River Restoration Steering Committee Final Report City Commission – Committee of the Whole July 28, 2015 Background/Context 2011 - City Commission adopts Green Grand Rapids Master Plan • It is recommended that the City “pursue river and stream restoration” and “capitalize on the Grand River as an asset for economic development and quality of life by encouraging a change in land use along the riverfront” 2012 - Grand Rapids WhiteWater (GRWW) visioning continues • Chris Muller and Chip Richards continue the work to create the vision, actively study, plan, and design particular aspects of the river 2013 – Grand River Restoration Project receives Urban Federal Waters Partnership Designation • Fourteen Federal Agencies join to bring expertise and resources 2014 – GRWW, City and DGRI launch GRForward Downtown and River Corridor process to continue the visioning • Three steering committees appointed to guide the process: River Restoration, River Corridor and Downtown • Robust Community Engagement process held in 2014/2015 2015 – GRForward vison process moving into implementation phase • Vision document in draft form; will include action plan for implementation with short, medium and long term goals • Approval of plan anticipated in fall ’15 • Some implementation already begun; grants, acquisition, development, permit applications 2 July 22, 2012 River Restoration Committee Members • Vicki Anthes, Planning Section Chief, Michigan Department of Natural Resources • Patty Birkholz, West Michigan Director, Michigan League of Conservation Voters and West Michigan Environmental Leadership Network • Steve Faber, Byrum & Fisk Communications • George Heartwell, Mayor, City of Grand Rapids • John Helmholdt, Executive Director of Communications & External Affairs, Grand Rapids Public Schools • Scott Hicks, Field Office Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service • James Moyer, Associate Vice President for Facilities Planning, Grand Valley State University • Chris Muller, Co-Founder, Grand Rapids Whitewater • Nkatha Mwenda, Student, Grand Rapids Public Schools • Larry Romanelli, Ogema (Chief), Little River Band of Ottawa Indians • Rodney Stokes, Special Advisor, Office of Governor Rick Snyder • Greg Sundstrom, City Manager, City of Grand Rapids • Mary Swanson, Assistant Administrator, Kent County • Ryan Huppert, Assistant Principal, Grand Rapids Public Schools • Rick Truer, City of Grand Rapids Planning Commission • Fred Keller, Founder and CEO, Cascade Engineering, CoChair July 22, 2012 • Megan Lemmen, Student, Grand Valley State University • Rachel Hood, Executive Director, West Michigan Environmental Action Council • Joe Jones, President and CEO, Grand Rapids Urban League, Co-Chair 3 • Kris Larson, President and CEO, Downtown Grand Rapids, Inc. • Jim Talen, County Commissioner, Kent County • Kristian Williams, Resource Conservationist, U.S. Natural Resources Conservation Service Steering Committee Charge and Tasks Charge: • Provide overall guidance on efforts associated with the restoration of the Grand River and riverbank; • Assure a common vision that advances broad and diverse community interests and the effective alignment of various projects related to river restoration; • Serve as a resource to advise the City Commission regarding the GRWW plan, permits, funding, project staging, construction, maintenance, and operations of any projects associated with the Grand River. Tasks: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 4 July 22, 2012 Develop guiding principles by which to consider and evaluate recommendations; The principles shall take into account the environment, the economy and social equity; Monitor the progress, coordination and alignment between the Restoration Plan, Downtown Plan and River Corridor Plan; Cultivate and inspire widespread participation and support of the project; Advocate for resources on the Federal, State and regional levels; Explore potential organizational models and processes for the long-term operation, management and programming of river improvements; Ensure annual reporting on progress/outcomes is available to citizens. Task 1 Develop guiding principles by which to consider and evaluate recommendations; The principles shall take into account the environment, the economy and social equity; Guiding Principles • Recognize that the Grand River belongs to everyone and contributes to our quality of life. • The Grand River as it flows through Grand Rapids is part of a watershed that has regional implications. • Every action should improve the ecological condition of the watershed and be an exemplar for others. • Seek to balance human interaction, commercial investment, and environmental considerations. • Consider future generations by ensuring that actions are sustainably designed, well-managed, responsibly assessed, continuously evaluated, and corrective action taken as necessary. • Preserve and restore habitat for desirable species and deter invasive species. • Direct and develop the capacity and resources (people, organizations, and finances) necessary to enhance all human and natural habitats. • Encourage innovation, the leveraging of resources, and shared accountability by engaging residents, businesses, government, education, philanthropy, and non-governmental organizations. • Celebrate our history and cultural diversity. • Ensure that future development of the river and its edges contributes to the local economy by creating wide-ranging investment, recreation, and employment opportunities for all. • Develop the programming of places and activities to be accessible and safe for everyone; being mindful of social and/or physical barriers. • Use intentionally inclusive and transparent decision-making to foster ownership of a re-imagined Grand River watershed that serves as a beacon for civic identity. 6 July 22, 2012 Task 2 Monitor the progress, coordination and alignment between plans 7 July 22, 2012 • Eleven River Restoration Steering Committee Meetings • Fourteen River Corridor Steering Committee Meetings • Twelve Downtown Steering Committee Meetings • Committee updates provided at each meeting • Good coordination between consultants 8 July 22, 2012 Task 3 Cultivate and inspire widespread participation and support of the project; 9 July 22, 2012 • GRFoward has engaged over 3,300 people • Two public forums with over 200 attendees total • Open house with 450 visitors • 24 meetings in the neighborhoods • Dozens of meetings in the region with government and other interest groups • Over 31,000 website views • Over 1,100 Facebook likes • 250 Instagram followers • 290 Twitter followers 10 July 22, 2012 Task 4 Advocate for resources on the Federal, State and regional levels; Grants Applications in Progress • Healing Our Waters – Assistance in Developing a GLRI proposal • Consumers Energy - Education • NRCS Regional Conservation Partnership Program – conservation assistance to producers and landowners Submitted/Waiting Decision • National Fish and Wildlife Foundation – Sustain Our Great Lakes Full Application - River Habitat Restoration • Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund – Land Acquisition • HUD – National Disaster Resiliency Competition submitted by the State Received/Underway • United States Fish and Wildlife Service – Fish Passage Grant • Michigan Department of Transportation, Monroe North TIFA, Michigan Trails and Greenways Coalition – River Edge Construction • National Park Service – Technical Assistance Grant for Organizational Models • United States Army Corp of Engineers – Great Lakes Fishery and Ecosystem Restoration – Adjustable Barrier • Healing Our Waters - Mussel Report 12 July 22, 2012 Task 5 Explore potential organizational models and processes for the long-term operation, management and programming of river improvements; Two Work Groups formed: • Organizational Models • Water Quality 14 July 22, 2012 Footer text here Organizational Models Work Group • Eric DeLong, City of Grand Rapids • Steve Faber, Friends of Grand Rapids Parks • Rachel Hood/Elaine Sterrett-Isely, WMEAC • Kris Larson, DGRI • David Marquardt, City of Grand Rapids • Chris Muller, Grand Rapids Whitewater • Barbara Nelson-Jameson, National Park Service • Kalie Nye, Grand Rapids Whitewater • Wendy Ogilvie, Grand Valley Metro Council • Suzanne Schulz, City of Grand Rapids • Jay Steffen, City of Grand Rapids • Mark Van Putten, representing the Wege Foundation 15 July 22, 2012 Interviews • Detroit Riverfront Conservancy • Atlanta – Proctor Creek (UWFP Project) • Pittsburgh – River of Steel (Nat’l Heritage Area) • Cleveland -- Ohio & Erie Canalway Coalition (Nat’l Heritage Area) • Memphis Riverfront Development Corporation • LIAA – Recreational Authorities under Michigan Law • Ottawa County Parks & Recreation Commission • Traverse City/Garfield Township Recreational Authority • National Land/Park Conservancies • Trust for Public Land • Conservation Fund 16 July 22, 2012 Statement of Work – Requesting letters of Interest to: • Help evaluate and, if appropriate, lead the creation of a new conservancy-like organization and, if appropriate, a complementary “recreational authority” pursuant to Michigan law • Provide interim fundraising, fiscal stewardship and fiscal agency roles • Provide project management, especially with respect to the rapids restoration project • As appropriate, provide transitional support and leadership over 2-5 years developing a new conservancy-like organization’s and recreational authority’s capabilities 17 July 22, 2012 • Designate successor to Steering Committee for transitional role to conservancy-like organization • Arrange for transitional staffing and functions, potentially from Trust for Public Land Recommendation #1 18 July 22, 2012 • Develop conservancy-like organization to provide/coordinate: Fundraising Project management Accountability Public Outreach Programming Operations, maintenance and sustainable financing of facilities, structures and certain river corridor sites/amenities Current Organizational Infrastructure & Process City of Grand Rapids River Restoration Steering Committee Grand Rapids Whitewater River Corridor Committee GRForward Downtown & River Corridor Vision & Design Process – September 2015 through June 2015 19 July 22, 2012 Project Implementation (June 2017 – forward) Interim Organizational Structure City of Grand Rapids New NGO or Local Project Manager Grand River Corridor Revitalization Committee (appointed by GR City Commission) Operations Support Team (incl. designed TPL staff) Board Recruitment Cooperating Regional Governments Recreational Authority Fundraising Committee River Corridor Development Corporation Environmental Stewardship Advisory Committee Outreach & Programming Advisory Committee Rapids Project Advisory Committee Project Management for ‘Wet’ Implementation and Strategic Planning for Finance, Capital Investments, Maintenance, Programming & Partnerships – June 2015 – June 2017 20 July 22, 2012 Corridor Projects Advisory Committee Project Implementation, Operations Finance, Capital Investments & Maintenance, Programming & Partnerships – June 2017, Forward Best Practices for Outreach & Coordination • Continuous and inclusive refinement of River restoration vision essential Recommendation #2a • Proactive public engagement including strong efforts to more fully engage communities of color and historically disadvantaged communities • Ongoing outreach to near-by private property owners and economic development leaders • Constant coordination and mutually supportive relationship with City staff 21 July 22, 2012 Best Practices for Governance & Board Directors Composition • Government representation, but not control • Participation by acknowledged community & business leaders Recommendation #2b • Focus on accountability and fundraising assistance • Directors independent of organizational representation roles • Regional perspective (downstream/upstream/neighborhoods) • Interlocking representation with recreational authority (if created) 22 July 22, 2012 Best Practices for Integration of Local Expertise Recommendation #2c • Assess and develop local expertise and leadership • Partner with local NGOs and professionals for programming and implementation • Non governance role for programming partners 23 July 22, 2012 Explore Long-Term Financing Options Recommendation #3 • “Recreational authority” under Michigan Recreational Authorities Act • Business relationships • Improvement district • Other financing mechanisms • Coordination with City parks millage & financing priorities 24 July 22, 2012 Potential partnership with TPL • National not-for-profit organization • Completed more than 5,200 park and conservation projects, protecting more than 3 million acres Recommendation #4 • Experience working with public-private partnerships on urban parks, green space and trails projects • Worked with several cities on water-oriented urban greenway projects, including in Atlanta, Chattanooga, Pittsburgh, Newark, Minneapolis and Memphis • Conducted GR site visit in January 2015 25 July 22, 2012 Explore MOU with TPL to address: • Reporting/accountability structure • Integration and sequencing of “wet” and “dry” projects and TPL’s role • Short- and long-term tasks concerning which TPL would likely add significant value, e.g.: Assessing capacities of local professionals and organizations Developing a strategy and timetable for conservancy-like organization Serving as fiscal agent and fiduciary for funds for specific projects Recommendation #4 Developing and coordinating fundraising strategy Coordinating with the City and key partners in applying for permits and project management • Development of initial budget (including potential philanthropic funding sources) • Time and cost associated with “onboarding” TPL • TPL’s proposed staffing, including consultations on personnel decisions 26 July 22, 2012 Water Quality Work Group • Scott Hicks, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service • Rachel Hood, West Michigan Environmental Action Council • Mike Lunn, City of Grand Rapids, Environmental Services Department • Kalie Nye, Grand Rapids Whitewater • Nick Occhipinti, West Michigan Environmental Action Council • Wendy Ogilvie, Grand Valley Metro Council, Lower Grand River Organization of Watersheds • Eric Pessell, Kent County Health Department • Dana Strouse, State of Michigan, Department of Environmental Quality • Jim Talen, Kent County Commissioner • Kristian Williams, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service 27 July 22, 2012 Recommendation #1 28 July 22, 2012 The notion of improving the quality of the water in the Grand River should be imbedded in the messaging, branding and funding initiatives of the river restoration effort. Responsibility for monitoring progress on the recommendations should become part of the work of the entity that takes on oversight and coordination of the next phase of the project. Recommendation #2 29 July 22, 2012 Address high impact point-source water quality infrastructure opportunities in the Grand River watershed area. Recommendation #3 30 July 22, 2012 Address livestock and cropland pathogen pollutants in the Direct Drainage Subwatershed management unit of the Lower Grand River Watershed and in the Urban Waters Federal Partnership area. Plant buffer and filter strips along priority acreage adjacent to and encompassing the Direct Drainage Subwatershed and Urban Waters Federal Partnership area. Recommendation #4 31 July 22, 2012 Improve septic programs and policies in the Grand River watershed area. Work with the Governor's Administration on a statewide septic code and with local health departments to adopt operational inspections and maintenance requirements in their septic regulations. Recommendation #5 32 July 22, 2012 Maximize implementation of green infrastructure and low-impact development (LID) within the River Restoration Project Corridor area by encouraging local policies and incentives that favor LID. Recommendation #6 33 July 22, 2012 Implement projects identified by the City of Grand Rapids Green Infrastructure Opportunity Assessment. Inspire a similar assessment and implementation process for managing stormwater runoff in upstream communities. Summary • The River Restoration Steering Committee has played a vital role in assuring coordination between river restoration and the GRForward visioning process for the downtown and river corridor. Recommendations • The City Commission should authorize a transitional role for a successor to this Steering Committee = Grand River Corridor Revitalization Committee (GRCRC) is proposed; • Work with key partners including the City of Grand Rapids and Grand Rapids Whitewater to develop a Memorandum of Understanding with Trust for Public Land (TPL) by which (with private philanthropic funding) would provide support to the Grand River Corridor Revitalization Committee; • The Grand River Corridor Revitalization Committee, supported by TPL, should explore the formation of a future “conservancy-like” organization to operate, maintain and sustain the improvements in the river and on the banks; • On a parallel track, the GRCRC should explore the formation of a complementary “recreational authority” like organization under Michigan law (with inclusion of key government jurisdictions upstream and downstream from Grand Rapids) and/or of potential “improvement districts” and similar funding mechanisms; • The Grand River Corridor Revitalization Committee and any subsequent entity or entities managing the oversight and coordination of the river corridor projects, must work in partnership with others to closely monitor water quality and support both regional and local efforts to minimize pollutants to the Grand River. 34 July 22, 2012 Questions & Answers