EXAM - a Comprehensive Environment for the Analysis of Access

advertisement

Department of Computer Science

Access Control Policy

Combining & Comparison

• PCL: A Policy Combining Language

• EXAM: E nvironment for X acml policy

A nalysis & M anagement

Elisa Bertino, Ninghui Li

(Purdue University)

Department of Computer Science

Why Policy Combining?

• A policy may contain multiple subpolicies. The effect of the whole policy is determined by combining the effects of sub-policies

– Firewalls: first-applicable

– XACML: deny-overrides , permit-overrides , first-applicable , only-one-applicable

Department of Computer Science

Other Useful Combining

Algorithms

• Weak-consensus :

• Strong-consensus :

• Weak-majority :

• Strong-majority:

Department of Computer Science

Our Goal

An expressive and practical language for specifying policy combining algorithms

Our solution: PCL

NINGHUI LI, ELISA BERTINO,

QIHUA WANG, WAHBEH QADARJI

Purdue University

Department of Computer Science

Overview of PCL

• Uses four values : Σ = {P, D, NA, IN}

• Evaluation errors are represented by non-empty subsets of {P, D, NA, IN}

– 15 possible values

• Two ways to specify policy combining behavior

– Using a Policy Combining Operator (PCO)

– Using linear constraints

Department of Computer Science

Policy Combining Operators

• Policy combining operator (PCO)

– is a PCA that combines two policies (or rules)

– g: Σ × Σ -> Σ, where Σ = {P, D, NA, IN}

• A PCO can be represented as a matrix

P1 \ P2 P D NA IN P1 \ P2 P D NA IN

P P D P D P

D D D D D D

P

D

P

D

P

D

P

D

NA

IN

P

D

D

D

NA

D

D

D

NA

IN

P

IN

D

IN

NA

IN

IN

IN

Deny-overrides

First-applicable

Department of Computer Science

From PCO to PCA

• PCA should be a function Σ + -> Σ

• Given a PCO g , its recursive PCA is the function f :

– f(P

1

) = P

1

– f(P

1

, P

2

) = g(P

1

, P

2

)

– f(P

1

,…,P n

) = g(f(P

1

,…,P n-1

), P n

)

• DFA-representation of policy evaluation

Any Any

Deny-overrides First-applicable

D D

P, NA Any

D, IN Any

Any

P D, IN

IN P IN

D

P P IN

NA NA

NA NA

Department of Computer Science

Using Linear Constraints

• PCOs cannot express counting-based strategies.

• Second approach for PCA specification uses linear constraints on the number of subpolicies that return P, D, NA, and IN.

– A Linear Constraint is an expressions that uses

#P, #D, #NA, #IN, addition/subtraction, comparisons, and AND

 and OR

Department of Computer Science

Other Issues We Considered

• Optimized evaluation of PCAs

• Specify how to specify obligationhandling behavior in a PCA

Department of Computer Science

Expressive Power: There are

Examples for each numbered area

Department of Computer Science

Using PCL in XACML

• An XACML Policy can include the PCA it wants to use

• A PDP that understands PCL can parse and understand all PCAs specified in it

– makes deployment of new PCAs feasible

Department of Computer Science

Implementation

• We implemented PCL and integrated it with

Sun’s implementation for XACML 1.1

• Changes and additions were made to several classes and the Result class in particular to account for errors in evaluation

Department of Computer Science

EXAM

Environment for Xacml policy Analysis & Management

EXAM is a comprehensive environment for analyzing and managing

XACML access control policies. It supports acquisition, editing and retrieval of policies in addition to policy similarity filtering, policy similarity analysis and policy integration.

ELISA BERTINO, NINGHUI LI, GABRIEL GHINITA, PRATHIMA RAO

Purdue University

Department of Computer Science

EXAM Overview: Architecture

User User

User

User Interface

Query Dispatcher

Policy

Annotation

Policy

Similarity

Filter

Policy

Repository

Policy Similarity

Analyzer

Policy

Integration

Framework

Department of Computer Science

Key Feature –

Policy Similarity Analysis

• Goal

– Characterize the relationships among the sets of requests respectively authorized by a set of policies.

• Two techniques

– Policy Similarity Filter

• Less precise, faster (based on techniques from document matching techniques)

– Policy Similarity Analyzer

• Precise, slower (based on MTDBB)

• A visualization environment has been developed to visualize policy similarity results

Action Type

Department of Computer Science

Multi-level Grid Visualization of Policy Similarity p3

<Time

[9am,1am]> p4

<Time

[1am,9am]>

Department of Computer Science

Policy Integration

• A Fine-grained Integration Algebra (FIA)

– 3-valued (Permit, Deny, NotApplicable)

– Specify behavior at the granularity of requests and effects

– Restrict domain of applicability

– Support expressive policy languages like XACML

• Framework for specifying integration constraints and generating integrated policies.

– MTBDD based implementation of FIA

– Generation of integrated policy in XACML syntax.

Department of Computer Science

Fine-grained Integration Algebra (FIA)

Vocabulary of attribute names and domains

Policy constants

Permit policy

Deny policy

Binary operators

Addition

Intersection

Unary operators

Negation

Domain Projection

Department of Computer Science

FIA - Theoretical Results

• Expressivity

– FIA can express all XACML policy combining algorithms

– FIA can express policy “jumps”

– FIA can model closed policies and open policies

• Completeness

– A completeness notion has been developed, based on the concept of policy combination matrix , and FIA is complete with respect to such notion

• Minimality

– Identification of the minimal complete subsets of the FIA operators

Department of Computer Science

Current Status of EXAM

• A prototype has been completed that includes the similarity filter and analyzer

• The visualization tool has been completed

• We expect to release EXAM to the project team in December 2009

Department of Computer Science

On-Going Work

• Study the specification and analysis of stateful policies in a practical way

– e.g., by extending XACML

• User experimental study – the goal is to assess whether the similarity filter is a good predictor for policy similarity as perceived by users

• Extend EXAM with tools for synonym and dictionary management, and ontologies

• Develop tools for collaborative privacy-preserving policy enforcement

Download