English 102 Section 1011– Composition I Course Outline/Policies Instructor: Laurel Topken Class: Tuesday/Thursday 9:30-10:45/11-12:15 Number of Credits: 3 Transferability of Course within Nevada: This course is designed to apply toward a WNC degree and/or transfer to other schools within the Nevada System of Higher Education, depending on the degree chosen and other courses completed. It may transfer to colleges and universities outside Nevada. For information about how this course can transfer and apply to your program of study, please contact a counselor. Linkage of Course to Educational Program Mission and Outcomes: This course is a degree requirement for the Associate of Arts and Associate of Science degrees and satisfies the 3-credit writing requirement for these degrees. It is designed to provide instruction that contributes to a student’s personal, social and intellectual growth by fostering the abilities to speak and write effectively; to think critically and solve problems, … to locate and evaluate information resources; and to appreciate the arts and the humanities. English 101 also contributes to WNC’s General Education Mission: The purpose of the Associate of General Studies degree is to provide academic knowledge and skills for personal growth, professional advancement, and/or successful transfer. Instructor Contact Information: Office hours: email: lktopken@gmail.com Laurel.Topken@wnc.edu Mondays 5-7 at the Daily Grind Tuesdays 1-2 in Pinion Hall You can also leave a message at the Fallon office. Course Description in WNC Catalog: Continues the study of expository writing. Students read and analyze writing and discursive techniques of interpretation, argument, and research. Course Objectives or Outcomes: Upon completion of this course the student should be able to: Read and think critically Purposefully interact with professional and academic audiences. Engage in critical inquiry. Learn to explore, observe, and synthesize information both orally or in writing. Discuss and write about college level topics with critical insight, precision, and clarity. Topken 2 Required Materials Bullock, Richard, Maureen Daly Goggin, and Francine Weinberg. The Norton Field Guide To Writing with Reading and Handbook. 3rd e. New York: W.W. Norton and Co., 2013. Print. Hacker, Diana, and Nancy Sommers. The Bedford Handbook. 9th e. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2010. Print. Beavan, Colin. No Impact Man: Adventrues of a Guilty Liberal Who Attempts to Save the Planet and the Discoveries He Makes About Himeslf and Our Way of Life in the Process. New York: Picador, 2009. Print. Notebook for journal and homework Grading Policy and Procedures: Your grade will be calculated as an average of the grades earned on assignments. Fs will be given when applicable. There is a maximum of 800 points to be earned. Your course grade will be calculated as follows: Preparation and Participation 20 Peer Response 150 Writing Assignments 180 Presentation 100 Journal 25 Homework (3 at 5 points each) 15 Reading Responses (5 at 10 each) 50 Annotated Bibliography 25 Experiment/Study/Survey 100 Conference with Ron 20 Justification of Source 20 Chapter Responses (15 at 5 each) 75 Research Post 20 Grade Scale: A 100-94 A- 93-90 B+ 89-87 B 86-83 BC+ C C- 82-80 79-77 76-73 72-70 D+ D DF 69-67 66-63 62-60 59-0 If you withdraw yourself from the course, you will receive a W. Last day to withdraw with a W is March 27. If you drop out of sight and do not officially withdraw yourself, or if you plagiarize, turn in unacceptable college-level work, or fail to turn in every written assignment, you will receive an F. Early Alert System – Please note that in an effort to help students successfully complete their courses, the Counseling office on campus will ask faculty for names of students they feel may be in need of additional assistance. A counselor may contact you to offer some ideas. Topken 3 Scholarly Honesty/ Plagiarism: Plagiarism is taking someone else’s work and claiming it to be your own. This can be intentional or accidental; that is by choice or by carelessness and misunderstanding. Plagiarizing may result in a failing grade on the paper and/or failure of the course. Attendance and Late Work: Since this course requires everyone’s participation, you have 2 classes you can miss without potential consequences. Use it wisely; you never know if there will be a time when you absolutely cannot make it to class. Absences over 2 will result in your being unable to earn over an A in the class, 4 a B, 6 a C, and with 8 you will not be able to pass the course. If you must miss class (death in the family, personal emergency, ECT), you must contact me on the day of the missed class or immediately after to make arrangements. If you must miss class for school activities (band, athletics, etc), you must bring me, before the absences happen, a list, signed by the appropriate faculty or athletic department member, of the dates the absence(s) will occur. You are responsible for all assignments, whether you are in class or not. Part of your attendance is arriving to class on-time, actively participating, and staying for the entire class period. Being late to class or leaving early 3 times will count as an absence. Our workshop days are the most important days; they cannot be made up and others are affected by your absence. If you miss them it will affect your grade. Reading and writing assignments are to be completed at the beginning of the class they were scheduled for. If you absolutely cannot make it to class send your work with a friend. All late papers will be docked a letter grade for every week it is late, and will not be accepted beyond two weeks. No late papers will be accepted after May 4. I will not be giving any extra credit points during the semester except for 5 points per paper for going to the Academic Skills Center (ASC). If you are absent multiple times and would like to make up for one class time, you must write a two page paper about going somewhere in Fallon or Fernley. This could be to the park, an event, or even a business. Only one absence may be made up. Your presence and participation is important to this class. Preparation and Participation: To receive full credit for this portion of your grade, you must come prepared and willing to participate. That means that you have completed any reading or writing required and are ready to discuss or do activities with your classmates. You will join in on the discussions and activities, contributing to the lesson with your perspective and thoughts. Quizzes may be given on reading assignments due to lack of participation. You must also have your writing assignments ready to turn in at the beginning of class. Writing Assignments: In this class, you will be writing one argument paper 8-12 pages, two 3-5 page essays, and multiple short papers. You will read essays and stories to help you with your assignments and workshop the rough drafts of the essays and the research paper. Topken 4 All written assignments must be completed to pass the course. Any two papers may be revised for a better grade. The revised papers need to be resubmitted within one week after the original has been returned, and must be accompanied with the original. In all cases of revision, the final assigned grade will be an average of the original and rewritten scores. A revision does not automatically guarantee an improved grade. There must be substantial improvement in the revision (not simply correcting errors) to warrant a higher grade. Document Style: In this class, we will use the MLA Format to cite other’s writing. The papers will be in Times New Roman 12 point font double spaced with 1 inch margins on white paper with black ink. The page number must be in the upper right corner, and the entire assignment must be stapled before class. No title pages are necessary; simply list your name, date, my name and assignment double spaced in the upper left hand corner. Your title should be centered double spaced below your information, and the body of the paper double spaced below the title. All papers must be at least to the bottom of the minimum page requirement, and will include a rough draft. Students with Disabilities: *If you have a disability for which you will need to request accommodations, please contact Susan Trist, Coordinator for Disability Support Services at 775-445-3268 or susan.trist@wnc.edu as soon as possible to arrange for appropriate accommodations. If an issue occurs, that will affect your education, please contact a counselor immediately. They are there to help you get the most out of your time in college. Please note that in an effort to help students successfully complete their courses, the Counseling office on campus will ask faculty for names of students they feel may be in need of additional assistance. A counselor may contact you to offer some ideas. Code of Conduct: We are a class full of adults and I expect considerate behavior. This is a class, as well as Western Nevada College, where ideas are shared, debated, and sometimes argued over. I encourage this, as it is one of the great reasons to come to college. But be aware that others may not share the same values as you and you should judge your comments and actions accordingly and speak respectfully. If you become disruptive, I will ask you to leave or have you taken out of the class. Some of the papers you will read in class may be sensitive; they need to be handled with care. Do not discuss them with people not taking the class. On the other hand, keep in mind that when you share your writing it then becomes public. You may want to carefully consider what you write about. Do you want others to know about this topic? Will you be able to take constructive criticism on the writing? Finally, please turn off your electronic devices (i.e. cell phones, PDAs, MP3s, ect.) and put away your ear buds and headphones at the beginning of class. If there are multiple offences you may lose participation credit for the day. Lap tops may be allowed on workshop days with prior approval. Also, there will be no texting in class. Any cell Topken 5 phone use in class will result in having to write a cell phone poem and reading it in class that day. If you fail to do this, you will lose your participation points for the day. Additional Resources: Your class mates and I are your prime resources. Workshopping, office time, and before and after class you can talk to me or your classmates about the assignments. Also, in the event that you do miss a class, make sure to contact a classmate or me for the next class’s assignment. It is your responsibility to find out what you missed (handouts, changes, due dates, etc.) Missing a class is no excuse for coming to the next class unprepared. Conferences – It is suggested to attend a conference with me before the last drop date. Class time has not been set aside for these conferences. Academic Skills Center (ASC) – Visits to the tutors in the ASC are not required, but they can give you five extra credit points on every final draft. This only counts if you attended the scheduled class workshop, you spend at least ½ hour with a tutor working on your draft, and the tutor signs your sheet. If you miss a workshop, you can only make it up by going to the ASC. For these visits, you will need to make an appointment. The ASC is located in Room 307 in Getto Hall, Fallon Campus. Go through the library to the back and through the double glass doors on the left. The ASC phone number is 423-7565 ext. 2278. Grammar and Punctuation practice – We will be working on some of these issues in class but I recommend doing additional practice or work on specific problems through www.dianahacker.com/bedhandbook; www.bedfordstmartins.com/exercisecentral or additional exercises out of the handbook. English 101 Composition and Rhetoric Tuesday/Thursday Spring 2015 Tentative Syllabus Week 1 Read 1/20 Introduce semester plans, explain the roll of No Impact Man No Impact Man, Syllabus and assignment explanation Post on Canvas about Research 1/22 Active and critical reading Ron to discuss Research Process Chapter Response on Canvas Due Bedford 109-126 No Impact Man Week 2 1/27 Reader’s Response Due No Impact Man Assign Information Paper and subsequent assignments Get a book on your topic Watch movie Topken 1/29 Amazon Reader’s Response Due Watch movie Discuss movie and book Week 3 Understanding Approach 2/3 Ron to talk about research projects question vs. Question Joining the discussion Chapter Response on Canvas Due 2/5 Reasoning behind course research papers Innovated thinking Scientific method Reading Response Due on Canvas Week 4 Brainstorming and Narrowing Topic 2/10 Discussion of topics in No Impact Man Brainstorming Chapter Response on Canvas Due 2/12 Familiarize self with Norton chapters 48-50 and Bedford part X Norton 19-24, 87-94 “Into the Wild” Norton 251-254, 105-107 Narrowing the topic Must meet with Ron by the end of this class to discuss topics and research plan Week 5 Research 2/17 Discuss research Research time 2/19 Gather sources on assigned topic Reading Response Due on Canvas “Shipbreakers” Week 6 2/24 Ron to evaluate some of those sources You’ve evaluated the sources, now what Chapter Responses on Canvas Due Norton 421-431 Bedford 515-529 2/26 Norton 457-461 Citations both in-text and works cited Chapter Response on Canvas Due Week 7 Note Taking 3/3 Annotated Bibliography Due Note taking discussion Chapter Responses on Canvas Due Norton 462-474 Bedford 530-537 6 Topken 3/5 Thesis statement discussion Chapter Response on Canvas Due Week 8 Drafting 3/10 Drafting exercise Chapter Response on Canvas Due 3/12 Bedford 557-562 Bedford 570-581 Revisions Exercise Peer Response Week 9 3/17 Spring Break 3/19 Spring Break Week 10 3/24 Informative Paper Due Assign Position Paper More work on citations Chapter Response on Canvas Due 3/26 Critical Thinking Assign Experiment/Survey/Study 3/27 Last day to withdraw with a “W” Norton 13-15 Week 11 3/31 Position discussion on chosen topic 4/2 Watch documentary and discuss Week 12 4/7 Justification of Source Due Experiment Results Due “Debate” 4/9 Revisions exercise Peer Response Week 13 4/14 Position Paper Due Assign Argument Paper Putting it all together Chapter Responses on Canvas Due Norton 119-151 Bedford 141-175 7 Topken 4/16 Watch “Trashed” Reading Response Due on Canvas “Dumpster Diving” Week 14 4/21 Audience and Purpose Chapter Response on Canvas Due Norton 4-9 4/23 Norton 323-341 Voice, Introductions and Conclusions Chapter Response on Canvas Due Week 15 4/28 Claims and Opposing claims Review citations and common errors Chapter Response on Canvas Due 4/30 Revisions exercise Peer Response Week 16 5/5 Argument Paper Due Work on presentations 5/7 Work on presentations Week 17 5/12 Presentations 5/14 Presentations Norton 731-745 8 Topken 9 Research Rubric Below are the criteria used to evaluate your research paper in English 102. Each section is given a numeric value of 1-5: 0 or 1 indicates it wasn’t done/non-existent, 2 means poor, 3 indicates average or acceptable, 4 means good or above average, and 5 denotes excellence or nearly perfect. With these values totaled, a paper may receive a maximum of 60 points. A chart on the next the page offers a breakdown of these point totals and their equivalence to a letter grade. Audience How advanced is the essay’s content? Does it respond appropriately to a controversy or debatable issue that concerns a college level audience? Is the paper part of a larger and significant discussion that is somehow relevant or important to adults who are critical thinkers? So what? Main Point Is the paper’s introduction effective? Does its beginning, first paragraph(s), effectively introduce the paper’s topic and state a clear thesis? Are paragraphs in the essay’s body controlled by the thesis? Do clear topic sentences (or implied supporting points) relate or point the reader back to the thesis? Do these topic sentences (stated or implied) control the content within each paragraph? If any paragraphs do not develop a specific supporting point for the thesis, do they otherwise function effectively within the discussion of the paper’s thesis (such as explanatory transitions between two supporting paragraphs)? Mechanics Is the essay correctly written? In forming sentences, has the writer followed proper grammatical rules and used proper punctuation (commas, pronouns, apostrophes, etc)? Are sentences correctly constructed in order to avoid sentence fragments, run-ons, and confusing phrases? Has the writer avoided other errors: verb or tense shifts, spelling mistakes, and incorrect word choice? Does the essay demonstrate effective use of style and voice? Has the writer selected varied and interesting words that avoid needless repetition? Does the essay maintain a consistent and effective point of view (3 rd person only)? In other ways, is its tone appropriate for its purpose and its audience: does it avoid slang, stock phrases, and contractions, for example? Does the essay use correct MLA formatting and documentation? Proper in-text citations? Block quote use? Works cited page? Proper MLA heading, margins, and indentation? Organization Is the paper well organized overall? Are there effective, logical transitions between supporting paragraphs in the body of the essay? And are the paragraphs in the body of the paper generally arranged with an effective logical strategy? Does the writing flow? Does the concluding paragraph clearly relate the author’s ideas/content/argument to a larger social discussion or issue, or otherwise effectively wrap up the writer’s main point? Is the organization within the paragraphs effective? Within each paragraph, is there a clear pattern of development from a topic sentence to the evidence that supports this topic sentence? Does logical linking language effectively demonstrate the connection between the writer’s evidence and his or hers supporting idea? Is the evidence arranged in an effective organizational pattern? Does the writing flow? Support Does the paper provide adequate proof for its argument (quotations, paraphrased information, data, experience, research, etc.)? Are the connections between the writer’s evidence and his or her claims clear? Do supporting paragraphs in the body develop distinct points, each of which meaningfully advances the writer’s argument? Has the writer provided enough support to answer reasonable and important questions from his or her audience? Does the paper use quality evidence for its argument? Has the writer used salient details, credible facts, data from peer reviewed and scholarly research, properly cited quotations from subject experts or otherwise reliable sources? Has the writer avoided dubious sources that undermine the credibility of the argument? Have these sources been properly cited in a works cited page? Voice Has the writer integrated the voices of the source into his or her voice? Are there jumps or distinct places where it is obvious that the writer has copied the voice of the source being used? Does the paper flow between the writer’s voice and the source’s? Are sources used effectively in context to the point being made? Is there evidence of sound research questions being used? Does the writer critically look at the topic and try to find an innovative approach to the subject? Is there indication that the writer stayed away from researching for their established point of view? Does the writer consider multiple points of view on the topic? Are various options explored? Topken 10 60-57 56-54 53-52 51-50 49-48 47-46 A AB+ B BC+ 45-44 43-42 41-40 39-38 37-36 35-0 C CD+ D DF