Chapter 12 The Media WHO GOVERNS? 1. How much power do the media have? 2. Can we trust the media to be fair? TO WHAT ENDS? 1. What public policies will the media support? Copyright © 2011 Cengage The Media and Politics Freedom of the Press=very difficult to prove libel The United States versus Europe=much stricter/people who leak information get punished Freedom of Information Act=easy for press to extract gov. information Newspapers=no gov. permission to operate Radio and Television=FCC must renew their license Federal Communication Commission (FCC)=gov. agency/gives out liscences Copyright © 2011 Cengage Journalism in American Political History The Party Press=gov. Paid for them/expensive During early America The Popular Press= Telegraph/AP provided Stories/printing papers Cheaper/grew/easy to access Magazines of Opinion=“yellow Journalism/wrote about politics Reform/writers gained a national following Bettmann/Corbis Electronic Journalism=Radio1920s-40s Before television and the Television/political talk shows Internet, news came by The Internet=Half of Americans get radio, as here in 1939. p. Political news /raise money/organize people/ 292 Copyright © 2011 Cengage Powerlineblog.com. Reprinted with permission. Blogs, both conservative and liberal, have become an important form of political advertising. p. 289 As appeared on www.dailykos.com. Reprinted with permission. Copyright © 2011 Cengage The Structure of the Media Degree of Competition=lack of newspaper competition/young people don’t read political news as much/often more local news than national The National Media=US Associated Press/United Press International • Gatekeeper=influence what subjects become national political news and for how long • Scorekeeper=keeps track of and makes political reputations • Watchdog=keep tabs on politicians/wrongdoing Copyright © 2011 Cengage Rules Governing the Media Newspapers – least governmental regulation Radio and TV – most governmental regulation (FCC) Campaigning Bebeto Matthews/AP Photo Copyright © 2011 Cengage Activists urge Congress to pass a law shielding reporters from being required to testify about their sources. p. 296 Confidentiality of Sources Some states allow it/passed laws Most states/Federal gov. do not allow it if in best interest of gov. Could go to jail if you’re a reporter Agree/Disagree? Copyright © 2011 Cengage Regulating broadcasting Radio/TV needs a FCC license Renewable every 7 years radio/5 for TV Need to submit your programming/how you benefit your community Deregulation today=lowered most with radio/more opinions on talk radio Equal time rule=must sell equal time to both candidates Copyright © 2011 Cengage Campaigning Equal time rule=must be charged same rates as other candidates Market=buy ads campaign in specific areas/local ads vs national ads Problem=horserace journalism=media focuses on who is ahead in polls vs position of the candidates Copyright © 2011 Cengage Copyright © 2011 Cengage Are the National Media Biased? Do members of the media have a distinctive political attitude? Does that attitude affect what they write or say? Does what they write or say affect what citizens believe? Copyright © 2011 Cengage Brown Brothers When President Theodore Roosevelt cultivated the media, reporters usually were unknown and poorly paid. p. 304 Copyright © 2011 Cengage Are the National Media Biased? A liberal majority Neutral and objective? • Routine stories=media stories regularly covered • Feature stories=reporters seek these out and publish them Spanish-speaking voters have become • Insider stories=cover thingssooften athat candidates, such as important Hillary Clinton, run Spanish web sites. p secret 299 Media’s influence • Selective attention=people remember/believe only what they want to Copyright © 2011 engage Hillaryclinton.com Figure 12.2 Public Perception of Accuracy in the Media Source: Pew Research Center, “The People and the Press” (August 2007). Copyright © 2011 Cengage Government and the News Prominence of the president=press secretary/goal to control the image of Pres. Coverage of Congress=senators use the press to get recognized Why do we have so many news leaks?=only if favorable/branches compete for power Copyright © 2011 Cengage ©1991 Dana Fradon/The New Yorker Collection from cartoonbank.com. All Rights Reserved. Copyright © 2011 Cengage p. 306 Sensationalism in the Media 1980s sex and politics were govered (Gary Hart, Bill Clinton) Since Watergate/Vietnam press has been adversaries of Government/competition in media Copyright © 2011 Cengage Government constraints on Journalists 15,000-20,000 congressional staffers (Congressmen gets mad move on to another) 4 ways Gov/press communicate 1. on the record (quote official by name) 2. off the record (what official says can’t be used) 3. on background (what official says can be used but can’t attribute to him by name 4. on deep background (what the official says can be used but not attributed to anyone) Copyright © 2011 Cengage p. 303 Copyright © 2011 Cengage In 1933, White House press conferences were informal affairs, as when reporters gathered around Franklin Roosevelt’s desk in the Oval Office. Bettmann/Corbis Today, there are huge gatherings held in a special conference room, as on the right. p. 305 Copyright © 2011 Cengage JASON REED/Reuters/Landov Activity Pg. 176 #1, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14 Copyright © 2011 Cengage Page 176 1. A 4. E 6. B 7. A 8. A 9. B 11. C 13. C 14. E Copyright © 2011 Cengage WHAT WOULD YOU DO? MEMORANDUM To: Matthew Wilson, senator From: Margaret Drinker, legislative assistant Subject: Protecting Journalists The Supreme Court has held that forcing a reporter to testify does not violate the First Amendment to the Constitution. But Congress could pass a law, similar to that in many states, banning such testimony if it reveals a confidential source. Copyright © 2011 Cengage WHAT WOULD YOU DO? Arguments for: 1. Thirty-four states now have shield laws similar to the one proposed by Congress. 2. Effective journalism requires protecting sources from being identified; without protection, a lot of important stories would not be written. Copyright © 2011 Cengage WHAT WOULD YOU DO? Arguments against: 1. Every person accused in a criminal trial has a right to know all of the evidence against him or her and to confront witnesses. A shield law would deprive people of this right. 2. A shield law would allow any government official to leak secret information with no fear of being detected. Copyright © 2011 Cengage WHAT WOULD YOU DO? Your decision: Support Bill? Oppose Bill? Copyright © 2011 Cengage