Piaget
The father of constructivism and
conceptual change theory
Is the mind really
like a computer?
Quotes from college student exams & papers:
(taken from Non Campus Mentis by Anders Henriksson)
“Old Testament profits include Moses, Amy, and Confucius”
“Martin Luther Junior’s famous ‘If I had a hammer’ speech”
“Joan of Arc was famous as Noah’s wife”
“The airplane was invented and first flown by the Marx
brothers”
“The Boston Tea Party was held at Pearl Harbor”
“Judyism had one big God named ‘Yahoo’”
Constructivism
When ever we take in new information, we
interpret, distort, elaborate, and impose
meaning on it.
QuickTime™ and a
TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
We never encode information in a pure,
unaltered form.
Constructivism
When we recall information, we often
distort, elaborate, and transform it.
There is no pure, unaltered memory
recall.
We can even construct memories of things
that never happened - and believe they’re
true!
Piaget The Father of Constructivism
Children are active and motivated
learners.
Through their action, they construct
schemas.
A set of perceptions, ideas, and/or actions, that we
construct and use to understand and respond to the
world.
Ex. “Fast food joint”schema.
What were some of the unique schemas
that the kids had?
Where might these schemas have come
from?
Piaget
These schemas affect how we make
sense of the world and learn new things.
Learning is not so much a process of
acquiring new knowledge, but of
reconstructing our existing schemas.
Assimilation - fitting new info into existing
schemas, often by distorting, transforming,
and imposing meaning on the information.
Accommodation - modifying, transforming,
and reconstructing existing schemas.
Piaget
A disturbed mind is a good thing!
Disequilibrium - your schemas don’t match up with
the world (cognitive dissonance).
(Hopefully!) this lead to a restructuring
(accommodation) of your schemas.
Which then leads to equilibrium again.
This process is known as equilibration. And Piaget
believed equilibration is what makes you smart - it
leads to the development of more complex levels of
thought (e.g., critical thinking, abstract thinking).
Equilibration Demo
Did we see examples of assimilation with
the kids?
What about equilibration? Did they ever
express disequilibrium and accommodate
their schemas?
We cannot receive knowledge -- only
construct it.
A teacher cannot give knowledge -only foster its development.
Behaviorism gave us the scientific revolution in
psychology, Information Processing gave us the
cognitive revolution. Now Piaget gives us the
Constructivist revolution.
Implications
Peer Puzzle Activity
What are the implications of students
having schemas different from yours?
Metaphors for Constructivism
Painting with watercolors.
Growing a garden.
Change in an ecosystem.
Duckworth Article Discussion Questions
What type of learning does Duckworth
value? Why?
What type of instructional model does she
seem to value? Why?
How does her view of learning and
instruction relate to Piaget?
Problem-based Learning
Instead of presenting content, present a
problem that students can explore.
Carefully design the problem so that solving it
will lead students to engage with the content
you want them to learn.
MAKE SURE THEY WILL HAVE THE
OPPORTUNITY TO PUT FORTH AND TEST
THEIR IDEAS.
Provide appropriate guidance and scaffolding
(this is getting into social constructivism)
Conceptual Change
What is a misconception?
What misconception do students in the article have
about heat?
What misconceptions do students have in the video?
What misconceptions did the kids who visited our class
have?
Where do misconceptions come from?
Where might the heat, phases of the moon, reflected
light, and other misconceptions come from?
Why do individuals hold onto misconceptions?
Why do some students in the article and video hold onto
their misconceptions?
Reasons for holding on to
misconceptions
Pride; don’t like to be wrong
Mistrust source of new idea.
Stick to what makes SENSE!
New idea doesn’t make sense.
Comfort. Change is uncomfortable.
Risky
Takes work! We’re lazy.
Lack of motivation. Who cares?
Hard-core ideas vs. protective belt ideas
Language
Reasons for holding on to
misconceptions
Uncomfortable to be in a state of not knowing.
Believe it’s true! Stubborn about being wrong.
Our beliefs are connected. Changing one belief may
cause Chaos.
Prior belief MAKES SENSE.
New idea might NOT make sense.
Change takes work. We’re lazy.
Might question the source of the new idea.
Source of the prior idea may be powerful
Hard-core vs. protective belt beliefs
Prior idea has time on its side.
Reasons for holding on to
misconceptions
Richer network in brain.
New idea is just some abstract thing out there.
It MAKES SENSE!
Habit
Tied to particular experience/situation.
Part of personality, values, identity
Hard core beliefs vs. protective belt beliefs
Discount evidence, opinions, ideas that are different
Reluctant to change. Change is uncomfortable.
Change takes time (time for change in network)
Pride; stubborn. We like to be right!
Change is hard. We’re lazy.
Prior belief may be socially embedded.
Conceptual Change
In the video, the girl often first gives a correct
explanation. But when pressed, her bizarre
misconceptions come out. What is going
on?
How do misconceptions relate to Piaget’s
ideas (schemas, assimilation,
accommodation, equilibration)?
Demo
Conditions needed for
conceptual change:
Dissatisfaction with existing idea
New idea must make sense
New idea must be plausible
New idea must appear fruitful
Implications
Given that
We construct schemas based on our experience
(Piaget),
we learn and make sense of the world according to
our existing schemas (Piaget),
and we resist changing our existing schemas
(conceptual change theory),
what are the implications of people having
different experiences?
How can this knowledge help us understand
what goes on in the world?
Implications
Conceptual change theory states that we
resist changing our existing ideas.
I recently saw a program about two
teenage age singers who were being
raised to believe in white supremacist
ideas.
Is there anything you could do to try to
change their beliefs? What could you try?
Teaching for Conceptual Change
What advice do they give in the video about
dealing with misconceptions?
How does the teacher in the article teach for
conceptual change?
Conceptual Change Instructional Model
1. Identify misconceptions.
2. Convince students that existing beliefs
are inadequate.
Challenge beliefs
Direct confrontation: “The seasons are not caused by the earth
getting closer to the sun!”
Critical questioning: “How can it be winter in New Zealand
when it is summer in the United States?” (better option)
Engage students in inquiry experiences where
they can test their ideas and receive disconfirming
evidence.[note: this is problem-based learning]
Conceptual Change Instructional Model
3. Motivate students to learn correct
explanations.
Show them the usefulness of the correct
explanations
In other words, help students have a meaningful,
transformative experiences with the correct
explanations.
Designing an Inquiry Experience
Choose a topic in your subject area.
What problem could you present to your
students that relates to this topic?
How will you provide students with the
opportunity to put forth and test their ideas?
How will the students engage in the
processes of assimilation and
accommodation?
Relationship between experience
and learning
Prior Experience
Schemes
Exploratory experience
Accommodation of schemas
cognitive development