Piaget The father of constructivism and conceptual change theory Is the mind really like a computer? Quotes from college student exams & papers: (taken from Non Campus Mentis by Anders Henriksson) “Old Testament profits include Moses, Amy, and Confucius” “Martin Luther Junior’s famous ‘If I had a hammer’ speech” “Joan of Arc was famous as Noah’s wife” “The airplane was invented and first flown by the Marx brothers” “The Boston Tea Party was held at Pearl Harbor” “Judyism had one big God named ‘Yahoo’” Constructivism When ever we take in new information, we interpret, distort, elaborate, and impose meaning on it. QuickTime™ and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture. We never encode information in a pure, unaltered form. Constructivism When we recall information, we often distort, elaborate, and transform it. There is no pure, unaltered memory recall. We can even construct memories of things that never happened - and believe they’re true! Piaget The Father of Constructivism Children are active and motivated learners. Through their action, they construct schemas. A set of perceptions, ideas, and/or actions, that we construct and use to understand and respond to the world. Ex. “Fast food joint”schema. What were some of the unique schemas that the kids had? Where might these schemas have come from? Piaget These schemas affect how we make sense of the world and learn new things. Learning is not so much a process of acquiring new knowledge, but of reconstructing our existing schemas. Assimilation - fitting new info into existing schemas, often by distorting, transforming, and imposing meaning on the information. Accommodation - modifying, transforming, and reconstructing existing schemas. Piaget A disturbed mind is a good thing! Disequilibrium - your schemas don’t match up with the world (cognitive dissonance). (Hopefully!) this lead to a restructuring (accommodation) of your schemas. Which then leads to equilibrium again. This process is known as equilibration. And Piaget believed equilibration is what makes you smart - it leads to the development of more complex levels of thought (e.g., critical thinking, abstract thinking). Equilibration Demo Did we see examples of assimilation with the kids? What about equilibration? Did they ever express disequilibrium and accommodate their schemas? We cannot receive knowledge -- only construct it. A teacher cannot give knowledge -only foster its development. Behaviorism gave us the scientific revolution in psychology, Information Processing gave us the cognitive revolution. Now Piaget gives us the Constructivist revolution. Implications Peer Puzzle Activity What are the implications of students having schemas different from yours? Metaphors for Constructivism Painting with watercolors. Growing a garden. Change in an ecosystem. Duckworth Article Discussion Questions What type of learning does Duckworth value? Why? What type of instructional model does she seem to value? Why? How does her view of learning and instruction relate to Piaget? Problem-based Learning Instead of presenting content, present a problem that students can explore. Carefully design the problem so that solving it will lead students to engage with the content you want them to learn. MAKE SURE THEY WILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO PUT FORTH AND TEST THEIR IDEAS. Provide appropriate guidance and scaffolding (this is getting into social constructivism) Conceptual Change What is a misconception? What misconception do students in the article have about heat? What misconceptions do students have in the video? What misconceptions did the kids who visited our class have? Where do misconceptions come from? Where might the heat, phases of the moon, reflected light, and other misconceptions come from? Why do individuals hold onto misconceptions? Why do some students in the article and video hold onto their misconceptions? Reasons for holding on to misconceptions Pride; don’t like to be wrong Mistrust source of new idea. Stick to what makes SENSE! New idea doesn’t make sense. Comfort. Change is uncomfortable. Risky Takes work! We’re lazy. Lack of motivation. Who cares? Hard-core ideas vs. protective belt ideas Language Reasons for holding on to misconceptions Uncomfortable to be in a state of not knowing. Believe it’s true! Stubborn about being wrong. Our beliefs are connected. Changing one belief may cause Chaos. Prior belief MAKES SENSE. New idea might NOT make sense. Change takes work. We’re lazy. Might question the source of the new idea. Source of the prior idea may be powerful Hard-core vs. protective belt beliefs Prior idea has time on its side. Reasons for holding on to misconceptions Richer network in brain. New idea is just some abstract thing out there. It MAKES SENSE! Habit Tied to particular experience/situation. Part of personality, values, identity Hard core beliefs vs. protective belt beliefs Discount evidence, opinions, ideas that are different Reluctant to change. Change is uncomfortable. Change takes time (time for change in network) Pride; stubborn. We like to be right! Change is hard. We’re lazy. Prior belief may be socially embedded. Conceptual Change In the video, the girl often first gives a correct explanation. But when pressed, her bizarre misconceptions come out. What is going on? How do misconceptions relate to Piaget’s ideas (schemas, assimilation, accommodation, equilibration)? Demo Conditions needed for conceptual change: Dissatisfaction with existing idea New idea must make sense New idea must be plausible New idea must appear fruitful Implications Given that We construct schemas based on our experience (Piaget), we learn and make sense of the world according to our existing schemas (Piaget), and we resist changing our existing schemas (conceptual change theory), what are the implications of people having different experiences? How can this knowledge help us understand what goes on in the world? Implications Conceptual change theory states that we resist changing our existing ideas. I recently saw a program about two teenage age singers who were being raised to believe in white supremacist ideas. Is there anything you could do to try to change their beliefs? What could you try? Teaching for Conceptual Change What advice do they give in the video about dealing with misconceptions? How does the teacher in the article teach for conceptual change? Conceptual Change Instructional Model 1. Identify misconceptions. 2. Convince students that existing beliefs are inadequate. Challenge beliefs Direct confrontation: “The seasons are not caused by the earth getting closer to the sun!” Critical questioning: “How can it be winter in New Zealand when it is summer in the United States?” (better option) Engage students in inquiry experiences where they can test their ideas and receive disconfirming evidence.[note: this is problem-based learning] Conceptual Change Instructional Model 3. Motivate students to learn correct explanations. Show them the usefulness of the correct explanations In other words, help students have a meaningful, transformative experiences with the correct explanations. Designing an Inquiry Experience Choose a topic in your subject area. What problem could you present to your students that relates to this topic? How will you provide students with the opportunity to put forth and test their ideas? How will the students engage in the processes of assimilation and accommodation? Relationship between experience and learning Prior Experience Schemes Exploratory experience Accommodation of schemas cognitive development