Equality impact Assessment form (Part 1) Screening Name of strategy/policy/procedure/project/function: Core Strategy Development Plan Document Name and telephone number of officers completing assessment: Bev Hindle ext 6512 Julia Dawe ext 6168 Date completed: 29 December 2008 Section one: Identify your aims and objectives The purpose of an Equality Impact Assessment is to improve the work of the Council by making sure it does not discriminate and that, where possible, it promotes equality. It is a way to make sure individuals and teams think carefully about the likely impact of their work on people in Reigate & Banstead and take action to improve strategies, policies, procedures, projects and functions where appropriate. Consider the following questions with regard to your strategy/policy/procedure/project/function: How will it be put into practice and who will be responsible for it? Who are the key stakeholders? What are you trying to achieve and for whom? What is the main aim or purpose of the strategy/policy/procedure/project/function? The main purpose of the Core Strategy is to guide land use planning proposals and decisions and infrastructure investment priorities and delivery across the Borough up to 2026. The policies central to the Core Strategy deal with a variety of land uses including housing, countryside and transport but also specify where development should be directed and when it should be delivered. 1 List the main activities or objectives of the strategy/policy/procedure/project/function (for strategies list the main policy areas): Spatial vision for how the Borough should grow to 2026; Spatial planning policies which reflect the character of the Borough, protecting areas of special character and also directing where development should take place; Place-shaping policies which state how much and what type of development should be taking place in specific areas where growth is being directed; Cross-cutting policy themes such as affordable housing and transport which affect the whole of the Borough; Implementation policies which set out how the Council will seek to secure development that is sustainable. Who are main beneficiaries of the strategy/policy/procedure/project/function and in what way? The Borough’s “public” which includes: residents; businesses and workers in the Borough; shoppers in our town centres; those who use our leisure and countryside facilities (e.g. pools, footpaths); those looking to invest in the Borough (e.g. land agents, house-hunters, businesses). They all benefit from the certainty the policies establish over the kind of Borough we want to have by 2026 and over where infrastructure investment will take place – also through the improved communities that new infrastructure investment brings. Section two: Consider data and research A vital part of the process is exploring any available data and relevant research. This will help to form an opinion on the implications a strategy/policy/procedure/project/function may have in relation to equality and diversity. Data can be statistical information from formal audits, consultation exercises (both external and internal), and surveys. Qualitative and quantitative data can be used. This may include service performance information, workforce profiles, local population and census data. Statistical data can be found in the About the Borough section of The Knowledge under Facts and figures Consultation data can be found in the About the Borough section under Consultations Where data is limited or not available managers should identify this as a limitation and devise action plans to overcome this. This may be achieved by contacting specialist organisations, representatives from the respective equality groups, and by further research of existing regional and national data. What data is available to help inform the EIA? 2 Census data; Government projections (e.g. ONS population projections); Evidence base prepared to assist in developing the Local Development Framework (the overall planning policy framework which includes the Core Strategy) – this includes, for example, economic needs assessment; affordable housing needs assessment and viability appraisal; flood risk assessment; retail needs assessment. Are there any gaps which may require further research or consultation? There is an inherent gap between our knowledge of demographic conditions today and our ability to accurately project future demographics. The nature of any projection is that it is an estimate. Thorough analysis and regular updates are required to keep this information up to date. Consultation on these projections is important as it allows others to challenge the assumptions for the projections which in aid should help them to be robust. Section three: Assess the impact on equality target groups Assess where you think that the strategy/policy/procedure/project/function could have a negative impact on any of the equality target groups i.e. it could disadvantage them or where it could have a positive impact or contribute to promoting equality, equal opportunities or improving relations within equality target groups. Consider the following: publicity, including design, distribution, accessible communications issues physical access location, geography poverty, deprivation and social exclusion issues employment safety direct discrimination: does the strategy, policy or project intentionally exclude a particular equality category? Is this justified? indirect discrimination: does the strategy/policy/procedure/project/function affect some equality categories disproportionately? Is this justified? Is the strategy/policy/procedure/project/function or its outcomes (such as the services provided) likely to be equally accessed by all? Are there barriers that might inhibit or restrict access to the service for some people? This section can be difficult to answer in areas where there is little or no information but lack of data should not be a reason to halt the process. Please continue to complete this form. Using the table below, take each one of the equality target groups and predict the likely impact on people from these groups. Impact can be positive, negative, direct or indirect. You do not have to complete all the boxes. Only those where there is a disproportionate or greater impact either way. 3 Positive impact (it could benefit) Women Gender Men Transgendered Men/Women Asian Neutral High Low High Low High Low High Low Race The categories used in the Race section are those used in the 2001 census. Consideration should be given to the needs of specific communities within the broad categories. Black Mixed race White Chinese Other racial or ethnic groups specify Physical High Low High Low High Low High Low High Low High Low Disability Long term health impairment could include, mental health problems, asthma, heart conditions, chronic fatigue etc. Sensory Learning Long Term Health Impairment Sexual orientation Heterosexuals, lesbians, gay men and bisexuals Reason Negative impact (it could disadvantag e) High Low High Low High Low High Low Policies and consultation are strategic and non-gender based. As above As above Consultation did not specifically target any race – documents available in other languages as required or requested As above As above As above As above Should be a positive bias towards Gypsy and Traveller communities as the CS includes positive action policies for the provision of housing sites for these groups. Includes inclusive design policies which seeks to promote developments which take all physical disabilities into account (shouldn’t it be all disabilities???) As above Economic Needs assessment pointed towards need for training and picked up in Core Strategy Core Strategy picked up local obesity issue and connected to policies seeking and encouraging greater recreational opportunities Consultation has not been directed to any specific groups based on sexual orientation. Not expected to be impact. 4 Positive impact (it could benefit) Neutral Reason Negative impact (it could disadvantag e) Older people High Low Age Younger people and children High Low Could be benefit as facilities and housing for older people are actively promoted in CS policies. Should be positive benefit as policies seek to deliver better education and youth facilities. Religion or belief Faith groups cover a wide range of groupings, the most common of which are Buddhists, Christians, Hindus, Jews, Muslims, and Sikhs. Consider faith categories individually and collectively when considering positive and negative impacts. Faith groups High Low May be benefit as community facilities sought from new development may include, where need is shown, land for religious facilities. If you have indicated there is a potential negative impact on any group, are these Intentional and of a High Impact? Intended? – i.e. can be justified in terms of legislation e.g. Concessionary fares over 60s Yes No High impact? – i.e. it is or may be discriminatory against some groups. Yes No Is the negative impact NOT INTENDED and/or of HIGH IMPACT? If yes, a full assessment is required. Please complete the Equality impact assessment form Part Two: Full assessment. If no, complete the rest of this form below and consider if completing the Equality impact assessment form Part Two: Full assessment would be helpful in making a thorough assessment. Do not ignore low impacts – these could help you develop services in the future. 5 Section four: Improvement planning It is important to consider any influence the strategy/policy/procedure/project/function is having, or could potentially have, on the individual strands of equality. The strategy/policy/procedure/project/function should be examined for its effectiveness in: promoting equality eliminating discrimination achieving equity Could you minimise or remove any low negative impact or improve the positive impact of the strategy/policy/procedure/project/function and if so how? Analysis must be undertaken with the strategic objectives of the Council in mind and the questions should reflect legal requirements, the emerging Local Development Framework and population needs. Use the table below to record how you could minimise or remove any low negative impact or improve the positive impact of the strategy/policy/procedure/project/function: Issue More direct consultation with minority groups could create more positive impact. Action Should review the Council’s Statement of Community Involvement to determine if there are better, more thorough ways of engaging all groups in the Borough. A pragmatic approach is needed as it may not be feasible or viable to engage at individual level. If there is no evidence that the strategy/policy/procedure/project/function promotes equality, equal opportunities or improved relations – could it be adapted so that it does? How? N/A 6 Section five: Monitoring and reviewing What data do you have which monitors the impact of the strategy/policy/procedure/project/function on minority groups? The Annual Monitoring Report includes data on affordable housing provision and the number of sites available for gypsies and travellers is also recorded. How is this data used? Sufficient supply of land for housing, affordable housing and for the gypsy and travelling communities must be maintained. If insufficient sites are available to meet need, the Council has a duty to identify suitable sites through its planning policies. If there is no data, please explain how you intend to continue monitoring the impact of this strategy/policy/procedure/project/function: N/A Please send a copy of the completed form to the Equalities Steering Group, via Lorraine Hatton at lorraine.hatton@reigate-banstead.gov.uk. 7