PLANNING, DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION
SOUTH DINING RENOVATION
PROJECT # 09.630.161
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT RISK
(CMAR) SELECTION
PRE-SUBMITTAL MEETING
September 9, 2015
AGENDA
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
NAU Mission & Goals: 2015 and beyond…
South Dining Renovation: Project’s Mission & Goals
Site & Utility Maps
Pre-Construction Phase
Construction Phase
Schedule
Project Cost Assumptions
Sustainability & Total Cost of Ownership
Pre-Construction and Construction Expectations
Other Consultants under Owner
Qualification submittal format
Questions??
2
NAU MISSION & GOALS: 2015 AND BEYOND…
Mission: To provide an outstanding undergraduate residential
education strengthened by research, graduate and professional
programs, and sophisticated methods of distance delivery.
Values:
• Excellence in Education:
Offer a rigorous, high-quality education to all students.
• Student Success:
Place learner needs at the center of our academic and service planning,
policies, and programs.
• Educational Access:
Provide all qualified students with access to higher education.
• Diversity:
Achieve multicultural understanding as a priority of educational and civic life.
• Integrity:
•
Operate with fairness, honesty, and the highest ethical standards to sustain a
community of trust.
Civility: Support a civil, engaging, and respectful campus climate.
3
NAU MISSION & GOALS: 2015 AND BEYOND…
Strategic Goals:
• Student success
• Nationally recognized research excellence
• Global engagement
• Diversity, civic engagement, and community building
• Commitment to Native Americans
• Sustainability and effectiveness
Design a sustainable and effective building that will streamline kitchen and
food service efficiency to the benefit of the students and dining staff.
4
SOUTH DINING RENOVATION
PROJECT’S MISSION & GOALS
South Dining Renovation Mission:
The Mission will be developed with the successful
Design and CMAR Team, NAU stakeholders,
Commissioning Team and NAU PDC Rep’.
The focus of this project from Day 1 will be “Teamwork”.
5
SOUTH DINING RENOVATION
MISSION & GOALS
South Dining Renovation Goals:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Codes upgrades (FLS, ADA, etc…),
Structural repairs,
Building upgrades to create an exceptional dining experience,
Building efficiency,
Flexible/Adaptable Dining Spaces,
Students study/learning areas (as allowed in budget),
Sustainability & Total Cost of Ownership,
Win-Win-Win Team concept for all,
Design and Construction teams engaged at the beginning
and throughout,
• Tight delivery schedule (for both design & construction)
6
SITE MAP
7
SITE MAP
Site considerations:
• Create a sense of community on South Campus
• Proximity of existing student housing facilities
(construction working hours, safety, etc..)
• Food deliveries
• Relocation of utilities as required
• NAU ITS Central Hub for fiber distribution (do not disturb)
• Continuous delivery of food services to students
throughout construction
• Disruption avoidance
• Site logistic plan
8
UTILITY MAP
Utility wise, the entire South Dining
building is fed from same utility points.
9
PRE-CONSTRUCTION PHASE
• Review Pre-construction and Construction
requirements in the RFQ and in DP/CMAR contracts.
• Review the DP’s Agreement so you understand
their responsibilities as well
• Review NAU Design Guidelines & NAU Technical
Standards
• Be ready to submit your Pre-Construction proposal
shortly after CMAR Team selection!!!
10
PRE-CONSTRUCTION PHASE
• Residential Dining is about 28,000 GSF within South
DuBois. The area is sufficient in size but is old,
structurally not sound, the kitchen is all electric, and
overall is not as efficient as it should be… We do not
need to add square footage to the facility.
• CMAR team will be required to investigate a full on
renovation vs total demo and re-construction of the
residential dining, in collaboration with the DP team.
• Decisions on construction phasing options.
• Build a cutting-edge, modern equipment kitchen…
• Retail dining must remain open during this project.
• Subcontractor Selection for design-assist as needed.
• Accurate, real-time estimates throughout pre-con. It
should not take weeks for estimate feedback.
11
SITE MAP
12
PRE-CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Bldg. 64
Not in scope
Basement
13
PRE-CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Bldg. 64
Not in scope
1st Floor
14
PRE-CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Bldg. 64
Not in scope
2nd Floor
15
PRE-CONSTRUCTION PHASE
130’-6”
Bldg. 63
In scope
114’-11”
Basement
16
PRE-CONSTRUCTION PHASE
113’-9”
Bldg. 63
In scope
114’-11”
1st Floor
17
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
• Review the current CMAR NAU contract prior to
submittal as terms & conditions of the contract won’t
be negotiable.
• Review Pre-construction and Construction
requirements in the RFQ and in DP/CMAR contracts.
• Need to maintain Food Service function in the
building (Bldg. 63 and/or 64) or in immediate
proximity of this facility.
• Potentially work construction in phases.
• Students traffic around the project.
• Safety.
• Working hours.
18
SCHEDULE
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DP selected by 9/29/15
CMAR selected by 10/08/15
Assessment/Feasibility/Programming done by 11/13/15
100% Schematic Design done by 12/24/15
100% DD done by 2/26/16
100% CD done by 4/22/16
ABOR Approval at the 6/8/16 Business & Finance meeting
JCCR Approval TBD
Start construction either right after ABOR approval (6/9/16)
if we can start without JCCR’s approval, or after 7/16/16
(after the Explorer 2016 Conference).
• Substantial Completion Date is 7/14/17.
• Open Food Services to Students around mid-August 2017.
19
SCHEDULE
20
PROJECT COST ASSUMPTIONS
• Construction Cost:
$10,500,000 to $14,000,000
• Soft Cost (40%):
$4,500,000 to $6,000,000
o This includes FF&E, DP Fee, Other Owner Costs
• Total Project Cost:
$15,000,000 to $20,000,000
o $15M is for dining, up to $5M additional for student learning space
• Estimated Total Gross Square Footage Range:
o Bldg. 63 (South Dining) =
~ 28,000 GSF
o Potential Students tutoring space =
TBD
21
SUSTAINABILITY &
TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP
• This facility is expected to be LEED Gold Certified.
• CMAR Team (including proposed Sub-Contractors
such as MEP Trades) shall have strong knowledge and
experience with sustainability initiatives relative to this
type of building and with renovation and construction.
• Pre-construction team must have a strong
understanding/experience with energy-efficient HVAC
systems.
• Total Cost of Ownership shall be calculated to
demonstrate that building materials and building
systems will be selected based on most sustainable
criteria.
22
PRECONSTRUCTION & CONSTRUCTION
EXPECTATIONS & TEAM APPROACH
• Collaboration between DP and CMAR for:
o dynamic estimating of construction costs throughout
the design process to prepare cost estimates that
accurately forecast a detailed GMP,
o detailed scheduling around design and construction
efforts. Analyze of phasing options,
o budget and scope management,
o constructability reviews, system reviews and value
engineering.
• Active/Engaged participation with constructability from
Assessment/Programming through Commissioning.
• Experience with achieving low Cost of Ownership
(energy efficient building with adaptability).
23
OTHER CONSULTANTS UNDER OWNER
•
Geo-Tech investigation: as needed
•
Survey: as needed
•
3rd party Estimating Firm: to provide independent
estimating and validation of DP’s and CMAR’s
estimates at Schematic and GMP phases.
•
Commissioning:
Commissioning Agent will be hired by NAU by end of
September and will actively participate in design review
during the pre-construction phase. Both DP and CMAR
will be required to be fully engaged during
commissioning activities at the end of construction.
24
QUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL FORMAT
•
Proposal due date: September 21, 2015 by 3:00 pm
•
1 Original and 8 Copies + 1 Electronic Version
•
Page Count:
o Items A – G cannot exceed 20 pages
o Tabs do not count as pages unless there is content on
them
o Resumes cannot exceed 2 pages each
• Proposed team-member’s projects, not firm’s
projects
o Submittal Certification is 1 page
25
DISQUALIFICATION ITEMS
•
Refer to RFQ for specifics
o Turning in submittal late – if mailing, be mindful of slow
delivery times
o Contacting any NAU employee regarding this project
other than as outlined in the RFQ (Stephanie Bauer)
o Not providing the correct number of submittals or
exceeding the page limit
o Submitting in the wrong location
o Company profiles in Resumes. Resumes should be
about the individual, not the firm
26
SOUTH DINING RENOVATION
PROJECT # 09.630.161
QUESTIONS???
27