ELLs with Disabilities: What the Literature Has to Say

advertisement
ELLs with Disabilities:
What the Literature Has to
Say
Adapted presentation by
Soyoung Park
Stanford Graduate School of Education
ELL SCASS Meeting June 24, 2014
1
Think of 2 or 3 important policy
and/or practice related questions
about ELLs with disabilities that
you would like to have answers
to (if they exist).
Please jot these questions down
2
Agenda
Part One:
• Who are English language learners with disabilities?
• Assessment and Identification Concerns
• Small Group Discussion
Part Two:
• Issues of Representation
• Instruction and Interventions
• Small Group Discussion
Part Three:
• Discussion: Lingering Questions
3
English Language Learners with Special Needs
Overview of the Literature
(77 articles)
Overview and
Background
(6 articles)
Miscellaneous
(7 articles)
Assessment and
Identification
(22 articles)
Instruction and
Intervention
(28 articles)
Representation
(18 articles)
4
Who are ELLs with
Disabilities?
• Students who are eligible for both special education services
and English language development/bilingual programs
• 2009-2010 School Year:
• 518,088 students with disabilities classified as LEP (8.5%)
• CA highest percentage of all ELLs identified as having
disabilities (2%)
• More than half of all states report providing SpEd services to
less than 0.5% of ELLs
(Office of Special Education Programs Data Accountability Center, 2013)
5
Who are ELLs with
Disabilities?
• In 2009-2010, states reported the following languages most
commonly spoken by ELLs with disabilities:
Arabic (29 states)
Chinese (32 states)
Hmong (7 states)
Russian (7 states)
Somali (10 states)
Spanish (32 states)
Vietnamese (31 states)
(2009-2010 Consolidated State Performance Reports)
6
Who are ELLs with
Disabilities?
• Most common disability categories for ELLs:
•
•
•
•
Specific learning disabilities (SLD)
Speech/language impairments (SLI)
Intellectual disabilities (ID; formerly MR)
Emotional/behavioral disorders (EBD; formerly ED)
• 2006 OCR study: 88% of students with disabilities in need
of ELD/bilingual instruction received it
• Many children only get one or the other when need both
• Many children get both when only need one or the other
7
Assessment and Identification
• Challenge: disabilities v. language proficiency issues
• What level of proficiency should ELLs acquire before referred
for SpEd evaluation?
• Educators tend to jump to LD diagnosis
• Lack of information on what educators need to understand
about second language acquisition
• Importance of considering instruction and interventions
students already received (usu. in RtI model)
8
Assessment and Identification
Common characteristics in language development of
ELLs and students with language related disabilities
Pronunciation
Phonological omissions, substitutes,
and/or additions
Syntax
Confusions with negation, word
order, and mood; grammatical errors
Semantics
Difficulty with forms of figurative
language like proverbs, metaphors,
and similes
Discourse/Pragmatics
Poor comprehension, difficulty
following directions, hard time
completing tasks
(Case & Taylor, 2005; Chu & Flores, 2011)
9
Assessment and Identification
• Problems with assessments
• Evaluations for SpEd eligibility all in English
• No adequate measures to determine when ELLs ready to be
assessed in English
•
•
•
•
Evaluations tend to be linguistically complex
Referral process is subjective and biased
RtI interventions rarely culturally relevant
One study finding: Psychological evaluation reports for ELLs
tend to ignore state and professional guidelines on how to
conduct nondiscriminatory assessments (Figueroa & Newsome, 2006)
10
Assessment and Identification
• Recommended assessment techniques
Alternative and
Supplementary Assessments
Approaches to Assessment
Multiple step process (RtI)
Collaborative teams
Assess in dominant language
Trained interpreters
Assess cultural responsiveness
of school
Analytic teaching
Curriculum-based assessment
Language sampling
Narrative analysis
Portfolio assessments
11
Discussion Questions
• What stood out to you in the information presented about
who ELLs with disabilities are?
• What stood out to you about issues related to assessment
and identification of ELLs with disabilities?
• Is there anything else you would like to know more about
regarding demographics of ELLs with disabilities or issues
of assessment/identification?
• What are common problems educators in your district face
with regards to assessment/identification? What
initiatives, if any, have been taken to address these
problems?
12
Representation
• Long history of overrepresentation of students with “low
status” backgrounds in SpEd
• Blacks, Latinos and Native Americans tend to be
overrepresented compared with whites and all students
• Asians tend to be underrepresented, with the exception of
some Southeast Asian groups
• English language learners tend to be disproportionately
labeled LD and SLI
13
Representation
At national level, ELLs not overrepresented in SpEd
General Student Population
English Language Learners
9%
13%
In Special
Education
In Special
Education
Not in Special
Education
Not in Special
Education
87%
91%
(Zehler et al, 2003)
14
Representation
Other studies focusing on single states with high ELL populations:
State
Relative risk ratio of
being in SpEd
% Districts with
overrepresentation
Arizona
0.77 in 1999
32% in 1999
(Sullivan, 2011)
1.9 in 2006
42% in 2006
Texas
2.46 in 2004
94% in 2004
(Linn & Hemmer, 2011)
1.35 in 2010
52% in 2010
15
Representation
• Consequences of disproportionate representation (Artiles et al,
2010):
• Over 1/3 of students with LD drop out of school
• Culturally and linguistically diverse students with LD less
likely to go to college than white students with LD
• Estimated range of youth with disabilities in detention, private
& public correctional facilities: 30-70%
• Disproportionate representation signals larger systemic
issues and the need for more culturally responsive practice
in schools
16
Instruction and Interventions
• Recommendations for Classroom:
• Culturally responsive pedagogy
• Primary language support/instruction
• Actively involve students’ parents in learning
• Regular dialogue between teachers and students
• Oral language development
• Collaborative learning tasks
• Focus on developing higher order cognitive skills
17
Instruction and Interventions
Instructional practices and interventions shown to have
positive outcomes for ELLs with disabilities
Classroom instruction:
Interventions:
• Instructional conversations
• Sheltered content instruction
• Peer assisted learning strategies
(PALS)
• Differentiated instruction using
Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences
• Fostering self-monitoring skills
• The Olé Project
• Phonological awareness
interventions
• Embedded in writing and
vocabulary lessons
• Combined w/ token
economy
• Intensive, small group reading
interventions
18
Instruction and Interventions
• Teacher preparation
• Lack of preparation to serve ELLs with special needs
• Rodriguez (2005): What do bilingual special education
practitioners think is most needed in teacher prep programs?
•
•
•
•
•
•
100 practitioners
85% proficiency in two languages
82% knowledge of assessments
79% planning and delivery of instruction
71% cultural competence
67% promoting and maintaining professionalism
19
Discussion Questions
• What stood out to you in the information presented about the
representation of ELLs in special education?
• What stood out to you in the information presented about
instruction and interventions for ELLs with disabilities?
• Are there any other issues related to representation or
instruction and interventions that you would like to know more
about?
• What are common problems educators in your state/district face
with regards to these topic? What initiatives, if any, have been
taken to address these problems?
20
Whole Group Share
What are some additional questions that you have?
21
References
Artiles, A. J. (2004). The End of Innocence: Historiography and Representation in the Discursive Practice of
LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(6), 550–555.
Artiles, A. J. (2011). Toward an Interdisciplinary Understanding of Educational Equity and Difference: The
Case of the Racialization of Ability. Educational Researcher, 40(9), 431–445.
Artiles, A. J., & Bal, A. (2008). The Next Generation of Disproportionality Research: Toward a Comparative
Model in the Study of Equity in Ability Differences. The Journal of Special Education, 42(1), 4–14.
Artiles, A. J., & Trent, S. C. (1994). Overrepresentation of Minority Students in Special Education: A
Continuing Debate. The Journal of Special Education, 27(4), 410–437.
Artiles, A. (2003). Identity : Paradoxes and Dilemmas in Views of Culture and Space, 73(2), 164–203.
Artiles, A., & Harry, B. (2006). Addressing Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Student Overrepresentation in
Special Education: Guidelines for Parents. National Center for Culturally Responsive Educational Systems
(NCCRESt).
Artiles, A. J., Harry, B., Reschly, D. J., & Chinn, P. C. (2002). Over-Identification of Students of Color in
Special Education: A Critical Overview. Multicultural Perspectives, 4(1), 3–10.
Artiles, A. J., & Klingner, J. K. (2006). Forging a Knowledge Base on English Language Learners with Special
Needs: Theoretical, Population, and Technical Issues. Teachers College Record, 108(11), 2187–2194.
Artiles, A. J., Ortiz, A. A., & . (2002). English language learners with special education needs.
Artiles, A. J., Rueda, R., Salazar, J. J., & Higareda, I. (2005). Within-Group Diversity in Minority
Disproportionate Representation: English Language Learners in Urban School Districts. Exceptional Children,
71(3), 283–300.
Artiles, A., Kozleski, E., Trent, S., Osher, D., & Ortiz, A. (2010). Justifying and explaining disproportionality,
1968-2008: A critique of underlying views of culture. Exceptional Children, 76(3), 279–299.
Boscardin, M. L., Ph, D., Brown-chidsey, R., Guess, C., Ed, D., Durkin, P., … Vargas, E. L. (2001). Educating
Students with Disabilities from Diverse Backgrounds. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 14(2).
Brown, J. E., & Doolittle, J. (2004). Framework for Response to Intervention With English Language Learners.
Case, R. E., & Taylor, S. S. (2005). Difference or Learning Language Disability? Answers from a linguistic
perspective, 78(3), 127–130.
22
References (Cont.)
Chu, S., & Flores, S. (2011). Assessment of English Language Learners with Learning Disabilities. The Clearing
House, 84(6), 244.
Cuevas, G. J., & Beech, M. C. (1983). A second-language aproach to mathematics skills: Applications for
limited-English proficient students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6(4), 489–495.
Echevarria, J. (1995). Interactive reading instruction : A comparison of proximal and distal effects of
instructional conversations. Exceptional Children, 61(6), 536–552.
Echevarria, J., & Graves, A. (1999). Sheltered Content Instruction: Teaching English-Language Learners with
Diverse Abilities.
Echevarria, J., & McDonough, R. (1995). An Alternative Reading Approach: Instructional Conversations in a
Bilingual Special Education Setting. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 10(2), 108–119.
Figueroa, R. A., & Newsome, P. (2006). The Diagnosis of LD in English Learners: Is It Nondiscriminatory?
Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(3), 206–214.
Ford, D. Y. (2012). Culturally Different Students in Special Education Looking Backward to Move Forward.
Exceptional Children, 78(4), 391–405.
Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2005). Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies for English Language Learners With
Learning Disabilities, 71(3).
Garcia, M. (2012). Strategies to Help English Language Learners Succeed in the Least Restrictive Environment
Education.
Garcia, S. B., Mendez Perez, a., & Ortiz, a. a. (2000). Mexican American Mothers’ Beliefs About Disabilities:
Implications for Early Childhood Intervention. Remedial and Special Education, 21(2), 90–120.
Garcia, S. B., & Ortiz, A. A. (1988). Preventing Inappropriate Referrals of Language Minority Students to
Special Education. NCBE New Focus, 5.
García, S. B., & Ortiz, A. a. (2006). Preventing Disproportionate Representation: Culturally and Linguistically
Responsive Prereferral Interventions. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(4), 64–68.
Garcia, S. B., & Tyler, B. J. (2010). Meeting the Needs of English Language Learners With Learning
Disabilities in the General Curriculum. Theory into Practice, 49(2), 113–120.
23
References (Cont.)
Gersten, R., & Geva, E. (2003). Teaching reading to early language learners. Educational Leadership, 44–49.
Guarino, C. M., Buddin, R., Pham, C., & Cho, M. (2009). Demographic Factors Associated With the Early
Identification of Children With Special Needs. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 30(3), 162–175.
Haager, D. (2007). Promises and Cautions regarding using Response to Intervention with English Language
Learners. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30(3), 213–218. doi:10.2307/30035565
Haager, D., & Windmueller, M. P. (2001). Early Reading Intervention for English Language Learners At-Risk
for Learning Disabilities: Student and Teacher Outcomes in an Urban School. Learning Disability Quarterly,
24(4), 235–250.
Hart, J. E. (2009). Strategies for Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students With Special Needs. Preventing
School Failure, 53(3), 197–208.
Healy, K., Vanderwood, M., & Edelston, D. (2005). Early literacy interventions for English language learners:
Support for an RTI Model. The California School Psychologist, 10, 55–63.
Hoover, J. J., & Patton, J. R. (2005). Differentiating Curriculum and Instruction for English-Language
Learners With Special Needs. Intervention in School and Clinic, 40(4), 231–235.
Huang, J., Clarke, K., Milczarski, E., & Raby, C. (2011). the Assessment of English Language Learners With
Learning Disabilities: Issues, Concerns, and Implications. Education, 131(4), 732–739.
Keller-allen, C. (2006). English language learners with disabilities: Identification and other state policies and issues.
Klingner, J., & Artiles, A. J. (2006). Struggling to Learn to Read : Emergent Scholarship on Linguistic
Differences and Learning Disabilities, 39(5), 386–389.
Klingner, J., Hoover, J., & Baca, L. (2008). Why Do English Language Learners Struggle with Reading?:
Distinguishing Language Acquisition from Learning Disabilities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Klingner, J. K., & Artiles, A. J. (2003). When should bilingual students be in special education? Educational
Leadership, 66–71.
Klingner, J. K., Artiles, A. J., & Barletta, L. M. (2006). Struggle With Reading : Language Acquisition or LD ?,
39(2), 108–128.
24
References (Cont.)
Klingner, J. K., Artiles, A. J., Kozleski, E., Harry, B., Zion, S., Tate, W., … Riley, D. (2005). Addressing the
disproportionate representation of culturally and linguistically diverse students in special education through
culturally responsive educational systems, 1–43.
Klingner, J. K., Artiles, A. J., Kozleski, E., Harry, B., Zion, S., Tate, W., … Riley, D. (2005). Addressing the
Disproportionate Representation of Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students in Special Education
through Culturally Responsive Educational Systems. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13, 43.
Leafstedt, J. M., Richards, C. R., & Gerber, M. M. (2004). Effectiveness of Explicit Phonological-Awareness
Instruction for At-Risk English Learners. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 19(4), 252–261.
Linan-Thompson, S., Vaughn, S., Prater, K., & Cirino, P. T. (2006). The Response to Intervention of English
Language Learners at Risk for Reading Problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(5), 390–398.
Linn, D., & Hemmer, L. (2011). English Language Learner Disproportionality in Special Education :
Implications for the Scholar- ‐ Practitioner, 1(1), 70–80.
Liu, K. K., Watkins, E., Pompa, D., McLeod, P., & Elliott, J. (2013). Following Patxi’s Lead: A ChildCentered Journey of Learning and Language. Impact.
Liu, Y.-J., Ortiz, a. a., Wilkinson, C. Y., Robertson, P., & Kushner, M. I. (2008). From Early Childhood
Special Education to Special Education Resource Rooms: Identification, Assessment, and Eligibility
Determinations for English Language Learners With Reading-Related Disabilities. Assessment for Effective
Intervention, 33(3), 177–187.
Mccardle, P., & Mele-mccarthy, J. (2005). English Language Learners and Learning Disabilities : Research
Agenda and Implications for Practice, 20(1), 68–78.
Mccardle, P., Mele-mccarthy, J., Cutting, L., Leos, K., & Emilio, T. D. (2005). Learning Disabilities in English
Language Learners : Identifying the Issues, 20(1), 1–5.
McMaster, K. L., Kung, S.-H., Han, I., & Cao, M. (2008). Peer-assisted learning strategies: A “Tier 1”
approach to promoting English learners’ response to intervention . Exceptional Children, 74(2), 194–214.
Mueller, T. G., George, H. S., & Elizabeth, J. (2004). The Individuals With Disabilities Education Act and
California ’ s ... Bilingual Research Journal, 28(2), 231–293.
NEA. (2007). Special Education and English Language Learners. Focus on Hispanics, (December).
25
References (Cont.)
Ortiz, A. A. (1997). Learning Disabilities Occurring Concomitantly with Linguistic Differences. Journal of
Learning Disabilities, 30(3), 321–332.
Ortiz, A. A., Wilkinson, C. Y., Robertson-Courtney, P., & Kushner, M. I. (2006). Considerations in
Implementing Intervention Assistance Teams to Support English Language Learners. Remedial and Special
Education, 27(1), 53–63.
Ortiz, A. (2001). English language learners with special needs: Effective instructional strategies. ERIC Digest,
1–8.
Ortiz, A. A., Robertson, P. M., Wilkinson, C. Y., Liu, Y.-J., McGhee, B. D., & Kushner, M. I. (2011). The Role
of Bilingual Education Teachers in Preventing Inappropriate Referrals of ELLs to Special Education:
Implications for Response to Intervention. Bilingual Research Journal, 34(3), 316–333.
Paneque, O. M., & Barbetta, P. M. (2006). A Study of Teacher Efficacy of Special Education Teachers of
English Language Learners With Disabilities. Bilingual Research Journal, 30(1), 171–193.
Pugh, K. R., Sandak, R., Frost, S. J., Moore, D., & Mencl, W. E. (2005). Examining Reading Development
and Reading Disability in English Language Learners: Potential Contributions from Functional
Neuroimaging. Learning Disabilities Research Practice, 20(1), 24–30.
Richards, H. V., Artiles, A. J., Klingner, J., & Brown, A. (2005). Equity in Special Education Placement : A School
Self-Assessment Guide for Culturally Responsive Practice (pp. 1–19).
Rinaldi, C., & Samson, J. F. (2008). English language learners and Response to Intervention: Referral
considerations. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40, 6–14.
Rodriguez, D. (2005). A Conceptual Framework of Bilingual Special Education Teacher Programs, 1960–
1969.
Rueda, R., & Ragusa, G. (2010). English Language Learners with Special Needs, 701–707.
Rueda, R., & Windmueller, M. P. (2006). English Language Learners, LD, and Overrepresentation: A
Multiple-Level Analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(2), 99–107.
Ruiz, N. T. (1999). Effective literacy instruction for Latino students receiving special education services: A
review of classroom research. Bilingual Review, 24(1/2), 161–174.
26
References (Cont.)
Ruiz, N. T., Vargas, E., & Beltran, A. (2002). Becoming a Reader and Writer in a Bilingual Special Education
Classroom. Language Arts, 79(4), 297–309.
Shifrer, D., Muller, C., & Callahan, R. (2011). Disproportionality and learning disabilities: parsing apart race,
socioeconomic status, and language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(3), 246–57.
Shore, J. R., & Sabatini, J. (2009). English language learners with reading disabilities: A review of the literature
and the foundation for a research agenda, (May).
Spinelli, C. G. (2008). Addressing the Issue of Cultural and Linguistic Diversity and Assessment: Informal
Evaluation Measures for English Language Learners. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 24(1), 101–118.
Sullivan, A. L., & Artiles, A. J. (2011). Theorizing Racial Inequity in Special Education: Applying Structural
Inequity Theory to Disproportionality. Urban Education, 46(6), 1526–1552.
Swanson, H. L., Leilani, S., & Gerber, M. (2004). Do Phonological and Executive Processes in English
Learners at Risk for Reading Disabilities in Grade 1 Predict Performance in Grade 2?, 19(4), 225–238.
Valenzuela, J. S. De, Copeland, S. R., Qi, C. H., & Park, M. (2006). Examining educational equity: Revisiting
the disproportionate representation of minority students in special education. Exceptional Children, 72(4), 425–
441.
Vaughn, S., Mathes, P. G., Linan-Thompson, S., & Francis, D. J. (2005). Teaching English Language Learners
At Risk for Reading Disabilities to Read : Putting Research into Practice. Learning Disabilities Research &
Practice, 20(1), 58–67.
Wagner, R. K., Francis, D. J., & Morris, R. D. (2005). Identifying English Language Learners with Learning
Disabilities : Key Challenges and Possible Approaches. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20(1), 6–15.
Wilkinson, C. Y., Ortiz, A. A., Robertson, P. M., & Kushner, M. I. (2006). English Language Learners With
Reading-Related LD: Linking Data From Multiple Sources to Make Eligibility Determinations. Journal of
Learning Disabilities, 39(2), 129–141.
Xu, Y., & Drame, E. (2007). Culturally Appropriate Context: Unlocking the Potential of Response to
Intervention for English Language Learners. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35(4), 305–311.
Zehler, A. M., Fleischman, H. L., Hopstock, P. J., Stephenson, T. G., Pendzick, M. L., & Sapru, S. (n.d.).
Policy Report: Summary of Findings Related to LEP and SpEd-LEP Students.
27
Download