Cisco Systems Architecture

advertisement

ERP and Web-enabled IT

Eric Nguyen

Jerica Candalla

Duane Gonzales

Matthew Wurst

Roman Troyano

David Allen

Founded by 2 Stanford computer scientists in

1984

1997 – First year in

Fortune 500

Brought public in 1990

Passed $100 billion in 14 years

Core focus is routers

TOP MANAGEMENT

Don Valentine, initial

VC for Cisco

Reserved right to bring in professional management

After 1990 IPO both founders sold their stock and left Cisco

BUSINESS STRATEGY

John Chambers became

CEO in1995 after coming from Wang

Laboratories in 1991

Plan with 4 elements:

Broad product line

Systematize acquisitions

Set industry wide software standards for networking

Pick the right partners

PETER SOLVIK

Came from Apple in

1993

Gave 2 key challenges

IT department was too traditional

Too internally oriented

CHANGES

IT reporting went to

Senior VP of customer advocacy

IT budget was returned to functions

Central IT steering committee was disbanded

Cisco’s legacy system failed in 1994

Shut down for 2 days

How should Cisco proceed?

Should they make adjustments and improve their current system?

Should they outsource to a different company?

Should they begin development of in-house software?

Why?

With such a large company, changes to the legacy system could potentially cripple their business structure. Did Cisco decide to implement changes one at a time or all at once?

And why?

Implementation wouldn’t be phased

Would be done all at once

No customization to make implementation a priority

VENDORS

10 days writing Request for Proposals

Given 2 weeks to respond

Invited in for 3 days to demonstrate software

Given sample data

Entire decision process took 75 days

Who are some of the vendors Cisco considered and why?

Oracle: stronger manufacturing capability, made long term development promises regarding functionality, flexibility offered by closeness

SAP AG: one of the largest business software companies

PeopleSoft, Inc. : HRMS, FMS, SCM, CRM, & EPM

J.D. Edwards & Co: OneWorld ERP system

QUESTIONS POSED

How much would it cost and how long would it take?

Original proposal was

15 months, then 5, but started in Q3 and wanted to be stable by

Q4

Officially committed 9 months and $15 million for the project

BOARD’S REACTION

Negative initial reactions

Board eventually approved the project.

Next step was to incorporate the internet

Would the strategy employed by Cisco at the time work successfully today?

Would such a budget and stringent timeline give trouble to a modern company?

INTERNET & EXTRANET

Began development in early ‘90s

Shifted from Mosaic to

Netscape browser

Cisco connection online

3 year investment

$115 million

$100M for web enablement

$15M for ERP

CISCO’S SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT

5 initiatives to automate

Single enterprise

Used networked apps

New product introduction

Automated process for gathering product data

Autotest

Inventory displayed in real time

“Global Networked

Business Model”

Extranet supply chain

Information transparency

Outsourced manufacturing

Customer self service through website

80+% tech support delivered electronically

Saved $506M annually

70% employees have a bonus multiplier that are attached to customer satisfaction surveys

Marketing through web

Net commerce through web

90% software upgrades via internet

Productivity gains of 60% for Cisco & 20% for customers

Any place access through the web

EIS & DSS

Executive & decision support, sales tracking & reporting went through the intranet

Employee self service

Cisco Employee

Connection (CEC)

Resources for 40k+ employees

Web browser interface

Collaboration & workflow management

Web-enabled legacy systems

Whose website format did Cisco have their intranet tailored to?

Communication & distance learning

Cisco tailored version of My Yahoo!

Used “push” technology

Strengthened culture

2/3 technology internally developed

1/3 from partnerships/ acquisitions

70% CEOs from acquired companies were retained at Cisco

Acquired companies for their R&D

Acquisitions integrated

60-100 days

KPMG ACQUISITION

Purchased ~20%

KPMG’s global consulting arm

1.05 Billion

KPMG ACQUISITION

KPMG retained 80% equity

Used capital to build 6 tech. centers

4K consultants for

Cisco’s clientele

KPMG was part of the decision process with

Oracle so it was only natural for the acquisition.

ACQUISITIONS

Focused on 3 pillars:

Build, buy, & partner

Growth strategizing on identifying and driving market transitions

Acquisitions are segmented into:

Market acceleration

Market expansion

New market entry

KEY ACQUISITIONS

1993 – Crescendo

Ethernet market entry

1999 – Monterey

Networks

Optical transport market entry

2003 – Linksys

Consumer networking

2005 – Scientific Atlanta

Set top boxes for Cable TV

2012 Litewire, Inc.

Optical interconnect tech.

CORE COMPETENCIES

Kept design and fulfillment throughout economic struggles until 2009

Set 30 core focuses to take advantage of new opportunities of other companies who were cutting back

2011 Cisco realized it wasn’t meant to be a consumer company

At the beginning of

2012, Cisco narrowed down their list of 30 to 5

INTRANET 2002-2006

Unified Intranet

Consistent UI

Unified navigation

Integrated enterprise news

Streamlined intranet development

Period enabled:

Informed workforce

Corporate communications

Efficiency

INTRANET 2006-2008

Collaboration tools

Democratizing publishing

Communication vehicles

Blogs

 Personal

 Project/Team

 Executive

Discussion forums

Wikis

Enabling communication

& collaboration

INTRANET 2008-2011

Focused on personalization and customization

Integrated workforce experience

“Me” is the key focus

INTRANET 2011- PRESENT

New Work

Find projects & initiatives they want to work on advertized in a marketplace

Activities within workplace community

Flexibility & adaptability

My Cisco

Platform module

My Cisco pull down

My Cisco Workspace

Multiple access levels

EXTRANET

Accessible 24/7 for 83 countries

Training & Events

5 levels of IT certification

8 different paths

3 distinct markets

Enterprise

Small business

Home

Support

Product support

Downloads

Contact

Tools

Forums

Security Advisories

EXTRANET

Partners

Channel Partner Program

Resale channel

Managed services channel

Outsourcing channel

Cloud partner network

Global partner network

Where are the other competitors that Cisco was considering presently?

J.D. Edwards & Co. was purchased by PeopleSoft, Inc in 2003

PeopleSoft, Inc. was purchased by Oracle in 2005

SAP is currently one of the largest business software competitors and in the top 3 of highest revenue independent software provider.

If Cisco had decided to go with another company that was acquired by Oracle, would Oracle still consider providing support for the original implementation methods?

Or would they have Cisco convert all together?

What would be the reasoning behind each?

SAP VS. ORACLE: WHICH WOULD’VE BEEN THE

BETTER CHOICE?

SAP

Mostly in-house solutions

Enhancing core product offerings

Standardized

Leader in actual business benefits realized

Oracle

Solutions mostly presented through acquisitions

Moving toward Fusion middleware (OFM)

Flexible

20% cheaper

Highest satisfaction

(2008 study)

Should Cisco be moving towards SOA if they aren’t already?

Download