Katy grand rounds april 14

advertisement
Evaluation of Stillbirth
Katy Kemnetz, PGY2
Evaluation of stillbirth
OBJECTIVES
Objectives
The participant will be able to:
 Identify the conditions that have been best
demonstrated to cause stillbirth
 Evaluate a stillbirth using the most effective
workup
 Accurately formulate an etiology for a stillbirth,
when possible
 Employ the recmomended hospital policies for
management of stillbirth
Outline
Definitions
 Causes of stillbirth
 Workup of stillbirth
 Other considerations
 Conclusions

Evaluation of Stillbirth
Definitions
Definitions
Spontaneous abortion


Miscarriage
<20 weeks gestation or <500g
Intrauterine fetal demise


“Stillbirth”
>20 weeks gestation or >350g—state
dependent
◦ 350g is 50%ile for 20 weeks gestation
◦ Illinois: >20 weeks gestation


“Delivery of a fetus showing no signs of
life as indicated by the absence of
breathing, heart beats, pulsation of
the umbilical cord, or definite
movements of voluntary muscles”
Does not include terminations of
pregnancy or IOL for previable PPROM
Evaluation of stillbirth
Causes
Causes of stillbirth
>30 classification systems exist
 Important to distinguish between

◦ Underlying cause of death
◦ Mechanism of death
◦ Risk factors
The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
CLASSIFICATION
OF STILLBIRTH
Classification of Stillbirth
Eunice Kennedy Shriver workshop 2007
 National Institute of Child Health and Human
Development
 “An optimal classification system would identify
the pathophysiological entity initiating the
chain of events that irreversibly lead to death”

Criteria for “cause”
Epidemiologic data demonstrate an excess of stillbirth
associated with that condition
 Biologic plausibility that the condition causes stillbirth
 Either rarely seen in association with live births or, when
seen in live births, results in a significant increase in
neonatal death
 A dose-response relationship exists

◦ The greater the “dose” of the condition, the greater the risk of
fetal death


Associated with evidence of fetal compromise
The stillbirth likely would not have occurred if that
condition had not been present
Causes of stillbirth
Reddy, UM et al. “Stillbirth Classification—Developing an International
Consensus for Research.” Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol 114, No 4,
October 2009.
Causes of stillbirth—NICHHD workshop consensus
INFECTIONS
Infection
Associated with 10-20% of stillbirths in
developed countries
 Higher association with preterm birth
 Sometimes difficult to prove causality

Infection
Ascending infectionamniotic fluid or
fetusfetal pneumonitis
 Hematogenous spreadvillitis

Kumar: Robbins pathologic basis
of disease, 8th edition. 2009
Mechanism of fetal death
Severe maternal illness
 Placental infection that
prevents oxygen/
nutrients from crossing to
the fetus
 Fetal infection that
causes a lethal
congenital deformity

Fetal infection that
damages a vital organ
 Precipitation of preterm
labor, with intrapartum
fetal death

Infections must be proven

Signs of infection in the fetus
◦ Evidence on autopsy of extensive organ involvement
Positive fetal cultures
 Positive maternal cultures plus chorioamnionitis/
funisitis

Kumar: Robbins pathologic basis of disease, 8th edition. 2009
Causes of IUFD: Spirochetes
Organism
Comment
Treponema palladium
Maternal disease
Severe
Syphilis
placental
dysfunction
Borrelia burgdorferi
Lyme disease
Tick borne; not a common
cause of stillbirth
Borrelia recurrentis
Relapsing fever
Tick borne; common in the
Western US; rare cause of
stillbirth
Borrelia duttonii
Relapsing fever
Tick borne; sub-Saharan
Africa; important cause of
stillbirth
Leptospira interrogans
Leptospirosis
Uncommon
Major cause of stillbirth
when maternal prevalence
is high
Protozoa
Organism
Maternal disease
Comment
Trypanosoma brucei
Trypanasomiasis
Tsetse fly
Trypanosoma cruzi
Chagas disease
Kissing bug
Plasmodium falciparum
Malaria
Common in endemic areas
Plasmodium vivax
Malaria
Toxoplosmosis gondii
Toxoplasmosis
Severe
placental
dysfunction
Mosquitoes
Rare
Viruses
Organism
Maternal disease
Comment
Parvovirus B19
Erythema infectiosum
Likely the most common
viral etiologic agent
Coxsackie A and B
Various
May be important
Echovirus
Various
Importance unknown
Enterovirus
Various
Importance unknown
Hepatits E virus
Fulminant hepatic failure
Especially in endemic areas
Poliovirus
Polio
Historic cause
Varicella zoster
Causes lethal
Rubella
fetal anomalies
Mumps
Chickenpox
Rare cause
German measles
Rare in developed countries
Parotitis
Rare in developed countries
Rubeola
Measles
Rare in developed countries
Cytomegalovirus
Asymptomatic
Case reports
HIV
AIDS
Not likely causative
Influenza
Respiratory tract infection
Severe maternal illness
Bacteria
Organism
Maternal disease
Comment
Asymptomatic
Probably the most common
organism assoc with stillbirth
Asymptomatic
Common cause of stillbirth
Klebsiella
Asymptomatic
Common cause of stillbirth
Enterococcus
Asymptomatic
Ureaplasma, mycoplasma
Asymptomatic
E. Coli
GBS
Damage to
vital organs
(brain, heart)
Chlamydia trachomatis
Severe
placental
Listeriosis
dysfunction
Pelvic infection
Neisseria gonorrhoeae
Pelvic infection
Suggested cause—case
reports
Candida albicans
Thrush; vaginitis
Confirmed in case reports
Listeria monocytogenes
Transmitted transplacentally
Suggested cause—case
reports
Goldenberg RL, Thompson C. The infectious origins of stillbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol
2003;189:861–73
Causes of stillbirth—NICHHD workshop consensus
MATERNAL MEDICAL CONDITIONS
Hypertensive disorders
Condition
Estimated stillbirth rate per 1000 births in
patients with the condition
All pregnancies
6-7
Chronic hypertension
5-25
Superimposed preeclampsia
52
Gestational hypertension and mild
preeclampsia
9
Severe preeclampsia
21
Eclampsia
18-48
HELLP syndrome
51
Simpson, LL. Maternal medical disease: Risk of
Antepartum Fetal Death. Semin Perinatol, 2002, 26, 47.
Hypertensive disorders
Mechanism of fetal demise:

To consider cause of death:
Placental insufficiency

◦ IUGR

◦ Abruption
If it progresses to eclampsia
If it is associated with placental
abruption or fetal growth
restriction
Diabetes
Condition
Estimated stillbirth rate per 1000 births in
patients with the condition
All pregnancies
6-7
Gestational diabetes
5-10
Type 1 diabetes
6-10
Type 2 diabetes
35
Simpson, LL. Maternal medical disease: Risk of
Antepartum Fetal Death. Semin Perinatol, 2002, 26, 47.
Diabetes
Mechanism of fetal demise:




To consider cause of death:
Congenital abnormality
Placental dysfunction
Obstructed labor and
intrapartum death
Macrosomia

◦ Fetal hyperglycemiafetal insulin
productionexcessive fetal
growthmetabolic acidosis




Signs of intrauterine or
intrapartum asphyxia
LGA fetus
SGA fetus
Severe malformation
Placenta demonstrates
characteristic histologic findings
◦ Large edematous villi
◦ Increased prominence of
cytotrophoblasts
Thyroid/renal disorders
Condition
Estimated stillbirth rate per 1000 births in
patients with the condition
All pregnancies
6-7
Stable treated hyperthyroidism
0-36
Uncontrolled thyrotoxicosis
100-156
Subclinical hypothyroidism
0-15
Overt hypothyrodism
15-125
SLE
40-150
Mild chronic renal disease
15
Moderate and severe chronic renal disease
32-200
Cholestasis of pregnancy
12-30
Simpson, LL. Maternal medical disease: Risk of
Antepartum Fetal Death. Semin Perinatol, 2002, 26, 47.
Thyroid/renal disorders
Thyroid disorders


Graves disease, where thyroidstimulating hormone receptor
antibody causes fetal toxicosis
Untreated thyroid disorders
Renal disorders

Linear relationship between
maternal creatinine and risk of
fetal demise
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus


Stillbirth rates are higher in the presence of HTN, nephritis, or APL
Circulating auto-antibodies, anti-Ro, anti-La
 Congenital heart block, hydrops
Maternal medical conditions

Risk is a continuum
Reddy, UM et al, 2009
Causes of stillbirth—NICHHD workshop consensus
THROMBOPHILIAS
Thrombophilias
Antiphospholipid syndrome


Inflammation, thrombosis, and
infarction in the placenta
Clear histopathological or
clinical evidence of placental
insufficiency
Inherited thrombophilias
Thrombophilias
should only be
considered
as
the
cause of
 Factor
Leiden
mutation,
Two V
large
prospective
antithrombin
III deficincy,
Thrombophilias
are
cohort
studies
found
no
stillbirth
with:

common
in healthy
association
between
factor
prothrombin
mutation,
•Evidence
ofgene
placental
women
with normal
V Leiden
mutation
andprotein S
protein
C
deficiency,
insufficiency
such
as
fetal
outcomes
pregnancy
loss or placental
deficiency
growth
restriction or infarction
insufficiency
and
Placental
infarction and
•Recurrent fetal loss
thrombosis
Causes of stillbirth—NICHHD workshop consensus
ALLOIMMUNIZATION
Alloimmunization
Red cell alloimmunization
Platelet alloimmunization
Anti-Rhesus D, anti-Rhesus C,
anti-Kell
 Must have a positive indirect
Coombs test
 Antibody titers more than 1:16
(or 1:8 for anti-Kell)
 Evidence of fetal anemia with
hydrops
 Evidence of fetal
extramedullary hematopoeisis


HPA-1a, HPA-5a, HPA-4
 Maternal antibodies against
paternal and fetal platelet
antigens
 Parental platelet incompatibility
for the pertinent antigen
 Fetal thrombocytopenia
 Massive intracranial
hemorrhage
Causes of stillbirth—NICHHD workshop consensus
CONGENITAL MALFORMATIONS
CHROMOSOMAL ABNORMALITIES
Criteria
Epidemiologic data demonstrating an excess
of intrauterine mortality
 Seen rarely in liveborn neonates
 When seen in liveborn neonates, it frequently
results in neonatal death
 Biologic plausibility that it can result in death

Congenital malformations
Cause of death
Stillbirth cases, % (out
of total 2211
assessed)
Trisomy 21
1.53
Jugulolymphatic obstruction
1.45
Turner syndrome
1.09
Twin-twin transfusion syndrome
1.09
Anencephaly
1.0
Trisomy 18
0.81
Amnion disruption sequence
0.59
Lower mesodermal defects
0.50
Idiopathic nonimmune fetal hydrops
0.50
Trisomy 13
0.41
Reddy, UM et al. “Stillbirth Classification—Developing an International
Consensus for Research.” Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol 114, No 4,
October 2009.
Chromosomal abnormalities
Incidence



Cytogenetic abnormalities
account for 6-13% of all stillbirths
This may be higher because 4050% attempted karyotypes fail
to grow
23% monosomy X, 23% trisomy
21, 21% trisomy 18, 8% trisomy 13
Kumar: Robbins pathologic basis
of disease, 8th edition. 2009
Chromosomal abnormalities
Autosomal recessive disorders


Alpha thalessemia, Smith Lemli
Opitz
Phenotype in lethal cases may
differ from live cases
Autosomal dominant disorders


Skeletal dysplasias
More often spontaneous
mutations
Firestein: Kelley’s Textbook of
Rheumatology, 9th ed. Saunders 2012
Causes of stillbirth—NICHHD workshop consensus
FETOMATERNAL HEMORRHAGE
Fetomaternal hemorrhage
The cause 4% of all stillbirths
 Risk factors:

◦
◦
◦
◦
Placental abruption
Abdominal trauma
Multiple gestation
Abnormal fetal testing
Fetomaternal hemorrhage

Risk of stillbirth depends on
◦ Amount of hemorrhage
◦ Acute/chronic
◦ Gestational age
A threshold of 20 mL/kg of fetal bleeding is
associated with increased risk of stillbirth
 Autopsy confirmation of fetal anemia and
hypoxia

Causes of stillbirth—NICHHD workshop consensus
PLACENTAL CAUSES
Placental causes
Placenta previa, vasa
previa, neoplasms
 Placental abruption
has 8.9 relative risk of
stillbirth

◦ May be considered the
cause of death if >30%
of the placenta shows
signs of abruption
Reddy, UM et al, 2009
Placental causes

Any disease that causes an SGA placenta may
result in stillbirth
◦ <5% expected weight for gestational age
◦ Preeclampsia, DM, HTN, renal, chronic infections

Any disease that causes an LGA placenta may
result in stillbirth
◦ >95% expected weight for gestational age
◦ Hydrops fetalis, DM, syphilis
Stillbirth classification—NICHHD workshop consensus
UMBILICAL CORD PATHOLOGY
Umbilical cord pathology
Account for 3.4-15% of stillbirths
 Velamentous insertion

◦ If it leads to a vasa previa or bleeding during labor

Umbilical cord prolapse
◦ Associated with prematurity, malpresentation,
mutiparity, obstetric manipulation

Umbilical cord occlusion
◦ Cord prolapse, entanglement (mono-mono twins)
◦ Torsion
◦ Rupture, strictures, hematomas
Velamentous insertion
Umbilical cord pathology
Nuchal cord
Isolated
ofpregnancies
a
relevant
◦•Exclude
Occurs in up
toother
30% finding
of normal
nuchal
cord
or a true risk of stillbirth in
◦ Not associated
with
an increased
causes
of
stillbirth
knot
at the time of
study of 14,000 deliveries
delivery is insufficient
•Find
of hypoxia
 True
knotevidence
evidence
that cord
◦and
Also common
in
live
births
cord
occlusion
on
accident
is
the
cause
of
◦ Grooving of the cord, constriction of the umbilical
stillbirth
postmortem
examination
vessels, edema, congestion,
thrombosisrequired to

claim it is the etiology
Stillbirth classification—NICHHD workshop consensus
MULTIFETAL GESTATION
Complications of multifetal gestation

Monochorionic
placentation
◦ Twin-twin transfusion
syndrome occurs in
9% of mono-di twins
◦ Mortality can be 90%
in untreated cases
Complications of multifetal gestation

Mono-mono twins
◦ Cord entanglement,
preterm birth, growth
impairment,
malformations, genetic
abnormalities, vascular
anastomoses
Gabbe: Obstetrics: normal and
problem pregnancies, 6th ed.
Saunders 2012
Causes of stillbirth—NICHHD workshop consensus
UTERINE COMPLICATIONS
Uterine complications

Uterine rupture
◦ Evidence of obstructed circulation

Uterine abnormalities
◦ There is an increased risk of uterine abnormalities in
women with recurrent pregnancy loss/stillbirth
◦ Possibly due to poorly vascularized uterine tissue or
space constraints
◦ Increased risk of PPROM, cervical insufficiency, preterm
labor
◦ Septate uterus has highest risk of stillbirth and placental
abruption
Evaluation of stillbirth
Workup
Workup of stillbirth
IMPORTANCE
Importance of a stillbirth evaluation
Counseling for risk of recurrence
 Possible intervention to reduce recurrence risk
 Facilitate emotional closure and healing

Most stillbirths remain unexplained

Incomplete evaluation
◦ Lack of clinician awareness
◦ Concerns of the family

Lack of single universally accepted
classification scheme
◦ Difficult to assign a definitive cause

Unknown cause
◦ Sometimes despite thorough evaluation
Workup of stillbirth
OVERVIEW
Overview
Recommended studies
Sometimes helpful
Not generally useful
•Autopsy
•Placental pathology
•Karyotype
•Kliehauer-Betke
•Indirect Coombs
•Acquired thrombophilia
panel
•Anti B2-glycoprotein ab
•Toxicology screen
•Syphilis serology
•Inherited thrombophilia
panel
•Glucose screening
•TSH
•CMV, toxoplasmosis, other
infectious
•Bile acids
•Sonohysterogram
•Routine TORCH titers
•ANA testing
•Cultures of placental
membranes
Silver et al, 2010
How do we know what works?
“Evaluation of 1025 fetal deaths: proposed diagnostic workup.”
Korteweg FJ, Erwich JJHM, Timmer A, et al. AJOG 2012.
 Prospective cohort study in 50 Dutch hospitals
 Singleton IUFDs at >=20wks gestation, excluding pregnancy
terminations and intrapartum deaths
 Cause of death determined by a multidisciplinary panel (2
obstetricians, an OB resident, perinatal pathologist, neonatologist,
genetics, microbiologist)

◦ Initial demonstratable pathophysiological entity initiating the chain of
events that irreversibly led to death

Contribution of each diagnostic test for determination of cause of
death was determined by the panel
◦ Valuable for “establishing cause of death” or “excluding cause of death”
Workup of stillbirth
MEDICAL HISTORY
Thorough medical/obstetrical history
Workup of stillbirth
EXAMINATION
OF THE FETUS
AND PLACENTA
Workup of stillbirth
EXAMINATION OF THE FETUS
Physician’s exam
Weight, head circumference, length
 Photographs

◦ Frontal and profie
◦ Whole body, face, extremeties, palms, abnormalities
Kumar: Robbins pathologic basis of disease, 8th edition. 2009
Time of demise
Finding
Time of demise
Brown or red discoloration of the cord stump
Desquamation >1cm
>6 hours ago
Desquamation of face, back, abdomen
>12 hours ago
Desquamation >5% of the body or >2 body
zones
>18 hours ago
Skin color brown or tan
>24 hours ago
Mummification
(reduced soft tissue, leathery skin, dark brown)
>2 weeks ago
“Estimating the time of death in stillborn fetuses: III. External fetal
examination; a study of 86 stillborns.” Genest DR, Singer DB. Obstet
and Gynecol, 1992; 80(4), 593
Autopsy
New information that influences counseling in
26-51% of cases
 Dutch study: valuable in 72% of cases
 However, it is performed in <50% of cases

◦ Clinician hesitation to recommend autopsy
◦ Patient reservations
Autopsy
Ask about patient reservations
 Emphasize potential benefits to family
 Allow the family ample time to hold the baby
and perform religious/cultural activities first

Autopsy
Medical autopsies require consent of next-of-kin
 Consent should be explicit enough that parents
can limit the autopsy procedure

Illinois Masonic Policy
“An autopsy is an option for fetuses 20 weeks or
greater, but if clinically indicated or requested
by the family, an autopsy can be offered
before 20 weeks.”
 If an autopsy is not requested, a Surgical
Pathology examination can be performed

Components of an autopsy


Review of the clinical history, laboratories,
antenatal imaging
External examination:
◦ Weight, crown-rump length, foot length, crown-heel
length, occipital-frontal circumference
◦ Joint mobility, facial features, hands, feet, genitalia

Intraoral examination:
◦ Pharynx, soft palate, uvula


Take into consideration changes from maceration
Photographs
External examination
Lentz: Comprehensive Gynecology, 6th ed
Kumar: Robbins pathologic basis
of disease, 8th edition. 2009
Components of an autopsy

Internal examination
◦ Y or T shaped incision on anterior trunk
◦ Organs examined in situ
◦ Heart sometimes opened in situ, sometimes removed
and fixed
 Vascular connections, septal defects
◦ Organs removed in bloc for detailed dissection
◦ Spinal cord removed
Components of an autopsy

Brain
◦ Coronal scalp incision extending to behind the ears
◦ Skull is opened along cranial sutures
◦ Can extend into posterior neck for posterior fossa
(Dandy-Walker, Chiari) by removing occipital bone
and cervical vertebrae
◦ Brain is placed in formalin for 10 days before
examination
Brain
Chiari malformation—downward displacement of medulla
Fligner 2011
Components of an autopsy

Samples of tissue for
◦ Microscopic evaluation
◦ Viral cultures
◦ Bacterial cultures

Metabolic studies (Guthrie card)
Histologic exam
Extramedullary
hematopoeisis in fetal liver
in fetus with non-immune
hydrops
Kumar: Robbins pathologic basis
of disease, 8th edition. 2009
What autopsy can identify

Markers of IUGR
◦ Head circumference percentile higher than weight
percentile
◦ Brain weight appropriate for gestation while other
organs are appropriate for body weight
◦ Altered brain weight:liver weight

Kidneys
◦ Polycystic kidney disease
Certain brain pathologies
 Congenital anomalies

Kidneys
A: 28 wks, suspicious for
autosomal recessive
polycystic kidney
disease
B: confirmed on
autopsy
C: 22 wks, suspicious for
ARPKD
D: Autopsy showed
diffuse renal cystic
dysplasia
Autopsy can provide evidence
Infection
 Anemia
 Hypoxia

Kumar: Robbins pathologic basis
of disease, 8th edition. 2009
Alternatives to autopsy

Partial autopsy
◦ Head-sparing autopsy (may miss CNS pathology)

External examination by a trained pathologist
◦ Can identify syndromes, congenital anomalies,
timing of death, growth anomalies
◦ Will likely miss fetal infections and internal anomalies

External examination with selected biopsies
◦ More likely to identify fetal infections
Alternatives to autopsy: MRI
Advantages
◦ Very good for CNS
pathology
 Sometimes better than
autopsy, because fetal
brain has high water
content and liquefies
◦ Fluid collections and
effusions in the body
Disadvantages
◦ May miss cardiac
anomalies, bowel
anomalies
◦ Cannot diagnose
infections or
metabolic disease
MRI
24 wks, massive
bilateral
intraventricular
hemorrhage
Fligner 2011
MRI

Image-guided percutaneous biopsies
◦ <50% success rate at obtaining tissue in one study
◦ Somewhat inferior to autopsy:
 12 cases where “minimally invasive autopsy” provided
equivalent information to autopsy
 12 cases where “minimally invansive autopsy” provided
inferior information than autopsy
 2 cases where MRI and biopsy provided superior information
 However, 73% of minimally invasive autopsies provided
Information of equivalent clinical significance to autopsy
Fligner 2011
Alternatives to autopsy

X ray
◦ Useful for skeletal dysplasias
◦ Ribs/vertebrae as part of diagnosis of VACTERL or
diabetic fetopathy
X ray
Achondrogenesis 1b
(absence of vertebral
bodies)
Fligner 2011
X ray
Hemivertebrae
(VACTERL)
Fligner 2011
Suggested workup of stillbirth
EXAMINATION OF THE PLACENTA
Examination of the placenta

The most valuable diagnostic test in most
studies
◦ Dutch study showed it to be valuable in 95% of cases

Provides additional information in 30% of cases
Examination of the placenta
Weight in relation to norms for gestational age
 Evidence of abruption, infarction,
thrombophilias
 Hemosiderin depositschronic abruption

◦ Perivillious and marginal fibrin deposition
◦ Decidual necrosis
◦ Evidence of infarction
Examination of the placenta
Multiples: chorionicity, vascular anastomoses in
multifetal gestations
 Cord: thrombosis, velamentous cord insertion,
vasa previa
 Evidence of infections

◦ More common in preterm stillbirth
◦ Viral nuclic acid amplification
◦ Bacterial cultures
Examination of the placenta
Kumar: Robbins pathologic basis of disease, 8th edition. 2009
Workup of stillbirth
GENETICS
Karyotype
Abnormal fetal karyotype noted in 8-13% of all
stillbirths and in >20% of those with morphologic
abnormalities or IUGR
 Dutch study: 11.9% prevalence of a
chromosomal abnormality in the 362 IUFDs who
underwent karyotyping

◦ 37% trisomy 21, 16% monosomy X, 4% trisomy 13

Karyotype was valuable in 29% of cases
Cell culture
Successful in only ~50% of cases
 Cells must be cultured in vitro—need
metaphase chromosomes
 Only 1% of cells are dividing at any time

Kumar: Robbins pathologic basis
of disease, 8th edition. 2009
Cell culture

Acceptable cytologic specimens:
◦ Amniotic fluid (yield is 84%) obtained by
amniocentesis at the time of prenatal diagnosis of
demise, 20-30mL
◦ 1x1cm placental block from below the cord insertion
site on an unfixed placenta
◦ 1.5cm segement of umbilical cord
◦ Internal fetal tissue specimen (costochondral
junction, patella, lung, kidney, gonad, not skin)
Cell culture

Collect the specimen in a sterile manner
◦ Prokaryotic cells outcompete and overgrow any
human cells
Transport to the laboratory as soon as possible
 Blood, amniotic fluid, chorionic villi at room
temperature
 Solid tissue transported on wet ice

◦ Lysosomal enzyme activity is inhibited at 4 C and
viability is maintained
Cell culture
Monolayer in situ
 Up to 2 weeks for solid tissue culture
 Cells are swelled hypotonically, ruptured
(blowing on the coverslip) and metaphase
chromosomes are spread
 Automatic robotic harvesters
 Stained with Giemsa or Wright

◦ Results in banding pattern unique to each
chromosome
Karyotype

Count the chromosomes in
each cell
◦ Technologist at a microscope
Must analyze 15-20 cells to
get karyotype
 Photograph of karyogram or
computer-assisted imaging

◦ Manipulate/move
chromosomes
◦ Pattern-recognition software to
generate karyogram
◦ Computer must be doublechecked by a technologist
Stein 2011
If culture is unsuccessful

Flourescent in-situ hybridization (FISH)
◦ Can test for the most common aneuploidies
◦ Can test for specific mutations
FISH

Molecular probe
◦ Fluorescent dye
◦ Visualized using fluorescence microscopy

Molecular probes can be
◦ Specific to certain mutations
◦ A cocktail that coats the whole chromosome

FISH can be performed on metaphase or
interphase chromosomes—cell culture not
required for FISH
FISH
DNA is denatured and allowed to hybridize with
the probe
 Nonhybridized DNA is then counterstained

FISH
X, X
Normal
chromosome
21
Trisomy 21
Stein 2011
FISH
Microdeletion in chromosome 22 associated
with DiGeorge syndrome
Stein 2011
FISH
Advantages
 Does not require
metaphase
chromosomes
 Can obtain
karyotype and
information about
mutations
Disadvantages
 Probes must be
known
genes/mutations
 Limited number of
colors can be seen
with fluorescent
microscope
FISH with computer-assisted system
•Fluorochromes can be mixed
•Too subtle for human eye, but computer assisted
systems allow detection of all 24 chromosomes
•Karyotype in interphase
Trisomy 18
and XXY
Stein 2011
If live cells are not available: Microarray

Screens the genome for copy number
variations (CNPs)
◦ BAC arrays provide overview of genome
◦ SNP arrays provide more detailed coverage with
probes on every 100-1000 base pairs
◦ Detects deletions, duplications, aneuploidies,
unbalanced translocations with a gain/loss of
sequences

Good for small deletions or cryptic changes
◦ Cytogenetics resolution is only 5-10Mb
Microarray
Stein 2011
Limitations

Many copy number changes are of uncertain
clinical significance
◦ More CNVs are being identified every day

It will not detect balanced translocations or
inversions
Microarray versus karyotyping
Reddy UM et al, 2012: Prospective populationbased study of 532 stillbirths over 2 years
 Patients with IUFD underwent:

◦ Interview, chart abstraction, postpartum
examination, placental pathology, karyotype
analysis, and specimen collection

DNA analyzed with an SNP microarray with
data aligned to Human Genome release 18
Microarray versus karyotyping
Benign CNV: full length listed in any of three
databases of unaffected persons
 Pathogenic CNV:

◦ Evidence of pathogenicity in literature
◦ A gene listed in the OMIM database that is known to
cause developmental/lethal disease
◦ In a pathogenic database
Probably benign CNV: no evidence of
pathogenicity in literature
 Unknown CNV

Microarray versus karyotyping
Microarray analysis yielded a result in 87.4%
stillbirths compared to 70.5% for karyotype
 85.2% of these were benign, too small, or
probably benign
 2.6% were pathogenic, 6.9% were aneuploid
 Microarray detected CNV consistent with
DiGeorge syndrome not detected by karyotype
in 3 cases

Conclusions: microarray
Genetic workup should
be guided by
Disadvantages
Advantages
family
history and presence
of
 More expensive
 Can
detect
congenital
mutations
tooanomalies
small
for FISH
 Higher
chance
of
Consider
microarray
when karyotype
obtaining
a result
fails to grow
in culture
Workup of stillbirth
MATERNAL WORKUP
Workup of stillbirth
IMMEDIATE MATERNAL WORKUP
Laboratories (Recommended)
CBC
 Kliehauer-Betke
 Human parvovirus B-19 IgG and IgM
 Lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies
 Indirect Coombs

◦ If not already done antepartum

Toxicology screen
Kliehauer Betke
Recommended to do before induction of labor
 However, given that only massive hemorrhage
is likely to cause fetal death, can also be done
up to 2-3 weeks after delivery
 In Dutch study, FMH was a contributing factor in
10.6% of the total cohort

Kliehauer Betke
Reddy et al 2009
Antiphospholipid antibodies
One fetal death satisfies criteria for testing
 Confirm with repeat testing in 6-12 weeks
Given
significant
implications
for
 More
likely
positive if stillbirth
was accompanied
by
IUGR
or severe
preeclampsia
future
pregnancies
and future
 Two dutch studies (750 fetal deaths in Korteweg et
health
of the
testing et
is al 2012)
al
2010, 1025
fetal mother,
deaths in Korteweg
showed
that neither
testing for acquired nor
generally
recommended
inherited thrombophilia is valuable

◦ Unless the patient has a family or personal history of
thrombophilia
Laboratories (Sometimes useful)





Syphilis
TSH
Inherited thrombophilia workup
Guided
by maternal
history
and risk
◦ Factor V Leiden,
prothrombin gene
mutation,
antithrombin III, fasting homocysteine
factors
Glucose screening
Sonohysterogram
◦ Especially if loss associated with preterm labor, PPROM,
cervical insufficiency, previable gestations, fetal
malpresentation
Inherited thrombophilia





Korteweg et al 2010. Multicenter, prospective
study.
750 singleton
fetal deaths
>=20 wks,
Consider
it in cases
of severe
excluding terminations
placental
pathology,
a and
Tested
for vWF,
antithrombin, IUGR,
protein or
C, total
free
protein
prothrombin gene mutation, factor
history
of S,thrombosis
V Leiden
However,
remember
most
Cause
of death
classified bythat
a panel
“Except
forwith
vWF and
paternal
free protein
S,
women
these
conditions
will
acquired and thrombophilic defects were not
haveprevalent
uncomplicated
pregnancies
more
after fetal death.”
However, many case-control studies show an
association
Laboratories (unproven benefit)

Toxoplasmosis, rubella, CMV, HSV, other
infections
◦ Viruses for which vaccines are prevalent are
uncommon in developed countries
◦ However, if autopsy, pathology, or history is
suggestive, take maternal/neonatal serology,
special tissue staines, testing for nucleic acids

ANA
Routine TORCH
Dutch study: of the women tested for TORCH,
17.0% had positive IgM for TORCH, parvo,
syphilis, or hepatitis B
 However only 1.8% of the total cohort had
infection as the cause of death

Suggested workup of stillbirth
POSTPARTUM MATERNAL WORKUP
In selected cases
Paternal karyotype
 Protein S and C activity
 Kliehauer-Betke

Evaluation of stillbirth
Considerations
AIMMC protocol
All intact fetal remains are sent to the morgue
within 4 hours of expiration, UNLESS a Surgical
Pathology examination is requested
 If a Surgical Pathology examination is requested

◦ Remains with a Surgical Pathology requisition to the
Histology Laboratory
◦ Central Transport and Nursing are responsible for the
initial transport of the body to the morgue and filling
out the morgue census sheet
AIMMC protocol
If autopsy is requested, the fetus is obtained
from the morgue
 An autopsy is an option for fetuses >=20 weeks

◦ But if clinically indicated or requested by the family,
an autopsy can be offered before 20 weeks
AIMMC protocol

Autopsies are performed by AIMMC
pathologists
◦ Trained in fetal/neonatal autopsies
◦ Consult specialists when needed
Preliminary result in 24 hours; final result in 30
days
 Genetic and molecular testing at ACL
 A fetus that undergoes an autopsy can still
receive private burial

Fetal death disposition notification

Within 24 hours after an
abortion/miscarriage the
mother must be informed
of her right to determine
the final disposition of the
remains
◦ Private burial
◦ Cremation
◦ Hospital disposition
Fetal death disposition notification
http://www.idph.st
ate.il.us/vitalrecord
s/pdf/Fetal%20Dea
th%20Disposition%2
0Notification.pdf
Fetal death disposition notification

If patient is unclear, sign the form without making a
selection
◦ RN notes “undecided at discharge”



Fax a copy to Mission and Spiritual Care at 773296-5010 and place a copy in the chart
Mission and Spiritual Care or the Perinatal Loss
Coordinator will follow up with the family
If the family can not be reached within 2 weeks,
Pathology will initiate the procedure for hospital
disposition
Private burial



Perinatal loss coordinator has a list of funeral
homes
Cremation or burial
Only a licensed funeral director can pick up the
fetus
◦ Parents provide the name to Health Information
Management

Cost: some funeral home directors reduce the rate
◦ Medicaid pays for modest funeral and burial

For very young fetuses, parents advised that there
might not be many remains after autopsy
Hospital disposition

St Luke’s Cemetery
◦ 5300 N. Pulaski Road, Chicago, IL 60630
“Babyland,” exact location not identified
 No charge

Perinatal loss coordinator
Always notifiy Anna Zieba (pager 61-7656,
phone 61-7127)
 Always notify Mission and Spiritual Care 61-5005

◦ Can provide religious services from most religions
Considerations

Parents benefit from seeing/holding the infant
◦ Warn them about how the baby will appear
Use the term “baby”
 Encourage parents to name the infant

◦ Knowing the sex is important
Fetal loss can be devastation at any gestational
age
 Different cultures grieve in different ways

Considerations
Keepsakes and memory boxes
 Child Life specialist can aid with siblings
 For a loss in the ER, consider consulting crisis if
parents show signs of depression
 Bereavement care track after discharge

Evaluation of stillbirth
Conclusions
Conclusions
The cause of a stillbirth is the initial
pathophysiologic entity that irreversibly led to
fetal death
 Cause must be proven with evidence of fetal
harm
 There are many benefits to finding a cause
 Encourage patients to allow an evaluation
within the boundaries of their personal and
cultural values

Conclusions
Recommended laboratories are CBC,
Kliehauer-Betke, parvovirus B-19 IgG and IgM,
lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies,
and toxicology screen
 Only perform other labs as indicated by
maternal history
 Encourage patients to receive an autopsy

◦ Partial autopsy and MRI are alternatives

Always send the placenta to pathology
Conclusions
Encourage karyotyping
 Base evaluation for other chromosomal
abnormalities on family history and results of
other studies
 Consider FISH or microarray if low likelihood of
getting a result from cell culture
 Utilize hospital resources for perinatal loss

THANK YOU
Evaluation of stillbirth
Sources









ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 102. “Management of Stillbirth.” American College of
Obstetricians and Gynecologists. March 2009. acog.org
Fligner CL, Dighe M. “Fetal and Perinatal Death Investigation: Redefining the Autopsy and
the Role of Radiologic Imaging.” Ultrasound Clin 6, 2011 (105-117).
Illinois Masonic Medical Center Perinatal Loss Policy. Policy 20.118.044
Korteweg FJ, Erwich JJHM, Timmer A, et al. “Evaluation of 1025 fetal deaths: proposed
diagnostic workup.” Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206:53.e1-12.
Korteweg FJ, Erwich JJHM, et al. “Prevalence of Parental Thrombophilic Defects after Fetal
Death and Relation to Cause.” Obstet and Gynecol. August 2010, Vol 116, No 2, part 1.
Kumar: Robbins and Coltran Pathologic Basis of Disease, Professional Edition, 8th ed. 2009
Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier.
Reddy UM, Goldenburg R, et al. “Stillbirth Classification—Developing an International
Consensus for Research.” Obstet and Gynecol. Oct 2009, Vol 114, No 4.
Reddy UM, Page GP, Saade GR. “Karyotype versus Microarray testing for Genetic
Abnormalities after Stillbirth.” N Engl J med 367; 23, December 2012
Silver R, Heuser C. “Stillbirth Workup and Delivery Management.” Clin Obstet and Gynecol
2010; 53, 3.
Stein, CK. “Applications of cytogenetics in Modern Pathology.” McPherson: Henry’s Clinical
Diagnosis and Management by Laboratory Methods, 22nd ed. 2011 Saunders, an imprint of
Elsevier.
Download