Presentation (PowerPoint File)

advertisement

Multiscale Simulation of

Polymers

near (Metal) Surfaces

K. Kremer

Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Mainz

09/2005

Max-Planck Institute for Polymer Research

Mainz

Characteristic Time and Length Scales

Soft fluid

Time

Atomistic

Quantum Length

Local Chemical Properties  Scaling Behavior of Nanostructures

Energy Dominance  Entropy Dominance of Properties

Open Source Software:

ESPResSo

Modular Simulation Package by C. Holm et al

Method development will continue!!

E xtensible S imulation P ackage for Res earch on So ft matter

Central Topics of the Theory Group

Method Development,

Scientific Open Source Software (ESPResSo)

Charged Systems (SFB, Transregio, Gels)

Long Range Interactions, Hydrodynamics

 Membranes,….Biophysics

Multiscale Modeling

Analytic Theory of disordered Systems

Complex Fluids

Computational Chemistry of Solvent-Solute Systems

Melts, Networks – Relaxation, NEMD …

COWORKERS:

L. Delle Site

N. Van der Vegt

D. Andrienko ,

M. Praprotnik, X. Zhou (Los Alamaos Nat. Lab.)

N. Ardikari, W. Schravendijk, M.E. Lee

F. Müller-Plathe ( TU Darmstadt )

O. Hahn ( Würzburger Druckmaschinen )

D. Mooney ( Univ. College Dublin )

H. Schmitz ( Bayer AG )

W. Tschöp ( DG Bank )

S. Leon (UPM Madrid)

C. F. Abrams (Drexel)

H. J. Limbach (Nestle)

BMBF Center for Materials Simulation

Bayer, BASF, DSM, Rhodia, Freudenberg

Why Polycarbonate?

Modern application of Polycarbonate

New football stadium, Cologne, World Championship 2006

Why study Polycarbonate and the

PC/Ni interface?

Grooves and address pits of a die cast sample of polycarbonate for a high storage density optical disc

Bayer Materials

Why study Polycarbonate and the

PC/Ni interface?

d=λ/4

(

100nm)

“only” high tech commodity polymer

Specific Adsorption

Two extreme cases end adsorption only

“inert” surface energy dominated entropy dominated

Structure Property Relations for

Polymers - Linking Scales

Interplay universal - system specific aspects

Soft Matter??

Thermal energy of particles/ per degree of freedom

E=kT

Room temperature 300K:

E

1 .

38

10

23

J / K

300 K

4 .

1

10

21

J

 kT

Chemical Bond

Hydrogen Bond

E

E

3

6

10 kT

19

J

80 kT

10 kT

Soft Matter: Thermal Energy dominates properties

Energy Scale kT for T=300K

E

1 .

38

10

23

J / K

300 K kT kT kT

4 .

1

10

21

J

2 .

5

10

2 eV

9 .

5

10

4

E

H

4 .

1 pNnm

Electronic structure, CPMD

Quantum Chemistry kT

Biophysics Membranes, AFM kT kT kT

200

0 .

6 kcal / mol

2 .

5 cm kJ /

1 mol

Spectroscopy

Time and length scales

Properties

Macroscopic domains etc.

Semi macroscopic

L

 100Å - 1000Å

T

0 (1 sec)

Mesoscopic

L

 10Å - 50Å

T  10 -8 - 10 -4 sec

Entropy dominates

 

Mesoscopic

L

 10Å - 50Å

T

10 -8 - 10 -4 sec

Entropy dominates

Microscopic

L

 1Å - 3Å

T

10 -13 sec

Energy dominates

(Sub)atomic electronic structure chemical reactions excited states generic/universal *** chemistry specific

Mixtures Polymer

A

,

B

# AA , # BB , # A B contacts =O(N)

R

2

( N )

N

U

AB

N

AB

U

 eff

AA

U

AB

BB

N

Phase separation, critical interaction

 c eff

const

N

1

“chemistry ” “generic”

Intra-chain entropy invariant => small energy differences => phase separation

Example Viscosity h of a polymer melt

(extrusion processes ....)

Microscopic

L

1 Å – 3 Å

T

10 -13 sec materials/ chemistry specific Prefactor

T , h  A M X

“Energy dominated“ h A M X

Mesoscopic generic/universal Properties

L

10 Å – 50 Å

T

10 -8 – 10 -4 sec h  A M X X = 3.4

M molecular weight

“Entropy dominated“ varies for many decades varies for many decades e.g.: M 2M h (2M)  10h(M)

T =500 K 470K h ( T =470 K )  10 h(

T

 500 K)

(typical values for BPA-PC)

Micro-Meso-Macro

Simulation

Interplay Energy

Entropy

Free Energy Scale: k

B

T

(SEMI-)MACROSCOPIC

“Coarse Graining“

Inverse Mapping

MESOSCOPIC

Simpler Models

“Coarse Graining“

Inverse Mapping

ATOMISTIC

/

MOLECULAR

TODAY

Polycarbonate on Metal Surface

Linking Scales for Bisphenol-A-Polycarbonate

(BPA-PC)

– Molecular Coarse-Graining

Inverse Mapping, (Phenol Diffusion)

• BPA-PC Melts near Nickel Surfaces

– Ab initio calculations: Surface/molecule energetics

– Multiscale simulation: Molecular orientation at liquid/metal interface

– Adsorption at a step

– Shearing a melt

Molecular Coarse-Graining of

Bisphenol-A-Polycarbonate

Coarse-graining : map bead-spring chain over molecular structure.

=> Many fewer degrees of freedom

Inverse mapping: grow atomic structure on top of coarsegrained backbone

=>Large length-scale equilibration in an atomically resolved polymer

Mapping Scheme

Quantum

Chemistry

Monte Carlo, isolated all atom chain sample CG distributions on basis of all atom chain

Intra-chain potentials for CG melts at given temperature

Original Ansatz

O C O

O

C

1:2 Mapping

O C O

O

C

P(

P( l v

, l v

, a b v

,

, j

) j

)

P(

P( l v l v

)P(

)P( a b

)P(

)P( j

) j

)

}

Distribution

Functions

Thermodynamic Potential V

V ( l , b

, j

)

 

 ln

  ln

P ( l )

 ln

P ( l , b

, j

)

P ( b

)

 ln

Algorithmic speed

10 !

P ( j

)

}

Distributions include temperature!

MD simulation at one temperature, but with variable distributions .

Interaction Energies in the

Coarse-Grained Model

Angle potentials are

T-dependent Boltzmann inversions; e.g., at carbonate:

U

P

• Excluded volume

• Bonds

• Angles

• Torsions

T = 570 K

Molecular Coarse-Graining of

Bisphenol-A-Polycarbonate Melts

9.3-11.5 Å

A particular conformation of a 10-repeat-unit molecule of BPA-PC at atomic resolution;

356 atoms

Its coarsened representation in the

4:1 mapping scheme;

43 “beads”;

R g

2 › 1/2 = 20.5 Å; l p

~ 2 r.u.

Fast motion (e.g. bond vibration) is properly averaged over;

CG chain represents a multitude of underlying atomic structures

C. F. Abrams, KK, Macromol.

36 , 260(2003)

Results for Melts, N=20….120

– Molecular Coarse-Grained Melt

Inverse Mapping

End to end distance of coarse grained simulations agree to n-scattering experiments!

R

G

2

( N )

N

 o

37 A

2

Viscosity => Time Mapping

h  

R

N

2 k

B

T s

3

( N

1 )

2

36 D

• Melt simulation

• Viscosity from chain diffusion coefficient

Property of entire chains

 

2 .

2

10

11

(new data 2005) sec

[W. Tschöp, K. Kremer, J. Batoulis, T. Bürger, O. Hahn, Acta Polym.

49 , 61

(1998); ibid. 49 , 75].

How good are generated conformation?

Inverse Mapping:

Reintroduce Chemical Details

Coarse grained

BPA-PC chain

All atom model

Comparison:

Simulation n-Scattering

Structure factors of

(deuterated) BPA-PC

Right: standard BPA-PC

Bottom: fully deuterated BPA-PC

[J. Eilhard, A. Zirkel, W. Tschöp,

O. Hahn, K. K., O. Schärpf,

D. Richter,U. Buchenau,

J. Chem. Phys. 110 , 1819 (1999)]

Polycarbonate on Metal Surface

• Linking Scales for Bisphenol-A-Polycarbonate (BPA-

PC)

– Molecular Coarse-Graining

– Phenol Diffusion ( need atomistic resolution!

)

– Inverse Mapping, ( atomistic trajectories for entangled melts for up to 10 -4 sec!!

)

BPA-PC Melts near Nickel Surfaces

– Ab initio calculations: Surface/molecule energetics

Multiscale simulation: Molecular orientation at liquid/metal interface

– Adsorption on a step

Shearing a melt

Simulating

BPA-PC/Metal Interfaces

Molecular structure coarse-grained onto bead-spring chain

Simulation of coarse-grained

BPA-PC liquids (T = 570K) next to metal surface

Specific surface interactions investigated via ab initio calculations

Ab initio Investigations of Comonomeric

Analogues on Nickel

(CPMD Program: M. Parrinello)

CPMD: Propane and

Carbonic Acid on Nickel

Adsorption energy:

+0.01 eV (0.2 kT @

570K) for d  3.2

Å

Strongly repulsed, regardless of orientation propane carbonic acid

CPMD: Benzene and Phenol on Nickel

• Benzene: E ads

• Phenol: E ads

= -1.05 eV (21 kT @ 570K) at

= -0.92 eV at d

= 2 Å.

d = 2 Å.

• Both: Horizontal orientation strongly preferred, short-ranged: |E ads

| < 0.03 eV for d

> 3 Å

CPMD: Dependence of Phenol-Ni

Interaction on Ring Orientation

Interaction very sensitive to orientation!

CPMD: Conclusions

• Strong repulsion of propane and carbonic acid

+ the strong orientational dependence

+ short interaction range of phenol with Ni {111}

Internal phenylene comonomers in BPA-PC are sterically hindered from adsorbing on Ni {111}.

Torsional freedom in carbonate group allows for terminal phenoxy groups to adsorb

Coarse-Grained BPA-PC with End-

Group Resolution ( Dual Scale MD )

•Phenol-Ni interaction strongly dependent on

C

1

-C

4 phenol orientation

•In standard 4:1 model, phenoxy end orientation not strictly accounted for

Abrams CF, Delle Site L, KK, PRE 67, 021807 (2003)

•Resolving only the terminal carbonates specifies 1-4 orientation and is inexpensive

Results: Chain-end adsorption

Chain center-of-mass density profiles N = 10 monomers

M = 240 chains

 R g

2  1/2 = 20.5 Å

3 clear regimes:

• z <  R g

 bulk

: both ends adsorbed

•  R g

 bulk

2  R g

 bulk

< z <

: single ends adsorbed

• z > 2  R g

 bulk

: no ends adsorbed

Schematic structure of

“End-Sticky” Melts

Chains “compressed”

Chains “elongated”

Normal Bulk conformations

 Coupling Surface  Bulk?

Extension I: Other Chain Ends

Energy - Entropy Competition

Delle Site, Leon, KK, JACS, 126 , 2944(2004)

Extension II: Stepped Surface

Line Defect

Induced Ordering

L. DelleSite, S. Leon, KK, J. Phys. Cond. Matt.17, L53, 2005

Extension III: Shearing a Melt

end adsorption energy dominated case: phenolic chain ends

Surface Potential for Ends

0

  

1

Rouse

10

 

1

Rouse

Sheared melts

Both ends at surface

One end at surface

No end at surface

100

 

1

Rouse

EPL 70, 264-270 APR 2005

Extension IV: Jamming

Lubricants

BPA-PC plus 5% additives

Extension IV: Jamming

Lubricants

BPA-PC plus 5% additives

Jamming Lubricants

BPA-PC plus 5% (weight) additives under shear:

BPA-PC + 5-mers BPA-PC + DPC

Blue: major component Yellow: minor component

Jamming Lubricants

BPA-PC plus 5% additives under shear:

JCP 123 Art. No. 104904 SEP 8 2005

Specific Surface Morphologies – Multiscale

Approach

Coarse-graining onto beadspring chain

PC near Ni

Competition Energy- Entropy

Simulation of coarse-grained polymer next to metal surface (BPA-

PC)

Specific surface interactions ab initio calculations

(CPMD)

“sticky” chain ends

“neutral”

Coating/contamination with oligomers

C.F. Abrams, et al. PRE 021807 (2003)

L. DelleSite, et al. PRL 156103 (2002)

BMBF Zentrum MatSim

A few Challenges

Dual-Triple… Scale Simulations/Theory

Adaptive quantum

 force field

 coarse grained

• Nonbonded Interactions: NEMD, Morphology…

– Accuracy k

B

T O(1/N) needed!

Conformations

Electronic Properties

– E.g. coupling of aromatic groups to backbone conformation, or to other chains

Online Experiments:

– Nanoscale Experiments, long Times

Adaptive Methods:

Changing degrees of freedom on the fly

Adaptive Multiscale methods – Static and Dynamic

Simple test case

Polymers at surfaces,

VW Foundation Project

M. Praprotnik, L. DelleSite, KK, JCP, Nov. 2005

Adaptive Methods:

Changing degrees of freedom on the fly

Tetrahedron, repulsive LJ Particles,

Hybrids

 “Softer” Sphere

FENE bonds

Explicit Atom

Transition

Coarse Grained regime regime regime

Requirements

 Same center-center g(r)

 Same mass density

 Same Pressure (=>Eq. of state)

 Same temperature

 Free exchange between regimes

 Simple two body potential

Can be viewed as 1 st order phase transition

Phase equilibrium

Thermostat has to provide/take out latent heat due to change in degrees of freedom

Coarse Grained Model

Study explicite atom and CG system seperately

=> fit CG Interaction Potential:

U cm

( r )

 

{ 1

 exp[

 

( r

 r

0

)]}

2

 ex

=

 cg

, p ex

=p cg

, T ex

=T cg

Transition Regime

explicit hybrid coarse grained

F ab

 w ( X a

) w ( X b

) F atom ab

[ 1

 w ( X a

) W ( X b

)] F cm ab

Interactions explicit-explicit

CG-CG hybrid-hybrid

CGhybrid: CG-CG explicithybrid: explicit-explicit

Particle Numbers,

Density

Particle Exchange Radial Distributions,

Number of neighbours

Adaptive Methods:

Changing degrees of freedom on the fly

 Practical proof of principle

Many open questions:

Higher densities

 “real” systems

Inhomogeneous systems

Dynamics

 Other geometries

Multi level systems

A few Challenges

Dual-Triple… Scale Simulations/Theory

Adaptive quantum

 force field

 coarse grained

• Nonbonded Interactions: NEMD, Morphology…

– Accuracy k

B

T O(1/N) needed!

Conformations

Electronic Properties

– E.g. coupling of aromatic groups to backbone conformation, or to other chains

Online Experiments:

– Nanoscale Experiments, long Times

Solute Solvent Systems

van der Vegt, DelleSite

Combined CPMD and atomistic simulations for benzene adsorption out of water

=> Extension to more complicated systems

Ad-/Desorption

Process

P. Schravendijk, N. van der Vegt, L. Delle Site, KK, ChemPhysChem 6, 1866 (2005)

A few Challenges

Dual-Triple… Scale Simulations/Theory

Adaptive quantum

 force field

 coarse grained

• Nonbonded Interactions: NEMD, Morphology…

– Accuracy k

B

T O(1/N) needed!

Conformations

Electronic Properties

– E.g. coupling of aromatic groups to backbone conformation, or to other chains

Online Experiments:

– Nanoscale Experiments, long Times

Download