Case Study of a Turnaround Anthony Macari Clinical Assistant Professor of Finance and Owner of ExplainFinance.net September 20, 2011 What we will cover Introduction Turnaround process Guiding Principles Lessons Learned Major Mistakes Case Study Questions BACKGROUND Education: Emery Worldwide, PepsiCo, Kiewit Continental - 1981-1988 Various Finance/Planning/Acquisitions positions Fortune Brands – 1988-1999 University of Connecticut – BA, MBA Pace Law School–JD Director of Planning and Director of Business Development-focus on Strategic Planning, Acquisitions, Divestitures Sacred Heart University-2000-2003, 2008-Present New York University-2003-2006 Clinical Asst. Professor of Finance and Director of Welch MBA Program Assistant Dean of Business and Legal Studies at NYU Consulting work with for-profit Education Clients included SchoolNet, Cardean Learning Group, Lehman Brothers ExplainFinance.net ExplainFinance.net Provide financial training/coaching to non-financial employees and executives More cost-effective than seminars Can be customized by company or function (human resources, operations, marketing, etc.) in order to focus on what is most relevant to the group Thanks to Mark Bonney Mark is the EVP and CFO for Direct Brands and has permitted me to use a number of his slides outlining the turnaround process. His affiliations include: Board of Directors American Bank Note Holographics, Inc. (NASDAQ) Audit Committee Chair; Compensation Committee Axsys Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ) ThreeCore Inc. (Venture funded start-up) Community Health Centers, Inc. (Non-profit) Chairman of the Board; Audit and Finance Committee; Compensation Committee; Executive Committee Turnaround Process Fix – Find what is broken and fix it Re-Margin – restructure, revise business processes, renegotiate and retool IT to lower fixed and variable costs Grow – look for the “Blue Ocean” growth opportunity early but fix and remargin first so growth is profitable Fortune Brands Tobacco, Spirits, Golf Office Products Home Improvement (Moen, Mlock, Cabinets) Office Products and Home Improvement combined some low margin businesses in consolidating industries Guiding Principles People will watch your every move! Be respectful of everyone. Work harder than anyone. Be visible. Be accessible. Talk with people about their lives not just their work. Communicate and cascade appropriately. Expression needs to match words. Base decisions on facts and data. Decide quickly. Good results come from your Team’s efforts. Bad results come from bad decisions…don’t be afraid to say that you made a mistake…makes you human…earns respect. Managing up is as important as managing across and down. It’s not “just business”. It is about people and the relationships that form and maintain that will define you. Enjoy the ride and have fun. Lessons Learned Before you join. Can the business be saved? I look for three things: CEO with strong skills in the critical area. Brand reputation. People that will execute. Also good if there is an obvious source of CASH. Lessons Learned You have six months: Day 1: Communicate the seriousness of the situation and take control of CASH processes Day 2: Understand why performance is bad Day 3: Find the enablers Bad is a relative term History is more important than you think Change is harder than you think Always think in terms of FIX, Re-Margin, then GROW! Major mistakes Impatience while learning Firing too fast Firing too slow Not respecting history Giving history too much credence Over-achieving Not managing upward Case Study-Profile • • • • • • • Highly educated work force Significant licensure requirements Strong pricing-well above inflation rates Strong demand profile worldwide Highly fragmented Product quality inconsistent Consumer profile varies Case Study-Profile Considerable debate on whether industry or individual providers need to be fixed Definition of product quality and basic success metrics unclear The Education Industry K-12 Community Colleges Regional Colleges State Universities Elite Universities A Few Myths • • • Just need business expertise Gates Foundation Mike Milken Foundation Mike Bloomberg Just need more money Technology will solve the problem Educational Governance At the college level, the “inmates” do run the asylum, with mixed impact Personal agendas vs. optimal solution Project management vs. academic integrity Input is considered a “right” Similar to local non-profit Boards The “Corporate “ Culture 20% are truly outstanding 60% are competent and want to do the right thing 10% are not competent 10% are very high maintenance Real gap between faculty and “corporate/administrative” functions What is “Good” Education Before understand why performance is bad, need to define “good” performance Is it achievement on standardized exams? Is it getting a job? Good teacher evaluations? Assurance of learning? Is it development of the total person (soft skills, dorm life, athletics) For Profit Education Lower teaching costs ($1.5k vs $25k) Leverage technology Marketing and customer service Rubric based grading and assessment Marketability of degree Quality debate More typical corporate structure Back to Mark’s Points Can the “business” be saved? Can it be fixed like any other business or is there a different model? Questions