UNIVERSITY OF THE ARTS LONDON EQUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT: THE WELLBEING POLICY Aim: University of the Arts London is committed to enhancing the quality of its policies, strategies, functions and procedures to ensure wherever possible, any impact is duly considered and appraised to be fair and inclusive to all who participate in our University life. Context: The Public Sector Equality Duty (Equality Act 2010, s149) requires HEIs to demonstrate 'due regard' to eliminate discrimination, promote equality of opportunity and foster good relations between those that share protected characteristics and those that do not. The legally protected characteristics are Age, Disability, Ethnicity, Gender Reassignment, Maternity and Pregnancy (Caring Responsibilities), Race, Religion or Belief and Sexual Orientation. For the purposes of Widening Participation in HE, Social Class is also considered for students. Due regard essentially means to: 1. 2. 3. 4. Remove or minimise disadvantage (barriers) Meet different needs Encourage participation Tackle prejudice (bias) and promote understanding. Purpose: The purpose of the Equalities Screening is to: a) Evidence, through research statistics and consultation, the impact of a policy, strategy or function on those with protected characteristics. b) Identify and prioritise actions that could improve or enhance any impact OR where changes are not possible, to justify why this is so. c) Incorporate these actions into existing and relevant business or strategic priorities. Process 1. Consult with Diversity Team 2. Gather Evidence of Impact 3. Consider Impact & Actions in Relevant Committee(s) 4. Submit Screening for Approval at EDLG 5. Incorporate Actions into Business/ Strategic Plans 1 Equality Screening Template - GENERIC EQUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT 1. ABOUT YOUR POLICY, STRATEGY OR FUNCTION a) Title b) Purpose c) Name of policy, strategy or function Lead THE WELLBEING POLICY This Policy sets out the framework to manage and monitor wellbeing at work, the responsibilities of all staff and the resources available to fulfill those responsibilities. Eleanor Pirie, Head of Health and Safety. d) In scope for consideration The Wellbeing Policy See Appendix 1. Stress Risk Assessment Guide for Managers See Appendix 2 e) Priority Lines of Enquiry agreed 1) Identify ways that the Wellbeing Policy and Stress Risk Assessment Guide can address the needs of staff with specific protected characteristics (as identified below) that may be particularly vulnerable to stress. In particular: Staff with existing or recurrent mental health conditions Pregnant staff. Staff with caring responsibilities. All staff with protected characteristics that believe they are experiencing harassment or bullying due to their protected characteristics 2) To determine how managers can be supported to spot stress, carry out risk assessments and provide options to alleviate that stress. a) Other Committees / Groups / Networks consulted The Policy and Guide were circulated to the Disabled Staff Network, GEMS and Queer@arts staff networks on the 21st September. Feedback was received from one member of staff. The comments were positive and related to queries about how the Policy will be enforced. The Policy was written in consultation with the Trade Unions over the course of three meetings and several follow up emails. The Policy was considered at the University Health and Safety Committee see Appendix 3. No substantive changes were made 2 Equality Screening Template - GENERIC EQUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT 2. FINDINGS Please set out the key findings from your EIA and recommend at least THREE actions that could be undertaken to ensure the policy, strategy or function has a positive impact on promoting equality, minimises barriers that affect different groups, and eliminates discrimination in relation to the protected characteristics. a) Protected Characteristic (s) Disability Evidenced Impact Justification or Action Point (please include by whom and by when) 1) Identify ways that the Wellbeing Policy and Programme can address the needs of staff with specific protected characteristics (as identified below) that may be particularly vulnerable to stress. Staff (including those defined as disabled) with current, long-term or recurrent mental health conditions. Context According to the Mental Health Foundation, estimates suggest that 1 in 4 people will experience a mental health condition in the course of a year. Mixed anxiety & depression is the most common mental disorder in Britain, with almost 9% of people meeting criteria for diagnosis. Many mental health conditions will be defined as a disability under the Equality Act 2010 if they are long term / recurrent (beyond 12 months), substantial and impact on normal day to day activities. See Mind Rights and Legislation. The Health and Safety Executive noted that the total number of cases of stress in 2011/12 was 428 000 (40%) out of a total of 1 073 000 for all work-related Action One: H&S Ensure that the Guidance also includes reference to the legal requirement of Managers and the University to provide reasonable adjustments to staff who are currently, or are likely to be defined as disabled under the terms of the Equality Act 2010, or Disability Discrimination Act 2005 or 1995 in relation to experiencing stress, anxiety or other mental health conditions. Action Two: H&S and Diversity Team Link the Policy and Guide with the University’s Valuing Disabled Colleagues programme which explains the procedure for undertaking workplace assessments by a disability/health specialist (e.g. Access to Work or Occupational Health), along with resources and recommendations for workplace adjustments that may be appropriate for staff managing mental health conditions at work. Action Three: H&S, HR and Diversity Team 3 Equality Screening Template - GENERIC EQUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT 2. FINDINGS Please set out the key findings from your EIA and recommend at least THREE actions that could be undertaken to ensure the policy, strategy or function has a positive impact on promoting equality, minimises barriers that affect different groups, and eliminates discrimination in relation to the protected characteristics. illnesses. Only 6 people disclosed a mental health disability via Employee Self Service at UAL in the year 2010-11. This compared to 39 people in the Disabled Staff Survey of January 2012. Suggesting that staff may either not consider themselves to meet the legal definition of disability or that they are concerned to formally disclose a mental health condition as a disability through UAL’s official HR Management Information systems. However, ‘Stress, debility or depression’ accounted for 32.3% of sickness absence in 2010/11, an increase of 13.1% on the previous year. See Equality and Diversity Framework Progress Report. It is unclear whether reasonable adjustment absences taken by staff to attend regular counselling or psychotherapy are being recorded as sickness absence due to stress or to attend hospital / medical appointments on iTrent. More than 15 days of sickness absence triggers a referral to Occupational Health and the Sickness Absence Procedure. Impact: The Wellbeing Policy and Stress Assessment Guide could serve as a proactive means of aiding individuals Explore whether absences that relate to attendance at external or EAP counselling or psychotherapy constitute selfmanagement of a mental health condition / reasonable adjustment; should these absences be recorded as sickness absence or special leave? Would such absences trigger use of the Stress Assessment Guide or the Sickness Absence Procedure? ►Further Proposal: A programme promoting mental health wellbeing for students and staff could be developed for 201314 in collaboration with other University departments. It could promote: The prevalence and innovation of creative practitioners with mental health conditions. Linking with UAL’s Thou Art research project. Linking with the work of Dr Jenny Tillotson Senior Research Fellow CSM, that focuses on Scentsory Design®: the relationship between Aromachology (the science of smell) and emotional wellbeing. http://www.csm.arts.ac.uk/research/staffresearchprofiles/dr jennytillotson/ The ongoing events of the Wellbeing Events programme The benefits of flexible working arrangements as a workplace adjustment Employee Assistance Programme’s counselling service and health advice. Links with national mental health campaigns e.g. Time to 4 Equality Screening Template - GENERIC EQUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT 2. FINDINGS Please set out the key findings from your EIA and recommend at least THREE actions that could be undertaken to ensure the policy, strategy or function has a positive impact on promoting equality, minimises barriers that affect different groups, and eliminates discrimination in relation to the protected characteristics. and their line managers to identify and manage mental health conditions (including stress and depression) in the workplace before and after a sickness absence occurs; but also during the course of employment by ensuring appropriate workplace adjustments are in place. This could be useful for those staff that choose not to request workplace adjustments or self identify themselves as ‘disabled’ through Employee Self Service but could benefit from support. Change, Rethink and Mind. Profiles of Staff with Mental Health Conditions. By Equality and Diversity Team, Health and Safety, Disabled Staff Network, SU. The Policy and Guide could also refer to the legal requirement to provide reasonable adjustments to staff with mental health conditions (such as depression, anxiety) that are covered by the disability provisions of the Equality Act 2010. b) Protected Characteristic (s) Evidenced Impact Caring Responsibilities Staff with caring responsibilities Context: According to Carers UK, 1 in 8 people are carers in the UK (just under six million people). This could include caring for an ill partner or friend, an older parent or a disabled child. People providing high levels of care are twice as likely to be permanently sick or disabled themselves: Justification or Action Point (please include by whom and by when) Action Four: H&S Ensure that the Policy and Guide also includes reference to the Employment Act 2002 and 2007 that requires the University to consider requests for flexible working or unpaid time off from staff Carers of children (17 or under), disabled children (under 17) and adults who are relatives or live at the same address as the staff member. 5 Equality Screening Template - GENERIC EQUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT 2. FINDINGS Please set out the key findings from your EIA and recommend at least THREE actions that could be undertaken to ensure the policy, strategy or function has a positive impact on promoting equality, minimises barriers that affect different groups, and eliminates discrimination in relation to the protected characteristics. 625,000 people suffer mental and physical ill health as a direct consequence of the stress and physical demands of caring. 1.25 million people provide over 50 hours of care per week Action Five: H&S, HRMI and Diversity Team Initiate better monitoring of the numbers of staff with Caring Responsibilities through ESS and Flexible Working Requests; and cross reference Stress Related Sickness Absence with this group. It is difficult to internally identify the numbers of UAL staff at risk of stress due to their caring responsibilities due to the following factors: Action Six: H&S Promote the Policy and Guide to this group of staff and their managers if known. Caring responsibilities has only been introduced to Employee Self Service in recent years and disclosures are too low to be reliable. It is hoped that the Equality Information Campaign launched in December 2012 will improve this category being updated. ►Further Proposal: The Diversity Team is to propose a Caring Responsibilities programme for 2013/14. This may include: The numbers of staff making flexible working requests due to caring responsibilities is also unclear as there may not be a central HR record system in place. There is currently no Network for staff with caring responsibilities, although the Disabled Staff Network (DSN) also welcomes staff who are carers of disabled people to join. The DSN minutes to date do not suggest that Carers are raising issues in relation to stress or wellbeing to the Network. Appointment of an EB Caring Responsibilities Champion Promotion of the Wellbeing and Flexible Working policies and provisions for carers. Enhanced monitoring and analysis on ESS and Registry Launch of a Staff Network Links with national campaigns and charities e.g. Recognition of Carers Week and / or, Parents Week. Promotion of the advice and support to carers that the Employee Assistance Programme might offer. Collaboration with the Student Union to promote provisions and support for student carers. By: Equality and Diversity Team / Health and Safety / Student 6 Equality Screening Template - GENERIC EQUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT 2. FINDINGS Please set out the key findings from your EIA and recommend at least THREE actions that could be undertaken to ensure the policy, strategy or function has a positive impact on promoting equality, minimises barriers that affect different groups, and eliminates discrimination in relation to the protected characteristics. Union / HR / Disabled Staff Network / EB Caring Impact: Responsibilities Champion Staff Carers would appear to be group that is vulnerable to stress and thus might benefit from introduction of the Wellbeing Policy and Stress Assessment Guide. Both documents could refer to this group in particular and to the University’s statutory requirement to consider flexible working requests and unpaid time off by staff with caring responsibilities (see UAL Flexible Working Policy). c) Protected Characteristic (s) Evidenced Impact Pregnancy and Maternity Pregnancy and Maternity Context For some women, adjusting to pregnancy and maternity can result in a range of mental health conditions including stress, anxiety disorders, antenatal and post natal depression. Justification or Action Point (please include by whom and by when) Action Seven: H&S, HRMI and Diversity Team Initiate better monitoring of pregnant women and maternity returners so that data on such staff can be cross referenced with stress related sickness absence. Action Eight H&S and HR Promote the Wellbeing Policy and Stress Assessment Guide to pregnant women and maternity returners and their line managers if known. A research review undertaken by Sharron S. Humenick, PhD, RN, LCCE, FAAN and Olivia S. Howell, MPH in their book ‘Perinatal Experiences: The Association of Stress, Childbearing, Breastfeeding, and Early Mothering’ suggests that women who experience ►Further Proposal: stress during pregnancy can result in other health The Wellbeing Policy/Programme could be promoted as part difficulties for mother and child including: of a wider programme to specifically focus on the 7 Equality Screening Template - GENERIC EQUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT 2. FINDINGS Please set out the key findings from your EIA and recommend at least THREE actions that could be undertaken to ensure the policy, strategy or function has a positive impact on promoting equality, minimises barriers that affect different groups, and eliminates discrimination in relation to the protected characteristics. Preterm births Lower birth weights Newborns scoring lower Agpar scores Difficulty in successful breastfeeding Postnatal depression According to the Royal College of Midwives, it is thought that more than 1 in 10 women experience post natal depression, a quarter of those continuing to have the condition up to the child’s first year or beyond. Evidence suggests that approximately two-thirds of women with postnatal depression had already been depressed ante natally; with only about three percent of women having a first-time depression after delivery (National Childbirth Trust). Impact: In the workplace stress experienced during pregnancy and maternity may lead to sickness absence and in some cases difficulties undertaking the same work, at the same locations during the same working hours. requirements of pregnant women and maternity returners. The Diversity Team proposes to develop a Pregnancy and Maternity Information Pack for 2013/14 to include: Policies: Wellbeing, Maternity Leave Policy and Flexible Working Policy, Caring Responsibilities Equality Scheme. Info on Health and Safety Risk Assessments (as appropriate) Maternity category included in concerns of proposed Caring Responsibilities Network Resources e.g. Quiet Spaces for rest/breastfeeding, External organisations Guidance for academics in relation to REF and research career development. Collation of resources for pregnant students and student parents. Lead: Diversity Team / H&S / SU in 2013. Thus it is possible that some pregnant staff experiencing antenatal depression will still be in work before commencing maternity leave or if experiencing post natal depression, may return to work before they are well enough to do so 8 Equality Screening Template - GENERIC EQUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT 2. FINDINGS Please set out the key findings from your EIA and recommend at least THREE actions that could be undertaken to ensure the policy, strategy or function has a positive impact on promoting equality, minimises barriers that affect different groups, and eliminates discrimination in relation to the protected characteristics. Maternity Returners are not currently monitored on iTrent so it is not possible to cross reference sickness absence with a pregnancy or maternity returner category. It is unknown how many cases involved stress as a Pregnancy related illness in 2010-11. d) Further/Other Evidenced Impact All protected characteristics All staff with protected characteristics that believe they are experiencing harassment or bullying due to their protected characteristics. Context Staff Complaints that related to Bullying and Harassment were as follows: 2010 / 2011 - there were 25 complaints, of which 6 cited bullying and / or harassment - so 24% 2009 / 10 - there were 42 complaints, of which 12 cited bullying and / or harassment - 28.6% Justification or Action Point (please include by whom and by when) Action eight: H&S, HR and Diversity Team The Wellbeing Policy and Stress Assessment Guide could be promoted as part of other initiatives designed to offer support to staff experiencing bullying or harassment such as: Staff Support Network Resolutions : Cultural Conflict Management (coming soon) Employee Assistance Programme (Counselling, health and legal advice). Impact It is unclear how many of these complaints related to a bullying or harassment allegation related to a protected characteristic or how many led to stress related 9 Equality Screening Template - GENERIC EQUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT 2. FINDINGS Please set out the key findings from your EIA and recommend at least THREE actions that could be undertaken to ensure the policy, strategy or function has a positive impact on promoting equality, minimises barriers that affect different groups, and eliminates discrimination in relation to the protected characteristics. absence. The Staff Support Network suggest there has been zero bullying and harassment cases brought to their attention since launch in October 2012. A promotion campaign is underway over Autumn 2012. All protected characteristics 2) To determine how managers can be supported to spot stress, carry out risk assessments and provide options to alleviate that stress. Context The HSE identifies several factors, (the ‘Management Standards’), that impact on the workplace and if managed well will make a positive contribution to both the workplace and an employee’s experience at work. http://www.hse.gov.uk/stress/roles/yourteam.htm If managed poorly or ignored they will have a negative impact. The factors the HSE have identified are: Action ten: H&S and D&L Providing stress management strategies as an online training tool so that all managers and staff are able to access techniques to identify and address stress and depression. For example CIPD tool: http://www.peoplemanagement.co.uk/pm/articles/2012/07/cipd -launches-free-stress-management-tool.htm Action eleven: H&S and D&L Continue to deliver and promote the Wellbeing Programme of The support of managers and colleagues and events across the University and encouraging staff and supportive, healthy relationships at work; clarity and managers to support attendance as appropriate. Monitor take understanding of role and the place a person has up as appropriate. See Appendix 4. Wellbeing Events Nov 12 within the organisation. Action twelve: H&S and D&L The demands of a person’s job; the goals of both Develop coaches on the UAL Coaching Network to be able to department and the organisation as a whole; coach managers to identify stress and provide stress The communication and speed of changes in the management techniques to coachees. work place, those that will personally affect an Action thirteen: H&S and D&L 10 Equality Screening Template - GENERIC EQUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT 2. FINDINGS Please set out the key findings from your EIA and recommend at least THREE actions that could be undertaken to ensure the policy, strategy or function has a positive impact on promoting equality, minimises barriers that affect different groups, and eliminates discrimination in relation to the protected characteristics. individual and the wider changes within the organisation. According to the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development’s (CIPD) quarterly Employee Outlook survey of 2,000 employees in January 2012, almost half (49%) of UK middle managers say they are under excessive pressure either everyday or once or twice a week, compared to a survey average of 37%. They are particularly unhappy with their work-life balance; just 44% agree they are satisfied with their work-life balance, compared to 70% among employees with no managerial responsibilities. http://www.cipd.co.uk/pressoffice/press-releases/newmeaning-squeezed-middle.aspx Impact Data from UAL Stress Survey(s) is not available. Consultation on the Valuing Disabled Colleagues programme suggested that staff with mental health conditions would prefer to speak to a disability specialist before disclosing to their manager or HR. Managers may need to gain the ‘trust‘ of their team members before expecting disclosure or engagement with a risk assessment. The mental health charity Mind also provides a useful leaflet on this: http://www.mindfulemployer.net/ Ensure mention of the Policy and Guide in training offered by Development and Learning. For example: Managing Diversity Skills Managing Performance Managing Planning, Review and Appraisal Managing Probation and Induction Managing Staff in Times of Change Action fourteen: H&S Reference other relevant UAL policies and initiatives in the Policy and/or Guide. For example: Valuing Disabled Colleagues: Workplace Adjustments Flexible Working Parental Leave Special Leave Adoption leave Formal Complaints (this is in the process of being revised) Drug and Alcohol Paternity Leave and Pay Maternity Leave Redeployment Sickness Absence Planning review and Appraisal Whistle blowing Policy Work life balance 11 Equality Screening Template - GENERIC EQUALITY SCREENING 3. REVIEW a) Please offer feedback on your experience of undertaking this Equality Screening. You are welcome to note that the EIA E&D Lead was absent in the end stages of you undertaking the EIA. b) Please indicate the local policies / strategies / business priorities / action plans your Actions will be incorporated into: Health and Safety Strategy Valuing Disabled Colleagues Future equality Projects on Mental Health, Pregnancy and Maternity and Caring Responsibilities? Human Resources Operating Plan c) Name and date of Senior Manager who has endorsed this Equality Screening: Nick Rogers / John Hallam? APPROVED BY THE EQUALITY AND DIVERSITY LEADERSHIP GROUP ON: EIA PUBLISHED ON: 12 Equality Screening Template - GENERIC APPENDICES Appendix 1 - The Wellbeing Policy The Wellbeing Policy Introduction 1. Work should be a stimulating and supportive environment that helps maintain positive mental and physical wellbeing. This Policy sets out the framework to manage and monitor wellbeing at work, the responsibilities of all staff and the resources available to fulfil those responsibilities. This Policy applies to all University employees. 2. As an employer the University has a legal responsibility to do everything reasonably practicable to maintain a healthy and safe workplace including minimising the likelihood and impact of stress at work. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) defines stress as the “adverse reaction people have to excessive pressure or other types of demand placed on them”. There is a fundamental difference between the experience of stress at work, which makes people ill and, in extreme cases can result in disability; and the stimulating aspects of a role which add to the fulfilment and satisfaction of a job. 3. If staff experience stress whilst at work, either because of the working environment or other factors external to their employment, the University has a legal duty to address the causes and re-establish a positive working environment whenever possible. The University is committed to doing everything reasonably practicable to enable a member of staff to remain in work and, if this is not possible for medical reasons, to support staff back into work as soon as possible including making any reasonable adjustments or managing absences in line with the University’s Policies 4. It is always better to avoid/manage a situation that negatively impacts on a person’s mental wellbeing rather than managing the consequences. The HSE identifies several factors, (the ‘Management Standards’), that impact on the workplace and if managed well will make a positive contribution to both the workplace and an employee’s experience at work. If managed poorly or ignored they will have a negative impact. The factors the HSE have identified are: The support of managers and colleagues and supportive, healthy relationships at work; clarity and understanding of role and the place a person has within the organisation. The demands of a person’s job; the goals of both department and the organisation as a whole; The communication and speed of changes in the work place, those that will personally affect an individual and the wider changes within the organisation. 5. The principle mechanism for identifying and minimising the factors that contribute to workplace stress is risk assessment; that is, to consider potential sources of stress in a task or working environment when completing a general risk assessment. Such factors may include; restructuring, changes to workload, unachievable deadlines or a lack of training. The 13 Equality Screening Template - GENERIC assessment of foreseeable risk makes it possible to identify appropriate control measures to avoid or minimise harm. 6. Collective or group assessments of workplace stress may be appropriate when a group of staff report problems with the working environment that are adversely impacting on their working environment with regard to workplace stress, if analysis of data such as sickness absence records, staff turnover and informal complaints indicates workplace stress may be a contributing factor or, if requested by a Trade Union staff or H&S representative on behalf of their members because of issues bought to them in confidence. 7. Individual ‘stress assessments’ may be considered under the following circumstances: when a member of staff has reported work place stress as a concern; a manager is aware that a member of staff is experiencing symptoms caused by stress at work; and, when a member of staff returns from a period of sickness where work place stress has been identified as a factor by a statement of fitness to work issued by a GP (the ‘fit’ note). This assessment is in addition to the requirement described in the Sickness Absence Management Policy and Procedure that requires a return to work interview, led by the member of staff’s line manager, after any period of sickness. The assessment will consider all contributing factors and identify any reasonable control measures that should be put in place. 8. All staff have a personal responsibility for their own health and wellbeing whilst at work. Managers have an additional responsibility to manage the workplace, workload and staff to minimise the likelihood of stress occurring and to seek advice and guidance if necessary. The University expects all staff to take these responsibilities seriously and take action promptly when an issue is identified. The University is committed to: As far as is reasonably practicable, maintaining a healthy and safe workplace. Increasing staff awareness and understanding of the factors that influence mental and physical wellbeing including the causes of workplace stress and the methods available to manage and reduce this within the University. Providing training to enable line managers to identify staff who are experiencing, or may be vulnerable to workplace stress; manage workplace stress; identify foreseeable sources of workplace stress and put in place strategies to manage this. Providing personal and professional development training opportunities to all staff and encouraging attendance. Supporting staff experiencing stress in the workplace by: i. Identifying the causes of workplace stress and, working with members of staff or teams, line managers and other colleagues as necessary, to promote employee wellbeing and, as far as reasonably practicable removal any causes of workplace stress. ii. Providing appropriate readily accessible support including; access to counselling, mentoring and coaching; advice from occupational health; training, both in professional skills and work management skills; flexible working in line with the Flexible Employment 14 Equality Screening Template - GENERIC Policy and access to a confidential service to report bullying and harassment and receive support. Governance 9. The Governors of the University have ultimate responsibility for ensuring the University has effective policies and procedures. Operational responsibility is properly delegated to the Executive Board and senior managers in each College and Rectorate. 10. The effectiveness of this Policy and management of wellbeing will be monitored through the University Health and Safety Committee, reporting to the Executive Board at least annually. Responsibilities 11. The most important relationship in minimising and managing work place stress is that between line managers and their staff. Support and advice is available from Human Resources (HR), Health and Safety (H&S) Advisers and the Trade Unions. Below are details of the responsibilities of managers and staff, Human Resources and the Health and Safety Advisers. 12. Managers have the following responsibilities: Ensuring they have the skills and knowledge to promote wellbeing and take steps to effectively reduce and manage workplace stress and identify staff who may be experiencing stress at work at an early stage. To maintain regular informal and formal communication with staff to monitor workloads, working hours and other health and safety arrangements, and to identify early warning signs of staff who may be experiencing stress. To communicate with and involve staff in organisational changes as early as possible and develop an understanding of the impact of change on people at work. To ensure job descriptions are reasonable and identify the skill required to carry out the role. To adhere to the job descriptions of a role and, if significant changes to the role are being considered, to discuss with the member of staff in a reasonable time frame. Ensure workload and workplace stressors are included in risk assessments when workplace stress is a foreseeable risk, identify appropriate control measures to reduce risk as far as is reasonably practicable and manage any residual risks. Ensure all staff understand what is expected of them at work and have the skills and knowledge to carry out their role effectively. This should be re-affirmed during the annual Performance Review and Appraisal (PRA) and the interim PRA update. Managing issues of poor performance in a sensitive, supportive, fair and clear manner, recognising that such situations will be stressful to staff. Ensure a risk assessment is completed when foreseeable changes in workload or working practices have been identified as likely to have an effect on workplace stress to determine any preventive and protective measures necessary, as far as is reasonably practicable, to mitigate the risks identified. Examples of foreseeable risks include re-organisation and relocation, a member of staff leaving or going on maternity leave; a change in process, the introduction of new software or a planned short absence during a critical period. Changes that are 15 Equality Screening Template - GENERIC unforeseeable could include an unexpected absence due to illness or bereavement, in these cases adjustment should be made as soon as is reasonably practicable. Actively challenge and deal with unacceptable behaviours that increase the risks of workplace stress, for example; bullying and harassment; poor timekeeping; poor work performance; failure to follow safe systems of work. Promote employee wellbeing and support University initiatives to advance better ways of working and tackle workplace stress. Seek, and act on advice and guidance from HR and the H&S Adviser to prevent or manage incidents of workplace stress. 13. All staff have the following responsibilities: To inform their line manager, HR or the H&S Adviser know if there may be issues that are adversely affecting wellbeing at work. To raise issues with their line manager that they believe are, or are likely to, unreasonably adversely affect their wellbeing or the wellbeing of their colleagues. Put forward constructive suggestions about how this might be addressed. Ensure they have the skills and knowledge to carry out their role effectively and request training or support if necessary. Co-operate with their line manager, HR or H&S to manage stress at work and be mindful of causing stress to colleagues and others. Treat colleagues with respect and challenge unacceptable behaviour such as bullying or harassment. 14. H&S Advisers have the following responsibilities Supporting managers in the management of work place stress and the completion and implementation of risk assessment including identifying workplace stressors. Providing up-to-date advice on the legal requirements and best practice regarding the management of wellbeing at work and methods for improving and maintaining a healthy workplace. Working with managers and HR to monitor and review the effectiveness of measures to maintain a healthy workplace. To take appropriate action where the wellbeing of staff at work is being adversely affected. To act on information received about individuals or groups experiencing stress at work. Seeking additional advice and guidance when necessary. Consulting in good time with Staff TU Health and Safety Representatives about any changes to the management of stress at work or the introduction of training that affects the health and safety of their members. 15. Human Resources are responsible for the following; Providing up to date guidance for all staff on wellbeing at work and maintaining a healthy workplace, including the support available to staff. 16 Equality Screening Template - GENERIC Providing appropriate training opportunities for staff to support personal and professional development. Monitoring sickness absence to identify potential problems and provide timely support to staff and managers, including referrals to occupational health. Gather data relating to work place stress such as sickness absence records and exit questionnaires and make the data available as appropriate. Assessing the effectiveness of measures to maintain a healthy workplace, both across the University and at a local level. Subject to available resources the provision and promotion of a confidential counselling service accessible by all staff. Providing support to staff and managers to address issues of work related stress. Working with all parties to manage effectively the return to work of staff who have suffered from stress related ill health. Consulting with TU Staff Health and Safety Representatives about any changes to the management of stress at work or the introduction of training that affects the health and safety of their members in good time. Further advice and support is available from: Human Resources Health and Safety Advisers The Diversity Office Trade Union Staff and Health and Safety Representatives UCU GMB UNISON The Occupational Health Service The Employee Assistant Helpline This policy will be reviewed at two yearly intervals 17 Equality Screening Template - GENERIC Human Resources Contacts HR Manager (Benefits, Policy, Recruitment and Rewards) Kate Burrell x6090 CCW HR Business Partner Claudia Otoo x7937/3577 HR Consultant Rachael Horsler x3952 HR Officer Shahnaz Khan x7798 CSM HR Business Partner Claudia Otoo x7937/3577 HR Consultant Carole Gibbons x3948 HR Officer Peter Lane x6087 LCC HR Business Partner Clive Foulkes x3496 HR Consultant Michelle Telesford x3950 HR Officer Martin Wright x6169 LCF HR Business Partner - Clive Foulkes (Interim) x3496 HR Consultant Kam Sokhi x3951 HR Officer Kathryn Jarvis x6215 Academic Development and Services HR Business Partner Andrea Gordon x2973/3493 HR Officer Alison Day x9399 Information Services: HR Consultant Sat Matharu x6086/3945 University Secretary & Registrar Offices, Research, CLTAD, Academic Affairs, Student Services, Widening Participation HR Consultant Anna KingsleyNyinah x7857/3640 18 Equality Screening Template - GENERIC Strategic Development HR Business Partner Andrea Gordon x2973/3493 HR Officer Richard Hunt x6089 Estates, Housing, Retail, Catering, Language Centre, International Centre, Internationalisation, Artscom: HR Consultant Linda Slaymaker x2390/3946 Enterprise, Communications, Development: HR Consultant Anna Kingsley-Nyinah x7857/3640 Human Resources: HR Consultant Sat Matharu x6086/3945 Rector’s Office HR Officer Richard Hunt x6089 Rectors Offices, Central Planning Unit: HR Consultant Anna Kingsley-Nyinah x7857/3640 Finance: HR Consultant Sat Matharu x6086/3945 Health and Safety Advisers CCW CSM LCF LCC High Holborn/ Richbel Place Abigail Dickinson Niall Campbell x 8791 Brian Wade x 7516/3923 Karen Godfrey x 6614 Miriam Cooper x 6103 Managing Sickness Absence Policy Return to work interview 19 Equality Screening Template - GENERIC Appendix 2 - The Stress Risk Assessment Guide Stress risk assessment: A Guide for the Wellbeing Policy Why does a risk assessment for work place stress need to be completed? 1. Risk assessment is a proactive process that should be carried out when changes are being planned or new activities considered. Regulation 3 of the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations (Management Regs) require employers to assess risks to health and safety from hazards at work. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) identifies stress as a workplace hazard with the potential to cause ill health. Employers are therefore required to consider the risk of work related stress when planning changes in the workplace or introducing new processes and activities. When should an assessment of workplace stress be completed? 2. Managers are required to carry out a suitable and sufficient risk assessment of workplace activities at various times: When activities are planned. Before the introduction of planned changes. If there are changes that may affect health and safety. If any complaint has been made or illness/accident occurs. If there has been a change in legislation that impacts on the work activity. If staff have raised the issue of work related stress with their line manager or through a different route such as their Trade Union representative. What does ‘suitable and sufficient’ mean? 3. Any risk assessment, including an assessment of work related stress, must be suitable and sufficient to fulfil the requirements of the Management Regs. To be suitable and sufficient a risk assessment must take into account all the factors involved, reflect the actual situation (i.e. be based in reality and not what should be happening) and make recommendations that will address the risks identified. They must also be completed by a competent person. As a manager you should be able to assess the likelihood and impact of workplace stress in most instances however, if you are concerned about your competency to complete an assessment, which may be the case if it is particularly complex, then you should contact your HR Consultant or H&S Adviser for advice. 4. The effort and resource put into a risk assessment should be proportionate to the degree of change or the level of complexity of the task/activity being assessed. A small change should not require pages and pages of documentation, however a complex change or activity will require time and effort to complete and document a risk assessment. 5. The HSE have developed the following checklist to use when deciding if your stress risk assessment is suitable and sufficient. The HSE consider that if you can say yes to all of the points on the checklist any stress risk assessment is likely to be suitable and sufficient 20 Equality Screening Template - GENERIC HSE checklist for a suitable and sufficient risk assessment of workplace stress Do you include all the steps in the risk assessment process? Do you focus on prevention and organisational level solutions? Do you include provision for dealing with other issues, e.g. individual issues? Do you ensure commitment from all parties (senior management, employees and their representatives)? Do you have arrangements to identify those aspects of the work, organisation or environment that are known to be risk factors for work related stress? Does your approach highlight the extent and nature of the gap, if any, between the current situation, and what is seen as good practice, e.g. ‘the states to be achieved’ in the Management Standards (see appendix 1), for each of the identified stress risk areas? Do you involve the workforce: o By asking about their views regarding good and bad features of workplace conditions? o By seeking their suggestions, advice and comments on potential solutions to problems (e.g. improvements to working conditions, changes in the way work is organised, etc)? o By ensuring that people are empowered to contribute and feel that their views are listened to and acted on? o By communicating outcomes (e.g. action plans)? Do you seek to develop and adopt solutions that are 'reasonably practicable'? Do you provide documentation to show what you have done at each stage of the process and that you are implementing the recommended actions? How do I carry out and the document a risk assessment? 6. Because experiences of stress are to a certain extent subjective, identifying potential causes of stress and the risk they represent is not as straightforward as identifying the risks involved in injury from a particular machine or a manual handling task. To help identify changes in role, workplace or working environment that could foreseeably affect workplace stress it is helpful to refer to the HSE Management Standards (see appendix 1 for details). 7. The HSE has identified six key areas of work design that, if properly managed, are associated with good health and wellbeing, increased productivity and decreased sickness absence. Changes in the workplace that affect any of these six ’Management Standards’ should be considered to determine if any changes are likely to have an adverse effect and how any adverse affects may be managed and minimised. 8. Risk assessments must be documented and the results communicated to all affected parties. For complex assessments the University risk assessment form can be used and is available to download from the H&S web pages . However for simple changes such as a small change to working hours, an agreement for flexible working or a small change to job role the PRA process and applications for flexible working can be used to document the risk assessment 21 Equality Screening Template - GENERIC process and outcomes. For minor changes it may be sufficient to refer to the notes of 1:1 meetings or to document changes and agreement in an email. Below is a flow diagram illustrating the risk assessment process. 9. Even small changes such as a change in someone's hours, agreement for flexible working, minor changes in responsibility, task, reporting line etc. still need to be considered against the six management standards and the assessment must be documented in some way. 22 Equality Screening Template - GENERIC Changes that may affect work place stress for an individual or group Identify the foreseeable hazards related to workplace stress for all employees. Alert other departments if changes will affect them as well. This usually only applies if significant change is planned Assess the risks of work related stress. Indentify control measures. Refer to the management Standards ‘States to be achieved’ Discuss with employees affected and if necessary with Trade Unions Representatives. Document findings Implement control measures Changes that may affect workplace stress include; changes to hours, location, line management, duties, responsibilities, software and processes. If moderate or significant control measures will be necessary. If the risk of work related stress is small or insignificant then it may not be necessary to introduce control measures but they should always be considered There are several ways to document the findings of a risk assessment: The University risk assessment form which should be used for significant and/or complex changes and for any assessment that is not documented in one of the following alternative ways; As part of the PRA process, either the annual Appraisal or six month review. A flexible working agreement letter. The notes of 1:1 meetings when minor changes to working arrangements are discussed and agreed An email detailing proposed changes and agreed actions, or acknowledgement that no additional action is necessary between the line manager and all affected by changes. Decide on a review date and process. It is important to give some consideration about how changes can be measured and whether additional data needs to be measured for a period. 23 Equality Screening Template - GENERIC Appendix 1 The HSE Management Standards Demands Control Support Relationships Role Change Issues such as workload, work patterns and the work environment How much say a person has in their work The encouragement, sponsorship and resource provided by the organisation, line management and colleagues Promoting positive working to avoid conflict and dealing with unacceptable behaviour Whether people understand their role within the organisation and whether the organisation ensures they do not have conflicting roles. How organisational change (large or small) is managed and communicated in the organisation. Demands Includes issues like workload, work patterns and the work environment. The Standard is that: Employees indicate they are able to cope with the demands of their jobs; and Systems are in place locally to respond to any individual concerns States to be achieved to fulfil the Standard: The organisation provides employees with adequate and achievable demands in relation to the agreed hours of work; People’s skills are matched to the job demands; Jobs are designed to be within the capabilities of employees; and Employees concerns’ about their work environment are addressed. Control How much say a person has in the way they do their work The Standard is that: Employees indicate that they are able to have a say in the way they do their work; and Systems are in place locally to respond to individual concerns. States to be achieved to fulfil the Standard: Where possible employees have control over the pace of their work; Employees are encouraged to use their skills and initiative to do their work; Where possible employees are encouraged to develop new skills to help them undertake new and challenging pieces of work; The organisation encourages employees to develop their skills; Employees have a say over when breaks can be taken; and Employees are consulted over their work patterns. 24 Equality Screening Template - GENERIC Support Includes the encouragement, sponsorship and resources provided by the organisation, line management and colleagues. The Standard is that: Employees indicate that they receive adequate information and support from colleagues and superiors; and Systems are in place locally to respond to individual concerns. States to be achieved to fulfil the Standard: The organisation has policies and procedures to adequately support employees; Systems are in place to enable and encourage managers to support their staff; Systems are in place to enable and encourage employees to support their colleagues; Employees know what support is available and how and when to access it; Employees know how to access the required resources to do their job; and Employees receive regular and constructive feedback. Relationships Includes promoting positive working to avoid conflict and dealing with unacceptable behaviour. The Standard is that: Employees indicate that they are not subject to unacceptable behaviours, e.g. bullying at work; and Systems are in place locally to respond to any individual concerns. States to be achieved to fulfil this Standard: The organisation promotes positive behaviours at work to avoid conflict and ensure fairness; Employees share information relevant to their work; The organisation has agreed policies and procedures to prevent or resolve unacceptable behaviour; Systems are in place to enable and encourage managers to deal with unacceptable behaviour; and Systems are in place to encourage staff to enable and encourage employees to report unacceptable behaviour. Role Whether people understand their role within the organisation and whether the organisation ensures that the person does not have conflicting roles. The Standard is that: Employees indicate they understand their role and responsibilities; and Systems are in place locally to respond to any individual concerns. States to be achieved to fulfil this Standard: The organisation ensures that, as far as possible, the different requirements it places on employees are compatible; 25 Equality Screening Template - GENERIC The organisation provides information to enable employees to understand their role and responsibilities; The organisation ensures that, as far as possible, the requirements it places upon employees are clear; and Systems are in place to enable employees to raise concerns about any uncertainties or conflicts they have in their role and responsibilities. Change How organisational change (large or small) is managed and communicated in the organisation. The Standard is that: Employees indicate that the organisation engages them frequently when undergoing an organisational change; and Systems are in place locally to respond to any individual concerns. States to be achieved to fulfil this Standard The organisation provides employees with timely information to enable them to understand the reasons for proposed changes; The organisation ensures adequate employee consultation on changes and provides opportunities for employee consultation on changes and provides opportunities for employees to influence proposals; Employees are aware of the probable impact of any changes to their jobs. If necessary, employees are given training to support any changes in their jobs; Employees are aware of timetables for changes; and Employees have access to relevant support during changes. 26 Equality Screening Template - GENERIC Part Two APPENDIX 3 - Outcomes of consultations with H&S Committee University Health and Safety Committee Minutes Minutes of the meeting held on 31 May 2012 at 2pm, in room 902(Boardroom), 9th Floor, 272 High Holborn London WC1. 1. MEMBERSHIP AND ANNOUNCEMENTS Present Nick Rogers Miriam Cooper Derek Paxman Eleanor Pirie Gavin Jenkins Graham Simner Jane Rapley Jonathan Dixon Steve Dixon David Bartlett Nick Jung Sheila Suso-Runge Director of HR (Chair) University Health and Safety Administrator (Clerk) Head of Facilities Head of Health and Safety Chair of LCF Health and Safety Committee Director of Estates CSM Head of College, Chair of CSM Health and Safety Committee Facilities Contracts Manager Representing Chair of CCW Health and Safety Committee GMB Health and Safety Staff Representative UCU Health and Safety Staff Representative, LCC Representing Karen Riley for Unison Apologies Barry Lambert Karen Riley Kyran Joughin Rick Troop Sainey Njie Stephen Marshall GMB Branch Secretary Unison Branch Secretary UCU Co-Chair Health and Safety Representative, Housing Services Unison Health and Safety Staff Representative University Secretary and Registrar 2. AGREED: MINUTES OF 23 February 2012 That the minutes of the meeting held on 23 February 2012 be signed as a true and correct record. NOTED 5. HEALTH AND SAFETY REPORT The Head of Health and Safety presented her report to the Committee. Eleanor Pirie, Head of Health and Safety, highlighted the issue of health surveillance as set out in her report. She stated that Health Surveillance should be identified and either carried out, or planned for all staff who require regular health surveillance checks by 22nd June 2012. A briefing note was circulated in April to the H&S Advisers and Technical Managers and in May to Artscom Managers outlining the activities likely to result in staff requiring health surveillance. The roles identified as requiring health surveillance would be used to identify new starters who would require baseline and continuing health surveillance. She stated that other Colleges/Universities were doing the same. EP informed the Committee that the development of the H&S Inspection regime and Scorecard had been delayed due to the HSE visit and would be picked up over the 27 Equality Screening Template - GENERIC Summer. EP also informed the Committee that the Extended Opening Hours standard was now a working document and provided clarity on this issue. She also stated that the Working at Height standard was in draft form and available for consultation via the H&S part of the UAL website. EP asked for comments by 29th June 2012. EP also highlighted that the Management of Asbestos and Control of Contractors standards were being revised to reflect new control methods and would be available for comment by 29 th June 2012. EP stated that both of these standards would incorporate the Estates systems already in place, e.g. Permits to Work. EP presented the draft Wellbeing Policy and invited members of the Committee to make any comments or suggestions by 15th June 2012. EP explained that the old Harassment Contact Network was being re-launched as the ‘Staff Support Network providing a first point of contact for employees affected by perceived bullying or harassment at work. PPC will provide training and support for volunteers. EP drew the Committee’s attention to the fact that the role of the volunteer would not be advisory / counselling / mentoring, but rather a signposting role. The contact should be limited to a single meeting with the possible follow up of accompanying a member of staff to a meeting with the other party or assisting in writing a letter to the other party. EP also stated that the occupational health provider Health Management was able to directly refer staff to PPC for counselling after a consultation meeting with an employee and an occupational health physician. EP informed the Committee that the H&S training programme for 2012-13 was being developed. EP would be bringing this to Colleges attention in the next few weeks. Elearning ladder training was now available on Blackboard and the ladder tagging system was being rolled out. NJ welcomed the Wellbeing Policy document and commented that he would like to see mandatory training for Managers on wellbeing. It was raised that a module on this was included as part of the Key Staff Management Skills. Sheila Suso-Runge asked that ‘Diversity Office’ be added to Point 11 on page 4 of the Wellbeing Policy so that it is consistent with the list on page 6. EP agreed to make this addition/amendment. DB asked whether H&S received many reports of accidents as a result of working at height. EP stated that H&S had received very few. AGREED: That EP will add ‘Diversity Office’ to Point 11 on page 4 of the Wellbeing Policy so that it is consistent with the list on page 6. The meeting concluded at 3.00pm Signed as a true and correct record Date 28 Equality Screening Template - GENERIC APPENDIX 4 UAL Wellbeing Events November 2012: Preventing, Overcoming and Releasing Stress Wellbeing Week - November 2012 Theme: Preventing, Overcoming & Releasing Stress 11 activities took place at 6 different sites 122 staff-members booked onto an activity 104 staff-members attended an activity 14 staff-members attended more than 1 activity Where were they from? LCF Other VC 3% 3% 5% CCW 16% Who attended? Activities: • • • • • • • • • • • Acupressure Massages Coaching Drumming Workshop Good Posture & Workstation Advice Health MOTs Indian Head Massages Managing Personal Finance Mental Health MOTs Sleep and Stress Workshop Preventing Back Pain & RSI Workshop Success through Change Workshop 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 CSM 11% LCC 24% ADS 15% SD 23% What did they attend? Mental Health MOT Acupressure Massage Health MOT Indian Head Massage Where did the activities take place? • Elephant & Castle • High Holborn • Kings Cross • Lime Grove • Merton Hall Road • Millbank Success through Change Workshop Sleep and Stress Workshop Preventing Back Pain & RSI Workshop Managing your Personal Finance Workshop Drumming Workshop 0 5 10 15 20 25 29 Equality Screening Template - GENERIC What did staff think? • 93% of attendees would recommend the wellbeing activity to a colleague • 86% of attendees felt they achieved their personal objectives How confident did staff feel about the subject(s) covered in the activity they attended? After the session Before the session 0 “The massage was wonderful and felt like a real treat – this kind of thing on a regular basis would really lift staff morale!!” Onsite Acupressure Massage “I thought this was a great session. The session was succinct yet satisfying and still allowed for interaction within the group” Success through Change Workshop “This workshop was totally awesome, I loved it, I was smiling from ear to ear when I left and was on a natural high for hours afterwards” Drumming Workshop 1 2 3 4 0 = Not at all confident 4 = Very confident Preparing for Wellbeing Week 2013 • 48% of staff who attended would like to see more on Mental Health Awareness • 68% of staff would like to see more on Nutrition and Exercise • 32% of staff would like something different 30 Equality Screening Template - GENERIC