• Instructor:
• E-mail Address:
• Office:
• Class hours:
• Class Location:
• Web:
052 430
Michael Cooke michco@kku.ac.th
IC room 817
Friday 13:00-16:00
IC room 806 home/kku.ac.th/michco
1: How would substantial innovation bring advantage?
A) When a market pioneer competes with much larger competitors
B) If potential competitors view the innovations as transient (will have no lasting impact)
C) If the innovators is able to establish a patent or technology barrier
D) Both B and C
2: Which is NOT a motivation for a company to adopt global strategy
A) As a defensive stance, need presence in home market of competitor
B) Access to strategic markets
C) Rapidly growing home markets
D) Investment incentives or trade barriers
3: To communicate value
A ) Reduce the price, the lower the better
B) Communicate why a cost advantage exists
C) Focus on the invisible price points
D) Both B and C
4: Which is an example of synergy?
A) Reducing costs through sharing marketing resources or other assets
B) Adding a management function to coordinate the activities of two marketing departments
C) Two organizations with different cultures merge and managers from each fight for control
D) Both B and C
Leveraging or energizing a business builds on existing business
Another approach is to change what the customer is buying through creating a new market or sub-market
Usually involves transformational innovation
Innovation may bring high returns for long time periods
The ‘Blue Ocean’ challenge is to create demand where it does not exist
Blue Oceans have little competition
In crowded ‘Red Oceans’ overcapacity, lack of differentiation, and low margins are the challenge
Innovation can be conceptual or based on technology
Successful innovation requires adding value
Lower cost and differentiation can be achieved at same time
Key indicator of innovation is the amount of competition
New firms perform better than existing firms
Established firms struggle in competitive markets
Incremental innovation tends to be quickly copied
Established firms tend to create over-capacity
New industries and firms with new business models tend to have higher profit
Competitors are slow to respond to innovation
Established companies want to protect their revenue
Companies want to protect their brands
Firms tend to view innovations as transient
Competitors may not be able to respond
Technology barriers such as patents
Organizational constraints, such as culture or systems
Cultures are difficult to duplicate
Org constraints a common reason competitors fail to respond
The innovator can capture customer loyalty
Customer may have no incentive to try a different product
Customer switching costs may be high
First mover advantage involves building position
Build customer base quickly through low prices
First movers may get innovative reputation
Pioneers tend to fail while firms that establish leadership during early growth phases are more successful
Early Market leaders have low failure rates (though pioneers often fail)
Price product at mass market level
Are patient investors
Are often dominant in a related category
Brand name associations
Existing distribution channels
The innovator focuses on what category to buy
Leading brand viewed as authentic and reliable
Market leader need not focus on which brand to buy
Managing category perceptions is important in new markets
Focus on attributes and functional benefits from the start
(rather than emotional or expressive benefits)
Labels are important (product descriptive or brand names)
Maintaining dominance in competitive environments
Some firms make themselves a moving target
Strong brands create an aura of being authentic (versus copies)
Some create barriers to entry with competencies
Clayton Christensen studied disruptive innovation
Low-end disruptive innovation
Established firms target best customers
Aim to get higher margins and loyalty with features, service, etc
Develop structures, skills, incentives for reliable profit
Incumbents usually win with sustainable innovations because of resources
Low-end customers often ignored by established firms
Low-end disruptors target the ignored customers
Introduce easy to use and cheap product versions
At outset, usually an inferior product offering
Low-end offering may improve over time
Stall points for established firms often involve low-end disruption
New-Market innovative disruptions appeal to non-customers
Products considered too expensive or difficult to use by many
Ease of use and lower prices can open a new market
Few firms create multiple new businesses
Strategic adaptability plays a major role in successful innovation
(chapter 7)
Involves organizational flexibility
Organization can identify, evaluate, and adapt to trends
Strategic commitment required for existing products
Loyalty to a core strategy which assumes future will be much like the past
Involves execution of strategy and continual improvement
Vulnerable to paradigm shifts
Few firms have both innovation (adaptable) and incremental change
(commitment) capabilities
Reasons firms fail to innovate
Short term financial pressure = focus on existing business
Organizational structures (functional or product silos)
Complacency (why change when business is good?)
Fear of cannibalizing existing business (recall Kodak)
Culture committed to existing business model
Size inhibits new business ventures which start small
Lack of material financial impact from new ventures (no shareholder returns)
May be unable to handle smaller business (Exxon failed in electronics innovation)
Create a distinct organization
Acquisition of an innovator followed by independence
Create a stand-alone unit within the organization
Separate organization can use some elements of parent
Stand-alone needs to be flexible and entrepreneurial
Dual organization (both committed and adaptable)
Requires different cost control systems and performance metrics
Can bring energy to core businesses
Difficult to achieve due to differences
New business ventures need access to capital
Stock market or venture capital available if external
Top management commitment to internal innovation needed for adequate internal funding
(McLoughlin 13)
What are the global strategy objectives?
Product standardization versus customization
Brand and marketing standardization
How can the business expand globally?
Use of alliances to enter countries
Global brand management
Global
Brand
Associations
Obtaining
Scale
Economies
Access
Low-Cost
Labor/Materials
Access
Strategically
Important
Markets
Access
National
Investment
Incentives
Dodge
Trade
Barriers
Cross-
Subsidization
Chapter 13 - Global Strategies Figure 13.1
PPT 13-11
Scale economies
Scale economies result from larger sales base
Standard design (VW advantage over Renault-Nissan)
Standardized worldwide marketing programs
Research and development costs
Companies may aim to reduce number of sub-brands to achieve scale economies
Consumer preference for global brands (quality and innovation associations)
Worldwide sourcing of product and marketing innovations
Global differences in labor and materials costs
National investment incentives (taxes or subsidies)
A way around trade barriers (by locating plants within a market)
Cross subsidization (using the resources in one market to subsidize battles in another market)
As a defensive stance, need presence in home market of competitor
Goodyear retaliated in Europe against Michelin’s attack in the USA
Kodak failed to counter Fuji’s attack and lost market share in the USA
Access to strategically important markets
Size or potential of market
Industry trends and technology emanate from certain markets
Locate design and manufacturing in certain areas to observe competitors and learn new technology
Certain technologies emanate from Silicon Valley, attracting other firms and talent
A standardized brand is easier to manage
Brand management involves establishing brand identity and making it drive brand building
A global brand makes this easier to accomplish than country specific brand strategies
Simpler organizational structures with one brand
A global product may not be perfect in any market
Brands often should not be standard across all countries
Markets may differ in fundamental ways
Market share differences across markets
Customer motivations (light skin in some parts of Asia)
Different distribution channels
Customer familiarity with the product may vary
Differences in economic development
Local heritage (build on relationship to local brand) or COO issues
Cultural responses to words and symbols may differ (pronunciation, etc)
Names and positions might be owned in certain areas (cybersquatting and trademarks owned)
Local brand equity (from an acquired company)
Best to coordinate strategies in individual countries
Size or growth rates
Intensity of competition in the market
Absence of cultural or operational barriers
Political climate
For competitive reasons and to achieve scale a global product roll out is often best
Sequential entry allows refinement of strategy based on experience, involves less initial investment
Excerpts from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/30/opinion/friedman-its-pq-and-cq-as-much-asiq.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20130130&pagewanted=print
The prefix ‘hyper’ means excessive.
According to Thomas Friedman - In the last decade the world went from connected to hyper-connected in a way that impacts every job, industry and school.
In a world connected by digital technologies, people can compete, connect and collaborate from anywhere (The “World is Flat” was published in 2004)
Virtually everyone everywhere has access to a hand-held computer, connected via the cloud to infinite applications and storage, so they can work, invent, entertain, collaborate and learn for less money than ever before.
Every boss now also has cheap, easy, and fast access to software, automation, robotics, labor and brains anywhere in the world.
When the world gets this hyper-connected, the speed of change for every job and industry becomes hyper-mode.
In the past, we could assume that an educational foundation would last your whole lifetime.
Now people have to learn throughout life.
Not surprisingly, incomes around the world converge, as bright people in poor countries get access to the same information as educated people in the developed world.
We discussed the book “ Race Against the Machine : How the Digital Revolution Is
Accelerating Innovation, Driving Productivity, and Irreversibly Transforming Employment and the Economy”
With the digital revolution people with more education start to earn much more than those without it
Those with the capital to buy and use machines earn much more than those who can only offer their labor
Superstars reach global markets and earn much more than those with slightly less talent
Which languages do people use to enter the globally connected world?
Michael Dalder/Reuters
Quality is defined by customers in ways that change through time
Product or service performance
Reliability and customer satisfaction
Latest features
Customer support
Ease of buying and using
Design (aesthetics)
Quality dimensions are difficult for customers to measure
To get a quality image, the firm may focus on a visible dimension
In supermarkets people associate fresh produce with overall quality
Service quality is based on the people with whom customers interact
Customer expectations must be managed
Need to plan for handling peak demand (staffing for average volume leaves peak demand times without enough coverage)
Motivated employees are a differentiator
Market leaders usually have an image of higher quality
Quality is usually associated with higher price and profit
Quality stimulates innovation because the target changes
An organizational culture that stresses quality motivates employees
To deliver good service and superior products
To react to blunders or improper conduct
Loss of trust in a brand can be disastrous
Reduce incidence and intensity of perceived failures
Firms must have contingency plans for disaster management
A favored approach is to admit responsibility and quickly take action
Price might be a signal of quality (especially in certain, categories like clothing)
To communicate value (rather than low price)
Communicate why a cost advantage exists
Position the product among the right competitors (which might change during a recession)
Demonstrate affordability (cost over time)
Add features or services rather than reduce price
Bundle products (often done at little incremental cost)
Use value sub-brands
Manage visible price points
Customers know about a few brands or categories
Customers closely watch auto base prices, often know little about options
Booksellers keep best seller prices low, less well known books have higher prices
Long term perspective
Assumption that future will be similar to past
Execution and improvement are keys to success
Continuous improvement is about incremental change
Often best in centralized organizations with specialist employees
Barriers to implementation
The environment changes (paradigms shift)
New operating models
New technology
New paradigms often dominated by former minor players
PPT 7-20 Chapter 7 - Creating Advantage, Synergy and Strategic Philosophies
Differs from a key success factor (KSF)
A KSF is required to be in the game, not usually unique to a brand
An SCA confers advantage over competitors
Points of differentiation (unique brand associations)
A competitor might copy a POD, which then eliminates the differentiation
Superior value for money can be an SCA
SCAs need to be meaningful and sustainable
Patents
Moving target of innovation
A reputation can be more valuable than substance
Value proposition must be visible through positioning
Competitors have difficult time convincing customers their offering matches quality or performance
An SCA is relative to whether competitors are weak or strong in key assets or competencies
Assumes a fast changing market and that it is not possible to predict the future so that the best strategy is to be sensitive to current opportunities and exploit them.
Firms will often seek niches (reduces risk of missing new business opportunities)
Economies of scope with multiple products lines
Short-term oriented
Decentralized, entrepreneurial, risk taking organization
With lack of vision, opportunism can become drift
Responding to transitory forces
Focus on immediate profit may lead to dead end (single order)
Resources may be diverted from sound businesses
Businesses might be incompatible or firm might lack assets and competencies
PPT 7-22 Chapter 7 - Creating Advantage, Synergy and Strategic Philosophies
Assumes a dynamic market and that the organization can predict and manage responses to those changes
Adapt products to changing markets to maintain relevance
New markets and submarkets emerge about 5-10 years apart
Adaptive firms will do transformational innovation
Must be able to identify trends, respond aggressively
Organizational flexibility is required
Adjust or develop strategies when for external or internal changes
Often means having liquidity (think of Apple’s billions) to seize opportunities
Flexibility can come from having slack capacity in distribution, staffing or R&D
A robust brand portfolio might allow the firm to avoid creating new brands
Microsoft has succeeded in moving from operating systems via flexibility
A medium term perspective
Errors in interpreting trends or the emergence of submarkets
Wasted resources
Potential impact on the brand and the company culture
Execution issues (strategy can not be implemented) – Benz & Chrysler
PPT 7-23 Chapter 7 - Creating Advantage, Synergy and Strategic Philosophies
Firms might use all three philosophies
Each is often needed for success across different businesses in which the firm is engaged
Starbuck’s refines the store concept (commitment) and has:
Opportunism
Ice Cream in supermarkets
Coffee in airplanes
Adaptability
Kiosks in supermarkets and airports
Soluble coffee in markets
Google is committed to search
Adaptable by acquiring search related capabilities
Made opportunistic acquisitions such as YouTube and gone into niches such as Scholar
Chapter 7 - Creating Advantage, Synergy and Strategic Philosophies PPT 7-24
To create an SCA, a strategy needs to be valued by the market and supported by assets and competencies that are not easily copied or neutralized by competitors. The most common SCAs are quality reputation, customer support, and brand name.
Synergy is often sustainable because it is based on the unique characteristics of an organization.
Strategic commitment, involving a
‘stick-to-your-knitting’ focus on a clearly articulated strategy, is based on an assumption that the business model needs to be refined and improved and not changed.
Strategic opportunism assumes that the environment is so dynamic and uncertain that it is futile to predict the future and invest behind those opportunities when they present themselves, with the goal of achieving immediate profits.
Strategic adaptability, based on the assumption that it is possible to understand, predict and manage responses to market dynamics that emerge, and even create or influence them, is about managing relevance.
At a Pearl River area factory labor costs (wages plus benefits) per worker have been rising 30 percent or more each year. Nationwide migrant worker wages are rising is 21 percent annually. The government has mandated 13 percent annual minimum wage increases through 2015. This is about three times inflation.
Wages at the factory are rising fast because it is in an area that was slower to develop. Five years ago, the factory paid $90 to $120 a month to new workers. Workers gave $13 to $40 of their monthly pay for six months to their foreman for training. Now the factory offers new employees 2,500 renminbi a month, about $395, before overtime *. Six-person dorm rooms have been replaced with two-person apartments.
Workers no longer have to give part of their wages to the foreman.
Foremen now get an $8 to $16 bonus for each month that a new blue-collar employee stays on the job.
The factory struggles to find workers.
An outcome of China’s one-child policy is that many college graduates are only children with parents and grandparents who continue to support them into adulthood. Those children do not want factory work.
A factory manager said: “Their parents, their grandparents give them money; they have six people to support them. They say, Why do I need to work? I can stay home and get 2,000 renminbi a month, why should I get on a bus every day to earn 2,500 a month?”
China’s vocational schools and training programs are unpopular. They are seen as dead-ends. They are also seen as schools for people from peasant backgrounds. “The more educated people are, the less they want to work in a factory.”
The number getting vocational training is about half that of students taking academic courses.
The combination of the one-child policy and rising rates of college education is starting to hit the core of
China’s factory work force: 18- to 21-year-olds not in college. Their numbers are on track to plunge by 29 percent from 2010 to 2020 even if enrollments in higher education hold steady.
“We have jobs and positions for which skilled workers cannot be found, and on the other hand, we have talented people who cannot find jobs; technical and vocational education and training is the answer,” the vice minister of education said at a conference last June.
* Note that in dollar terms wages have risen even faster than in renminbi due to exchange rates.
http://www.nytimes.com/ 2013/01/25/business/as-graduates-rise-in-china-office-jobs-fail-to-keepup.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_ 20130125&pagewanted=print
China’s large pool of surplus rural labor has played a key role in maintaining low inflation and supporting China’s growth model.
As agriculture surplus labor is exhausted, industrial wages rise faster, industrial profits are squeezed, and investment falls.
Rebalancing China’s growth pattern would produce significant positive external spillovers and potentially raise output in those countries within the supply chain (mainly emerging Asia) and commodity exporters.
Demographics strongly suggest an imminent transition to a labor-shortage economy.
China will have a profound demographic shift within the next decade
The UN projects that growth of the working age (15–64) population will turn negative around 2020.
This forecast potentially understates prospects of a labor shortage:
Industry employees are predominantly young.
The growth rate of the core 20-39 subpopulation, shrank to zero in 2010 and will decline faster than the overall working age population.
After a long period of “demographic dividends,” the share of dependents (those aged 0–14 and > 64 years of age) was lowest in 2010 and will rise (see next slide)
Raising agricultural productivity by raising mechanization could result in a sizable release of rural workers that could partially offset labor shortfalls in urban areas.
Scenario analysis shows that higher fertility through relaxation of the one-child policy will delay depletion of excess labor (slightly). Financial reform will accelerate the transition to a labor shortage economy, through wealth effects.
Very low fertility rates still prevail, especially in the richest parts of the country. Shanghai reported fertility of just 0.6 in 2010—probably the lowest level anywhere in the world.
According to the UN's population division, the nationwide fertility rate will continue to decline, reaching 1.51 in 2015-20 (http://www.economist.com/node/21553056)
* From an IMF working paper.
* From an IMF working paper.
China’s demographic challenge may not be the disaster people are thinking about (A).
China’s industries are not very automated compared to developed countries.
China’s capital efficiency is poor. (Where, for example, does all that steel actually go? Think of the old Soviet Union’s steel and concrete production.)
If China’s capital efficiency rose to match Japan’s, China’s growth prospects could theoretically remain high.
China invests a higher percentage of GDP, but invests less efficiently than
Japan, South Korea and Taiwan during their rapid expansions. (A)
In 2012 the working-age population in China decreased 3.45 million. It is
937.27 million according to the director of the National Bureau of
Statistics. (B)
The director said that China should work to boost labor productivity, as well as improve people's education and adjust types of employment to extend the dividend. (B)
An economist at the China Center for International Economic Exchanges in Beijing says that the fading of China's demographic dividend has required China to increase spending on education and culture to boost the quality of the country's human resources, said (B)
A) FT.com 6 Feb 2013
B) http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/indepth/2013-01/18/c_132112584.htm
http://www.economist.com/node/13611235 right side, and http://www.investmentu.com/2010/January/the-dependency-ratio.html
FT.com 6 Feb 2013
In 2005 the investment bank Goldman Sachs changed the way it paid its employees:
Before 2005 managers made assessed employees based not just on how much business you’d brought in, but also on how good you were for the organization.
These two factors combined indicated your true economic value to the company.
After 2005 the system has become largely mathematical: employee bonuses were a percentage of the amount of revenue the employee brought to the firm.
In some years, the bonus would be 5 percent of that revenue; in better years, it would be 7 percent.
“The problem with the new system was that people would do anything they could—anything—to pump up the number next to their name.”
The incentives changed, the behavior followed.
According to Lewis: “Goldman now rewarded its people for advancing their narrow interests at the expense of their customers, the wider society, and even the firm's own long-term interests. “
“The change in incentives almost certainly can be traced back to Goldman's decision, in the late 1990s, to go public. “
The firm ceased to be a partnership (with partners having unlimited personal liability) and became a public corporation.
The people who ran it ceased to have a long-term interest in Goldman's reputation and ceased to have a long-term exposure to its losses. http://www.newrepublic.com/article/112209/michael-lewis-goldman-sachs#
Carnegie Mellon University said it was awarded $1.17 billion by a federal jury in Pittsburgh last December in
Marvell Technology Group had used technology developed at the university without a license.
The patents were developed by a professor and a former Ph.D. student in the department of electrical and computer engineering.
Their work was supported by Carnegie’s Data Storage Systems
Center, a university research organization
CMU said Marvell had infringed on patents relating to technology for increasing the accuracy of reading data from high-speed magnetic disks used in hard drives.
The university said “Protection of the discoveries of our faculty and students is very important to us.” http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/27/technology/marvell-ordered-to-pay-1-17-billion-in-patentcase.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20121227&pagewanted=print
Thai companies are going where the money is. They're going to countries with large natural resources and markets (A).
PTT Exploration & Production (PTT) has been expanding abroad aggressively.
In November 2010 it purchased 40 per cent of Statoil ASA's oil sands project in
Canada for $2.28 billion.
In August 2012, PTT made a $959-million offer to buy out a Singaporean coal miner Sakari Resources
July 2012 PTT purchased UK-listed Cove Energy for $1.9 billion, with assets in
Africa.
PTT has invested more than $6BB in Myanmar.
Charoen Pokphand Group in December purchased a 15.5-per-cent stake in
China's second largest insurance company from HSBC for $9.39 billion
With a market cap of about US$13.79 billion and over $864 million in profits
Siam Cement Group has been very actively investing in Indonesia. (A)
Thai Beverage, makers of Chang Beer made an $11BB bid for the Singapore based Fraser and Neave Ltd.
ThaiBev said the deal brings exposure to high-growth Southeast Asian markets with attractive demographics and consumer-spending trends. (WSJ)
Fraser & Neave has a portfolio of soft-drink brands and properties in the region.
Central Retail Corp. spent €260 million, or about US$320 million, to acquire the entire stake in La Rinascente in Milan in May last year. (WSJ)
(A) Karim Raslan The Star Kuala Lumpur January 4, 2013
WSJ.com 18-7-12
Last November Wal-Mart said that its investigation into violations of a federal anti-bribery included Mexico , China, India and Brazil, among their most important international markets.
More than half of Wal-Mart’s 10,524 stores are international. Mexico has 2,230 stores. Brazil has 534, China, 384.
Wal-Mart found evidence of potential violations of the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act, beginning with bribery involving the opening of stores in
Mexico
Wal-Mart sees the degree to which corruption may have infected its international operations, and shows growing alarm within the company about the problem.
In 2005, a former lawyer for Wal-Mart in Mexico spent hours telling company investigators how Wal-Mart de Mexico’s leadership had managed a bribery campaign to speed expansion. The lawyer said hundreds of bribes were paid for construction permits and other licenses needed to open new stores.
Wal-Mart is changing as a result of investigations. Lawyers for each country now report to the general counsel of Wal-Mart International . Before they reported to the chief executives of that country — which could create conflicts of interest if the chief executive was involved in corruption.
According to a lawyer, in these situations a company will report to government agencies with “very detailed presentations about the results of the internal investigation” in the hope of receiving lesser punishment from the agencies. http://www.nytimes.com/ 2012/11/16/business/wal-mart-expands-foreign-briberyinvestigation.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_ 20121116&_r=0