Reasons why Economists Disagree (from Gregory Mankiw) • Differences in Scientific Judgments • Example: Is it better to tax income or consumption? • Differences in Values • Example: Should we focus on growth or equity? • Charlatans and Cranks (Mankiw’s words) • Example: Supply-Side Economics (Mankiw’s words again) McGraw-Hill/Irwin Colander, Economics 1 Economists in Agreement From Gregory Mankiw http://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/2009/02/news-flash-economistsagree.html McGraw-Hill/Irwin • Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the market value of all final goods and services produced within a country during a given time period. There are two ways to measure GDP: • Nominal GDP is the dollar value of production at current-year prices. For example, nominal GDP in 1990, $5,800.5 billion, is calculated using year 1990 prices for goods and services. Real GDP is the dollar value of production using a given base year prices. • For example, real GDP in 1990, $8,033.9 billion in year 2005 dollars, that is, the output of 1990 times the prices from 2005. The GDP Deflator measures changes in the overall level of prices for the goods and services that make up GDP. It is simply the ratio of nominal to real GDP times 100. Thus the value for 2005 is 100. • GDP per capita is calculated by dividing either nominal or real GDP for a given year by the population in that year. These numbers can be thought of as the average share of output per person. The nominal GDP per capita in 1870 was $194, while in 2008 was $47,422; the real GDP per capita for those same years was $2,814 and $43,714. Information from EH.Net McGraw-Hill/Irwin Colander, Economics 3 • GDP = Gross Domestic Product • GDP = the market value of final goods and services produced in an economy • Real GDP – the market value of final goods and services produced in an economy, stated in the prices of a given year. • Per capita real output is real GDP divided by the total population. • Per capita output = Per capita income = average income in the population GDP Defined McGraw-Hill/Irwin Colander, Economics 4 From Galor and Weil (AER, May 1999) McGraw-Hill/Irwin Colander, Economics 5 5 • EH.net (or Economic History Net) • http://eh.net/ • How much is that? • http://eh.net/hmit/ U.S. Economic Growth Data McGraw-Hill/Irwin Colander, Economics 6 • What Was the U.S. GDP Then? • http://www.measuringworth.org/usgdp/ US GDP History McGraw-Hill/Irwin Colander, Economics 7 Decade Beginning 1791 1801 1811 1821 1831 1841 1851 1861 1871 1881 1891 1901 Real GDP (in millions of 2011 dollars) $4,847 $8,781 $12,593 $17,226 $27,212 $36,429 $60,673 $94,773 $133,407 $244,512 $366,133 $504,794 Population (in thousands) 4,048 5,461 7,436 9,899 13,277 17,612 24,095 32,215 41,010 51,466 64,432 77,584 Real GDP per capita (in 2011 dollars) $1,197.44 $1,607.92 $1,693.56 $1,740.15 $2,049.56 $2,068.43 $2,518.07 $2,941.89 $3,253.04 $4,750.93 $5,682.48 $6,506.41 Decade Percentage Change NA 34.3% 5.3% 2.8% 17.8% 0.9% 21.7% 16.8% 10.6% 46.0% 19.6% 14.5% Average Annual Percentage (last decade) NA 3.0% 0.5% 0.3% 1.7% 0.1% 2.0% 1.6% 1.1% 3.9% 1.9% 1.5% Economic Growth in the th 19 century (from EH.net) McGraw-Hill/Irwin Colander, Economics 8 Decade Beginning 1911 1921 1931 1941 1951 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 2011 Real GDP (in millions of 2011 dollars) $624,789 $761,841 $946,562 $1,547,433 $2,449,443 $3,282,702 $5,002,409 $6,785,210 $9,084,331 $12,860,870 $15,094,000 Population (in thousands) 93,863 108,538 124,149 133,402 154,287 183,742 207,692 230,008 253,530 285,335 312,041 Real GDP per capita (in 2011 dollars) $6,656.39 $7,019.12 $7,624.40 $11,599.77 $15,875.89 $17,865.82 $24,085.71 $29,499.89 $35,831.39 $45,072.88 $48,371.85 Decade Percentage Change 2.3% 5.4% 8.6% 52.1% 36.9% 12.5% 34.8% 22.5% 21.5% 25.8% 7.3% Average Annual Percentage (last decade) 0.4% 0.7% 1.0% 4.6% 3.5% 1.2% 3.0% 2.1% 2.0% 2.3% 0.7% Economic Growth in the 20th century (from EH.net) McGraw-Hill/Irwin Colander, Economics 9 Real GDP per-capita has increased in every decade in U.S. history. Growth was faster in the 20th century (relative to the 19th century). Average annual growth in the 20th century was about 2% per year. For the past 100 years…. ◦ Real Gross Domestic Product has increased (on average) 38.4% in each decade ◦ Real GDP per capita has increased (on average) 22.5% in each decade Growth Happens!! McGraw-Hill/Irwin Colander, Economics 10 Decade Beginning Real GDP (in millions of 2011 dollars) Real GDP per capita (in 2011 dollars) 2021 $18,610,994 $59,642.78 2031 2041 $22,947,469 $28,294,369 $73,539.92 $90,675.16 2051 $34,887,129 $111,803.03 2061 $43,016,043 $137,853.82 2071 $53,039,043 $169,974.60 2081 $65,397,463 $209,579.71 2091 $80,635,470 $258,413.06 2101 $99,424,026 $318,624.88 2111 $122,590,429 $392,866.42 2121 $151,154,746 $484,406.68 2131 $186,374,723 $597,276.39 Here is the 21st Century (assuming growth continues – at 2.1% -- as it has for the past 100 years) AND YES, that is $122 trillion in 2111 with average income nearing $400,000!! McGraw-Hill/Irwin Colander, Economics 11 spending as a percentage of GDP Year Consumption Investment Government Spending Net Exports 1929 74.7% 15.9% 9.1% 0.4% 1930 76.9% 11.8% 11.0% 0.3% 1931 79.3% 7.7% 12.9% 0.0% 1932 83.0% 2.2% 14.8% 0.0% 1933 81.4% 3.0% 15.4% 0.2% 1934 78.0% 5.6% 15.9% 0.5% 1935 76.3% 9.1% 14.9% -0.3% 1936 74.2% 10.3% 15.6% -0.1% 1937 72.7% 13.3% 13.9% 0.1% 1938 74.7% 8.2% 16.0% 1.2% 1939 72.9% 10.1% 16.1% 0.9% 1940 70.3% 13.4% 14.8% 1.5% 1941 64.0% 14.3% 20.9% 0.8% Government Spending in the 20th century According to the BEA…government spending never exceeded 16.1% of GDP from 1933 to 1939. In 1951, government spending was 20.1% of GDP. It remained above 20% from 1951 until 1978 (under Jimmy Carter); reaching a peak of 23.9% in 1953 (under Dwight Eisenhower). Government spending also was above 20% from 1980 to 1992 (under Ronald Reagan and George Bush). From 1993 to 2007, government spending was less than 20%; reaching a minimum of 17.36% in 1998 (under Bill Clinton). From 2007 to 2011, government spending has been above 20%; reaching a peak of 21.2% in 2009. The average from 1951 to 2011 is 20.5%. So the peak in 2009 is close to the average across the last 60 years. In the first three quarters of 2012, government spending is once again below 20% of GDP. Since 1951, real GDP per capita has grown from $15,875 to $48,371 (according to EH.Net). In sum, government spending under the New Deal was not quite as large as the spending we have seen since 1951. The spending the BEA reports since 1951 has – in percentage terms – not been growing. And the economy, since 1951, has grown tremendously. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Colander, Economics 13 BLS DEFINITIONS HTTP://WWW.BLS.GOV/BLS/GLOSSARY.HTM Employed persons (Current Population Survey): Persons 16 years and over in the civilian noninstitutional population who, during the reference week, (a) did any work at all (at least 1 hour) as paid employees; worked in their own business, profession, or on their own farm, or worked 15 hours or more as unpaid workers in an enterprise operated by a member of the family; and (b) all those who were not working but who had jobs or businesses from which they were temporarily absent because of vacation, illness, bad weather, childcare problems, maternity or paternity leave, labor-management dispute, job training, or other family or personal reasons, whether or not they were paid for the time off or were seeking other jobs. Each employed person is counted only once, even if he or she holds more than one job. Excluded are persons whose only activity consisted of work around their own house (painting, repairing, or own home housework) or volunteer work for religious, charitable, and other organizations. McGraw-Hill/Irwin McGraw-Hill/Irwin Colander, Economics COLANDER, ECONOMICS 14 14 BLS DEFINITIONS HTTP://WWW.BLS.GOV/BLS/GLOSSARY.HTM Civilian noninstitutional population: Included are persons 16 years of age and older residing in the 50 States and the District of Columbia who are not inmates of institutions (for example, penal and mental facilities, homes for the aged), and who are not on active duty in the Armed Forces. Labor force participation rate: The labor force as a percent of the civilian noninstitutional population. Employment-population ratio (Current Population Survey): The proportion of the civilian noninstitutional population aged 16 years and over that is employed. McGraw-Hill/Irwin McGraw-Hill/Irwin Colander, Economics 15 15 BLS DEFINITIONS HTTP://WWW.BLS.GOV/BLS/GLOSSARY.HTM Unemployed persons (Current Population Survey): Persons aged 16 years and older who had no employment during the reference week, were available for work, except for temporary illness, and had made specific efforts to find employment sometime during the 4-week period ending with the reference week. Persons who were waiting to be recalled to a job from which they had been laid off need not have been looking for work to be classified as unemployed. Unemployment rate The unemployment rate represents the number unemployed as a percent of the labor force. McGraw-Hill/Irwin McGraw-Hill/Irwin Colander, Economics COLANDER, ECONOMICS 16 16 Great Depression Unemployment Estimates from Weir McGraw-Hill/Irwin Year UE Rate All workers UE Rate Non-farm workers 1929 2.9% 4.1% 1930 8.9% 12.4% 1931 15.7% 21.7% 1932 22.9% 31.7% 1933 20.9% 30.0% 1934 16.2% 23.6% 1935 14.4% 21.1% 1936 10.0% 14.9% 1937 9.2% 13.3% 1938 12.5% 18.3% 1939 11.3% 16.3% 1940 9.5% 13.5% 1941 6.0% 8.4% 1942 Colander,3.1% Economics 4.3% 17 Unemployment Rate: 1-48 to 1-13 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000 McGraw-Hill/Irwin McGraw-Hill/Irwin Colander, Economics 18 18 Labor Force Participation Rate: 1-48 to 1-13 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000 McGraw-Hill/Irwin COLANDER, ECONOMICS McGraw-Hill/Irwin Colander, Economics 19 19 Employment Population Ratio: 1-48 to 1-13 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12300000 McGraw-Hill/Irwin COLANDER, ECONOMICS McGraw-Hill/Irwin Colander, Economics 20 20 The Current Data Department of Labor Employment Report Monthly Data McGraw-Hill/Irwin McGraw-Hill/Irwin 21 Reconcile the following empirical observations: - Most unemployment spells are of short-duration. - Most people unemployed at any given time have been unemployed for a long-duration Example: In one year, 2 people are unemployed Each month, 2 people lose a job and find one at the end of the month At any given time, how many people have been unemployed for a long time? Over the year, how many people were unemployed for a short period of time? 6-22 Natural Rate of Unemployment The unemployment rate will not be reduced to zero. The rate that it will be when the economy is at “full employment” is called the Natureal Rate of Unemployment or the Target Rate of Unemployment McGraw-Hill/Irwin Colander, Economics 23 Jobs and Unemployment Natural rate of unemployment • Natural rate of unemployment: The average rate of unemployment around which the economy fluctuates. • In a recession, the actual unemployment rate rises above the natural rate. • In a boom, the actual unemployment rate falls below the natural rate. CHAPTER 6 Unemployment 17 Actual and natural rates of unemployment in the U.S., 1960-2006 Percent of labor force 12 10 Unemployment rate 8 6 4 Natural rate of unemployment 2 0 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 CHAPTER 6 Unemployment Jobs and Unemployment A first model of the natural rate Notation: L = # of workers in labor force E = # of employed workers U = # of unemployed U/L = unemployment rate CHAPTER 6 Unemployment 17 Jobs and Unemployment Assumptions: 1. L is exogenously fixed. 2. During any given month, s = fraction of employed workers that become separated from their jobs s is called the rate of job separations f = fraction of unemployed workers that find jobs f is called the rate of job finding s and f are exogenous CHAPTER 6 Unemployment 17 The transitions between employment and unemployment s E Employed Unemployed f U CHAPTER 6 Unemployment Jobs and Unemployment The steady state condition • Definition: the labor market is in steady state, or long-run equilibrium, if the unemployment rate is constant. • The steady-state condition is: s E = f U # of employed people who lose or leave their jobs # of unemployed people who find jobs CHAPTER 6 Unemployment 17 Jobs and Unemployment Finding the “equilibrium” U rate f U = sE = s(L –U ) = sL – sU Solve for U/L: (f + s)U = sL so, U s L sf CHAPTER 6 Unemployment 17 Jobs and Unemployment Example: • Each month, – 1% of employed workers lose their jobs (s = 0.01) – 19% of unemployed workers find jobs (f = 0.19) • Find the natural rate of unemployment: U s 0.01 0.05, or 5% L s f 0.01 0.19 CHAPTER 6 Unemployment 17 The CPI (from Mankiw) Jobs and Unemployment A measure of the overall level of prices Published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Uses: tracks changes in the typical household’s cost of living adjusts many contracts for inflation (“COLAs”) allows comparisons of dollar amounts over time 6-32 17 Jobs and Unemployment A bit of inflation history Period % Change in Money Supply ---------------------------1834-37 + 61 1837-43 - 58 1843-48 + 102 1848-49 - 11 1849-54 + 109 1854-55 - 12 1855-57 + 18 1857-58 - 23 1858-61 + 35 % Change in Price Level --------------------+ 28 - 35 + 9 0 + 32 + 2 + 1 - 16 - 4 (Sources: John Knox, A History of Banking in the United States, New York: Bradford Historical Statistics, 1960, series E1-12.) Rhodes, 1903; and Review data at eh.net Compare before and after WWII 6-33 17 Jobs and Unemployment Problems with CPI (from Mankiw) Substitution bias: The CPI uses fixed weights, so it cannot reflect consumers’ ability to substitute toward goods whose relative prices have fallen. Introduction of new goods: The introduction of new goods makes consumers better off and, in effect, increases the real value of the dollar. But it does not reduce the CPI, because the CPI uses fixed weights. Unmeasured changes in quality: Quality improvements increase the value of the dollar, but are often not fully measured. 6-34 17 Real and Nominal Concepts Nominal output is the total amount of goods and services measured at current prices. Real output is the total amount of goods and services produced, adjusted for price level changes. nominal output real output 100 price index 6-35 Jobs and Unemployment Costs of Inflation Inflation may not make a nation poorer. It can redistribute income from those who do not raise their prices to those who do. It can reduce the amount of information that prices convey. Inflation is a very serious problem IF it increases to hyperinflation – exceptionally high levels of inflation, 100 percent or more a year. 6-36 17 Inflation and Money Growth 13-37 Jobs and Unemployment Quantity Theory and the Inflation/Growth Trade-Off 17 Quantity theorists believe that low inflation should be the priority of policy. They believe that low inflation leads to growth because: It reduces price uncertainty, making it easier for businesses to invest in future production. It encourages businesses to enter into long-term contracts. It makes using money much easier. 13-38 Jobs and Unemployment Why Central Banks Increase the Money Supply 17 If the central bank must buy government bonds to finance a government deficit, the money supply increases and inflation may occur. This inflation works as a kind of tax on individuals, and is often called an inflation tax because it reduces the value of cash. Central banks have to make a policy choice: Ignite inflation by bailing out their governments with an expansionary monetary policy. Do nothing and risk recession or economic breakdown. 13-39 Jobs and Unemployment Demand-Pull and Cost-Push Inflation Demand-pull inflation occurs when the economy is at or above potential output. It is generally characterized by shortages of goods and workers. Cost-push inflation occurs when the economy is below potential output. Significant proportions of markets or one very important market experience price increases not related to demand pressure. 13-40 17 Jobs and Unemployment Unemployment and Inflation A.W. Phillips. “The Relation Between Unemployment and the Rate of Change of Money Wage Rates in the United Kingdom, 1861-1957.” Economica, November, 1958. This work gave us the Phillips Curve, or the negative relationship between unemployment and inflation. 17 The Phillips Curve 5 A Inflation 4 3 2 B 1 0 4 5 6 7 Unemployment rate 13-42 Jobs and Unemployment Inflation Vs Unemployment in the United States, 1900-1960 During the period 1900-1960 in the United States, a low unemployment rate was typically associated with a high inflation rate, and a high unemployment rate was typically associated with a low or negative inflation rate. 17 Jobs and Unemployment Inflation versus Unemployment in the United States, 1948-1969 The steady decline in the U.S. unemployment rate throughout the 1960s was associated with a steady increase in the inflation rate. This is the negative relation between unemployment and inflation that A.W. Phillips found for the United Kingdom, and Robert Solow and Paul Samuelson found for the United States (or the original Phillips curve). 17 Inflation rate The Rise of the Phillips Curve (19541968) 1968 1956 4 3 1966 1967 1957 1955 1964 1965 1959 1954 2 1 0 4 5 Unemployment rate 13-45 1960 1963 1962 6 1958 1961 7 Jobs and Unemployment In the 1970s life changed... Beginning in 1970, the relation between the unemployment rate and the inflation rate disappeared in the United States. Inflation versus Unemployment in the United States, 1970-2000 (next slide) 17