File

advertisement

CHAPTER 2

2-1

CRIMES AND CRIMINAL

JUSTICE

WHAT DO YOU THINK

THE FOLLOWING

VOCABULARY TERMS

IN THIS CHAPTER

MEAN

HOW WOULD YOU DEFINE

THE FOLLOWING WORDS?

INTENT

MOTIVE

IMPULSE

INTENT

MEANS PURPOSE

MOTIVE

MEANS THAT WHICH INWARDLY

MOVES A PERSON A CERTAIN

WAY

IMPULSE

MEANS STIMULUS IN THE MIND

ARISING FROM SOME FEELING

CRIME

AN OFFENSE COMMITTED AGAINST

THE PUBLIC GOOD, OR SOCIETY

--PEOPLE CONVICTED OF A CRIME

CAN BE FINED, IMPRISONED, OR

IF LEGAL IN THEIR STATE,

SENTENCED TO DEATH

DEFENDANT

A PERSON WHO IS ACCUSED

OF A CRIME

PLAINTIFF

PARTY THAT ACCUSES A

PERSON OF A CRIME

--The state or the federal government, whomever is representing the public, is the plaintiff--

PROSECUTOR

THE GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL WHO

BRINGS THE CASE AGAINST THE

DEFENDANT

In some states, this prosecutor is the

DISTRICT ATTORNEY

The prosecutor represents the people, or the public, in a criminal case

A FELONY

IS A MAJOR CRIME

*********

--PUNISHABLE BY FINE,

IMPRISONMENT, OR BOTH

--MAY ALSO BE CALLED A HIGH

MISDEMEANOR

SERIOUS CRIMES ARE

PROSECUTED IN COURTS

AND RELY ON PHYSICAL

EVIDENCE AND

TESTIMONIES OF

WITNESSES AND

EXPERTS

SOME EXAMPLES OF

FELONIES---

*ROBBERY

*RAPE

*AGGRAVATED BATTERY

*ARSON

*DRUG POSSESSION

*BURGLARY

*MURDER (Most Serious Felony)

PEOPLE CONVICTED OF A

FELONY MAY ALSO BE LIABLE

FOR A CIVIL PENALTY

AWARDED TO THE VICTIM OR

THE VICTIM’S FAMILY

Example: Rape Victim May Be Able To Sue

The Defendant To Recover The Costs Of

Medical Bills And Counseling

A MISDEMEANOR

IS A LESS SERIOUS CRIME

Usually punishable by a fine, jail time or both

Jail time is normally less than ONE year

Jail time spent in a smaller, county jail, rather than a state penitentiary

INFRACTION

A MINOR OFFENSE THAT IS USUALLY

PUNISHABLE WITH A FINE AND NOT

WITH JAIL TIME

--SOMETIMES CALLED MINOR MISDEMEANORS

OR PETTY CRIMES (of small importance or secondary in rank)

Example: Minor traffic violations

CRIMINAL LAW IN THE

U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM

**Both federal and state courts have the power to make and enforce criminal laws, but the

POWERS of each are different**

FEDERAL CRIMINAL LAW

--U. S. Constitution limits the powers of the federal government, therefore, the federal government cannot make criminal laws, but there are exceptions:

*Make Laws Against Counterfeiting Money

*Power To Create Its Own Police Force (FBI)

COMMERCE CLAUSE IN U. S.

CONSTITUTION SAYS THE

U. S. CONGRESS CAN REGULATE

INTERSTATE COMMERCE, OR

BUSINESS THAT CROSSES STATE

LINES. THEREFORE, FEDERAL

CRIMINAL LAW USUALLY

INVOLVES COMMERCE AMONG

THE STATES.

STATE CRIMINAL LAW

EACH STATE GOVERNMENT HAS THE POWER

TO MAKE CRIMINAL LAWS. THAT POWER IS

CALLED THE STATE’S POLICE POWER.

DEFINITIONS AND NAMES OF CRIMES MAY BE

DIFFERENT FROM STATE TO STATE —

Example: a crime may be called a theft in one state, but may be called stealing in another

ELEMENTS OF A CRIME

Could you be convicted of a crime if the state cannot prove you had a motive??

A CRIME IS MADE UP OF

ELEMENTS —

1. THE CRIMINAL ACT

2. THE REQUIRED STATE OF MIND

CRIMINAL ACT

MUST DESCRIBE THE SPECIFIC CONDUCT THAT

THE LAW FORBIDS

(Ex. Definition of theft is stealing another person’s property OR robbery is stealing another person’s property through violence or the threat of violence)

SOME CRIMINAL LAWS MAKE NOT DOING

SOMETHING A CRIME

(Ex. Not paying taxes that are owed)

CRIMINAL ACT MUST BE VOLUNTARY; NOT A

PERSON’S CONDITION

(Ex. Not a crime to be an alcoholic, because alcoholism is a condition —not an act. However, the government may create laws that make it a crime to operate a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol)

REQUIRED STATE OF MIND

*THE LAW DEFINING MURDER FORBIDS THE

INTENTIONAL TAKING OF A PERSON’S LIFE—

THE REQUIRED MENTAL STATE IS INTENT .

*THE LAW DEFINING INVOLUNTARY

MANSLAUGHTER FORBIDS THE NEGLIGENT

TAKING OF SOMEBODY’S LIFE—THE

REQUIRED MENTAL STATE IS NEGLIGENCE .

IN BOTH CASES, CRIMINAL ACT IS TAKING A

PERSON’S LIFE AND THE MENTAL STATE IS

THE INTENTION IN ONE CASE OR THE

CARELESSNESS IN TAKING ANOTHER

PERSON’S LIFE IN THE OTHER.

MOTIVE plays part in proving that a person committed a crime.

*********

All that is needed is to prove that a defendant committed a CRIMINAL ACT WITH the

REQUIRED STATE OF MIND

DEFENSES TO CRIMES

• INSANITY

• ENTRAPMENT

• SELF-DEFENSE

• DEFENSE OF FAMILY MEMBERS

INSANITY

AN INSANITY DEFENSE REQUIRES

THAT THE PERSON DID NOT

KNOW THE DIFFERENCE

BETWEEN RIGHT AND WRONG

WHEN HE/SHE COMMITTED THE

CRIME

The oldest legal test of insanity is called

M’Naghten Rule. This goes back to an

1834 English case when M’Naghten was acquitted for killing the Prime Minister’s secretary because he was insane and did not know what he was doing.

*******

Under this rule, a defendant must have a mental disease so serious that he/she does not know the difference between right and wrong when he or she commits the crime.

Another test used by some states is the IMPULSE test.

**********

Under this rule, the defendant must have a mental disease that makes telling the difference between right and wrong impossible or makes the defendant unable to stop him/herself from committing the crime.

The American law Institute (ALI) has a more modern test for insanity.

***********

Under ALI rule, the defendant must have a mental disease so serious that they lack substantial capacity either to appreciate the criminality of the conduct or to conform the conduct to the requirements of law.

People who are found not guilty by reason of insanity DO NOT go free.

They go to a mental institution to receive treatment and are released when found to be sane.

They are then required to serve their punishment.

In a criminal case, the defense tries to show that the prosecution failed to prove the required elements of the crime.

• What element of a crime does the insanity defense seek to eliminate??

The Required State of Mind

ENTRAPMENT

A PERSON WAS TALKED INTO OR

TRICKED BY A LAW ENFORCEMENT

OFFICIAL INTO COMMITTING A CRIME

THEY WOULD NOT OTHERWISE HAVE

COMMITTED.

SELF-DEFENSE

USING FORCE TO PROTECT YOURSELF

WHEN BELIEVING YOU ARE IN DANGER

OF BEING HURT OR KILLED

**In some states, the person using self-defense must try to run away first, but is NOT necessary if it happens in their own home**

Cannot use this if the confrontation was initiated by the person or if they continue to use force even after the danger is gone

DEFENSE OF FAMILY MEMBERS

USING FORCE TO PROTECT A FAMILY

MEMBER IF THERE IS GOOD REASON TO

BELIEVE THE VICTIM WAS IN DANGER

OF SEVERE BODILY INJURY OR DEATH

CANNOT be used if the crime occurs after the threat of harm has passed

ADDITIONAL DEFENSES IN

WISCONSIN

• Under the Influence of Drugs or Alcohol

– Defendant can argue that their mental functioning was so impaired that they cannot be held accountable for their actions.

– Does not excuse criminal conduct.

– Only a partial defense—would not require proof of intent.

ADDITIONAL DEFENSES IN

WISCONSIN

• Alibi

– Defense consists of evidence that defendant was somewhere other than the scene of the crime at the time it was committed

– It is a respectable defense.

CRITICAL THINKING —

Sam and Wade are walking home after school when they are attacked by two gang members. Sam and Wade overpower their attackers. Sam knocks his attacker to the ground and sits on him until the police arrive, but Wade keeps hitting his attacker in the head even after he is lying on the ground unconscious.

Can Sam claim self-defense? Can Wade? Explain.

Download