Traj Validation Slides

advertisement

Trajectory Code Validation

Slides

04/12/08

AAE 450 Spring 2008

Trajectory Simulation – Drag Loss

 Results:

 Compare to Shuttle (2029633 kg GLOM): 107 m/s

Titan IV/Centaur (886420 kg GLOM): 156 m/s

(from SMAD)

AAE 450 Spring 2008

Trajectory Optimization

Chua – 01/31

Scott Breitengross

Feb 7, 2008

Trajectory group, Delta V

Delta V determination, Saturn V comparison

AAE 450 Spring 2008

Changes and Assumptions

 All stages masses modified to Saturn V

 Engine thrust and exit area modified

 Burn Time and mass flow rate modified

 Stage diameters modified

 Assume ΔV_Leo is same

*All Saturn V specs provided by http://www.nasm.si.edu/collections/imagery/apollo/saturnV.htm

AAE 450 Spring 2008

Trajectory

ΔV Calculations

Launch Type ΔV_Grav ΔV_Drag ΔV_Total

Default Inputs

Saturn V Inputs

1310 m/s 293 m/s ~15000 m/s

2362 m/s 36 m/s ~11000 m/s

Future Work

 Continue on Trajectory Model

AAE 450 Spring 2008

Trajectory

Brad Ferris

02/21/08

Trajectory Analyst

Modeling Drag

Assistance provided by Jayme Zott, Kyle Donohue

AAE 450 Spring 2008 6<#>

Modeling

 Assumptions:

– Atmosphere molecular weight is constant

– Angle of Attack is zero

 Speed of Sound: a = [ γRT] 1/2

 Use Mach Number to get C

D

 Apply Equation for Drag

D = C

D

* q * S

AAE 450 Spring 2008

Trajectory Optimization

7<#>

 With function, notice drag behavior

 Over most

Mach numbers, drag without function is higher

Validation

Drag Force v. Mach Number

25000

20000

W/O Function

Cd Function

15000

10000

5000

0

0 1

AAE 450 Spring 2008

Trajectory Optimization

2 3

Mach Number

4 5

Figure by Brad Ferris

8<#>

Orbit parameters

 Without Function

– 762 / 232710 km

(periapsis / apoapsis)

– Eccentricity: 0.942

– Delta V Drag: 461 m/s

– Delta V Total: 10760 m/s

– Steering Angles:

6,-28,-28 deg.

 With Function

– 807 / 232477 km

(periapsis / apoapsis)

– Eccentricity: 0.942

– Delta V Drag: 384 m/s

– Delta V Total: 10672 m/s

– Steering Angles:

6,-28,-28 deg.

AAE 450 Spring 2008

Trajectory Optimization

9<#>

25000

20000

15000

10000

5000

0

0

Drag and Time

Drag v. Time

W/O Function

Cd Function

50 100

Time (s)

150 200 250

AAE 450 Spring 2008

Trajectory Optimization

Figure by Brad Ferris

10<#>

Junichi (Jun) Kanehara

02/21/2008

Trajectory

Validation of Thrust in the Trajectory Codes

AAE 450 Spring 2008 11

 T m dt

Test #1

Procedure

• Set Drag = 0 >> Assume No Atmosphere

• Calculate

V thrust

  T m dt for each stage, using the data from Ariane 4, Saturn V and Pegasus

3. Compare with the historical data.

Results

The calculated values matched with the historical data!!

(3-5 or more significant figures)

Special Thanks to Kevin & Mr. Tsohas for helping us

AAE 450 Spring 2008

Trajectory

12

Test #2

•Full

Atmosphere

•Exit

Pressure and

Exit Area were calculated.

Thrust in Vacuum Condition

Thrust in Sea Level Condition

AAE 450 Spring 2008

Trajectory

13

Backup

Slides

# of engines: 4

Ariane 4

1st Stage 2nd Stage 3rd Stage

Thrust

Isp

Sea Level

Vacuum

Sea Level

Vacuum

Pressure chamber

Nozzle Expansion Ratio (epsilon)

676.9

758.5

248.5

278.4

5.85

10.48

785

293.5

5.85

30.8

62.7

445.1

3.50

62.5

[kN]

[kN]

[s]

[s]

[MPa]

Special Thanks to Mr. Tsohas for providing the data

AAE 450 Spring 2008

Trajectory

14

Backup

Slides

Saturn V, First Stage

Thrust

Isp

Pressure

Nozzle Expansion Ratio

Sea Level

Vacuum

Sea Level

Vacuum chamber

(epsilon)

6,747.50

7,740.50

265

304

7.0

16

AAE 450 Spring 2008

Trajectory

[kN]

[kN]

[s]

[s]

[MPa]

15

Backup

Slides

 

1 

A

*

A e

 

1

2

1

 

1 

 p p e

0

1

1

1

1

 p p

0 e

1

Solve for

SL

 *

T A p

0

 p e and get p e p

0

2

2

1

 

1

1

1

1

 p p

0 e

1

1

2

  p e

 p a

 

A

*

Solve for A

* and get A e Special Thanks to D.Lattibeaudiere

for co-working on prop_test.m

AAE 450 Spring 2008

Trajectory

16

Backup

Slides

Test #1:

Delta_V_Thrust_Total

 Ariane 4: 10,120[m/s]

 Saturn V: 13,470 [m/s]

 Pegasus: 8,360 [m/s]

AAE 450 Spring 2008 17

Amanda Briden

2/28/08

APM, Trajectory Group

Ballistic Coefficient Analysis

‘measure of its ability to overcome air resistance in flight’ 1

AAE 450 Spring 2008 18

Ballistic Coefficient Definition

BC

 m

C

D

S where m - total mass

C

D

- drag coefficient f(M)

- calculated by Aerothermal solve_cd.m

S – reference area; stage diameter

Expect:

- Larger BC for more massive launch vehicles

10s vertical flight our region

AAE 450 Spring 2008

Trajectory

BC: Large Launch Vehicles transonic regime

M = 1.19 @ t = 70s out of atmosphere

19

BC: Sample MATs Launch Vehicles end of 1 st stage

S changes

Conclusions:

- Trends are as expected

- Our vehicle cannot easily overcome air resistance

Thank you to Jun Kanehara, Elizabeth Harkness, Alan Schwing, and Kevin Kloster for all of their help this week!

AAE 450 Spring 2008

Trajectory

20

Backup Slides

Future Work

 Optimize final design cases

 Write report

References:

1. "Ballistic coefficient." Wikipedia January 18, 2008 February 27, 2008

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballistic_coefficient>.

2. Longuski, Prof. J. "AAE 450 Spacecraft Design Lecture #6." Purdue University, West

Lafayette, IN.

3. Longuski, Prof. J. Ballistic Coefficient interview. February 20, 2008.

4. Kloster, Kevin. Ballistic Coefficient interview. February 20-27, 2008.

AAE 450 Spring 2008

Trajectory

21

Steering Angles Used In Analysis

Vehicle

Pegasus

Saturn V

Ariane 4

SB-HA-DA-DA

(8700 km/s)

Traj Ver 5.3

SG-SA-DT-DT

(9051 km/s)

Traj Ver 5.3

LG-SA-DT-DT

(10,000 km/s)

Traj Ver 5.3

Alt @ end of stage 1 (km)

94.43

109.75

57

194.09

71.44

56.44

mdot1 (kg/s)

206.136

13,360.24

1,112.19

6.847

14.208

18.391

tburn1 (s)

73

161

205

196.5

182.4

171.2

0

34 psi1e (deg)

87

87

87

-14

-10

-26 psi2e (deg)

-25

40

40

-20

-10

-26

Psi3e (deg)

-30

0

0

-20

AAE 450 Spring 2008

Trajectory

22

Download