Type 2 Diabetes: How sweet it is! Dr. Jeremy Gilbert Division of Endocrinology Assistant Professor University of Toronto Faculty/Presenter Disclosure • Faculty: Dr. Jeremy Gilbert • Program: 51st Annual Scientific Assembly • Relationships with commercial interests: – Honoraria: – AstraZeneca – Bristol Meyers Squibb – Eli Lilly – Merck – Novonordisk – Sanofi Disclosure of Commercial Support • This program has received financial support n/a from in the form of n/a • This program has received in-kind support from n/a in the form of n/a • Potential for conflict(s) of interest: – Dr. Jeremy GIlbert has received no payment from any organization supporting this program AND/OR organization whose product(s) are being discussed in this program. Mitigating Potential Bias • All recommendations will be based on the Canadian Diabetes Association Guidelines and relevant medical literature. OBJECTIVES • 1. Review highlights from the 2013 Canadian Diabetes Association Guidelines including diagnostic criteria and treatment goals • 2. Discuss anti-hyperglyemic agent options after Metformin, focussing on newer medication options • 3. Explore the complications of Diabetes and examine vascular protective strategies in individuals with Diabetes www.guidelines.diabetes.ca How common is Diabetes? Diabetes in Canada: Prevalence by Province and Territory Age-standardized† prevalence of diagnosed DM among individuals ≥ 1 year, 2008/09 YT 5.4% BC 5.4% < 5.0 5.0 < 5.5 5.5 < 6.0 6.0 < 6.5 ≥ 6.5 NT 5.5% NU 4.4% AB 4.9% NL 6.5% MB 5.9% SK 5.4% † Age-standardized to the 1991 Canadian population. ON 6.0% QC 5.1% PE 5.6% NB 5.9% NS 6.1% NL, NS and ON had the highest prevalence, while NU, AB and QC had the lowest. Public Health Agency of Canada. Diabetes in Canada: Facts and figures from a public health perspective. Ottawa, 2011. Diabetes in Canada: Prevalence of Diagnosed Diabetes by age and sex Prevalence of diagnosed diabetes among individuals aged ≥ 1 year, by age group and sex, 2008/09 Overall Prevalence 30 Females 6.4% Males 7.2% Total 6.8% Prevalence (%) 25 20 15 10 5 0 Age group (years) 1-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 ≥85 Canada Prevalence increased with age. The sharpest increase occurred after age 40 years. The highest prevalence was in the 75-79 year age group. Public Health Agency of Canada. Diabetes in Canada: Facts and figures from a public health perspective. Ottawa, 2011. Patients with DM are more likely to be hospitalized for many conditions Public Health Agency of Canada (August 2011); using 2008/09 data from the Canadian Chronic Disease Surveillance System (Public Health Agency of Canada). The pathophysiology of T2DM includes three main defects Islet α-cell produces excess glucagon Pancreas β-cell produces less insulin 1. Insulin deficiency Excess glucagon Diminished insulin Hyperglycemia Diminished insulin Muscle and fat Liver 2. Excess glucose output 3. Insulin resistance Type 2 Diabetes is a Progressive Disease Beta Cell Function (%) 100 Stages of Type 2 diabetes in relationship to ß-cell function 75 50 25 Impaired glucose tolerance -12 -10 Postprandial hyperglycemia -6 Type 2 diabetes phase I -2 0 Type 2 diabetes phase II 2 Type 2 diabetes phase III 6 10 14 Years from Diagnosis • • • 50% of ß-cell function is already lost at diagnosis ß-cell function will continue to decline despite treatment Majority of patients will eventually require insulin therapy Lebovitz HE. Diabetes Review 1999; 7(3):139-53. UKPDS Group. Diabetes 1995; 44:1249. Progressive impairment in β-cell function Diet/conv Rx (n=376) Metformin (n=159) SU/intensive (n=511) β-cell function declines, while . . . 10 9 75 HbA1c β-cell function (%) 100 . . . hyperglycemia increases 50 8 7 25 6 5 0 0 1 SU = sulfonylurea 2 3 Years 4 5 6 0 1 2 3 Years 4 5 6 UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Diabetes. 1995;44:1249–1258. Question • How often should should a FPG be done in most individuals > 40 years of age: A) every year B) every 2 years C) every 3 years D) every 4 years E) every 5 years 2013 Diagnosis of Diabetes FPG ≥7.0 mmol/L Fasting = no caloric intake for at least 8 hours or A1C ≥6.5% (in adults) Using a standardized, validated assay, in the absence of factors that affect the accuracy of the A1C and not for suspected type 1 diabetes or 2hPG in a 75-g OGTT ≥11.1 mmol/L or Random PG ≥11.1 mmol/L Random= any time of the day, without regard to the interval since the last meal 2hPG = 2-hour plasma glucose; FPG = fasting plasma glucose; OGTT = oral glucose tolerance test; PG = plasma glucose 2013 Diagnosis of Prediabetes* Test Result Prediabetes Category Fasting Plasma Glucose (mmol/L) 6.1 - 6.9 Impaired fasting glucose (IFG) 7.8 – 11.0 Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) 6.0 - 6.4 Prediabetes 2-hr Plasma Glucose in a 75-g Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (mmol/L) Glycated Hemoglobin (A1C) (%) * Prediabetes = IFG, IGT or A1C 6.0 - 6.4% high risk of developing T2DM Screening Checklist ASSESS all adults clinically every year for risk of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) SCREEN every 3 years if ≥ 40 years or high risk on risk calculator SCREEN earlier and more frequently if very high risk on risk calculator or additional risk factors present USE fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and/or A1C as initial screening tests Glycated Hemoglobin (A1C) /Glucose A1C (%) mmol/L 12% ________________ 16.5 11% __________________14.9 10% _________________ 13.4 9% __________________11.8 8% __________________10.1 7% ___________________ 8.6 6% ___________________ 7.0 Kollman (2008) Diabetes Care. 31:381-385 What is new in making the diagnosis of diabetes? 2013 Individualizing A1C Targets Consider 7.1-8.5% if: which must be balanced against the risk of hypoglycemia Macro and Microvascular Benefits? DCCT n=1441 T1DM Intensive (≥ 3 injections/day or CSII) vs Conventional (1-2 injections per day) Reduction in Retinopathy Primary Prevention Secondary Intervention 76% RRR 54% RRR (95% CI 62-85%) (95% CI 39-66%) RRR = relative risk reduction CI = confidence interval The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977-986. DCCT: Reduction in Albuminuria Primary Prevention Secondary Intervention 34% RRR 43% RRR (p<0.04) (p=0.001) 56% RRR (p=0.01) RRR = relative risk Solid line = risk of developing microalbuminuria Dashed line = risk of developing macroalbuminuria reduction CI = confidence interval The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977-986. guidelines.diabetes.ca | 1-800-BANTING (226-8464) | diabetes.ca Copyright © 2013 Canadian Diabetes Association Reduction in Neuropathy The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977-986. UKPDS: N = 3867 T2DM 9 Conventional 7.9% A1C (%) 8 Intensive 7.0% 7 6 0 0 3 UKPDS Study Group. Lancet 1998:352:837-53. 6 9 12 15 Legacy Effect of Earlier Glucose Control After median 8.5 years post-trial follow-up Aggregate Endpoint 1997 2007 Any diabetes related endpoint RRR: P: 12% 0.029 9% 0.040 Microvascular disease RRR: P: 25% 0.0099 24% 0.001 Myocardial infarction RRR: P: 16% 0.052 15% 0.014 All-cause mortality RRR: P: 6% 0.44 13% 0.007 Holman R, et al. N Engl J Med 2008;359. Lifestyle Modification & Medications for hyperglycemia How do we choose? Macronutrient Distribution (% Total Energy) % of total energy Calories per gram Grams for 2000 calorie/day diet BW = body weight Carbohydrates Protein Fat 45-60% 15-20% 20-35% (or 1-1.5g / kg BW) 4 4 9 225-300 75-100 44-78 2013 Physical Activity Checklist DO a minimum of 150 minutes of moderate-to vigorous-intensity aerobic exercise per week INCLUDE resistance exercise ≥ 2 times a week SET physical activity goals and INVOLVE a multidisciplinary team ASSESS patient’s health before prescribing an exercise regimen Modest weight loss CAN make a difference • Goal is to prevent weight gain, promote weight loss and prevent weight re-gain • Weight loss of only 5-10% improves: – – – – Insulin sensitivity Glycemic control Blood pressure Lipid levels It can be done! 460 Pounds 256 Pounds 2013 Pharmacotherapy in T2DM checklist CHOOSE initial therapy based on degree of hyperglycemia START with Metformin +/- others INDIVIDUALIZE your therapy choice based on characteristics of the patient and the agent REACH TARGET within 3-6 months of diagnosis AT DIAGNOSIS OF TYPE 2 DIABETES Start lifestyle intervention (nutrition therapy and physical activity) +/- Metformin L I F E S T Y L E A1C <8.5% If not at glycemic target (2-3 mos) Start / Increase metformin A1C 8.5% Symptomatic hyperglycemia with metabolic decompensation Start metformin immediately Consider initial combination with another antihyperglycemic agent Initiate insulin +/metformin If not at glycemic targets Add an agent best suited to the individual: Patient Characteristics Degree of hyperglycemia Risk of hypoglycemia Overweight or obesity Comorbidities (renal, cardiac, hepatic) Preferences & access to treatment Other Agent Characteristics BG lowering efficacy and durability Risk of inducing hypoglycemia Effect on weight Contraindications & side-effects Cost and coverage Other 2013 See next page… 2013 GLP-1 Actions Brain: reduced appetite Food intake Stomach: reduced emptying Beta-cells Insulin release Stomach Pancreas Blood glucose DPP-4 GI tract Net effect: GLP-1 Glucagon secretion α-cells Intestine Adapted from: Barnett A. Int J Clin Pract 2006;60:1454-70; Drucker DJ, et al. Lancet 2006;368:1696-705; Idris I, et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 2007;9:153-65. Impaired GLP-1 secretion in T2DM Normal subjects IGT T2DM patients 20 GLP-1 (pmol/l) * * * * * * 15 * 10 5 Baseline 0 0 *p<0.05 60 120 180 240 Time (min) GLP-1 AUC T2DM vs. NGT is decreased by Toft-Nielsen MB, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 53%, p<0.001 2001;86:3717–3723. Currently Available Incretins in Canada • GLP-1 Analogues – Liraglutide = Victoza – Exenetide = Byetta • More effective than DPPIV Inhibitors • Potential weight loss • Temporary Nausea • Injections • Expensive • Long term safety data • DPP-IV Inhbitors – Sitaglipitin = Januvia – Saxagliptin = Onglyza – Linagliptin = Trajenta • Less effective than GLP-1 Analogues • Weight neutral • Well tolerated • Oral • Often covered by ODB • Long term safety data Antihyperglycemic agents and Renal Function CKD Stage: GFR (mL/min): 5 < 15 4 15-29 3 30-59 30 Metformin Linagliptin 15 Saxagliptin 15 Sitagliptin 25 mg Exenatide 2.5 mg ≥ 90 60 50 30 50 mg 50 30 50 50 Liraglutide Glyburide 1 25 Acarbose Gliclazide/Glimepiride 2 60-89 15 30 30 50 Repaglinide Thiazolidinediones 30 Not recommended / contraindicated Caution and/or dose reduction Safe Adapted from: Product Monographs as of March 1, 2013; CDA Guidelines 2008; and Yale JF. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005; 16:S7-S10. What are the options for Insulin? Types of Insulin Insulin Type (trade name) Onset Peak Duration 10 - 15 min 10 - 15 min 10 - 15 min 1 - 1.5 h 1 - 1.5 h 1-2h 3-5h 3-5h 3.5 - 4.75 h 30 min 2-3h 6.5 h 1-3h 5-8h Up to 18 h 90 min Not applicable Up to 24 h (glargine 24 h, detemir 16 - 24 h) Bolus (prandial) Insulins Rapid-acting insulin analogues (clear): • Insulin aspart (NovoRapid®) • Insulin glulisine (Apidra™) • Insulin lispro (Humalog®) Short-acting insulins (clear): • Insulin regular (Humulin®-R) • Insulin regular (Novolin®geToronto) Basal Insulins Intermediate-acting insulins (cloudy): • Insulin NPH (Humulin®-N) • Insulin NPH (Novolin®ge NPH) Long-acting basal insulin analogues (clear) • Insulin detemir (Levemir®) • Insulin glargine (Lantus®) Types of Insulin (continued) Insulin Type (trade name) Time action profile Premixed Insulins Premixed regular insulin – NPH (cloudy): • 30% insulin regular/ 70% insulin NPH (Humulin® 30/70) • 30% insulin regular/ 70% insulin NPH (Novolin®ge 30/70) • 40% insulin regular/ 60% insulin NPH (Novolin®ge 40/60) • 50% insulin regular/ 50% insulin NPH (Novolin®ge 50/50) Premixed insulin analogues (cloudy): • 30% Insulin aspart/70% insulin aspart protamine crystals (NovoMix® 30) • 25% insulin lispro / 75% insulin lispro protamine (Humalog® Mix25®) • 50% insulin lispro / 50% insulin lispro protamine (Humalog® Mix50®) A single vial or cartridge contains a fixed ratio of insulin (% of rapid-acting or short-acting insulin to % of intermediate-acting insulin) Serum Insulin Level Time Human Basal: Humulin-N, Novolin ge NPH Analogue Basal: Lantus, Levemir Human Bolus: Humulin-R, Novolin ge Toronto Analogue Bolus: Apidra, Humalog, NovoRapid Serum Insulin Level Time Human Premixed: Humulin 30/70, Novolin ge 30/70 Analogue Premixed: Humalog Mix25, NovoMix 30 What about Hypoglycemia? 3 phases of hypo treatment 1. Acute 2. Intermediate 3. Future Acute ¾ cup OJ 6 LifeSavers 3 gluc tab 3 packs sugar 1 tbsp honey Intermediate 15 min recheck Future Why did it happen? How do I prevent it? Causes of hypo Too little food Too much activity Too much insulin Steps to Address Hypoglycemia 1. Recognize autonomic or neuroglycopenic symptoms 2. Confirm if possible (blood glucose <4.0 mmol/L) 3. Treat with “fast sugar” (simple carbohydrate) (15 g) to relieve symptoms 4. Retest in 15 minutes to ensure the BG >4.0 mmol/L and retreat (see above) if needed 5. Eat usual snack or meal due at that time of day or a snack with 15 g carbohydrate plus protein Hypoglycemia and Driving Safe blood glucose (BG) prior to driving BG ≥ 5.0 mmol/L • If BG <5.0 mmol/L prior to driving: – Take 15 g carbohydrate – Re-check in 15 minutes – When BG >5 mmol/L for at least 45 minutes safe to drive • Need to re-check BG every 4 hours of continuous driving and carry simple carbohydrate snacks Iain S. Begg et al . Canadian Journal of Diabetes. 2003;27(2):128-140. Diabetes Complications Macrovascular Cerebral vascular disease 2-4 fold increase in CV mortality & stroke Microvascular Retinopathy Leading cause of blindness in working-age adults Coronary artery disease 8/10 will die from a CV event Nephropathy Leading cause of ESRD Erectile Dysfunction Peripheral vascular disease Peripheral Neuropathy Leading cause of non-traumatic LEA Foot problems C J Diabetes (2008); 32(suppl1): S1-S201 Who Should Receive Statins? 2013 • • • • ≥40 yrs old or Macrovascular disease or Microvascular disease or DM >15 yrs duration and age >30 years or • Warrants therapy based on the 2012 Canadian Cardiovascular Society lipid guidelines Among women with childbearing potential, statins should only be used in the presence of proper preconception counseling & reliable contraception. Stop statins prior to conception. Who Should Receive ACEi or ARB Therapy? 2013 • ≥55 years of age or • Macrovascular disease or • Microvascular disease At doses that have shown vascular protection (ramipril 10 mg daily, perindopril 8 mg daily, telmisartan 80 mg daily) Among women with childbearing potential, ACEi or ARB should only be used in the presence of proper preconception counseling & reliable contraception. Stop ACEi or ARB either prior to conception or immediately upon detection of pregnancy Summary of Pharmacotherapy for Hypertension in Patients with Diabetes Threshold equal or over 130/80 mmHg and Target below 130/80 mmHg With Nephropathy, CVD or CV risk factors ACE Inhibitor or ARB Diabetes Without the above 1. ACE Inhibitor or ARB or 2. Thiazide diuretic or DHP-CCB Combination of 2 first line drugs may be considered as initial therapy if the blood pressure is >20 mmHg systolic or >10 mmHg diastolic above target > 2-drug combinations Monitor serum potassium and creatinine carefully in patients with CKD prescribed an ACEI or ARB Combinations of an ACEI with an ARB are specifically not recommended in the absence of proteinuria More than 3 drugs may be needed to reach target values If Creatinine over 150 µmol/L or creatinine clearance below 30 ml/min ( 0.5 ml/sec), a loop diuretic should be substituted for a thiazide diuretic if control of volume is desired 2013 Vascular Protection Checklist A • A1C – optimal glycemic control (usually ≤7%) B • BP – optimal blood pressure control (<130/80) C • Cholesterol – LDL ≤2.0 mmol/L if decided to treat D • Drugs to protect the heart A – ACEi or ARB │ S – Statin │ A – ASA if indicated E • Exercise – regular physical activity, healthy diet, achieve and maintain healthy body weight S • Smoking cessation Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Checklist 2013 SCREEN regularly with random urine albumin creatinine ratio (ACR) and serum creatinine for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) DIAGNOSE with repeat confirmed ACR ≥2.0 mg/mmol and/or eGFR <60 mL/min DELAY onset and/or progression with glycemic and blood pressure control and ACE-inhibitor or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB) PREVENT complications with “sick day management” counselling and referral when appropriate 2013 ACR ≥2.0 mg/mmol CKD in Diabetes and / or eGFR <60 mL/min Stages of Diabetic Nephropathy Note: change in definition of microalbuminuria ACR ≥2.0 mg/mmol 2013 Beware of Transient Albuminuria Reducing Progression of Diabetic Nephropathy • Optimal glycemic control • Optimal blood pressure control • ACE-inhibitor (ACEi) or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB) guidelines.diabetes.ca | 1-800-BANTING (226-8464) | diabetes.ca Copyright © 2013 Canadian Diabetes Association Counsel all Patients About Sick Day Medication List 2013 Retinopathy Screening Reduces Risk of Blindness (T1DM) Retinopathy is rare in prepubertal children Screen annually in T1DM, 5 years after onset in individuals ≥15 years of age Screening Reduces Risk of Blindness (T2DM) Retinopathy may be present in 21-39% of patients with T2DM at diagnosis Screen every 1-2 years in T2DM beginning at diagnosis 2013 Retinopathy Checklist SCREEN regularly DELAY onset and progression with glycemic and blood pressure control ± fibrate TREAT established disease with laser photocoagulation, intra-ocular injection of medications or vitreoretinal surgery FIELD: Retinopathy Requiring Laser 10 Cumulative risk (%) 8 HR = 0.70 95% CI = 0.58–0.85 p = 0.0003 6 Placebo 4 Fenofibrate 2 0 0 1 2 3 4 Years from randomization FIELD Study Investigators. Lancet 2005 ; 366 (9500): 1849-61 5 6 Risk Factors for Progression • • • • • • • • Longer duration of diabetes Elevated A1C Hypertension Dyslipidemia Low hemoglobin level Pregnancy (with T1DM) Proteinuria Severe retinopathy itself Neuropathy In people with type 2 diabetes, screening for peripheral neuropathy should begin at diagnosis of diabetes and occur annually thereafter. In people with type 1 diabetes, annual screening should commence after 5 years’ postpubertal duration of diabetes [Grade D, Consensus]. 40-50% of People with DM will have Detectable Neuropathy within 10 years • Sensorimotor poly- or mono-neuropathy • Increased risk for: – Foot ulceration and amputation – Neuropathic pain – Significant morbidity – Usage of health care resources Risk Factors • • • • • Elevated blood glucose Elevated triglycerides High BMI Smoking Hypertension Screening Refer to neurology if non-diabetic neuropathy is suspected Neuropathy • Screen – 5 years after dx for Type 1 diabetes – At dx for Type 2 diabetes • Method – Vibration sense on big toe – Monofilament testing • Treatment – Optimize glycemic control – Antidepressant, anticonvulsants, opioids, topical agents can be considered Foot care • By individual AND health care professional • Screening at least annually and more often if high risk • Evaluate for structural abnormalities, neuropathy, PVD, ulcerations, infection • If high risk, provide foot care education, professionally fitted footwear, early referral to professional trained in foot care • Advise to stop smoking • If foot ulcer is present, need multidisciplinary team Question • What percentage of people with diabetes and established coronary artery disease have NO chest pain/symptoms of angina? 1) 10-30% 2) 20-50% 3) 40-70% 4) 50-80% Screening for Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Checklist 2013 SCREEN with baseline resting ECG in select patients STRESS TESTING for patients with symptoms or other associated diseases REFER patients with inducible ischaemia to a cardiac specialist Who Should be Screened with ECG? Age >40 years Duration of DM >15 years + Age >30 years End organ damage – Microvascular – Macrovascular Cardiac risk factors Baseline resting ECG Repeat every 2 years Who Should have Stress Testing and/or Functional Imaging to Screen for CAD? Typical or atypical cardiac symptoms Associated diseases: – – – – PAD Carotid bruits TIA Stroke Resting ECG abnormalities (e.g. Q waves) Exercise ECG stress testing If cannot exercise or resting ECG abnormality present: – – Pharmacologic stress echo Pharmacologic stress nuclear imaging Special populations … 2013 Diabetes in the Elderly Checklist ASSESS for level of functional dependency (frailty) INDIVIDUALIZE glycemic targets based on the above (A1C ≤ 8.5% for frail elderly) but if otherwise healthy, use the same targets as younger people AVOID hypoglycemia in cognitive impairment SELECT antihyperglycemic therapy carefully caution with sulfonylureas or thiazolidinediones Basal analogues instead of NPH or human 30/70 insulin Premixed insulins instead of mixing insulins separately GIVE regular diets instead of “diabetic diets” or nutritional formulas in nursing homes Add an agent best suited to the individual (agents listed in alphabetical order): Class Relative A1C Lowering Hypoglycemia Weight -glucosidase inhibitor (acarbose) Rare Neutral to Improved postprandial control, GI side-effects to Rare Rare neutral • Yes Incretin agents: DPP-4 Inhibitors GLP-1 receptor agonists Insulin Insulin secretagogue: Meglitinide Sulfonylurea Yes* Yes Thiazolidinediones Rare Weight loss agent (orlistat) None Other therapeutic considerations Cost $$ May use detemir or glargine instead of$$$ NPH or human 30/70 for less hypos $$$$ GI side-effects • Premixed insulins and prefilled insulin pens instead of mixing insulin to reduce No dose ceiling, $-$$$$ dosing errorsflexible regimens • CAUTION in the elderly *Less hypoglycemia in context of • Initial doses = HALF ofrequires usual dose missed meals but usually $$ • Avoid TID to QIDglyburide dosing $ • Use gliclazide, gliclazideassociated MR, glimepiride, Gliclazide and glimepiride or repaglinide withnateglinide less hypoglycemia than instead glyburide • CAUTION in the elderly CHF, edema, fractures, rare bladder • Increased risk of fractures cancer (pioglitazone), cardiovascular • Increased(rosiglitazone), risk of heart failure controversy 6-12 weeks required for maximal effect $$ GI side effects $$$ Need a PRECONCEPTION checklist for women with preexisting diabetes 1. Attain a preconception A1C of ≤ 7.0% (if safe) 2. Assess for and manage any complications 3. Switch to insulin if on oral agents 4. Folic Acid 5 mg/d: 3 mo pre-conception to 12 weeks post-conception 5. Discontinue potential embryopathic meds: Ace-inhibitors/ARB (prior to or upon detection of pregnancy) Statin therapy 2013 OBJECTIVES/SUMMARY • 1. Review highlights from the 2013 Canadian Diabetes Association Guidelines including diagnostic criteria and treatment goals • 2. Discuss anti-hyperglyemic agent options after Metformin, focussing on newer medication options • 3. Explore the complications of Diabetes and examine vascular protective strategies in individuals with Diabetes THANK YOU!