Eric Nguyen
Jerica Candalla
Duane Gonzales
Matthew Wurst
Roman Troyano
David Allen
Founded by 2 Stanford computer scientists in
1984
1997 – First year in
Fortune 500
Brought public in 1990
Passed $100 billion in 14 years
Core focus is routers
TOP MANAGEMENT
Don Valentine, initial
VC for Cisco
Reserved right to bring in professional management
After 1990 IPO both founders sold their stock and left Cisco
BUSINESS STRATEGY
John Chambers became
CEO in1995 after coming from Wang
Laboratories in 1991
Plan with 4 elements:
Broad product line
Systematize acquisitions
Set industry wide software standards for networking
Pick the right partners
PETER SOLVIK
Came from Apple in
1993
Gave 2 key challenges
IT department was too traditional
Too internally oriented
CHANGES
IT reporting went to
Senior VP of customer advocacy
IT budget was returned to functions
Central IT steering committee was disbanded
Cisco’s legacy system failed in 1994
Shut down for 2 days
How should Cisco proceed?
Should they make adjustments and improve their current system?
Should they outsource to a different company?
Should they begin development of in-house software?
Why?
With such a large company, changes to the legacy system could potentially cripple their business structure. Did Cisco decide to implement changes one at a time or all at once?
And why?
Implementation wouldn’t be phased
Would be done all at once
No customization to make implementation a priority
VENDORS
10 days writing Request for Proposals
Given 2 weeks to respond
Invited in for 3 days to demonstrate software
Given sample data
Entire decision process took 75 days
Who are some of the vendors Cisco considered and why?
Oracle: stronger manufacturing capability, made long term development promises regarding functionality, flexibility offered by closeness
SAP AG: one of the largest business software companies
PeopleSoft, Inc. : HRMS, FMS, SCM, CRM, & EPM
J.D. Edwards & Co: OneWorld ERP system
QUESTIONS POSED
How much would it cost and how long would it take?
Original proposal was
15 months, then 5, but started in Q3 and wanted to be stable by
Q4
Officially committed 9 months and $15 million for the project
BOARD’S REACTION
Negative initial reactions
Board eventually approved the project.
Next step was to incorporate the internet
Would the strategy employed by Cisco at the time work successfully today?
Would such a budget and stringent timeline give trouble to a modern company?
INTERNET & EXTRANET
Began development in early ‘90s
Shifted from Mosaic to
Netscape browser
Cisco connection online
3 year investment
$115 million
$100M for web enablement
$15M for ERP
CISCO’S SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT
5 initiatives to automate
Single enterprise
Used networked apps
New product introduction
Automated process for gathering product data
Autotest
Inventory displayed in real time
“Global Networked
Business Model”
Extranet supply chain
Information transparency
Outsourced manufacturing
Customer self service through website
80+% tech support delivered electronically
Saved $506M annually
70% employees have a bonus multiplier that are attached to customer satisfaction surveys
Marketing through web
Net commerce through web
90% software upgrades via internet
Productivity gains of 60% for Cisco & 20% for customers
Any place access through the web
EIS & DSS
Executive & decision support, sales tracking & reporting went through the intranet
Employee self service
Cisco Employee
Connection (CEC)
Resources for 40k+ employees
Web browser interface
Collaboration & workflow management
Web-enabled legacy systems
Whose website format did Cisco have their intranet tailored to?
Communication & distance learning
Cisco tailored version of My Yahoo!
Used “push” technology
Strengthened culture
2/3 technology internally developed
1/3 from partnerships/ acquisitions
70% CEOs from acquired companies were retained at Cisco
Acquired companies for their R&D
Acquisitions integrated
60-100 days
KPMG ACQUISITION
Purchased ~20%
KPMG’s global consulting arm
1.05 Billion
KPMG ACQUISITION
KPMG retained 80% equity
Used capital to build 6 tech. centers
4K consultants for
Cisco’s clientele
KPMG was part of the decision process with
Oracle so it was only natural for the acquisition.
ACQUISITIONS
Focused on 3 pillars:
Build, buy, & partner
Growth strategizing on identifying and driving market transitions
Acquisitions are segmented into:
Market acceleration
Market expansion
New market entry
KEY ACQUISITIONS
1993 – Crescendo
Ethernet market entry
1999 – Monterey
Networks
Optical transport market entry
2003 – Linksys
Consumer networking
2005 – Scientific Atlanta
Set top boxes for Cable TV
2012 Litewire, Inc.
Optical interconnect tech.
CORE COMPETENCIES
Kept design and fulfillment throughout economic struggles until 2009
Set 30 core focuses to take advantage of new opportunities of other companies who were cutting back
2011 Cisco realized it wasn’t meant to be a consumer company
At the beginning of
2012, Cisco narrowed down their list of 30 to 5
INTRANET 2002-2006
Unified Intranet
Consistent UI
Unified navigation
Integrated enterprise news
Streamlined intranet development
Period enabled:
Informed workforce
Corporate communications
Efficiency
INTRANET 2006-2008
Collaboration tools
Democratizing publishing
Communication vehicles
Blogs
Personal
Project/Team
Executive
Discussion forums
Wikis
Enabling communication
& collaboration
INTRANET 2008-2011
Focused on personalization and customization
Integrated workforce experience
“Me” is the key focus
INTRANET 2011- PRESENT
New Work
Find projects & initiatives they want to work on advertized in a marketplace
Activities within workplace community
Flexibility & adaptability
My Cisco
Platform module
My Cisco pull down
My Cisco Workspace
Multiple access levels
EXTRANET
Accessible 24/7 for 83 countries
Training & Events
5 levels of IT certification
8 different paths
3 distinct markets
Enterprise
Small business
Home
Support
Product support
Downloads
Contact
Tools
Forums
Security Advisories
EXTRANET
Partners
Channel Partner Program
Resale channel
Managed services channel
Outsourcing channel
Cloud partner network
Global partner network
Where are the other competitors that Cisco was considering presently?
J.D. Edwards & Co. was purchased by PeopleSoft, Inc in 2003
PeopleSoft, Inc. was purchased by Oracle in 2005
SAP is currently one of the largest business software competitors and in the top 3 of highest revenue independent software provider.
If Cisco had decided to go with another company that was acquired by Oracle, would Oracle still consider providing support for the original implementation methods?
Or would they have Cisco convert all together?
What would be the reasoning behind each?
SAP VS. ORACLE: WHICH WOULD’VE BEEN THE
BETTER CHOICE?
SAP
Mostly in-house solutions
Enhancing core product offerings
Standardized
Leader in actual business benefits realized
Oracle
Solutions mostly presented through acquisitions
Moving toward Fusion middleware (OFM)
Flexible
20% cheaper
Highest satisfaction
(2008 study)
Should Cisco be moving towards SOA if they aren’t already?