nota bene: I reserve the right to amend or append this syllabus as may be necessary and proper. Education Research Literature and Techniques ED520.01E CRN 20102 Texas A&M University-Texarkana Spring, 2011 Mondays, 1600-1800 (face to face), remainder Web Enhanced Contact Information Instructor: Email: Office phone: Office hours: Course Number: Course Title: Walter Thomas Casey II, Ph.D. wcasey@tamut.edu 903.334.6664 Monday- 12:00-16:00 Tuesday- 13:30-17:30 Thursday- 13:30-15:30 …and by Appointment ED520.01E Credits: 3 SCH Education Research Literature and Techniques Course Description: The course will address: (1) the processes and tools necessary to locate, read, understand, and critique education research, and (2) the fundamental techniques of planning, conducting, and reporting qualitative and quantitative research in the field of education. Course Rationale: Successful educators must be data-driven in decision-making. The current levels of fiscal and academic accountability at the local, state, and national levels demand a clinical approach to school improvement—one that includes the careful selection, implementation, and clinical evaluation of new innovations and the selective abandonment of those that do not produce the desired outcomes. This clinical process requires the continuous evaluation of relevant, education research. Student Learner Outcomes: By completing class activities and course assignments students will: 1. Apply the fundamental principles of education research to education decision-making. 2. Use electronic data bases to locate education research literature and be knowledgeable of traditional approaches to research. 3. Analyze, critique, and summarize education research literature. 4. Describe quantitative and qualitative research designs. 5. Write an education research proposal. 6. Identify and critique the components of a comprehensive education research report. 7. Apply the steps of the action research process. 8. Design education program evaluation. 9. Utilize technology appropriate to the study of research and evaluation. 10. Apply the principles of Scientifically Based Research (SBR) to education decision-making. 11. Understand the impact of the No Child Left Behind law on education research. Prerequisites: None, but a well-developed understanding of proper writing techniques is essential 1 Justification: Administrators, curriculum leaders, and teacher leaders of the 21 st century must have a deep understanding of education research and its importance in school improvement efforts. Culturally and economically diverse student populations require educators use their knowledge of education literature and scientifically-based research to evaluate the effectiveness and applicability of solutions to challenges in teaching and learning. No Child Left Behind (NCLB) requires the use of scientifically-based research that: Employs systematic, empirical methods that draw on observation or experiment; Involves rigorous data analyses that are adequate to test the stated hypotheses and justify the general conditions drawn; Relies on measurements or observational methods that provide reliable and valid data across evaluators and observers and across multiple measurements and observations; and Has been accepted by a peer-reviewed journal or approved by a panel of independent experts through a comparably rigorous, objective, and scientific review (Title I, Part B, Subpart 1, Section 1208). Therefore, educators must be familiar with the terms and processes involved in scientifically-based research. Standards for the Master Teacher Areas Master Reading Teacher Standards Standard II: The Master Reading Teacher selects and administers appropriate reading assessments on an ongoing basis and uses the results to design, inform, and adjust instruction to promote literacy. Standard VI: The Master Reading Teacher facilitates appropriate, research-based reading instruction by communicating and collaborating with educational stakeholders; mentoring, coaching, and consulting with colleagues; providing professional development for faculty; and making decisions based on converging evidence from research. Master Mathematics Teacher Standards Standard VIII: The Master Mathematics Teacher selects, constructs, and administers appropriate assessments to guide, monitor, evaluate, and report student progress to students, administrators, and parents, and develops these skills in other teachers. Standard IX: The Master Mathematics Teacher facilitates appropriate standards-based mathematics instruction by communicating and collaborating with educational stake-holders; mentoring, coaching, exhibiting leadership, and consulting with colleagues; providing professional development opportunities for faculty; and making instructional decisions based on data and supported by evidence from research. Master Technology Teacher Standards Standard II: The Master Technology Teacher selects and administers appropriate technology-related assessments on an ongoing basis and used the results to design and improve instruction. Standard V: The Master Technology Teacher facilitates appropriate, research-based technology instruction by communicating and collaborating with educational stakeholders; mentoring, coaching, and consulting with colleagues; providing professional development opportunities for faculty; and making decisions based on converging evidence form research. 2 Technology Integration Technology Enhanced Instruction Instructor will: support instruction using the classroom presentation system. summarize material using electronic presentations. utilize Web sites for current and supplemental information. conduct learning activities through Blackboard Technology Enhanced Learning Students will: use electronic resources to locate education research literature. employ Web resources to format and submit research proposals. The APA Manual, 6th edition, will be used to ensure proper APA style formatting for the organization of writing and references. construct assignments in a variety of environments including word processing, spreadsheet and slide show. use Turnitin® to review all written work for plagiarism. complete course activities through Blackboard. Resources Required Text Fraenkel, J.R., & Wallen, N.E. (2009). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education, 7th edition. Boston: McGraw-Hill ISBN: 0073525960 Price: $133.44 Supplemental Resource: (Purchase is not required, but HIGHLY recommended) American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. (ISBN 1-55798-791-2) The APA manual is available at local bookstores, on line at http://www.apastyle.org/, or other online booksellers. OR --- (2005). Concise rules of APA style. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association. (ISBN 1-59147-252-0) Resources needed: Ability to use the Turnitin®, word processing, and electronic slide presentations. Computer access to the following online learning center is required to complete the research design activities: http://highered.mcgraw-hill.com/sites/0073525960/information_center_view0/ 3 References: Andersen, R. (1994). Powerful writing skills. Hawthorne, N.J.: Career Press. Bernhardt, V. L. (2000). Designing and using databases for school improvement. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research ( 2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Glazer, S.M., & Brown, C.W. (1993). Portfolios and beyond: Collaborative assessment in reading and writing. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers. Glesne, C. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman. Gubrium, J.F. & Holstein, J. A.(Eds.). (2001). Handbook of interview research: Context and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Harris, R. A. (2003). Writing with clarity and style: A guide to rhetorical devices for contemporary writers. Los Angeles, CA: Pyrczak Publishing. Henson, K.T. (1999). Writing for professional publication: Keys to academic and business success. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2001, 5 th ed.) Research in education: A conceptual introduction. Miles, M.B. and Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2 nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Milinki, A. K. (1999). Cases in qualitative research. Los Angeles, CA: Pyrzcak Publishing. Pan, M. L. (2004). Preparing literature reviews: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Glendale, CA: Pyrczak Publishing. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Provost, G. (1985). 100 ways to improve your writing. New York, NY: Penguin Group. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. (2001, 5 th ed.) Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association. Rowntree, Derek. (1981) Statistics without tears: A primer for non-mathematicians. Vogt, W. Paul. (1993) Dictionary of statistics and methodology. (ISBN: 0-8039-5276-7). Williams, Frederick. (1986) Reasoning with statistics: How to read quantitative research. Internet Resources AskERIC American Psychological Association Education Research Service U.S. Department of Education What Works Clearinghouse Stanford Encylopaedia of Philosophy Science/pseudo-science http://www.eric.ed.gov http://www.apastyle.org http://www.ers.org http://www.ed.gov/nclb/methods/whatworks/research/index.html http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/overview/ http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pseudo-science/ http://www.chem1.com/acad/sci/pseudosci.html WITHDRAWING FROM THIS COURSE1) If you decide that you must drop the course, it is your responsibility to fill out the appropriate form in the college office on campus. Withdrawal from the course after the official day of record will result in a final grade of “W” on the student transcript and no credit will be awarded. Prior to the official day of record, it is the student’s responsibility to initiate and complete a request for withdrawal from any course. I do not automatically drop students. You do your own paperwork. 2) If you stop attending class and do not fill out the drop form, you will receive an "F" in the course. Disability Accommodations: Students with disabilities may request reasonable accommodations through the A&M-Texarkana Disability Services Office by calling 903-223-3062 4 Course Outline: Date Topic Assignment Session 1 F2F 24 Jan Introduction The Research Process Action Research Chapter 1, 24; Handout: What is Research? What is Theory? What is Science (and pseudo-science)? Session 2 web 31 Jan Identifying a Research Problem Overview of Research Designs Quantitative/Qualitative Methods APA Tutorial Chapter 2 and Web activities Session 3 F2F 7 Feb Research Questions/Hypotheses Variables Succinct Writing Chapter 3 Research Proposal Topic due Session 4 F2F 14 Feb Experimental Designs Chapter 13 and Web activities Action Research Project topic due Literature Reviews Professional Writing Tips Chapter 5 Single Subject Designs Causal Comparative Designs Chapters 14, 16 and Web activities Methodology Sampling Techniques Data Collection Chapters 6, 7 Correlational Studies Chapters 15, 17 and Web activities Session 9 Midterm Session 10 F2F 28 Mar Historical Studies Session 11 F2F 4 Apr Session 12 F2F 11 Apr Session 5 F2F 21 Feb Session 6 F2F 28 Feb Session 7 F2F 7 Mar Session 8 F2F 21 Mar Survey Research Take-home, online, and F2F sections* Chapter 22 and Web activities Data Analysis Recommendations/Conclusions Chapters 10-12 Ethnography Chapter 21 and Web activities Session 13 F2F 18 Apr Validity/Reliability Chapter 9 Session 14 F2F 25 Apr Content Analysis Chapter 20 and Web activities Research Proposals Due Session 15 F2F 2 May Action Research Presentations Session 16 F2F 9 May Final Exam 5 Course Requirements/Assignments/Field Based Activities Examinations: A mid-term and final examination will be administered. The exams will be comprehensive evaluations of all material covered in the course. The exams will include objective, subjective, and constructive formats. Web Activities: Web activities investigating research designs will be completed and submitted using directions provided by the instructor. Research Design/Proposal: A research design/proposal will be presented on a relevant education topic using a designated outline and APA writing style. Plagiarism will result in a grade of zero (0) for this assignment. Proposals will be submitted using the Turnitin® system for plagiarism prevention. Information regarding this system along with other information on plagiarism is available at the following URL: http://turnitin.com/research_site/e_home.html. Action Research Project: A research project will be conducted and reported in a poster presentation describing the project and outcomes. Evaluation Procedures Web Activities (7 @ 5 points) 35 pts. Midterm Exam 12 pts. Research Proposal 16 pts. Action Research Project Action Research Project Presentation 10 pts. 5 pts. Final Exam 12 pts. Total Grading Scale: A- 89+ B- 78-88 100 pts. C- 69-77 D- 60-68 F- 59 and below Note: I DO NOT CURVE GRADES- it only rewards the weak and punishes the smart. Academic Integrity: Academic honesty is expected of students enrolled in this course. Cheating on examinations, unauthorized collaboration, falsification of research data, plagiarism, and undocumented use of materials from any source constitute academic dishonesty and will be grounds for a grade of ‘F’ in the course and/or disciplinary actions. For additional information, see the university catalog. TAMUT is committed to a high standard of academic integrity in the academic community. In becoming a part of the academic community, TAMUT students are responsible for honesty and independent effort. The faculty expects from its students a high level of responsibility and academic honesty. Because the value of an academic degree depends upon the absolute integrity of the work done by the student for that degree, it is imperative that a student demonstrate a high standard of individual honor in his or her scholastic work. Failure to uphold these standards includes, but is not limited to, the following: cheating, plagiarism, collusion and/or falsifying academic records. Students suspected of academic dishonesty are subject to disciplinary proceedings. Plagiarism, especially from the web, from portions of papers for other classes, and from any other source is unacceptable and will be dealt with under the university’s policy on plagiarism (see general catalog for details). This course will use the resources of turnitin.com (and other resources) for searches on the web for possible plagiarism. A. Some Definitions: 1) Cheating includes looking at or copying from another student's exam, orally communicating or receiving answers during an exam, having another person take an exam or complete a project or assignment, using unauthorized notes, texts, or other materials for an exam, and obtaining or distributing an unauthorized copy of an exam or any part of an exam. 6 2) Plagiarism means passing off as his/her own the ideas or writings of another (that is, without giving proper credit by documenting sources). Plagiarism includes submitting a paper, report or project that someone else has prepared, in whole or in part. 3) Collusion is inappropriately collaborating on assignments designed to be completed independently. These definitions are not exhaustive. B. With instructor permission only, audio recording devices may be used during lectures only for the purpose of helping students take notes. The use of such devices for any other purpose may result in loss of device use for remainder of semester, system charges of academic dishonesty, and administrative drop from the course. No other electronic devices will be allowed during class without specific written instructor approval. All lectures are copyrighted material and may not be disseminated without the express written consent of the instructor. When there is any scholastic dishonesty, I will assign an “F” for the course, and additional sanctions may include being expelled from TAMUT and the TAMU System, and punishments appropriate under State of Texas Criminal Code, Penal Section §32.49, (HB 0762). Student Technical Assistance: Blackboard Helpdesk contacts: Office hours are: Monday - Friday, 8:00a to 5:00p Kevin Williams (main contact) 903-223-1356 kevin.williams@tamut.edu Frank Miller (alternate) 903-223-3156 frank.miller@tamut.edu Nikki Thomson (alternate) 903-223-3083 nikki.thomson@tamut.edu **Students seeking a professional certificate must meet with the certification officer for official admittance into a certification program. The certification officer for Texas A&M University-Texarkana is Bonnie Johnson. She is located in University Center 245 and can be contacted by phone at 903-223-3048. NOTE: Upon application to Texas A&M University-Texarkana an individual will be assigned an A&MTexarkana email account. This email account will be used to deliver official university correspondence. Each individual is responsible for information sent and received via the university email account and is expected to check the official A&M-Texarkana email account on a frequent and consistent basis. Faculty and students are required to utilize the university email account when communicating about coursework. -------�------�------�------�-------�------�--detach here --�------�------�------�------�-----�------Texas A&M University at Texarkana contrat d’etude Name: (Print)_____________________________________________________ Student I.D.______________________________________________________ By my signature affixed, I acknowledge that I have read, understood, and will comply with all terms and conditions of this syllabus, including but not limited to ‘withdrawing’, ‘conduct’, and ‘scholastic honesty’, and that the explanations of the syllabus offered by the instructor were sufficient for comprehension of the syllabus: ______________________________________________________, _____________________ (Name) (Date) (12 JANUARY 2011) 7