Resolution on Budget Committees October 18, 1995 ...................................................2
Resolution on Budget Committees November 15, 1995 ...............................................3
Resolution on Budget Committees December 6, 1995 .................................................4
Resolution on Budget Committees January 10, 1996 ...................................................5
Resolution Rejecting the Fiscal Proposals of the Administration and Requesting Plans
and Policies which Will Grow Campus Enrollments ......................................................7
Resolution Concerning Advocacy for Cross-Campus Issues in the Next Biennium Budget
...................................................................................................................................8
Resolution on Advance Loans ......................................................................................9
Resolution in Support of Fiscal Responsibility (from the floor by Patsy Fujimoto) ....... 10
Resolution on the Restoration of Restricted Funds .................................................... 11
Presentation by Chancellor Peter Englert on Budget .................................................. 12
Resolution on Missions Clarification and Budget Process ........................................... 14
Resolution on Research Training and Revolving Funds (RTRF) .................................... 15
Resolution on Legislative Budget ............................................................................... 16
Resolution on Retrenchment..................................................................................... 17
Motion to Pursue a Budget Task Force and Report back to the Senate on November 18
................................................................................................................................. 18
Resolution on UHM Financial Assistance ................................................................... 19
Resolution to Establish a Task Force on the Budget ................................................... 20
Resolution on the Budget-Prioritization Workgroup .................................................. 22
Resolution on Fiscal Responsibility, Best Practice, and Unilateral Impositions ............ 25
Approved Budget: 2011-2012 .................................................................................... 27
Resolution on Budget Committees October 18, 1995
Informational Item
No Link or Resolution found at this time.
Resolution on Budget Committees November 15, 1995
Deferred to SEC
No Link or Resolution found at this time.
Resolution on Budget Committees December 6, 1995
Deferred (report distributed)
No Link or Resolution found at this time.
Resolution on Budget Committees January 10, 1996
Passed unanimously
“WHEREAS Governor Cayetano has imposed on the University of Hawaii a reduction
in the systemwide budget of $43 million for fiscal years 1996/1997
WHEREAS President Mortimer has acknowledged problems at the school and
college level with the implementation of the cuts mandated by the university
administration
WHEREAS the President recommends improved communication between his
administration, the deans and directors, and the faculty concerning UHM's response
to the cuts
WHEREAS UHM faculty, through their senate representatives, have expressed
their willingness and desire to provide increased collaboration on budgetary
matters at the school and college level
WHEREAS deans and directors have realized the need for timely discussion of
budgetary policy and are encouraged to seek faculty input and participation in the
decision-making process
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that each college, school, or organized research unit
with a budget over $1 million be urged to ensure that there is an elected faculty
committee with responsibilities to review and provide advice on budgetary policy
and expenditures.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that these committees' responsibilities include
working together with the deans and directors to ensure the implementation of the
Resolution on Academic & Budgetary Priorities as formulated by the Manoa Faculty
Senate and passed on January 19, 1994.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that these committees provide the Manoa Faculty
Senate with an annual summary.
Passed on January 10, 1996 at the Manoa Faculty
Senate meeting unanimously with 2 abstentions.
Linda Cox, Secretary E. Alison Kay,
Co-chair Kiyo Ikeda, Co-chair”
Resolution on UH Capital Improvement Budget for Fiscal Biennium 1997-1999
November 20, 1996
Vote Unknown
“Whereas the University of Hawaii Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal
Biennium 1997-1999 places "Hamilton Library Phase III" as the priority
construction project in the CIP budget;
Whereas construction of Hamilton Library Phase III is essential to continued highquality scholarship and teaching at all University of Hawaii campuses;
Be it resolved that the Faculty Senate endorses placing "Hamilton Library Phase III"
as the priority construction project in the University of Hawaii Capital
Improvements Program for Fiscal Biennium 1997-1999.”
Resolution Rejecting the Fiscal Proposals of the
Administration and Requesting Plans and Policies which
Will Grow Campus Enrollments
March 21, 1999
Deferred indefinitely
“WHEREAS, the UH-Manoa strategic plan adopted by the Board of Regents calls for
the UH Manoa campus to attain an enrollment level of 18,000 to 20,000 students;
WHEREAS, if the UH-Manoa campus were to grow to reach the level of20,000
students, additional revenues would be generated which would enable the campus
to support current academic programs and to undertake needed repairs and
upgrading of facilities, especially if significant recruitment of out-of-state students
were to occur;
WHEREAS, current and proposed actions by the Administration (e.g. the proposed
4+4+4 cuts, threats to transfer 101 funds to other campuses, and only token efforts
to recruit students) are not moving us in the direction of the strategic plan goal, but
in fact will have the opposite effect;
WHEREAS, cuts to UH-Manoa have been disproportional among the campuses in the
UH system, and consequent reductions in budgets and personnel have already
created great damage to our academic programs, and
WHEREAS, a "scarcity mentality" at the university is driving away many of our best
faculty and will be a significant barrier to attracting the best qualified persons in
future faculty recruitment;
THEREFORE, the faculty reject proposals for further cuts to the academic units of
UH-Manoa. We call upon the Administration to undertake an aggressive effort to
plan for the growth of student enrollments, including a comprehensive, multifaceted plan which identifies potential student markets for the programs at UHManoa and outreach and marketing efforts to effectively recruit from these markets,
including from the U.S. Mainland.”
Resolution Concerning Advocacy for Cross-Campus Issues
in the Next Biennium Budget
March 8, 2000
Passed: 35 in favor
No Link or Resolution found at this time.
Resolution on Advance Loans
Mary 9, 2001
Passed: unanimous
“Whereas the State decided not to pay faculty at the middle of April for the duties
performed on the first 4 days of April;
Whereas this added an additional burden on many and particularly young faculty;
Whereas the University administration decided to make partial paychecks available
to faculty who were on strike;
Therefore, be it resolved that we, the Senate, wish to express our gratitude to those
in the University administration who made it possible for checks to be prepared
expending University funds to pay striking faculty for those days worked in early
April.”
Resolution in Support of Fiscal Responsibility (from the
floor by Patsy Fujimoto)
October 15, 2003
Passed: 40 in favor
“Whereas, there is a critical fiscal and morale crisis at the University of Hawaii, and
Whereas, the Board of Regents is charged with the ultimate responsibility for
supervising and nurturing the University, its administrators, faculty, staff, and
students, and
Whereas, the Manoa Faculty Senate is the representative body of the University of
Hawaii Manoa campus, therefore be it,
Resolved, the Manoa Faculty Senate strongly supports the fostering of verifiable
fiscal responsibility at the administrative level and investigating the use of
University of Hawaii funds.”
Resolution on the Restoration of Restricted Funds
November 19, 2003
Passed: 37 in favor
“WHEREAS decisions regarding budgetary allocations among units--between the
System and campuses, among campuses, and within each campus--require an
orderly process of consultative deliberation, under conditions of maximum
transparency, and
WHEREAS there often are externally imposed restrictions on budgets, such as those
imposed by the Governor, and
WHEREAS any restoration of such externally imposed restrictions should not be
treated as an occasion to subvert the orderly consultative processes required by
policy in budgetary matters,
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that if the University's budget is subject to externally
imposed restrictions, and these restrictions are passed on to units, and if
restrictions are removed, then the funds released must be restored to units as they
were before the restriction.
All proposals for reallocations of funds, based on changing budgetary circumstances,
must be made publicly, with ample opportunity for discussion, including discussion
with the appropriate campus faculty organizations of the affected campuses, at UH
Manoa with the Manoa Faculty Senate.”
Presentation by Chancellor Peter Englert on Budget
February 18, 2004
No Vote
“
FY 2004
Estimated Revenues
Balances Brought Forward
Tuition and fees special funds
Research and training revolving funds
Subtotal carryover balances
Current Revenues
FY03 GF appropriation
FY03 CB allotment
Transfers
Tuition revenues [1]
RTRF revenues [2]
Executive/President restriction
Subtotal current revenues
Total Available Revenues
Estimated expenditures and assessments
Current program expenditures [3]
Expenditure/commitment of carryover/ balances
System assessments [4]
Other allocations
Unbudgeted commitments [5]
Total estimated expenditures and assessments
Estimated balance at end of the year
* excludes tuition and fees for summer session and continuing education
FY 2
9,266,252
14,670,666
23,936,918
186,088,473
0
(133,220)
53,500,000
22,412,894
(1,000,000)
260,868,147
284,805,065
186
251,983,613
23,936,918
4,800,000
0
5,900,000
286,620,531
(1,815,466)
263
FY205:
1. Tuition revenue projections: 3% increase in tuition rates and 2% increase in
enrollments
2. RTRF allocation assumes 10% growth over FY 2004
3. Current program expenditures include:
◦
last year's unbudgeted commitments
◦
Hawaiian initiatives
◦
APT professional improvement
◦
Worker's compensation shortfall
◦
RTRF expenditures
56
24
(1,
265
265
5
269
(3,
4. Includes:
◦
UH Foundation costs except school and college costs ... $900,000
◦
Risk management costs...$1,400,000
◦
Banner year two ... $3,430,319
5. Includes:
◦
Energy coordinator... $84,742
◦
Executive searches... $88,000
◦
New faculty, engineering... $130,000
◦
Law faculty... $120,000
◦
Nursing Accelerated BS new cohort... $139,358
Kathy Cutshaw asked what risk assessment funds were for. Rodney Sakaguchi
replied it is for use, minus a deductible, and suggested they come to visit MLT to
review the specifics of how the fund can be accessed.
Alan Yang asked if Banner expenses were initial costs of Banner central. Rodney
Sakaguchi replied it's for the initial expenditure.
Chuck Hayes asked what the best guess is on whether reserves will be spent by the
units, or if those expenses will be available to cover the deficit. Rodney Sakaguchi
replied it depends on units; they report they'll be spend.
Andy Hashimoto asked if the current budget outlook includes supplemental budget
allocations. Peter Englert cataloged what our request is, and indicated that it is not
included at this time in the budget -- because supplemental budget amounts are not
allocated at this time.
Andy Hashimoto also asked if it includes monies for medical school library. Rodney
Sakaguchi replied it is included as an expense.
Judy Hughes reported that next year we will be cutting many classes, so we need to
look at instructional expenses.”
Resolution on Missions Clarification and Budget Process
May 5, 2004
Vote: Unknown
“Whereas System budget processes and allocation methods are currently in need of
clarification; and
Whereas the approach to presenting funding requests to the Legislature also
interacts with budgeting among the campuses; and
Whereas System-level allocation methodologies further interact with campus-level
budgeting; and
Whereas the System administration and the Council of Chancellors is currently
engaged in a process of stock-taking, one of the aims of which is to inform
methodologies for allocations and for budget requests; and
Whereas any decision regarding budget depends crucially on clarification of the
respective missions of the individual campuses, particularly regarding the way in
which the mission of the University of Hawaii is distributed among the community
colleges, the four-year campuses and Manoa; and
Whereas Manoa's mission includes the functions of high-level research, graduate
education, community service, and advanced professional training--the costs of
which bear complex relationships to student numbers; and
Whereas the Council of Chancellors has established a working group on mission
clarification;
Therefore be it resolved:
That it is in the best interests of the University of Hawai'i system, and of the
University of Hawai'i at Manoa in particular, to first clarify the functional definition
of each campus within the UH System, and then to develop a budget process and
priorities that explicitly recognize the different missions.”
Resolution on Research Training and Revolving Funds
(RTRF)
April 20, 2005
Passed: 36 in favor
“WHEREAS the UH Manoa faculty are not informed as to how RTRF (Research
Training and Revolving Funds) are spent and there currently exists no
accountability to the faculty for the spending of RTRF funds and
WHEREAS the major source of RTRF funds is the reimbursement of indirect costs of
federal research grants, and these indirect costs are provided by the federal
government to support research infrastructure and
WHEREAS the faculty at UH Manoa are dependent on the research infrastructure
and
WHEREAS each individual unit determines and develops programs in part based on
the distribution of RTRF funds
BE IT RESOLVED that the Manoa Faculty Senate requests a yearly report in
September from the Offices of the Vice President for Research and the Vice
Chancellor for Research at Manoa, as to how RTRF funds were used in the previous
year and
BE IT RESOLVED that the Vice President for Research and the Vice Chancellor for
Research will also present their plans for the distribution of RTRF funds the current
year and
BE IT RESOLVED that the Manoa Faculty Senate requests that plans for RTRF
distribution from the Offices of the Vice President for Research and the Vice
Chancellor for Research be made in consultation with the Manoa Faculty Senate.”
Resolution on Legislative Budget
December 7, 2005
Passed, Vote: Unanimous
“Whereas, The State of Hawai`i is currently projecting a surplus of $632.6 million for
2006-7; and
Whereas, The Governor and Legislature agree that surplus funds should be
designated for higher and lower education; and
Whereas, The University of Hawai`i at Mânoa is facing a severe funding crisis
owing to the need to maintain, repair and renew its aging physical plant and owing
to projected steep rises in the costs of utilities, especially electricity, water and
sewer; and
Whereas, well-maintained physical plant and adequate resources for utilities are
vital to the mission of the University; be it
Resolved, That the Mânoa Faculty Senate respectfully urges that an adequate
portion of the projected State of Hawai`i budget surplus be used to address repair
and maintenance issues on UH campuses with a view to improving the resource
efficiency of the physical plant of the University and enable it to reduce its
consumption of vital water and energy resources”
Resolution on Retrenchment
October 21, 2009
Passed, Vote: Unanimous
“WHEREAS retrenchment at the University of Hawaii at Manoa (UHM) should not be
imposed until financial exigency has been declared according to the procedures
specified by the American Association for University Professors (AAUP) in their
document Recommended Institutional Regulations on Academic Freedom & Tenure;
and
WHEREAS, the 2003-2009 and currently enforced and continuing University of
Hawaii Professional Assembly’s Faculty Contract states that retrenchment can
only occur in case of a lack of work or other legitimate reason, such as fiscal
exigency; and
WHEREAS the UH Board of Regents (BOR) has not declared financial exigency; and
WHEREAS the AAUP requires that a duly authorized faculty body participate in the
decision that a condition of financial exigency exists or is imminent, and this has not
occurred; and
WHEREAS there are several new projects such as the expansion of University of
Hawaii-West Oahu and Maui Community College campuses that would indicate that
financial exigency is not imminent; and
WHEREAS AAUP standards are designed to protect the integrity of the institution in
part by means of a system of tenure, which is jeopardized by retrenchment;
Therefore, be it resolved, that the University of Hawaii Manoa Faculty Senate
6. (1) insists that any retrenchment be held off for lack of well-documented fiscal
exigency established by an appropriately constituted committee consistent
with AAUP standards; and
7. (2) asserts that any precipitate attempt to seek approval from the BOR for
retrenchment will place this institution at risk for formal censure by AAUP;
and
8. (3) asserts that retrenchment in any form will lower our national prestige, as well
as our ability to attract top-quality students, research funding from Federal
sources, and also State funding; and
(4) requests that copies of this resolution be sent to the Board of Regents, the
University of Hawaii President, the University of Hawaii Chancellors, Senator
Norman Sakamoto, Representative Jerry Chang, and Governor Linda Lingle.”
Motion to Pursue a Budget Task Force and Report back to
the Senate on November 18
October 21, 2009
Passed, Vote: Unanimous
No Link or Resolution found at this time.
Resolution on UHM Financial Assistance
November 18, 2009
Passed, Vote: unanimous
“Whereas, the University of Hawai`i at Manoa wants to provide the most financial
assistance to students,
Whereas, the University wants to attract Hawai`i’s best high school and
community college students to Manoa,
Whereas, we want to provide incentives for students to come to the University of
Hawai`i at Manoa,
Whereas, we want to diversify our student population,
Whereas, we want to attract and retain the best undergraduate and graduate
students,
Whereas, the administration already has initiated efforts to get deans to award
financial assistance to admitted students before they commit to attending Manoa,
Whereas, almost $6 million in scholarships went unclaimed during the last academic
year,
Be it resolved that the Manoa Faculty Senate urges the entire campus and all those
who have anything to do with financial assistance to award assistance in a timely
fashion that is of benefit to admitted students.”
Resolution to Establish a Task Force on the Budget
November 18, 2009
Passed, Vote: 1 opposed
“Whereas UH-Manoa appears to be in a budget crisis; and
Whereas the UHM faculty Senate has been a consistent and vocal supporter of fiscal
responsibility and the appropriate use of funds; and
Whereas the AAUP has recently advised faculty to guard against potential misuses of
such budget crises:
Many academic managers suggest that their institutions are facing a financial crisis
like that of bankrupt companies or states. Far more make the analogy than is
justified by institutions’ actual financial health. An emerging managerial
approach is to call for salary freezes, pay reductions, and/or furloughs for faculty to
address immediate budgetary challenges. A common managerial discourse is to not
waste a crisis to further increase managerial “flexibility.†We urge faculty to
address such proposals in the context of long-term trends that compromise higher
education.
(http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/newsroom/2009PRS/prnogivebacks.htm, August 18
2009); and
Whereas the various groups on campus currently looking at the state of our budget
labor under constraints that might limit the scope of their analysis and
recommendations; and
Whereas the entire University community will need to agree on what our situation
is, and what the options are, if we are to have any success in moving forward;
therefore
Be It Resolved that
I. The UH-Manoa Faculty Senate establish a Special Task Force
on the Budget.
II. The charge to this Task Force includes:
9. Confirmation of the extent of the fiscal crisis, especially at the Manoa
10.
Determination of whether there are sources of funds which have not been
considered by administration committees or offices working on the problem;
11.
Evaluation of potential solutions, such as enrollment increases and
retirement scenarios;
12.
Any other matters which they determine are relevant to the above.
It is understood that there are other campus entities, such as the office of the
VCAFO, the Chancellor's Budget/Prioritization Workgroup, and Senate's Committee
on Administration and Budget, which are working on these issues; the Task Force
should interface with these entities to avoid unnecessary duplication of effort and to
share information.
III. The Task Force will report to the Senate regularly through the CAB, and will
transmit a final report
containing their findings and any recommendations to the
whole Senate.
IV. While the Task Force will remain officially empaneled for the duration of the
2009-2010 Academic
Year, it is expected that they will give a preliminary report at
the December meeting of the UH-Manoa
faculty Senate, and their final report by the
February meeting of the Senate (if not before).
The names of people who have been asked and agreed to serve will be presented in
conjunction with
this resolution.”
Resolution on the Budget-Prioritization Workgroup
January 20, 2010
Passed, vote: unanimous
“WHEREAS the faculty of the University of Hawaii at MÄ noa (MÄ noa) have long
had a primary role in many campus decisions, including curricular and program
decisions; and
WHEREAS the Board of Regents (BOR) Reference Guide (August 2009) Sec II (C) (1)
Shared Governance cites as authoritative the joint AAUP, ACE and AGB 1966
Statement on Government of Colleges and Universities and further states that
faculty "have primary responsibility for the curriculum, methods of instruction,
research, and faculty status”; and
WHEREAS BOR Chpt 1-10 provides that “duly authorized organization or
organizations specified by each charter shall have the responsibility to speak for the
faculty on academic policy matters such as:
a. policy determining the initiation, review, and evaluation of proposed or
authorized research, instructional, and academic programs;
b. budget planning and implementation policy;
c. student-faculty relations policy;
d. policy for the evaluation of faculty and campus academic administrators;
e. the improvement and establishment of a canon of professional ethics and an
effective means of professional maintenance of those ethics, including faculty selfdiscipline; and
f. other subjects affecting academic policy subjects referred to it or them by the
Provost and/or Chancellor, or by request of the appropriate faculty organization”;
and
WHEREAS BOR Chpt 1-10 provides that “the role of a university faculty governance
organization is to advise the administration (primarily at the campus and unit level)
on matters impacting and/or relating to the development and maintenance of
academic policy and standards to the end that quality education is provided,
preserved, and improved” and that the pattern of faculty participation in exercising
its role in campus and University matters "will be realized in accordance with the
charters" (italics added); and
WHEREAS the MÄ noa Faculty Senate (Senate) Charter Sec. 5, Faculty
Representation on Committees, states “In forming standing committees, ad hoc
committees, task forces, working groups, and other advisory or decisionmaking
groups, the Administration will seek faculty representation. The Administration and
the Senate will act cooperatively to select faculty for these groups. The
Administration and the Faculty Senate will jointly make appointments from
nominations provided by the Senate”, and
WHEREAS the recognized faculty governance body at MÄ noa is the Senate; and
WHEREAS the Senate has established policies and structure for faculty participation
in shared governance and review of programs that have worked effectively and
efficiently for decades; and
WHEREAS AAUP Recommended Institutional Regulations on Academic Freedom
and Tenure on elimination of programs and/or termination of tenured,
probationary, and/or special appointment faculty due to “extraordinary
circumstances because of a demonstrable bona fide financial exigency, i.e., an
imminent financial crisis that threatens the survival of the institution as a whole and
cannot be alleviated by less drastic means” state that:
“As a first step, there should be a faculty body that participates in the decision that a
condition of financial exigency exists or is imminent, and that all feasible
alternatives to termination of appointments have been pursued. Judgments
determining where within the overall academic program termination of
appointments may occur involve considerations of educational policy, including
affirmative action, as of faculty status, and should therefore be the primary
responsibility of the faculty or of an appropriate faculty body. The faculty or an
appropriate faculty body should also exercise primary responsibility in determining
the criteria for identifying the individuals whose appointments are to be terminated.
These criteria may appropriately include considerations of length of service.
The responsibility for identifying individuals whose appointments are to be
terminated should be committed to a person or group designated or approved by
the faculty”; and
WHEREAS the Budget Prioritization Workgroup (BPW) is composed of thirtyeight
(38) members of whom only nine (9) are MÄ noa faculty; and The Budget
Prioritization Workgoup is the combined Budget Workgroup and the Chancellor's
Advisory Committee on Prioritization. The BPW is charged with developing medium
and long-term recommendations for the Chancellor's consideration and meeting
budget requirements for fiscal year 2011 and beyond based upon UH MÄ noa's
priorities. (http://www.manoa.hawaii.edu/ovcafo/BPW/index.html)
WHEREAS of the nine (9) faculty on the BPW only five (5) are Senate appointees, all
of whom had been nominated by the Senate to serve on other committees; and
WHEREAS even though the faculty on the BPW are valued colleagues, they do not
represent the faculty in accordance with the Senate Charter or distributionally as a
proper cross section of the faculty on campus; and
WHEREAS the Senate has requested that the Chancellor reconstitute the BPW with
an adequate representational number of faculty nominated by the Senate in
accordance with the Senate Charter,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,Â
That the Senate objects to the current membership of the BPW as it fails to satisfy
University policy or AAUP Guideline requirements pertaining to faculty
representation; and
The Senate reiterates its request that the BPW be reconstituted such that a majority
of its membership consists of Senate nominated faculty members who represent a
proper cross section of the campus; and
Unless and until the BPW is reconstituted in a manner consistent with the Senate
Charter and AAUP Guidelines any advice, recommendations, or decisions produced
by the BPW must not be represented or construed as reflecting formal or
representative consultation with, or involvement by, faculty, or as having received
the approval of the faculty.”
Resolution on Fiscal Responsibility, Best Practice, and
Unilateral Impositions
January 20, 2010
Withdrawn
“WHEREAS The Faculty has consistently advocated for fiscal responsibility at UH;
and
WHEREAS One aspect of being fiscally responsible is financial decision-making
based on evidence and transparency; and
WHEREAS Claims have been made that the UH System is fiscally insolvent, and that
the only solution is to cut faculty salaries; and
WHEREAS Little evidence has been offered to support these claims; and
WHEREAS Faculty members are professionally habituated to reject proposals based
on spurious data and/or unsupported assertions; and
WHEREAS Unilateral imposition by a University administration of decisions
affecting the academic mission of the University, without meaningful faculty
consultation, violates acceptable practice as spelled out in the Statement on
Government of Colleges and Universities issued jointly by the American Association of
University Professors, the American Council on Education, and the Association of
Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges in 1966; and
WHEREAS The Faculty has been prepared to engage in legitimate sharedgovernance decision-making to address the financial situation and has sought
evidence necessary for such decision-making to occur; therefore
BE IT RESOLVED that
The Faculty requests that the University System Administration provide
documented evidence to back any assertions of fiscal insolvency; and
The Faculty requests evidence showing that cuts to faculty salaries, elimination of
programs, firing of faculty or any other decisions affecting the academic mission of
the University are necessary; and
The Faculty requests evidence that all feasible remedieswith less impact on the
academic mission of the University have been implemented; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that
The University Administration provide evidence that best practice, including
meaningful faculty involvement, has been followed in the determination, evaluation,
and proposed use of the evidence referenced above.”
Approved Budget: 2011-2012
October 6, 2011
No Vote
“Regular Personnel Expenses $43, 923
Other Operating Expense $17,000
Relief Allocated to Units $36,432
Total Budget $97,355”