Indira Awaas Yojana
Performance Review Committee
9th July 2015
Housing for All – Proposed Design
• House size enhanced to 25m^2
• Government assistance proposed to be enhanced
• Use of SECC 2011 - Allocation of resources & Identification of
beneficiaries
• Gram Panchayat based saturation approach • Convergence – Over and above unit cost
– SBM (G)
– MGNREGS – unskilled wage component
– Other relevant schemes
• District material banks & facilitation centers
• DBT – PFMS & Aadhaar linking
• Monitoring
– Geo referenced time stamped photos captured through mobile app
– AwaasSoft
Challenges
In existing measures
• Inadequate efforts towards convergence with NREGS & SBM
• States still lagging in use of AwaasSoft
• Delays in the roll – out of PFMS – States slow in meeting
prerequisites and challenges at the central level
• Procedure for use of SECC data being finalised - States to finalise list
Initiatives required
Creating access to
• Location specific design & technology
• Construction materials at affordable rates
• Institutional credit
• Skilled and semi-skilled man power
Convergence
• In 2015-16 all beneficiaries must recieve benefits under
NREGS & SBM
• Generation of work and muster roll in NREGASoft
linked to Sanction of houses in AwaasSoft
• Capturing of job card number and SBM Unique ID
during registration to be made mandatory
lacklustre progress
Use of MIS
• Use of AwaasSoft is mandatory – Ministry to monitor progress based on
MIS reports
• Reporting through physical copies and online MPR discontinued as on
30.04.2015
• Non - negotiables
– Number & proportion of instalments to be fixed for the year
– All sanctions to be made before – December 31st,2015
• Use MIS for regular monitoring of progress at State/District level
• States should use administrative funds to hire and train man power in
use of AwaasSoft
• Reporting of Special projects to be done as on priority
PFMS – Status
Progress in meeting the pre-requisites
States yet to start work
Himachal, Haryana, Punjab, Kerala, Maharashtra,
Manipur, Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram, Nagaland, Sikkim
Register State level debit Bihar, Chhattisgarh, J & K, MP, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, UP,
A/C with PFMS
West Bengal, Assam, Tripura
Register DSCs
Enrol DSCs
Activate DSCs
Freeze beneficiary A/C
details
Goa, Gujarat, J & K, Rajasthan, Meghalaya,
Goa, Gujarat, J & K, Rajasthan, Meghalaya, Tamil Nadu,
UP, Uttarakhand, Assam,
Bihar, Chhattisgarh, J & K, MP, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, UP,
West Bengal, Assam, Tripura, Uttarakhand, Meghalaya
UP, Meghalaya, Tripura
Training in use of PFMS can begin only when pre-requisites are met
Use of SECC 2011
Stage 1 : Identification of eligible beneficiaries – At State/District
Exclusion process – All households fulfilling any two of the 14 exclusion
parameters would be automatically excluded
List of eligible households (the universe) - Houseless and households living in
zero/one/two room houses with kutcha roof and kutcha walls
Priority list - Households in the category wise list ( SC, ST, Minority, Others) for
every Gram Panchayat should be ranked based on their scores
Sl.
No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Parameter
Weight
Destitute / living on alms
Households with transgender persons
If a member of the household is from a Primitive Tribal Group, a
legally released bonded labourer, a manual scavenger
Women headed households with no adult male member between
age 16 and 59
Households with no adult member between age 16 and 59
Any member with a disability
1
1
1
1
1
1
Use of SECC 2011
Finalisation of Annual Select list - Gram Sabha
• Priority households to be considered for inclusion
• Households with widows and next-of-kin of members of
defence/paramilitary /police forces killed in action
• Households where a member is suffering from leprosy or cancer
• People living with HIV
• Elevation of a household to a higher rank or Removal can be
made with proper justification being recorded
• Approved Annual select list should be disseminated and
aggregated to the district and State level for monitoring
Documentation of designs &
technology
Creation of compendium of appropriate design typologies and
technology for all districts
• Studies conducted in – Tripura, Meghalaya, Maharashtra,
Odisha, Bihar, Himachal Pradesh
• Consultative workshops held in – Tripura & Meghalaya
• Exercise proposed in
– IIT Delhi – J & K, Rajasthan, Uttarakhand, Chhattisgarh
– UNDP – Assam, West Bengal, Sikkim, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh,
Jharkhand, Manipur
• These exercise would lead to regional type designs which
can be offered to selected beneficiaries
• Some states have taken similar initiatives. This may also be
shared with the Ministry
Facilitation
Capacity building
•
Need to train masons &other artisans to enable construction of the targeted
number of houses and to ensure good construction practices
•
Curriculum and certification process under development
•
Identifying training & certifying agencies, processes and delivery mechanism for
capacity building
•
Enabling progression of workers from unskilled to semi skilled to skilled levels
Access to affordable material
•
States to explore options for bulk procurement esp. for cement & steel
•
Cement - Platform for infrastructure and materials provider www.inampro.nic.in
•
Production of materials such as bricks through NREGA
Mobile app
• Android based application for inspection of houses
• Captures the geographical coordinates and time & date
of capture
• Can be used by officers/beneficiary/facilitator
• Photos captured to be verified by block/district office
and approve sanction of subsequent instalment to the
beneficiary
(Demonstration)
Social Audit
• IAY to be audited along with NREGA
• All houses under the scheme – normal & special projects to be
covered
•
Use of administrative funds for the purpose
• States to nominate officers for NIRD trainings scheduled in
August
Progress 2015-16
• Decision of fund sharing pattern awaited for finalising targets
• Release of first instalments pending for Kerala, Punjab, J & K,
Manipur, Uttarakhand
• All sanctions to be done through AwaasSoft and all funds to
be disbursed through PFMS
• Sanctions have been issued in – Bihar, Gujarat, Jharkhand,
Kerala, Manipur, Odisha, Rajasthan & West Bengal
Progress 2014-15
State
% of
beneficiari
es availed
2nd inst.
State
% of
beneficiari
es availed
2nd inst.
AP & Telangana
Mizoram
Tamil Nadu
Karnataka
West Bengal
Odisha
Maharashtra
Kerala
100.00
99.83
90.03
85.06
71.44
60.27
59.24
56.26
Assam
Gujarat
Rajasthan
Manipur
Jharkhand
Bihar
Uttar Pradesh
Goa
30.50
28.91
19.06
17.39
6.64
6.12
6.05
1.28
Haryana
Tripura
Uttarakhand
Sikkim
Chhattisgarh
50.59
50.39
43.90
42.37
41.90
Himachal Pradesh
Meghalaya
Jammu & Kashmir
0.87
0.22
0.05
• Payments to sanctions made
in 2014-15 & earlier to flow
through existing mechanisms
• Funds available with
districts/blocks to be
exhausted before drawing
from State central account
• Closer monitoring to ensure
completion
Completions in 2014-15
States
Sanction
Completion
%
completion
States
TRIPURA
9445
23056
241.42 TAMIL NADU
GUJARAT
31567
65355
305
1093
287094
493874
MEGHALAYA
7418
10076
KARNATAKA
102962
104098
RAJASTHAN
96980
92069
91.14 MANIPUR
TELANGANA
65149
57437
85.33 MAHARASHTRA
SIKKIM
2286
1538
KERALA
50129
46448
1332
1114
CHATTISGARH
27751
JHARKHAND
ANDHRA PRADESH
GOA
BIHAR
NAGALAND
ASSAM
Sanction Completion
%
completion
44796
28869
54.03
191.63 UTTAR PRADESH
372176
220739
51.90
186.52 WEST BENGAL
386486
182128
42.08
78813
45465
39.47
119.48 UTTARAKHAND
9186
4196
36.67
109.58 HIMACHAL PRADESH
4688
1620
34.56
927
1248
26.79
170923
45082
23.94
83.86 MIZORAM
279
276
21.35
78.65 HARYANA
26889
7196
20.70
75.27 ANDAMAN & NICOBAR
78
148
17.07
27274
63.59 JAMMU & KASHMIR
74
1736
12.87
20649
30681
61.73 ORISSA
18831
11474
7.14
76330
46722
59.70 ARUNACHAL PRADESH
227
110
5.45
157688
99704
54.43 PUNJAB
2782
1911
3.37
176.22 MADHYA PRADESH
Completions include houses sanctioned on MIS since 2013-14 onwards and the special projects
Action on CAG Report
States from where replies have Chhattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, Maharashtra,
been received
Meghalaya, Mizoram, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Uttar
Pradesh, Uttarakhand& Nagaland (10 States)
States from where replies Andhra Pradesh (1), Arunachal Pradesh(10), Bihar (17),
received partly or revised Goa (9), Gujarat (2), Karnataka (18), Kerala (10),
replies sought
Odisha (7), Punjab (4), Tripura (9), West Bengal (11),
Lakshadweep (8) (12 States/UTs)
States which have not sent Assam, Haryana, Jammu& Kashmir, Jharkhand,
replies so far
Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Andaman & Nicobar Island,
Daman & Diu (8 States/UTs)
(Figures in brackets denote No. of paras for which replies/revised replies are still awaited)
Public Accounts Committee to examine report
– States to expedite action taken reports
Complaints/cases pending
State
Assam
Bihar
Gujarat
Jammu & Kashmir
Jharkhand
Complaints
pending
17
22
1
1
4
West Bengal
State
Madhya Pradesh
Orissa
Rajasthan
Tamil Nadu
Uttar Pradesh
Complaints
pending
2
8
4
1
36
4
Court cases pending
Govt. of Assam
Writ Petition (C) No. 3757 of 2014 filed by Shri Bhaban
Das and others in the High Court of Assam
Govt. of Maharashtra Writ Petition filed by Shri Gangaram Patil and others in
the High Court of Maharashtra, Aurangabad Bench
Govt. of Karnataka
WP No. 19193/2012 in the High Court of Karanataka
Govt. of Bihar
WP (C) 287/13 in Mohammad Shahid Anwar in the
Supreme court of India
Thank you…