Protein dynamics - Biomolecular Engineering Laboratory

advertisement
Protein dynamics at a single molecule level
Protein dynamics
• Proteins are in motion, sampling the ensemble of different conformations
• Energy landscape: Conformational space that a protein can explore
- Relative population of different conformational states
- Rates of inter-conversion
Key biological processes occur on μs to ms scale
- Recognition of cognate ligands
- Signal transduction
- Allosteric regulation of proteins
- Enzyme catalysis
Relatively long lifetimes
- Individual states and kinetics of inter-conversion can be
detected experimentally.
Henzler-Wildman and Kern, Nature (2007)
How do protein dynamics affect their functions?
Signal transduction
Molecular recognition
Ubiquitin
Forty-six crystal structures of ubiquitin: conformational dynamics
control ubiquitin-protein interactions and influence in vivo signaling.
Signals such as ligand binding, mutation, PTMs alter energy
landscape, affecting relative population of conformations
Enzyme catalysis and allosteric regulation
- Active (green) and inactive (blue, red, yellow, and gray) conformations.
- Allosteric ligand binding (cyan star) stabilizes the inactive conformation
(red), inhibiting the enzyme activity.
Lee and Craik, Science (2009)
Molecular recognition
•
•
The function of proteins depends on the recognition and binding of specific ligands
οƒ  Central to all biological processes
Precise molecular recognition mechanism: Crucial for understanding biology at
molecular level
• Two textbook mechanisms: The protein exists in a single, stable conformation.
- Lock-and-key model by Fischer (1894)
- Induced-fit mechanism by Koshland (1958)
Conformational dynamics and ligand binding
•
•
Existence of conformational substates: Linkage between protein dynamics and molecular recognition
Conformational selection model : Dynamics-coupled recognition mechanism
• Induced-fit model
Ligand binds a highly populated substate,
inducing conformational change to a ligand-bound form.
• Conformational selection model
Ligand selectively binds a weakly populated substate,
but no further structural change occurs.
The role of conformational dynamics in molecular recognition remains
controversial mainly owing to experimental limitations
Single molecule FRET measurements
Förster (or Fluorescence) Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)
•
•
•
Non-radiative energy transfer from an energy donor to an acceptor
Dipole – dipole interactions
Energy transfer efficiency between two probes:
- Degree of spectral overlap between donor emission and acceptor absorption
- ~ 1 / (separation distance)6
- Effective distance : ~ 10 nm
E = Ro6/ (Ro6 + R6)
Ro : Förster distance at which the energy transfer
is about 50%
•
•
•
•
Analysis of biomolecular interactions
Screening of inhibitors
Detection of a target analyte
Imaging (localization)
Single-molecule FRET (smFRET) measurements
Analysis of FRET at the level of single molecule which is labeled with a pair of dyes
1)
Kinetic analysis of biomolecular interactions and conformational changes at a single molecule level
Understanding the molecular mechanism
Single-molecule FRET measurements
Real-time kinetic analysis of the conformational dynamics of a protein at a
single-molecule level
Heterogeneous population
Ensemble FRET
Single-molecule FRET
(Histogram of FRET)
Counts
(Bulk measurement)
Counts
Active, real molecules
FRET efficiency
FRET efficiency
FRET
efficiency
FRET
efficiency
Dynamic behavior
Time (s)
Time (s)
Kinetic rates in the absence and presence of increasing ligand concentration
will provide crucial insight into the molecular recognition process
Single molecule FRET analysis
Answers to many of fundamental biological questions
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Real dynamic characteristics of proteins /enzymes
Protein folding
Conformational change of protein
Replication
Recombination
Transcription
Translation
RNA folding and catalysis
Motor proteins
Signal transduction
Expected kinetic rates for a molecular recognition process
Induced-fit model
The closing rate will be faster in the presence of a ligand than in its absence and will be accelerated
by increasing ligand concentration.
Conformational selection model
The closing rates in the presence of a ligand will be the same as those with no ligand because the
population of a ligand-binding conformer is limited by the intrinsic conformational transition rate.
Kinetic rates by dwell time analysis
Real-time changes in FRET efficiency
The opening and closing rates
Open lifetime
Closed lifetime
Acceptor bleaching
Donor intensity
Acceptor intensity
Donor bleaching
Intensity
FRET
efficiency
Dwell time analysis
Closed state
Open state
FRET
efficiency
Time (s)
Estimation of average
dwell time, τ
EFRET =
IA
IA + ID
Single exponential
decay curve
Counts
Time (s)
Histogram of dwell times
of each state
Time (s)
ID: Donor intensity
IA: Acceptor intensity
The cπ₯𝐨𝐬𝐒𝐧𝐠 𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞 =
𝟏
𝐎𝐩𝐞𝐧 𝐝𝐰𝐞π₯π₯ 𝐭𝐒𝐦𝐞 (𝛕)
The o𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐒𝐧𝐠 𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞 =
𝟏
𝐂π₯𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐝𝐰𝐞π₯π₯ 𝐭𝐒𝐦𝐞 (𝛕)
Maltose binding protein (MBP)
•
•
•
•
ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter in E. coli : active transport and chemotaxis
Large conformational change upon ligand binding: Rotation > 30° at hinge region
The highest binding affinity for maltotriose (Kd = ~ 1.6 X 10-7M)
Mr = 40 kDa
Maltose uptake in E. coli
LamB
M
al
LamB
Outer
membrane
M
al
M
al
Inner
membrane
LamB
Scheme for single-molecule FRET measurements
Labeling of MBP
5.92 nm
5.04 nm
Cy5
Cy3
Cy3
K34C
Cy5
R354C
+ Maltose
K34C
R354C
Prism-type Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence (TIRF) Microscope
Intrinsic dynamics of wt-MBP
0 µM
0.5 µM
2 µM
10 µM
• The intrinsic transition was too fast to detect owing to a low time resolution (~ 2 ms)
• Maltose induced a structural change of wt-MBP
MBP variants with hinge region mutations
Changes in domain closure angles and binding affinity of the MBP by hinge region mutations
N-domain
35°
C-domain
WT(0°)
I329C(5.5°)
I329W(9.5°)
I329W/A96W(28.4°)
WT(35°)
Introduction of bulky amino acids into the hinge region
οƒ  Slow down the intrinsic conformational dynamics
οƒ  Allow the analysis of conformational dynamics using smFRET
Millet et al., PNAS (2003)
Labeling and evaluation of MBP wild-type
Circular Dichroism (CD) analysis
Amylose-binding assay
30000
Wild-type MBP
Double Cys-MBP
Labeled MBP
ellipticity, mdeg
20000
MBP
Double Cys-MBP
(wild-type)
(K34C, R354C)
M L F W
10000
E
L
F W1 W2 E
100
75
0
50
-10000
35
-20000
25
-30000
200
210
220 230 240
Wavelength, nm
250
260
Cysteine mutations and dye labeling do not affect the folding and
the maltose-binding activity of MBP
Kim et al. Nature Chemical Biology (2013)
Single and double mutants of MBP
Real-time traces of MBP mutants
Mutant construction
Single mutant
Double mutant
High FRET: Partially closed state
Low FRET : Open form
• Detection of intrinsic dynamics of the mutants in the absence of a ligand
• Transitions between two distinct conformations (open and partially closed forms)
Kim et al. Nature Chemical Biology (2013)
Maltose-induced effect on the single mutant of MBP
Representative time traces
• Maltose induced the clear conformational changes of MBP
• The intrinsic transition rate could be measured in the absence of ligand
Kim et al. Nature Chemical Biology (2013)
Investigation of Single Mutant
Construction of single mutant
Histogram of FRET efficiency
Maltose binding induces the population shift of the single mutant of MBP
Kim et al. Nature Chemical Biology (2013)
Ligand-binding kinetics of the single mutant
Dwell time analysis of maltose binding
Lifetime of open state
Lifetime of the open state
Lifetime of closed state
The ligand-binding to MBP variant was governed by ligand-induced fit
The first experimental evidence showing molecular recognition mechanism based on
conformational dynamics analysis
Investigation of double mutant similar to the partial closed form
Construction of double mutant
Histogram of
FRET efficiency
maltose
maltose
maltose
* Partial closed form = 33.3° ± 6.7°
Tang et al. (2007) Nature 449, 1078
maltose
The ligand could bind to the partial closed form
οƒ  All conformers participate in the ligand binding.
Kim et al. Nature Chemical Biology (2013)
Representative
time traces
Intrinsic conformational dynamics of the mutants
Relative population of the
partially closed state
Intrinsic
opening rate (s-1)
Intrinsic
closing rate (s-1)
Intrinsic transition rates
• The partially closed states of the single and double mutants: 14% and 42% of
the total population, respectively.
• Double mutant showed much slower closing and opening rates than the single
mutant
Kim et al. Nature Chemical Biology (2013)
Effect of ligand concentration on the kinetic rates of the mutants
Representative time traces of the intensity
and FRET efficiency for the single mutant
Kinetic rates in the absence and presence of a ligand
Closing rate
Opening rate
Single mutant
Double mutant
Wild- type
•
•
The closing rate increased linearly with an increase in the ligand (maltose , maltotriose) concentration.
The opening rate remained almost constant over the range of tested ligand concentrations.
• Ligands bind preferentially to the open state, inducing a structural change to a closed form
• Direct evidence for the induced-fit mechanism.
Kim et al. Nature Chemical Biology (2013)
Three-color smFRET using Cy7-maltose
Direct quantification of the binding preference of a ligand to an open conformation
633 nm excitation
532 nm excitation
Monitoring of the opening and closing dynamics
through Cy3-Cy5 FRET or Cy5 intensity
Tracking the binding of maltose through Cy7 intensity
Binding to a
Binding to an
partially closed form open form
E12
On state (closed form)
E23
Off state (open form)
Cy7-Maltose binding
E13
Lee et al. PLoS ONE (2010)
Maltose Binding
On time
Off time
Cy7-Maltose binding
(Cy5 οƒ  Cy7)
(Cy3 οƒ  Cy7)
Time (s)
Synthesis of Cy7-maltose
Synthesis of PEG-amine-linked maltose followed by conjugation with Cy7-mono NHS ester
Mass spectrometry analyses
PEG-amine
maltose
Cy7-maltose
Kim et al. Nature Chemical Biology (2013)
Cy7-maltose
Three-color smFERT for the double mutant
Simultaneous analysis of Cy7-maltose binding and conformational dynamics
Open state
Partially closed state
Cy7-Maltose binding events :
Jumps of Cy7 signal and concurrent drops of Cy5 signal
Relative distribution of the FRET efficiencies
(Cy3-Cy5) before the binding and after the
dissociation of Cy7-maltose
• Ligand binds both the open and partially closed conformations of the mutant
• More than 80% of binding and dissociation events occurred in the open form,
indicating a strong preference for the open conformation
Kim et al. Nature Chemical Biology (2013)
Energetic and parameters : Energies of a ligand binding and conformational change
The existence of a partially closed form: critical role in the molecular recognition process
Protein
Ligand
Binding energy, Δε
(kcal/mol)
maltose
-7.45 ± 0.10
Wild-type MBP
Single mutant
(MBP-I329W)
Double mutant
(MBP-A96W/I329W)
•
•
Energy of
conformational change, εc
(kcal/mol)
1.54
maltotriose
-8.56 ± 0.12
maltose
-9.25 ± 0.12
0.74
maltotriose
-9.72 ± 0.25
maltose
-10.43 ± 0.08
0.19
maltotriose
-10.20 ± 0.12
Intrinsic dynamics facilitate a large conformational change that occurs upon sugar binding,
with less energy expenditure
Conformational dynamics have a role in facilitating the transition to a holo structure or in
influencing the chemical step during enzyme catalysis
Extended induced-fit model
Ligands bind both a highly populated and weakly populated substates,
inducing a structural transition to a ligand-bound, closed form.
Interplay of conformational dynamics and binding affinity
MBP mutants with varying binding affinity
• The dissociation constants (Kd) were determined through ITC
• Two orders of magnitude variation in Kd
MBP mutants
Seo et al. Nature Communications (2014)
Mutation
Kd (nM)
Wild-type (WT)
A96
I329
1102±65
AY
A96
I329Y
22±6
AF
A96
I329F
35±8
WI
A96W
I329
81±18
YI
A96Y
I329
218±23
FI
A96F
I329
492±50
WA
A96W
I329A
515±67
YA
A96Y
I329A
741±22
AR
A96
I329R
905±50
AK
A96
I329K
987±25
FA
A96F
I329A
989±37
Analysis of conformational dynamics of MBP variants by smFRET
Partially
closed
Open
kclosing
kopening
π‘Άπ’‘π’†π’π’Šπ’π’ˆ 𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒆 =
Cπ’π’π’”π’Šπ’π’ˆ 𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒆
Calculation of transition rate by dwell time analysis
=
𝟏
𝒄𝒍𝒐𝒔𝒆𝒅 π’…π’˜π’†π’π’ π’•π’Šπ’Žπ’† (𝝉)
𝟏
𝒐𝒑𝒆𝒏 π’…π’˜π’†π’π’ π’•π’Šπ’Žπ’† (𝝉)
Intrinsic dynamics of MBP mutants
MBP mutants show different closed dwell times along with their Kd
Cy5
Cy3
Seo et al. Nature Communications (2014)
Intrinsic dynamics and binding affinity of MBP mutants
Partially
closed
Open
kclosing
kopening
Intrinsic opening rate directly dictates ligand-binding affinity
Seo et al. Nature Communications (2014)
Conformational energy and binding affinity of MBP mutants
•
The energy barrier between an open state and a partially closed state (EOP.C., EP.C.O)
determines the rate of inter-conversion (closing rate / opening rate)
•
Mutant with an increased energy level in an open substate :
- Lower structural energy cost (Ec) for transition to a partially closed state,
- Higher energy barrier (E‡P.C.οƒ O) for transition to an open state from a partially closed state,
leading to a slower opening rate οƒ  Higher binding affinity for a ligand
Seo et al. Nature Communications (2014)
Effect of a ligand on the transition rate
Time traces and FRET histogram of a MBP mutant
Open
Variable
Closed
kclosing
kopening
Characteristic,
constant
Ligand dissociation is solely determined by the intrinsic opening rate
Seo et al. Nature Communications (2014)
Conclusions
•
A new platform based on FRET between QDs and AuNPs was well established
•
The FRET-based system were found to be simple and effective for high throughput
assays of protein glycosylation and protease activity
•
Molecular beacon can be used for rapid detection of acquired drug resistance and
potential biomarker in lung cancer, offering a way of personalized medicine
•
smFRET measurement enabled a kinetic analysis of conformational dynamics,
providing direct evidence for the mechanism for ligand recognition and dissociation.
•
Intrinsic dynamics (opening rate) directly dictate the binding affinity for a ligand
•
The present approach will offer a new method to elucidate the molecular
recognition and dissociation mechanisms of proteins with intrinsic dynamics,
assisting in the design of more potent drugs and even proteins with new function.
Acknowledgements
KAIST
Department of Biological Sciences
Dr. Young-pil Kim
Dr. Eunkeu Oh
Dr. Young-Hee Oh
Sung-Min Cho
Dr. Eunkyung Kim
Dr. Moon-Hyeong Seo
Dr. Jung Min Choi
Department of Chemistry
Aram Jeon
Prof. Hee-Seung Lee
SungKyunkwan Univ. School of Medicine
Dr. Young-Uk Kim
Prof. KeunChil Park
Seoul National Univ.
Prof. Sungchul Hohng
Dr. Sanghwa Lee
Jeongbin Park
Pennsylvania State Univ., USA
Prof. D. D. Boehr
The Uppsala Univ., Sweden
Prof. S. Mowbray
Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning
- Pioneer Research Program for Converging Technology
- BK 21 program
- Creative Research Initiatives (S.H.)
Collaborative works
Flow of ideas
Pennsylvania State
University.
U.S.A
WeizmannInstitute
of Science,
Israel.
고톡 λΆ„λ‹΄ :
1
( N=1, 2, 3, …)
KIST
2
N
KRIBB
Pacific
National Laboratory
U.S.A
기쁨 :
N2
μ„œμšΈλŒ€ μšΈλ¦¬ν•™κ³Ό
κ³ λ €λŒ€ 화곡과
KAIST
λ°”μ΄μ˜€μ‹œμŠ€ν…œ
( N=1, 2, 3, …)
μ•„μ‚° 병원
삼성병원
Biomolecular Engineering Lab.
Biological role of intrinsic dynamics
Protein
Energy of
conformational
change (εc)
(kcal/mol)
Binding energy
(Δε) (kcal/mol)
Dissociation
constants
(Kd) (nM)a
Dissociation
Constants by ITC
(Kd) (nM)b
Wild-type
1.77
n.d.(maltose)
- 8.91 (maltotriose)
n.d.(maltose)
715 (maltotriose)
2180 (maltose)
1950 (maltotriose)
Single mutant
(I329W)
1.09
- 9.48 (maltose)
- 9.82 (maltotriose)
99 (maltose)
56 (maltotriose)
48 (maltose)
53 (maltotriose)
Double mutant
(A96W/I329W)
0.19
- 10.39 (maltose)
- 10.19 (maltotriose)
7.2 (maltose)
10 (maltotriose)
4.7 (maltose)
2.3 (maltotriose)
a: The dissociation constants were determined from a hyperbolic Hill fit of the relative population of a closed state
b: The dissociation constants were determined through ITC
•
Correlation between the structural energy costs and the dissociation constants
observed in the three MBP mutants
•
The intrinsic dynamics of MBP facilitate a large conformational change that occurs
upon sugar binding, which can be achieved with less energy expenditure
Kim et al., Nature Chem. Biol. (2013)
FRET efficiency calculation
𝐼𝑖𝐺
is the gamma-corrected fluorescence intensity of the ith dye
after whole correction steps when excited by the green laser
𝐼𝑖𝑅
is the gamma-corrected fluorescence intensity of the ith dye
after whole correction steps when excited by the red laser
Lee S, Lee J, and Hohng S (2010) PLoS ONE 5(8): e12270
Estimation of FRET efficiencies on binding of Cy7-maltose to dual labeled wt-MBP
Binding to an open form
Binding to a closed form
Cy7
Cy7
Cy5
23.0 Å
Cy5
45.0 Å
60.1 Å
C34_Cy3
C354_Cy5
C34_Cy5
C354_Cy3
22.8 Å
48.1 Å
Cy3
Cy3
51.6 Å
Distance (nm)
FRET Efficiency
C34_Cy3-Cy7
4.81
0.20
C354_Cy5-Cy7
2.28
1.00
C34_Cy3-Cy7
4.50
0.27
C354_Cy5-Cy7
2.30
1.00
C354_Cy3-Cy7
2.28
0.96
C34_Cy5-Cy7
4.81
0.82
C354_Cy3-Cy7
2.30
0.95
C34_Cy5-Cy7
4.50
0.87
closed form
Cy3-Cy5
5.16
0.57
bound, open form
Cy3-Cy5
6.01
0.34
closed form
bound, open form
closed form
bound, open form
Dynamics-coupled molecular recognition mechanism
• Connection between the conformational dynamics and molecular
recognition of proteins in the process of ligand binding
• Role of conformational dynamics in molecular recognition remains
controversial and elusive mainly owing to experimental limitations
• Real-time kinetic analysis of the ligand binding and conformational
dynamics
• Single-molecule FRET analysis : Detection of inter-conversion rate
upon ligand binding at the single-molecule level
Regulation of ligand residence time
Our previous study reveals that the opening rate
of MBP is independent of ligand existence.
Single mutant
other reports,
ligand binding affinity of the MBP variants is
determined primarily by differences in the off-rate
Double mutant
π‘˜π‘œπ‘π‘  = π‘˜1 𝐿 + π‘˜−1
kobs = observed rate
k1 = on-rate
k-1 = off-rate
Kim E. et al. (2013) Nature Chem. Biol. 9, 313
Marvin. et al. (2013) Nature Struc. Biol. 8(9), 795
We can modulate the protein dynamics by allosteric approach
for optimizing ligand residence times to meet the desired pharmaceutical
modulation of disease states
(ligand residence times control the strength of regulatory process)
Conclusion
1. Interactions between a protein and a ligand are essential to all biological
processes.
2. MBP mutants constructed through hinge mutations were shown to have a
wide range of intrinsic opening rates and dissociation constants for maltose.
3. Intrinsic opening rate of the protein dictates the ligand dissociation, and
consequently determines the binding affinity for a ligand.
4. The residence time of a ligand has a significant effect on the signal
transduction, regulatory processes, and drug responses.
(1) The ligand residence time can be regulated by modulating the intrinsic dynamic
characteristics.
(2) The changes in the dynamic personalities of a protein by allosteric approach can
modulate the ligand-binding affinity and vice versa.
Interplay of conformational dynamics and ligand dissociation
Intrinsic
opening rate (s-1)
Single mutant
Kd = 48 nM
π‘˜π‘œπ‘π‘  = π‘˜1 𝐿 + π‘˜−1
Double mutant
Kd = 4.7 nM
Kd : 7 ~ 1800 nM
k1 (on-rate) : 10.8 ~ 18.2 (s-1)
k-1 (off-rate) : 0 ~ 100 (s-1)
A close correlation between the opening rate
of MBPs and their binding affinity for a ligand
The binding affinity of the MBP variants for a ligand
is determined primarily by differences in the off-rate
Kim et al., Nature Chem. Biol. (2013)
Marvin et al., Nature Struc. Mol. Biol. (2001)
Allosteric mutations of MBP
οƒ˜ Hinge mutations of MBP are known to significantly alter the
binding affinity while maintaining the ligand-binding interfaces
N-domain
35°
C-domain
WT(0°)
I329C(5.5°)
I329W(9.5°)
I329W/A96W
(28.4°)
WT(35°)
Millet et al., PNAS (2003)
Recognition mechanism of MBP
Induced-fit model
Conformational selection model
Structural difference between ligand-free
and ligand-bound forms
Existence of the minor partially closed species (~5%) in the
absence of a ligand by NMR relaxation experiment
Ligand-bound
Ligand-free
Tang et al., Nature (2007)
Sharff et al., Biochem. (1992)
Induced-fit or conformational selection model ?
Download