Ellipticity-Dependent Magneto-Optical Polarization Rotation via Multi-Photon Coherence George R. Welch Marlan O. Scully Texas A&M University Irina Irina Novikova Novikova Andrey Andrey Matsko Matsko Institute for Quantum Studies M. M. Suhail Suhail Zubairy Zubairy Eugeniy Mikhailov Eugeniy Mikhailov Office of Naval Research Air Force Research Lab Outline: Atomic Coherence Electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) Nonlinear Magneto Optic Polarization Rotation Large rotation, near Earth’s field NMOR for Elliptically Polarized Light Higher order atomic coherence L+M Scheme Experimental results Atomic Coherence Effects Three (or more) Atomic Energy Levels Natural decay g The combined action of the drive and probe lasers produces a quantum superposition of the two lower states: a b c c b Coupling Laser ‘‘Drive Laser’’ Coherence Decay gbc Probe Laser: frequency w Then, the probe field interacts with this superposition state. Three Level System For: Low density (single atom response) Monochromatic probe Weak probe W > Wp a W g Wp c gbc b Calculate susceptibility of homogeneously broadened 3-level system. See for example, Scully and Zubairy, Quantum Optics, Cambridge University Press, 1997. where Three Atomic Energy Levels index of refraction Electromagnetically Induced Transparency a c NonAnomolous dispersion dn > 0 vg c dw n=1 Ultra slow light Transmission through 10,000 absorption lengths, Harris et al., 1998. Vg = 1 m/s (c/300,000,000) Ketterly et al., 2001. absorption b Transparency (w-w0)/g Refractive Refractive index index Ideal System for Studying EIT: Nonlinear Magneto-Optic Rotation M=0 E- -BB M=-1 M=0 Transmission Linearly polarized light M=1 Laserfrequency frequency Laser B atomic medium Magnetic field Rotation angle E+ Magnetic field S1, arb.units Transmission, arb.units Measurements -15 -5 5 -15 15 Magnetic field, mG Rotation angle f , rad 5 Magnetic field, mG 15 Transmission S1+S2 S2, arb.units -5 5 Magnetic field, mG Recorded signals -15 -5 15 0.5 0.25 0 -15 -5 -0.25 5 15 -0.5 Magnetic field, mG S1 S2 1 Rotation angle f arcsin 2 S1 S2 High Optical Density: Photodetector signals Large rotation angle -600 -400 -200 0 200 400 600 Magnetic field, mG Scaling to high density and laser power gives multiple oscillations as polarization rotation passes 2p Corresponding Verde constant: V~7·103 min·oersted-1·cm-1 Magnetic TGG crystal: V ~0.4 min·oersted-1·cm-1 Self-rotation Ries et al., http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/0303109 Magneto-optic rotation of elliptical polarization F'=1 L-Scheme L+M Scheme 87Rb F'=2 2 2 BB IIout ddff 2 1 2 q ln out ln 2 2 dB g I dB BB g 00 Iinin 00 2 2 q 2 2 E E0 (q 1) / 2 A.B. Matsko, I. Novikova, M. S. Zubairy, G.R. Welch, PRA 67, 043805 (2003). df dB L M Relative rotation rate 4 / df 1 2 q2 dB L 2 2 q 2 2 3 L+M 2 1 L 0 0 0.5 1 Ellipticity parameter q A.B. Matsko, I. Novikova, M. S. Zubairy, G.R. Welch, Optics Letters, January 15 (2003). Ellipticity-dependent NMOR: experiment 2 Relative rotation rate 1.5 1.5 1.5 111 1.8 T=32 T=55 T=70.5 T=85 T-90 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0 0.5 1 Ellipticity parameter q 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.8 Output ellipticity e out Relative Relative rotation rotation rate rate 222 0.6 000 000 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 11 Ellipticity parameterqqq 0.2 Ellipticity parameter Ellipticity parameter 0 0 0.2 0.4 T=30 T=70.5 T=85 T=90 0.6 Input ellipticity e in 0.8 Trans. 1-1 Trans. 1-1 P=2mW Trans. 1-1 P=2mW P=1mW Trans. 2-1 P=1mW wide beam Isolation of M-scheme enhancement Higher-order chains F'=2 85Rb F=3 4-photon coherence 6-photon coherence 3L + M Scheme NMOR for atoms with higher angular momentum 2 Relative rotation rate Relative rotation rate 10 8 6 3L+M 4 2 M 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 0 0 0.5 df dB L 4 q2 4 q 2 2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Ellipticity parameter q df dB 3L M 0.2 F=2->F'=1 transition 87Rb Ellipticity parameter q F=3->F'=2 transition 85Rb 1 8 6q2 3q4 2 4 3q2 2 1 Conclusion: Study of NMOR of elliptically polarized light L, M, and higher-chain schemes Enhancement of rotation due to multiphoton coherence