Following Christ Faithfully: Unexpected Insights from Psychology WEEK 1: WHAT IS “TRUE RELIGION”? Introduction to the Series Problem of self-serving bias We tend to see ourselves as better than we are E.g., 94% of college professors think they’re above average And miss many weak spots Psalm 50.21 We may be inclined to think God is like us rather than apprehend God as He really is Introduction Psychology overlaps theology Nature of persons Development Thinking Social relationships Emotions Goals and purpose Behavior Theology Psychology Plan for the Course Psychology has looked at Christianity scientifically While there is much misunderstanding (e.g., Freud) There is much we might learn We will take some insights and reflect on them in light of Scripture What is “true religion”? Overview of Today Current climate Spiritual is good Personal experience is good Religious organizations are bad Spiritual is private Religion is bad Religion is public, thus bad What does the religion vs. spirituality debate mean to us? How does it match James 1:1-27? Etymology Religion Spirituality From Latin “religio” To tie or bind Thus a bond Between God and a person But also among people who share belief Historically used to cover all areas of faith, practice, and experience From “spiritus” “breath” or “life” Key is being immaterial Roots in dualism of matter vs. spirit (e.g. deacons attend to body; elders to soul) In cultural use, does NOT imply the Holy Spirit Thus I prefer “Christian Spirituality” Spirituality Forms of spirituality in our culture Transcendent Ephemeral connection to the environment Sense of intimacy with the divine Secular means “of the time” and thus focus on now, not eternity Religion moves to be utilitarian, not valued in itself Disrespect for institutions Something more out there…felt when looking at sunset or stars at night Religious Cultural secularism Connection to people Nature Humanist Roots of the “spiritual turn” And increase in self focus Thus many churches try to accommodate this and meet “felt needs” Religion becomes spirituality Enables movement of R/S to private domain Separated from the public domain Explains current political climate (and Muslim difference) Contrasts Religion (Christianity) Institutional External Objective Structural Fixed Frozen Requires God “bad” Commitment to Bible Moral obligations “costly grace” Community-focused Purposeful Spirituality Individual Internal Subjective Functional Flexible Dynamic No deity required “good” Freedom of thought Serves personal well-being “cheap grace” Individual-focused Useful Spiritual Only Group is Growing in the U.S. Religious vs. Spiritual R and S R, not S S, not R neither Religious vs. Spiritual The S not R group sees religion (such as our church) as negative, so less likely to: Attend church Pray Hold orthodox beliefs More likely to: Be independent Go to group spiritual experiences (e.g. retreats) See religion as separate from spirituality Emerging Group Spiritual against religion Feel people need to be freed from religion Promote spirituality and talk down religion Common secular position Serves to privatize faith And free from moral obligations This Misses Important Things Religion actually supports individuals in many ways While still promoting relationships With God In marriage and family In churches Spirituality generally is more self-centered and subjective Searching for God Spirituality encourages a search for something sacred And may value the journey more than the destination Religion, particularly Christianity, is a seeking to draw near to God In a redemption-based relationship And encompasses all of life (work, meaning, identity, and sense of belonging) within it Religious institutions – e.g., FPCC – promote all of these Plus add moral dimensions to life But… IDEAS HAVE CONSEQUENCES IN THE “REAL” WORLD EXAMPLE: Tolerance versus Love Some thoughts, with thanks to D.A. Carson’s, The Intolerance of Tolerance Recent change in the meaning: Old tolerance: accepting the existence of different views Tolerate the person; debate ideas New tolerance: accepting different views and not debating Moves from admitting the right of people to differ to seeing the differences as unimportant, with other views being as true (or untrue) as one’s own So, saying Jesus is the only way to God is tolerant in the old view, but INTOLERANT in the new Historically, Christians could differ with others on beliefs but honor them as humans made in God’s image Intolerance is now being used to silence speaking out on faith Examples of “Tolerance” Universities, historically bastion of free speech, now limit one’s freedom to speak out. E.g. professors have been fired for saying something that offends others … even if it is not hate speech Media: OK with, say, Catholics reaching out in charity, but shun them when stand on issues like abortion/birth control Sexual issues: while Christians have to an extent asked for it, to disagree with gay marriage is not a position of tolerance, and may be equated with homophobia, even if the person saying it genuinely shows Christian love ON BOTH SIDES, CALLING NAMES IS NOT TOLERANT So, increasingly it is intolerant to say anything is right or wrong that violates “intolerance” Though doubtless promoters of tolerance are intolerant themselves Homeschooling Christian fundamentalists the “mock attackers” in terrorism drills in in NJ and Michigan WHY? Simply because of convictions, they are seen as intolerant and thus a suitable “enemy” While releasing illegal alien criminals, US government deported German immigrant homeschoolers who came here for religious freedom to educate their children So, increasingly those in power are silencing opposing views Roots of Tolerance Based on the notion that there is no true truth So, your personal truth is OK as long as you leave mine alone…and don’t try to influence public policy Discourages discussion No discussion of WHY tolerance is a virtue; it is assumed to be the ONLY virtue, or the greatest of all However, if no rational discussion, power becomes the key to enforcing your opinion Interesting, as tolerance now is Intolerant of those who differ with it (thus homeschoolers are seen as likely target for terrorist attacks and thus vilified) E.g., American Counseling Association How does EXCLUSION promote INCLUSION??? Impact of Tolerance Privatizing our religion No place for it is the public domain Interpreting Christianity in light of tolerance Arguing that God/Jesus are examples of tolerance Yet Jesus was quite intolerant of the Pharisees, and spoke of condemnation for those who seek God apart from Him Buddhist ideas are popular because they don’t claim a right and wrong Good thing! Their founder deserted his wife to pursue spirituality GK Chesterton reportedly said; “Tolerance is the virtue of a man without convictions” Though now tolerance is used to push certain convictions. If believers had all been tolerant in today’s sense, there would be no martyrs Being Public in Our Faith Summary of American tolerance: Rooted in postmodern disbelief in truth Indifferent to right or wrong Or enforces opinion by power Cynical disregard for truth Distances from others IN CONTRAST, Christian love: Cares for the other Yet believes truth is seeing as God sees Including that persons of all beliefs are made in God’s image Discussion of differences is loving, drawing closer to God/each other The “meekness of wisdom” Jas 3:13 We share our beliefs and doctrines from love, not in effort to “prove” ourselves Augustine on Love "If you keep silent, keep silent by love: if you speak, speak by love; if you correct, correct by love; if you pardon, pardon by love; let love be rooted in you, and from the root nothing but good can grow. Love and do what you will. Love endures in adversity, is moderate in prosperity; brave under harsh sufferings, cheerful in good works; utterly reliable in temptation, utterly open-handed in hospitality; as happy as can be among true brothers and sisters, as patient as you can get among the false ones. The soul of the scriptures, the force of prophecy, the saving power of the sacraments, the fruit of faith, the wealth of the poor, the life of the dying. Love is all.” Saint Augustine of Hippo What Can We Learn from Religion v. Spirituality? Infiltration of secularism into culture Contra Islam Individualism pulls self- promoting pieces from Christian faith and calls it spirituality Freeing people of obligations to other people AND from moral standards of religious faith Using tolerance to justify sin and remove debate Effectively privatizing faith Biblical Teaching The Holy Spirit is a Person in the Trinity Not a vague, ephemeral feeling I stress Christian Spirituality when speaking of the work of the Spirit in our lives Even part of the role of Spirit is to convict us of moral failures So, we have sin as a category James 1:1-27 True religion, then, is in Being in relationship with God by forgiveness of our sins In the power of the Spirit, acting to serve others Bear One Another's Burdens: Brothers, if anyone is caught in any transgression, you who are spiritual should restore him in a spirit of gentleness. Keep watch on yourself, lest you too be tempted. Bear one another's burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ. For if anyone thinks he is something, when he is nothing, he deceives himself. (Galatians 6:1-3 ESV) Applications Watch your language! How are you using the terms? How might that lead to misunderstanding? Consider cultural and political change How is Christianity being privatized? How has tolerance impacted you? What does that mean for our children? Recovering the language of sin Christian believe that God is Holy and we are sinners Repentance is still in our vocabulary Galatians 6 challenges us to mind our sin and that of others Moral obligations Good devotions do not make for good religion What more should we do to work out our faith? And speak of its truth?