India’s Trade Policy Choices MANAGING DIVERSE CHALLENGES SANDRA POLASKI A. GANESH-KUMAR SCOTT MCDONALD MANOJ PANDA SHERMAN ROBINSON February 2008 India’s Exports, Imports, and GDP TRADE VALUE (BILLIONS, CONSTANT 2000 DOLLARS) 700 Imports Exports GDP 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 Source: United Nations, UN COMTRADE database. 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 Key Domestic Challenges That Affect India’s Trade Policy Choices • Poverty • Agriculture and rural development • Employment creation To illustrate . . . Poverty in India, 2004-2005 Percentage of population Number of persons (millions) World Bank $1/day World Bank $1/day * World Bank $2/day World Bank $2/day * * Using revised PPP estimates (forthcoming) National poverty line Analytical Tools and Simulations • Computable general equilibrium (CGE) model of global trade • Computable general equilibrium (CGE) model of the Indian economy • Social accounting matrix with considerable detail on sources of household income • Simulated Doha agreement and bilateral free trade with EU, US and China Simulation of a Doha Agreement Doha Simulation • Tariff reductions for agriculture, NAMA: – 36% by developed countries – 24% by developing countries • Agricultural subsidy reductions – Domestic subsidies reduced by 1/3 – Export subsidies eliminated • Reductions taken from applied rates • Services trade liberalization not simulated Macroeconomic Results for India of a Doha Agreement Major Changes in Indian Exports under a Doha Agreement CHANGE FROM BASE SIMULATION (BILLION DOLLARS) Wearing apparel Other manufacturing Textiles Chemicals Minerals and metals Trade and transportation Services 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 Major Changes in Indian Imports under a Doha Agreement CHANGE FROM BASE SIMULATION (BILLION DOLLARS) Other manufacturing Minerals and metals Chemicals Vegetable oils and fats Oil and gas Vehicles 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 Other Doha-related Simulations • Impact of volatility of world agricultural prices – Rice – Wheat • Simulations: +/- 25%, +/- 50% change in world price • World price shocks would affect India differently after it reduces tariffs toward the rest of the world • Distributional effects of agricultural price shocks among households reveal strong risk of increased poverty The World Price of Rice, 1980-2006 $/TON (CONSTANT 1990 DOLLARS) 600 550 500 450 -61% 400 350 300 +39% 250 -42% +43% -31% +56% 200 Note: Figures given are for Thai 5% broken milled rice. Source: World Bank, “Commodity Markets Briefs: Rice.” 06 20 04 20 02 20 00 20 98 19 96 19 94 19 92 19 90 19 88 19 86 19 84 19 82 19 19 80 150 Impact of a Decrease in the World Rice, 50% decrease, urban Price of Rice on Indian Households 25% decrease CHANGE IN REAL INCOME (PERCENT CHANGE RELATIVE TO BASELINE NOMINAL INCOME TO HOUSEHOLDS) Scheduled Tribes Scheduled Castes Other Backward Classes Others -----------------------------------Rural------------------------------------ Scheduled Tribes 50% decrease Scheduled Castes Other Backward Classes Others -----------------------------------Urban------------------------------------ ImpactRice, of a Decrease in the World Price 50% decrease, urban of Rice on the Demand for Indian Labor 25% decrease CHANGE IN DEMAND FOR LABOR (PERCENT CHANGE FROM BASELINE) 50% decrease 2.00 0.00 -2.00 -4.00 -6.00 -8.00 -10.00 -12.00 -14.00 Rice sector Agricultural sector Manufacturing sector Services sector Impact of a Doha Agreement compared to Impact of a Decrease in the World Price of Rice (PERCENT CHANGE FROM BASELINE) Impact of an Increase in the World Rice, 50% decrease, urban Price of Rice on Indian Households 25% increase CHANGE IN REAL INCOME (PERCENT CHANGE RELATIVE TO BASELINE NOMINAL INCOME TO HOUSEHOLDS) Scheduled Tribes Scheduled Castes Other Backward Classes Others -----------------------------------Rural------------------------------------ Scheduled Tribes 50% increase Scheduled Castes Other Backward Classes Others -----------------------------------Urban------------------------------------ -1.00 0.00 Wearing apparel Other animal products Utilities Raw milk Oil and gas Wood and paper products Services Construction Petroleum products Vehicles and transport equipment Other manufacturing Chemicals Coal Textiles Minerals and metals Plant based fibres Vegetable oils and fats Trade and transportation Rice Other crops Oil seeds Other food products Processed rice Meat products Cattle, sheep, goats Dairy products Wheat Impact of a Doha Agreement on Aggregate World Prices CHANGE IN PRICES (PERCENT) 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 Impact of a Doha Agreement on the Rest of the World CHANGE IN REAL INCOME (BILLION DOLLARS) 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 -1.00 -2.00 Australia, New Zealand, Oceania China Japan Rest of East Asia Rest of South Aisa Rest of NAFTA United States Mercosur Rest of the Americas EU South Africa Rest of SubSaharan Africa Middle East, North Africa Rest of world Simulation of an India-EU Free Trade Agreement The Evolution of India-EU Trade TRADE VALUE (BILLIONS, CONSTANT 2000 DOLLARS) 35.00 Exports (from India to EU) 30.00 Imports (from EU to India) 25.00 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 0.00 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Note: In 2004, the EU expanded from fifteen to twenty-five countries. Earlier data are for EU-15; post-2004 data are for EU25. Source: United Nations, UN COMTRADE database. Macroeconomic Results for India of an India-EU FTA Macroeconomic Results for the EU of an India-EU FTA Simulation of an India-U.S. Free Trade Agreement The Evolution of India-U.S. Trade TRADE VALUE (BILLIONS, CONSTANT 2000 DOLLARS) 25.00 Exports (from India to U.S.) Imports (from U.S. to India) 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 0.00 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Source: United Nations, UN COMTRADE database. 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Macroeconomic Results for India of an India-U.S. FTA Macroeconomic Results for the U.S. of an India-U.S. FTA Simulation of an India-China Free Trade Agreement The Evolution of India-China Trade TRADE VALUE (BILLIONS, CONSTANT 2000 DOLLARS) 14.00 Exports (from India to China) Imports (from China to India) 12.00 10.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Source: United Nations, UN COMTRADE database. 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Macroeconomic Results for India of an India-China FTA Macroeconomic Results for China of an India-China FTA Comparison of the Impact on India of Different Trade Policy Choices Change in Real Income for India under Different Trade Agreements CHANGE IN REAL INCOME (BILLION DOLLARS) 1.40 1.20 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 -0.20 -0.40 Doha India-EU FTA India-U.S. FTA India-China FTA Change in Real Income for Indian Households under Different Trade Agreements CHANGE IN REAL INCOME (BILLION DOLLARS) 1.00 0.50 0.00 -0.50 -1.00 -1.50 Doha India-EU FTA India-U.S. FTA India-China FTA Change in Domestic Production in India under Different Trade Agreements CHANGE IN PRODUCTION (BILLION DOLLARS) 5 4.5 CHANGE IN PRODUCTION (PERCENT) Change in production (billion dollars) 1 Change in production (percent) 0.9 4 0.8 3.5 0.7 3 0.6 2.5 0.5 2 0.4 1.5 0.3 1 0.2 0.5 0.1 0 0 Doha India-EU FTA India-U.S. FTA India-China FTA Change in Indian Imports and Exports under Different Trade Agreements CHANGE (BILLION DOLLARS) 4.00 3.50 3.00 Imports Exports 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 Doha India-EU FTA India-U.S. FTA India-China FTA Change in Demand for Unskilled Labor under Different Trade Agreements CHANGE IN DEMAND FOR UNSKILLED LABOR (PERCENT) 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 Doha India-EU FTA India-U.S. FTA India-China FTA Conclusions • Multilateral liberalization through the WTO’s Doha Round would produce larger gains for India than bilateral agreements with any of its major trading partners. • Gains (losses) in real income to the Indian economy from either multilateral or bilateral trade agreements are modest, ranging from a gain of $1.2 billion under the Doha simulation to a loss of $250 million under the India-EU FTA. Conclusions, continued • Indian exports and imports increase under all simulated agreements, with the strongest increases under an India-EU FTA, followed by a Doha pact. • However total domestic production increases very modestly, ranging from an increase of 0.52% under a Doha agreement to 0.34% under an India-EU FTA to 0.14% under an India-China FTA. • The three bilateral agreements result in losses for Indian households as a group, while Doha produces small gains ($530 million, 0.17%) for households. Conclusions, continued • Volatility in world agricultural prices would affect India more strongly after a reduction in tariffs toward trading partners. • Decreases in the world price of rice have a negative effect on Indian households similar in magnitude to the positive impact of the entire Doha agreement. • Agricultural price decreases would worsen income distribution and could significantly increase rural poverty. Conclusions, continued • In the Doha Round, India’s attention to its defensive agricultural interests is warranted. • “Special products” designations and a special safeguard mechanism would be needed tools to shield poor households from world agricultural price volatility until other sectors grow sufficiently to absorb their labor. • Employment creation will receive only a mild boost from trade liberalization. Domestic demand and labor policy will continue to be the main determinants of job creation. Conclusions, continued • Services liberalization could add to India’s potential gains; however few offers on services of interest to India have been tabled in the Doha Round. • In negotiations with the EU, significant services liberalization would be required for India to experience net gains in real income to the overall economy, as well as to offset losses to households. Conclusions, continued • Given the low incomes of most Indian households and high levels of poverty, even short-term welfare losses are not to be taken lightly. • Both Doha and bilateral pacts require careful negotiation if India is to realize the modest gains on offer and avoid risking large negative effects on the households of the poor. Thank you for your attention