathing device: only the fuel is carried on board. The majority of the thrust in an airbreathing engine is generated by the ambient air, Rocket propulsion system: (this course) • A rocket is a device that produces thrust by ejecting matter (propellant mass) that are carried or stored on board. Lockheed Martin Historical perspective The past … Reading: The Road to Space – The first thousand years by Mike Gruntman, University of Southern California, LA, California. Who was the first? Earliest Rockets – China or India (related to the discovery of black or “gun” powder) The “Three Amigos” of spaceflight theory American • Robert Goddard German physicist • Hermann Oberth • Konstantin Tsiolkovsky Polish • Founding fathers of rocketry and astronautics • Independent and parallel development of Rocket theory Konstantin Tsiolkovsky 1857 - 1935 • Deaf Russian School Teacher - fascinated with space flight, started by writing Science Fiction Novels • Discovered that practical space flight depended on liquid fuel rockets in the 1890’s • Famous for development of “Rocket Equation” in 1897 • Calculated escape velocity, minimum orbital velocity, benefit of equatorial launch, and benefit of multi-stage rockets • Excellent theory, Not well published, not as important as he could have been Robert H. Goddard 1882 - 1945 • Also a loner, developed rocket theory in 1909-1910 • an experimenter, actually building and testing liquid fuel rockets (first flight in 1926) • In a report to his sponsors (Smithsonian Institute) in 1920, he described a rocket trip to the moon. This subjected him to ridicule since the common belief was still that a rocket needed air to push against • Goddard ended with 214 patents covering details of rocket design Robert Goddard with his original rocket system Hermann Oberth 1894 - 1989 • His 1923 book: Die Rakete zu den Planetenraumen (The Rocket into Planetary Space) covered the entire spectrum of manned and unmanned rocket flight. • Because it was published and widely read, he had more influence on the growth of rocket concepts then either of the others. His book spawned several rocket societies in Germany, significantly the German Rocket society, out of which the German army recruited Werner Von Braun in 1932 and started the project which produced the V2 bomb or rocket. The V2 (Vergeltung – Vengeance) • Challenge was to deliver a one ton warhead • Final design: 2300 lb warhead, 47 ft long, 5.4 ft diameter, 28,229 lb takeoff weight. 59,500 lb thrust for 68 seconds. • 6400 weapon launches • The Americans got Von Braun and 117 other scientists, and about 100 rockets. The Soviets got the facilities and about the same number of rockets. • 60 plus V2’s were launched in the late 40’s in US. All were sub-orbital, highest altitude was 244 miles V-2 Rocket First Operational System Rocket applications • Both the Soviets and the US built sub-orbital rockets in the late 1940’s, 50’s and 60’s • Sounding (research) rockets instrument-carrying device to take measurements and perform scientific experiments during its sub-orbital flight • Spacecraft (satellite) Launchers • Intercontinental ballistic missiles with the increasing capabilities in accuracy, range and payload (warhead) weight • Manned space flight (space vehicle for specific missions) First satellite launchers Russia (Soviet Union) • Sputnik - SS-6/R7 - 217,000 lbs thrust - 2900 lbs to LEO USA • Explorer I - Jupiter C rocket – 75000 lbs thrust – 20 lbs to LEO R7 Semiorka Rocket Manned space flight • Yuri Gagarin, April 12, 1961 … • Modified R-7 Launcher • Liftoff Thrust: 870,000 lbf • Payload to LEO: 10,000 lbm The first human in space and the first to orbit the Earth Manned space flight • Alan Shepard, Mercury 3 … May 5, 1961 Redstone rocket (Freedom 7 spacecraft ) • Liftoff Thrust: 80,000 lbf • Payload to LEO : 0 • USA is still Way behind • John Glenn, Mercury 6 … Feb. 20, 1962 Launch vehicle, Atlas-D • Liftoff Thrust: 360,000 lbf • Payload to LEO : 3100 lbm • USA starting to catch up Manned space flight • Gemini 3 - Titan II • First Flight March 23 1965 • Liftoff Thrust: 430,000 lbf • Payload to LEO : 7000 lbm • Still behind R-7 • Apollo Saturn 1-B • First Flight October 11, 1968 • Liftoff Thrust: 1.64 M lbf • Payload to LEO : 41,000 lbm • Third most powerful rocket ever flown Manned space flight • Apollo Saturn V • First Flight December 21, 1968 (manned orbit of the moon) • Liftoff Thrust: 7.7 M lbf • Payload to LEO : 260,000 lbm • Lunar payload capable • most powerful rocket ever flown Other nations followed (Modern launchers) Indian Japanese European Chinese “The first thousand years of roketry brought us spectacular successes, and we reached the comsmos. The next 1000 years will be more exciting”. - Gruntman - space station - Mission to Mars - toward the outer space