The Challenge of Clinical Integration

advertisement

The Challenge of Clinical Integration

Jeffrey. H. Peters, MD

September 2015

Quality

Safety

Healthcare Systems

Clinical Integration

Institutes

High Reliability

Medicine

UH Organizational Profile

Large, Diverse Integrated Delivery System

• Founded in 1866, 149 yrs of service

• $3.7 billion annual operating net revenue

• 25,000 Employees

• 1,752 registered beds

• 18 Hospitals in NE Ohio, 35 Major Outpatient Centers

• 923,081 Unique Patients Seen/yr

• 2,927 UH Providers, 1,576 Independent & Affiliated Providers

• ~ 129,500 Discharges

• 83,929 Surgeries

Opportunities & Challenges

• Systemwide Quality

• New Paradigms

• Institute deployment

• High reliability Medicine

• The example of OB Care

• Variability

Atul Gawande

Hospital Consolidation

US Farming Industry 1950-2000

Grocery Industry

• By 2009, the top four food retailers

Wal-Mart, Kroger, Costco and

Supervalue controlled more than half of all grocery sales.

• largest 100 metropolitan areas, the four largest food retailers controlled 72% of sales by 1998.

Key Principles for Health System

Integration

1. Comprehensive Services across the continuum of care

2. Patient focus

3. Geographic coverage & Access

4. Standardized care delivery through multidisciplinary teams

5. Performance management

6. Information systems

7. Organizational culture & leadership

8. Physician integration

9. Governance structure

10. Financial integration

Big Med – Atul Gawande

“The theory this county is about to test is that chains will make us better and more efficient. The question is how. To most of us who work in healthcare, throwing a bunch of administrators and accountants into the mix seems unlikely to help.

Good medicine cant be reduced to a recipe.

Then again neither can good food; every dish requires attention to detail and individual adjustments that require human judgment.”

New Yorker Aug 13, 2012

The UH Difference

Integrates 7 Centers of Excellence to deliver unparalleled support for sustainable improvement and innovation in care delivery:

Center for Performance

Improvement

Center for Patient

Experience

Center for Quality

Education

Center for Clinical

Informatics

Center for Clinical

Risk/Harm Prevention

Center for Quality

Research

Center for Quality Care in Nursing

UH Quality Institute

Year over Year improvement in:

• Mortality Index

• Core Measures

• Patient Safety Indicators

• Hospital Acquired Infections

• Readmissions

• Measurable Improvement in Value

(Quality/Cost)

• Patient Satisfaction

Confidential Quality Assurance/Peer Review Privileged Pursuant to Ohio Revised Code Sections 2305.24, 2305.25, .251, .252, .253

Mortality, Hospitalizations, and Expenditures for the Medicare Population Aged 65 Years or

Older, 1999-2013

JAMA. 2015;314(4):355-365. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.8035

UH Center for High

Reliability Medicine

“The journey to provide safe, evidence based and effective care that drives out unnecessary variation and creates value”

High Reliability Heath Care; Getting

There from Here

“As opposed to preoccupation with avoiding failure, hospitals and other health care organizations behave as if they accept failure as an inevitable feature of their daily work.”

MR Chassin & JM Loeb. 2013; Joint Commission

UH CLABSI 2014-2015

Confidential Quality Assurance/Peer Review Privileged Pursuant to Ohio Revised Code Sections 2305.24, 2305.25, .251, .252, .253

An Intervention to reduce Catheter Related blood Stream

Infections in the ICU (n=103)

Pronovost P et al. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2725-2732

Pronovost et al. NEJM 2006; 355:

RBC July 2008 – July 2015

Big Med – Atul Gawande

“ In medicine too we are trying to deliver a range of service to millions of people at a reasonable cost and with a consistent level of quality. Unlike the Cheesecake Factory, we haven't figured out how. Our costs are soaring, the service is typically mediocre, and the quality unreliable. Every clinician has his or her own way of doing things, and the rates of failure and complication (not to mention costs) for a given service routinely vary by a factor of 2-3, even within the same hospital.

New Yorker Aug 13, 2012

VARIABILITY

Colon Surgery – Length of Stay by Surgeon

14,00

12,00

10,00

8,00

6,00

4,00

2,00

0,00

DR A DR B DR C

Top 6 Surgeons by volume for UHCMC

DR D DR E

Source: University Healthsystems Consortium, Year 2014, MS-DRG 330

Confidential Quality Assurance/Peer Review Privileged Pursuant to Ohio Revised Code Sections 2305.24, 2305.25, .251, .252, .253

Confidential Quality Assurance Peer Review Privileged Pursuant to O.R.C. Sections 2305.24, 2305.25, 2305.251, 2305.252 and 2305.253

DR F

30

Serum lactate testing:

Bundle utilization variation by point-of-entry care pathway

Emergency Department admissions compared to other acute admission pathways:

100%

90%

80%

74%

73%

69%

86%

80%

71%

70%

60%

66%

64%

59%

68%

60% 56% 55%

50%

51%

44%

40%

32%

30%

30%

17%

20%

10%

0%

Case

Medical

Bedford Conneaut Geauga

ED Admit

Geneva Richmond St. Johns

Admitted Other Pathway System Utilization

Ahuja Parma

Peer Utilization

45%

36%

Elyria

Case

Medical

ED Admit 640

Other Pathway 834

Total Case Count

Bedford Conneaut Geauga Geneva Richmond St. Johns Ahuja

157

45

65

23

336

149

59

13

337

61

628

47

538

246

Parma Elyria

673

80

619

66

© 2015 PREMIER, INC.

The NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL of MEDICINE

SPECIAL ARTICLE

Variation in Hospital Mortality Associated with Inpatient Surgery

Amir A. Ghaferi, M.D., John D. Birkmeyer, M.D., and Justin B. Dimick, M.D., M.P.H.

From the Michigan

Surgical Collaborative for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, the

Department of Surgery,

University of Michigan,

Ann Arbor. Address reprint requests to Dr. Ghaferi at

Michigan Surgical

Collaborative for

Outcomes Research and

Evaluation, 211 N. Fourth

Ave., Suite 201, Ann

Arbor, MI 48104, or at aghaferi@umich.edu ...

N Engl J Med 2009;

361:1368-75.

ABSTRACT

Background

Hospital mortality that is associated with inpatient surgery varies widely. Reducing rates of postoperative complications, the current focus of payers and regulators, may be one approach to reducing mortality. However, effective management of complications once they have occurred may be equally important.

Methods

We studied 84,730 patients who had undergone inpatient general and vascular surgery from 2005 through 2007, using data from the American College of

Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. We first ranked hospitals according to their risk-adjusted overall rate of death and divided them into five groups. For hospitals in each overall mortality quintile, we then assessed the incidence of overall and major complications and the rate of death among patients with major complications.

Rates of All Complications, Major Complications, and

Death After Major Complications, According to Hospital

Quintile of Mortality

Ghaferi, A., et al., N Engl J Med 2009;361:1368-1400

Variation in Hospital Mortality Associated with Inpatient Surgery

Although rates of death for patients who underwent inpatient surgery varied by a factor of nearly two (3.5% to 6.9%) across in postoperative complications. Specifically, high- and low-mortality hospitals had nearly identical rates of postoperative complications.

Ghaferi, A., et al., N Engl J Med 2009;361:1368-1400

Variation in Hospital Mortality Associated with Inpatient Surgery

“Although the value of avoiding complications in the first place is obvious, our findings also suggest that improving the care that patients receive once complications have occurred is crucial for reducing.” pg. 1373

Ghaferi, A., et al., N Engl J Med 2009;361:1368-1400

Patient Story

71 y/o with history of HTN, transplant patient (immunosuppressed) with neurosurgical issues, hospitalized multiple times in the last 2 months at different hospitals. Admitted with increased weakness/lethargy after previously returning to normal neurological status admitted for possible neurosurgical intervention. On day 3 of admission…

• 0900: T = 37.3, HR = 103 , RR = 20 , BP = 96/63 (baseline 130’s systolic)

• 1500: T = 36.9, HR = 73, RR = 16, BP = 91/56

• 2045: T = 39.9

, HR = 103 , BP = 70/40

– Temps: 39.2  38.2  38.2

– BP’s: 70/40  500cc bolus ordered --112/86

– RN notes dark urine with output <100c -- repeat 64/42  500cc bolus given

– Repeat BP -70’s systolic  no further action taken – deferred to day team

– No lactate drawn, blood cultures drawn

Septic Shock  broad spectrum antibiotics = ~12 hours

Current state of Sepsis at UH-CMC

• Current state of Sepsis at UH-CMC

– AVERAGE time recognition as SIRS positive to Sepsis diagnose/treat =

18 hours

– Variation in recognition time: 10hrs  2 days

*by chart review, excludes ICU, Mac and Peds

Intelligence through UHCare

• Physician

Notification

• CDI Prompt

Quality

• SIRS Alert Pilot

• Sepsis Order Set

• VTE assessment

• Smart Peds meds

• Antimicrobial rationalization

Analytics Efficiency

• Dashboards

• Care Guides

HRM Waves

Wave concept

– DRG Groupings

– Prioritized (strategic, financial, leadership, system)

– 16 week focus followed by implementation

– Steady state mgmt.

– Disciplined tracking of outcome metrics

A Sea Change in Treating Heart Attacks

Improvements 2003-2013

• Death rate down 38%

• 2007 - AHA goal of Rx within 90 mins

• Median time in US now 61 mins

• Medicare generated national database of times

• Re-engineered care - In field EKG

Kolata G. New York Times – June 19, 2015

20 Current

Harrington

HVI Sites

Lake

Ashtabula

Cuyahoga Geauga

Portage

• Harrington HVI Programs now at Elyria and Parma

• Harrington HVI Programs planned at Portage & Ashland

Results: D2B Quality Improvement

120

100

99

80

60

40

Door-to-Balloon Time (median, min)

81

Pre-hospital

ECG transmission

70

65

CMC GMC AMC

63

80

54

49

86

64

HHVI-GMC

PCI Lead

70

59

51

57

50

61

20

0

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

2011: Ahuja opens, Geauga PCI without surgery onsite

ACC/AHA 90 min

Best Practice 60 min

Big Med – Atul Gawande

“ But the “casual dining sector” as it is known, plays a central role in the ecosystem of eating,…..The ideas start out in elite, upscale restaurants in major cities. You could think of them as research restaurants, akin to research hospitals. Then the casual dining chains re-engineer them for affordable delivery to millions. Does health care need something like this?”

New Yorker Aug 13, 2012

System Hospital OB Care, Volume/2014

(Maternal Level of Care, 1 - 4)

• UHCMC (MacDonald) 4,508 (4)

• Geauga (GMC) 1,115 (2)

• Elyria (EMH) 876 (2)

• St John (SJMC) 828 (2)

• Robinson (RMH) 680 (2)

• Parma (PMC) 448 (2)

Guiding principles

• Establish system-wide care paths for labor induction, fetal monitoring, and conduct of labor modified from MAC for community hospital setting.

• Team-oriented strategies lead to decreased communication errors and a positive work environment

• Changes in culture embraced from within each institution by their own champions

• 15 system wide “requirements” for delivering OB care in UH hospitals

• Objective metric of outcomes – serious safety occurrence measured system wide.

To Heal. To Teach. To Discover.

QUESTIONS?

Download