Self-Organizing Bio-structures NB2-2009 L. Duroux Overall goal Give an insight of self-organizing processes in nature and how these designs inspired humans to create nano-sized objects Lectures focuses on self-organization/selfassembly of bio-structures: molecules to supramolecular assemblies SO & physics Snowflake Benard Convection Cells Diffusion-limited Aggregation Sand Dune SO & chemistry micelle keratin & collagen DNA Simplex virus SO & Biology Slime mold Daisy Nautilus Zebra SO & Nanotechnology Liquid crystals DNA tiles Dendrimers Bacteriorhodopsin Supramolecular Chemistry Jean-Marie LEHN (Nobel Chemistry, 1987) Chemistry beyond molecules Supermolecules Organization, intermolecular non-covalent bonds, different (better) properties than parts Lecture Plan 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Pre-biotic chemistry (Ch. 2 & 3) The formation of macromolecular sequences (Ch. 4) Self-Organization in Biological systems (Ch. 5) Supra-molecular Chemistry Self-Assembly of Nucleic Acids DNA in Nanotechnologies Self-Assembly of Polypeptides Proteins in Nanotechnologies Viruses Membranes Supporting Material Text Book: “The Emergence of life” by Pier L. Luigi (ISBN: 0-521-82117-7) Text Book: “Supramolecular Chemistry – Fundamentals and Applications, Advanced Textbook” by Ariga and Kunitake (ISBN: 10 3-54001298-2) Selected review articles on specialized topics Other Readings (specific topics) Self-Assembled Nanostructures, by J. Zhang et al, 2002, 340 p., Hardcover ISBN: 978-0-306-47299-2 Self-Assembling Peptide Systems in Biology, Medicine and Engineering, by A. Aggeli et al, 2001, 372 p., Hardcover ISBN: 978-0-7923-7090-1 Self-Assembly in Supramolecular Systems, by L F Lindoy & I M Atkinson, 2000, 234p., Hardcover ISBN 0 85404 512 0 Lecture 1 From Pre-Biotic Chemistry to Macromolecular Assemblies A scale of Molecular Complexity towards Life CELLS METABOLIC NETWORKS POLYMER COMPLEXES MACROMOLECULES BIOMONOMERS MOLECULES ATOMS The origin of Life: a time scale How did life emerge? How can it be tested? Formation of organic molecules “building blocks” Organic synthesis in reducing atmosphere The Urey-Miller Experiment (1953) Synthesis of Adenine from cyanide 1.16Å 890kJ/mol •Nitriles: highly polar group (dipole: 3.9 Debye) •Reaction: substitution (Ca), addition on triple bond •Condensation catalyzed by heat (in aqueous medium) Synthesis of Pyrimidine bases CH4 + N2 spark Synthesis of Aldoses C=O 1.24Å 735kJ/mol Aldehydes/ketones: permanent or induced dipole (O2 electronegativity) Tautomery and H mobility on Ca Nucleophilic additions on Ca Peptide bonds formation Catalytic activity Synthesis in nonreducing Atmosphere The “Pyrite” hypothesis In hydrothermal sources Reduction of atm. CO2 and N2 Autotrophic Final product: pyruvate Self-organized, coupled chemical reactions: metabolism from the start! Deep-sea vents biota Reducing conditions in deep-sea vents: Fe chemistry, temperature >350degC: FeS + H2S FeS2 + 2H+ + 2e- Extreme thermophiles ribosomal RNA: most primitive organisms known to date! Prebiotic organics in early Earth Exo-Biological sources Space dust: 40000 tons/year OR 8 ng/cm2 Murchinson meteorite: 4.6 bY, amino acids, purines, pyrimidines, carbox. Ac., polyols… Carbon as a result from H2 and He “burning” (fusion) in stars What was found or not in meteorites or comets dust Found: diverse simple organic molecules, membrane-forming aliphatic molecules Not found: polypeptides, mononucleotides The question of “chemical selection” Why do Miller’s amino acids form (a-enantiomers)? a-amino-acids are more thermodynamically stable than bamino-acids BUT: many molecules under kinetic controls catalysts, i.e. enzymes! Enzymes first? How possible? How can selection (in Darwinian terms) be applied to prebiotic chemistry? The example of D-ribose in RNA/DNA Why D-ribose instead of D-ribulose ? Reasons for pre-biotic selection Contingency A chemical pathway is determined by the cooccurrence of precursors in time and space Determinism Nature has “chosen” a path that leads to further developments/evolution (according to the laws n Physics and Chemistry) The Deterministic hypothesis Would a “wrong” thermodynamically stable chemical lead to a dead-end in evolution OR to an equally good alternative? Hypothesis tested by Eschenmoser et al. (1986): D-furanose vs D-pyranose as the “sugar” for DNA (homo-RNA) Eschenmoser’s homo- and allo-DNA Eschenmoser, 1999. Science, 284:2118-2124 Stability of homo-DNA duplexes Greater stability due to higher rigidity of pyranose ring: pre-oganisation into helical structure Other alternatives to D-ribose Other “potentially natural” oses could give alternative DNA with similar Tm Nature only selected D-ribose… a matter of contingency or determinism? On the origin of Molecular Asymmetry Why only one type of chirality in families of molecules (L-form of amino-acids, D-form for sugars)? Why only one type of chirality and stereoregularity in natural polymer chains? Any thermodynamic reason? Only subtle differences in free energy between two forms (10-10 J). In chemistry, often racemic mixtures are obtained! Molecular asymmetry See animation Crystals as ”symmetry breakers” Achiral or racemic mixtures generally give crystals with faces of opposite handedness: equal probability to interface medium The face of the crystal at interface with medium will induce racemisation of the solution (glycine crystals) Complementarity in homochirality Would life be possible with D-amino acids? Maybe, but only with L-sugars… Example: topoisomerase with D-amino-acids incapable to recognise right-handed DNA! If enzymes catalyzed sugars synthesis… In Summary Thermodynamic control: gives an initial set of favorable products, essentially monomers Kinetic control: responsible for the diversification (hence life), in particular polymers Sequence of 129aa of lysozyme not because most stable combination! Symmetry can be broken, but how does asymmetry propagate?