Work, Meaning, and Multiple Identities Framing Growing interest around the inter-relationships among identity / identification, meaning, and work Understanding how we make it all work: multiple roles, multiple identities, multiple meanings Designing new study with several colleagues at U of Illinois (such as Teresa) – want general and specific feedback Goals To examine how organizational practices, individual differences in work orientation, and organizational affiliation contribute to distinct types of identification. To examine the effect of these distinct types of identification (4) on organizational outcomes. Model: The “Big Picture” Organizational Practices • work • social context Affiliation • proximity • temporal factors • administrative control • social linkages Organizational Identification Work Orientation • job • career (A) & (B) • calling Patterns of Identification Experienced Meaningfulness • in working • at work Professional Identification Low High Low Nonidentified Professional Identifier High Org. Identifier Dual Identifier Organizational Commitment Org. Citizenship Behaviors Job Satisfaction Proposed Context Medical context (2 health care systems – 1 religiously affiliated) Numerous professional groups Different backgrounds, training, certification, status orientation, job perceptions, ideologies Different levels of identification with profession and organization Identification Patterns Organizational & Professional Assume that Identification is not “fixed pie” (can simultaneously identify with numerous targets) Professional identifiers (e.g., cosmopolitans) Organizational identifiers (e.g., locals) Non-identifiers (within workplace) Dual identifiers Organizational Practices Work: changing what members do, changing the nature of the job tasks meaningfulness in working stronger link to professional identification? Social Context: changing various aspects of the social context (e.g., culture, work relationships) meaningfulness at work stronger link to organizational identification? Work Orientation Job: economic focus Career A: achievement focus – advancement within an organization predictive of ‘Organization Identifiers’? Career B: achievement focus – advancement across organizations predictive of ‘Non-Identifiers’? predictive of ‘Professional Identifiers?’ Calling: fulfillment, transcendence predictive of ‘Dual Identifiers’ or ‘Professional Identifiers’? Affiliation Proximity Temporal Factors Interaction is Full time vs. Co-located vs. Part time Not co-located Administrative Control Social Linkages Not paid vs. Paid Contact with firm vs. other organizational payroll others is high or low Continuous vs. Interrupted Size of network internal external Short-term vs. Long-term Exclusive vs. Not Exclusive Adapted from Pfeffer and Baron (1988) Affiliation Still working on specific hypotheses for affiliation In general, we believe that lack of proximity, and working alone will have a larger influence on organizational identification than professional identification Experienced Meaningfulness Want to assess: meaningfulness in working meaningfulness at work No “set measures” that we know of – likely be the focus of qualitative analysis Need to determine whether or not to “split” different aspects of meaningfulness at work (e.g., ‘culture’ and ‘relationships’) Organizational Commitment Might different types of commitment be related to different identification patterns (and work orientations)? Continuance – non-identifiers (and job-oriented)? Affective – organizational and dual (and career A)? Normative – professional and dual (and career B and calling)? Other Outcomes OCB’s: e.g., task conscientiousness, helping others, participating in organizational politics, positive attitudes Job Satisfaction Need Specific Feedback About… Career A and B “Non-traditional” outcome variables Does this distinction make sense Will we get differences between career B and callings? Can we do more than OCBs and job satisfaction? Logic of predictions? Missing aspects of affiliation? Capturing meaningfulness in and at work? Look for “transcendent” practices? Thank you! Meaningfulness in and at Work (Pratt & Ashforth 2003) Meaningfulness in Working Practices Meaningfulness at Work Practices Role: What Am I Doing? Membership: Where Do I Belong? Identity: Who Am I? Meaningfulness: Why Am I Here? Organizational Practices Meaning at Work Meaning in Working Job redesign Employee involvement Path-goal leadership Nurturing callings Building cultures, identities, ideologies Transformational, charismatic or Recruitment visionary leadership Selection Socialization Building communities Providing a cosmology Promoting psychological safety Enacting with integrity Transcendence