Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter The Legal Context of Employment Decisions 3 Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Discrimination Disparate Adverse Treatment Impact Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Disparate Treatment Intentional McDonnell Douglas vs. Greene Types Direct Evidence Circumstantial Evidence Mixed Motive Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Adverse Impact Unintentional Discrimination Griggs vs. Duke Power Co. Standards unrelated to job High School Diploma Wunderlich Test Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Answering Charges of Discrimination Questions to ask about the charges filed against your company Was the charge filed within the time allowed? Does the charge name the proper employer? Is your company subject to federal anti-discrimination statutes? Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Hostile Environment Meritor Savings Bank vs. Vinson Employers liable for actions of customers (e.g. Accounting firms) Exercise reasonable care / act promptly Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Quid Pro Quo Harassment Burlington Industries vs. Ellerth Employer liable for Supervisor misconduct even when unaware. Defense – Reasonable steps to prevent harassment. Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Sexual Harassment Hostile Environment Intimidating, hostile or offensive environment; Unwelcome advances. Quid You Pro Quo give me this: I’ll give you that. Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Preparing a Response to Charges of Discrimination When preparing a response you should consider the following: Agree to mediate the charge Make a settlement offer to the charging party Prepare a company position statement The position statement should include the following: Brief description of the company’s business Brief description of your understanding of the charging party’s position Brief description of rules, policies, or procedures you think are relevant Chronological description of all events leading up to and including the event Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Discriminatory Practices Job applicants may not be rejected based on the following Race National Origin Age Sex Physical Disability Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. BFOQ Examples? Seamstress Spa Attendant Sperm Donor Wet Nurse Discrimination for Gender OK when necessary for the operation of the enterprise. Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Eighty / Twenty Rule Total Interviewed 100 Number Hired Percentage % 40 40 50 Minority 20 50 Minority 15 40 OK 32 % Minimum 30 Not OK Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Federal Enforcement Agencies The EEOC and the OFCCP enforce federal discrimination policy EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) Headed-up by five members Only three can be from the same political party Positions appointed by the United States President Serve five year terms OFCCP (Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs) Uses and enforces many of the same policies and procedures as the EEOC Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. EEOC Guidelines EECO Complaints are considered under the following criteria: Does the complaint fall with 180 days of alleged discrimination Was the complaint resolved within 60 days Was there are voluntary reconciliation of the complaint Is the company a public employer Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Make up of Primary Discrimination Case Law Employment Case Law Unfair discrimination based on race, sex, age, religion, or national origin Seniority Testing and interviewing Personal history information Preferential Selection Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Beyond the Position Statement The following courses of action may be taken by the EEOC or other governing body following the position statement of a company Make a determination without requesting additional information from the company Request additional documentation or other information from the company Hold a fact finding conference, usually during an investigation on the company’s premises Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. EEOC Findings If the company is not found in violation A no cause finding is issued The accusing employee has 90 days to file a law suit in court If the company is found in violation A cause finding is issued The at fault company will be invited to a conciliation Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. A Complete List of Discrimination Acts and Laws Thirteenth and fourteenth amendment to the Constitution Civil Right Acts of 1866 and 1871 Equal Pay Act of 1963 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Age Discrimination and In Employment Act of 1967 (as amended in 1996) Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 American with Disabilities Act of 1990 Civil Right Act of 1991 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 Executive Order 11246, 11375, and 11478 Rehabilitation Act of 1973 Uniform Service Employment and Re-employment Rights Act of 1994 Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.