A Study of Habitat Preference by Different Types of Frogs in Vernal Pools in Massachusetts By Andrew Kalaris and Rebecca Zoller Two Frogs Studied GREEN FROG vs. WOOD FROG Distribution Green frogs are widely distributed in Canada from Nova Scotia west through Quebec and southern Ontario (Degraaf and Yamasaki 2001). Their range covers the eastern half of the United States, occurring as far west as eastern Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, Oklahoma, and Texas (Klemens 1993). They range as far southeast as northern Florida. http://www.uri.edu/cels/nrs/paton/LH_gree n_frog.html Wood frogs range farther north than any other amphibian in North America, reaching 69° latitude within the Arctic Circle (Martof and Humphries 1959; Klemens 1993). Their northern range limit corresponds with the edge of the northern limit of spruce forests. Wood frogs are found throughout the northeastern United States, the Great Lakes, and throughout Canada into Alaska; their range covers approximately four million square miles (Martof and Humphries 1959). They also range south along the Appalachian Plateau to extreme northern Georgia, and eastern Tennessee and Kentucky, with disjunct populations occur in Alabama, Arkansas, and Missouri (Klemens 1993). http://www.uri.edu/cels/nrs/paton/LH_wood _frog.html Habitat Preference Green frogs are found in: Swamps Wooded swamps Ponds Lakes Marshes Bogs Banks of slow moving rivers and streams (http://animaldiversity.ummz.u mich.edu/site/accounts/inform ation/Rana_clamitans.html) Wood Frogs are found in: Woodlands during the summer Under stones, stumps, leaf litter in winter Wood ponds and vernal pools while breeding (http://animaldiversity.ummz.u mich.edu/site/accounts/inform ation/Rana_sylvatica.html) Description Green Frogs: “Green frogs are green, greenish brown, brownish, yellowish green and olive, with some rare individuals being blue. They are generally brighter in front with small irregular black spots. Their legs have dark transverse bands. They are yellowish or white below, and males usually have a bright yellow throat. The tympanum (eardrum) is large; in males the tympanum is much larger than the eye and females tend to have a tympanum the same size as the eye. The dorso-lateral ridge is well defined and extends from the back of the eye posteriorly down the body. The toes are well webbed and the first fingers do not extend beyond the second. The tibia and femur are equal to ½ of the body length, which is 7.5 to 12.5 cm for adults. ” http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/acco unts/information/Rana_clamitans.html Wood Frogs: “Wood frogs range from 3.5 to 7.6 cm. Females are much larger than males. This species exhibits a number of color morphs, usually browns, tans and rust, but can also be found in shades of green and gray. In all cases however, they can be distinguished by a black patch that extends over the tympanum to the base of the front limb. It is this characteristic that causes them to be referred to as the frog with the "robber's mask". They are also known to have a white spot on the upper lip. Most specimens have a light yellowish brown middorsal lateral fold. The underparts of the frogs are yellowish and sometimes greenish-white, with male frogs having more brilliant colors on the ventral aspect of the legs.” http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/ accounts/information/Rana_sylvatica.html Food Habits Green Frogs eat: Insects and small invertebrates – slugs, snails, crayfish, spiders, flies, caterpillars, snakes, and frogs from the water and land Wood Frogs eat: Insects and other small invertebrates – spiders, beetles, bugs, slugs, snails Reproduction Green Frog “Green frogs breed in semi-permanent or permanent freshwater habitats of various sizes and vegetation structure. Typical breeding sites include lakes, ponds, margins of rivers, streams, bogs, swamps, and vernal ponds with long hydroperiods” http://www.uri.edu/cels/nrs/paton/LH_ green_frog.html Wood Frog “Wood frogs prefer forested vernal pools (semi-permanent and temporary flooded ponds) for breeding. However, observers have noted wood frogs breeding in grassy pasture ponds, ditches, fens, wooded swamps, flooded meadows (Klemens 1993) and, in Maine, abandoned beaver flowages, old gravel pits, cattail swamps, and slow moving streams (Knox 1999). The common characteristic amongst these waterbodies is that they are typically fishless. Wood frogs bred in both closed and open-canopy wetlands” http://www.uri.edu/cels/nrs/paton/LH_ wood_frog.html Areas of Study We selected two areas of study, the Landfill vernal pool and the shallows of Lake Romeyn to set our traps. We checked the traps the 21st, 22nd, and 23rd of May, 2005. The weather was cold during the times we attempted to catch frogs Results We caught two fish – but no frogs. The unusually cold spring clearly killed or caused many frogs to remain inactive. Disturbance might have scared off the frogs when we attempted to catch them using nets In retrospect, we should have increased the length of time we set traps in, to avoid this type of massive bias and error. Setting more traps in more pools would have given us a better chance to collect some amount of data.