CONTINUUM SOLVATION MODELS IN GAUSSIAN 03 Dr. Ivan Rostov Australian National University, Canberra E-mail: Ivan.Rostov@anu.edu.au OUTLINE Types of solvent effects and solvent models Overview of solvation continuum models available in Gaussian 03. Summary of Gaussian keywords Applications Recommendations 2 SOLVENT EFFECTS Nicolai Alexandrovich Menshutkin, Z. Physik. Chem. 1890, 5, 589 NH3 CH3Cl NH3CH3+ Cl- 3 SOLVENT EFFECTS The solvent environment influences all of these: Structure Energies Reaction and activation energies Bond energies Spectra Rotational (Microwave) Vibrational (IR, Raman) Electronic (UV, visible) 4 METHODS FOR TREATMENT OF SOLVATION Supermolecule Molecular Mechanics Force Fields Solute and some number of solvent molecules are included in one large QM calculation Simple classical force fields allows us to include a large number of solvent molecules Continuum models Explicit consideration of solvent molecules is neglected Solvent effects are described in terms of macroscopic properties of the chosen solvent (e, <Rsolvent>) Hybrid/mixed: Supermolecule + Continuum model QM + MM QM + MM + Continuum model 5 SOLVATION PROCESS disp.-rep. FiN 1) Creation of cavity 2) Turning on dispersion and repulsion forces disp.-rep. elec FiN FiN 3) Turning on electrostatic forces U solv U cav U disp.- rep. U elec. 6 BASICS OF THE CONTINUUM MODEL THEORY Solvent is described in terms of macroscopic properties Solvent is dielectric medium (uniform, normally), characterized by the dielectric constant e0 Polarization of solvent is expressed in terms of the surface charge density on the cavity surface Polarization produces the electric field in the cavity making an effect on solute Dispersion-Repulsion and Cavitation are added separately, or ignored 7 THE ELECTROSTATIC PROBLEM Poisson equations r Vi - 4 2 r Ve 0 with boundary conditions on S: in out in e out e= 1 n S n e= e0 Solution is calculated as (r) d r 3 V (r) r - r d r 2 S (r) r - r 8 BORN MODEL A single charge inside a spherical cavity No constructing of the cavity surface elements, because the Poisson equation is solved analytically 1 Q2 U solv -1 - e0 R 9 ONSAGER MODEL Spherical cavity μ2 e 0 -1 E H- 3 R 2e 0 1 Dipolar reaction field No constructing of the cavity surface elements, because the Poisson equation is solved analytically Keywords in Gaussian: SCRF(Dipole,A0=value,Dielectric=value) Area of applicability: Solute shape is close to spherical Solute is polar (m >> 0) References L. Onsager, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 58, 1486 (1936). M. Wong, M. Frisch, K. Wiberg, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113, 4476 (1991). 10 POLARIZED CONTINUUM MODEL (PCM) Realistic molecular shape of the cavity (interlocking spheres around each atom or group, or isodensity surface) Induced surface charges represent solvent polarization Includes free energy contributions from forming the cavity and dispersion-repulsion Comes in number of “flavours”: IEFPCM, CPCM, DPCM, IPCM, or SCIPCM Keywords in Gaussian: SCRF(Solvent=, PCM specific options) References: E. Canses, B. Mennucci, J. Tomasi, J. Chem Phys. 107, 3032 (1997). J. Tomasi, M. Persico, Chem. Rev. 94,2027 (1994). J. Tomasi, B. Mennucci, R. Camm, Chem. Rev. 105, 2999 (2005). 11 PCM, THE CAVITY CONSTRUCTION Interlocking spheres around atomic groups Interlocking spheres around each atom This is default in Gaussian 03 A choice of united atoms radii set, RADII=UAO (default), UAHF, UAKS, or UFF Radii=Pauling (or Bondi) Requires the scaling factor ALPHA by which the sphere radius is multiplied. The default value is 1.0 though should be 1.2 A number of keywords is provided to add extraspheres when necessary A number of keyword is provided to govern the size and number of surface elements (tesserae) 12 PCM, THE CAVITY VIEW Keyword: GeomView Creates files in GeomView format to visualize the cavity construction and the charge distribution on the cavity: tesserae.off charge.off Files are readable by GeomView, JavaView and other visualization software. (C5NH12+) 13 PCM, METHODS OF SOLVING OF THE SCRF PROBLEM TO CALCULATE SURFACE CHARGES 3 1 1 2 r d r r 2 r d r Iterative n ( r ) r r n ( r ) r r V S Keyword: ITERATIVE q Solves the PCM electrostatic problem r i Si through a linear scaling iterative method using a Jacobi-like scheme Advantageous when memory is limited. 1 r f0 Inversion Keyword: INVERSION ˆ -1 (r, r ' )Vˆ (r, r' ) (r ) r D Solve the PCM electrostatic problem to calculate polarization charges through the inversion matrix D with dimension of NtesxNtes Gaussian 03 uses Inversion by default. 14 DIELECTRIC PCM The original version of PCM Electrostatics directly from the cavity model Charges produces by discontinuity in the electric field across the boundary created by the cavity Very sensitive to solute charge outside the cavity Only single point calculations No longer recommended 15 INTEGRAL EQUATION FORMALISM PCM (IEFPCM) Default in Gaussian 03 Less sensitive to diffuse solute charge distributions PCM + careful outlying charge corrections => IEFPCM 16 CPCM (COSMO) Uses the assumption that the cavity surface to be conductor-like This assumption simplifies the solution of Poisson equation and calculation of the surface charges Results can be outputted in COSMO RS format Not recommended for solvents with low polarity It is more efficient in iterative regime 17 ISODENSITY PCM (IPCM) AND SELF-CONSISTENT ISODENSITY PCM (SCIPCM) Cavity formed using gas-phase static electronic isodensity surface (IPCM) Self-Consistent Isodensity (SCIPCM) Less arbitrary than spheres on atoms Cavity changes with electron density and environment The default density value is 0.0004 only single point calculations iterations are folded in SCF issues regarding scaling of charges still remain References J. Foresman, T.Keith, K. Wiberg, J. Snoonian, M. Frisch, J. Phys. Chem. 100,16098 (1996). 18 GAUSSIAN 03 KEYWORD EXAMPLES SCRF(Dipole,A0=5.5,eps=78.39) SCRF(IEFPCM) is the same as SCRF(PCM), or just SCRF SCRF(CPCM,Solvent=THF,Read) SCRF(IPCM) SCRF(SCIPCM) 19 SAMPLE INPUT FOR PCM CALCULATIONS %chk=pip-pcm #P HF/6-31g(d) SCRF(PCM,Solvent=Water,Read) test Piperidinium cation 1 1 N C C C C C H H H H H H H H H H H H 1 2 3 1 4 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 1.50977268 1.52365511 1.53136665 1.50978576 1.53134037 1.00969298 1.01028619 1.08151743 1.08069845 1.08732966 1.08342937 1.08661607 1.08269752 1.08069728 1.08151732 1.08732304 1.08344075 PCMDOC ITERATIVE GEOMVIEW 1 2 2 3 5 5 1 1 2 2 3 3 1 1 4 4 109.63925419 111.56508108 113.42079276 110.99585756 109.64667654 109.06107319 106.09798567 107.09512052 109.45874935 107.81444282 109.70973952 109.4557835 107.09836585 106.09918524 110.31444998 110.90163383 1 3 2 6 6 5 5 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 PCM solvation is requested. Solvent is Water. Additional PCM specific keywords are provided -55.04631728 57.07092348 54.90811126 -179.99768911 64.67690355 -64.03241054 179.68520816 67.33780856 -177.04873713 -66.50424273 176.38517116 -179.68240007 64.03563496 66.98445589 -175.10999479 PCM specific keywords 20 SAMPLE OUTPUT SCF Done: E(RHF) = -250.669391936 A.U. after 6 cycles Convg = 0.7269D-05 -V/T = 2.0012 S**2 = 0.0000 -------------------------------------------------------------Variational PCM results ======================= <psi(f)| H |psi(f)> (a.u.) = -250.570493 <psi(f)|H+V(f)/2|psi(f)> (a.u.) = -250.669392 Total free energy in solution: with all non electrostatic terms (a.u.) = -250.662541 -------------------------------------------------------------(Polarized solute)-Solvent (kcal/mol) = -62.06 -------------------------------------------------------------Cavitation energy (kcal/mol) = 16.10 Dispersion energy (kcal/mol) = -12.61 Repulsion energy (kcal/mol) = 0.81 Total non electrostatic (kcal/mol) = 4.30 -------------------------------------------------------------- 21 APPLICATIONS 22 + (C5NH12 ), PIPEREDIN CATION FREE ENERGY OF HYDRATION QM: HF/6-31G(d) Method PCM cavity was constructed of 1006 tesserae Gsolv, kcal/mol SP SCRF(Dipole,A0=5.5) -30.6 SP SCRF(PCM) -56.0 SP SCRF(CPCM) -56.1 SP SCRF(IPCM) -59.4 SP SCRF(SCIPCM) -60.9 Opt SCRF(PCM) -56.3 Opt SCRF(CPCM) -56.4 Opt SCRF(SCIPCM) -61.1 Experiment -60.0 Dipole, IPCM and SCIPCM results includes electrostatic effects only, sum of non-electrostatic is + 4.3 kcal/mol (PCM). 23 ET SYSTEM Donor = 4-Biphenyl e- Acceptor = 2-Naphthyl D-SA → DSA- Spacer: 5-a-androstane 24 ET SYSTEM ET system - - D SA → DSA D: 4-Biphenyl A: 2-Naphthyl S:5-a-androstane 87 atoms in total, 5158 tesserae created ROHF/6-31G(d,p) SP SCRF(IEFPCM, Solvent=THF) Method to solve surface charges Matrix inversion (default) Iterative Memory,M b CPUs Time, min. 240 1 92.5 640 1 32 800 1 31 1600 1 30 1600 4 22 64 1 28 640 1 29 800 1 27 1600 1 29 400 4 17.5 25 ET SYSTEM - - D SA → DSA D: 4-Biphenyl A: 2-Naphthyl S:5-a-androstane 87 atoms in total, 5158 tesserae created ROHF/6-31G(d,p) SP SCRF(СPCM, Solvent=THF) Method to solve surface charges Matrix inversion (default) Iterative Memory,M b CPUs Time, min. 240 1 29 640 1 29 800 1 28 1600 1 28 1600 4 19 64 1 16 640 1 16 800 1 16 1600 1 16 800 4 5.75 26 ET SYSTEM • In vacuo ROHF and UHF calculations fails to produce the precursor state. Altering of MOs does not help. • Polarization field of solvent makes it possible to obtain solution (with solvent polarization effects included!) for both precursor and successor states • G = -7.7 kcal/mol (IEFPCM) using guess=alter option and altering order of HOMO and LUMO • G = -9.6 kcal/mol (СPCM) • G = -2.7 kcal/mol (СPCM, optimization, 78 hrs.) • G = -5±1 kcal/mol (Experiment) Blue structure is the precursor, 4-biphenyl is planar Red structure is successor, 4-biphenyl dihedral angle is 42.9º 27 MENSHUTKIN REACTION NH3 CH3Cl NH3CH3+ Cl- What is G and G≠ for the reaction? What is the nature of the transition state? How does solvent change the result? 28 MENSHUTKIN REACTION NH3 Cl- NH3CH3+ CH3Cl Model G≠ G Gas 43.7 120.0 Onsager 18.2 10.0 DPCM@Onsager 24.2 -21.0 CPCM 24.8 -21.5 Gas ? 110 Solution 24 -30 Experiment – for CH3I Energies in kcal/mol 29 MENSHUTKIN REACTION: TRANSITION STATE Model C-N C-Cl H-N-C Cl-C-H Gas 1.765 2.571 110.6 78.7 Onsager 2.273 2.250 112.6 94.2 CPCM 2.145 2.249 110.3 92.6 30 RECOMMENDATIONS Preliminary in vacuo calculations (geometry and wavefunction guess) In many cases SP SCRF after Optimization in vacuo is enough IEFPCM ( It is the default method in G03) When memory is limited, or the system is large, the Iterative algorithm is faster and less demanding than Inversion When time is crucial, CPCM is recommended under some conditions: polar solvent; keyword Iterative! 31