The application of a Business Intelligence tool at a higher education institution. Author: Vincent Nyalungu, Mr School Of Information Technology, University of Pretoria Tel: +27 12 429 2733 E-mail: vnyalung@unisa.ac.za IKM Research Paper Keywords: Knowledge Management, Business Intelligence (BI), Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition (BIEE), Data Warehouse, Strategic Decision Making, Strategic Planning, Higher Education Institutions. Abstract: This paper presents a discussion on the importance of business intelligence (BI) and the role that a specific BI tool, Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition, plays in the strategic decision-making processes in a higher education institution. The University of the Witwatersrand, often referred to as Wits, was used as a case study. The main objective for the deployment and application of a business intelligence tool was to enhance the quality and aptness of the input of data to the organisational decision-making process. The quality of the data, which is an organisational asset, is therefore of the utmost importance. Approaches for the identification of business intelligence from corporate information and knowledge management were also assessed. A questionnaire was administered among key informants within the university in order to address some of the pertinent issues at higher education institutions. The paper also presents a proposed framework to be used in line with the best practices in the implementation of business intelligence tools or solutions. ii IKM | Research Report 1. Introduction According to Augier and Knudsen (2004:6), “the rise of the knowledge economy has shaped and created new challenges for senior managers and this has made managing intellectual capital an integral part of the organisation strategy”. This has created a critical need for the development, creation and capturing of value from knowledge and competencies. For knowledge workers to make sound and informed business decisions there is a need for a coherent system, which represents a single version of the truth about organisational performance. Digital networks, such as student and staff databases, provide access to vast amounts of data and information, but business intelligence systems are needed to transform data and information in a momentous way. In this study, the researchers looked at the use of one of the decision support tools, namely a business intelligence tool. The BI tool is an instrument or a catalyst used to support strategic decision-making processes by making sure that quality information is readily available. Moreover, the study sought to establish whether the tool implemented at the University of the Witwatersrand had yielded positive results in terms of ensuring that the efficiency in accessing information had improved. 2. Background to the study In the rapidly changing higher education environment, it is of the utmost importance for an institution, such as the University of the Witwatersrand, to take into account new information and the latest information patterns that are constantly taking effect. Consequently, if such an institution is to strive economically, information patterns and trends should be interpreted correctly and in a timely fashion to align with current trends in order to facilitate sound strategic decision making. It is therefore crucial for the University of the Witwatersrand, especially the executive management, to have continuous access to information that is crucial for management decision making and strategic planning. A greater focus needs to be placed on the conversion of data to business intelligence. This is very IKM | Research Report 1 important because data alone does not provide insight into an organisation’s performance. Only after adding value to this data is its meaning realised, especially when technologies, like business intelligence, are applied to the data. This can be achieved by prioritising issues such as coherent analyses, uniform data definitions, standard interpretations of the information and “the availability of up–to-date and reliable information for all departments” (Guan, Nunez and Welsh, 2002). 3. Overview of the case study organisation: The University of the Witwatersrand. At the University of the Witwatersrand, as with any other organisation, users at different levels are currently overloaded and overwhelmed with mountains of electronic, structured and unstructured data. From notes taken in point form to massive documents and reports, this data has accumulated over many years, and is continuing to accumulate at an startling rate. It was absolutely essential that the University of the Witwatersrand creates a functional technology with the capability of managing this data effectively. So far this has been an elusive challenge. Until now, efforts seem to have focused more on creating jargon to describe data, like metadata, and on making up ideas, than on developing a core technology that truly, in practice, enables better management of data and information. A business intelligence tool was deployed to try and address these issues. The Strategic Planning Division at the University of the Witwatersrand supports the university with initiatives regarding all the information management, institutional research, quality management, institutional planning and policy matters that affect management decision-making processes. The success of these processes lies in providing crucial information for the institution in order to facilitate decision making, much of which relies heavily on the accessibility of data that is usable. Only data that is accurate, systematic as well as regularly or periodically updated is usable within this structure. The BI tool that Wits has adopted is the Oracle’s Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition (BIEE). IKM | Research Report 2 The University of the Witwatersrand adopted the same architecture and framework used by Van Dyk and Conradie (2007:122), where the BI tool uses data that is housed in the data warehouse (Figure 3.1) Figure 3.1 Business Intelligence Framework, (Van Dyk and Conradie, 2007:122). As illustrated in Figure 3.1, the data warehouse uses source data from various transactional source systems, such as the student system, human resources system and financial system. The business intelligence tool is then deployed to read data from the data warehouse and makes it available to various users. The BI tool used by the University of the Witwatersrand is the Oracle BI Interactive dashboard (Figure 3.2). The data used is housed in a Data warehouse, which is made up of various data marts from different systems, as mentioned before. 3 IKM | Research Report Figure 3.2: University of the Witwatersrand Dashboard Snapshot (BI Tool), University of the Witwatersrand (2009). As illustrated in Figure 3.2, a dashboard is highly interactive with drill-down functionality. It allows users to have different views of the information contained in the dashboard and also allows users to look at any of the university’s strategic objectives and measure their performance based on the set targets. These targets (e.g. the pass rate) are set by the university senior executive team and are reviewed from time to time. According to the researchers, central to most organisation’s profitability is the identification and exploitation of new business opportunities and challenges. In today’s hypercompetitive business environments, organisations that do not continuously develop and exploit new business opportunities will quickly see their profit margins and long-term growth drop. In contrast, competitors who make use of new opportunities will flourish. Similarly, organisations that fail to effectively manage their new business efforts will see their stock price decline or plunge. IKM | Research Report 4 This challenge is particularly crucial for knowledge-based organisations, like the University of the Witwatersrand, as an increasingly rapid technological change has become a primary source of excessive competition. The most recent technological advancement in the higher education sectors are technologies like WebCT (Web Course Tools) and Student Online registrations. These online technologies enable students to interact with institutions without actually having to visit their respective campuses. Students can register, pay for their fees, view and update personal information, access study materials and get their results with the aid of these technologies. The study focused primarily on the strategy used by the University of the Witwatersrand to provide needed information through the adoption of a BI tool, BIEE, and the data quality issues raised in the preliminary investigations. In addition, it was also established whether the deployment of a BI tool at the University of the Witwatersrand has yielded positive results in terms of improved efficiency and effective management of information for strategic decision-making purposes as well as challenges encountered when the tool was implemented. Also a basic BI framework is proposed. Within this broad aim the ensuing research questions and sub-questions needed to be answered. 4. Research questions and sub-questions Based on the discussion in the preceding section, about the implementation of the BI at University of the Witwatersrand and whether it has effectively improved in ensuring that users at different levels have access to information used in decision making, the main research question and the sub-questions that guide the study are outlined below: 5 IKM | Research Report 4.1. Research question How does the application of the business intelligence tool add value to the strategic planning process at the University of the Witwatersrand? 4.2. Sub-questions What value did the Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition (BIEE) add to the decision-making processes at the University of the Witwatersrand in terms of improving efficiency? What are the business intelligence tools and the benefits for organisations? What are the challenges encountered when a business intelligence tool is implemented? If any, what were the lessons learnt? 5. Methodology The researcher used the mixed methods approach, which is mainly composed of the usage of both qualitative and quantitative research methods and triangulation (De Vos et al., 2005:361). The mixed methods approach in this case suited the research, in that it could capture the various perceptions of BIEE users at the University of the Witwatersrand. A questionnaire using scaled questions of five points, in a Likert scale format was used for the study. The rationale behind scaled questions is that ‘they are useful for measuring attitudes as they can capture subtle gradations of opinions or perception’ (Terre Blanche and Durrheim, 2002: 296). 6 IKM | Research Report In addition, the researcher conducted interviews with key informants at the university. These informants are personnel members who were part of the implementation team for business intelligence tool 6. Key concepts 6.1. Business Intelligence (BI) Business Intelligence can be defined as “a broad category of applications and technologies used to collect or gather access and analyse large data to be used in decision-making processes” (Wang and Wang, 2008:623). And according to Herschel and Jones (2005:46), business intelligence is “concerned with decision making using technologies such as data warehousing (DW) and online analytical processing techniques (OLAP)”. 6.2. Data warehouse (DW) A data warehouse is a “repository or database used to store transactional source data and is specifically structured for query and analysis performance. This is made up of the logical and physical subset of the data warehouse called data marts” (Van Dyk and Conradie, 2007:125). 6.3. Knowledge Management (KM) Knowledge Management is “an integrated, systematic approach to identifying, managing and sharing all of an organisation’s intangible assets”. These include among others documents, patents, databases policies, and procedures as well as experiences held by individual workers (Hicks, Dattero and Galup, 2006:19). IKM | Research Report 7 Table 6.1: List of abbreviations used in the study Abbreviation Full name BI Business intelligence BIEE Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition CNS Computer Networks Services DSS Decision support system DW Data warehouse/data warehousing HEIs Higher Education Institutions HEMIS Higher Education Management Information System KM Knowledge Management KPIs Key Performance Indicators MIU Management Information Unit 7. Literature review Business intelligence is more concerned with “decision making using technologies like data warehousing (DW) and online analytical processing techniques (OLAP)”, (Herschel and Jones, 2005:46). In today’s digital age, companies have large amounts of data in their multiple databases, which often leads to confusion and the mismanagement of data resources. In some cases, there is little correlation between “the practice of capturing large amounts of data and the ability to access the used data to generate actionable information” (Hauser, 2007:45). This normally happens when different systems are used and the data stored in these systems might be of a different format and trying to access this data might pose a huge challenge. IKM | Research Report 8 According to Skyrme (1997), since knowledge is the end-product of all learning, any organisation that needs to compete through knowledge must by necessity develop learning capabilities, namely by becoming a learning organisation. The University of the Witwatersrand is not an exception, because knowledge is embodied in new services and has become the most important source of wealth creation for the university. Skyrme (1997:34-37) further states that if one has a valuable and useful knowledgebased asset, the advantage lies in limiting its availability to competitors. The University of the Witwatersrand, like most organisations, restricts their competitors from gaining access to their knowledge-based intangible assets by getting these patented. This allows the control of the movement of these assets and also allows the university to charge for the use of knowledge. Organisations can acquire knowledge by experience, experimentation or acquisition. In general, most researchers will normally publish their findings and experiments and these are normally used to solve problems and issues. Barnes (2002:17) defines “knowledge management as an integrated, systematic approach to identifying, managing and sharing all of an organisation’s intangible assets including: databases, documents, policies, and procedures as well as previously unarticulated expertise and experiences held by individual workers”. According to Coulson-Thomas (1997:24-25), “knowledge management initiatives are unlikely to be successful unless they are integrated with business strategy and related to the development of the core capabilities of the organisation. Knowledge management is not a separate management function or a separate process but an all-encompassing process”. According to Bhatt (2000) “knowledge management consists of a set of crossdisciplinary and organisational processes that seek to create ongoing and continuous new knowledge by leveraging the synergy of combined information IKM | Research Report 9 technologies and the creative and innovative capacity of people” ,as illustrated in Figure 7.1 below. Figure 7.1: Key components in knowledge management, adopted from Bhatt (2000) As shown in Figure 7.1 above, business intelligence together with other analytical tools, such as decision tools and data mining tools, are components of knowledge management. Business intelligence (BI) provide access to vast amounts of data and information and knowledge management is applied to translate information in a meaningful way as managers need to use this information for decision making. At the end of the day, knowledge management is about individuals; it’s about people (70%). Clearly, the goal of knowledge management is maintained and sustained by individuals and business performances through on-going learning and unlearning (mainly by getting rid of old ways of doing things). Computing technologies alone have natural limitations. They normally have difficulty in generating important insights from data because they cannot query or re-interpret their programmed logic in the data and the assumptions made by system programmers. Given these IKM | Research Report 10 limitations, the people who use these 'systems' have at least an equally important role in knowledge management. The University of the Witwatersrand is a knowledge-based organisation. Academic institutions are classified as knowledge-based organisations because their primary business is training, community engagement and research (Rossi, 2010:155-158). The university’s knowledge workers use a number of desperate computer-based information systems and sources, like study materials, registrations systems, human resources systems and student tracking systems. These information sources are integrated and gained through a common, yet personalised, interface in the form of a portal. Portals and the intranet create a single customised gateway to a wide and diverse collection of data, information and knowledge. At the University of the Witwatersrand, the information, which is normally available on the intranet, is limited to the university community and hence is not for public consumption. At the same time there is some form of business intelligence present and various users use the information gathered to support their decisions. Knowledge about what competitors in the higher education sphere do is something that Wits cannot survive without. The University of the Witwatersrand needs to know for instance what its counterparts, like the University of Johannesburg, are doing to attract students as these institutions are competing for almost the same cohort of students. The University of the Witwatersrand, just like most organisations, needs to derive its competitive leverage from knowledge-based activities (Chase, 1997: 38-45). The ability to capitalise on knowledge lies behind the success of almost all responsive organisations. One of the important components of business intelligence is a data warehouse, which is used more as a repository to house data. A typical data warehouse will help with the provision of information that will be used by organisational decision makers. Dobbs, Stone and Abbot (2002:235-236) point out that the amount of data that is currently collected from various sources is IKM | Research Report 11 increasing rapidly. Therefore, there is a need for businesses to create a tool that will be used to view and disseminate business information; a data warehouse is then used for this purpose. Organisations, including the University of the Witwatersrand, use the data warehousing approach to solve data normalisation problems and to meet business needs. In the case of University of the Witwatersrand, this is used to house student data, including profiles that can then be used for decision making. 7.1. The application of business intelligence at the University of the Witwatersrand. The success of a business in a competitive environment lies with the decision makers’ ability to access relevant, timely and accurate data. This information can be used to do benchmarking studies and for this to succeed a strong BI presence is a must. Therefore, the University of the Witwatersrand developed a business intelligence strategy and framework, which involved the use of data mining tools. The filtered information was then stored in data marts, which forms part of the data warehouse. This was to be of great help to the University community and other stakeholders and formed part of the university’s business intelligence framework; where management could access timely and relevant information for decision making. Staff at various departments could also access the Intranet and could look for a knowledge store and use it productively. The University of the Witwatersrand, like any organisation, needs a clearly defined business intelligence strategy and top management buy-in and involvement in order to realise its goals. This is clearly documented in the University of the Witwatersrand’s 2022 strategy document, Where an important strategic objective is to become a top university, recognised as one of the ‘Top 100 universities in the world’ (Wits Intranet, 2009). Management need information to make decisions and the role of the BI tool implemented was to make sure that this is realised. IKM | Research Report 12 At the University of the Witwatersrand, the business intelligence (BI) framework as shown below in Figure 7.2 is intended to make data accessible to all levels of management and other stakeholders or role players. Data is extracted on a regular basis from the i-Wits applications (Students Database, Human Resources and Finance currently) and other applications (e.g. Wits Publications, Excel Spreadsheets, etc.). This data is then integrated and loaded into the Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition (BIEE). BIEE is a comprehensive suite of enterprise Oracle BI products, it is used to deliver a diverse BI capabilities including interactive dashboards, ad hoc proactive intelligence and alerts, enterprise and financial reporting, disconnected analytics, real-time predictive intelligence, and much more. Figure 7.2: The University of the Witwatersrand BI Framework (Wits Intranet, 2009) As shown in Figure 7.2 above, data is sourced from different applications and is placed into the data warehouse from where it is extracted and loaded into easy to understand, easy to use, data marts. Users like the managers, deans and IKM | Research Report 13 administrators can access these data marts through the Presentation Layer using Business Objects (or the Oracle Discoverer for Students). These reporting tools allow managers and administrators to build reports by pulling the column headings they require into a report and restricting the information they will want to view. Reports that are frequently used are always quality assured by a dedicated business manager and can be published and shared as Corporate Documents. Ad hoc reports associated with once-off business cases can also be produced quickly and easily. 8. Findings of the study This section presents and discusses the main findings of the study. These findings are composed of the overall perceptions of the users of the Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition (BIEE) tool and analysis of the data as collected from the selected users (managers and supervisors) at the University of the Witwatersrand. The perceptions of the key personnel involved in the implementation of the tool are also addressed. 8.1 Respondents profiles (background) and findings The population for this study was made up of 40 respondents, namely: executives, managers, supervisors and deans at the University of the Witwatersrand. In terms of the responses, a total of 21 respondents answered the survey, which signifies a 53% response rate for the first questionnaire that was administered. This response rate is considered to be high, even more than the 49% response rate benchmark set by Rao (2009:165). These respondents were classified according to certain categories. Figure 8.1 below illustrates this: 14 IKM | Research Report 12 Responses 10 8 6 4 2 0 User (Non manegerial) Supervisor Senior Management 2 10 9 Figure 8.1: Respondent Profile: Job classification Figure 8.1 above shows that the majority of respondents were mostly supervisory or managerial staff (10), followed by the senior management (9) and then the users (2). The senior management category included a high-ranking deputy vicechancellor of the university and a few deans of faculties and heads of departments. The data reveals that there might not have been any significant differences in the way the three categories reviewed their experience with the BI system. This is especially true in terms of efficiency improvement, where after using the tool they felt that they could perform their function more efficiently than before. As a theme, the following section looks at the importance of training and consultation when a system or tool is implemented. The respondents revealed that there was no wide consultation by the University among interested parties in the implementation of the BIEE. A total of 14 out of 21 respondents affirmed that no consultation had been put in place; they only became new consumers when the process had been initiated and could not have a say in it. Figure 8.2 below shows that there was little consultation during the implementation process, which is one of the main themes in the study. According to Maguire, Ojiako and Said (2009:81), any system that is related to implementation needs a full consultation and transparency commitment with all stakeholders involved. IKM | Research Report 15 Responses Consulted? 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Frequency Yes No 7 14 Figure 8.2: Results for the question: ‘Were you consulted during the implementation process?’ The absence of prior consultation could have been arguably ‘compensated’ for by the fact that the same respondents were trained (see Figure 8.3 below) before making use of the tool. Received training? Responses 20 15 10 5 0 Frequency Yes No 16 5 Figure 8.3: Results for the question: ‘Did you receive training before using the tool?’ According to Figure 8.3 above, 16 respondents or 76.2 % of the respondents received prior training before they used the BIEE tool. This signified the importance of receiving training before one starts using the tool. The provision of best practices IKM | Research Report 16 on the BIEE tool usage enhances the optimal use of the tool (Ranjan, 2008:471). Figure 8.4 below gives a graphical representation of this fact. Figure 8.4: Graphical representation for the question: ‘Did you receive training before using the tool?’ Ideally though, the remaining 23.8% (5) of the respondents should have been trained in order to facilitate easier transition in using the new tool. Of those who had been trained, one respondent felt that the system was ‘not too personalised for [one’s] needs’. This is because in the privileges that were set in the tool initially only recognised dedicated faculty, however, this was later rectified. This might be attributed to the fact that the system did not cater for information to be used for strategic decision making, as some aspects in the tool were operational in nature. 8.2 The tool efficiency and usability Figure 8.5 below proved the fact that the tool has overall yielded positive developments for the University of the Witwatersrand. 17 IKM | Research Report BI implementation yielded results? 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Yes No 15 6 Frequency Figure 8.5: Results for the question: ‘Has the BI implementation yielded results at Wits?’ Figure 8.5 above shows that in totality, the implementation of BI at the University of the Witwatersrand had been fruitful, according to 15 of the respondents (71.4%). For example, one respondent, a head of school said: ‘I am able to access data quickly.’ Another member of senior management said: ‘Managers have real-time information at hand.’ These responses show the positive perceptions of the users regarding the system. This real time information is used in strategic decisionmaking processes and thereby supports the university’s strategic planning aspirations. A smaller portion of respondents (28.6%), did not agree that the BI implementation yielded positive results. One of the respondent’s reason was that ‘[he does not] know how to use the tool’. Again, this clearly shows that training is still one of the important aspects. 8.3 Perceptions by the implementers of the tool The two respondents cited three challenges that were faced in implementing the new system. The first two are ‘content’ (what data was needed for the warehouse) and ‘design’. The third is that Tata Consulting Services (one of the top 10 development firms in the world) are not familiar with both the multidimensional IKM | Research Report 18 design techniques for star schemas and the implementation in parallel with implementing the ERP. 8.4 Summary of the findings The totality of the research findings is based on the variety of perceptions and views from the users of the system, namely: supervisors, managers and senior managers. It is also based on the views expressed by the implementers of the system, as is shown below: The users’ opinions concerning BIEE or the dashboard were that it had overall improved efficiency and access to information to be used in support of the decision-making processes. The implementers also felt that the new system provided a better level of operational efficiency despite a number of challenges faced in implementing it, on top of the various lessons that were learnt in terms of improving the methodology adopted when the data warehouse was designed. 9. Recommendations and Conclusions This study focussed on the perceptions of the users of the BIEE system as well as various analyses of data collected from the management staff at Wits, that relate to issues about: the way in which BIEE can be made to add more value to strategic planning at the University of the Witwatersrand; or how BIEE can be used efficiently and effectively in facilitating decision-making processes in the context of University of the Witwatersrand. After analysing the data the following recommendations were made in an attempt to improve access to information used in decision making at the University of the Witwatersrand . 19 IKM | Research Report 9.1. Proposed business intelligence framework In principle the tool is not an issue, rather the framework under which it was implemented is the issue. More often than not a student’s historical records cannot be deleted and for older universities this is a serious challenge as students will request this information and data from time to time. That’s why a BI framework in Figure 9.1 is proposed, especially for a higher education institution to make sure that there is a coherent structure followed when implementing a BI tool. The framework by Ranjan (2008:246) provides a best fit for an organisation like the University of the Witwatersrand. Web Analytics, Students Portal, Finance and HR Dashboard (In-memory BI) Figure 9.1: The BI Framework, adopted from Ranjan (2008:466) In order to provide some concrete indications of how the BI framework might be implemented or reviewed at University of the Witwatersrand, the following BI domains have been identified: IKM | Research Report 20 Students: biographical information and academic information; Programmes and courses: information relating to the academic structure, enrolments, success and throughput rates; Human resources: biographical information, information relating to conditions of service (remuneration and benefits), workload, research outputs, etc; and Finance: income and expenditure, assets and liabilities, procurement, estates etc; In the proposed framework (Figure 9.1) for the University of the Witwatersrand, the student web portal is integrated with the human resources (HR) and financial components and this will be visible through a fully functional dashboard. The reason for this is that there should be consistency in the reporting framework at the university as there are always relationships in the mentioned systems, the student system, HR and finance. A student’s account information is always housed in different systems just like the student and HR systems. The link between student and HR systems is normally information about lecturers and information about students in their respective classes. Thus decision makers will have information at their fingertips to make decisions in support of the strategic priorities of the organisation thus contributing to the strategic planning of the organisation. 9.2 Consultation and buy-in Over and above the aforementioned the following section looks at other recommendations: Firstly, it is of outmost importance to start a business intelligence implementation process with a unambiguous know-how of the operational development access to this information at disposal this will provide. By simply knowing how the data will be applied or used, the problems it can help eliminate and the decision-making processes it can support, it is possible to develop a return on investment (ROI) calculation that allows organisations’ top-executives to estimate the benefits of the tool implemented (Hedgebeth, 2007: 415-416). The IKM | Research Report 21 importance of management buy-in cannot be overemphasised, and according to Hedgebeth (2007:414) a typical BI “implementation effort touches almost every aspect of an organisation. 10. Conclusion of the study According to the findings of the study, it is apparent that the business intelligence tool implemented at the University of the Witwatersrand has yielded positive developments in making sure that efficiency is improved and users at different levels have access to information that they can use in support of decision-making processes. Though this was not a smooth an easy feat in terms of the challenges encountered when the tool was implemented and users feel that there is still a lot to be done to make it complete. The lessons learnt during implementation will be used when enhancements are done to the current system and the proposed framework will go a long way in ensuring that all aspects of the data requirement are also addressed. 11. Future research Future research that stems out of this study will be to implement the proposed framework and then to test whether it has been able to improve efficiency in accessing information at University of the Witwatersrand. 22 IKM | Research Report 12. References Augier, M. & Knudsen, T. (2004). The architecture and design of the knowledge organization. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(4):6-20. Barnes, S. (2002). Knowledge management systems, theory and practice. London: Thompson Learning, Cengage Learning Business Press. Bhatt, D. (2000). EFQM Excellence Model and Knowledge Management Implications. [Online] Available from: http://www.eknowledgecenter.com/articles/1010/1010.htm (Accessed: 1 May 2010). Chase, R. (1997). The Knowledge-Based Organization. Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(1): 38-49. Coulson-Thomas, C. (1997). The Future of the Organization: Selected Knowledge Management Issues. The Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(1):15-26. De Vos, A.S., Strydom, H., Fouche, C.B. & Delport, C.S.L. (2005). Research at grassroots. 3rd Edition. Pretoria: Van Schaik. Dobbs, T.; Stone, M. & Abbot, J. (2002). UK data warehousing and business intelligence implementation. Qualitative Market Research, 5(4):235-238. Guan, J., Nunez, W. & Welsh, J. (2002). Institutional strategy and information support: the role of data warehousing in higher education. Campus-Wide Information Systems Journal, 101(4):168-174. 23 Hauser, W.J. (2007). Marketing analytics: the evolution of marketing research in the twenty-first. Direct Marketing: An International Journal, 1(1):38-54. IKM | Research Report Hedgebeth, D. (2007). Data-driven decision making for the enterprise: an overview of business intelligence applications. VINE, 37(4): 414-420. Herschel, T. & Jones, N.E. (2005). Knowledge management and business intelligence: the importance of integration. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(4):45-55. Hicks, R., Dattero, R. & Galup, S.D. (2006). The five-tier knowledge management hierarchy. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(1):19-31. Maguire, S.; Ojiako, U. & Said, A. (2009). ERP implementation in Omantel: a case study. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(1):78-92. Rao, P. (2009). International survey research: Understanding national cultures to increase survey response rate. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 16(2):165-178. Ranjan, J. (2008). Business justification with business intelligence. Journal of Information and Management Systems, 38(4):461-475. Rossi, F. (2010). The governance of university-industry knowledge transfer. European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(2):155-171. Skyrme, D. (1997). Knowledge Agenda. The Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(1): 27-37. Terre Blanche, M. & Durrheim, K. (2002). Research in Practice. Applied methods for the Social Sciences. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press. 24 IKM | Research Report University of the Witwatersrand. (2009). Oracle BI Interactive dashboard. [Online]Available from: http://146.141.22.22.9704/analytics/saw.dll?Dashboard (Accessed: 17 June 2009). Van Dyk, L. & Conradie, P. (2007). Creating business intelligence from course management systems. Campus-Wide Information Systems Journal, 24(2):120-133. Wang, H. & Wang, S. (2008). A knowledge management approach to data mining process for business intelligence. Industrial Management Data System Journal, 108 (5):622-634. Wits Intranet. (2009). [Online] Available from: http://web.wits.ac.za (Accessed: 30 June 2009). 25 IKM | Research Report