Current strategies for the management of treatment naïve and treatment-experienced patients Mark S. Sulkowski, MD Medical Director, Viral Hepatitis Center Divisions of Infectious Diseases and Gastroenterology/Hepatology Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore, Maryland Overview Treatment-Naive Data and Regimens Treatment-Experienced Data and Regimens Futility Rules Adverse Effects SVR in Treatment-Naive HCV Genotype-1 Infection 100 SVR (%) 80 70%–79% 60 45% 40 20 0 30% 10% IFN1 IFN + RBV1 PEG IFN + RBV2,3 PEG IFN + RBV + PI4,5 Abbreviations: IFN, interferon; PEG IFN, peginterferon; PI, protease inhibitor; RBV, ribavirin. 1. McHutchison JG, et al. Semin Liver Dis. 1999;19:57-65. 2. Manns MP, et al. Lancet. 2001;358:958-965. 3. Fried MW, et al. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:975-982. 4. Jacobson IM, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2405-2416. 5. Poordad F, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1195-1206. Graphic courtesy of Dr. David R. Nelson. Standard of Care for HCV Genotype 1 Boceprevir or Telaprevir in combination with PEG IFN/RBV Adults with compensated liver disease, including cirrhosis – Treatment-naive – Failed previous interferon-based therapy Must not be used as monotherapy Incivek [package insert]. Cambridge, MA: Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated; 2011. Victrelis [package insert]. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Schering Corporation; 2011. Resistance Develops Rapidly During Monotherapy with Protease Inhibitor Telaprevir Dosing Telaprevir Dosing 8 Patient 1018 6 4 LOD 2 0 Log10 HCV RNA (IU/mL) Log10 HCV RNA (IU/mL) 8 Patient 1002 6 4 LOD 2 0 1 Days 14 HCV RNA (>100 IU/mL) Wild-type T54A V36A/M Kieffer TL, et al. Hepatology 2007; 46:631-9. 1 R155K/T 36/155 A156V/T 36/156 Days 14 Overview Treatment-Naive Data and Regimens Treatment-Experienced Data and Regimens Futility Rules Adverse Effects Boceprevir—RGT in Treatment-Naive Patients with No Cirrhosis PEG IFN/RBV for 4 weeks, followed by boceprevir 800 mg TID + PEG IFN/RBV HCV RNA TW8 TW24 Undetectable Undetectable Detectable Undetectable Recommendation Administer all 3 drugs through TW28 Administer all 3 drugs through TW36, then administer PEG IFN/RBV through TW48 Abbreviations: RGT, response-guided therapy; TW, treatment week. Victrelis [package insert]. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Schering Corporation; 2011. HCV RNA Assays—“Not Detected” Is Required for Shortened Therapy Below lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) but still “detectable” is not sufficient to shorten therapy—ie, patient should continue for 48 weeks Harrington P, et al. Frequency and Clinical Relevance of Detectable/<LLOQ HCV RNA in Boceprevir and Telaprevir Trials. United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), FDA Division of Antiviral Products; June 30, 2011. SPRINT-2—BOC/PR: Overall SVR and Relapse Rate by Cohort and Treatment Arm SVR 211/ 316 213/ 125/ 311 311 22/ 52 Relapse 29/ 55 12/ 52 21/ 232 18/ 230 37/ 162 3/ 25 Abbreviations: RGT, response-guided therapy; SVR, sustained virologic response. Nonblack N = 938; black N = 159. Poordad F, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1195-1206. 6/ 35 2/ 14 SPRINT-2—BOC/PR: SVR According to HCV RNA Response at Week 8 HCV RNA Undetectable Wk 8 170/ 166/ 48/ 190 182 56 14/ 18 18/ 22 3/ 4 Poordad F, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1195-1206. HCV RNA Detectable Wk 8 38/ 44/ 73/ 104 102 233 8/ 25 8/ 29 8/ 38 44% of all patients eligible for 28 weeks Boceprevir—Treatment-Naive Non-RGT Regimens Poor Interferon Responsiveness1 Consideration should be given to extending treatment for treatment-naive patients with poor interferon responsiveness (< 0.5 or 1-log drop2) at week 4: 4 weeks of P/R followed by 44 weeks of B + P/R Compensated Cirrhosis1 4 weeks of P/R followed by 44 weeks of B + P/R 1. Victrelis [package insert]. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Schering Corporation; 2011. 2. Poordad F, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1195-1206. SPRINT-2—BOC/PR: SVR Based on Week 4 Lead-In Response IFN Responsiveness* Poor IFN Response† 187/ 21/ 228 73 178/ 31/ 218 79 121/ 234 3/62 Nonblacks *Undetectable or ≥1-log decline. †<1-log decline. Poordad F, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1195-1206. 16/ 24 6/ 24 22/ 36 5/ 16 Blacks 12/ 26 SPRINT-2—BOC/PR: SVR in Advanced Fibrosis/Cirrhosis 213/ 319 211/ 313 123/ 328 Poordad F, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1195-1206. 14/ 34 22/ 42 9/ 24 Baseline predictors of SVR: SPRINT-2 Effect Odds Ratio (95% CI) Baseline HCV-RNA: ≤400,000 vs. >400,000 IL-28B rs12979860 genotype: CC vs. TT IL-28B rs12979860 genotype: CC vs. CTa IL-28B rs12979860 genotype: CT vs. TT 11.6 (1.5, 87.8) P value 2.6 (1.3, 5.1) 0.02 0.006 2.1 (1.2, 3.7) 0.01 1.2 (0.7, 2.2) 0.48 Cirrhosis no vs. yes Genotype: 1b vs. 1a 4.3 (1.6, 11.9) 2.0 (1.2, 3.4) 0.004 0.005 Race: non-black vs. black 2.0 (1.1, 3.7) 0.03 BMI ≤ 30 vs. >30 1.6 (1.0, 2.5) 0.07 Poordad et al. Gastroenterology 2012 in press SVR Rate according to IL28B: Boceprevir - SPRINT-2 Poordad F et al. EASL 2011 % Patients with undetectable HCV-RNA by TW8 BOC/PegIFN/RBV: IL-28B polymorphism is a strong predictor of TW8 response 100 89 CC 82 CT + TT 80 60 52 51 40 20 118 132 0 158 304 SPRINT-2 41 50 80 156 RESPOND-2 Predictors of SVR include HCV RNA decline at week 4: SPRINT-2 Odds Ratio (95% CI) P value Baseline HCV-RNA: ≤400,000 vs. >400,000 Decline in HCV-RNA at week 4 (≥ 1 vs. < 1 log10 decline) Cirrhosis no vs. Yes 8.4 (1.0, 68.6) 0.046 8.2 (4.5, 15.0) 3.5 (1.1, 11.3) <.0001 0.04 BMI ≤ 30 vs. >30 2.5 (1.4, 4.2) 0.001 Genotype: 1b vs. 1a/other/missing 2.1 (1.2, 3.6) 0.01 Race: non-black vs. black 1.8 (0.9, 3.6) 0.08 IL-28B rs12979860 genotype: CC vs. TT IL-28B rs12979860 genotype: CC vs. CTa IL-28B rs12979860 genotype: CT vs. TT 1.2 (0.6, 2.7) 0.59 1.1 (0.6, 2.1) 0.76 1.1 (0.6, 2.2) 0.73 Effect Poordad et al. Gastroenterology 2012 in press SPRINT-2: SVR Based on Early Interferon Response % of Patients With SVR PR48 All Patients (Cohort 1 + Cohort 2) BOC/RGT Log10 Viral Load Decrease After 4 week of P/R Lead-in Vierling JM, et al. 46th EASL; Berlin, Germany; March 30-April 3, 2011: Abst. 481. BOC/PR48 HCV RNA suppression after 4 weeks of PegIFN/RBV according to IL28B genotype Poordad et al. Gastroenterology 2012 in press Telaprevir—RGT in Treatment-Naive Patients Telaprevir 750 mg TID, PEG IFN, and RBV starting on day 1 HCV RNA Recommendation Undetectable at TW4 and TW12 Administer all 3 drugs through TW12, then administer PEG IFN/RBV through TW24 Detectable (≤1000 IU/mL) Administer all 3 drugs through at TW4 and/or TW12 TW12, then administer PEG IFN/RBV through TW48 Incivek [package insert]. Cambridge, MA: Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated; 2011. ADVANCE—TVR/PR: Overall RVR, eRVR, and SVR Rates Patients eligible to receive 24 wks of total treatment 246/ 246/ 242/ 242/ 363 363 364 364 (Wk 4) 34/ 34/ 361 361 212/ 29 212/ 207/ 207/ 29 363 /361 363 364 364 /361 (Wk 4 and 12) P <.001 P <.001 271/ 158/ 271/ 250/ 250/ 158/ 363 364 361 363 364 361 (Wk 24 postEOT) Abbreviations: EOT, end of treatment; eRVR, extended rapid virologic response; P, peginterferon; R, ribavirin; RVR, rapid virologic response; SVR, sustained virologic response; T, telaprevir. Jacobson IM, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2405-2416. ILLUMINATE—TVR/PR: SVR and Relapse Rates 388/ 540 149/ 162 SVR 140/ 160 37/469 9/159 Relapse Abbreviations: ITT, intent-to-treat; SVR, sustained virologic response. Sherman KE, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1014-1024. 4/154 ADVANCE: Week 4 HCV RNA not detected according to IL28B genotype SVR according to IL28B: Telaprevir - ADVANCE Jacobson et al. EASL 2011 Telaprevir—Treatment-Naive NonRGT Regimens Compensated Cirrhosis Treatment-naive patients with cirrhosis and undetectable HCV RNA at weeks 4 and 12 may benefit from continuing PEG IFN/RBV through week 48 Incivek [package insert]. Cambridge, MA: Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated; 2011. ADVANCE—TVR/PR: Impact of Host and Viral Factors Results from the T12/PR24 Group 64/ 82 207/ 281 Low* High* 118/ 152/ 149 213 1b 1a Viral Load Genotype *<800,000 IU/mL vs ≥800,000 IU/mL. Jacobson IM, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2405-2416. 244/ 325 16/ 26 109/ 134 32/ 52 Non- Black black F0-2 F3-4 Race Fibrosis Overview Treatment-Naive Data and Regimens Treatment-Experienced Data and Regimens Futility Rules Adverse Effects Treatment-Experienced Patients are Heterogeneous Prior relapsers1 – Undetectable HCV RNA at the end of therapy but detectable during follow-up Prior partial responders1 – ≥2-log drop HCV RNA at week 12 but never undetectable Prior null responders – <2-log drop HCV RNA at week 122,3 Included in telaprevir trials2 Excluded from boceprevir trials; Interferon responsiveness assessed with 4 week lead-in3 1. Ghany MG, et al. Hepatology. 2009;49:1335-1374. 2. Zeuzem S, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:24172428. 3. Bacon BR, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1207-1217. Boceprevir—RGT in Prior Partial Responders or Relapsers Without Cirrhosis PEG IFN/RBV for 4 weeks, followed by boceprevir 800 mg TID + PEG IFN/RBV HCV RNA TW8 TW24 Undetectable Undetectable Detectable Undetectable Recommendation Complete 3-medicine regimen at TW36 Continue all 3 medicines through TW36, then administer PEG IFN/RBV through TW48 Abbreviations: RGT, response-guided therapy; TW, treatment week. Victrelis [package insert]. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Schering Corporation; 2011. RESPOND-2—BOC/PR: Relapsers and Partial Responders 95/ 107/ 17/ 162 161 80 23/ 57 30/ 58 2/29 72/ 77/ 15/ 105 103 51 Abbreviations: B, boceprevir 800 mg TID; P, PEG IFN -2b 1.5 µg/kg/wk; R, ribavirin 600–1400 mg/d; RGT, response-guided therapy; Bacon BR, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1207-1217. Boceprevir—Treatment-Experienced Non-RGT Regimens Compensated Cirrhosis 4 weeks of P/R followed by 44 weeks of B + P/R Null Responders 4 weeks of P/R followed by 44 weeks of B + P/R Victrelis [package insert]. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Schering Corporation; 2011. RESPOND-2—BOC/PR: SVR by Week 4 Lead-In Response to Peginterferon/Ribavirin 15/ 46 15/ 44 80/ 110 90/ 114 17/ 67 Change in HCV RNA from Baseline Abbreviations: B, boceprevir 800 mg TID; P, PEG IFN -2b 1.5 µg/kg/wk; R, ribavirin 600–1400 mg/d; RGT, response-guided therapy. With permission from Bacon BR, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1207-1217. RROVIDE: SVR and Relapse Rates, by Prior Treatment Response 19/47 53/78 5/9 81/138 3/22 9/62 SVR was also achieved in all 4 patients with ‘other’ prior non-response. 1/6 13/94 Telaprevir—RGT in Prior Relapsers Telaprevir 750 mg TID, PEG IFN, and RBV starting on day 1 HCV RNA Recommendation Undetectable at TW4 and TW12 Administer all 3 drugs through TW12, then administer PEG IFN/RBV through TW24 Administer all 3 drugs through Detectable (≤1000 IU/mL) TW12, then administer at TW4 and/or TW12 PEG IFN/RBV through TW48 Incivek [package insert]. Cambridge, MA: Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated; 2011. Telaprevir—Non-RGT in Prior Partial or Null Responders Telaprevir 750 mg TID, PEG IFN, and RBV starting on day 1 Recommendation Administer all 3 drugs through TW12, then administer PEG IFN/RBV through TW48 Incivek [package insert]. Cambridge, MA: Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated; 2011. REALIZE: SVR by Baseline Fibrosis Stage and Prior Response Prior relapsers Prior partial responders Prior null responders Pooled T12/PR48 SVR (%) Pbo/PR48 n/N= 144/167 12/38 Stage No, minimal Bridging or portal fibrosis fibrosis 53/62 2/15 48/57 2/15 34/47 3/17 10/18 0/5 Cirrhosis No, minimal Bridging or portal fibrosis fibrosis Zeuzem S, et al. N Engl J Med 2011;364:2417-27 11/32 1/5 24/59 1/18 15/38 0/9 Cirrhosis No, minimal Bridging or portal fibrosis fibrosis 7/50 1/10 Cirrhosis SVR by Response at Week 4 in Lead-In Arm of REALIZE: HCV RNA at Week 4 in Nonresponders 94 % 62 59 56 54 15 Decline in HCV RNA at week 4 Foster G et al, EASL 2011 Overview Treatment-Naive Data and Regimens Treatment-Experienced Data and Regimens Futility Rules Adverse Effects Boceprevir—Futility (Stopping) Rules STOP ALL DRUGS Week 12 HCV RNA ≥100 IU/mL OR Week 24 HCV RNA confirmed detectable Victrelis [package insert]. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Schering Corporation; 2011. Retrospective Analysis of SPRINT-2 Underscores Validity of BOC Futility Rules • Earliest 100% negative predictive time point for SVR which spared largest number of patients from continuing failing regimen was HCV RNA ≥ 100 IU/mL at Week 12 Stopping Rule Stopped by TW12 Rule, n Additional stopped by TW24 rule , n Total Stopped, n SVR missed using TW12 rule, n > LLD, 9.3 IU/mL 144 20 164 21 > LLQ, 25 IU/mL 83 41 124 5 ≥ 50 IU/mL 78 43 121 4 ≥ 100 IU/mL 65 49 114 0 ≥ 1000 IU/mL 43 61 104 0 < 2 log decline 24 71 95 0 < 3 log decline 34 66 100 0 Jacobson IM, et al. AASLD 2011. Abstract 954. Telaprevir—Futility (Stopping) Rules STOP ALL DRUGS Week 4 and/or Week 12 HCV RNA >1000 IU/mL OR Week 24 HCV RNA confirmed detectable Incivek [package insert]. Cambridge, MA: Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated; 2011. Retrospective Analysis of TVR Ph III Trials Underscores Validity of TVR Futility Rules No pt with HCV RNA > 1000 IU/mL at Wk 4 (n = 25) or Wk 12 (n = 12) had SVR Viral kinetic analysis of pts with HCV RNA > 1000 IU/mL at Wk 4 – – 23 of 25 reached HCV RNA nadir before Wk 4 In most pts, HCV RNA already increasing from nadir by Wk 4 Emergence of TVR-resistant variants in most pts with HCV RNA > 1000 IU/mL at Wk 4 Tx Naive (n = 14) Tx Experienced (n = 11) 108 HCV RNA, IU/mL 107 108 107 106 106 105 105 104 104 103 103 102 102 10 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Wks on Treatment 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Wks on Treatment Level of TVR Resistance Tx-Naive Pts With HCV RNA > 1000 IU/mL at Wk 4, n (n = 14) Tx-Exp’d Pts With HCV RNA > 1000 IU/mL at Wk 4, n (n = 11) V36M + R155K High 12 8 A156S/T/V High 1 0 R155K Low 0 2 Wild type None 1 1 HCV NS3/4A Variant Jacobson IM, et al. EASL 2012. Abstract 55. Overview Treatment-Naive Data and Regimens Treatment-Experienced Data and Regimens Futility Rules Adverse Effects Drug Interactions with Telaprevir and Boceprevir BOC and TVR are CYP3A4 inhibitors Drug interactions may affect blood levels of either PI or Inhibitor co-administered drug AUC Drug + Inhibitor Inhibitor blocks the function of the CYP enzyme Inducer AUC P450 • Caution is needed with ALL co-administered medications – – – – Review package inserts for interaction lists Reconcile patient medication list Patient needs to communicate new meds started by other health care providers Other resource: hcvadvocate.org; hep-druginteractions.org Boceprevir [package insert]. May 2011. Telaprevir [package insert]. March 2012. Ghany MG, et al. Hepatology. 2011;54:1433-1444. Figure adapted from: Back D. Drug-drug interactions (in relation to HCV). Presented at: 7th International Workshop on HIV & Hepatitis Co-infection; June 1-3, 2011; Milan, Italy. Lecture. Drug-Drug Interaction Resource Boceprevir Triple Therapy— Adverse Effects Pooled Data from Treatment-Naive Population (SPRINT-1, SPRINT-2) Adverse Effect Boceprevir + PEG IFN/RBV (n = 1225) PEG IFN/RBV (n = 467) Anemia* 50% 30% Neutropenia 25% 19% Dysgeusia 35% 16% *Anemia was managed with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, with or without RBV dose reduction (boceprevir + PEG IFN/RBV, 43%; PEG IFN/RBV, 24%). Victrelis [package insert]. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Schering Corporation; 2011. Randomized controlled trial: RBV dose reduction Vs. EPO for anemia during BOC + PegIFN/RBV • 687 HCV genotype 1, treatment naïve patients enrolled •Hb at screening < 15 g/dL for men and women • 500 met protocol defined anemia and were randomized: RBV DR, n=249; EPO, n=251 Anemia Management: Erythropoietin vs Ribavirin Dose Reduction Primary and Key Efficacy End Points End-of-treatment response, relapse, and SVR were comparable between RBV DR and EPO arms Patients, % (95% CI) –0.7% (– 8.6 , 7.2)* 203/249 205/251 178/249 178/251 19/196 CI, confidence interval; DR, dose reduction; EOT, end of treatment; EPO, erythropoietin; RBV, ribavirin; SVR, sustained virologic response. *The stratum-adjusted difference (EPO vs RBV DR) in SVR rates, adjusted for stratification factors and protocol cohort. Poordad F et al. 47th EASL; Barcelona, Spain; April 18-22, 2012. Abst. 1419. 19/197 Patients, % Anemia Management: Erythropoietin vs Ribavirin Dose Reduction SVR by Secondary Anemia Intervention Secondary Anemia Intervention DR, dose reduction; EPO, erythropoietin; RBV, ribavirin; SVR, sustained virologic response. Poordad F et al. 47th EASL; Barcelona, Spain; April 18-22, 2012. Abst. 1419. BOC/PR: Exposure-Response Relationships for Anemia % of Pts with Anemia from P05101 and P05216 vs Boceprevir % of Pts with Anemia from P05101 and P05216 vs RBV steady-state AUC Observations were binned as quartiles and plotted at the median quartile value. The total number of subjects with hemoglobin <10 g/dL for each quartile and total number of subjects per quartile bin (in parentheses) are shown along the x-axis. US Food and Drug Administration; April 27, 2011. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/Drugs/AntiviralDrugsAdvisory Committee/UCM252341.pdf. Accessed April 26, 2011. Telaprevir Triple Therapy— Adverse Effects Pooled Data from Treatment-Naive and -Experienced Populations (ADVANCE, ILLUMINATE, REALIZE) Adverse Effect Telaprevir + PEG IFN/RBV (n = 1797) PEG IFN/RBV (n = 493) Rash 56% 34% Anemia* 36% 17% Anorectal Effects 29% 7% *Anemia was managed with RBV dose reduction; ESA not permitted. (Telaprevir + PEG IFN/RBV, 32%; PEG IFN/RBV, 12%). Incivek [package insert]. Cambridge, MA: Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated; 2011. Nadir Hemoglobin, Discontinuation for Anemia, and Median Hemoglobin Levels Hemoglobin nadir during TVR/Pbo Phase T8PR N=364 PR N=361 Hemoglobin <10 g/dL 36 40 14 Hemoglobin <8.5 g/dL 9 9 2 % of Patients with • • Per protocol, anemia was to be managed with RBV dose modifications and ESAs were not allowed 1%, 3% and 1% of patients in T12PR, T8PR and PR, respectively discontinued all drugs due to anemia events TVR …. TVR Median Hemoglobin (g/dL) T12PR N=363 Median Hemoglobin 15 14 T12PR (n=363) T8PR ( (n=364) 13 PR (control) (n=361) 12 11 • 4%, 2% and 0% of patients in T12PR, T8PR and PR, respectively discontinued telaprevir/placebo only 0 0 4 8 12 16 Weeks Jacobson IM, et al.N Engl J Med 2011;364:2405-16 20 24 Telaprevir Treatment-Naïve Studies: RBV dose reduction was common Treatment-naïve Patients From ADVANCE and ILLUMINATE During the Overall Treatment Phase (T12PR, N=885) SVR According to Minimum Ribavirin Dose/Day During Telaprevir Treatment Phase Ribavirin dose reduction: Proportion of Patients who Achieved SVR Treatment Naïve (T12PR) 0-4 Weeks Post First Dose n/N = 160/221 >4-12 Weeks Post First Dose >12-24 Weeks Post First Dose >24-48 Weeks Post First Dose 171/237 85/99 36/43 Timing of First Ribavirin Dose Reduction Sulkowski M et al. 47th EASL; Barcelona, Spain; April 18-22, 2012. Abst. 1162. Advisory Committee Briefing Materials for Telaprevir: RBV Effect on Hemoglobin Toxicity Effect of Ribavirin (RBV) Exposure on Hemoglobin Toxicity Hemoglobin toxicity of Grade 2+ (Grade 2+ Hgb Tx) was defined as Hgb < 10 g/dL or any decrease from baseline >3.5 g/dL. Vertical bars represent rates of Hgb toxicity in each quartile of AUC. The horizontal bar along the AUC axis represents the distribution of AUC 3rd (5%-95%, 1st to 3rd quartile, mean, median). Advisory Committee Briefing Document for NDA 201-917 Telaprevir 375 mg tablets. Silver Spring, MD; April 1, 2011. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/Drugs/AntiviralDrugs AdvisoryCommittee/UCM252561.pdf. Accessed April 26, 2011. Telaprevir—Rash Summary from Pooled Safety Database Rash was primarily eczematous – Mild to moderate in most – Severe rash in 4% – May occur at any time during telaprevir exposure Led to discontinuation of telaprevir in 6% – Serious skin reaction in <1%, including Stevens-Johnson Syndrome or DRESS Treat with oral antihistamines and/or topical corticosteroids – Systemic steroids are not recommended Abbreviation: DRESS, Drug Rash with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms. Incivek [package insert]. Cambridge, MA: Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated; 2011. Severe Rash on Telaprevir Rash Management Rash description Management Mild: Localized, limited distribution, with or without pruritus • Continue all drugs • Monitor for rash progression or development of systemic symptoms • TVR dose should not be reduced or interrupted • Oral antihistamines and /or topical corticosteroids • Systemic corticosteroids not recommended • Good skin care practices Moderate: Diffuse (up to 50% BSA) with or without superficial skin peeling, pruritus, or mucous membrane involvement with no ulceration Severe: Generalized rash involving either >50% BSA or any of the following: • Vesicles or bullae • Superficial ulceration of mucous membranes • Epidermal detachment • Atypical or typical target lesions • Palpable purpura, non-blanching erythema • Discontinue TVR; continue Peg-IFN/RBV • If no improvement within 7 days (or earlier if indicated), consider discontinuation of Peg-IFN and/or RBV • Good skin care practices • Refer to dermatologist • Oral antihistamines and/or topical corticosteroids • Systemic corticosteroids not recommended Serious skin reactions: Toxic epidermal necrolyosis, SJS, DRESS, acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, rash that requires therapy with systemic corticsteroids, erythema multiforme (not lifethreatening) • Discontinue all medications immediately • Refer for urgent medical care Cacoub P, et al. J Hepatol. 2012;56:455-463. Adherence is critical Typical Student Monday Triple therapy presents challenges [143] TID dosing – Food requirements Data show pegIFN/RBV adherence decreases over time[5] – Addition of PIs may exacerbate this trend Monday 6:00 AM TVR/BOC (with food) + RBV TVR/BOC (with food) + RBV 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM – Busy Sales Professional Daily Team Conference Call Patient Appointments English Composition 12:00 PM Lunch Lunch Biology TVR/BOC (with food) 4:00 PM Work TVR/BOC (with food) Travel to and Meet With Clients 5:00 PM Dinner RBV 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 1. Telaprevir [package insert]. May 2011. 2. Boceprevir [package insert]. May 2011. 9:00 PM 3. EMA. Boceprevir [package insert] 2011. 4. EMA. Telaprevir [package insert] 2011. 10:00 PM 5. Lo Re V 3rd, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:353-360. Dentist Appt Patient Appointments TVR/BOC (with food) Calls to Clients 3:00 PM 6:00 PM Travel to and Meet With Client Lunch 1:00 PM 2:00 PM TVR/BOC (with food) + RBV Wake, feed, and dress children for school School and daycare drop-off, commute to work Chemistry Lab 10:00 AM 11:00 AM Mother With Small Children and Full-time Nurse Monday Pick up kids, commute home RBV Running Club Study Group Dinner Researching Trade Articles TVR/BOC (with food) TVR/BOC (with food) Dinner RBV Get children ready for and in to bed Dinner cleanup, make lunches for next day TVR/BOC (with food)