Subcontracting Supply-chain Fees and Charges Policy Annex A

advertisement

Subcontracting Supply-chain Fees and Charges Policy Annex A

Overview of Subcontracting Approach

Overview of Rutland County Council / Rutland Adult Learning Service Subcontracting

Approach

1. Introduction

1.1. In order to ensure that a consistent and transparent approach to subcontracting is followed, this overview sets out the considerations to be undertaken prior to, during and subsequent to any procurement process. This approach is consistent with:

 ‘Subcontracting for the first time: seeking written approval from the Skills Funding

Agency’ (Skills Funding Agency, November 2013)

 ‘Supply Chain Management: A good practice guide for the post-16 skills sector’

(Learning and Skills Improvement Service, 2012).

1.2. The reasons for consideration of subcontracting are set out in the overarching policy to which this overview is an annex. They are:

Increase the variety of learning opportunities in Rutland and the surrounding area;

Develop opportunities to meet the needs of learners and employers in new and emerging areas of delivery;

Meet the local and regional economic agenda, especially as expressed by the

Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP);

Ensure that standards, quality and value for money are maintained in niche areas.

Whilst this list is not intended to be exhaustive, these key considerations will be at the heart of any proposal to subcontract delivery of provision.

1.3. The process for undertaking a procurement process are set out in the Supply Chain

Management good practice guide and the associated flow chart is reproduced on the next page. The remainder of this document sets out Rutland County Council’s approach to the various steps identified therein.

2. Identifying the need to subcontract

2.1. The need to subcontract is likely to be determined either as a result of the on-going curriculum planning process, where it may become clear that there are gaps in capacity within the existing structure of the Rutland Adult Learning Service (RALS) that cannot be economically addressed through recruitment or other approaches; as a result of the need to address shortfalls in performance against funding targets or to ensure the utilisation of additional funding that may be allocated by the Skills

Funding Agency (the Agency) as part of its allocation review process.

2.2. Where existing subcontractors exist and may have the capacity to undertake the delivery of provision relevant to the needs of the service and of local people, RALS may request the submission of a business case for the delivery of additional learning opportunities.

2.3. If existing subcontract arrangements do not allow for the delivery of appropriate programmes, or if there is a particular niche or geographically-specific provision

Subcontracting Supply-chain Fees and Charges Policy Annex A

Overview of Subcontracting Approach required that an existing subcontractor cannot fulfil, then RALS will seek to engage new partners for the delivery of provision to meet need.

Subcontracting: Process Flowchart

3. Identifying Potential Suppliers, Inviting Tender Proposals, Determining Capability and Contracting

3.1. Where existing providers exist within the supply chain, providers will be alerted to opportunities to bid for additional work on the basis of a business case. In all cases,

Subcontracting Supply-chain Fees and Charges Policy Annex A

Overview of Subcontracting Approach such providers will be asked to complete a standardised questionnaire that will be assessed using pre-determined criteria. This will ensure that all submissions are judged on a level footing against their own particular merits. Providers already in the supply chain will already have passed a Pre-Qualification Questionnaire (PQQ) process and as such will already be deemed to be a suitable partner.

3.2. In addition, it may be necessary or desirable to provide opportunities for new entrants to the supply chain, in order to further develop capacity or to address niche areas as explained above. In such cases, opportunities will be advertised via the

‘Source’ website and will be invited in the first instance to undertake a PQQ through which their suitability as a potential bidder will be assessed. Only if the PQQ is satisfactorily assessed will bidders be invited to take further part in the process.

3.3. In all cases, where new or existing providers are seeking to subcontract provision from Rutland County Council for the delivery of Agency programmes, a proposal will be required that will set out how the provider intends to deliver against the advertised opportunity. The proposal will vary depending on the size of the contract to be awarded and the nature of work to be undertaken but is likely to cover issues such as:

 The provider’s existing provision and capability;

The business plan relating to the proposed work;

The experience of the provider in terms of management and quality assurance;

The proposed staffing model;

Timelines for delivery against the contract;

 The provider’s assessment of the social value of the delivery;

Business continuity plans.

3.4. In keeping with the Supply Chain Management guidelines provided by LSIS, the following core components of the contract will be agreed:

3.4.1. The sub-contractor profile (i.e. the financial profile, based on the allocation profile as notified to the prime contractor by the Agency);

3.4.2. The subcontractor’s duties in relation to the contract, including Key

Performance Indicators (KPIs);

3.4.3. The prime contractor’s duties in relation to the contract;

3.4.4. The services offered by the prime contractor in relation to the management and development of the sub-contracted work;

3.4.5. The prime contractor management and service charges based on due diligence results;

3.4.6. The contract volume and value.

3.5. The contract will be signed by approved representatives of both parties and will be subject to on-going amendment to reflect in-year changes to Agency Funding Rules.

3.6. To ensure that the contracts are framed appropriately within the law and within the requirements of the Agency, they will be checked by a legal adviser prior to final approval and signing.

4. Performance Management

4.1. To ensure that any contract performs as intended and in line with the agreed performance measures, a robust and transparent process for contract monitoring, review and evaluation will be agreed between the prime contractor and subcontractor in line with the identified level of risk that is inherent in the contract.

Subcontracting Supply-chain Fees and Charges Policy Annex A

Overview of Subcontracting Approach

4.2. The nature of activities to be undertaken as part of the performance management process will vary according to the subcontractor, the type of programme delivered, the geographic location of delivery and other relevant factors. Any activities that are undertaken will be formally recorded and the records will be shared across all parties to a contract.

4.3. The activities may include, but are not limited to:

4.3.1. Monitoring activities

Regular conference calls and / or visits;

Examination of Management Information and Funding Claims;

Support visits (especially to monitor implementation of agreed actions).

4.3.2. Review activities

Quarterly or termly formal meetings;

Desktop, point-by-point review of all contract elements;

Planning of future actions.

4.3.3. Evaluation activities

Annual assessments and audits (including self-assessment);

Examination of contract performance;

The contract renewal decision-making process.

4.4. At the commencement of any sub-contract, management fees will be agreed that reflect the costs incurred by the prime contractor in undertaking these duties, in continuing to act as the main point of contact with Ofsted and the Agency in relation to the contracted funds and for the provision of any additional services or activities in support of the contract. This charge will be weighted according to risk and a part of the contract renewal process will be the re-evaluation of risk factors to determine the correct level of management / service fees for the following 12 month period.

5. Risk Assessment

5.1. Prior to the agreement of the initial contract, any sub-contractor will be subject to a risk assessment that will seek to identify the major threats to the successful delivery of the contract and will therefore inform the approach to performance management that in turn will determine the level of management charge attributable to the contract. This will be discussed and agreed with any sub-contractor as part of the process leading up to the agreement of a contract.

5.2. It would be anticipated that as a contract matures, continual improvement measures will be delivered that will lessen the risk and therefore reduce the level of performance management activity required. However, it is also possible that for a variety of reasons, such as organisational change or poor performance against a contract, risk could increase; therefore, the level of risk associated with a given sub-

5.3. Risk factors may include: contract will be reassessed annually to determine the performance management process (and therefore the management charge) for the following year.

The duration of the contract;

Subcontracting Supply-chain Fees and Charges Policy Annex A

Overview of Subcontracting Approach

The value of the contract;

The industry types / vocational areas of programme delivery;

Considerations for health and safety / equal opportunities;

The nature of outputs required of the sub-contractor;

Rates of non-completion, drop-out and / or achievement;

The staff turnover of the sub-contractor;

The sensitivity or political profile of the programme;

The subcontractor’s track record;

The degree of innovation required in delivery of programmes;

The underlying policy agenda;

The relative importance of the sub-contractor to the prime contractor;

Publicity and media implications.

5.4. Any relevant factors from this list, together with any further relevant factors as apply to a given sub-contract, will be assessed against a standardised method in order to determine the risk banding to be assigned to a given contract.

6. Oversight of Sub-contracting Processes

6.1. To ensure that approaches to sub-contracting provision are compliant with relevant legislation as well as with internal Rutland County Council policies, advice and support will be sought by any staff involved in the investigation and establishment of sub-contracting arrangements. This support may be sourced from:

The Rutland County Council Contracts and Procurement Team;

Welland Procurement.

Download