SYMPOSIUM ON FOOD CHEMISTRY AND QUALITY ASSURANCE 1 Alan Richards Head of Scientific Services Public Analyst (2m population) Official Agricultural Analyst President Association Public Analysts 2 Summary History of Food Adulteration in UK Public Analyst Links to Enforcement Legal Qualification (MChemA) MChemA Examination Certificates of Analysis EU Methods and UK Analysis Test Methods Food Complaints Other work of Public Analysts 3 UNITED KINGDOM 4 DURHAM 5 HISTORY OF FOOD ADULTERATION 1200 AD – KING HENRY II “GARBLE” 1700 AD – STEADY INCREASE 1800 AD – INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION 6 In 1820 A TREATISE ON ADULTERATIONS OF FOOD, AND CULINARY POISONS. EXHIBITING The Fraudulent Sophistications of BREAD, BEER, WINE, SPIRITOUS LIQUORS, TEA, COFFEE, CREAM, CONFECTIONERY, VINEGAR, MUSTARD, PEPPER, CHEESE, OLIVE OIL, PICKLES, AND OTHER ARTICLES EMPLOYED IN DOMESTIC ECONOMY. AND METHODS OF DETECTING THEM. By Fredrick Accum, OPERATIVE CHEMIST, AND MEMBER OF THE PRINCIPAL ACADEMIES AND SOCIETIES OF ARTS AND SCIENCES IN EUROPE. Philadelphia: PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY AB'M SMALL 1820. 7 Frederick Accum http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/19031 8 1851 - 54 ARTHUR HILL HASSALL Purchased and analysed 2500 articles of food and produced reports in the medical journal The Lancet identifying many examples of adulteration of foods. Information Link: http://www.rsc.org/Education/EiC/issues/2005M ar/Thefightagainstfoodadulteration.asp 9 Origin of UK Food Law 1860 1872 1875 1899 1928 1938 1955 1980 1990 1999 ADULTERATION OF FOOD AND DRINKS ACT ADULTERATION OF FOOD AND DRUGS ACT SALE OF FOOD AND DRUGS ACT SALE OF FOOD AND DRUGS ACT FOOD AND DRUGS ADULTERATION ACT FOOD AND DRUGS ACT FOOD AND DRUGS ACT FOOD ACT FOOD SAFETY ACT FOOD STANDARDS AGENCY 10 Modern Public Analysts English Law Courts Environmenta l Health Government Chemist Food Standards Agency Public Analyst Trading Standards Central Science Lab Consumers Industry 11 QUOTATION “The duties of the Public Analyst are daily increasing in complexity and difficulty. Higher qualifications than formerly are required of him, owing not only to the general advance in science as applied to the analysis of food, but also the exacting character of the numerous regulations of government departments concerned. . . . “ September 1923 12 Mastership in Chemical Analysis 13 Food Safety Act Certificate 14 The MChemA Examination Theory of analytical instrumentation, QA and statistics, Methods of testing, Laws relating to food, water and animal feeds Practical application of skills Ability to write certificates of analysis 15 MChemA Questions Day 1 Theory of Analytical Chemistry, 3 hours, Methods of analysis food, drugs & water 3 hours Day 2 law related to food, drugs and water, lab administration identify the six unknown substances using the microscope Day 3, 4 and 5 Practical Demonstration of Skills http://www.rsc.org/Education/Qualifications/MChemA/Index.asp 16 Certificates of Analysis Food Safety Act The FACTS The STANDARD The INTERPRETATION 17 Certificates of Analysis Food Complaint Certificate Full History Photographs Results of Analysis Interpretation None Technical Report 18 Other Certificates Agriculture Act Certificates Statements of Witness UKAS 19 Official Food Labs 20 Other Work 21 Other Work 22 UK Food Laws Pre 1980 – mostly set by UK EU Influence EU Methods of Analysis Contaminants in Food Regulation 2007 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 Commission Directive 2001/22/EC 23 Commission Directive 2001/22/EC Specific methods for the determination of lead, cadmium and mercury contents are not prescribed. Laboratories shall use a validated method that fulfils the performance criteria indicated in Table 3. Where possible, the validation shall include a certified reference material in the collaborative trial test materials. LOD - No more than one tenth of the value of the specification in Regulation (EC) No 466/2001, except if the value of the specification for lead is less than 0,1 mg/kg. For the latter, no more than one fifth of the value of the specification LOQ - No more than one fifth of the value of the specification in Regulation (EC) No 466/2001, except if the value of the specification for lead is less than 0,1 mg/kg. For the latter, no more than two fifths of the value of the specification. Precision HORRATr or HORRATR values of less than 1,5 in the validation collaborative trial Recovery 80-120 % Specificity - Free from matrix or spectral interferences 24 UK and EU Laws When searching for UK regulations I need the date of the regulation and the statutory instrument (SI) number. All current regulations are available on the internet on the website: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ EC regulations can be found on the website: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm The public analyst website offers a list of current regulations on their website at: http://www.publicanalyst.com/ 25 Sampling Formal Sampling – passing on Informal Sampling Complaints Regulation sampling Projects Surveillance 26 Glass Contamination 27 Fibres Human Hair Mouse Hair 28 Faecal Contamination 29 Moulds 30 Infestation 31 Authenticity Cod Salmon Haddock Coley 32 Modes of Adulteration ‘Stretching’ with neutral spirit (cereal or non–cereal derived) Geographic mislabelling Addition of flavourings Addition of sweetening Mislabelling of age 33 Chromatographic Analysis of Distilled Spirits Major Volatile Congeners (Mostly alcohols and esters) Compound Methanol Propanol Isobutanol 2-methyl-1-butanol Isoamyl alcohol Ethyl acetate Isoamyl acetate Polarity BP (°C) Concentration range polar polar polar polar polar 65 97 108 130 130 9 – 82 60 – 1330 150 – 620 1 – 360 0 – 770 polar ? polar ? 77 142 44 – 500 2 - 25 34 20 2 Methanol 25 4 6 8 2-Methyl-1-Butanol 30 iso-Butanol n-Pentanol n-Propanol 3-Methyl-1-Butanol Ethyl Acetate 35 n-Butanol iso-Amyl Acetate Acetal Acetaldehyde Modes of Adulteration pA 15 10 12 14 16 18 min 35 76 mAU 35 30 25 Ellagic Acid 77 15 10 5 Vanillic Acid 78 80 79 Signal=260nm 20 0 10 15 10 15 20 25 20 25 Coniferaldehyde Sinapaldehyde Syringaldehyde mAU Scopoletin 75 Vanillin Syringic Acid HMF Gallic Acid Cask Extractives Signal=280nm+340nm min min 36 Stable isotope analysis in food authentication Detecting the substitution of Organic crops with conventional produce Simon Kelly1 & Alison Bateman2 1 Institute of Food Research, Norwich, UK, NR4 7UA (simon.kelly@bbsrc.ac.uk) 2 University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK, NR4 7JT 37 Stable Isotopes of Nitrogen ‘light’ isotope ‘heavy’ isotope 14N 15N 7 7 - P 7 N 7 - - 99.63 % - - P 7 N 8 - - 0.37 % 38 Tomatoes – normal distn 0.20 Conventional 0.18 n=43 Mean = -0.1 n-1 = 2.1 0.16 Probability 0.14 Organic 0.12 n=61 Mean = +8.1 n-1 = 3.2 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 d N(‰)air 10 12 14 16 18 20 15 39 Tomato Data - 3-D Scatter Plot for variables d15N‰, Mn (ppm), Cu (ppm) & Rb (ppm) 40 A METHOD FOR THE SIMULTANEOUS DETERMINATION OF SWEETENERS IN FOODS Steve Appleton Durham Scientific Services steve.appleton@durham.gov.uk 41 Evaporative Light Scattering Detector (ELSD) Gaining popularity as a universal detector. Simple three step process Nebulisation – column effluent forms a dispersion of droplets Evaporation – mobile phase is evaporated, leaving a fine mist of dried sample. Detection – laser light scattered by sample particles is detected, generating an electrical signal. 42 Evaporative Light Scattering Detector (ELSD) Pro since all particles scatter light, all sample components are detected, regardless of their structure or optical properties. Con method limitations as it can only be used with volatile mobile phases and mobile phase modifiers 43 ELSD 44 ELSD plus UV 45 Elisa and DNA Protein Heat labile Cross reactivity Batch variation DNA Cooked foods Specific Simplified “lab on a chip” 46 Lab on a Chip 47 DNA Analysis Applications Fish & meat speciation Basmati rice authenticity Detection of bushmeat GMO testing Fruit juices Durum wheat 48 Fish Speciation Method uses PCR-RFLP A region of a specific gene is amplified by PCR using universal primers Produces a single PCR product of the same size from all samples Can be done on raw, cooked and some canned fish (not tuna) No need for a reference specimen 49 DNA Results Fish Species 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300 310 320 330 340 350 Atlantic cod Pacific cod Alaskan Pollack 50 Reminder A WRONG RESULT IS WORSE THAN NO RESULT AT ALL ! 51 THANK YOU 52