Truman Doctrine & Marshall Plan February 21, 1947, the British Embassy informed the U.S. State Department officials that Great Britain could no longer provide financial aid to Greece and Turkey (American aid was in many ways a replacement for British aid) Secretary of State Dean Acheson realized that the United States must step into the breach and consulted Arthur Vandenberg, the Republican chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Truman Doctrine Introduction At a meeting with Truman and Vandenberg in the White House, Acheson put the aid request in the context of the larger struggle by using a metaphor about how one or two rotten apples could spoil a barrel Acheson oversaw the process of writing the presidential speech to define the new doctrine Truman Doctrine Introduction (cont.) In Greece, the National Liberation Front, a Communist-led insurgency, was rising under the country’s worsening economic and political conditions and the country was in the midst of a civil war that started in 1944 In Turkey, a weak government faced Soviet pressure to share control of the strategic Dardanelle Straits Truman Doctrine Threats Address before a joint session of Congress on March 12, 1947 Listed some of the problems Greece was facing, such as a ruined infrastructure, thousands of villages destroyed, inflation, and widespread starvation “The very existence of the Greek state is today threatened by the terrorist activities of several thousand armed men, led by Communists, who defy the government's authority …” Truman Doctrine Truman’s speech “Greece must have assistance if it is to become a self-supporting and self-respecting democracy. The United States must supply that assistance… There is no other country to which democratic Greece can turn.” Rejected assistance from the United Nations because “the situation is an urgent one requiring immediate action and the United Nations and its related organizations are not in a position to extend help of the kind that is required.” Truman Doctrine Truman’s speech (cont.) “…the survival and integrity of the Greek nation are of grave importance in a much wider situation. If Greece should fall under the control of an armed minority, the effect upon its neighbor, Turkey, would be immediate and serious. Confusion and disorder might well spread throughout the entire Middle East.” Truman Doctrine Truman’s speech (cont.) More was at stake than Greece and Turkey, for if those two key states should fall, Communism would likely spread south to Iran and as far east as India Dean Acheson persuaded Congress to accept responsibility for supporting countries under communist pressure, or containment The decision was supported by Senator Arthur H. Vandenberg and the Republicans who controlled Congress Truman signed the act into law on May 22, 1947, which granted $400 million ($350 million to Greece and $50 million to Turkey) in military and economic aid Truman Doctrine Support & Passing military and economic aid ◦ Economic aid: repairing the infrastructure ◦ Military aid: military personnel supervising and helping with the reconstruction of these countries while training soldiers Truman Doctrine In Practice Shifted American foreign policy towards the Soviet Union to a policy of containment. Was the first in a succession of containment moves by the United States, followed by economic restoration of Western Europe through the Marshall Plan and military containment by the creation of NATO in 1949. ◦ Governments in Western Europe with powerful communist movements such as Italy and France were given a variety of assistance and encouraged to keep communist groups out of governments Truman Doctrine Effects Often cited by historians as the start of the Cold War. Also contributed to and became rationale for America's first involvements in the Vietnam War ◦ Starting shortly after the outbreak of the Korean War, Truman attempted to aid France's bid to hold onto its Vietnamese colonies. The United States supplied French forces with equipment and military advisors in order to combat Ho Chi Minh and anti-colonial communist revolutionaries Truman Doctrine Effects (cont.) Break Officially named the European Recovery Program (ERP) Primary plan of the United States for rebuilding the allied countries of Europe and repelling communism after World War II Named for United States Secretary of State George Marshall Largely the creation of State Department officials, especially William L. Clayton and George F. Kennan In operation for four fiscal years beginning in July 1947 Some $13 billion of economic and technical assistance— equivalent to around $180 billion in 2015—was given to help the recovery of the European countries that had joined in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Marshall Plan Overview The US hoped that it would not need to get involved in Europe to help the countries rebuild their economies and that the British and French, with help from their colonies, would quickly rebuild their economies By 1947, however, there was little progress, and the situation was aggravated by a series of cold winters High unemployment and food shortages led to strikes and unrest in several countries Marshall Plan Leading up to/Before the Marshall Plan (cont.) In European nations, the economies were well below their pre-war levels agricultural production was 83% of 1938 levels, industrial production was 88%, and exports only 59% The Iron Curtain cut off Western Europe from Eastern Europe, not allowing for the transfer of food from East to West There was a shortage of coal, leading to hundreds of deaths by freezing The humanitarian desire to end these problems was one motivation for the plan Marshall Plan Leading up to/Before the Marshall Plan (cont.) The US was the only major power whose infrastructure had not been significantly harmed 1. Entered war late 2. Suffered limited damage to its own territory 3. Gold reserves and massive agricultural and manufacturing base were still intact 4. The war years were a period of fast economic growth The long-term health of the U.S. economy was dependent on trade; continued prosperity required markets to export surplus goods ◦ Marshall Plan aid would largely be used by the Europeans to buy manufactured goods and raw materials from the US Marshall Plan Leading up to/Before the Marshall Plan (cont.) Another strong motivating factor for the United States was the beginning of the Cold War, though when it was implemented it was not yet an overriding concern In both France and Italy, the Communist party had seen significant electoral success in the postwar elections To George Kennan, the Marshall Plan was the centerpiece of the new doctrine of containment Marshall Plan Leading up to/Before the Marshall Plan (cont.) Long before Marshall’s others had suggested European reconstruction: ◦ US Secretary of State James F. Byrnes presented an early version of the plan during a speech given on September 6, 1946 ◦ Undersecretary of State Dean Acheson had made a major speech on the issue, which was mostly ignored Marshall Plan Early Ideas Germany had long been the industrial giant of Europe, and its poverty held back the general European recovery Continued scarcity in Germany also led to considerable expenses for the occupying powers The above factors, combined with widespread public condemnation of the early plans after their leaking to the press, led to the rejection of previous plans By April 1947, Truman, Marshall, and Acheson were convinced of the need of the substantial quantities of aid from the United States Marshall Plan Rejection of Early Ideas In his speech to the graduating class of Harvard in 1947, Secretary of State George Marshall outlined the U.S. government’s preparedness to contribute to European recovery The speech contained virtually no details or numbers; its most important element was the call for the Europeans to meet and create their own plan for rebuilding Europe, and that the U.S. would then fund this plan Marshall Plan George Marshall’s Speech When British Foreign Secretary Ernest Bevin heard Marshall’s speech, he immediately contacted the French Foreign Minister Georges Bidault to begin preparing a European response They agreed that it would be necessary to invite the Soviets as the other major allied power Marshall’s speech had explicitly included an invitation to the Soviets, feeling that excluding them would have been too clear a sign of distrust Marshall Plan Soviet Rejection Stalin was at first cautiously interested in the plan and felt that the USSR would be able to dictate the terms of the aid He sent foreign minister Molotov to Paris to meet with Bevin and Bidault However, both the British and French were not genuinely interested in Soviet participation, and they presented Molotov with conditions that the Soviets could never accept ◦ Most important condition was that every country to join the plan would need to have its economic situation independently assessed, ◦ Any aid be accompanied by the creation of a unified European economy Marshall Plan Soviet Rejection (cont.) Molotov left Paris, rejecting the plan On July 12, a larger meeting was convened in Paris, with every country of Europe (with the exceptions of Spain, Andorra, San Marino, Monaco, and Liechtenstein) invited Stalin saw the Plan as a significant threat to Soviet control of Eastern Europe and believed that economic integration with the West would allow these countries to escape Soviet domination Czechoslovakia and Poland agreed to attend, but later declined to attend after Stalin talked to them The other Eastern European states immediately rejected the offer and Finland also declined in order to avoid antagonizing the Soviets Marshall Plan Soviet Rejection (cont.) 16 nations met in Paris to determine what form the American aid would take, and how it would be divided Each nation had its own concerns ◦ France - Germany not be rebuilt to its previous threatening power ◦ Benelux countries (Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg) – felt their prosperity depended on the revival of the German economy Marshall Plan Negotiations – insisted that their long-standing trading relationships with the Eastern Bloc not be disrupted and that their neutrality not be infringed Britain – insisted on special status, concerned that if it were treated equally with the devastated continental powers it would receive virtually no aid Americans – pushed the importance of free trade and European unity to form a bulwark against communism Scandinavian nations Marshall Plan Negotiations (cont.) Agreement was eventually reached and the Europeans send a reconstruction plan to Washington They asked for $22 billion in aid Truman cut this to $17 billion in the bill he presented to Congress The plan met sharp opposition in Congress, mostly from the isolationists who were weary of massive government spending Prominent men who opposed the plan include Robert A. Taft (R) and Henry A. Wallace (D) Marshall Plan Negotiations (cont.) The opposition was greatly reduced by the shock of the overthrow of the democratic government of Czechoslovakia in Febraury1948 Soon after a bill granting an initial $5 billion passed Congress with strong bipartisan support Congress would eventually donate $12.4 billion in aid over the four years of the plan Marshall Plan Negotiations (cont.) Truman signed the Marshall Plan into law on April 3, 1948, establishing the Economic cooperation Administration (ECA) to administer the program In the same year, the participating countries (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, West Germany, Great Britain, Greece, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States) signed an accord establishing a master coordinating agency, the Organization for European Economic Cooperation (later called the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD) Marshall Plan Implementation Marshall Plan Expenditures The Marshall Plan ended in 1951; any effort to extend it was halted by the growing cost of the Korean War and rearmament Republicans hostile to the plan had also gained seats in the 1950 Congressional elections Marshall Plan End