Retention and Graduation Rates of
IPEDS Cohorts, and
Student, Faculty and Institutional
Characteristics Impacting Outcomes
California State University Dominguez Hills
October 22, 2014
Table of Contents
4
IPEDS 6-Year Graduation Rates for First-Time
Full-Time Freshmen and 1-3 Year Return Rates
Over 10 Years
5
Projected Outcomes: IPEDS 6-Year Graduation
Rates for First-Time Full-Time Freshmen
6
Return Rates for CSUDH Students in IPEDS
Cohorts in 22 Years: Fall 1990 - 2012
7
8
9
15 CSU 2006 IPEDS Cohort 6-Year Graduation Rate
by Ethnicity: Sorted by Black Students
16 CSU 2006 IPEDS Cohort 6-Year Graduation Rate
by Ethnicity: Sorted by Asian Students
17
IPEDS 6-Year Graduation Rate Trends for
All CSU System Institutions
CSUDH Asian Students by Country of Origin: Fall
2013
18
Commitment to Access: 2015-16 Impaction
Status by First-Time Freshmen & Upper Division
Transfers
CSUDH Campus Profile for All Students by
Gender: Fall 2013
19 CSU 2006 IPEDS Cohort 6-Year Graduation
Rate by Gender
2015-16 Impaction Status by Program
10 Number of All CSUDH First-Time Freshmen by
Admissions Basis: 14-Year Trend
11
14 CSU 2006 IPEDS Cohort 6-Year Graduation Rate
by Ethnicity: Sorted by Latino Students
Academic Preparation Levels of CSUDH IPEDS
Cohorts by Admissions Basis: Fall 2008 – Fall
2013
20 CSUDH 2006 IPEDS Cohort 6-Year Graduation
Rate by Gender
21 CSU 2006 IPEDS Cohort 6-Year Graduation
Rate by % of Pell Grant Recipients
22 CSU 2006 IPEDS Cohort 6-Year Graduation
Rate by Federal Loan 3-Year Default Rate
12 CSUDH Campus Profile for All Students & LA
County Population by Ethnicity: Fall 2013
23 CSUDH Campus Profile by % Part-Time: Fall
2013
13
24 CSU 2006 IPEDS Cohort 6-Year Graduation Rate
by % of Part-Time Students
CSU 2006 IPEDS Cohort 6-Year Graduation Rate
by URM vs. Non-URM
Table of Contents….(continued)
25 CSU 2006 IPEDS Cohort 6-Year Graduation Rate
by % Students of Age 25 and Over
26 CSU 2006 IPEDS Cohort 6-Year Graduation
Rate by Average High School GPA
27 CSU 2006 IPEDS Cohort 6-Year Graduation
Rate by Median SAT
28 CSU 2006 IPEDS Cohort 6-Year Graduation
Rate by Percent of Full-time Faculty
29 CSU 2006 IPEDS Cohort 6-Year Graduation
Rate by Full-time Undergraduate Student to
Faculty Ratio
30 CSU 2006 IPEDS Cohort 6-Year Graduation
Rate by Total Educational and General
Expenditures
31 Summary: Retention and Graduation Rates
32 IPEDS Definitions
33 IPEDS Definitions (continued)
4
IPEDS 6-Year Graduation Rates for First-Time Full-Time Freshmen
and 1-3 Year Return Rates Over 10 Years
Cohort
Cohort 6-Yr End
Entry Yr. Point
N
One Year Return Rate
(x)
N
%
Two Year Return Rate Three Year Return Rate
Actual Six Year Grad Rate (y)
(x)
(x)
N
%
N
%
N
%
Fall 2014
2020
n/a
Fall 2013
2019
1460
Fall 2012
2018
1133
898
79.3%
Fall 2011
2017
1100
845
76.8%
748
68.0%
Fall 2010
2016
982
782
79.6%
671
68.3%
599
61.0%
Fall 2009
2015
1070
739
69.1%
660
61.7%
588
55.0%
Fall 2008
2014
889
607
68.3%
513
57.7%
469
52.8%
Fall 2007
2013
913
589
64.5%
485
53.1%
428
46.9%
268
29.4%
Fall 2006
2012
977
598
61.2%
458
46.9%
433
44.3%
272
27.8%
Fall 2005
2011
705
440
62.4%
352
49.9%
308
43.7%
172
24.4%
Fall 2004
2010
673
493
73.3%
409
60.8%
358
53.2%
208
30.9%
Fall 2003
2009
639
438
68.5%
387
60.6%
358
56.0%
223
34.9%
Fall 2002
2008
630
388
61.6%
378
60.0%
336
53.3%
214
34.0%
Fall 2001
2007
561
341
60.8%
319
56.9%
292
52.0%
158
28.2%
Fall 2000
2006
495
338
68.3%
309
62.4%
270
54.5%
163
32.9%
Fall 1999
2005
454
314
69.2%
271
59.7%
236
52.0%
171
37.7%
Fall 1998
2004
465
341
73.3%
297
63.9%
266
57.2%
173
37.2%
Highlights:
CSUDH is poised to show
marked improvements in the
retention and graduation rates
of freshmen beginning with
the cohort of 2010.
Past performance: Students in
the 1998-07 IPEDS cohorts had
low 6-year graduation rates
ranging from 27% to 37%.
Time of transition: The 2008
and 2009 cohorts yield
markedly higher 1, 2 and 3year return rates.
Evidence of significant
improvement in the future:
The 2010, 2011 and 2012
cohorts show a nearly 10 point
increase in 1-year persistence
rates and similarly strong
improvement in 2 &3 year
return rates.
5
Projected Outcomes: IPEDS 6-Year Graduation Rates for First-Time
Projections Based on Regression Analysis of 1, 2,
Full-Time Freshmen
3-Year Graduation Rates: Fall 1998 - 07 Cohorts
(10 Years)
Cohort
Cohort
End Point
N
Fall 2014
2020
n/a
Fall 2013
2019
1460
Fall 2012
2018
Fall 2011
One Year Return Rate (x) Two Year Return Rate (x) Three Year Return Rate (x) Actual Six Year Grad Rate (y)
N
%
N
%
N
1133
898
79.3%
2017
1100
845
76.8%
748
68.0%
Fall 2010
2016
982
782
79.6%
671
68.3%
599
Fall 2009
2015
1070
739
69.1%
660
61.7%
Fall 2008
2014
889
607
68.3%
513
Fall 2007
2013
913
589
64.5%
Fall 2006
2012
977
598
Fall 2005
2011
705
Fall 2004
2010
Fall 2003
%
N
%
Projected IPEDS 6-Yr Projected IPEDS 6-Yr Projected IPEDS 6-Yr
Grad Rate from 1Yr Grad Rate from 2Yr Grad Rate from 3Yr
Return Rate
Return Rate
Return Rate
(y=.5699x -.0606)
(y=.6161x -.0364)
(y=.7355x-.0601)
39.1%
37.7%
38.3%
61.0%
39.3%
38.5%
38.9%
588
55.0%
33.3%
34.4%
34.4%
57.7%
469
52.8%
32.9%
31.9%
32.8%
485
53.1%
428
46.9%
268
29.4%
61.2%
458
46.9%
433
44.3%
272
27.8%
440
62.4%
352
49.9%
308
43.7%
172
24.4%
673
493
73.3%
409
60.8%
358
53.2%
208
30.9%
2009
639
438
68.5%
387
60.6%
358
56.0%
223
34.9%
Fall 2002
2008
630
388
61.6%
378
60.0%
336
53.3%
214
34.0%
Fall 2001
2007
561
341
60.8%
319
56.9%
292
52.0%
158
28.2%
Fall 2000
2006
495
338
68.3%
309
62.4%
270
54.5%
163
32.9%
Fall 1999
2005
454
314
69.2%
271
59.7%
236
52.0%
171
37.7%
Fall 1998
2004
465
341
73.3%
297
63.9%
266
57.2%
173
37.2%
Highlights: Projected Outcomes
Projected 6-year graduation rate for cohorts
beginning with 2010 is 39%. This projection
is based on a regression formula of 1, 2, and
3-year return rates for CSUDH cohorts in the
last 10 years (1998-2007).
Aspirational target: A 6-year graduation
rate with a stretch goal of 60% is to be
achieved by 2020.
6
Return Rates for CSUDH Students in IPEDS Cohorts in 22 Years:
Fall 1990 - 2012
Number first
Enrolled
Term of entry
Fall 2012
1,133
Fall 2011
Fall 2010
Fall 2009
Fall 2008
Fall 2007
Fall 2006
Fall 2005
Fall 2004
Fall 2003
Fall 2002
Fall 2001
Fall 2000
Fall 1999
Fall 1998
Fall 1997
Fall 1996
Fall 1995
Fall 1994
Fall 1993
Fall 1992
Fall 1991
Fall 1990
1,100
982
1,070
889
913
977
705
673
639
630
561
495
454
465
512
476
467
467
389
486
338
328
One Year Return Rate
N
898
%
79.3%
845
782
739
607
589
598
440
493
438
388
341
338
314
341
397
366
350
349
287
347
249
243
76.8%
79.6%
69.1%
68.3%
64.5%
61.2%
62.4%
73.3%
68.5%
61.6%
60.8%
68.3%
69.2%
73.3%
77.5%
76.9%
74.9%
74.7%
73.8%
71.4%
73.7%
74.1%
Two Year Return Rate
N
%
748
671
660
513
485
458
352
409
387
378
319
309
271
297
330
301
277
280
226
278
186
193
68.0%
68.3%
61.7%
57.7%
53.1%
46.9%
49.9%
60.8%
60.6%
60.0%
56.9%
62.4%
59.7%
63.9%
64.5%
63.2%
59.3%
60.0%
58.1%
57.2%
55.0%
58.8%
Three Year Return Rate
N
%
599
588
469
428
433
308
358
358
336
292
270
236
266
283
270
231
228
196
244
163
167
61.0%
55.0%
52.8%
46.9%
44.3%
43.7%
53.2%
56.0%
53.3%
52.0%
54.5%
52.0%
57.2%
55.3%
56.7%
49.5%
48.8%
50.4%
50.2%
48.2%
50.9%
System-wide Average: The CSU system-wide IPEDS cohort of 2007 yielded a 1-year
persistence rate of 79% and 2-year rate of 68.3%
Highlights: Return Rates
The most recent three cohorts
have highest return rates in 22
years.
• Fall 2012 IPEDS cohort 1-year
return rate of 79.3% is the
highest such rate in 22 years.
• Fall 2010 IPEDS cohort 2-year
return rate of 68.3 % is the
highest such rate in in 22
years.
• Fall 2010 IPEDS cohort 3-year
return rate of 61 % is the
highest such rate in in 22
years.
7
IPEDS 6-Year Graduation Rate Trends for
All CSU System Institutions (Source: College Results On-line)
Sort ↓
Peers Not -Impacted 6-Year Grad Rates Over Time
First-Year
Freshmen
√
Peer
Peer
√
√
√
Peer
Peer
DH
Peer
√
√
√
IPEDS
IPEDS
IPEDS
IPEDS
IPEDS
Gap or
Cohort
Cohort
Cohort
Cohort
Cohort Difference
2003 Rate 2004 Rate 2005 Rate 2006 Rate 2007 Rate 2003-2007
California State University-Long Beach
54.4%
54.0%
54.0%
56.9%
60.3%
5.9%
California State University-Stanislaus
California State University-Northridge
California State University-Los Angeles
California State University-Fullerton
San Jose State University
49.5%
43.7%
33.7%
51.6%
46.4%
49.5%
47.9%
37.4%
51.4%
48.0%
49.1%
46.1%
36.5%
50.1%
46.4%
48.7%
48.0%
36.5%
51.2%
46.9%
52.0%
45.8%
35.7%
53.5%
48.1%
2.5%
2.1%
2.0%
1.9%
1.7%
California State University-Bakersfield
Sonoma State University
California State University-Fresno
California State University-San Marcos
San Diego State University
Cal State Poly University-Pomona
38.4%
52.9%
47.8%
47.3%
66.3%
52.9%
43.0%
56.9%
50.6%
44.2%
66.2%
56.6%
41.4%
56.7%
49.4%
48.5%
65.6%
50.3%
38.6%
54.9%
48.1%
44.6%
66.0%
50.8%
39.5%
53.9%
48.6%
47.9%
66.2%
52.4%
1.1%
1.0%
0.8%
0.6%
-0.1%
-0.5%
California State Univ. -Channel Islands
California State University-Sacramento
Humboldt State University
California State University-Chico
San Francisco State University
Cal Poly State Univ.-San Luis Obispo
California State Univ. -Monterey Bay
California State Univ. -San Bernardino
52.5%
43.9%
41.5%
58.0%
47.5%
71.7%
41.5%
45.5%
58.4%
42.0%
36.6%
61.8%
48.0%
72.9%
40.9%
44.0%
53.9%
41.6%
39.7%
59.0%
46.5%
74.6%
37.8%
44.6%
51.1%
41.4%
40.5%
57.2%
47.3%
72.2%
36.8%
43.5%
51.6%
42.9%
40.0%
56.1%
45.5%
69.7%
38.3%
41.1%
-0.9%
-1.0%
-1.5%
-1.9%
-2.0%
-2.0%
-3.2%
-4.4%
California State Univ. -Dominguez Hills
34.9%
30.9%
24.4%
27.6%
29.4%
-5.5%
California State University-East Bay
47.6%
45.1%
43.3%
41.0%
38.1%
-9.5%
California Maritime Academy
68.7%
61.1%
62.3%
57.9%
58.7%
-10.0%
51.3%
51.4%
51.8%
System-wide Average for All CSU Institutions
51.3% 53.4%
Highlights:
System-wide Trend for
6-Year Graduation
Rates
CSUDH IPEDS 6-year
graduation rates show
a decline during the
last 5 years.
In comparison, our
peers CSU-LA and
CSU-Bakersfield have
made significant gains
over this same period.
The only system peer
that has shown a
bigger decline is
CSU- East Bay.
8
Commitment to Access: 2015-16 Impaction Status by First-Time
Freshmen & Upper Division Transfers
CSU Campus
First-Time
Freshmen
Upper-Division Transfers
Bakersfield
Channel Islands
Chico
Dominguez Hills
East Bay
Fresno
Fullerton
Humboldt
Long Beach
Not Impacted
Not Impacted
Freshman
Not Impacted
Not Impacted
Freshman
Freshman
Freshman
Freshman
Not Impacted
Not Impacted
Transfer
Not Impacted
Not Impacted
Transfer
Transfer
Not Impacted
Transfer
Los Angeles
Freshman
Transfer
Maritime Academy
Monterey Bay
Northridge
Pomona
Not Impacted
Freshman
Freshman
Freshman
Not Impacted
Not Impacted
Not Impacted
Transfer
Sacramento
Freshman
Transfer
San Bernardino
San Diego
Freshman
Freshman
Transfer
Transfer
San Francisco
Freshman
Transfer
San José
San Luis Obispo
San Marcos
Freshman
Freshman
Freshman
Transfer
Transfer
Transfer
Sonoma
Freshman
Transfer
Stanislaus
Not Impacted
Not Impacted
Source: http://www.calstate.edu/sas/impaction-campus-info.shtml
Highlights: Impacted Campuses
CSUDH is one of 6 campuses that
have not declared first-time
freshmen impaction where the
number of applications received
from fully qualified applicants
during initial filling period
exceeds the number of available
spaces.
CSUDH maintains open
admissions for all students
meeting CSU system’s
admissions eligibility
requirements.
The absence of selective
admissions criteria at Dominguez
Hills represents a firm
commitment to upholding
educati9onal access in the
region.
9
2015-16 Impaction Status by Program
Impacted Programs
Nursing, Post-Licensure (RN to Nursing Degree; Nursing, pre-licensure
Nursing, Pre-Licensure
Music, Option in Recording Arts; Nursing, Pre-Licensure
None
Business Administration; Nursing, Pre-Licensure
Athletic Training; Nursing (RN to BSN); Pre-Nursing
All Undergrad programs, Pre-Programs, Undeclared/Undecided
Biology; Botany; Environmental Science; Wildlife; Zoology
All Undergrad programs, Pre-Programs, Undeclared/Undecided
Biology; Business Admin-Accounting; Business Admin - Mgmt; Business Admin - Mktg Mgmt; Child Development; Criminal Justice; Nursing, PreLos Angeles
Licensure; Psychology; Social Work; Undeclared/Undecided (with an interest in Nursing)
Maritime Academy Facilities Engineering Technology; Marine Engineering Technology; Marine Transportation; Mechanical Engineering
Monterey Bay
None
Northridge
Accounting (Professional Accountancy); Business Admin - Insurance and Financial Services; Finance
Aerospace Engineering; Animal Health Science; Animal Science; Architecture; Biology; Biotechnology; Chemical Engineering; Chemistry; Civil
Pomona
Engineering; Communication; Computer Engineering; Computer Science; Electrical Engineering; Environmental Biology; Kinesiology (Exercise Science
Option); Mechanical Engineering; Music (Industry Studies Option); Psychology; Sociology; Undeclared/Undecided
Biological Science; Business Administration- Impacted in all Options; Criminal Justice-Impacted in General; Graphic Design- Impacted in General; Health
Sacramento
Science-Impacted in all Options; Nursing, Pre-Licensure; Photography-Impacted in General; Psychology - Impacted in General
San Bernardino
Criminal Justice; Kinesiology - Pre-Physical Therapy; Nursing, Pre-Licensure; Social Work - Pre-Social Work
San Diego
All Undergrad programs, Pre-Programs, Undeclared/Undecided
Apparel Design and Merchandising; Biochemistry; Biology- Impacted in all Options; Business Administration (Accounting); Chemistry; Child and
Adolescent Development- Impacted in all Options; Communication Studies; Criminal Justice; Dietetics; Environmental Studies - Impacted in all Options;
San Francisco
Health Education; Industrial Arts/Design - Impacted in all Options; Interior Design; Kinesiology - Impacted in all Options; Nursing (General); Psychology;
Social Work; Sociology; Undeclared/Undecided (with an interest in Nursing); Visual Communication Design
San José
All Undergrad programs, Pre-Programs, Undeclared/Undecided
San Luis Obispo
All Undergrad programs, Pre-Programs, Undeclared/Undecided
San Marcos
Business Admin; Communication; Kinesiology; Mass Media; Nursing, Pre-Licensure
Biology; Business Administration- Impacted also in Pre-Business; Communication Studies; Criminology and Criminal Justice Studies; Environmental
Sonoma
Studies and Planning - Impacted in all Options; Human Development; Kinesiology- Impacted in all Options; Liberal Studies; Nursing (Pre-Nursing and
Pre-Licensure BSN); Psychology
Stanislaus
Nursing, Pre-Licensure
Source: http://www.calstate.edu/sas/impaction-campus-info.shtml
CSU Campus
Bakersfield
Channel Islands
Chico
Dominguez Hills
East Bay
Fresno
Fullerton
Humboldt
Long Beach
10
Number of All CSUDH First-Time Freshmen by Admissions Basis: 14Year Trend
Entry
Year
Regular
Admit
Special
Admit
Total
% of
Special
Admit
2014
Graduating
Class
2020
6-Year
Graduation
Rate%
60% Goal
2013
1,142
105
1,547
6.8%
2019
2012
1,175
36
1,211
3.0%
2018
2011
1,118
46
1,164
3.9%
2017
2010
1,980
41
1,021
4.0%
2016
2009
947
162
1,109
14.6%
2015
2008
553
385
938
41.0%
2014
30%
2007
592
393
985
39.9%
2013
29.4%
2006
683
363
1,046
34.7%
2012
27.6%
2005
448
319
767
41.6%
2011
24.4%
2004
588
126
714
17.6%
2010
30.9%
2003
503
182
685
26.6%
2009
34.9%
2002
479
185
664
27.9%
2008
34.0%
2001
324
257
581
44.2%
2007
28.2%
2000
290
228
518
44.0%
2006
32.9%
Highlights: Freshmen
Composition by
Admissions Basis
From 2000-08, CSUDH
admitted very large
numbers of special admit
students (average=35.3%
of FTF class).
In 5 of the 6 cases when
more than a third of the
FTF class were special
admits and no special
Academic Affairs
interventions were
implemented, the 6 year
grad rate dropped below
the CA cutoff of 30%.
11
Academic Preparation Levels of CSUDH IPEDS Cohorts by
Admissions Basis: Fall 2008 – Fall 2013
Total Admits - IPEDS First-Time Freshmen
College Prep Stats
Count
Mean HSGPA
Mean SAT
Needs Both ENG & MAT
Remediation
Fall 2008
Fall 2009
Fall 2010
Fall 2011
Fall 2012
Fall 2013
889
2.90
814
1,069
2.97
831
982
3.07
850
1,100
3.05
839
1,133
3.09
853
1,460
3.07
848
39%
6%
4%
675
807
620
547
586
724
7%
Regular Admits - IPEDS First-Time Freshmen
College Prep Stats
Count
Mean HSGPA
Mean SAT
Needs Both ENG & MAT
Remediation
Fall 2008
522
3.12
854
Fall 2009
914
3.03
839
Fall 2010
941
3.09
853
Fall 2011
1,052
3.06
843
Fall 2012
1,096
3.10
855
Fall 2013
1,353
3.09
853
362
669
589
517
560
643
Special Admits - IPEDS First-Time Freshmen
College Prep Stats
Count
Mean HSGPA
Mean SAT
Needs Both ENG & MAT
Remediation
% Change
2008 - 13
Fall 2008
367
2.58
767
Fall 2009
155
2.63
788
Fall 2010
41
2.70
785
Fall 2011
48
2.70
765
Fall 2012
37
2.70
798
Fall 2013
107
2.77
782
313
138
31
30
26
81
% Change
2008 - 13
61%
-1%
0%
44%
% Change
2008 - 13
-243%
7%
2%
-286%
Highlights: Changes in
Preparation Level
The preparation level of
students in IPEDS cohorts
under Total Admits is
improving: Mean HSGPA GPA
is up 6%, and Mean SAT is up
4%.
The increase in student
preparation has translated
into a decrease in the need for
remediation among Total
Admits (N,1,460) in Fall 2013.
The number of Total Admits
has gone up 39%, however
their need for remediation in
both English and Math has
only gone up by 7% during Fall
2008-13.
12
CSU 2006 IPEDS Cohort 6-Year Graduation Rate
by URM vs. Non-URM (Source: College Results On-line)
Sort ↓
Peers
Peer
Peer
CSUDH
Peer
Peer
IPEDS Cohort
2006 Grad Rate
URM
Non-URM
Gap (URM-Non URM)
CSU Maritime Academy
CSU-East Bay
CSU-Humboldt
CSU-Los Angeles
CSUN
57.9%
41.0%
40.5%
36.5%
48.0%
35.0%
26.9%
27.3%
32.1%
40.9%
63.1%
50.1%
47.4%
47.4%
55.4%
-28.1%
-23.2%
-20.1%
-15.3%
-14.5%
CSU-Channel Islands
SJSU
CSU-Chico
San Luis Obispo
CSU-Fullerton
CSU-Pomona
CSU-Fresno
51.1%
46.9%
57.2%
72.2%
51.2%
50.8%
48.1%
42.4%
37.4%
46.7%
61.9%
44.2%
43.8%
42.1%
56.5%
51.3%
59.8%
74.2%
55.8%
55.3%
52.5%
-14.1%
-13.9%
-13.1%
-12.3%
-11.6%
-11.5%
-10.4%
CSU-Dominguez Hills
CSU-Long Beach
27.6%
56.9%
27.1%
51.4%
36.8%
60.8%
-9.7%
-9.4%
CSU-Monterey Bay
36.8%
31.5%
40.4%
-8.9%
CSU-San Bernardino
Sonoma State
CSU-Sacramento
CSU-Stanislaus
CSU-San Marcos
SDSU
SFSU
CSU-Bakersfield
43.5%
54.9%
41.4%
48.7%
44.6%
66.0%
47.3%
38.6%
40.6%
48.9%
36.5%
44.9%
40.6%
61.6%
45.3%
37.4%
49.0%
56.1%
43.6%
51.0%
46.4%
67.3%
48.8%
38.7%
-8.4%
-7.2%
-7.1%
-6.1%
-5.8%
-5.7%
-3.5%
-1.3%
Institution
Highlights: Under
Represented Minorities (URM)
URM students have one of the
lowest 6-year graduation rates
of 27.1%.
The gap between URM and
Non-URM 6-year graduation
rate places CSUDH in the
middle of CSU system.
However, this gap is an artifact
of the highly diverse student
body on campus.
URMs include Black, American
Indian, Native
Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, and
Hispanics.
13
CSU 2006 IPEDS Cohort 6-Year Graduation Rate by Ethnicity: Sorted
by Latino Students (Source: College Results On-line)
Sort ↓
Grad Rates by Race
Peers OR Gender
SDSU
San Luis Obispo
CSU-Long Beach
Sonoma State
SFSU
CSU-Chico
CSU-Stanislaus
IPEDS Cohort
2006 Grad
Rate
66.00%
72.20%
56.90%
54.90%
47.30%
57.20%
48.70%
Black
63.30%
66.70%
50.40%
42.90%
33.30%
43.80%
29.40%
Latino
61.30%
61.20%
51.50%
51.20%
49.30%
47.30%
46.40%
Native
American
60.00%
64.00%
54.30%
33.30%
50.00%
45.00%
N/A
Pacific
Islander
60.80%
50.00%
53.80%
58.80%
42.60%
58.80%
30.00%
Asian
65.10%
65.20%
60.70%
44.10%
53.80%
44.10%
56.70%
White
67.90%
75.80%
61.00%
57.30%
44.40%
61.20%
49.40%
CSU-Channel Islands
CSU-Fullerton
CSUN
CSU-Sacramento
CSU-Fresno
CSU-Pomona
Peer CSU-Bakersfield
51.10%
51.20%
48.00%
41.40%
48.10%
50.80%
38.60%
25.00%
41.30%
31.60%
26.20%
34.00%
54.20%
15.90%
46.00%
44.60%
43.90%
43.80%
43.50%
42.70%
42.30%
N/A
50.00%
53.80%
32.40%
65.20%
25.00%
N/A
N/A
48.00%
40.90%
35.10%
43.80%
62.50%
N/A
66.70%
55.40%
50.90%
37.70%
46.20%
55.50%
43.60%
55.00%
56.10%
57.70%
47.60%
55.60%
55.00%
37.50%
Peer CSU-San Bernardino
CSU-San Marcos
CSU-Humboldt
SJSU
43.50%
44.60%
40.50%
46.90%
36.60%
50.00%
8.80%
35.70%
42.10%
39.80%
38.60%
38.00%
31.30%
N/A
19.00%
42.90%
70.00%
N/A
N/A
50.00%
49.30%
52.20%
47.10%
51.70%
48.90%
45.20%
47.40%
50.80%
CSU-Monterey Bay
Peer CSU-Los Angeles
CSUD
H CSU-Dominguez Hills
Peer CSU-East Bay
CSU Maritime
Academy
36.80%
36.50%
15.00%
26.50%
34.20%
32.70%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
44.00%
51.00%
40.10%
32.90%
27.60%
41.00%
21.60%
23.60%
31.10%
30.70%
N/A
N/A
8.30%
28.60%
28.30%
51.60%
46.30%
46.80%
57.90%
N/A
21.40%
N/A
N/A
47.10%
66.00%
Highlights: Ethnicity
Sorted by Latino
Graduation rate
Latino students
represent 54% of CSUDH
enrollment ( Slide 9).
This slide is sorted by
graduation rates of
Latino students and
shows that their rates are
one of the lowest in the
system.
14
CSU 2006 IPEDS Cohort 6-Year Graduation Rate by Ethnicity: Sorted
by Sort
Black
Students (Source: College Results On-line)
↓
Peers
IPEDS Cohort
Grad Rates by Race OR 2006 Grad
Rate
Gender
Black
Latino
Native American
Pacific
Islander
Asian
White
CSU Maritime
Academy
San Luis Obispo
SDSU
CSU-Pomona
CSU-Long Beach
CSU-San Marcos
CSU-Chico
Sonoma State
CSU-Fullerton
57.9%
72.2%
66.0%
50.8%
56.9%
44.6%
57.2%
54.9%
51.2%
N/A
66.7%
63.3%
54.2%
50.4%
50.0%
43.8%
42.9%
41.3%
21.4%
61.2%
61.3%
42.7%
51.5%
39.8%
47.3%
51.2%
44.6%
N/A
64.0%
60.0%
25.0%
54.3%
N/A
45.0%
33.3%
50.0%
N/A
50.0%
60.8%
62.5%
53.8%
N/A
58.8%
58.8%
48.0%
47.1%
65.2%
65.1%
55.5%
60.7%
52.2%
44.1%
44.1%
55.4%
66.0%
75.8%
67.9%
55.0%
61.0%
45.2%
61.2%
57.3%
56.1%
43.5%
46.9%
48.1%
47.3%
48.0%
48.7%
36.5%
41.4%
36.6%
35.7%
34.0%
33.3%
31.6%
29.4%
26.5%
26.2%
42.1%
38.0%
43.5%
49.3%
43.9%
46.4%
32.7%
43.8%
31.3%
42.9%
65.2%
50.0%
53.8%
N/A
N/A
32.4%
70.0%
50.0%
43.8%
42.6%
40.9%
30.0%
N/A
35.1%
49.3%
51.7%
46.2%
53.8%
50.9%
56.7%
51.0%
37.7%
48.9%
50.8%
55.6%
44.4%
57.7%
49.4%
32.9%
47.6%
51.1%
41.0%
25.0%
23.6%
46.0%
30.7%
N/A
N/A
N/A
28.6%
66.7%
51.6%
55.0%
46.8%
27.6%
38.6%
21.6%
15.9%
31.1%
42.3%
N/A
N/A
8.3%
N/A
28.3%
43.6%
46.3%
37.5%
36.8%
40.5%
15.0%
8.8%
34.2%
38.6%
N/A
19.0%
N/A
N/A
44.0%
47.1%
40.1%
47.4%
CSU-San Bernardino
SJSU
CSU-Fresno
SFSU
CSUN
CSU-Stanislaus
Peer CSU-Los Angeles
CSU-Sacramento
CSU-Channel
Islands
Peer CSU-East Bay
CSU-Dominguez
CSUDH Hills
Peer CSU-Bakersfield
Peer
CSU-Monterey Bay
CSU-Humboldt
Highlights: Ethnicity Sorted
by Black Graduation Rate
Black students represent the
second highest (17.7%)
ethnic segment among
CSUDH students in Fall
2013.
This slide is sorted by the 6year graduation rate for
Black CSUDH students and
shows that their rate is also
one of the lowest in the
system.
15
CSU 2006 IPEDS Cohort 6-Year Graduation Rate by Ethnicity: Sorted
Sort ↓
by Asian Students
(Source: College Results On-line)
IPEDS Cohort
Grad Rates by Race 2006 Grad
Peers OR Gender
Rate
CSU-Channel
Islands
51.10%
San Luis Obispo
72.20%
SDSU
66.00%
Black
Latino
Native
American
25.00%
66.70%
63.30%
46.00%
61.20%
61.30%
N/A
64.00%
60.00%
N/A
50.00%
60.80%
66.70%
65.20%
65.10%
55.00%
75.80%
67.90%
Pacific Islander
Asian
White
CSU-Long Beach
56.90%
50.40%
51.50%
54.30%
53.80%
60.70%
61.00%
CSU-Stanislaus
CSU-Pomona
CSU-Fullerton
SFSU
CSU-San Marcos
SJSU
Peer CSU-East Bay
Peer CSU-Los Angeles
CSUN
CSU-San
Peer Bernardino
48.70%
50.80%
51.20%
47.30%
44.60%
46.90%
41.00%
36.50%
48.00%
29.40%
54.20%
41.30%
33.30%
50.00%
35.70%
23.60%
26.50%
31.60%
46.40%
42.70%
44.60%
49.30%
39.80%
38.00%
30.70%
32.70%
43.90%
N/A
25.00%
50.00%
50.00%
N/A
42.90%
N/A
N/A
53.80%
30.00%
62.50%
48.00%
42.60%
N/A
50.00%
28.60%
N/A
40.90%
56.70%
55.50%
55.40%
53.80%
52.20%
51.70%
51.60%
51.00%
50.90%
49.40%
55.00%
56.10%
44.40%
45.20%
50.80%
46.80%
32.90%
57.70%
43.50%
36.60%
42.10%
31.30%
70.00%
49.30%
48.90%
CSU-Humboldt
CSU Maritime
Academy
CSU-Fresno
Sonoma State
CSU-Chico
40.50%
8.80%
38.60%
19.00%
N/A
47.10%
47.40%
57.90%
48.10%
54.90%
57.20%
N/A
34.00%
42.90%
43.80%
21.40%
43.50%
51.20%
47.30%
N/A
65.20%
33.30%
45.00%
N/A
43.80%
58.80%
58.80%
47.10%
46.20%
44.10%
44.10%
66.00%
55.60%
57.30%
61.20%
CSU-Monterey Bay
36.80%
15.00%
34.20%
N/A
N/A
44.00%
40.10%
Peer CSU-Bakersfield
38.60%
15.90%
42.30%
N/A
N/A
43.60%
37.50%
CSU-Sacramento
CSU-Dominguez
CSUDH Hills
41.40%
26.20%
43.80%
32.40%
35.10%
37.70%
47.60%
27.60%
21.60%
31.10%
N/A
8.30%
28.30%
46.30%
Highlights:
Ethnicity Sorted by
Asian Graduation
Rate
Asian students
represent 11% of
CSUDH students in
Fall 2013 (Slide 9).
This slide is sorted
by the 6-year
graduation rate for
Asian students
shows that their
rate is the lowest in
the system.
16
CSUDH Asian Students by Country of Origin: Fall 2013
Asian Indian
Bangladeshi
Burmese
Cambodian
Chinese
Filipino
Hmong
Indo Chinese
Indonesian
Japanese
Korean
Laotian
Malaysian
Nepalese
Okinawan
Other Asian
Pakistani
Singaporean
Sri Lankan
Taiwanese
Thai
Vietnamese
Unknown Ethnicity
Totals
CSUDH Asian Students by Country of Origin in Fall 2013
N
%
80
5.4%
5
0.3%
4
0.3%
99
6.7%
Native Hawaiian/ Other Pac Islander (URM)
121
8.2%
N
%
562
37.9% Fijian
6
11.1%
4
0.3% Guamanian/Chamorro
4
7.4%
7
0.5% Mariana Islander
1
1.9%
8
0.5% Native Hawaiian
2
3.7%
98
6.6% Other Pacific Islander
9
16.7%
107
7.2% Other Polynesian
0
0.0%
4
0.3% Papua New Guinean
0
0.0%
3
0.2% Samoan
21
38.9%
4
0.3% Tongan
10
18.5%
1
0.1% Unknown Ethnicity
1
1.9%
49
3.3% Totals
54
100.0%
16
1.1%
1
0.1%
9
0.6%
28
1.9%
23
1.5%
236
15.9%
15
1.0% Note: Table does not include those who claimed two
1,484
100.0% or more ethnicities with Asian being one.
Highlights: Asian
Students by
Country of Origin in
Fall 2013
Filipino and
Vietnamese
students together
represent over 50%
of Asian students on
campus.
URMs include Black,
American Indian,
Native
Hawaiian/Pacific
Islander, and
Hispanics.
17
CSUDH Campus Profile for All Students & LA County Population by
Ethnicity: Fall 2013
CSUDH Campus Profile for All Students
Number
%
39
1,484
2,385
7,334
54
1,730
426
13,452
864
354
0.3
11
17.7
54.5
0.4
12.9
3.2
100
American Indian / Alaska Native
Asian
Black / African American
Hispanic / Latino
Native Hawaiian / Other Pacific Islander
White
Two or more races
Subtotal
Unknown
Nonresident Alien
Proportion of Los Angeles County Population by Race
Census Year
1990*
2000
African American/Black
11.20%
9.80%
Hispanic/Latino
37.80%
44.60%
Asian/Pacific Islander
10.80%
11.90%
White
40.80%
31.10%
Los Angeles County Population (Numbers) by Race
Census Year
1990*
2000
African American/Black
992,974
930,957
Hispanic/Latino
3,351,242
4,242,213
Asian/Pacific Islander
954,485
1,137,500
White
3,618,850
2,959,614
*Not census but most recent estimate info from US Census
Highlight: Ethnic Breakdown
of CSUDH Students
The largest ethnic group
among CSUDH students is
Hispanic/Latino (54.5%).
The second largest ethnic
group is that of Black/African
American students.
2013*
9.20%
48.30%
14.60%
27.20%
2013*
981,673
4,838,244
1,462,491
2,724,642
Census data shows that the
Hispanic/Latino population in
the Los Angles County has
been steadily increasing. The
CSUDH student population
shows similar trends.
18
CSU 2006 IPEDS Cohort 6-Year Graduation Rate by Gender
(Source: College Results On-line)
Sort ↓
IPEDS Cohort
Grad Rates by Race OR 2006 Grad
Peer Inst Gender
Rate
San Luis Obispo
72.2%
CSU-Pomona
50.8%
Peer CSU-Bakersfield
38.6%
CSU-Fullerton
51.2%
CSU-Sacramento
41.4%
SJSU
46.9%
CSUN
48.0%
CSU-Fresno
48.1%
SDSU
66.0%
Gap (Female-Male)
Female
79.9%
57.7%
42.5%
55.2%
45.4%
51.3%
51.7%
51.6%
69.4%
Male
66.3%
45.5%
31.6%
44.9%
35.4%
41.9%
42.8%
42.9%
61.0%
13.6%
12.2%
10.9%
10.3%
10.0%
9.4%
8.9%
8.7%
8.4%
CSU-Channel Islands
CSU-Chico
51.1%
57.2%
53.8%
60.6%
46.3%
53.2%
7.5%
7.4%
CSU-San Bernardino
CSU-Stanislaus
CSU-Long Beach
CSU-San Marcos
CSU-Humboldt
CSU-Los Angeles
CSU-East Bay
43.5%
48.7%
56.9%
44.6%
40.5%
36.5%
41.0%
45.9%
50.9%
58.9%
46.7%
42.5%
38.1%
42.7%
39.1%
44.2%
53.4%
41.5%
37.7%
33.9%
38.7%
6.8%
6.7%
5.5%
5.2%
4.8%
4.2%
4.0%
CSUDH CSU-Dominguez Hills
Sonoma State
27.6%
54.9%
28.6%
55.7%
25.0%
53.1%
3.6%
2.6%
CSU Maritime Academy
57.9%
60.0%
57.5%
2.5%
CSU-Monterey Bay
SFSU
36.8%
47.3%
37.0%
46.3%
36.5%
49.0%
0.5%
-2.7%
Peer
Peer
Peer
Highlights: Gender
At most institutions the 6-year
graduation rate of female
students is higher than their
male counterparts.
At CSUDH the difference
between the overall graduation
rate of female and male
students is relatively less
pronounced as compared to
our peers.
19
CSUDH 2006 IPEDS Cohort 6-Year Graduation Rate
by Race and Gender (Source: College Results On-line)
IPEDS Cohort
2006 Grad Rate
All Students
Sort ↓
Female
Male
GAP (Female -Male)
All Students
27.6%
28.6%
25.0%
3.6%
URM
27.1%
29.0%
22.0%
7.0%
Non-URM
36.8%
32.2%
46.4%
-14.2%
Black
21.6%
24.9%
10.7%
14.2%
Latina
31.1%
32.2%
28.7%
3.5%
Nat Am
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Pac Isl
8.3%
8.3%
N/A
N/A
Asian
28.3%
24.2%
38.5%
-14.3%
White
46.3%
42.3%
53.3%
-11.0%
Highlights: Differences in
Graduation Rate by Gender and
Races
At CSUDH differences in graduation
rate vary for male and female
students of different ethnicities.
Male students who are not
underrepresented minorities
outperform their female
counterpart in their 6-year
graduation rate.
Counter to conventional views, the
CSUDH Asian female students
perform at much lower rates than
Asian male students.
20
CSUDH Campus Profile for All Students by Gender: Fall 2013
Men
N
Undergraduate
Graduate/Post-Baccalaureate
Women
%
N
Total
%
N
4,230
35.7
7,630
64.3
11,860
571
25.4
1,676
74.6
2,247
Highlights: Gender
Female students represent 66%
of the CSUDH student body.
Subtotal
High School Students
Total
4,801
34
9,306
66
14,107
563
14,670
21
CSU 2006 IPEDS Cohort 6-Year Graduation Rate
by % of Pell Grant Recipients (Source: College Results On-line)
Peer
Institution Student Characteristics
California Polytechnic State University-San
Luis Obispo
California Maritime Academy
Sonoma State University
San Diego State University
California State University-Chico
California State University-Fullerton
California State University-Channel Islands
San Jose State University
California State University-San Marcos
California State Polytechnic UniversityPomona
San Francisco State University
Humboldt State University
California State University-Long Beach
California State University-Monterey Bay
California State University-Sacramento
Peer
California State University-East Bay
California State University-Northridge
California State University-Stanislaus
California State University-Fresno
Peer
California State University-San Bernardino
Peer
California State University-Bakersfield
CSUDH
California State University-Dominguez Hills
Peer
California State University-Los Angeles
IPEDS Cohort 2006 6-Year
Grad Rate
Sort ↓
% Pell Recipients Among
Freshmen
72.2%
57.9%
54.9%
66.0%
57.2%
51.2%
51.1%
46.9%
44.6%
14%
25%
27%
31%
37%
40%
41%
42%
42%
50.8%
47.3%
40.5%
56.9%
36.8%
41.4%
41.0%
48.0%
48.7%
48.1%
43.5%
38.6%
27.6%
43%
44%
44%
48%
49%
54%
55%
59%
60%
61%
66%
67%
75%
36.5%
76%
Highlight: Financial Need
CSUDH students
demonstrate strong
financial need as
evidenced by 75% of the
freshmen qualifying for
Pell Grants.
22
CSU 2006 IPEDS Cohort 6-Year Graduation Rate
by Federal Loan 3-Year Default Rate (Source: College Results On-line)
Sort ↓
Peer Institution Cost and Financial Aid
California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo
California State University-San Marcos
California State Polytechnic University-Pomona
San Diego State University
California State University-Long Beach
San Jose State University
Sonoma State University
California State University-Chico
Peer
California State University-Los Angeles
California State University-Fullerton
San Francisco State University
California State University-Fresno
California State University-Sacramento
California State University-Monterey Bay
California State University-Northridge
California State University-Stanislaus
California Maritime Academy
CSUDH
California State University-Dominguez Hills
California State University-Channel Islands
Peer
California State University-East Bay
Peer
California State University-San Bernardino
Peer
California State University-Bakersfield
Humboldt State University
IPEDS Cohort 2006 6Year Grad Rate
Federal Loan 3-Year
Default Rate
72.2%
44.6%
50.8%
66.0%
56.9%
46.9%
54.9%
57.2%
36.5%
51.2%
47.3%
48.1%
41.4%
36.8%
48.0%
48.7%
57.9%
27.6%
51.1%
41.0%
43.5%
38.6%
40.5%
3.8%
4.3%
5.3%
5.9%
6.0%
6.0%
6.8%
7.1%
7.6%
7.6%
7.6%
8.0%
8.6%
8.6%
8.7%
8.9%
9.1%
9.2%
9.8%
10.2%
10.4%
10.7%
10.8%
Highlight: Federal
Loan 3-Year Default
Rate
Student loan default
rates are an indicator
of economic burden
and CSUDH students
have higher levels of
financial stress than
other students
attending school in
the CSU system.
23
CSUDH Campus Profile by % of Part-Time Students: Fall 2013
Full-Time
Part-Time
Total
Undergraduate
N
8,562
%
72.2
N
3,298
%
27.8
N
11,860
Graduate/Post-Baccalaureate
1,048
46.6
1,199
53.4
2,247
Subtotal
9,610
68.1
4,497
31.9
14,107
High School Students
Total
563
14,670
Highlight: Campus
Profile by Part-Time
Status
In Fall 2013 CSUDH
undergraduate
students have a parttime rate of 27.8%.
24
CSU 2006 IPEDS Cohort 6-Year Graduation Rate
by % of Part-time Students (Source: College Results On-line)
Sort ↓
Peer
Institution Student Characteristics
Peer
Peer
Peer
Peer
CSUDH
California Maritime Academy
California Polytechnic State University-San
Luis Obispo
California State University-Monterey Bay
California State University-Chico
Humboldt State University
Sonoma State University
California State University-Bakersfield
California State University-San Bernardino
San Diego State University
California State Polytechnic UniversityPomona
California State University-East Bay
California State University-Fresno
San Francisco State University
California State University-Long Beach
California State University-Los Angeles
California State University-Channel Islands
California State University-Sacramento
California State University-Stanislaus
San Jose State University
California State University-Northridge
California State University-Fullerton
California State University-San Marcos
California State University-Dominguez Hills
IPEDS Cohort 2006 6-Year Grad
Rate
% Part-Time
57.9%
2.9%
72.2%
36.8%
57.2%
40.5%
54.9%
38.6%
43.5%
66.0%
3.7%
7.0%
7.7%
8.0%
9.5%
11.6%
12.3%
13.0%
50.8%
41.0%
48.1%
47.3%
56.9%
36.5%
51.1%
41.4%
48.7%
46.9%
48.0%
51.2%
44.6%
27.6%
13.3%
13.5%
13.5%
16.0%
16.1%
17.0%
17.4%
17.5%
19.1%
19.3%
20.2%
20.9%
22.9%
32.7%
Highlight: Student
Part-Time Status
In the 2006 IPEDS
cohort CSUDH
freshmen have the
distinction of having
the highest part-time
rate in the entire
system.
25
CSU 2006 IPEDS Cohort 6-Year Graduation Rate
by % Students of Age 25 and Over (Source: College Results On-line)
Sort ↓
Peer
Institution Student Characteristics
Peer
Peer
Peer
Peer
CSUDH
IPEDS Cohort 2006 6-Year Grad
Rate
% Age 25+
California Polytechnic State University-San Luis
Obispo
72.2%
3.5%
Sonoma State University
54.9%
12.7%
California State University-Chico
57.2%
13.3%
San Diego State University
66.0%
16.3%
California State University-Monterey Bay
36.8%
16.9%
California State Polytechnic University-Pomona
50.8%
17.0%
California State University-Long Beach
56.9%
17.3%
California State University-Fresno
48.1%
17.4%
Humboldt State University
40.5%
17.9%
California Maritime Academy
57.9%
19.5%
California State University-Northridge
48.0%
20.2%
California State University-Fullerton
51.2%
20.4%
San Jose State University
46.9%
21.0%
California State University-Channel Islands
51.1%
21.1%
San Francisco State University
47.3%
21.4%
California State University-San Marcos
44.6%
21.9%
California State University-Stanislaus
48.7%
22.9%
California State University-San Bernardino
43.5%
23.5%
California State University-Bakersfield
38.6%
25.0%
California State University-Sacramento
41.4%
25.0%
California State University-Los Angeles
36.5%
29.1%
California State University-East Bay
41.0%
32.9%
California State University-Dominguez Hills
27.6%
41.2%
Highlights: Age 25+
The non-traditional
character of CSUDH
freshmen is further
confirmed by the fact
that 41% of them are
over the age of 25
years.
This statistic for
proportion of
freshmen over age 25
is also the highest in
the CSUDH system.
Note: In Fall 2013 the
average age of all
CSUDH
undergraduate
students was 25.5
years.
26
CSU 2006 IPEDS Cohort 6-Year Graduation Rate
by Average High School GPA (Source: College Results On-line)
Peer Institution Admissions
Peer
California State University-Bakersfield
California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo
San Diego State University
California State University-Long Beach
California State University-Fullerton
California State University-Fresno
California State Polytechnic University-Pomona
San Jose State University
California State University-Stanislaus
California State University-Sacramento
Peer
California State University-San Bernardino
California State University-Chico
California State University-Channel Islands
California State University-Monterey Bay
Sonoma State University
California State University-San Marcos
California State University-Northridge
San Francisco State University
Humboldt State University
Peer
California State University-Los Angeles
California Maritime Academy
CSUDH
Peer
California State University-Dominguez Hills
California State University-East Bay
IPEDS Cohort 2006 6Year Grad Rate
Sort ↓
Average High School
GPA Among College
Freshmen
38.6%
72.2%
66.0%
56.9%
51.2%
48.1%
50.8%
46.9%
48.7%
41.4%
43.5%
57.2%
51.1%
36.8%
54.9%
44.6%
48.0%
47.3%
40.5%
36.5%
57.9%
27.6%
41.0%
N/A
3.84
3.62
3.43
3.37
3.33
3.32
3.28
3.25
3.23
3.22
3.22
3.22
3.19
3.17
3.17
3.15
3.15
3.13
3.11
3.10
3.05
3.00
Highlight: Average
High School GPA
CSUDH freshmen
have the second
lowest average high
school GPA of 3.05 in
the system.
27
CSU 2006 IPEDS Cohort 6-Year Graduation Rate
by Median SAT (Source: College Results On-line)
Peer Institution Admissions
California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo
San Diego State University
California State Polytechnic University-Pomona
California Maritime Academy
California State University-Chico
San Jose State University
Humboldt State University
California State University-Long Beach
Sonoma State University
San Francisco State University
California State University-Fullerton
California State University-Channel Islands
California State University-San Marcos
California State University-Monterey Bay
California State University-Sacramento
California State University-Fresno
California State University-Northridge
Peer
California State University-Bakersfield
California State University-Stanislaus
Peer
Peer
Peer
CSUDH
California State University-East Bay
California State University-San Bernardino
California State University-Los Angeles
California State University-Dominguez Hills
Sort ↓
IPEDS Cohort 2006 6- Estimated Median SAT /
Year Grad Rate
ACT
72.2%
66.0%
50.8%
57.9%
57.2%
46.9%
40.5%
56.9%
54.9%
47.3%
51.2%
51.1%
44.6%
36.8%
41.4%
48.1%
48.0%
38.6%
48.7%
41.0%
43.5%
36.5%
27.6%
1,220
1,085
1,080
1,070
1,035
1,030
1,030
1,025
1,020
1,010
1,000
975
975
960
955
940
930
925
925
920
910
885
845
Highlight: Median SAT
CSUDH freshmen have
the lowest SAT scores
in the system.
Lack of preparation for
a university curriculum
adds to the challenges
faced by students in
completing their
degree programs.
28
CSU 2006 IPEDS Cohort 6-Year Graduation Rate
by Percent of Full-time Faculty
(Source: College Results On-line)
2012 6-Year Grad Rate
Percent Full-Time
Faculty
California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo
72.2%
68.5%
California Maritime Academy
57.9%
67.6%
California State University-Stanislaus
48.7%
62.7%
California State University-Bakersfield
38.6%
61.8%
California State University-Fresno
48.1%
58.2%
San Diego State University
66.0%
57.8%
California State University-Chico
57.2%
55.2%
California State University-San Bernardino
43.5%
54.8%
California State University-Sacramento
41.4%
54.1%
Sonoma State University
54.9%
52.8%
San Francisco State University
47.3%
52.5%
Humboldt State University
40.5%
52.3%
California State University-Los Angeles
36.5%
50.9%
California State University-Long Beach
56.9%
50.3%
California State Polytechnic University-Pomona
50.8%
50.3%
California State University-Monterey Bay
36.8%
49.8%
California State University-San Marcos
44.6%
49.5%
California State University-Channel Islands
51.1%
49.3%
California State University-Fullerton
51.2%
48.0%
California State University-Northridge
48.0%
46.7%
California State University-East Bay
41.0%
46.1%
San Jose State University
46.9%
40.1%
California State University-Dominguez Hills
27.6%
39.4%
Peer Institution Finance and Faculty
Peer
Peer
Peer
Peer
CSUDH
Sort ↓
Highlight: Percent
Full-time Faculty
CSUDH’s need for
additional faculty
resources is the
greatest among all
other system schools.
The percent of fulltime faculty on
campus is only 39.4%.
29
CSU 2006 IPEDS Cohort 6-Year Graduation Rate
by Full-time Undergraduate Student to Faculty Ratio
(Source: College Results On-line)
Peer Institution Finance and Faculty
California Maritime Academy
California State University-Stanislaus
California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo
California State University-Channel Islands
Peer
California State University-Los Angeles
California State University-Long Beach
California State University-San Marcos
Humboldt State University
California State University-Fresno
Peer
California State University-Bakersfield
San Diego State University
San Francisco State University
Sonoma State University
California State University-Fullerton
California State University-Chico
San Jose State University
California State University-Monterey Bay
CSUDH
California State University-Dominguez Hills
California State University-Sacramento
Peer
California State University-East Bay
California State University-Northridge
Peer
California State University-San Bernardino
California State Polytechnic University-Pomona
Sort ↓
2012 6-Year Grad Rate
Full-Time Undergrad
Student to Faculty
Ratio
57.9%
48.7%
72.2%
51.1%
36.5%
56.9%
44.6%
40.5%
48.1%
38.6%
66.0%
47.3%
54.9%
51.2%
57.2%
46.9%
36.8%
27.6%
41.4%
41.0%
48.0%
43.5%
50.8%
17
23
23
25
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
27
27
28
28
28
29
29
29
30
30
30
33
Highlight: Full-time
Undergraduate
Student to Faculty
Ratio
CSUDH ranks in the
bottom quartile for
this metric in the
system.
30
CSU 2006 IPEDS Cohort 6-Year Graduation Rate
by Total Educational and General Expenditures (Source: College Results On-line)
Peer Institution Finance and Faculty
California Maritime Academy
California State University-Channel Islands
California State University-Monterey Bay
Humboldt State University
California State University-San Marcos
Peer
California State University-East Bay
Sonoma State University
San Francisco State University
Peer
California State University-Bakersfield
Peer
California State University-San Bernardino
San Diego State University
California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo
California State University-Stanislaus
CSUDH
California State University-Dominguez Hills
San Jose State University
California State University-Fresno
Peer
California State University-Los Angeles
California State University-Chico
California State University-Sacramento
California State University-Fullerton
California State University-Northridge
California State University-Long Beach
California State Polytechnic University-Pomona
Sort ↓
Educational & General
Expenditures / Total
2012 6-Year Grad Rate
FTE
57.9%
51.1%
36.8%
40.5%
44.6%
41.0%
54.9%
47.3%
38.6%
43.5%
66.0%
72.2%
48.7%
27.6%
46.9%
48.1%
36.5%
57.2%
41.4%
51.2%
48.0%
56.9%
50.8%
$37,308
$22,435
$19,301
$17,654
$16,669
$16,062
$15,337
$15,287
$15,133
$15,121
$15,119
$14,869
$14,560
$14,316
$13,739
$13,227
$13,110
$12,996
$12,944
$12,884
$12,869
$12,807
$12,710
Highlight: Expenditure
per Student FTE
CSUDH ranks 14th in
the system for total
E&G expenditures per
student.
31
Summary: Retention and Graduation Rates
IPEDS 6-Year Graduation Rates - Past, Present and Future
Past
Present
Future
Aspirational
Target
Low graduation rates ranging from 27% to 37% for Fall 2008 and prior cohorts
Cohorts after Fall 2008 yield markedly higher return rates that are at an all time high in 22 years
Regression analysis of 10-year return rates project 6-year graduation to reach 39% for the 2010 cohort
The N and % of Special Admits and their need for remediation is declining among freshmen (Fall 2009-13)
Reaching a stretch goal of 60% 6-year graduation rate by 2020
Strengths
CSU System Ranking
Diversity: % Underrepresented Minority Enrollment
3rd Highest
Access: % of Pell Recipients
Challenges
Overall Graduation Rate
URM Graduation Rate
Black and Asian Student Graduation Rate
Difference in Graduation Rate by Gender
Difference in Graduation Rate within Ethnicities by Gender
Proportion Part-Time Students
Proportion of Students Age 25+
Student Preparation - Average High School GPA
Student Preparation - Estimated Median SAT/ACT
Federal Loan 3-Year Default Rate
Total E & G Expenditures per Student FTE
Percent of Full-Time Faculty
Full-Time Undergrad Student Faculty Ratio
2nd Highest
CSU System Ranking
Lowest
Low
Lowest
Little Difference
Asian and Non-URM Males Do Better
Highest
Highest
2nd Lowest
Lowest
Bottom Quartile
Middle
Lowest
High
32
IPEDS Definitions (Source: College Results On-line)
GRADUATION RATE DATA
The institutional graduation-rate data presented in College Results Online (CRO) is the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) data.
Federal Graduation Rate Definition (IPEDS)The GRS graduation rates displayed on CRO are based on the percentage of first-time, full-time, bachelor’s or
equivalent degree-seeking freshmen who earn a bachelor’s or equivalent degree from the institution where they originally enrolled.
CRO's Collection of Graduation Rate Data Students who began in Fall 2006 are considered to have successfully completed their degree within six years if they
earned the degree on or before August 31, 2012.
DATA DEFINITIONS AND SOURCES
Graduation Rates by Race OR Gender
Graduation Rates for Underrepresented Minority Students: This refers to the 6-year graduation rate for first-time, full-time, bachelor’s or equivalent degreeseeking Black, Latino, or Native American undergraduates who enrolled in Fall 2006 and successfully completed their degree within six years.
Graduation Rates for Non-Underrepresented Minority (Non-URM) Students: This refers to the 6-year graduation rate for first-time, full-time, bachelor’s or
equivalent degree-seeking White or Asian freshmen who enrolled in Fall 2006 and successfully completed their degree within six years.
Student Characteristics
Size (Full-Time Equivalent Undergraduates): Estimated as the number of full-time undergraduates plus the number of part-time undergraduates divided by three.
Full-time equivalent undergraduates will be abbreviated as FTE in the remainder of this document. (IPEDS)
Percentage of Undergraduates Receiving Pell Grants: Number of undergraduate students who received Pell Grants divided by the financial aid cohort (see
definition for Financial Aid Cohort below). This variable is available starting with the 2007-08 Financial Aid cohort (IPEDS).
Percent Underrepresented Minority (URM): The percent of FTE undergraduates who are Black, Latino, or Native American. As mentioned in the New
Race/Ethnicity Categories section, although IPEDS adopted new reporting categories (disaggregating data for Asians and Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific
Islander, and providing data for students of Two or More Races) for the 2011-12 collection year, 2012 graduation rates are based on the 2006 freshman cohort.
Since institutional reporting was not yet mandatory at that previous point in time, institutional reports of graduation rates for Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific
Islander and Two or More Races are unreliable. For this reason, the calculations for percent URM and non-URM do not yet include these new categories. (IPEDS)
Percent Black, Latino, etc.: The percent of FTE undergraduates who belong to different categories of race/ethnicity. (IPEDS)
Percent Nonresident Alien: The percent of FTE undergraduates who are Nonresident Aliens. Nonresident aliens are defined as people who are not citizens or
nationals of the U.S. and who are in this country on a visa or temporary basis. (IPEDS)
Percent Part-Time: The number of part-time undergraduates divided by the total number of undergraduates. Part-time undergraduates are defined as students
enrolled for less than 12 semester or quarter credits or less than 24 contact hours a week each term. (IPEDS)
Percent 25 and Over: The number of undergraduates age 25 or older divided by the total number of undergraduates. Because collection of the age variable is only
mandatory in fall of every odd year, odd year’s data was substituted for every even year’s data for this variable. (IPEDS)
Admissions
Average High School GPA Among College Freshmen: This variable is provided by Peterson's Databases, and represents the average high school grade point
average, on a 4.0 scale, for degree-seeking, first-time, first-year (freshman) undergraduate students. No GPA data is shown if less than 50% of students submitted
high school GPA data.
Estimated Median SAT / ACT: Higher education institutions do not report median aggregate SAT or ACT data to IPEDS. For the SAT, they report the 25th and 75th
percentile score of students submitting scores for the critical reading, mathematics, and writing sections. For the ACT, they report the 25th and 75th percentile
scores for the English, math, and composite scores.
33
IPEDS Definitions (continued)
The median composite ACT score is estimated by averaging the 25th percentile and 75th percentile composite ACT scores. The median combined SAT score is
estimated by adding the average of the 25th and 75th percentile critical reading score to the average of the 25th and 75th percentile math score.
Cost and Financial Aid
Percentage of Freshman Receiving Pell Grants: Percentage of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students who received Pell
Grants. This variable is available starting with the 2008-09 Financial Aid cohort (IPEDS). For all previous years, Percent Federal Grant Aid (see definition below)
was substituted for this variable.
Percent Federal Grant Aid: Percent of first-time, full-time degree-seeking students receiving federal grant aid (Title IV Pell Grants plus Supplemental
Educational Opportunity Grants). Also includes need-based and merit-based educational assistance funds and training vouchers provided from other federal
agencies and/or federally-sponsored educational benefits programs, including the Veteran's Administration, Department of Labor, and other federal agencies.
(Used for reporting on the Student Financial Aid component) (IPEDS)
Percent of Undergraduates Receiving Pell Grants: Number of undergraduate students who received Pell Grants divided by the financial aid cohort
Financial Aid Cohort: The number of undergraduate students enrolled at an institution as of October 15 (or the institution’s official fall reporting date) for
institutions with standard academic terms.
Finance and Faculty
The financial data shown on CRO is for the 2010-2011 academic year. The IPEDS reporting system requires universities to report expenditures broken down into
a number of categories and sub-categories.
Instructional Expenditures / FTE: “Instructional expenses” is a discrete reporting category. It includes expenditures for the colleges, schools, departments, and
other instructional divisions of the institution and expenses for departmental research and public service that are not separately budgeted. It also includes
general academic instruction, occupational and vocational instruction, community education, preparatory and adult basic education, and regular, special, and
extension sessions. It includes expenses for both credit and non-credit activities. It excludes expenses for academic administration where the primary function
is administration (e.g., academic deans). Information technology expenses related to instructional activities if the institution separately budgets and expenses
information technology resources are included (otherwise these expenses are included in “academic support”). (IPEDS)
Educational and General Expenditures / FTE: This is a broader category, which includes the instructional expenditures listed above, plus expenditures for
research, public service, academic support, student services, institutional support, plant operation & maintenance, and scholarships. This variable is also only
available for public and not-for-profit institutions. (IPEDS)
In the 2011-2012 dataset, substitutions were made for Parent/Child schools for the Instructional Expenditures/FTE, Educational and General Expenditures/FTE,
and Student and Related Expenditures/FTE variables using the Parent/Child allocation factor (PCF_F) found in the Response Status Section in the Finance
Survey (IPEDS). For example, Rutgers University reports its finance data to IPEDS for the main campus only, but indicates how to allocate the funds between
campuses using the allocation factors. For more information, please also see the Parent/child indicator (PRCH_F) and the Parent/child allocation method
(PCF_M) variables in the IPEDS Finance Survey Response Status Section. For those Parent/Child schools without Allocation Factors in IPEDS (e.g. the University
of Pittsburgh System), the figures for the Main Parent campus was substituted for all the children campuses.
Percent Full-Time Faculty: The number of full-time faculty members as a percent of all faculty members. Because collection of the faculty variable is only
mandatory in fall of every odd year, odd year’s data were substituted for every even year’s data for this variable. (IPEDS)
Full-Time Undergraduates / Full-Time Faculty Ratio: The number of full-time undergraduates divided by the number of full-time faculty. (IPEDS)