Reasoning & Problem Solving Lecture 7 Clear Thinking and Clear Writing By David Kelsey Vagueness • A vague statement is one whose meaning is indistinct, imprecise or lacks details. • Degrees: Vagueness isn’t all or nothing. It comes in degrees. – Apartment example Clarifying vagueness • Desirable vagueness: sometimes vagueness is actually desirable. – • Being Romantic Clarify: If we come across a vague statement we can simply try to clarify the lack of detail or indistinct-ness. – Job example Vagueness and Propositions • A vague statement – it is unclear what proposition the sentence asserts at all. – It could be any one of a number of propositions Ambiguous Claims • • • An ambiguous claim is one that is subject to more than one interpretation. Claim x – P1 P2 – Jessica rents her house Semantic Ambiguity • A sentence that is semantically ambiguous is one which contains an ambiguous word or phrase. • For example: – Jessica is cold. • Fixing the ambiguous word Syntactic Ambiguity • A sentence is syntactically ambiguous when it is ambiguous because of its grammar or the way it has been structured or put together. – Susan saw the farmer with binoculars. – You will need a birth certificate or a driver’s license and other photo id. • When you have come across a semantic ambiguity you can simply alter the grammar • Or you might need to re-write the claim altogether. Grouping Ambiguity • Grouping ambiguity: – unclear whether some word in the sentence is referring to a group or an individual. – Secretaries and Physicians – Lawnmowers and dirt bikes Composition and Division • The fallacy of Division: • The fallacy of Composition: – When we think that what is true of a group of things taken collectively is automatically true of the same things taken individually. – When we think that what holds for a group of things individually holds automatically for the entire collective group. – The Giants example: – The Patriots example: Stipulating Definitions • Stipulating definitions: – Terms are used that we don’t fully understand. – A term used is unusual or unfamiliar. – A brand new word – A familiar word is being used in a new way Precising Definitions • Precising definitions: – Used to reduce vagueness or to eliminate ambiguity. – Some examples: • Justice: • Permissible: Definitions: by Example & by synonym • Definition by example: – • We define a term by example when we point to, name or describe one or more examples of something to which the defined term applies. Definition by synonym: – We define a term by synonym when we give another word or phrase that means the same thing as the term being defined. – Bachelors example Analytical Definitions: their form • An Analytical definition is composed of a definiendum and a definiens. – – • The definiendum: The definiens: Form: the form of a definition is this: – X =df _____ • – Which is the definiendum and which is the definiens? For example, • Knowledge =df true belief Necessary and sufficient conditions • We can think of a definition as a set of necessary and sufficient conditions. – • X is a necessary condition of Y if and only if (or iff) we cannot have Y without also having X. – • The definiens is a set of necessary and sufficient conditions for the definiendum. Oxygen and Combustion X is a sufficient condition of Y iff X is all that is needed to get Y. – Being born in the US and citizenship Necessary and Sufficient Conditions #2 • X is both a necessary and sufficient condition of Y iff both – – • 1) we cannot have Y without also having X & 2) X is all that is needed to get Y. Knowledge is JTB Correct Definitions • For a definition to be adequate the definiendum and definiens must be co-extensive. • For the defiendum and definiens of any definition to be co-extensive it must be the case that: – 1) – 2) – What is the extension of a concept? Co-extensiveness: An example • So if your definition of KNOWLEDGE as TRUE BELIEF is correct then: – Everything in the extension of KNOWLEDGE is in the extension of TRUE BELIEF and vice versa. Testing definitions • To determine if a definition is adequate: – – determine if its definiendum and definiens are co-extensive. Is there any item in the extension of one that isn’t in the extension of the other? – Example: Knowledge is true belief • All Knowledge is true belief. • All true belief is knowledge. • Universal generalizations and counterexamples Counterexamples • A counterexample: a case that violates a universal generalization. • If we define knowledge as true belief we just need one counterexample to show this definition inadequate. – – We need to find a case of knowledge that isn’t what? Or a case of true belief that isn’t what? – A counterexample: • The Belief Game: Counterexamples #2 • Love: Say I define Love as a deep seated feeling composed of compassion & care which one can have for another human being. – • Can anyone find a counterexample to this definition? We are looking for either: – – a case of love that isn’t ____________ a case of having this feeling for another human which isn’t ______________ – Any thoughts?