Quality Improvement Priorities for 2014/15 Consultation V1.0 Robin Sasaru, Quality Team Manager Chris McKeown, Effectiveness Officer January 2014 Quality Improvement Priorities for 2014/15 – consultation Consultation document We want you to shape our Quality Improvement Priorities for 2014/15. To do this, we will consult on the proposed changes to our priorities with: Service Users Staff Our membership Clinical Commissioning Groups, HealthWatch, and other stakeholders Why we are changing our priorities Over the last year we have completed the integration of adult health and social care teams, developed our children’s services directorate, developed a specialist services division, and acquired new sexual health services in Leicester. Externally, other developments have included: national reports in relation to the Francis Inquiry new guidance and priorities from the Department of Health, NHS England, and the Trust Development Authority Revised commissioning intentions from our commissioners. We want to ensure our Quality Improvement Priorities are still in line with these developments. We will record the rationale for any changes in our Quality Account 2013/14. We will report on progress against our 2013/14 priorities in full, whether or not we make any change for our 2014/15 priorities. What you can comment on We welcome comments on any part of this document. Specific questions are also included throughout the document. How to comment Please email your comments to quality@ssotp.nhs.uk by 20 February 2014. You can also call the Effectiveness Team to discuss any comments: Robin Sasaru, Quality Team Manager: 07718-118178 Chris McKeown, Effectiveness Officer: 01889-571479 Hayley Fidler, Effectiveness Assistant: 01889-571478 We also have two consultation events discussing our quality priorities (on 30 January and 7 February) – call us if you would like to attend. Page 2 of 21 Quality Improvement Priorities for 2014/15 – consultation Quality Improvement Priorities for 2014/15 Quality Accounts are annual reports to the public from providers of NHS healthcare about the quality of services they deliver. A Quality Account must include the organisations priorities for quality improvement for the coming financial year. As quality accounts are annual reports, there is an expectation of continuity between accounts over time. Organisations should reflect and report back on progress against priorities in future accounts. Where possible, providers should use indicators to demonstrate success in subsequent years.1 In line with the national guidance on quality accounts, the Partnership trust is taking a developmental approach to the Quality Improvement Priorities for 2014/15, by suggesting amendments to the priorities based on a review of guidance, national, health economy and service developments over the past year. National Guidance on quality accounts Current national guidance requires that Quality Improvement Priorities: Are developed with all members of the organisation and local stakeholders Reflect the three domains of quality (Safety, Effectiveness and Experience) Demonstrate continuity over time Include how progress to achieve the priorities will be monitored, measured and reported At least three improvement priorities (related to Safety, Effectiveness, and Experience) are required for 2014/15. National guidance suggests that a three to five priorities is a manageable amount. Additional national guidance on Quality Accounts has not been published up to 7 January 2014. 1 Quality Accounts Toolkit 2010/11, Department of Health Page 3 of 21 Quality Improvement Priorities for 2014/15 – consultation Business development priorities and commissioning intentions for 2014/15 National and local priorities from the draft 2-year operational high level summary plan Working towards achieving the Trust vision and model of care has placed the organisation in a strong position to respond to the transformation challenge faced by the NHS. Over the next two years we will build on our vision and model of care to deliver both the Health Outcomes Framework and the national ambition of effective integration between health and social care. In order to achieve this ambition we will use our experience and learning to; Further enhance our approach to supporting people with long term conditions Ensure our Quality Priorities lead to further improvements the experience of care and protect people from avoidable harm Provide care closer to home by working with partners to develop services that reduce the amount of time people spend avoidably in hospital Improve our skills and delivery of services for people with mental and physical health conditions Further enhance our support of people living independently at home following discharge from hospital Local Priorities We will develop our approach in line with the pressures facing our main Local Authority and Health Commissioners in Stoke on Trent and the North and South of Staffordshire to: Provide integrated services Maximise the use of resources Maintain the quality and safety of care in line with the Francis and other related reports Respond to the report of the Trust Special Administrators (TSA) at Mid Staffordshire Foundation Trust. We acknowledge that our commissioners have different levels of financial challenge and start from different baselines in terms of service delivery, which will result in service reviews and strategies for the decommissioning of some services to enable reinvestment in others. We will respond in innovative and flexible ways that support improvements in care and the most clinically and cost effective solutions for patients. Clinical Commissioning Group commissioning intentions We have reviewed the commissioning intentions of all of our commissioners with our operational divisions to align commissioning priorities and operational delivery. Key areas of commissioner focus in the north and south include; Focus on planned care and prevention Evaluation and further development of ILCTs and Intermediate care Page 4 of 21 Quality Improvement Priorities for 2014/15 – consultation Admission avoidance and reablement across health and social care Additional social care and domiciliary care provision Frail complex care Discharge systems and service reviews The development of End of Life services New pathways and models of care for Long term Conditions Children’s service We are developing our strategy for the use of assistive technology to provide innovative ways to support the delivery of care. In order to enable seamless care to be delivered flexibly and effectively we are developing strategic partnerships and business cases, with other local providers, to support joint working. We are also engaging with voluntary, independent and hospice sectors to develop relationships centred on the prime provider model. Divisional planning workshops Held in the summer 2013/14, these workshops looked at a frontline perspective on service development issues for 2014/15. Common themes align with national and Clinical Commissioning Group intentions in the following areas: Developing Integrated Locality Care Teams Case management services Admission avoidance / reablement Developing Hospital at Home Other significant theme areas include: Improving IT & data quality, including paperless records Use of digital health / assistive technology Outcomes Consultation questions Are there any other national, health economy or service priorities we should take account of? Page 5 of 21 Quality Improvement Priorities for 2014/15 – consultation Issues identified from the Francis report and related reports Six independent reviews which the Government commissioned to consider some of the key issues identified by the Inquiry Review into the Quality of Care and Treatment provided by 14 Hospital Trusts in England, led by Professor Sir Bruce Keogh, the NHS Medical Director in NHS England. The Cavendish Review: An Independent Review into Healthcare Assistants and Support Workers in the NHS and Social Care Settings, by Camilla Cavendish. A Promise to Learn – A Commitment to Act: Improving the Safety of Patients in England, by Professor Don Berwick. A Review of the NHS Hospitals Complaints System: Putting Patients Back in the Picture by Rt Hon Ann Clwyd MP and Professor Tricia Hart. Challenging Bureaucracy, led by the NHS Confederation. The report by the Children and Young People’s Health Outcomes Forum, cochaired by Professor Ian Lewis and Christine Lenehan. Since the Inquiry reported, the Government has already instigated a number of significant changes which will improve inspection, increase transparency, put a clear emphasis on compassion, standards and safety, increase accountability for failure, and build capability. The Care Quality Commission has consulted on a new system of ratings with patient care and safety at its heart. The Care Quality Commission has conducted a major consultation on a new set of fundamental standards: the inviolable principles of safe, effective and compassionate care that must underpin all care in the future. The fundamental standards will enable prosecutions of providers to occur in serious cases where patients have been harmed because of unsafe or poor care, without the need for an advance warning notice. For the first time, NHS England has published clinical outcomes by consultant for ten medical specialties and has also begun to publish data on the friends and family test. New nurse and midwifery leadership programmes have been developed from which 10,000 nurses and midwives will have benefitted by April 2015. Compassion in Practice has an action area dedicated to building and strengthening leadership. Major new action on the following vital areas: Transparent monthly reporting of ward-by-ward staffing levels and other safety measures. Page 6 of 21 Quality Improvement Priorities for 2014/15 – consultation All hospitals will clearly set out how patients and their families can raise concerns or complain, with independent support available from local HealthWatch or alternative organisations. Trusts will report quarterly on complaints data and lessons learned, and the Ombudsman will significantly increase the number of cases she considers. A statutory duty of candour on providers, and a professional duty of candour on individuals through changes to professional guidance and codes. The Government will consult on proposals about whether Trusts should reimburse a proportion or all of the NHS Litigation Authority’s compensation costs when they have not been open about a safety incident. A new Care Certificate to ensure that Healthcare Assistants and Social Care Support Workers have the right fundamental training and skills in order to give personal care to patients and service users. The Care Bill will introduce a new criminal offence applicable to care providers that supply or publish certain types of information that is false or misleading, where that information is required to comply with a statutory or other legal obligation Quality framework and supporting strategies Our Quality Framework, agreed during 2012/13, is our overall 5-year quality strategy. It sets our overall direction for quality and reiterates our core commitment to quality in health and social care. The Quality Framework aim is that all service users receive the highest quality of care, by ensuring that front line teams are empowered by the organisation to provide this. The Framework contains six quality goals, reflecting the unique makeup of our Trust. The Quality Framework is supported by three key strategies: Safety: Measuring and improving the organisational safety culture Effectiveness: Moving to Effective Outcomes Experience: Improving service user experience and developing service user involvement in quality improvement These strategies and work streams detail the policies, systems and processes that we will use to achieve our six quality goals. The Safety, Effectiveness, and Experience strategies were agreed in 2013/14. Page 7 of 21 Quality Improvement Priorities for 2014/15 – consultation Priority 1: Safety – reducing avoidable pressure ulcers Current aim: no avoidable grade 2/3/4 pressure ulcers developed in our care. Current measures Measures we will report to our Board 2013/14 target Number of pressure ulcers reported as grade Zero grade 2/3/4 avoidable 3 and 4 pressure ulcers and reported as pressure ulcers developed in our serious incidents care (max = 26 in community) Number of pressure ulcers reported as avoidable grade 3 / 4 pressure ulcers developed in our care and reported in our care and reported as serious incidents. Zero grade 2/3/4 avoidable pressure ulcers developed in our care All pressure ulcers for people in our care and Increase in number of incidents reported and reduction in the reported as adverse incident proportion of serious incidents / all reported incidents Other measures we will use to track progress Total number of adverse incidents reported (all incidents) Quarterly increase in number of incidents reported Percentage of reported incidents classified as Quarterly reduction in proportion of serious incidents / all reported serious incidents incidents Key points Nationally, Trusts will continue to be encouraged to use the NHS Safety Thermometer to help drive improvements in some key patient safety areas: pressure ulcers, falls resulting from harm, catheter-associated infections and venous thromboembolism. Also, NHS England will be working with other national bodies to make patient safety data more accessible to all. NHS England will begin to publish never events data monthly (by April 2014). NHS England is leading work to develop proposals for ensuring every Trust undertakes retrospective case note reviews of patient deaths according to a consistent methodology to further encourage learning from adverse events. Most service specifications require the Trust to adhere to national guidance and best practice around incident management, including reporting of serious incidents to commissioners Page 8 of 21 Quality Improvement Priorities for 2014/15 – consultation Improvement against the safety thermometer, particularly pressure ulcers, will remain a national CQUIN requirement for 2014/152 The NHS National Contract 2014/15 technical guidance reinforces the position that “… commissioners and providers should recognise the primary importance of encouraging and supporting the reporting of incidents in order to promote learning and the improvement of patient safety. Incident reports must be welcomed and appreciated as opportunities to improve…”3 National Commissioning Planning guidance for 2014/15 emphasises Patient Safety, including development of Regional and Area Team Quality surveillance groups, a new Patient Safety Alerting System, continued zero tolerance of MRSA bloodstream infections, and the setup of a Patient Safety Collaborative Programme.4 Provider planning guidance for 2014/15 onwards emphasises safe services including: reporting and learning culture, using the patient safety thermometer, robust incident processes, duty of candour, reducing avoidable deaths, early warning systems for deteriorating patients, safe staffing levels, and having a clean environment to drive down MRSA and C.Difficile rates5 The Partnership Trust Safety Strategy elaborates on the 2013/14 safety priorities: no avoidable grade 2/3/4 pressure ulcers developed in our care; development of the Safety Thermometer; and reducing harm from falls. 2 See http://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/cquin-guid-1415.pdf 3 See http://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/tech-guid-1415.pdf page 44 4 See http://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/5yr-strat-plann-guid-wa.pdf page 19 5 See http://www.ntda.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/tda_planning_2013_final-4.pdf page 9 Page 9 of 21 Quality Improvement Priorities for 2014/15 – consultation Recommendation for Priority 1 The Trust should make minor amendments to the current aim and measures for 2014/15. Proposed measures for 2014/15 Proposed 2014/15 target Number of pressure ulcers reported as grade Aim for Zero grade 2/3/4 avoidable 3 and 4 pressure ulcers and reported as pressure ulcers developed in our serious incidents care6 Number of pressure ulcers reported as avoidable grade 3 / 4 pressure ulcers developed in our care and reported in our care and reported as serious incidents. Zero grade 2/3/4 avoidable pressure ulcers developed in our care7 All pressure ulcers for people in our care and Increase in number of incidents reported and reduction in the reported as adverse incident proportion of serious incidents / all reported incidents Other measures we will use for Safety Total number of adverse incidents reported (all incidents) Quarterly increase in number of incidents reported Percentage of reported incidents classified as Quarterly reduction in proportion of serious incidents / all reported serious incidents incidents Consultation questions Is the measure for ‘pressure ulcers reported as adverse incidents’ already covered by the more general measure ‘total number of adverse incidents reported’? Do you agree with the minor changes made to the Quality Improvement Priority around Safety? Should we include other measures? Should we delete any measures that are no longer appropriate? 6 Specific trajectory to be determined 7 Specific trajectory to be determined Page 10 of 21 Quality Improvement Priorities for 2014/15 – consultation Priority 2: Experience – customer satisfaction Current aim Our aim: improve our overall customer satisfaction (Net promoter score / “Friends and family test”) Current measures Measures we will report to our Board 2013/14 target Friends and family test (Net Promoter Score) Maintenance of existing high scores8 Health and social care compliments received by the Partnership Trust Year on year increase in the number of compliments received Percentage of complaints acknowledged within three working days 100% (health) Percentage of complaints responded to within complaints NHS regulations timescales 100% 100% (social care) Other measures we will use to track progress Patient Experience Surveys within Health and Social Care At least 1000 responses each month from surveys in Health. Implementation of comment cards for community services where service users don’t wish to use technological solutions TBC Number of complaints that were not responded to within 60 days 0 Key points 8 Most service specifications have a patient experience requirement The Friends and Family Test / Net Promoter Score is a key part of the Service User Experience Strategy. The Clewyd-Hart report into how complaints are handled by NHS hospitals was published in October 2013. Recommendations included development of This target was changed from the previously published +84 by end of Q4 target. Page 11 of 21 Quality Improvement Priorities for 2014/15 – consultation appropriate professional behaviour in handling of complaints, taking action to improve quality resulting from complaints, encouraging both positive and negative feedback about services, board-led scrutiny of complaints, publication of an annual complaints report, and establishment of clear standards for complaints handling 9 The Friends and Family test is one of the four nationally mandated CQUIN schemes for 2014/15 National planning guidance for 2014/15 emphasises patient experience; “…Plans are expected to demonstrate measurable improvement in patient experience as well as continued investment in generating feedback…” 9 A key element of the Partnership Trust Experience Strategy is to capture user and carer feedback, reporting this regularly and acting to make improvements in service user experience.10 The NHS Outcomes Framework 2014/15 includes a new placeholder (the indicator is in development): Improving people’s experience of integrated care11 The Experience Team will be continuing to develop the use of real time reporting, linked to service improvements from feedback. The team will look at increasing the number of ele-lite devices for providing feedback, and rolling out integrated health and social care survey processes for our Integrated Local Care Teams. See http://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/5yr-strat-plann-guid-wa.pdf page 20 10 See http://www.staffordshireandstokeontrent.nhs.uk/Quality%20files/Experience%20Strategy.pdf page 11 11 See the Adult Social Care Outcomes Framework indicator 3E Page 12 of 21 Quality Improvement Priorities for 2014/15 – consultation Recommendation for Priority 2 The Trust should continue with the current aim and measures for 2014/15, making minor amendments as follows. Proposed measures for 2014/15 Proposed 2014/15 target Friends and family test (Net Promoter Score) Achieve and sustain +70 for all services Health and social care compliments received by the Partnership Trust Year on year increase in the number of compliments received Percentage of complaints acknowledged within three working days 100% (health) Percentage of complaints responded to within complaints NHS regulations timescales 100% Patient Experience Surveys within Health and Social Care At least 1000 responses each month from surveys in Health and at least 98 responses each month from surveys in social care for Integrated Health and Social Care Teams. Implementation of comment cards for community services where service users don’t wish to use technological solutions Comment cards available in all places where care is delivered Number of complaints that were not responded to within 60 days 0 Percentage of complaints that are reviewed by our complaints panel All high risk complaints 100% (social care)12 5% of all other complaints13 Consultation Do you agree with the changes made to the Quality Improvement Priority around Experience? Rather than just report an overall friends and family score, should we also report by division? Should we also set a target for each division? 12 Separated reporting for Health and Social care complaint due to differing systems and responsibilities for social care complaints. 13 Target to be confirmed with complaints panel Page 13 of 21 Quality Improvement Priorities for 2014/15 – consultation Should we include other measures? Should we delete any measures that are no longer appropriate? Page 14 of 21 Quality Improvement Priorities for 2014/15 – consultation Priority 3: Effectiveness – improving outcomes Current aim: Improve the outcomes of our services We want to provide effective services with positive outcomes for our service users. We know that quality improves when our staff focus on the outcome – “the end result” – for the service user. To focus on the outcome means to focus on individual needs and preferences, not simply tasks. During 2013/14 we focussed on outcomes for our Therapy, Allied Health Professional, and Children’s clinical teams, linked to a two-year CQUIN initiative. This year 41 Teams were scheduled to participate this work. Current measures Measures we will report to our Board 2013/14 target Number of teams demonstrating improvement in their outcome measures 41 teams will be participating in 2013/14 will have completed their level for 2013/14 as per the table below and move to the next level for 2014/15 Other measures we will use to track progress Average length of stay in community hospitals Monthly data not to exceed a median of 23 days throughout the whole year Number of teams at this level at start of 2013/14 2013/14 target Services or teams will evidence that outcome measurement tools are in use and systems for data capture are fully established. 1714 Services or teams will evidence that outcome measurement tools are in use and systems for data capture are fully established. Services or teams will evidence that systems have been developed to ensure that outcome data is being systematically collated in a manner that will allow analysis. 12 Services or teams will evidence that systems have been developed to ensure that outcome data is being systematically collated in a manner that will allow analysis. Outcome measures: Level To achieve this level each team must: 1 - Plan to develop evidence based outcome tools 2a - plan systems for capturing and analysing outcome data In total there are 41 teams included within the CQUIN for 2013/14. The Sneyd Occupational Therapy team is part of the Sneyd ward Stroke rehabilitation therapy service. 14 Page 15 of 21 Quality Improvement Priorities for 2014/15 – consultation Number of teams at this level at start of 2013/14 2013/14 target Services or teams must evidence that quality outcome data has been collected and analysed throughout the year. 9 Services or teams must evidence that quality outcome data has been collected and analysed throughout the year. Services or teams must demonstrate that outcomes have measurably and materially improved. 3 Services or teams must demonstrate that outcomes have measurably and materially improved. Outcome measures: Level To achieve this level each team must: 2b - Collect 12 months outcome data. 3 - plan for improving outcomes. Key points 15 Most service specifications from healthcare commissioners require regular reporting of service user experience data. National planning guidance for 2014/15 emphasises an outcome focus15. NHS England will be reviewing funding mechanisms so that they are truly supportive of improving outcomes, as part of the measures to close the potential funding gap of around £30 billion by 2020/21. Outcomes based commissioning is a fundamental part of NHS England’s, approach, and they are encouraging stretched local ambitions for outcomes, expansion of patientreported outcome measurement, and sharing of outcome data. The Partnership Trust Effectiveness Strategy is focussed providing the best possible outcomes for our service users, by developing routine outcome measures as well as the use of audit and service evaluation.16 Provider planning guidance for 2014/15 onwards emphasises effectiveness including; better outcomes for patients, full participation in national clinical audits, using NICE Quality Standards, supporting the prevention / reduction of admissions and readmissions to hospital, integration with social care, working on Every Contact Counts, 7 day working17 See http://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/5yr-strat-plann-guid-wa.pdf page 23 16 See http://www.staffordshireandstokeontrent.nhs.uk/Quality%20files/Effectiveness%20Strategy.pdf page 22 17 See http://www.ntda.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/tda_planning_2013_final-4.pdf page 10 Page 16 of 21 Quality Improvement Priorities for 2014/15 – consultation Recommendation for priority 3 Expand the measure “number of teams demonstrating improvement in their outcome measures” to encompass Integrated Local Community Teams and Specialist Services teams for 2015/16, Proposed measures for 2014/15 Proposed 2014/15 target Number of teams demonstrating improvement in their outcome measures All teams currently developing their outcome measures will have moved to their next level by the end of 2014/15 and will have as a minimum started collecting and analysing outcomes data (level 2a). Applicable teams: Allied Health Professional teams Therapy services teams Children’s clinical teams New teams will be participating in the outcome measures programme, and will have as a minimum a plan to develop evidence based outcome tools (level 1). Applicable teams: Average length of stay in community hospitals18 Integrated Local Community Teams Specialist Services teams Monthly data not to exceed a median of 23 days throughout the whole year Consultation Do you agree with the changes made to the Quality Improvement Priority around Effectiveness? Should we include other measures? Should we delete any measures that are no longer appropriate? 18 This measure is routinely looked at as part of the Trust performance management suite of indicators, but is not directly related to outcome measures. Page 17 of 21 Quality Improvement Priorities for 2014/15 – consultation Priority 4: Effectiveness - supporting independence by personalised care Current aim: ensure our service users have choice and control over the shape of health and social care support we provide We want our integrated adult health and social care teams to focus on giving service users choice and control over the shape of the support we give them. We call this “personalisation”. Current measures Measures we will report to our Board 2013/14 target Service users who agree with key statements in “Making it Real” (e.g. “I have the information and support I need in order to remain as independent as possible”) We are aiming to improve on the baseline. How the improvement will be measured is yet to be determined. Other measures we will use to track progress Percentage of people who receive Achieve 70% by the end of the year directed support and / or direct payments Percentage of people who feel that they were supported to make their own decisions about their social care and / or services Maintain 85% through the whole year Proportion of permanent admissions to residential or nursing care homes 150 per 100,000 Key points Continuing need to be person-centered rather than task-focussed NHS England describes a model of delivering care that is integrated around the individual as being essential, including integration across health and social care, including the £3.8 billion Better Care Fund from 2015/16 aimed at supporting the integration of health and social care. The Partnership Trust Effectiveness Strategy cites “Making it Real” as an approach that makes a public commitment to improving quality in social care.19 19 See http://www.staffordshireandstokeontrent.nhs.uk/Quality%20files/Effectiveness%20Strategy.pdf page 30 Page 18 of 21 Quality Improvement Priorities for 2014/15 – consultation Recommendation for priority 4 The Trust should retain the existing measures for priority 4 for 2014/15: Proposed measures for 2014/15 Proposed 2014/15 target Service users who agree with key statements in “Making it Real” (e.g. “I have the information and support I need in order to remain as independent as possible”) We are aiming to improve on the baseline. How the improvement will be measured is yet to be determined. Percentage of people who receive Achieve 70% by the end of the year directed support and / or direct payments Percentage of people who feel that they were supported to make their own decisions about their social care and / or services Maintain 85% through the whole year Proportion of permanent admissions to residential or nursing care homes20 150 per 100,000 Consultation questions Rather than have a separate priority, should we include this measure as part of priority 3 (Effectiveness)? As an Integrated health and social care organisation should we look to expanding the principles and method of “Making it real” across all services, rather than just those with a direct social care element? Should we have a specific measure around personalisation? Should we develop the effectiveness priority to include specific practice standards, in addition to personalisation? 20 This measure is routinely looked at as part of the Trust performance management suite of indicators, but is not directly related to personalisation. Page 19 of 21 Quality Improvement Priorities for 2014/15 – consultation NEW Priority 5: Safety - workforce The National Quality Board’s Safe Staffing ‘How to Guide’21 emphasises the need for policies, systems and routine monitoring of shift-to-shift staffing levels. This should be at Executive team level. To be open and transparent, staffing capacity and capability should be discussed at a public Board meeting at least every six months on the basis of a full nursing and midwifery establishment review. This is supported by a national requirement for transparent monthly reporting of ward-by-ward staffing levels. The RCN “safer staffing for older peoples wards” also provided relevant guidance for safe staffing levels. October 2013 Board received an acuity staffing establishment reviews, which looked at staffing levels and skill mix at community hospitals. The Trust Development Authority is requiring that Trust Boards clearly demonstrate work towards the introduction of 7 Day working and identify the impact this will have both on quality and cost within the services they provide.22 With the initial focus nationally, on improving 7 day working across Urgent and Emergency care pathways, The Partnership Trust’s senior team recognises that where there is currently an inconsistency of access to clinical services over a seven day period, patients do not always experience parity of access to the optimum treatment or diagnostic tests that they should. Therefore active participation as a key partner of the three Local Health Economy approaches to improving pathways is considered essential. Given the shift from hospital based care to care in the community, we require a more flexible workforce in the health and social care system that is responsive to changing demand and flow. It is imperative that staff have the appropriate skills and knowledge to deliver high quality, safe care in new clinical settings and closer to home. As such the Partnership Trust has committed to a patient centric, pathway model of workforce planning; capturing staff skills, knowledge and competence, fundamental to workforce re-profiling and ensuring an effective 7 day working model. 21 See http://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/nqb-how-to-guid.pdf 22 See http://www.ntda.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/tda_planning_2013_final-4.pdf Page 20 of 21 Quality Improvement Priorities for 2014/15 – consultation Recommendation: consider a new “priority 5” The Trust should consider an additional priority, based on national direction and commissioning intentions: Aim: Ensure that our workforce can provide safe levels of care Proposed measures for 2014/15 Proposed 2014/15 target Number of routine services that deliver against clinical standards in line with 7day working according to national guidance We will determine all relevant services that the national guidance on 7-day working applies to, and ensure that these services comply with the guidance for 7-day working. Publish monthly staffing levels for our community wards, including agreed establishment, safe staffing level in relation to acuity, and actual staffing levels. Staffing is always at a safe level in relation to shift-by shift service need, taking into account the demand on the service.23 Publish two acuity staffing establishment Reviews will make use of national reviews, which look at safe staffing levels guidance, professional body guidance and best practice on in community hospitals, during 2014/15 staffing levels, and will aim to demonstrate appropriate staffing establishment and skill mix, for the provision of safe care. Consultation Questions Should an additional priority for Safety become a Trust Quality Improvement Priority? If so, what targets and measures would be realistic? Do you agree with the addition of a measure for safe staffing and its associated target? What should this measure focus on? Do you agree with the addition of a measure for 7 day working? 23 Details on how this will be reported are to be developed by April 2014 Page 21 of 21