Paper 49-PPS

advertisement

AUSTRALIAN

PERSPECTIVE OF

TRANSPORTATION AND

TAXATION :

A R ELATIONSHIP BUT NO M ARRIAGE

PRAFULA PEARCE, LECTURER, SCHOOL OF

BUSINESS LAW & TAXATION, CURTIN

UNIVERSITY

INTRODUCTION

Is there a relationship between transportation and tax policy in

Australia

Is a change in tax policy required to promote the use of more fuel efficient vehicles and reduce its use?

OUTLINE

Liquid fuel problem

Australian transport policy and growth of private vehicles

Australian tax policy and its influence on transportation choices

Tax policy change

Proposed Luxury Energy Tax

LIQUID FUEL PROBLEM

OIL RESERVES REPORTED FROM SELECTED

AGENCIES

NAME OF

REPORTING

AGENCY

Oil and Gas Journal

TIMING

Jan 2009

BILLION BARRELS

(Gb)

1342

World Oil

EIA

Year end 2007

2008

1184

1241

BP Statistical Review June 2009

ABARE End of 2008

1258

1408

Source: Owen, Inderwildi & King (2010)

ABARE: World – 42 years of proven oil reserves

Australia: 10 years of crude oil; 31 years of condensate and 20 years of LPG

AUSTRALIAN TRANSPORT POLICY

Transportation falls within the jurisdiction of States.

Feb 2008: Australian transport Council

Ministers – National transport policy framework.

Objectives: Promote efficient and sustainable movement of people and goods; minimise emissions and consumption of resources and energy

REGISTERED CARS AND STATION

WAGONS

TRAVEL TO WORK OR STUDY

CARS: POWER AND WEIGHT

Car Model Year Engine Power/

Litres Weight KW/tonne

Performance

0/100km

20 Holden FX Nov 1948 2.15

45/1012=

44.46

Holden

HD

Feb 1965 2.45

86/1216=

70.72

Holden HJ July 1974 3.3

96/1338=

71.75

Holden VL Mar 1986 3.00

114/1250=

91.20

Holden VE July 2008 3.6

180/1700=

105.88

13.2

13.1

7.04

8.6

AUSTRALIAN TAX POLICY

AUSTRALIAN TAX REVENUES

2009/10

Australia’s future tax system: Final Report: Overview

CALTAX PETROL PRICE AT 12 JUNE 2009

IMPACT OF CURRENT TAXES ON

FUEL CONSUMPTION BY MOTORISTS

PRRT and Crude oil excise: Tax on profits – no impact on motorists

Fuel Excise: Inelastic – use declines1.5% with 10% increase in fuel price.

FBT: Statutory formula imposes less tax with more driving

LCT: Tax based on cost of car, not consumption of fuel

HENRY REVIEW

RECOMMENDATIONS

Abolish LCT

Replace vehicle registration tax with road user charge

Introduce congestion tax

Recommendations will promote national transportation policy.

TAX POLICY CHANGEOTHER

COUNTRIES

UK and Ireland: Car purchase taxes based on

CO2 emissions

Netherlands: Introduced charge per km driven tax starting in 2012 starting at 3 Euro per km.

Use GPS device.

Oregon: Process of developing road user fee. Task

Force in 2001 recommended road user fee and congestion charge using fuel pump station to collect the charge using vehicle detection device and central reader.

LUXURY ENERGY TAX (LET)

My recommendation: Introduce Luxury

Energy Tax imposed on purchase and use based on power and weight of vehicle.

It has the potential to include road user charge and congestion tax.

Will bring about education that energy is a luxury.

It has potential to change motor manufacturer and buyer’s habits to seek lower power to weight vehicles.

PRINCIPLES OF LET

LET charged to registered owner of vehicle at 4 levels:

- Initial purchase

- Annual registration

- Fuelling

- Maintenance and insurance

Vehicles attract points based on: Weight;

Engine capacity; Power and CO

2 emissions.

Points are converted to tax units.

LET = Tax units x Tax rate

6

7

4

5

0

1

2

3

11

12

13

8

9

10

17

18

19

20

14

15

16

POINTS

CALCULATION OF POINTS TO DETERMINE LUXURY ENERGY TAX UNITS

WEIGHT

(KG)

CAPACITY

(CC)

POWER

(KW)

CO

2

EMISSIONS

(g/km)

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1275

1350

1425

1500

1550

1600

1650

1700

1750

1800

1850

1900

1950

2000

600

850

1100

1350

1600

1850

2050

2250

2450

2650

2850

3000

3150

3300

3450

3600

3700

3800

3900

3950

4000

80

90

100

110

40

50

60

70

120

130

140

150

160

165

170

175

180

185

190

195

200

120

130

140

150

80

90

100

110

155

160

165

170

175

180

185

190

195

200

215

220

225

HOLDEN EPIKA

Weight

Capacity

Power

CO

2 emissions

Total

Specifications

1499kg

2500cc

115KW

221g

Points

10

9

8

20

47

TAXING POINTS CONVERTED TO TAX UNITS

FOR IMPOSITION OF LUXURY ENERGY TAX

Imposition of

Tax

Initial new purchase of vehicle

Road

Registration

Fuel

Consumption per litre

Maintenance per $100 spent

Tax Units per

Point

Holden

Epika (47)

1000 tax units 47000

100 tax units

0.2 tax units

10 tax units

4700

9.4

470

7

8

5

6

9

3

4

1

2

10

DEMONSTRATION OF LUXURY ENERGY TAX FOR HOLDEN

EPIKA

Year Value per tax unit set by

Govern ment

$

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.15

0.25

0.5

0.75

1

Initial

Purchase

$

Road

Holden Epika

Fuel

Registrati on

$

Per litre

$

470

940

1410

1880

2350

7050

11750

23500

35250

47000

47

94

141

188

235

705

1175

2350

3525

4700

0.094

0.188

0.282

0.376

0.47

1.41

2.35

4.70

7.05

9.40

Maintenan ce

Per $100

$

4.70

9.40

14.1

18.80

23.50

70.50

117.50

235.00

352.50

470.00

ADMINISTRATION

LET section through current licensing department

Smart debit card – prepayments of units required

Registered Vehicles: LET registration number

All vehicles to be fitted with monitor that identifies car ignition system and fuel tank

The fuel pump at petrol stations have vehicle and card reading devices

IMPACT

Centralised system with authorised agents permitted to debit smart card.

Agents=car dealers; licensing offices; insurance companies; repairers; pump stations.

Exemptions

Effect: On purchasing, use and maintenance of vehicle

System can be extended to user charges and congestion tax

ATTRIBUTES

Raise awareness that liquid fuel is a luxury

Influence purchase of sustainable cars

Raise revenue at four levels

Encourage reduced driving and reduced emissions

Ease of payment by consumer using debit card

Ease of collection by nominated agencies

Easy to administer

Low cost of administration

Minimal evasion potential

Protection of privacy and fair and transparent

CONCLUSION

Since Ford’s invention of constant moving assembly line, vehicles have become bigger and more powerful. Are they sustainable?

The current Australian tax policy does not promote the transportation policy.

The Australian Government should take the lead in implementing transportation taxes such as

LET with synchronised user charges and congestion tax to promote efficient movement of people and goods with the least amount of liquid fuel.

Download