UNIVERSITI
TEKNOLOGI
MALAYSIA
SINGAPORE PARLIAMENT PROCEEDING 25 JANUARY 2003
~
PROF. S JAYAKUMAR
FOREIGN AFFAIRS MINISTER
“In the same vein there were almost daily articles in the Malaysian Malay
language Press playing up Singapore alleged aggressive intentions.
On 18 January 2003, Berita Harian Malaysia recklessly alleged that Singapore has
stealthily embarked on a bioterrorism program………”
“Such war-mongering articles, it should noted, are found especially in the Malay
Language press, which can only be designed to stir up animosities in their Malay
population against Singapore.”
1
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
Malaysia’s Premier University in Engineering and Technology
1
1/25
2/25
I TEND TO BE A LITTLE BIT CRITICLE
3/25
THE ART OF ACADEMIC FREEDOM:
BUILDING BRIDGES BETWEEN SCHOLARS AND THE
RULE OF LAW
Azmi Hassan
Director
Center For Technology Policy and International Studies
(CENTEPIS)
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia International Campus
4/25
RESTRICTIONS
Scholars in Malaysia are aware of the variety of rules and
regulations that effectively take away their academic
freedoms thus making it difficult to carry out their teaching
and research responsibilities
The Oath of Allegiance for example is considered oppressive
because it is related to the Statutory Bodies (Discipline and
Surcharge) Act 2000. This act in effect makes it an offence for
any scholars to comment on governmental policies (whether
favorably or critically) without ministerial permission.
5/25
ACADEMIC FREEDOM CONSTRAINTS
With all the restrictions and regulations imposed by
•
•
•
•
•
Rule 17 Statutory Bodies (Discipline and Surcharge) Act 2000
Universities and University Colleges Act (UUCA)
Official Secrets Act (OSA)
Staff General Order (GO) and
Printing Presses and Publications Act (PPPA)
All of which curtail the scope and freedom of research and
teaching in one way or another.
6/25
OATH OF ALLEGIANCE
I, ................... bearing I/C no ................... residing in ................... solemnly
declare that I will abide Statutory Bodies (Discipline and Surcharge) 2000
[Act 605] and all instructions issued and enforced by University Teknologi
Malaysia, from time to time throughout my services with University
Teknologi Malaysia. Thus, I solemnly declare, as required under Rule 3,
Disciplinary Rules of the Statutory Bodies, that is within the Second
Schedule of the Statutory Bodies Act (Discipline and Surcharge) 2000 [Act
605], that I, among others:
:
:
I wholly understand that if I were charged with breaching this Aku Janji,
disciplinary action under the Statutory Bodies (Discipline and Surcharge)
2000 [Act 605] can be taken against me.
7/25
RULE 17 STATUTORY BODIES (DISCIPLINE AND
SURCHARGE) 2000 [ACT 605]
Impossible to enforce. It is highly impractical for the authorities to
process the requests from all scholars every time they wish to make
a statement or write an article that touches upon governmental
policies.
Therefore, one can only presume that this law is meant to be used
as and when the authorities wish to.
That is to say it becomes a prevalent and ever present threat to all
academics.
8/25
OFFICIAL SECRETS ACT SECTION (8)
Rule 17 should also be read together with Official Secrets
Act Section (8) under the heading of Wrongful
Communications, etc., of Official Secret.
It explicitly states that any person who is in his position has
access to any official secret and communicates it to the
public; the person is guilty of an offence.
9/25
DEFINITION OF OFFICIAL SECRETS
Schedule to the Act lists three categories of documents that are always
considered ‘official secret’, these are:
• Cabinet records, records of decisions and deliberations including
those of Cabinet committees;
• State Executive Council documents, records of decisions and
deliberations including those of State Executive Council committees;
• Documents concerning national security, defense and international
relations.
This list may be added to at any time by Ministerial Order.
10/25
Section 16A also states that any certificate of secrecy issued by any
public official is conclusive evidence that a document is in fact an official
secret.
The definition of official secrets in OSA is tantamount to said that the
amount of information subject to classification as a official secret is
potentially unlimited.
The list of documents and information provided in the Schedule is
extremely broad and no doubt open to abuse.
11/25
RESTRICTIONS IS DETRIMENTAL TO SCHOLARS
Imposing all the restrictions to universities lecturers who are
considered scholars in their field of expertise, not only detrimental
to the way these scholars conduct their teaching, but also to the
country as a whole.
Without academic freedom, the quality of teaching and research
will suffer. The general public depends on the academe to provide
unbiased views on social analysis so as to strengthened civil
society. This can only be achieved if only freedoms of expression
are enjoyed by the scholars.
12/25
ACADEMIC FREEDOM IN MALAYSIA IHL?
From the general public perspective, there exist some forms of
academic freedom in higher education.
Even among the scholars, academic freedom is taken for granted. It is
not far from truth if one said that academic freedom is under attack
via various restrictions imposed.
Scholars are considered as the main engine of the knowledge-based
society and the existence of academic freedom constraints this surely
will hamper the value of the knowledge-based society.
13/25
TWO CLASSIC EXAMPLES: 1. SMOG CRISIS
In 2005, during the height of smog crisis due to the open burning
practice from the Indonesian side, an air pollution expert warned about
the danger of inhaling air pollutants.
The scholar statement even though looks very innocent in nature; it
incurred the wrath of government officials. Implicitly the OSA and
Rule 17 were applied and subsequently a general gag order was issued
forbidding scholars from speaking to the press.
In this case the Air Pollution Index (API) was classified as official
secret.
14/25
TWO CLASSIC EXAMPLES: 2. JAPANESE ENCEPHALITIS
A virologist from Universiti Malaysia Sarawak irked health officials
when she said that the outbreak was not caused by Japanese
Encephalitis virus, which in fact contradicts the official health
ministry statement.
It was later proved that it was in fact the outbreak was caused a new
strain of Hendra-like virus.
15/25
RECENT EXAMPLE: BUKIT ANTARABANGSA LANDSLIDE
SCHOLARS AND THEIR VIEWS
16/25
POLITICALLY CORRECT STATEMENT
A poser about ‘politically correct’ is put into perspective with regards
to the writer own experienced.
Numerous politically ‘motivated’ statements to the media which if
read in conjunction with Rule 17 and also the definition of official
secrets as defined in OSA, the writer can be reprimanded by the
authority. The writer also wrote numerous opinion piece in the local
media taking about sensitive issues.
But being politically correct, the rules and regulations are set aside.
17/25
POLITICALLY MOTIVATED STATEMENT
18/25
AGENDA MOTIVATED
STATEMENT
19/25
AGENDA MOTIVATED STATEMENT
20/25
Rule 17 and other restrictions may not have been applied arbitrary
on scholars where lecturers are sacked in impunity. But these rules
and regulations are considered as insidious velvet-glove and subtler
approach to limit academic freedom.
Many scholars still shy away from speaking out or approaching
university or government officials to voice their concerned of their
area of expertise.
These regulations in fact placed some restrictions on the scholars, in
particular the expression of unapproved political and dissenting
views.
21/25
SPY SATELLITE PROGRAM
22/25
AL-MAUNAH ~ ABU SAYAFF’S PULAU SIPADAN & PANDANAN
23/25
1
3
2
24/25
25/25