Data preparation and memos and other documents 1 Transcription Kvale warns us to “beware of transcripts”. Dangers = superficial coding decontextualization missing what came before and after the respondent’s account missing what the larger conversation was about Transcription is a change of medium 2 Who should do it? Self Audio typist Dictation/speech recognition software 3 Self Tedious but good because it begins data analysis Careful reading of whole transcript produces new ideas etc. May have no choice if text in a language few others can understand. 4 Can use 3 stage process Level 1: Log the tape in a fashion analogous to creating a table of contents. Level 2: Make a rough transcription. Need to be a good typist ignore spelling, punctuation & fine details NEVER REWIND. 2-3 hours per hour of tape. generally only readable by typist or someone intimately familiar with the material, Level 3: Full and accurate transcription. 5 Audio typist Quicker, but costs money, and typists make mistakes and you need to check for these. See handout. Helps if typist knows something about the context of the interviews Typists can be vulnerable too. Checking can be used as an opportunity to begin analysis. 6 Dictation/speech recognition software Still not good enough to transcribe voice from tape or digital recording Because needs v. good quality sound AND learns your own accent as you use it. Works best with American accent. Use continuous speech software (IBM Via Voice or Dragon Dictate) Can listen to tape and then dictate to computer. Still at best only 95% accurate. 7 Checking with participants. What if they disagree with transcript? Two options: Treat the new statements as new data try to find why interviewee changed opinion: 1. embarrassment over what was said now that it is frozen on tape; 2. intervening events which have altered the situation; 3. a genuine change in opinion; 4. pressure from peers or authority figures Treat transition in opinion as interesting data itself. Interviewee may want previous statement erased or not used. Interviewees’ right. 8 Transcription errors Sources Poor quality recording A good microphone helps. E.g. a battery powered lapel microphone. Poor quality transcribing machine. Sometimes a hi-fi cassette player is better than a transcribing machine, even though it does not have the auto-rewind facility. Transcriber thinks they hear the phrase but gets it wrong See handout. 9 Format of transcript Names. Use capitals for speakers MARY C MARY I: or “IV:” or “INT 10 Anonymisation Names and contextual names (places etc) Keep original with real names, but keep secure. Publish only anonymised versions 11 Prepare text Check for accuracy. Use […] for missing text Use [bribery?] for words you are not sure about. Print with wide margins (for next stage – coding) 12 Structure Structured interviews Section format. e.g. with same questions Use Q1, Q2 etc. consistently throughout Put in a Heading style for NVivo. Facilitates searching later Use of heading style (Heading 1 etc) in NVivo Allows use of automatic coding Paragraphs Use if coding off-line. ‘On the beach’ coding 13 Levels of transcription People don’t speak in sentences Repeat themselves Hesitate, stutter Use contractions (don’t, coz, etc) Use filler words (like, y’know, er, I mean) Options Just the gist Verbatim Verbatim with dialect Discourse level. 14 Just the gist “90% of my communication is with … the Sales Director. 1% of his communication is with me. I try to be one step ahead, I get things ready, … because he jumps from one … project to another. …This morning we did Essex, this afternoon we did BT, and we haven't even finished Essex yet.”(… indicates omitted speech) 15 Verbatim “I don’t really know. I’ve a feeling that they’re allowed to let their emotions show better. I think bereavement is part of their religion and culture. They tend to be more religious anyway. I’m not from a religious family, so I don’t know that side of it.” 16 Verbatim with dialect “‘s just that – one o’ staff – they wind everybody up, I mean, – cos I asked for some money – out o’ the safe, cos they only keep money in the safe – ’s our money – so I asked for some money and they wouldn’t give it me – an’ I snatched this tenner what was mine.” 17 Conversation analysis Bashir: Did you ever (.) personally assist him with the writing of his book. (0.8) Princess: A lot of people.hhh ((clears throat)) saw the distress that my life was in. (.) And they felt it was a supportive thing to help (0.2) in the way that they did. See handout 18 Document headers = Session summary sheets or cover sheet Pseudonym of person interviewed and other anonymizing reference Date of interview Topic and circumstances of interview Name of interviewer Source of field notes relevant to interview Linked documents (e.g. previous and subsequent interviews Source of document (full reference) Initial ideas for analysis In NVivo can be kept in document properties. 19 Archiving Needs written consent from participants (difficult if not done at the time of research) May need copyright permission if used in publications Ensure confidentiality by anonymizing names of people and places (safe for participants if activities illegal or illicit) safe for researcher (e.g. covert operations, paramilitary groups). Alternative is closure of material for a period or restricted access. Need to specify. Also, Field notes, documentation etc. needed to give secondary researchers background information. E S R C Qualitative Data Archival Resource Centre (Qualidata) http://www.qualidata.essex.ac.uk/ 20 Data and Meta-data Field notes. Keeps a record of what happened during an observation, interview etc. Can include detailed notes taken during an interview. 21 Field notes Keeps a record of what happened during an observation, interview etc. Can include detailed notes taken during an interview. Usually open-ended, loose, unruly and messy. Interpretations of the world. To write fieldnotes you have to be selective. Include inscription and transcription. • Inscriptions = descriptions of events and activities • Transcriptions = records of informants’ own words and dialogues. 22 Field notes 2 Descriptions of what people said and did, but not simply a recording of the facts. Emerson et al. - “descriptive writing embodies and reflects particular purposes and commitments, and it also involves active processes of interpretation and sense-making”. Accumulates into a corpus. Forms basis for qualitative analysis. 23 Field notes 3 Write up as soon as possible (before detail is forgotten). Need to distinguish: Recording what happened, i.e. describing things that went on Recording your own actions, questions and reflections on what went on. 24 Case Summary Summary or Précis of the case Identify what is essential to the case Identify what is special/peculiar Get familiar with issues, themes, ideas Recursive abstraction datasets are summarized, summaries are further summarized, etc. Produces a more compact summary But, poor initial summary may lead to poor recursive summary. Need to document steps 25 Memos Theorizing and commenting about codes as you go along Idea from Grounded Theory Notes to yourself Glazer’s classic definition “… the theorizing write-up of ideas about codes and their relationships as they strike the analyst while coding… it can be a sentence, a paragraph or a few pages… it exhausts the analyst’s momentary ideation based on data with perhaps a little conceptual elaboration.” Glazer, B (1978)Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory Mill Valley CA: Sociology Press. 26 Typical uses for memos A new idea for a code “Place holding” - just a quick hunch Integrative discussion (e.g. of previous reflective remarks As dialogue amongst researchers To question quality of data. To question original analytic framework. What is puzzling or surprising about a case As alternative hypotheses to another memo If you have no clear idea but are struggling to find one. To raise a general theme or metaphor. 27 Memos 2 Memos should be dated and linked to places in field notes, case analysis discussion, case summaries, codes, documents etc. Write in margin or separate sheet, linked to data. Computers a great help with linking See handout 28 Categorising memos Organise into four categories. Mark each type using letters in brackets. Observation notes (ON): As concrete and detailed as possible about what you saw, heard, felt, tasted etc. Methodological notes (MN): Notes to yourself about how to collect ‘data,’ – who to talk to, what to wear, when to phone, and so on. Theoretical notes (TN): Hunches, hypotheses, connections, alternative interpretations, critiques of what you are doing/ thinking/ seeing. Personal notes (PN): These are your feelings about the research, who you are talking to, your doubts, anxieties and pleasures. 29 Guidelines for memos 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Always give priority to writing memos, while the flash of insight remains. Jot down memo as the idea occurs Begin when first field data comes in and continue till report is written. Keep separate from data Indicate what’s just a hunch Modify memos during analysis (it’s not the data) Keep list of codes handy to help Consider combining codes if memos on them look similar Keep people/cases out of memos - they’re about the codes/concepts/ideas – ?? Make sure memos are not just examples, they are about ideas/concepts. – ?? (Mix of Dey, Miles and Huberman, Glaser and Stauss and Corbin.) 30 Contact summary sheet After a field contact there is a need to remember the main concepts, themes, issues and questions raised. Review field notes and write comments Keep to a single sheet of paper Do as soon as field notes written up but before any coding is completed. Not too soon because can bias thinking. 31 Contact summary sheet 2 Can be used for: Guide to next contact To suggest revised codes, To help co-ordinate multiple researchers Re-orientation before next visit As data for further analysis. 32 Contact summary sheet 3 Typical contents 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Contact type (visit/phone etc) Site Date of contact Today’s date Author Main issues or themes that struck you on this contact? Summary of information obtained (or not) for target questions Any other salient, interesting, illuminating, important points New or remaining target questions for next contact with this site 33