Mexican Revolution An overview review for my favorite history students borrowed from Mr. Millhouse at Hebron High School but adapted and made better because he left too much out. To what extent was Porfirio Diaz an effective leader for Mexico? Debate. Causes of the Mexican Revolution Who is Porfirio Diaz? Positivism Porfirio Díaz (1876-1910) Ruled as a dictator after seizing control of the government when he lost an election in 1876. New Creoles”– Ruling elite Prior to the Porfiriato, Mexico had no modern industry… Modernized Mexico by developing new industries including smelting iron and completed the national railroad. Opened the oil industry to American and British investors. Modernized the army and improved the banditry issue. Hired a British firm to redesign the urban sewage systems which increased health Refilled the national treasury and settled Mexico’s debts reformed the tax code to collect and utilize taxes more efficiently. Farms were refocused to mono-crop economies and most of the crops were exported for profit. Developed urban culture centers like the National Theater in Mexico City (promoted European theater and arts) Problems with Porfiriato Extreme poverty (wealth disparity) Working class wages declined 20% while COLA increased 80% Diet for the average person was corn and chile– no meat. Life expectancy was to age 30 compared to age 50 in U.S. and other developed countries. Infant mortality averaged 30% Land concentrated into 2% of the private population and peonage debt system developed (wages only spendable at “company stores” (tienda de raya) – laborer becomes indebted to the hacienda and cannot leave) No judicial protection from the hacienda Cultural adaptations favored European culture (specifically French), style, and attitudes. Bull fighting= baseball Did not support Mexican derived art or cultural ideology. Suppressed Mexican forms of literary and artistic expression And more problems Allowed political elections in 1880 by supporting a Porfiriato puppet. Ran for president again in 1884 and didn’t bother with future elections. Political favors and high level corruption; established jefes or political bosses to administer areas of Mexico (often wealthy families– hacendado system –Terrazas-Creel clan) Government seized significant tracts of farm land and church lands and sold it to “favorites” Cientificos promoted “social darwinist” ideology towards the indigineous population– extreme racism. Rigid press censorship and suppression of speech European and American investments: made Mexico dependent on foreign markets Liberal Plan of 1906 Objectives: Orozco, Arriaga, Madero, and Education: rural Labor: child labor, safety standards, and fair wages. Land: ejidos and peasantsbreak hacendados and legal protections Legal: rehabilitation, free speech, National sovereignty and ownership of national resources. Flores Magon Brothers Fought for freedom of press and the ability to publish their newspaper Regeneracion. Arrested for political dissidence on several occassions. Fled to the United States; first settled in Texas; but moved to St. Louis, MS after a Porfiriato assassin got too close Established a center for radical activities. Power to the people: Strikes 1905-1907 (talk to me) Cananea Consolidated Copper Company (Sonora) Inspired and encouraged by the Regeneracion. U.S. owned company. Turned violent; Colonel Greene called in U.S. for help: Arizona Rangers crossed border People on both sides were killed Mexican sovereignty was violated by US military. Sparked more revolts and protests throughout Mexico. Textile industry (VC) Strikers were unarmed. Tienda de Rayas Diaz arbitration Media suppression U.S. appeals denied Diaz decides to hold an election “No matter what my friends and supporters say, I retire when my presidential term ends, and I shall not serve again. I shall be eighty years old then. I have waited patiently for the day when the people of the Mexican Republic should be prepared to choose and change their government… I believe that day has come. I welcome an opposition party in the Mexican Republic.” James Creelman interview, Pearson Magazine, 1908 During the National Convention in 1910, Secretary Limantour nomimated Diaz and Corral (VP) as the candidates (even though there were other Porfirista supporters vying for the position) Reyes was logical successor of Diaz as his military general and war hero (Reyistas) Diaz accepted (and sent his competition [Reyes] away on a “military mission” to Europe) (Reyes never intended to challenge Diaz so why the mission?) Anti-Reelection movement Madero was a criollo; well educated, from a family of wealth and prestige. When revolutionary activity began as early as 1901, Madero helped fund a liberal revolutionary newspaper Mining, cattle, land, banking Madero was “Europeanized” and a “modern liberal”; He heard about the complaints on haciendas and worked to create fair conditions within his haciendas (only slightly more successful or generous than his peers) Had run for political positions, but always lost to Diaz appointees. Madero believed that nothing could changes until democratic processes created a new climate in Mexico. Challenges to Diaz: What did Madero believe? Single-term presidency should be focused on next generation (not next election) Problems of Mexico would solve themselves through the democratic process Free and honest elections “The Mexican people did not want bread; they wanted liberty” -Madero (during a political rally when asked why he would not break up his haciendas) Objective of the Mexican Revolution in 1910: Political Reform Start of the Revolution was primarily political in focus based on the lack of political elections and open democratic opportunities. Start of the Revolution was primarily political in focus Election of 1910 (21 June 1910) Madero had been arrested for abetting a fugitive from justice (during a political rally) With Madero in jail, Diaz won by a significant majority Made bail and put on house arrest, He fled and made his way to San Antonio, Texas where he rallied with other revolutionaries. Madero called for Díaz to be overthrown (Plan de San Luis Potosi) Francisco Madero (1911-1913) The Plan de San Luis Potosi “People in their constant efforts for the triumph of the ideals of liberty and justice, find it necessary at certain historical moments to make the greatest sacrifices. Our beloved fatherland has reached one of those moments. A tyranny that we Mexicans have not been accustomed to suffer since we won our independence oppresses us in such a manner that it has become intolerable. In exchange for that tyranny we are offered peace, but it is a peace full of shame for the Mexican nation, because it is based not on law but on force; because its goal is not the enrichment and prosperity of the country, but the enrichment of a small group.” First Phase Political Reform (Madero): Plan de San Luis Potosi Issued on 5 October 1910 Declared the presidency and all leadership of Mexico unconstitutional Demanded that all revolutionaries rise up and fight on 20 November 1910 Threatened to shoot Argued the Constitution is anyone who supported the supreme law of the land Diaz. (talk to me) Declared himself the lawful President of Mexico based on the election of 1910 Diaz is forced to resign on 25 May 1911. Revolution begins November 19- Madero crossed into Mexico but no one seemed organized so he crossed back into the U.S. However, insurrection started throughout Mexico forcing Diaz to spread his military in counter-attacks– November 20-21, 1910 Most successful fighting in Sonora and Chihuahua under the leadership of Orozco and Villa Madero finally joined the revolution in February 1911. Orozco tries to honor Madero as the revolutionary leader, but Madero is a terrible strategists… clearly a politician Why would this be a problem? Battle of Ciudad Juarez: April 2-May 10 Orozco and Villa recommend that the revolutionaries take control of Ciudad Juarez– border city across the Rio Grande from El Paso, Texas (would give easy access to resources, the river for travel, and an escape route) Initially, Madero agrees to the plan but at the last minute he changes his mind because he feared the U.S. might believe they were attacking U.S. soil. Orozco attacks anyway… Ciudad Juarez = rebel victory Madero angry that Orozco defied him so when he appointed his provisional cabinet, he did not appoint Orozco or Villa a position. The absence was noted. Battle of Ciudad benefits Battle of Ciudad negatives 1. 1. 2. 2. 3. 3. Treaty of Ciudad Juarez: May 21, 1911 Diaz and his presidency is over. Formal resignation May 25, 1911 Francisco Leon de la Barra (secretary of foreign relations) would be interim president until the next election (not Madero) with a porfirista cabinet… No reforms were stipulated. Interim Presidential Election Francisco Madero Resumes his anti- Bernard Reyes Returns from European mission Diaz message… Becomes the Porfirista candidate Wins election because there is no opposition… but Madero has made enemies. Madero’s supporters attacked Reyes at a rally Reyes freaked out and backed out of the election and moved to San Antonio Mexican Revolutionaries (1910) Pancho Villa Francisco Madero The Revolution Spreads: Madero out Lack of land and labor reforms led to open rebellion. Madero failed to make any significant changes to support the demands of the revolution. Emiliano Zapata “Land and Liberty” Pancho Villa Orozco is angry about his isolation and lack of inclusion after Madero has power. Carranza and members of Madero’s cabinet are disillusioned In total FIVE different revolutionary movements for various causes throughout Mexico Plan de Ayala Immediate and sweeping land reforms returning land to the peasants Plan Orozquista Immediate sweeping social and labor reforms Decena Tragica: counter revolution (the 5th rebellion?) Appealed to the Felix Diaz: traditional order Support from the disciplined military Only officers in Veracruz responded. Diaz arrested for treason and sentenced to death. Madero chose to appeal the death sentence. Why? Bernardo Reyes Nephew to Porfirio died on the first Diaz day of battle. (Felicista movement) February 9, 1913: Diaz plotted with General Manuel Reyes (who was Mondragon also in prison) for a released the second coup. prisoners and Military cadets helped lead a were used in the march on the battle that lasted 10 National Palace days. Huerta was in Civilian casualties charge of Madero’s (1000 + deaths) army defending. Results: Pact of the Embassy Disgusted by Madero’s indifference and mismanagement, Huerta switched sides and halted the defense of the Palace. Huerta arrested Madero and his cabinet. The final negotiations were handled by the U.S. (hmmm). Huerta’s coup was supported by Henry Lane Wilson– American Ambassador (Dollar Diplomacy) H.L. Wilson hated Madero and meddled shamelessly against him. Madero was eventually assassinated under the fake stories that Madero had tried to escape. General consensus: made up story but no one knows the truth or who ordered the assassination. How did Huerta end up in power legally? I love this story: Huerta demanded official resignations from Madero and Suarez Called a special session of Congress. Congress officially accepted the resignations (only 5 dissenting votes) 10:24 PM: Lascurain-- Secretary of Foreign Relations (next in line) was sworn in as President. Lascurain appoints Genera Huerta as Secretary of Interior. 10:36: President Lasurain resigns. According to the Constitution of 1857, in the absence of a President, Vice President, and Secretary of Foreign Relations, the Secretary of Interior shall assume the powers of the Presidency. Therefore, Huerta was sworn in as President just before midnight (he was already wearing a black tuxedo after all.) Who is Huerta? Could he have been a reformer? This is a counter revolution against Madero so other revolutionaries did not intervene at first … This is a return to a tyranny… Huerta had no intention of honoring democratic reforms and it escalated as the war turned against him. Like Juarez, Huerta was a native Indian who came from a small Jalisco village and attended the military academy on merit during the Porfiriato where he was charged with “enforcing peace” Huerta resigned after losing the Battle of Zacatecas 8 July 1914 18 months in power Huerta could not afford to pay the growing army and eventually collapses Huerta was forced to militarize Mexico in response to the Revolutionary movements throughout Mexico: (bad idea) • • • • • • • Leva, conscription retooling factories Moving army units were underequipped and would deplete food and supplies in each city. Reactionary to loss of battles against revolutionary groups Enacted censorship, secret police Political assassinations Arrogance: demanded loyalty and submission by revolutionaries. • Zapata refused to submit and arrested the “federal peace commissioners” Maybe a little progressive? Huerta did enact educational reforms and land reform: Focused on indigenismo; improving the quality of life for natives Secretary of Interior under Huerta- Aureliano Urrutia was a full blooded Indian and Huerta allowed him to work on village reform Agrarian reform: free seed distribution and authorized the restoration of 78 ejidos. Created a cabinet position to study land redistribution and propose constitutional changes. Opened 131 new schools for 10,000 students Raised teachers pay and liberalized the curriculum Promoted national military schools (think Napoleon) Increased educational budget to 9.9% (Madero 7.8% and Diaz highest 7.2) Attempted minor labor and church reform (lacks significance) Essential Questions Examine the objectives of the Mexican Revolution of 1910. To what extent are the objectives of the Revolution satisfied by 1920? Compare and contrast the objectives of revolutionary factions of 1910-1920 To what extent was factionalism an obstacle to the advancement of the Revolution? Analyze whether each key player in the Revolution was a revolutionary or a reformer. Resistence Coalition: plan de Guadalupe Carranza: Coahuila First chief of the “Constitutional Army” Similar to Madero: political plan only Obregon: Sonora Signed Carranza’s plan with reservations Pancho Villa: Chihuahua Aligned to Carranza’s plan Zapata: did not support Madero, Huerta or Carranza because neither group offered reforms. Zapata still helped by diverting resources What were the demands of Orozco? Social and political reform: Nationalization of Liberal Plan of 1906: resources including the railroad Redistribution of land to anyone living on land for 20 years (title) Any lands illegally seized from peasantry were returned to the ejido Government land and fallow hacienda lands were to be redistributed 10 hour work day Restrictions for child labor Improved working conditions with safety measures Higher wages Suppression of the tienda de raya Fighting in the South (Zapatistas) Plan de Ayala Wanted to be free from government tyranny Wanted agrarian land reform and the land to be redistributed and given directly to the farmers (ejidos) including “illegally seized lands”. The burden of proof for ownership would be on the Hacienda and usurpers Demanded 1/3 of church land and hacienda land given to the villages. Wanted better living conditions for indigenous Indians. Wanted improved educational opportunities. U.S. and foreign policies Huerta lost U.S. support when he failed to stabilize the country. Woodrow Wilson would not acknowledge Huerta because he was “anti-democratic” under his “Moral Diplomacy” (after all what is Woodrow Wilson’s policy now?) Wilson felt Huerta was a bully and arrogant. Huerta called Wilson the “Puritan” and thought he was equally arrogant. They are both right… The Confrontation in Veracruz over rumors Germans were bringing in weapons (Tampico Affair) What was the Tampico Affair? Spring 1914 (April) The U.S. parked a navy vessel USS Dophin off the coast of Mexico A small landing party was ordered to get gas Sailors wandered into restricted area and were arrested (paraded through the streets under arrest to the prison… publicly humiliated) An hour later, Mexico sent an official policy and released the sailors (no harm no foul)? American admiral said he wanted more apology and demanded Mexico fly the American flag over Tampico port and offer a 21 gun salute (highest acknowledgement) President Woodrow Wilson thinks this is a great solution Mexico first said no. US threatens military action. (Huerta) said sure if America returns the salute. Wilson realizes if he agrees, he is acknowledging the Huerta regime. Wilson says no. Stalemate Break the stalemate; the Germans are coming? U.S. consul sends Wilson a message saying a German ship is scheduled to arrive on 21 April with a large shipment of arms. Wilson demands a full naval occupation of Veracruz and seizes custom houses People die in the hundreds (many civilian) Riots break out and anti-American sentiment is out of control Everyone condemns U.S. (Pigs of Yanquilandia) Constitutionalists condemn Huerta too. Huerta forced to resign and blames U.S. Some say this would lead to the Zimmerman Note in April 1917- German’s say Mexico should develop their own relationship and not be U.S. puppets… Yikes Third Phase: The Constitution and Carranza Military Convention of Aguascalientes October 1914 met to try to reform the Mexican Constitution and stabilize leadership What’s up with flags? The Flag of the Convention was signed by participants as a symbol of support for the new order… until Zapata’s representatives arrived. Revolution split between the Zapatistas and Villistas (reformers) and Carrancistas and Obregonistas (Constitutionalists) Results of Aguascalientes Eulalio Gutierrez The division of the chosen as provisional Constutitionalists led president of Mexico. some to support the Revolutionary Carranza stormed movement. out of the convention in protest. Established a Meeting of Constitutional Xochimilco government in Veracruz (where did the US go? Hmmm). Will the real revolutionaries please stand up? This is the problem for sure The Centaur of the North Villistas Attila of the South Zapatas 1915 is noted as the year beginning uncontrolled chaos, excessive violence, and increasing death of both military and Civilian populations. Emergence of warlords in smaller regions seized control of various areas in self-interest Is the Mexican Revolution also a Civil War? Three Mexican Factions with Five Presidents Gutierrez (considered the “legit” government) controls Mexico City calls themselves Conventionalists Carranza appealed to masses from Veracruz with support from Obregon called Constitutionalists Mexican Constitution of 1917 Villa becomes governor of Chihuahua and claims he is President of Mexico Zapatatistas supports Roque Gonzalez Garza (who?) Battle of Ceyala April 1915 Villa attacked with Villa is becoming very weak and distracted because of US 25,000 men. Villa lost 15000 men Obregon (leading Carranza’s men) lost President Wilson 500 (USA) supported Obregon used new Constitutionalists military tactics being and withdrew from used in European war Veracruz (barbed wire and artillery barrage) US Intervention Villa began to harass US-- killing American citizens. General Pershing goes after Villa: $130mil. Spent on capture efforts Santa Isabel: Villa kills 15 American engineers sent to reopen a mine in Mexico. Columbus, NM: Villa Carranza protests US action on Mexican soil and in 1917 Pershing is forced with withdraw. Never captured Villa attacks small American town; killed 18, and destroyed town raider style Constitutional Convention 1917: Queretaro Congress Carranza calls on Mexico City to consolidate power and hold the convention -- quickly realizes the Constitutionalists are unfocused and divided No reformers were invited New Elite: 70% of the Convention are non-military. ½ the Delegation are educated– university level with professorial degrees Young, middle class, politically ambitious Leader Francisco Mugica Many considered radical liberals and wanted total overhaul of society. (nicknamed Jacobins by their enemies… reference?) Carranza the Moderate: Repeat of the Constitution of 1857– not enough– liberals demand more reform and win! 5 anti-clerical amendments 3, 5, 24, 27, 130 Marriage declared civil No legal status or protection of religious organizations Priests classified as “ordinary citizens” States could limit number of priests Priests had to be native born ceremony No public worship outside of church and church grounds No religious political parties All religious developments must be approved by the government Church accused of blocking social progress Anti-clerical amendments All promoted the federal government authority over the authority of the Church. Article 130 determined that members of the clerical order were not citizens of Mexico because their loyalty was to the Pope. This would have far reaching concerns for the clerical population. Caused concern from the Vatican Pope Pius XI denounced the Constitution creating a crisis for Mexican citizens Article 3: very controversial Primary education should be free and obligatory. Education must be secular. What’s the concern? Can you really limit Catholic schools and access to this form of education? Available to all citizens Who will pay for it if Supported 2:1 the Church’s aren’t in charge? How? Article 3: Education reform Compromised with the Church to help build educational opportunities but was anti-clerical in terms of social control Vasconcelos made the Secretary of Education and worked to improve schools. Commissioned Diego Rivera and other writers and artists to develop nationalism and Mexican pride and educational reforms. Education for children and adults to improve literacy and citizenship Carranza: --anti-Huerta- Is Carranza a “counter-revolution?” Despite Vasconcelos, Carranza does not have a supportive educational record: Carranza reduced teacher salaries Closed rural schools Only dedicated 0.09% of the federal budget to education (Huerta was 9.9, Madero 7.8) Social programs dropped from 11.6% to 1.9% Argument: waste of necessary federal monies and it was Huerta’s greatest achievement… Article 27: the Zapata amendment? Land Reform Subsoil rights. Only Mexicans by birth or naturalization can own land (unless given government permission and promise to follow government law.) Nationalized oil? Kinda… The Bucareli agreement worked with U.S. oil refineries to allow foreign ownership as long as “positive acts were conducted” to improve conditions in Mexico, taxes were paid and labor laws were honored. Nationalized Mexican land and protected private property ownership from expropriation But did it work? Land must be used for the good of public interest Broke the large hacendado system Redistributed land to the farmers and land laborers (in order to keep peace with larger land owners, Also confiscated Church land which will be controversial as it attacks Church power and authority Constitution of 1917 and Carranza’s legitimate presidency marked the end of the Mexican Revolution. To what extent do you agree? Laid basis for land reform 450,000 acres of land redistributed (700 sq mi) (Stockton is 40,000 acres or 62 sq mi, Sacramento is 100 sq mi, Los Angeles is 503 sq. mi): San Joaquin Count is 912000 acres or 1400 sq mi. California is 164,000 sq. mi (104 million acres)… One Terraza family member owned 7 million acres No major redistribution until 1934 Carranza shuts down Zapatistas Carranza sends federal troops to Zapatista towns creating violent battles and total destruction of the region Can’t find Zapata directly so schemes Colonel Guajardo sends message to Zapata saying he wants to mutiny support Zapatista movement. Zapata suspects trap and demands release of Zapatistas... Guajardo complies and seizes Jonacatepec. Zapata cautiously agrees to meet April 10, 1919 Hacienda de Chinameca When Zapata rode into the courtyard, Colonel greeted him and a bugle sounded… Soldiers shot Zapata at point blank range. Considered the ultimate betrayal of the country. We will come back to this Article 123: Labor reform Established an 8 hour work day with overtime options Outlawed child labor and improved work conditions for workers over 14 and for women including maternity protection Established equal pay between men and women (very liberal) Established a 6 day work week Established a minimum wage paid in a national currency without restrictions Improved work conditions and safety regulations Allowed for union development and the ability to strike Union CROM (Regional Confederation of Mexican workers) to protect labor conditions and continue to improve labor situation Labor Reform: Orozco and Villa win the day? NOPE. New labor laws Carranza was anti-union and worked against union organization in 1915. After the passage of Article 123: Carranza simply did not enforce the law and referred all issues to the federal courts (which weren’t fully organized yet). Despite his lack of support: CROM will develop. “Confederacion Regional Obrera Mexicana” first major nationwide union. No major enforcement of labor laws until 1931 What happened to Carranza? The Plan de Agua Prieta: The Obregonistas The assassinations (including Zapata’s) and the lack of implementation of the Constitution caused many supporters to denounce Carranza 1920 election (no re-election rule) Carranza was not eligible to run and tried to name his successor. Some “no name” civilian (Ignacio Bonillas). Obregon accused Carranza of rigging the elections and felt he should have received Carranza’s support based on his loyalty and alignment. Created an alliance with northern generals: a different guy named Huerta and another guy named Calles (we need Calles’ name). Marched on Mexico City; Carranza tried to flee the capital to exile. Assassinated by one of his own guards who is a suspected supporter of the Obregonistas What happened to Pancho Villa Tried to resist Carranza until 1920 but was very ineffective after Ceyala He is offered a large hacienda (25,000 acres) in Chihuahua and retired. (Interim President Huerta brokered the deal) Created a military compound for his soldiers to have a haven to also retire. Villa militia was given 500,000 pesos to maintain the compound (by the govt) Is Villa a sell out? He was assassinated in 1923. NO one knows who ordered the hit, but Obregon is suspected. Aftermath of Revolution Military Phase 1910-1920 Both sides guilty Over one million people died (somewhere between 1.5-2 mil total but accurate records were not kept in the rural regions). 1/8 of total population: Every family lost someone. Most deaths were after battle from wounds and illnesses and lack of medical care and training. Deaths included combatants, executed political prisoners and civilians caught in the insurrections Violent and brutal behaviors during the revolution: mutilated bodies and lynchings were common undermining the idealism of the revolution. Refugees flee Mexican violence: Oct 1913: 8000 crossed the border in Texas Farming, ranching, and mining economies were destroyed by fighting and loss of laborers Oil industry improved during revolution (WWI and Foreign ownership <US>?) No major bank or newspaper survived Large cities demolished and reversed whatever infrastructure had been developed during the Porfiriato Schools were destroyed as symbols of “thought control” and over 100,000 children could not return to school. Xenophobia: a backlash Reactionary to Diaz coddling of foreign interests. Labeled exploiters and often targeted by revolutionary groups. Stories of foreign residents murdered (village of 200 Chinese migrants– Spanish expelled by Villa– US based Mormon missionaries were targeted and forced to leave their mission duties) But the good: Emerging Mexican national identity that includes the masses. Shifting expectations of land and labor Constitution and a move towards a republic base of power Recognition as an American independent nation Women in the Revolution Intellectuals Called for equal rights, women’s suffrage, and other reforms Often endured threats, imprisonment, etc. Soldaderas Served as nurses, cooks, foraged for food, washed clothes and other services Served in the rebel army and the federal army Women Soldiers fought alongside the men with equal honor Women workers and farmers when the men were gone. Were often at the mercy of passing armies: noted stories of rape and assault Women in the Revolution Women in the Revolution Soldaderas and the role of women: emancipation and liberalism Women found new opportunities after the war because of the shortage of adult males due to such a high death count. Women could contract themselves more favorably. Women found a new voice in local governments after earning the “respect” of their male peers during the fighting. New educational opportunities developed in response to these new roles being filled by women. Cultural and art movement develops to define a new identity Mariano Azuela wrote Los de Abajo focused on telling the story of the revolution through the perspective of the masses. It is an honest insight and criticism of the revolution as it affected people. Mexican music: Manuel Ponce and Carlos Chavez-- native sound develop that blend folk tradition Adelita, Valentina, La Cucaracha and other songs of the revolution became national anthems and ballads Art movement and muralism Artists were some of the most vocal opponents of the Diaz regime and the limitations of art in the Porfiriato. Ironically, Huerta was the leader who assigned a native director to the Art Academy: Alfredo Ramos Martiez who reformed the curriculum and introduced a native identity to visual arts. Introduced muralism. Diego Rivera Diego Rivera The Constructive Phase “The revolution begins when the fighting ends” – Dr. Marjorie Sanchez Walker Constructive Phase 1920-1930 Is the Revolution over at this point? Obregon elected President in a legitimate election after Carranza flees (November 1920). Obregon implements the constitution and national reconstruction– focuses on reconstruction and education reforms through modest but decisive changes. Struggled with the Post-WWI slump and finding markets for Mexican resources Oil industry was thriving but largely foreign owned– Obregon slowly nationalize the oil industry and pushed out foreign companies (this will become a controversial decision with the U.S.) Producing 193 million barrels of oil: 3rd largest producer Jose Vasconcelos Article 3: Vasconcelos: Secretary of Education Considered one of the brightest minds of Mexico Vasconcelos was anti-Diaz Ateneo de la Juventud Supporter of Madero Constitutionalist activist during Huerta’s regime Carranza supporter of educational reform Obregon makes him an official cabinet member Vasconcelos continued Huerta’s and Naranjo’s reforms Continued revision of curriculum Patron of the rural school Advocated for increased educational funds Compulsory streamlined education of rural children in elementary: Reading, writing, arithmetic, geography, Mexican History. Resistance to teachers: viewed as government agents encroaching on church domain. Shift in time and with adult education. Built over 1000 schools and 2000 libraries built in 4 years (1920-1924) (portable libraries for rural schools) Article 3: flaws and compromise The government did not have enough money to fully implement secular free compulsory education. Allowed some church schools with strict oversight and control of the curriculum Encouraged Protestant missionaries and the YMCA to establish schools and social programs. Murals: Cultural art told stories and history lessons Used to teach Mexico history to illiterate and non-Spanish speaking citizens. Created a national identity on an international level. Included a native identity: murals reflected society. Article 123: Labor reform Obregon worked with Luis Morones (head of CROM) and supported the union organization to avoid any labor backlash. Modest reforms laborers were offered some protections in various industries. CROM membership rose from 50,000-1.2 mil in 4 years. Labor disputes were often handled locally and Obregon received criticism for not being more directly pro-active in thee labor issues. Other unions were not supported…radical antigovernment unions were crushed. Communist Federation styled after Marxist ideas Industrial Workers of the World (Wobblies) anarchist Considered foreign influence and extremist therefore outlawed. Some critics argued his favoritism undermined the power of CROM Article 27: Land reform Compromised on land distribution. Feared a breakdown of haciendas would result in a drop of agricultural productivity (farms are already destroyed and people are starving– can’t risk it) Feared a backlash and loss of support from the United States regarding foreign investment Proceeded slowly but Obregon redistributed 3 million acres of land to over 600 villages establishing “ejidos” during his presidency benefitting 140,000 villagers Criticized by Soto y Gama and other Zapatistas for not supporting land reform properly. Obregon and the United States President of the United States: Warren G. Harding – Republican supporter of Capitalism, Freeenterprise, and big business. Large influence by the oil industry and Sinclair, Doheny ,Hammon (oil giants) Extra Credit: research the Teapot Dome Scandal Argued to protect U.S. investment and ownership in Mexico and protested Article 27 Demanded withdrawal of presidential recognition if Obregon enforced the article Constitutional interpretation: Obregon fears economic destruction if oil production stops. Obregon fears political suicide if he caves to US pressure Mexican Supreme Court intervened and ruled that oil companies would not be seized if the company was performing “positive acts” of development prior to the implementation of the Constitution. What is a “positive act”? Bucareli Agreement Allowed active investors in Mexico to retain their property. Allowed Mexican government to seize fallow and undeveloped land from foreign investors. Set precedence for future investments with foreign investors Worked towards resolving “loss of property” claims during the revolution. Mexican nationalists viewed the Bucareli agreement as selling out Mexican rights and called for revival of revolution: Is this why Villa was threatening to come out? Plutarco Elias Calles: Considered a radical liberal Faced immediate opposition: Conservative Catholics Hacendados Military leaders who felt Obregon Nationalists (antiBucareli) Silenced labor leaders De la Huerta (insulted he didn’t receive the nomination) Remained loyal to Obregon: Most of the military CROM and the workers of CROM U.S. Diplomatic recognition. Peasants. Legacy of Obregon Very progressive in presidency based on Mexican history. Could not satisfy all factions Labor leaders not part of CROM Church (even though Obregon avoided enforcing the anti-clerical laws) Hacendados and Large land owners Some foreign investors Would encourage a peaceful transition of the presidency to Plutarco Calles Cristero Rebellion Calles decided to enforce the anti-clerical laws in order to strengthen the Federal government. Archbishop of Mexico told Mexican citizens to reject the Constitution of 1917 and called for another revolution. Calles disbanded the clerical orders Churches went on strike and shut down for three years. This led to an attack on civil institutions (secular schools, government buildings,etc) Military murdered Church officials and priests and looted churches Obregon ran for re-election in 1928 wanting to resolve the rebellion and restore order. Won the election but was assassinated on the day he was to take office. Assassinated by a Cristero supporter of Madre Conchita (a Cristero radical nun) named Toral. Both were prosecuted. Toral was executed and Conchita received the maximum penalty allowed for a woman (20 years) Calles supporter were appointed to run for President and Calles established the Maximato (puppet presidents under his influence) from 1928-1934 A single party state emerged (PNR) Lazaro Cardenes Originally a supporter of Obregon and Calles Considered a liberal reformer Refused to allow Calles to bully his presidency by replacing the cabinet and exiling Calles and his Callistas Well respected governor of Michoacan who had a direct relationship with the people rather than bureaucrats Continued land redistribution to communal ejidos. Continued to implement secular education and minimize church influence with a large financial commitment to rural education Allowed the CTM to develop (another labor union) to continue to improve labor and working conditions. Nationalized oil despite U.S. protests (the Great Depression and Roosevelt’s anti-intervention policies kept U.S. protest minimal and forced economic cooperation) Eventually, Cardenes ran out of money and his reforms slowed down By 1940 Historians argue that most of the reforms of the Mexican revolution were achieved. To what extent do you agree? Land reform– ejidos is there enough land redistribution? Labor reform– CROM and CTM – is there enough protection? Social reform– male dominated society but women had more educational and social opportunities Education reform– development of rural schools and modern universities – does it improve the lives of the average citizen? Urbanization – development of Mexico City as a cultural center with arts, music, and literature that reflected a true native Mexican identity – is there enough advancement to positively change the daily lives of people? Industrialized and advancing technology (railroad, oil refineries, advanced farming equipment) – does the Mexican economy stabilize and improve? Long term impact of Mexican Revolution For more information: go to my website and read Chapter 39 of the “Reform Phase” file You should also read Chapter 40 the Post Revolution file. It discusses how WWII impacted Mexico (this could help on Paper 2 and 3 in a major way) and stalled the continued progress. Mexico will eventually deteriorate and undo all of the Revolutionary reforms. If you are REALLY interested in the long term impact of the Revolution, borrow the book from me and read the 4th section (several chapters) because it covers Mexico into the modern age Paper 2 favorite question: How did WWII impact the development of a society in TWO regions (You could talk about Mexico compared to Germany division or breakdown of society in Eastern Europe, etc) Paper 3 favorite question: How did WWII impact (one or two countries) in the Americas (U.S. development and Mexico)