Sustainable Water Management in Small Island Countries Theme 3 Awareness political will, advocacy, community participation, gender equity environmental understanding Everyone is a water manager Our attitudes, beliefs, habits, customs, decisions and behaviour have an impact on the local watershed. For example, as Conference attendees, tourists: How much water am I using in this resort? Where is the coming from? Is it affecting the local community? Where is my waste water going? What detergents and other chemicals are used? Is the coral dead partly because of effluent from the resorts? If the fringing reef is damaged what impact does that have on livelihood and coastal protection? Who are the other water managers affecting this catchment? Local householders Farmers, loggers, factory owners Water Utility and Lands Department personnel Politicians who decide on budgets, programs, and approve development NGOs who advocate for the voiceless, and work within the community Regional organisations providing technical assistance and supporting research Donors who provide funding for programs How to achieve sustainable water management? By understanding the attitudes, beliefs and vested interests of all water managers Creating dialogue that results in motivation to change behaviour where necessary Action requires multi - dimensional approach to achieve changed behaviour and attitudes How to achieve sustainable water management? MOBILISATION To bring together all feasible sector allies to create demand for beneficial program or behaviour and assist with delivery of services PROGRAM COMMUNICATION Targeting specific audiences and groups with messages and training. Using traditional protocol, and non traditional inter-personal and mass media channels ADVOCACY Providing a voice, or facilitating the voiceless. Examining who is making decision and how? What is decided? How is it implemented?, Who benefits?, Who is disadvantaged? Equal Expenditure on Behaviour Change Need for equal expenditure on behaviour change, how water is used and valued There has been concentration on technical solutions. ‘Coverage’ does not always achieve public health, relieve poverty, or protect natural assets Coverage must be supported by behaviour change Toilet systems are built but may not being used or maintained, or they are vandalised Piped water is wasted, leaks not reported. People object to paying bills Rainwater tanks have been provided but gutters and downpipes are not maintained Private wells not covered Disease paths not understood. Hygiene not practised Outcome: High incidence of water borne disease, and diarrhoea in children under 5 in the Region Behaviour change requires time and money Takes time, patience, money, skill, Culturally complex, touches on taboos and personal habits/hygiene, Not as prestigious as infrastructure Outcomes are not obvious or immediate Behaviour change requires dialogue Receiving information does not always lead to behaviour change, even if message is entertaining Health and environment messages are often one way mass media, no space to identify own concerns How do people learn and remember? 20% of the information they hear 30% of the information they see 50% of the information they hear and see 70% of the information that they hear, see, and talk about 90% of what they hear, see, talk about, and do (SPACHEE/Ecowoman 2000) Behaviour Change requires opportunity Even if attitudes change, capacity and opportunity is required for behaviour change. Need time, flexibility, and viable alternatives clearly demonstrated Insufficient resources for Government employees to use training. Can contribute to ‘braindrain’ Women may not have time or fuel to boil water No safe waste disposal option available Behaviour change is not logical Habits such as sanitation practices are learnt at a very early age Not everyone believes the germ theory People may continue certain behaviour even if they know it is not good for them Not everyone wants to be consulted. Some people just want someone else to show the way. Visionary leadership is also required Mobilisation: stakeholder participation WHY? Programs which have not allowed stakeholders to be involved in decision making and management have usually failed. To promote user ownership of services, decisions should be taken at a level as close as possible to the source of the problem, in consultation with the people most directly affected Stakeholder responsibility 80-90% of PIC population use on-site water and sanitation facilities but have limited access to capacity building to encourage responsibility If centralised services are desired the Community needs to understand the cost of centralised services and accept ownership Stakeholders need to share information Responsible stakeholder involvement requires comprehensive information exchange and coordination Limited communication within departments, between government agencies, and between NGOs, donors and regional organisations Sector roles not clearly defined Stakeholder equity Do water sector policies and programs recognise differences in womens and mens needs, priorities, and access to resources? What negative and positive effects do policies have on women and men? eg downsizing water utilities? Are the youth involved in decision making about the long term future of their health and water resources? Stakeholder involvement can allow government and community partnership Government has limited purse so needs partnership with community, private sector and other stakeholders Government also has limited power to make decisions regarding the control of water resources, or to enforce regulations Empowerment could replace conflict Land is customary owned so centralised facilities such as water reserves, sewage treatment plants, require ongoing community agreement To avoid conflict communities could retain ownership of facilities. Could also be income generating Self regulation could replace weak enforcement Communities are related or familiar, so enforcement is awkward. Interference in private domain is not welcomed. Direct confrontation is uncommon Therefore well trained self-management and self-regulation is most feasible What is being done? Improved information exchange and consultation at all levels Attention to household-centered water and sanitation systems in some programs Improved customer/utility relations and demand management through institutional strengthening Integrated catchment protection Village Mobilisation - Waste Management (Tonga) Capacity building of “message carrier” Mobilising village resources for waste minimisation and catchment protection Gender dynamics in conservation Civic pride motivates conservation Local fund raising and commitment to sustain the program (not dependent on external funds) Waibulabula/Coral Gardens. Fiji Partnership between private sector (resort) and community (8 villages), University of South Pacific, Government, NGOs to protect livelihood and marine and fresh water Development of eco-friendly sanitation system with the potential for village use Operating through traditional protocol, decision making and consultation process Gender specific consultation process Community participation in groundwater research and protection Groundwater research involving Tongan Government, students, teachers, householders and supported by Regional Organisations Research designed and conducted by personnel from Health, Lands, and Water Board Increased understanding of use of private wells, raintanks, piped water Water Utility supports trial of non - polluting dry sanitation system Technology transfer of sanitation system through Government and Community co-operation Community Development and Participation Initiatives (CDPI) ADB project in Tarawa in Kiribati which aims to involve community in long term ownership of public water supply and sewage treatment systems Suggested initiatives Donors examine ways to sustain longer term funding to allow behaviour change, perhaps by serial funding. Maintain ongoing local workers for extended period Centralised information exchange: research process and outcomes, bi-lateral aid project reports, NGO and CBO activities , government agenda, planned programs Suggested initiatives Mobile training program for householders and tradespeople in selecting, siting, building and maintaining septic tanks, pits, composting toilets, rainwater tanks, wells etc Promotion of local e-mail service using shortwave radio, a low-end computer, and solar energy. Can be used for disaster mitigation, access to regional database, advertising eco-business. ‘People First Network’ in the Solomons Suggested initiatives Sanitation Park: Demonstration of sanitation systems (including cost)which allows villages to select system most appropriate to their needs. Assisted with construction Integrated Eco-Home: including all the inputs and outputs of a domestic compound. Zero discharge Suggested initiatives Develop and adopt National participatory frameworks that allow effective participation by civil society in water and sanitation management Adopt mechanisms to achieve gender equity at all stages of program design and implementation