Human Mental Abilities Lecture 1 Leonardo Gabales Griffith-Taylor 310 9351 7479 leong@psych.usyd.edu.au 1 Human Mental Abilities Intelligence or cognitive abilities… A central aspect of Individual Differences or Differential Psychology Abilities Personality Preferences, beliefs, & tendencies, etc… Everyone is in certain respects… (a) like all other people, (b) like some other people, (c) like no other people. 2 Differential Psychology As a scientific discipline is concerned with… Description, Explanation, & Prediction …of reliable individual variation in human behaviour (e.g., ability test scores, responses on questionnaires, performance) rather than aggregated group differences per se 3 Implicit Notions of Intelligence… Thinks about things logically Has a good store of information Has good problem-solving skills Has a good memory Has good reasoning skills Is creative Processes information quickly An intelligent person … Learns new things quickly Is highly educated Others … 4 What is intelligence?! Differences between ‘lay’ (or naïve) & scientific approaches to understanding intelligence… In every day life we observe, try to understand, & predict the behaviour of others Based on… systems of culturally based beliefs & subjective evaluations of human behaviour & its potential causes Implicit assumptions about causes of behaviour Implicit assumptions about distributions 5 ‘Lay’ vs Scientific Approaches Judgments based on ‘lay’ understandings of intelligence (& other psychological concepts) are useful in our day-to-day lives… but, are: Imprecise Inconsistent Not useful as psychological (scientific) theories Good news - bad news Good: similar terminologies Bad: similar terminologies 6 What is intelligence?! “Intelligence is a word with so many meanings that finally it has none” Charles Spearman (1927) “Intelligence is what the tests test” e.g. Boring (1951) Because … Person ‘X’ is intelligent Because … Person ‘X’ performs well on intelligence tests 7 An “Intelligence” Test What is the capital of Turkmenistan? Ashgabat Who wrote “At the Mountains of Madness?” H. P. Lovecraft What is the most number of Oscars won by a film? Name the film/films. 11: LotR: Return of the King, Titanic, and Ben-Hur What is longest streak of consecutive NBA titles? Name the team. 8: Boston Celtics 8 Intelligence is what intelligence test test?! As you can see from our “intelligence” test there are big problems with this… Doesn’t help our understanding of what intelligence actually is Allows us to define intelligence as almost anything Problems with reliability and validity (which, we will come back to later) 9 Cognitive Abilities There is a need to make a distinction between cognitive abilities & task performance J. B. CARROLL (1993) Cognitive tasks: ‘Any task in which correct or appropriate processing of mental information is critical to successful performance’ Cognitive ability: ‘Any ability that concerns some class of cognitive tasks, so defined’ 10 Intelligence as a construct Two levels: Manifest variables – observable… What we can see (e.g., behaviour, test scores, responses) Latent variables – unobservable… What we infer – constructs (e.g., abilities, traits, states) Task 1 Cognitive Ability Task 2 Task 3 11 Constructs Theoretical (or hypothetical) terms which cannot be directly observed, but are assumed to exist because they give rise to measurable phenomena Constructs are not discovered, but constructed Description (& explanation) of behavioural & performance data Basis for prediction of behaviour Constructs are defined by: Empirical indicators Relationships to other constructs Network of constructs (nomological network) = theory THEREFORE: Theory & measurement are inextricably linked12 Psychological Assessment Psychometric tests do not provide a perfect index of cognitive ability Behaviour (e.g., test performance) is often viewed as a function of person (e.g., cognitive ability) & situation (test context) factors Performance in Situation X ? Behaviour in Situation Y ? ‘Manifest’ or observable ? ‘Latent’ or unobservable Cognitive Factors Non-Cognitive Factors 13 A (Brief) History: Galton Francis GALTON [1822-1911] – the founder of modern individual differences psychology: Developed a variety of (psychophysical) measuring instruments (e.g., Galton whistle) Developed the first anthropometric laboratory Data on a large number of psychological & physical measures (across a sample size of thousands) was obtained 14 Galton Drew attention to statistical distributions (esp. the Gaussian normal curve) that might describe many physical & psychological characteristics Developed regression techniques leading to the construction of the coefficient of correlation Pioneering research in behaviour genetics: work on regression techniques and the normal curve were combined - the concept of "regression to the mean" 15 Galton 16 Galton Hereditary Genius (1869) claimed that intellectual genius tended to run in families: “I have no patience with the hypothesis that the sole agencies creating differences between men are steady application and effort” Inquiries into the Human Faculty … (1883) laid the foundations for a theory of cognitive abilities Claimed tests should be used to identify mental strengths & weaknesses 17 Galton Galton’s efforts to measure intelligence were ultimately a failure: Tests measured: body length, reaction time, visual acuity & body breadth - only RT could be regarded as anything like a cognitive ability Failure was due to the variables selected “All the information that reaches us passes through the avenue of the senses; the more perceptive the senses, the larger the field on which our intelligence can act” 18 A (Brief) History: McKeen Cattell James McKEEN CATTELL [1860-1944] Main figure behind the mental testing movement during the 1890s - credited with coining the term ‘mental test’ Developed an extensive test battery administered to many college students included tests of RT, sensory discrimination, word associations, picture-naming speed & others 19 A (Brief) History: Wissler Clark WISSLER [1870-1947] Attempted to associate results from Y tests with ‘other’ estimates of intelligence – reasoned that Y test scores should relate to academic performance Conducted the first extensive application of the correlational method (1901) Found disappointingly low correlations between Y test scores (including RT) & college grades 20 A (Brief) History: Spearman Charles SPEARMAN [1863-1945] One of the first to use correlation coefficients in large-scale empirical research Developed the statistical method of factor analysis Proposed the g-factor theory of intelligence that has supporters to this day 21 A (Brief) History: Binet Alfred BINET [1857-1911] Shifted emphasis to examine ‘higher mental processes’ - designing tests to measure ‘complex’ abilities (The Stanford-Binet IV is still used today) An attempt to ensure ‘defective children receive the benefits of tuition’ - no clear definition regarding mental retardation developed ‘mental age’ IQ 22 A (Brief) History: Binet Tasks varied widely – although most relied on understanding language or the ability to reason with verbal or non-verbal material The scale & revisions formed the basis for the development of intelligence scales (both individual & group) in a number of countries & languages Development & refinement of Y tests was accompanied by evolution of statistical techniques 23 Defining Y Tests A measure of a sample of behaviour Since one sample is likely to provide an unreliable estimate - tests provide several samples of the behaviour of interest (i.e., items) The final measure is some function of an individual's response (i.e., appropriately marked items) 24 Test Items To provide a meaningful estimate of the behaviour of interest, items should be based on: Some meaningful theory about the nature of cognition (cognitive tests) Drawn from a well-defined domain (achievement tests) 25 Uses of Y Tests “Mental tests are psychology’s greatest contribution to society” (Anastasi & Urbina, 1999) Tests are employed in many areas, including: Education Personnel selection Clinical assessment 26 Criticisms of Y Tests During the 1970s, mental testing came under attack by social scientists The main criticisms concerned: Bias in psychological test The static nature of intelligence test scores 27 Bias in Y Testing Significant differences between groups: Racial differences - black vs. white Gender differences - male vs. female Age differences - young vs. old Socio-economic differences - rich vs. poor CLAIM: differences b/w groups are not real, BUT … a consequence of bias in mental tests 28 Bias in Y Testing A large number of studies examining the issue of bias were conducted during the 1980s It is now generally accepted that: Most tests when used appropriately contain little bias Psychometric tests don’t hurt people - people hurt people Other assessments proposed as replacements for psychological tests often demonstrate more bias 29 Static Nature of Y Test Scores Psychometric tests provide only a single score - the final outcome of a problem solving process This score is the sum of coded answers to test items & places an individual relative to others taking the same test 30 Static Nature of Y Test Scores This score has nothing to say about: The way a person thinks The steps underlying the solution process The nature of cognitive processing employed This line of criticism has prompted: New ways of testing intelligence (e.g., adaptive testing, dynamic assessments) Theory (rather than operationally) based psychometric test paradigms 31 Summary Intelligence as a latent construct… The distinction between cognitive abilities & cognitive task performance Theory development is linked to greater sophistication in assessment/measurement Psychometric tests contain little bias when used appropriately & represent better options in assessment than alternatives 32 Think about how stupid the average person is; now realise half of them are dumber than that. (George Carlin) 33