AGU-07-Kattawar

advertisement

Virtues of polarization in remote sensing of atmospheres and oceans

George W. Kattawar

Department of Physics and Institute for Quantum Studies

Texas A&M University

Research Colleagues:

Deric Gray, Ping Yang, Yu You, Peng-Wang Zhai, Zhibo Zhang

Scattering Geometry

Scattering object i

Incident beam E

E i

Scattering plane

E s

Scattering amplitude matrix

E s

 Scattering angle

E s

E s

  e ikr

 ikr

S

2

S

4

S

3

S

1

E i

E i

Stokes vector-Mueller matrix formulation

The electric field can be resolved into components. E l and E r are complex oscillatory functions.

E = E l l + E r r

The four component Stokes vector can now be defined.

They are all real numbers and satisfy the relation

I 2 = Q 2 + U 2 + V 2

I

E l

E l

Q

E l

E l

E

E r r

E

 r

E

 r

U

E l

E

 r

V

 i ( E l

E

 r

E r

E l

E r

E l

)

I

I l l

I r

I r

The Mueller matrix relates the incident and scattered Stokes vectors 

V s

I

Q s s

U s

M

M

21

M

11

31

M

41

M

12

M

22

M

32

M

42

M

13

M

23

M

33

M

43

M

M

14

24

M

34

M

44

Ii

Q

U i i

V i

Stokes vector and polarization parameters

I is the radiance (this is what the human eye sees)

Q is the amount of radiation that is polarized in the 0/90 0 orientation

U is the amount of radiation polarized in the +/-45 0 orientation

V is the amount of radiation that is right or left circularly polarized

DOP= Degree of polarization=

Q

2 

U

2 

V

2

/ I

DOLP = Degree of linear polarization =

Q

2

DOCP = Degree of circular polarization = |V|/I

U

2

Orientation of plane of polarization =   tan -1 (U/Q)

/ I

Ellipticity= Ratio of semiminor to semimajor axis of polarization ellipse=b/a

=tan[(sin -1 (V/I))/2]

Polarizer and analyzer settings for Mueller matrix measurements

Diagram showing the input polarization

(first symbol) and output analyzer orientation (second symbol) to determine each element of the SSMM denoted by S ij

For example, HV denotes horizontal input

. polarized light and a vertical polarization analyzer. The corresponding symbols denoting polarization are V, vertical; H, horizontal; P, +45  , M, -45  ; R, right handed circular polarization; L, left handed circular polarization; and O, open or no polarization optics. This set of measurements was first deduced by Bickel and Bailey.

S

11

(OO)

S

12

S

13

S

14

(HO-VO) (PO-MO) (LO-RO)

S

21

S

22

(OH-OV) (HH-VV) -

(HV+VH)

S

23

(PH-MV) -

(PV+MH)

S

24

(LH-RV) -

(LV+RH)

S

31

S

32

S

33

(OP-OM) (HP-VM) - (PP-MM) -

(HM+VP) (PM+MP)

S

34

(LP-RM) -

(LM+RP)

S

41

(OL-OR)

S

42

(HL-VR) -

(HR+VL)

S

43

(PL-MR) -

(PR+ML)

S

44

(LL-RR) -

(RL+LR)

Plankton as viewed by a squid

Planktonic animal as seen through "regular" vision

As seen when placed between two crossed linear polarizing filters

As seen by putting the two polarizers at 45 ° to each other

Contrast enhancement using polarization

Photo taken with a flash lamp and no polarization optics

Photo taken with circular polarized light for illumination and a circular analyzer for viewing

I

Nissan car viewed in mid-wave infrared

Q U

V

This data was collected using an Amber MWIR InSb imaging array 256x256.

The polarization optics consisted of a rotating quarter wave plate and a linear polarizer. Images were taken at eight different positions of the quarter wave plate

(22.5 degree increments) over 180 degrees. The data was reduced to the full

Stokes vector using a Fourier transform data reduction technique.

Bacillus anthracis

QuickTime™ and a

TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture.

Experimental Setup

Yong-Le Pan, Kevin B. Aptowicz, Richard K. Chang, Matt Hart, and Jay D. Eversole,

Characterizing and monitoring respiratory aerosols by light scattering, Optics Letters ,

Vol. 28, No. 8, p589 (2003).

 x source y

Coordinate Setup

detector y x

Z ’ z

Laser beam

ˆ  ˆ  ˆ z

The symmetry axis is in the yz plane.

Mueller Image Generating Method

We plot the reduced mueller matrix elements on a circular plane shown as in the figure below.

Reduced mueller matrix means all mueller elements except M11 are normalized to M11, which are in the range from -1 to +1.

For the M11 element, we use the phase matrix P11 value.

y

90

M(

,

)

In our mueller image generation, radial position has linear relation to the scattering polar angle. The actual experimental detection may not have same relation. The resultant images will be different than the images shown here.

-90 r

90 x r

180

-90

,

  

90,180



Outer coat

 =0.5

 m

Particle Model-1: Spore

1.0

 m

Inner coat

Cortex

0.8

 m

Core

Philip J. Wyatt, “Differential Light Scattering: a Physical

Method for Identifying Living Bacterial Cells”, Applied

Optics, Vol.7,No. 10,1879 (1968)

Simulation Models

m=1.34

0.8μm

(a)

1.0μm

(b) m=1.34

1.0 or 2.0

μm

0.5 μm

(c) (d)

Homogenous Spore Mueller Image

= 0 o

 =0.5

 m m=1.34

1.0

 m

0.8  m

Spore with Core Mueller Image

= 0 o

 =0.5

 m

Core 1.0

 m

0.8

 m

Homogenous Cylinder Mueller Image height=1

 m,

=0 o m=1.35

1.0

 m

0.5

 m

= 0.532

 m

m=1.35

Homogenous Cylinder Mueller Image height = 2

 m,

= 0 o

2.0

 m

0.5

 m

= 0.532

 m

Mueller Image for Three Particles 

=90 o

 =0.5

 m

P

11

P

33

P

34

P

44 m=1.34

1.0

 m

0.8  m

1.0

 m

0.8  m

1.0

 m

0.5

 m m=1.35

= 0.532

 m

Properties of the Target

2. Depolarizing

1 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

 0 0 0 0

R = 0.10 m.f.p.s

R = 0.067

The target reflects light with a Lambertian distribution. The albedo is constant across surface, but each annular region has a different reduced Mueller matrix .

R = 0.033

1. Polarization

Preserving

1 0 0 0

 0 1 0 0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

1

3. Painted Surface

1 0

0 0.61

0

0 0

0 0

0

0

0

0

0.58

0

0.51

Geometry of the Imaging System

Incident Beam

Detector

Detector resolution

Detector field of view

Target Depth

Medium

Target

Properties of the Model

The attenuation coefficient is fixed , but the absorption and scattering coefficients can be varied. All distances are given in units of photon mean free path (m.f.p.)

 The system is assumed to be an active source , so there is full control over all aspects of both source and detector.

 The detector details are intentionally left out; only the radiometric quantities at the detector location are calculated.

 The problem is solved for a time-independent case.

Inherent Optical Properties of the

Medium

Two classes of phase functions are used to describe the scattering by the medium:

 Henyey-Greenstein (HG):

  

HG

 g

4

1

1

 g 2

 1 2 g

  g 2

3

2

 g

 cos

 

 Two-Term Henyey-Greenstein (TTH):

  

TTH g g

1 2

)

   

HG g

1

   

HG

  g

2

)

0

1

The single-scatter reduced Mueller matrix for ocean water is taken to be that of Rayleigh scattering :

1 b

0 0 b

1 0 0

0 0 d

0

0 0 0 d

 b

  cos cos

2

2





1

1

2cos cos 2



1

Results

 The target depth is kept constant at 2 m.f.p.s

 The target albedo is kept constant with a value of 0.025

 The effective Mueller matrix elements of the system are calculated for different phase functions and single scatter albedos of the medium.

 Due to the form of the matrix elements of the target and the backscattering geometry of the imaging system, only the diagonal elements of the effective Mueller matrix are non-zero.

Mueller Matrix Elements

HG g=0.95 phase function Medium Albedo = 0.25

m

11 m

22 m

33 m

44

HG g=0.5

v = 0.5

v = 0.25

Radiance

HG g=0.8

v = 0.5

v = 0.25

v

HG g=0.95

= 0.5

v = 0.25

TTH SBP v = 0.5

v = 0.25

TTH LBP v = 0.5

v = 0.25

HG g=0.5

v = 0.5

v = 0.25

%

22

HG g=0.8

v = 0.5

v = 0.25

v

HG g=0.95

= 0.5

v = 0.25

TTH SBP v = 0.5

v = 0.25

TTH LBP v = 0.5

v = 0.25

HG g=0.5

v = 0.5

v = 0.25

%

33

HG g=0.8

v = 0.5

v = 0.25

v

HG g=0.95

= 0.5

v = 0.25

TTH SBP v = 0.5

v = 0.25

TTH LBP v = 0.5

v = 0.25

HG g=0.5

v = 0.5

v = 0.25

%

44

HG g=0.8

v = 0.5

v = 0.25

v

HG g=0.95

= 0.5

v = 0.25

TTH SBP v = 0.5

v = 0.25

TTH LBP v = 0.5

v = 0.25

0.004

Mueller Matrix Elements

Medium Albedo = 0.25

Radiance M

1.0

0.003

0.8

0.002

0.6

0.001

0.4

0.000

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.2

0.0

M

0.2

0.0

-0.2

-0.4

-0.6

0.2

0.0

-0.2

-0.4

-0.6

-0.8

-0.8

-1.0

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

Radial Distance from Target Center (m.f.p.)

-1.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

0.2

M

0.2

0.3

HG g=0.95

HG g=0.8

HG g=0.5

TTH LBP

TTH SBP

0.3

0.4

0.4

0.008

Mueller Matrix Elements

Medium Albedo = 0.5

Radiance

M

1.0

0.8

0.006

0.6

0.004

0.002

0.000

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.4

0.2

0.0

M

0.2

0.0

-0.2

-0.4

-0.6

0.2

0.0

-0.2

-0.4

-0.6

-0.8

-0.8

-1.0

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

Radial Distance from Target Center (m.f.p.)

-1.0

0.0

0.1

0.1

M

0.2

0.2

0.3

HG g=0.95

HG g=0.8

HG g=0.5

TTH LBP

TTH SBP

0.3

0.4

0.4

Conclusions

Only correct way to do radiative transfer calculations

Mueller matrix contains all the elastic scattering information one can obtain from either a single particle or an ensemble of particles

• Provides a unique “fingerprint” of particle morphology, orientation, and optical properties

Can provide information about surface features of objects which can’t be obtained with ordinary radiance measurements

Can even be used for the detection of precancerous skin lesions

Download