A GAP ANALYSIS OF
MICHIGAN
2004 Michigan Final Report
A GEOGRAPHIC APPROACH TO PLANNING FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
DRAFT 02/01/05
THE MICHIGAN
GAP ANALYSIS PROJECT
FINAL REPORT
November 2004
Michael L. Donovan (PI and State Coordinator), Michigan DNR
Genevieve M. Nesslage (PI, Wildlife Modeling), Michigan State University
Jennifer J. Skillen (PI, Wildlife Modeling) Michigan State University
Brian A. Maurer (PI, Wildlife Modeling) Michigan State University
Contract Administered Through:
Wildlife Division
Michigan Department of Natural Resources
Submitted by:
Michael L. Donovan
Research Performed Under:
Cooperative Agreement No. 99HQAG0185
Recommended citation for this report:
Donovan, M. L., G.M. Nesslage, J. J. Skillen, and B. A. Maurer. 2004. The Michigan
Gap Analysis Project Final Report. Wildlife Division, Michigan Department of Natural
Resources, Lansing.
i
DRAFT 02/01/05
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................... ii
LIST OF FIGURES............................................................................................................ iv
LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................. vi
LIST OF APPENDICIES .................................................................................................. vii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................. 1
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................ 4
INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 6
How This Report is Organized ........................................................................................ 6
The Gap Analysis Program Mission ................................................................................ 6
State Objectives for GAP ............................................................................................ 7
The Gap Analysis Concept .............................................................................................. 7
General Limitations ......................................................................................................... 9
The Study Area ................................................................................................................ 9
A Brief Description of Michigan ................................................................................ 9
LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION AND MAPPING ................................................... 13
Introduction.................................................................................................................... 13
Land Cover Classification ............................................................................................. 13
Methods ......................................................................................................................... 14
Land Cover Map Development ................................................................................. 15
Results ........................................................................................................................... 17
Accuracy Assessment .................................................................................................... 20
Introduction ............................................................................................................... 20
Methods..................................................................................................................... 20
Results ....................................................................................................................... 21
Limitations and Discussion ........................................................................................... 21
PREDICTED ANIMAL SPECIES DISTRIBUTIONS AND SPECIES RICHNESS ...... 24
Introduction.................................................................................................................... 24
Methods ......................................................................................................................... 25
Mapping Standards and Data Sources ...................................................................... 25
Mapping Range Extent ............................................................................................. 27
Wildlife Habitat Relationships .................................................................................. 29
Distribution Modeling............................................................................................... 29
Results ........................................................................................................................... 33
Mammals................................................................................................................... 33
Birds .......................................................................................................................... 34
Reptiles and Amphibians .......................................................................................... 35
Species Richness ....................................................................................................... 36
Accuracy Assessment .................................................................................................... 44
Limitations and Discussion ........................................................................................... 45
Data layers................................................................................................................. 45
Model Limitations ..................................................................................................... 46
Amphibians and Reptiles .......................................................................................... 46
Mammals................................................................................................................... 46
ii
DRAFT 02/01/05
Birds .......................................................................................................................... 46
LAND STEWARDSHIP................................................................................................... 48
Introduction.................................................................................................................... 48
Mapping Standards ........................................................................................................ 49
Methods ......................................................................................................................... 49
Stewardship Mapping ............................................................................................... 49
Management Status Categorization .......................................................................... 50
Results ........................................................................................................................... 51
Limitations and Discussion ........................................................................................... 54
ANALYSIS BASED ON STEWARDSHIP AND MANAGEMENT STATUS.............. 55
Introduction.................................................................................................................... 55
Methods ......................................................................................................................... 56
Results ........................................................................................................................... 56
Land Cover Analysis ................................................................................................. 56
Limitations and Discussion for Land Cover Analysis .............................................. 58
Predicted Animal Species Distributions Analysis .................................................... 58
Analysis of State Endemics....................................................................................... 64
Eco-Regional Analysis .............................................................................................. 64
Limitations and Discussion ....................................................................................... 65
CONCLUSIONS AND MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS .......................................... 70
PRODUCT USE AND AVAILABILITY ......................................................................... 72
How to Obtain the Products........................................................................................... 72
Disclaimer ...................................................................................................................... 72
Appropriate and Inappropriate Use of These Data ........................................................ 73
Scale .......................................................................................................................... 73
Appropriate Uses ...................................................................................................... 73
Inappropriate Uses .................................................................................................... 74
LITERATURE CITED ..................................................................................................... 75
GLOSSARY ..................................................................................................................... 79
GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS ........................................................................................ 83
APPENDICES .................................................................................................................. 86
iii
DRAFT 02/01/05
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Regional Landscape Ecosystems Sections ....................................................... 11
Figure 2. Michigan land cover. ........................................................................................ 18
Figure 3. A preliminary county-level range map (left) converted to an EMAP hexagon
range map (right). ...................................................................................................... 29
Figure 4. Range and predicted habitat map editing process............................................. 30
Figure 5. Sample MIWildHab logical decision rule for the common gray fox (Urocyon
cinereoargenteus). ..................................................................................................... 32
Figure 6. AML file for the Copper-bellied water snake (Nerodia erythrogaster). ........... 33
Figure 7. Predicted suitable habitat for the Southern flying squirrel (Glaucomys volans).
................................................................................................................................... 34
Figure 8. Predicted suitable habitat for the Black-capped chickadee (Poecile
atricapillus). .............................................................................................................. 35
Figure 9. Predicted suitable habitat for the Blue-spotted salamander (Ambystoma
laterale). .................................................................................................................... 36
Figure 10. Hyper-coverage depicting the total number of amphibian species whose
ranges overlap in each EMAP hexagon contained within Michigan. ....................... 37
Figure 11. Hyper-coverage depicting the total number of reptile species whose ranges
overlap in each EMAP hexagon contained within Michigan. .................................. 38
Figure 12. Hyper-coverage depicting the total number of mammal species whose ranges
overlap in each EMAP hexagon contained within Michigan. .................................. 39
Figure 13. Hyper-coverage depicting the total number of bird species whose ranges
overlap in each EMAP hexagon contained within Michigan. .................................. 40
Figure 14. Amphibian species richness - the total number of amphibian species that are
predicted to have suitable habitat in each 90 m pixel. .............................................. 41
Figure 15. Reptile species richness - the total number of reptile species that are predicted
to have suitable habitat in each 90 m pixel. .............................................................. 42
Figure 16. Mammal species richness - the total number of mammal species that are
predicted to have suitable habitat in each 90 m pixel. .............................................. 43
Figure 17. Bird species richness - the total number of bird species that are predicted to
have suitable habitat in each 90 m pixel. .................................................................. 44
Figure 18. Map of GAP land stewards. ............................................................................ 52
Figure 19. Map of stewardship status. ............................................................................. 53
Figure 20. A comparison of the number of birds that fall into each category of
biodiversity protection when status 3 lands are considered equivalent to status 1 and
2 lands for the protection of biodiversity. ................................................................. 66
Figure 21. A comparison of the number of mammals that fall into each category of
biodiversity protection when status 3 lands are considered equivalent to status 1 and
2 lands for the protection of biodiversity. ................................................................. 67
Figure 22. A comparison of the number of amphibians that fall into each category of
biodiversity protection when status 3 lands are considered equivalent to status 1 and
2 lands for the protection of biodiversity. ................................................................. 68
iv
DRAFT 02/01/05
Figure 23. A comparison of the number of reptiles that fall into each category of
biodiversity protection when status 3 lands are considered equivalent to status 1 and
2 lands for the protection of biodiversity. ................................................................. 69
v
DRAFT 02/01/05
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Michigan expert reviewers. .................................................................................. 5
Table 2. Michigan GAP Land Cover Classification System............................................ 16
Table 3. Square kilometers of the land cover types mapped and the percentage of the
state's total area represented by the mapped type. ..................................................... 19
Table 4. Primary information sources. ............................................................................. 26
Table 5. GIS data layers used in the vertebrate modeling process. .................................. 27
Table 6. References used to check range maps. ............................................................... 28
Table 7. Area in square kilometers (sq. km) for lands in each GAP status level, listed by
steward.. .................................................................................................................... 51
Table 8. Land areas in Michigan with GAP status levels of 1 or 2.................................. 54
Table 9. Land cover types and stewardship status ........................................................... 57
Table 10. Species with 0-<1% of predicted distribution in status 1 and 2....................... 59
Table 11. Species with 1-<10% of predicted distribution in status 1 and 2..................... 60
Table 12. Species with >10% of predicted distribution in status 1 and 2. ....................... 64
vi
DRAFT 02/01/05
LIST OF APPENDICIES
Appendix A. Cross-walk of the National Vegetation Classification System (NVCS) to
the IFMAP/Gap land cover classification system. .................................................... 87
Appendix B. List of terrestrial vertebrate species modeled for MI-GAP, including MIGAP species codes and TNC element codes. ........................................................... 96
Appendix C. Subsets and other intermediate products created from the four main data
layers (Table 5) to speed the MI-GAP vertebrate modeling process. All files are 30
m rasters. ................................................................................................................. 103
Appendix D. List of species subject to expert review and reviewers’ names and
affiliations. Expert reviewers were asked to comment on draft range maps, logical
decision rules, and habitat maps. Reviewer comments are documented in the AML
comment lines for each species. .............................................................................. 106
Appendix E. Cross-walk of the MIWILD-HAB habitat classes to the IFMAP/GAP
habitat classes. Attribute values for the IFMAP land cover are also provided. ..... 114
Appendix F. Table of land cover and stewardship analysis. The area in square kilometers
(multiply by 100 for hectares, 247 for acres) of the land cover mapped by
management status and land steward, and the percent of the land cover total in each
category. .................................................................................................................. 116
Appendix G. Table of amphibian and reptile species distribution and stewardship
analysis. The area in square kilometers (multiply by 100 for hectares, 247 for acres)
of the species' mapped distribution by management status and land steward, and the
percent of the species' total distribution in each category. ...................................... 123
Appendix H. Table of mammal species distribution and stewardship analysis. The area in
square kilometers (multiply by 100 for hectares, 247 for acres) of the species'
mapped distribution by management status and land steward, and the percent of the
species' total distribution in each category. ............................................................. 133
Appendix I. Table of bird species distribution and stewardship analysis. The area in
square kilometers (multiply by 100 for hectares, 247 for acres) of the species'
mapped distribution by management status and land steward, and the percent of the
species' total distribution in each category. ............................................................. 144
Appendix J. List of Example GAP Applications ........................................................... 181
vii
DRAFT 02/01/05
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Michigan Gap Analysis Project started in 1994 as part of the Upper Midwest Gap
Analysis Project (UMGAP). The Upper Midwest GAP Project includes the States of
Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, and Michigan and is coordinated through the United
States Geological Survey’s (USGS) Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center
(UMESC). In Michigan, the State project is coordinated by the Michigan Department of
Natural Resources (DNR). Major cooperators are Michigan State University Department
of Fisheries and Wildlife and the Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI), Michigan
State University Extension.
Michigan contains some of the most biologically diverse and valuable habitat for many
threatened, endangered, and candidate species in the Upper Midwest. Significant habitat
diversity exists here, including oak savanna, jack pine and oak barren, boreal forest,
northern hardwood forests, and dune ecosystems. Michigan has 6 federally threatened
and endangered terrestrial vertebrate species and 1 candidate species for Federal
threatened and endangered status. There are 21 globally imperiled and rare animal species
in Michigan (MNFI 1999).
Information produced by the Michigan GAP Project provides an overview of the
distribution and management status of Michigan’s terrestrial vertebrates and land cover
biodiversity. Gap analysis seeks to identify vegetation types and wildlife species that are
not adequately represented in the current network of conservation areas. These are the
“gaps” in the present-day overall mix of conservation lands and conservation activities.
This information can be used by decision makers for land management planning so that
fewer species become endangered and the number of future conflicts in natural resource
management is reduced.
Gap analysis produces 3 core data layers that are necessary for the assessment of
biodiversity protection. The 3 layers are statewide land cover, land stewardship, and
vertebrate species distributions.
The Michigan GAP land cover layer was derived from the classification of Landsat
satellite imagery. It required 19 scenes to cover all the land area of Michigan. Three
dates of imagery (spring, summer, and fall) were acquired for each scene. Image dates
ranged from 1997 through 2001. Both supervised and unsupervised classification
techniques were used in conjunction with multiple ancillary data sources to produce 32
categories of land cover. An accuracy assessment of the final land cover layer determined
it to be 87 % accurate at level II in the hierarchical classification scheme. At the finest
level of classification detail (level III) class accuracies range from of 36% to 87%.
The Michigan GAP stewardship layer classified conservation lands in Michigan based
upon the existence of an identified management direction for the protection of
biodiversity. This layer was derived through acquisition and analysis of Federal, State,
1
DRAFT 02/01/05
and some land conservancies’ ownership and management records. This data layer
classified land by ownership (Federal, State, Conservancy, and Private) and biodiversity
protection status. Approximately 1.5 percent of Michigan’s land area is classified as a
stewardship level 1 or 2 (highest biodiversity protection status). nineteen point four
percent of the State is classified as stewardship level 3 (some biodiversity protection) and
79.1 percent of the Michigan land area is classified as a level 4 (no plan for the protection
of biodiversity, or unknown).
The Michigan GAP vertebrate species modeling effort produced predicted range and
predicted habitat maps for 22 amphibians, 30 reptiles, 61 mammals, and 214 birds.
Range maps were produced by summarizing the existing literature on the range for each
species to produce a draft range map. The draft range maps were reviewed by experts
who had the opportunity to update the range map based upon the most recent occurrence
data and their expert knowledge. Habitat maps were produced by developing a wildlife
habitat relationship model for each species. Each model relates the life requisites of the
species to GAP land cover classes and other ancillary datasets. The predicted habitat map
for each species was clipped by the predicted range to produce a spatially explicit model
of the location of habitat for a species within its range.
Species richness measured by the number of species present varied geographically for
each of the 4 major taxonomic groups. Amphibian species richness was highest in the
southwest Lower Peninsula. Reptile species richness was highest in the entire southern
Lower Peninsula and the lowest in the Upper Peninsula. Mammal species richness was
highest in the western Upper Peninsula and portions of the northern Lower Peninsula.
Bird species richness was highest in the eastern Upper Peninsula. For birds and
mammals the areas of highest species richness in the state also had relatively large
amounts of public land in stewardship categories 1-3. The species rich areas of the state
for reptiles and amphibians contained very little land in stewardship categories 1, 2, or 3.
Geographic Information System (GIS) analysis of stewardship status for terrestrial
vertebrates showed 60 of 214 (28%) birds, 19 of 61 (31%) mammals, 21 of 30 (70%)
reptiles, and 7 of 22 (32%) amphibians have less than 1% of their predicted distribution
in status 1 or 2 lands. One hundred forty seven of 214 (69%) birds, 42 of 61 (69%)
mammals, 9 of 30 (30%) reptiles, and 15 of 22 (68%) amphibians have between than 1
and 10% of their predicted distribution in status 1 or 2 lands.
Only 7 of 214 (3%) birds, 0 mammals, 0 reptiles, and 0 amphibians have over 10% of
their predicted distribution in status 1 or 2 lands. These 7 species all have limited
predicted distributions and are associated with wetlands or Great Lakes coastal
environments. Status 1 national wildlife refuges in Michigan are principally wetland
dominated environments while status 1 and 2, national lakeshores protect coastal
environments.
It is very clear from the analysis of stewardship status for terrestrial vertebrates that status
1 and status 2 lands (1.5% of Michigan’s landscape) do not afford adequate protection for
2
DRAFT 02/01/05
the complete range of biodiversity elements in Michigan. Status 3 lands (19.4% of
Michigan’s landscape) offer the best opportunity for protecting biodiversity on a public
land base. The Michigan DNR manages 2/3 of Michigan’s status 3 lands and the U.S.
Forest Service manages almost all of the remaining 1/3. If status 3 lands are considered
as offering an equivalent measure of biodiversity protection to status 1 and 2 lands, the
outlook for the conservation of biodiversity in Michigan improves dramatically. Hence,
the challenge for the Michigan DNR and the U. S. Forest Service in Michigan is to
manage their extensive status 3 land base for the protection of the full range of
biodiversity elements.
Gap analysis is a "bottom-up" approach with national guidelines that allow for creativity
and collaboration at the state and local level, where most land management decisions are
made. Common data standards, however, are of enormous importance if ecologically
meaningful information, useful at bioregional and national levels, is to be produced.
Merging Michigan GAP products into a regionally consistent UMGAP data set will allow
for the analysis of wildlife and vegetation relationships across the entire upper Midwest
region. These analyses will provide natural resource managers with the information
necessary to develop ecologically sound conservation strategies at both the local and
regional scale.
3
DRAFT 02/01/05
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
A project of this magnitude could not have been completed without the assistance of
many individuals and groups.
We Thank Amos Eno and the staff of the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, who
funded the early development of the GAP concept and to the originators including J.
Michael Scott, Blair Csuti, and Jack Estes and the pioneering scientists who forged the
way. Thanks to John Mosesso and Doyle Frederick of the USGS Biological Resource
Division (BRD) Office of Inventory and Monitoring, for their support of the national Gap
Analysis Program, especially during its transition from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
to the National Biological Service and then to the USGS BRD. Thanks to Reid Goforth
and the staff at the USGS BRD Cooperative Research Units for administering GAP's
research and development phase from headquarters. Without those mentioned above,
there could not have been a Gap Analysis Program. Thanks also to the staffs of the
National Gap Analysis Program, Center for Biological Informatics, and Biological
Resources Division headquarters.
We acknowledge contributions to this report by Chris Cogan, Patrick Crist, Blair Csuti,
Tom Edwards, Michael Jennings, and J. Michael Scott; as well as the previous GAP
projects.
We would also thank the members of the other state Gap projects that are part of the
Upper Midwest Regional GAP group. We also acknowledge the assistance of Daniel
Fitzpatrick and Pete Joria, of the Upper Midwest Environmental Science Center, for their
coordination of the Regional GAP effort.
Former staff of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources who were major
contributors to the organization and ultimate success of the GAP Project include Dale
Rabe and Alex Weinhagen. Former Michigan Natural Features Inventory staff who
contributed greatly to the project includes Mary Rabe and Lori Peltz-Lewis.
Special thanks to all those involved in the production of the land cover layer. This
includes numerous individuals from Space Imaging Corporation, DNR Forest, Mineral,
and Fire Management Division and the DNR Wildlife Division.
Brett Nelson and Lori Prange-Gregory of the DNR’s Forest, Mineral and Fire
Management Division deserve special thanks for their work on the production of the
stewardship layer.
We acknowledge Robert Doepker, Linda Thomasma, and Scott Thomasma for their
ground breaking work with the development of the MIWildHab wildlife species-habitat
relationship database. MIWildHab information was used as the starting point for almost
all of the species habitat relationship models.
4
DRAFT 02/01/05
We thank Helen Enander, and Kraig Korrock of the Michigan Natural Features Inventory,
Helen developed the initial range maps and provided assistance with Arc Macro
Language (AML) programming, Kraig provided programming for the automation of some
of the analysis. We also thank Yali Li and Marshall Strong, of the DNR Wildlife
Division, for development assistance with AML programming to automate habitat
modeling efforts.
Special thanks are due to the expert reviewers (Table 1.) for the wildlife range mapping
and habitat modeling efforts. They volunteered their expert knowledge and insights to
greatly improve the final GAP products. Any user of Michigan GAP range maps or
habitat maps should read their comments that are incorporated into the AML for each
species.
Table 1. Michigan expert reviewers.
Reviewer Name
Reviewer Affiliation(s)
Ms. Yu Man Lee
Ms. Lori Sargent
Mr. James Harding
Dr. Allen Kurta
Mr. Tim Reis
Dr. Dean Beyer
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan
Mr. Robert Skillen
Dr. Philip Myers
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept. of Zoology
Eastern Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept. of Zoology
Michigan State Univ. Dept. of Zoology
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Central Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan State Univ. Dept. of Fisheries & Wildlife
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan State Univ. Dept. of Fisheries & Wildlife
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
The Nature Conservancy, Michigan Field Office
Mr. Brent Rudolph
Mr. David Cuthrell
Dr. Michael Hamas
Mr. Michael Monfils
Dr. Kelly Millenbah
Mr. Al Stewart
Ms. Nicole Lamp
Mr. Greg Soulliere
Dr. Dave Ewert
We would like to thank Ree Brannon, of the Gap National Office, for helping us through
the process of delivering final products and producing a final report. We also thank Mark
Sargent, Kerry Fitzpatrick, and Matt Herbert of the Michigan DNR, and John Paskus of
the MNFI for reviewing the final report.
5
DRAFT 02/01/05
INTRODUCTION
How This Report is Organized
This report is a summation of a scientific project. While we endeavor to make it
understandable for as general an audience as practicable, it reflects the complexity of the
project it describes. A glossary of terms is provided to aid the reader. For those seeking a
detailed understanding of the subjects, the cited literature should be helpful. The
organization of this report follows the general chronology of project development,
beginning with the production of the individual data layers and concluding with analysis
of the data. It diverges from standard scientific reporting by embedding results and
discussion sections within individual chapters. This was done to allow the individual data
products to stand on their own as testable hypotheses and provide data users with a
concise and complete report for each data and analysis product.
We begin with an overview of the Gap Analysis Program mission, concept, and
limitations. We then present a synopsis of how the current biodiversity condition of the
project area came to be, followed by land cover mapping, animal species distribution
prediction, species richness, and land stewardship mapping and categorization. Data
development leads to the Analysis section, which reports on the status of the elements of
biodiversity (natural communities and animal species) for Michigan. Finally, we describe
the management implications of the analysis results and provide information on how to
acquire and use the data.
The Gap Analysis Program Mission
The mission of the Gap Analysis Program is to prevent conservation crises by providing
conservation assessments of biotic elements (plant communities and native animal
species) and to facilitate the application of this information to land management
activities. This is accomplished through the following five objectives.
1) Map actual land cover as closely as possible to the alliance level (FGDC 1997).
2) Map the predicted distribution of those terrestrial vertebrates and selected other taxa
that spend any important part of their life history in the project area and for which
adequate distributional habitats, associations, and mapped habitat variables are available.
3) Document the representation of natural vegetation communities and animal species in
areas managed for the long-term maintenance of biodiversity.
4) Make all GAP project information available to the public and those charged with land
use research, policy, planning, and management.
5) Build institutional cooperation in the application of this information to state and
regional management activities.
To meet these objectives, it is necessary that GAP be operated at the state or regional
levels but maintain consistency with national standards. Within the state, participation by
6
DRAFT 02/01/05
a wide variety of cooperators is necessary and desirable to ensure understanding and
acceptance of the data and forge relationships that will lead to cooperative conservation
planning.
State Objectives for GAP
The Michigan DNR’s Wildlife Division coordinated the GAP Project and as much as
possible incorporated the development of GAP data layers into the operations of existing
DNR programs. By incorporating GAP into existing DNR programs we hoped there
would be better acceptance of GAP data products by DNR resource managers. Hence,
the stewardship layer was developed by the DNR’s Resource Mapping and Aerial
Photography Section. The land cover was developed as part of the DNR’s Integrated
Forest Monitoring, Assessment, and Prescription (IFMAP) project. The vertebrate
species modeling effort was carried out by the DNR Wildlife Division’s Research Section
and Michigan State University.
The Gap Analysis Concept
The Gap Analysis Program brings together the problem-solving capabilities of federal,
state, and private scientists to tackle the difficult issues of land cover mapping, animal
habitat characterization, and biodiversity conservation assessment at the state, regional,
and national levels. The program seeks to facilitate cooperative development and use of
information. Throughout this report we use the terms "GAP" to describe the national
program, "GAP Project" to refer to an individual state or regional project, and "gap
analysis" to refer to the gap analysis process or methodology.
Much of the following discussion was taken verbatim from Edwards et al. (1995), Scott et
al. (1993), and Davis et al. (1995). The gap analysis process provides an overview of the
distribution and conservation status of several components of biodiversity. It uses the
distribution of actual vegetation and predicted distribution of terrestrial vertebrates and,
when available, invertebrate taxa. Digital map overlays in a GIS are used to identify
individual species, species-rich areas, and vegetation types that are unrepresented or
underrepresented in existing management areas. It functions as a preliminary step to the
more detailed studies needed to establish actual boundaries for planning and management
of biological resources on the ground. These data and results are then made available to
the public so that institutions as well as individual landowners and managers may become
more effective stewards through more complete knowledge of the management status of
these elements of biodiversity. GAP, by focusing on higher levels of biological
organization, is likely to be both cheaper and more likely to succeed than conservation
programs focused on single species or populations (Scott et al.1993).
Biodiversity inventories can be visualized as "filters" designed to capture elements of
biodiversity at various levels of organization. The filter concept has been applied by The
Nature Conservancy, which established Natural Heritage Programs in all 50 states. The
7
DRAFT 02/01/05
Nature Conservancy employs a fine filter of rare species inventory and protection and a
coarse filter of community inventory and protection (Jenkins 1985, Noss 1987). It is
postulated that 85-90% of species can be protected by the coarse filter without having to
inventory or plan reserves for those species individually. A fine filter is then applied to
the remaining 15-10% of species to ensure their protection. Gap analysis is a coarse-filter
method because it can be used to quickly and cheaply assess the other 85-90% of species.
GAP is not designed to identify and aid protection of elements that are rare or of very
restricted distribution; rather it is designed to help "keep common species common" by
identifying risk far in advance of actual population decline. These concepts are further
developed below.
The intuitively appealing idea of conserving most biodiversity by maintaining examples
of all natural community types has never been applied, although numerous approaches to
the spatial identification of biodiversity have been described (Kirkpatrick 1983, Margules
et al. 1988, Pressey and Nicholls 1989, Nicholls and Margules 1993). Furthermore, the
spatial scale at which organisms use the environment differs tremendously among species
and depends on body size, food habits, mobility, and other factors. Hence, no coarse filter
will be a complete assessment of biodiversity protection status and needs. However,
species that fall through the pores of the coarse filter, such as narrow endemics and wideranging mammals, can be captured by the safety net of the fine filter. Community-level
(coarse-filter) protection is a complement to, not a substitute for, protection of individual
rare species.
Gap analysis is essentially an expanded coarse-filter approach (Noss 1987) to biodiversity
protection. The land cover types mapped in GAP serve directly as a coarse filter, the goal
being to assure adequate representation of all native vegetation community types in
biodiversity management areas. Landscapes with great vegetation diversity often are
those with high edaphic variety or topographic relief. When elevational diversity is very
great, a nearly complete spectrum of vegetation types known from a biological region
may occur within a relatively small area. Such areas provide habitat for many species,
including those that depend on multiple habitat types to meet life history needs (Diamond
1986, Noss 1987). By using landscape-sized samples (Forman and Godron 1986) as an
expanded coarse filter, gap analysis searches for and identifies biological regions where
unprotected or underrepresented vegetation types and animal species occur.
More detailed analyses were not part of this project, but are areas of research that GAP as
a national program is pursuing. For example, a second filter could combine species
distribution information to identify a set of areas in which all, or nearly all, mapped
species are represented. There is a major difference between identifying the richest areas
in a region (many of which are likely to be neighbors and share essentially the same list of
species) and identifying areas in which all species are represented. The latter task is most
efficiently accomplished by selecting areas whose species lists are most different or
complementary. Areas with different environments tend to also have the most different
species lists for a variety of taxa. As a result, a set of areas with complementary sets of
species for one higher taxon (e.g., mammals) often will also do a good job representing
8
DRAFT 02/01/05
most species of other higher taxa (e.g., trees, butterflies). Species with large home ranges,
such as large carnivores, or species with very local distributions may require individual
attention. Additional data layers can be used for a more holistic conservation evaluation.
These include indicators of stress or risk (e.g., human population growth, road density,
rate of habitat fragmentation, distribution of pollutants) and the locations of habitat
corridors between wildlands that allow for natural movement of wide-ranging animals
and the migration of species in response to climate change.
General Limitations
Limitations must be recognized so that additional studies can be implemented to
supplement GAP. The following are general project limitations; specific limitations for
the data are described in the respective sections:
1. GAP data are derived from remote sensing and modeling to make general assessments
about conservation status. Any decisions based on the data must be supported by groundverification and more detailed analyses.
2. GAP is not a substitute for threatened and endangered species listing and recovery
efforts. A primary argument in favor of gap analysis is that it seeks to recognize and
manage sites of high biodiversity value for the long-term maintenance of populations of
native species and communities before they become critically rare. Thus, it should help to
reduce the rate at which species require listing as threatened or endangered. Those species
that are already greatly imperiled, however, still require individual efforts to assure their
recovery.
3. GAP data products and assessments represent a snapshot in time generally
representing the date of the satellite imagery. Users of the data must be aware of the static
nature of the products.
4. GAP is not a substitute for a thorough national biological inventory. As a response to
rapid habitat loss, gap analysis provides a quick assessment of the distribution of
vegetation and associated species before they are lost, and provides focus and direction
for local, regional, and national efforts to maintain biodiversity. The process of improving
knowledge in systematics, taxonomy, and species distributions is lengthy and expensive.
That process must be continued and expedited, however, in order to provide the detailed
information needed for a comprehensive assessment of our nation's biodiversity.
Vegetation and species distribution maps developed for GAP can be used to make such
surveys more cost-effective by stratifying sampling areas according to expected variation
in biological attributes.
The Study Area
A Brief Description of Michigan
9
DRAFT 02/01/05
Michigan’s landscape is the product of extensive glacial action during the last Ice Age
10,000 to 15,000 years ago. As the glaciers retreated, bedrock was exposed in some areas
and buried under sand, gravel, clay, and silt in others. The climate modifying effects of
the newly-formed Great Lakes had significant influence on the re-vegetation of the two
peninsulas.
Michigan’s pre-European settlement landscape (Comer et al 1995) was 69% upland
forest, 19% forested swamp, 3.5 % non-forested wetland, 6 % savanna and grassland, 2 %
inland water, and 0.7 % dune and bedrock. Although, relatively small in area compared
to the rest of the State, the Great Lakes Coasts and Dunes are a globally unique
environment. Michigan’s major forest types are generally separated along a latitudinal
gradient. Oak Hickory forest are more common in southern Michigan, the Northern
Hardwoods and Conifer forest are more common in the north with the extreme northern
portions of Michigan supporting some boreal forest types.
The most recent land cover inventory developed by the DNR’s IFMAP project identified
35% of the State in upland forest, 13% in lowland forest, 6.5 % in non-forested wetlands,
25% in agriculture, 10% in upland open land, 5.2% in urban land, 3.2% water, and 1.4%
in bare and sparsely vegetated land.
Although the land cover estimates for Michigan’s pre-European landscape are not directly
comparable on a class-by-class basis because of major differences in how they were
derived (satellite image classification versus interpolation of land surveyor notes), the
major changes in land cover are evident. The State of Michigan was 90% forested preEuropean settlement and is about 50% forested today.
Michigan’s changing landscapes from European settlement to today are better discussed
in the context of Michigan’s Regional Landscape Ecosystems (Albert, 1995) Figure 1.
Most of the following discussion on pre-European settlement and current land cover is
summarized or paraphrased from Albert’s 1995 publication, Regional Landscape
Ecosystems of Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin: A Working Map and Classification.
For a much more detailed description of Michigan’s landscapes, readers should refer to
Albert’s 1995 publication.
10
DRAFT 02/01/05
Figure 1. Michigan’s Regional Landscape Ecosystems Sections (Albert, 1995).
Southern Lower Michigan, Albert’s Section VI, soils are mostly calcareous and loamy.
Southern Michigan’s pre-European settlement landscape consisted primarily of oak
savanna, oak-hickory, and beech-sugar maple forest. This section of Michigan also
supported large areas of tallgrass prairie with wet prairie on the lake plains. Today, this
area of Michigan is farmed heavily for row crops and also contains the most intense
urban, industrial and residential development (Albert, 1995). About 3.5 % of this section
is publicly owned.
11
DRAFT 02/01/05
Northern Lower Michigan, Albert’s Section VII, soils are mostly sands. Pre-European
settlement forest types supported on these soils were northern hardwoods, jack pine
barren, white and red pine forest, and hardwood-conifer and conifer swamp. Following
intensive logging in the late 19th and early 20th century, agriculture was attempted
throughout the section but generally failed on the sandy soils. Today, this section is
mostly forested, with some agriculture. Orchards and vineyards are found along the Lake
Michigan shoreline. This section is a popular vacation destination and has a large
number of second homes. This section is 29 % publicly owned.
The soils of the eastern Upper Peninsula of Michigan, Albert’ Section VIII, are either
poorly-drained sand and clay lake plain supporting extensive areas of peatlands and
swamp forest, or excessively-drained sandy outwash plains. These soils supported a
diverse forest of northern hardwood, jack pine barrens, white pine-red pine forest,
hardwood-conifer swamp, conifer swamp, and muskeg and bogs. After intensive logging,
most of the area returned to forest except the clay lake plains, which are used for pasture
and forage crops. This section is characterized by a low human population density with
47% of the land publicly owned. There are also large areas of private forest land in this
section.
The diversity of landforms in the western Upper Peninsula of Michigan accounts for the
diversity of soils and vegetation. This area is part of Albert’s Section IX, which also
includes parts of Wisconsin and Minnesota. Exposed bedrock knobs, ground and endmoraines, glacial lake plains, and outwash plains are found in this part of Michigan. PreEuropean settlement northern hardwoods were dominated by sugar maple, eastern
hemlock, basswood, and yellow birch, with some white pine. The clay lake plain
supported diverse hardwood-conifer forest of white pine, eastern hemlock, balsam fir,
northern white cedar, trembling aspen, balsam poplar, and paper birch. Forestry is the
principle land use still today. Forests in this region are now much younger with more
early successional types and lack some of the mesic conifer components found in PreEuropean settlement times. This part of Michigan is a popular vacation destination and
consists of large blocks of public (33%) and private forest lands.
12
DRAFT 02/01/05
LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION AND
MAPPING
Introduction
Mapping natural land cover requires a higher level of effort than the development of data
for animal species, agency ownership, or land management, yet it is no more important
for gap analysis than any other data layer. Generally, the mapping of land cover is done
by adopting or developing a land cover classification system, delineating areas of relative
homogeneity (basic cartographic "objects"), then labeling these areas using categories
defined by the classification system. More detailed attributes of the individual areas are
added as more information becomes available, and a process of validating both spatial
pattern and labels is applied for editing and revising the map. This is done in an iterative
fashion, with the results from one step causing re-evaluation of results from another step.
Finally, an assessment of the overall accuracy of the data is conducted. The final
assessment of accuracy will show where improvements should be made in the next update
(Stoms, 1994).
In its "coarse filter" approach to conservation biology (e.g., Jenkins 1985, Noss 1987),
gap analysis relies on maps of dominant natural land cover types as the most fundamental
spatial component of the analysis (Scott et al. 1993) for terrestrial environments. For the
purposes of GAP, most of the land surface of interest (natural) can be characterized by its
dominant vegetation.
Vegetation patterns are an integrated reflection of the physical and chemical factors that
shape the environment of a given land area (Whittaker 1965). They also are determinants
for overall biological diversity patterns (Franklin 1993, Levin 1981, Noss 1990), and they
can be used as a currency for habitat types in conservation evaluations (Specht 1975,
Austin 1991). As such, dominant vegetation types need to be recognized over their entire
ranges of distribution (Bourgeron et al. 1994) for beta-scale analysis (sensu Whittaker
1960, 1977). These patterns cannot be acceptably mapped from any single source of
remotely sensed imagery, therefore, ancillary data, previous maps, and field surveys are
used. The central concept is that the physiognomic and floristic characteristics of
vegetation (and, in the absence of vegetation, other physical structures) across the land
surface can be used to define biologically meaningful biogeographic patterns. There may
be considerable variation in the floristics of subcanopy vegetation layers (community
association) that are not resolved when mapping at the level of dominant canopy
vegetation types (alliance), and there is a need to address this part of the diversity of
nature. As information accumulates from field studies on patterns of variation in
understory layers, it can be attributed to the mapped units of alliances.
Land Cover Classification
13
DRAFT 02/01/05
Land cover classifications must rely on specified attributes, such as the structural features
of plants, their floristic composition, or environmental conditions, to consistently
differentiate categories (Küchler and Zonneveld 1988). The criteria for a land cover
classification system for GAP are:
 an ability to distinguish areas of different actual dominant vegetation;
 a utility for modeling animal species habitats;
 a suitability for use within and among biogeographic regions;
 an applicability to Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) imagery for both rendering a base
map and from which to extract basic land cover patterns (GAP relies on a wide array of
information sources, TM offers a convenient meso-scale base map in addition to being
one source of actual land cover information);
 a framework that can interface with classification systems used by other organizations
and nations to the greatest extent possible; and
 a capability to fit, both categorically and spatially, with classifications of other themes
such as agricultural and urban environments.
For GAP, the system that fits best is referred to as the National Vegetation Classification
System (NVCS) (FGDC 1997). The origin of this system was referred to as the
UNESCO/TNC system (Lins and Kleckner 1996) because it is based on the structural
characteristics of vegetation derived by Mueller-Dombois and Ellenberg (1974), adopted
by the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO
1973) and later modified for application to the United States by Driscoll et al. (1983,
1984). The Nature Conservancy and the Natural Heritage Network (Grossman et al. 1994)
have been improving upon this system in recent years with partial funding supplied by
GAP. The basic assumptions and definitions for this system have been described by
Jennings (1993).
Michigan Gap Analysis Project started before the NVCS was available. The first land
cover mapping effort associated with Michigan GAP was based upon 1993 MRLC
imagery and used the “WISCLAND/Upper Midwest GAP Analysis Image Processing
Protocol”(GAP Protocol), Version 1.5, dated June 18, 1995 (Lillesand et al. 1998) and a
classification system developed by the Michigan DNR. Budget limitations only allowed
the processing of the northern Lower Peninsula. The land cover mapping component of
the Michigan Project was combined in 1998 with a Michigan DNR’s IFMAP project that
had similar land cover mapping goals. This later land cover mapping effort produced the
IFMAP/GAP statewide land cover layer. The classification system for the IFMAP/GAP
land cover map was developed by the Michigan DNR in a series of meetings held around
the State. This system is similar to the NVCS and has been cross-walked to the NVCS
alliance level by Shannon Menard from NATURESERVE (See Appendix A). The
remainder of the final report will only discuss the IFMAP/GAP land cover mapping
effort.
Methods
14
DRAFT 02/01/05
The Michigan IFMAP/GAP land cover layer was produced under contract with Space
Imaging Corporation. The field data collection component of the project required the
participation of DNR field staff. Toward the end of the processing timeline for the land
cover layer, the opportunity arose to cooperate with the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) on their Coastal Change Analysis Program (CCAP). The IFMAP/GAP land cover data products received additional image processing
steps by Space Imaging Corporation to produce a separate NOAA C-CAP land cover
layer. The following section summarizes the development of the land cover layer. A
complete description of the methods used to develop the land cover layer can be found in
the Space Imaging Report “Review of Remote Sensing Technologies used in the IFMAP
Project” (Space Imaging. 2004) available from the Michigan DNR Wildlife Division.
Land Cover Map Development
The land cover map was derived from the classification of Landsat Thematic Mapper
(TM) 5 and 7 imagery. Image dates ranged from 1999 – 2001. In a few small areas, it
was necessary to rely on earlier dates to fill in cloud cover, especially in Michigan’s
Upper Peninsula. Nineteen images are required to cover the entire state. Three dates of
imagery (spring, summer, and fall) were used for each TM scene. In some small areas it
took more than three scenes to fill in areas of cloud cover. The majority of these images
were purchased through the MRLC.
The land cover classification system used to label the map was developed by the DNR
and Space Imaging Corporation. A series of meetings were held around the State with
Michigan DNR field staff. Regional descriptions of the land cover classes provided by
field staff were compared to classes used in past classification efforts such as the MIRIS
system (MDNR 1999), the NVCS and the WISCLAND system. The resulting
classification system contained 32 land cover classes (Table 2).
15
DRAFT 02/01/05
Table 2. Michigan GAP Land Cover Classification System
Grid Code
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
Class Name
Low Intensity Urban
High Intensity Urban
Airports
Roads/Parking Lots
Non-vegetated Farmland
Row Crops
Forage Crops
N/A
Orchards/Vineyards/Nursery
Herbaceous Open Land
N/A
Upland Shrub and Low Density Trees
Parks and Golf Courses
Northern Hardwood
Oaks Types
Aspen Types
Other Upland Deciduous
Mixed Upland Deciduous
Pine Types
Other Upland Conifer
Mixed Upland Conifer
Upland Mixed Forest
Water
Lowland Deciduous Forest
Lowland Coniferous Forest
Lowland Mixed Forest
Floating Aquatic Wetland
Shrub Wetland
Emergent Wetland
Mixed Non-forest Wetland
Sand/Soil
Exposed Rock
Mud Flats
N/A
Other Bare/Sparsely Vegetated
*Note: The grid code values used in Gap will vary from the final values mentioned in the
Space Imaging Report “Review of Remote Sensing Technologies used in the IFMAP
Project.” The class names have remained consistent other than the removal of the Other
Upland Deciduous class.
Training set development for the classification effort utilized 1997 -1999, 1:15840 scale
leaf on aerial photography and USGS 1992 and 1998 Digital Orthophoto Quarter
Quadrangles (DOQQ). This imagery was interpreted by DNR field staff and Space
Imaging staff to develop training site polygons. These polygons were then visited by
DNR field staff to determine the land cover class label.
The image analysis techniques used in production of the map were a combination of
supervised classification and statistical cluster analysis, combined with a modeling
16
DRAFT 02/01/05
approach using existing data sets such as National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) and MIRIS
1978 land cover. Modeling with ancillary data was limited by the quality and vintage of
that data. Models applied to the map included a lowland probability grid designed to
weight areas towards upland or lowland cover types based on NWI and Pre-European
settlement vegetation data, and roads data to model roads into the classification. The three
image dates were used to take advantage of the seasonal differences in vegetation and
land cover. For example, the spring leaf-off image helped delineate wetlands and
separate conifers from broadleaf species. The summer imagery provided a growing
season view of the landscape. The fall imagery was useful for discrimination of
individual broadleaf species. Multiple Landsat images were combined and tonally
balanced to create seasonal image maps of the State of Michigan. These mosaics were
used to perform the majority of the image classification, especially to level II. To
discriminate some of the species associations at level III, unbalanced individual TM
scenes were used, as valuable discriminatory data may have been lost in the image
balancing process.
There is a tremendous amount of heterogeneity in Michigan’s land cover, especially
within the forested land cover types. TM image classification efforts in Michigan result
in cover type maps with a lot of speckle (changes in class from one pixel to the next at a
frequency greater than the actual change in land cover types). To minimize speckle in the
final land cover map, a 3x3 smoothing filter was applied to the map. The smoothing
filter only operated within level II cover type categories. For example, one filter used
operated only on upland deciduous types (northern hardwoods, aspen, oak, and mixed
upland hardwoods). Three other filters were used for upland conifers, lowland forest, and
lowland non-forest.
Results
17
DRAFT 02/01/05
Figure 2. Michigan land cover.
18
DRAFT 02/01/05
Table 3. Square kilometers of the land cover types mapped and the percentage of the
state's total area represented by the mapped type. Water type does not include Great
Lakes.
Land Cover Type
Urban Types (Total)
Low Intensity Urban
High Intensity Urban
Airports
Roads/Parking Lots
Agricultural Types (Total)
Non-vegetated Farmland
Row Crops
Forage Crops
Orchards/Vineyards/Nursery
Open Land Types (Total)
Herbaceous Open Land
Upland Shrub and Low Density Trees
Parks and Golf Courses
Upland Forest (Total)
Northern Hardwood
Oaks Types
Aspen Types
Other Upland Deciduous
Mixed Upland Deciduous
Pine Types
Other Upland Conifer
Mixed Upland Conifer
Upland Mixed Forest
Water
Lowland Forest (Total)
Lowland Deciduous Forest
Lowland Coniferous Forest
Lowland Mixed Forest
Non-Forested Wetlands (Total)
Floating Aquatic Wetland
Shrub Wetland
Emergent Wetland
Mixed Non-forest Wetland
Non-Vegetated Types (Total)
Sand/Soil
Exposed Rock
Mud Flats
Other Bare/Sparsely Vegetated
Total
Area Sq. Km
7,857
2,184
1,405
37
4,232
38,420
237
16,125
21,322
736
15,277
11,033
3,928
315
56,798
17,287
6,270
10,274
163
4,318
8,363
1,491
817
7,814
3,512
17,139
7,314
9,301
523
10,908
445
6,269
1,084
3,110
630
420
22
0
188
150,540
% Total Area of MI
5.22
1.45
0.93
0.02
2.81
25.52
0.16
10.71
14.16
0.49
10.15
7.33
2.61
0.21
37.73
11.48
4.17
6.83
0.11
2.87
5.56
0.99
0.54
5.19
2.33
11.38
4.86
6.18
0.35
7.25
0.30
4.16
0.72
2.07
0.42
0.28
0.01
0.00
0.12
100.00
Thirty two land cover classes were mapped. Upland forest types cover about 38 percent
of the State. Agricultural types cover about 26% of the State. Lowland forests cover
11% of the State and non-forested wetlands cover about 7%. Land cover types are not
19
DRAFT 02/01/05
evenly distributed throughout the state. Forested types dominate the northern Michigan
Landscape while agriculture is the most prevalent land cover type in southern Michigan.
Accuracy Assessment
Introduction
GAP land cover maps are primarily compiled to answer the fundamental question in gap
analysis: what is the current distribution and management status of the nation's major
natural land cover types and wildlife habitats? Besides giving a measure of overall
reliability of the land cover map for Gap Analysis, the assessment also identifies which
general classes or which regions of the map do not meet the accuracy objectives for the
Gap Analysis Program. Thus the assessment identifies where additional effort will be
required when the map is updated. We report the results of the accuracy assessment,
believing that the map is the best map currently available for the project area.
The purpose of accuracy assessment is to allow a potential user to determine the map's
"fitness for use" for their application. It is impossible for the original cartographer to
anticipate all future applications of a land cover map, so the assessment should provide
enough information for the user to evaluate fitness for their unique purpose. This can be
described as the degree to which the data quality characteristics collectively suit an
intended application. The information reported includes details on the database's spatial,
thematic, and temporal characteristics and their accuracy.
Even though we have reached an endpoint in the mapping process where products are
made available to others, the gap analysis process should be considered dynamic. We
envision that maps will be refined and updated on a regular schedule. The assessment
data will be used to refine GAP maps iteratively by identifying where the land cover map
is inaccurate and where more effort is required to bring the maps up to accuracy
standards. In addition, the field sampling may identify new classes that were not
identified during the initial mapping process.
Methods
Accuracy assessment of the land cover types did not involve field visits to verify the
actual land cover. Accuracy assessment efforts utilized existing sources of information or
aerial photo interpretation to determine the field land cover call.
Forested land cover types were assessed using the Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA)
data collected by the U. S. Forest Service. FIA field crews in Michigan have been trained
to collect tree canopy information on FIA plots in the same manner as canopy information
was collected on the land cover training sites.
Because FIA plots locations are placed on a fixed grid, the plot locations did not
necessarily correspond to a group of homogeneous land cover pixels. To adjust for the
20
DRAFT 02/01/05
problems caused by using a pre-determined grid, a 3x3 pixel window was centered on all
FIA plots that had land cover information determined from the canopy calls. If 8 or 9
pixels of the 3x3 window were of a single land cover class in the land cover layer, then
the FIA plot was considered adequate to use for the accuracy assessment. The
implementation of this rule resulted in 789 plots used in the forested land cover type
accuracy assessment.
Accuracy for non-forested land cover types was assessed through the interpretation of
aerial imagery. 1998 color infra-red, and in some cases, 1992 black and white
panchromatic USGS Digital Orthophoto Quadrangles (DOQQ) were used as the source of
photography. Non-forested land cover accuracy assessment points were selected at
random in proportion to their area coverage in the land cover layer. A minimum number
of 50 points were selected per land cover class. The accuracy assessment point had to
have a 3x3 window of homogeneous land cover in order for it to be an acceptable
accuracy assessment point.
A 3x3 pixel window results in an area of 2.4 acres on the ground. Within this area, there
can be more than one cover type. Also, a reliance on aerial imagery interpretation alone
means that it is sometimes impossible to make an exclusive (can only be one land cover
class) interpretation. For example, the difference between two wetland categories may be
very difficult to determine from the photography, especially when their species
composition may only vary by a few percent. Because of these issues, the accuracy
assessment for non-forested types employed a fuzzy assessment methodology (Congalton
and Green, 1999). Fuzzy assessments allow for more than one correct class to be
determined from the ground truth data. When DOQQ interpretations were ambiguous,
fuzzy interpretations were allowed (i.e. more than 1 land cover class could be considered
a correct classification). Sixty five percent of the interpretations or 1,587 out of 2,433
accuracy assessment points for the non-forest types had fuzzy interpretations.
Results
An accuracy assessment of the final land cover layer determined it to be 87 % accurate at
level II in the hierarchical classification scheme. At the finest level of classification detail
(level III, i.e. the class names from Table 2) class accuracies range from of 36% to 87%.
Overall accuracy for the non-forested types is 80.7 percent. Overall accuracy for the
forested types is 67.9 percent. See the Space Imaging Report “Review of Remote
Sensing Technologies used in the IFMAP Project” (Space Imaging. 2004) for a complete
discussion of the accuracy assessment and the accuracy assessment tables.
Limitations and Discussion
Michigan’s current land cover is not only the result of past “natural factors”, such as
glaciers and climate, but also 200 years of “very active management” by humans. This
history has resulted in a landscape with both seemly very discrete, and infinitely
continuous, land cover boundaries. Our land cover mapping efforts required that we put
21
DRAFT 02/01/05
discrete boundaries over the entire landscape. The land cover classification system that
enforces these discrete boundaries was developed by a large group of natural resource
professionals to be useful in the management of Michigan’s natural landscapes. The
limitations of the technology and the sources of error associated with this process are
discussed below.
Congalton and Green (1999), identify all sources of error in the classification process into
one of four categories. These categories are:
1.
Errors in the reference data;
2.
Sensitivity of the classification scheme to observer variability;
3.
Inappropriate technology for mapping specific land cover classes; and
4.
Mapping error.
The Michigan land cover mapping effort relied on many sources of reference data.
Collection of training site data and accuracy assessment points involved a large numbers
of individual observers, hence these efforts were prone to an unknown level of human
error. Also, the land cover classification system relied heavily on human interpretation,
especially in the natural land cover types such as the forested types. Mis-interpretation of
percent canopy composition by tree species probably represented one of our larger
sources of error as it affects both training the image classifier and assessing the accuracy
of the final map.
Michigan forests are a continuous mosaic of tree species in varying composition, size,
and density. The development of the classification system had as a principle goal to
categorize the land cover into meaningful classes for management. Past experience with
the ability of the TM sensor to detect spectral differences among classes was considered,
but was not the primary driver in development of the classification system. The TM
sensor may be an inappropriate technology to separate some of the classes in the
classification system. Hence, inappropriate technology combined with variation in
human interpretations were likely reasons the ability to separate deciduous forest classes
from one another was not very good.
Incorporating other mapped information into the project, such as NWI and previous land
cover mapping efforts helped identify gross inconsistencies in the map, and was an
attempt to minimize mapping error associated with human interpretations, limitations of
the TM sensor, and misapplication of the image classification process. Unfortunately,
most of the additional reference information used had its accuracy assessed. The authors
feel the use of these layers improves the final land cover map, but it is often difficult to
assess their overall impact.
To support wildlife habitat relationship modeling for vertebrates in the State, the authors
feel that the land cover layer represents the best land cover layer available. Users should
consult the accuracy assessment tables in Space Imaging (2004) and the land cover
metadata to help determine how their use of the data will be affected by the accuracy of
the map and the process used to develop the map. In general, the map is appropriate for
22
DRAFT 02/01/05
use in natural resource planning at the large-landscape level. Uses of the map to define
precise boundaries, or the land cover composition of small areas, are more likely to be
negatively affected by the limitations of the technology and the land cover classification
process.
The IFMAP/GAP land cover layer and ancillary data products were used to develop the
NOAA C-CAP land cover layer. This process resulted in the identification of some
improvements that could be made to the original IFMAP/GAP land cover layer. These
improvements were incorporated into the IFMAP/GAP land cover layer after the
completion of all the vertebrate models and the analysis of land cover and stewardship.
These improvements are relatively insignificant on a statewide scale and are summarized
here. Land cover class 17 (other upland deciduous) was recoded to class 18 (mixed
upland deciduous). Class 17 contained a relatively small number of pixels and only
occurred in the southern Lower Peninsula. Some spatial edits were made on the initial
land cover map that in most cases changed some lowland types to other lowland types.
Users who download data from the Michigan Geographic Data Library
(http://www.michigan.gov/cgi) will be downloading the most recent version. For a
complete discussion on the methods used to construct and assess the land cover layer
refer to Space Imaging (2004).
23
DRAFT 02/01/05
PREDICTED ANIMAL SPECIES
DISTRIBUTIONS AND SPECIES
RICHNESS
Introduction
All species range maps are predictions regarding the occurrence of those species within a
particular area (Csuti 1994). Traditionally, the predicted occurrences of most species
begin with samples from collections made at individual point locations. Most species
range maps are small-scale (e.g., >1:10,000,000) and derived primarily from point data to
construct field guides that are suitable, at best, for approximating distribution at the
regional level or counties for example. The purpose of the GAP vertebrate species maps
is to provide more precise information about the current predicted distribution of
individual native species according to actual habitat characteristics within their general
ranges and to allow calculation of predicted area of distributions and associations to
specific habitat characteristics.
GAP maps are produced at a nominal scale of 1:100,000 or better and are intended for
applications at the landscape or "gamma" scale (heterogeneous areas generally covering
1,000 to 1,000,000 hectares and made up of more than one kind of natural community).
Applications of these data to site- or stand-level analyses (site--a microhabitat, generally
10 to 100 square meters; stand--a single habitat type, generally 0.1 to 1,000 ha; Whittaker
1977, see also Stoms and Estes 1993) will likely reveal the limitations of this process.
For some species, it may be necessary to incorporate differences in habitat quality (e.g.,
understory condition) or microhabitat features such as standing dead trees.
Gap analysis uses the predicted distributions of animal species to evaluate their
conservation status relative to existing land management (Scott et al. 1993). However,
the maps of species distributions may be used to answer a wide variety of management,
planning, and research questions relating to individual species or groups of species. In
addition to the maps, great utility may be found in the consolidated specimen collection
records and literature that are assembled into databases used to produce the maps.
Perhaps most importantly, as a first effort in developing such detailed distributions, they
should be viewed as testable hypotheses to be confirmed or refuted in the field. We
encourage biologists and naturalists to conduct such tests and report their findings in the
appropriate literature and to the Gap Analysis Program such that new data may improve
future iterations.
Previous to this effort there were no maps available, digital or otherwise, showing the
likely present-day distribution of species by habitat type across their ranges. Because of
this, ordinary species (i.e., those not threatened with extinction or not managed as game
animals) are generally not given sufficient consideration in land-use decisions in the
context of large geographic regions or in relation to their actual habitats. Their decline,
24
DRAFT 02/01/05
because of incremental habitat loss can, and does, result in one threatened or endangered
species "surprise" after another. Frequently, the records that do exist for an ordinary
species are truncated by state boundaries. Simply creating a consistent spatial framework
for storing, retrieving, manipulating, analyzing, and updating the totality of our
knowledge about the status of each animal species is one of the most necessary and basic
elements for preventing further erosion of biological resources.
Begun in the fall of 2000, MI-GAP terrestrial vertebrate modeling efforts were
undertaken by Michigan State University in cooperation with the Michigan Department
of Natural Resources and Michigan Natural Features Inventory. To predict species
distributions, known ranges were delineated and potential habitat was modeled for all
terrestrial vertebrates known to breed regularly in the state. The objective of MI-GAP
vertebrate modeling was to identify all potentially suitable habitat within a species’
known range in Michigan. MI-GAP products ultimately will be incorporated into
MDNR’s decision-making by state wildlife biologists, foresters, and land managers.
Methods
The terrestrial vertebrate species list generated for MI-GAP was limited to those native
species and non-native game species considered to regularly breed within Michigan.
Species that occur only sporadically in Michigan, or only during the migratory or winter
seasons were not included. In most cases where multiple subspecies are found within the
state, the habitat requirements and ranges of all subspecies were combined and modeled
at the species level; exceptions are noted below (Results). The final species list included
22 amphibians, 29 reptiles, 214 birds, and 60 mammals (Appendix B). The species list
was developed based on the literature cited under each taxonomic group below (Table 4),
the Michigan Natural Features Inventory County Element database, and information
provided by expert reviewers.
Mapping Standards and Data Sources
A statewide 30 m raster of predicted habitat was created for each species on the final
species list (Appendix B). Each pixel contained a value of “1” if our model predicted
potentially suitable habitat within the pixel or “No Data” if it did not. All potentially
suitable habitat was restricted to the current known range of the species within Michigan
(see Mapping Range Extent). These 30 m resolution grids were resampled to 90 m grids
using the nearest neighbor method.
25
DRAFT 02/01/05
Table 4. Primary information sources.
Amphibians
Harding, J.H. and J.A. Holman. 1999. Michigan frogs, toads, and
salamanders. Michigan State University Extension Bulletin E-2350.
Reptiles
Harding, J.H. and J.A. Holman. 1997. Michigan turtles and lizards.
Michigan State University Extension Bulletin E-2234.
Holman, J.A., J.H. Harding, M.M. Hensley, and G.R. Dudderar. 1999.
Michigan snakes. Michigan State University Extension Bulletin E2000.
Birds
Brewer, R., G.A. McPeek, and R.J. Adams, Jr. 1991. The atlas of
breeding birds of Michigan. Michigan State University Press.
Mammals
Kurta, A. 1995. Mammals of the Great Lakes region. University of
Michigan Press.
Predicted habitat was modeled using four main data layers (Table 5). These data layers
are available from the Michigan Geographic Data Library
(http://www.michigan.gov/cgi/). The primary source of habitat information for most
species was the IFMAP/GAP land cover classification map. This map was derived from
30 m resolution LANDSAT satellite imagery and included 32 land cover classes (see
Land Cover Classification and Mapping above). Many models also utilized one or more
of the ancillary data layers described below.
Our primary source of information on wetlands and seasonally wet lowland forests was
the National Wetlands Inventory maps for the state of Michigan. These maps were
digitized by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources and converted from county
level vector coverages to 30 m grids. County level maps were then merged into a
statewide wetlands map (files created by Laurie Prange-Gregory, Michigan Department of
Natural Resources, and Helen Enander, Michigan Natural Features Inventory). To speed
up model computation, several map subsets were created that included only one or a few
wetland classes in each map (e.g., individual statewide maps of all bogs, lowland
conifers, or marshes). All model subsets are described in Appendix C.
Additional hydrological features were modeled using Digital Line Graph (DLG)
hydrography files from the U.S. Geological Survey’s 1:100,000 scale 30- by 60-minute
quadrangle maps. MI-GAP used two DLG coverages: 1) a polygon coverage depicting
lakes/ponds, rapids, islands, reservoirs, sewage disposal ponds, tailings ponds, and large
streams (a.k.a. rivers), and 2) a polyline coverage depicting dams/weirs, ditches/canals,
falls, and streams. These coverages were converted to 30 m resolution ESRI grids and
merged, retaining only the streams, lakes/ponds, and reservoir features (other features had
minimal representation). For species with more specific hydrological habitat
26
DRAFT 02/01/05
requirements, additional subsets of the original hydrology coverages were created. All
model subsets are described in Appendix C.
Some shorebirds and other waterbirds required shoreline habitat that was best modeled
using the Michigan Resource Information System (MIRIS) statewide land cover
classification (MDNR 1999). The MIRIS land cover classification map was derived from
1978 color-infrared aerial photographs and depicts 52 categories of urban, agricultural,
wooded, wetland, and other land cover types. Initial maps were created at the county
level then merged into a statewide file and converted to a 30 m grid.
Table 5. GIS data layers used in the vertebrate modeling process.
Data Layer Name
Source
Description
IFMAP/GAP land
Michigan Department of Natural
32 land cover types.
cover
Resources
Derived from LANDSAT
satellite imagery at 30 m
resolution. 2001.
National Wetlands
Inventory
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
National Wetlands Inventory;
digitized by Michigan Department
of Natural Resources
A classified map of
wetland habitats in
Michigan.
DLG hydrology
U.S. Geological Survey
A DLG of major
hydrological features.
Derived from U.S.
Geological Survey
1:100,000 scale maps.
Michigan Resource
Information System
land cover (MIRIS)
Michigan Department of Natural
Resources
52 land cover types.
Derived from colorinfrared aerial
photographs. 1978.
Mapping Range Extent
Prior to creating maps of predicted species distributions, the range of each species within
Michigan was delineated by county. The main source of information on species’ ranges
was a database created by Scott Thomasma of Two by Two Wildlife Consulting (Grand
Rapids, MI). This database was developed with distributional information from The
Nature Conservancy (TNC) website. Using this database, a coverage was created for
each species. Each county included within a species’ range was given an attribute value of
“1”, while counties outside a species’ range were assigned an attribute value of “0”.
These range maps were checked against the relevant literature (Table 6) and edited when
discrepancies occurred.
27
DRAFT 02/01/05
Table 6. References used to check range maps.
Amphibians
Harding, J.H. 1997. Amphibians and reptiles of the Great Lakes region.
University of Michigan Press.
Harding, J.H. and J.A. Holman. 1992. Michigan frogs, toads, and
salamanders. Michigan State University Extension.
Reptiles
Harding, J.H. 1997. Amphibians and reptiles of the Great Lakes region.
University of Michigan Press.
Holman, A.J. 1990. Michigan turtles and lizards. Michigan State
University Extension.
Holman, A.J., J.H. Harding, M.M. Hensley, and G.R. Dudderar. 1989.
Michigan snakes. Michigan State University Extension.
Birds
Brewer, R., G.A. McPeek, and R.J. Adams, Jr. 1991. The atlas of breeding
birds of Michigan. Michigan State University Press.
Mammals
Baker, R.H. 1983. Michigan mammals. Michigan State University Press.
Hall, R.E. and K.R. Kelson. 1959. The mammals of North America,
Volumes I and II. The Ronald Press Company.
Kurta, A. 1995. Mammals of the Great Lakes region. University of
Michigan Press.
Next, each range map was converted to a coverage composed of equal area (635 km2)
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) hexagons (White et al.
1992). Hexagons were assigned an attribute value of “1” if any part of the hexagon
intersected a county within which the species was present; otherwise the hexagon was
assigned an attribute value of “0” (i.e. species absent; Figure 3). Many range maps were
subject to expert review (Appendix D) and modified accordingly (Figure 4A). Final
range maps were named with a 4-5 letter species code followed by “_hex” (Appendix B).
28
DRAFT 02/01/05
Figure 3. A preliminary county-level range map (left) converted to an EMAP hexagon
range map (right).
Wildlife Habitat Relationships
A database of wildlife habitat relationships for Michigan’s terrestrial vertebrates was
created as part of the MIWildHab software program (Doepker et al. 2001). This database
contains information on wildlife distributions by county, a detailed description of wildlife
habitat requirements, a habitat use matrix, a logical habitat decision rule for querying and
modeling, and citations for literature used to create the database. Habitat classes used in
MIWildHab are based on those found in the Michigan Operation Inventory classification
system (MDNR 1995). Other classes, such as row crops, bottomland hardwoods, and
field/pasture were added to better describe wildlife habitats.
The logical decision rule summarizes one or more suitable combinations of habitat
classes and landscape features that constitute required habitat for the species (Figure 5).
These rules reflect different uses of the habitat (e.g., breeding or foraging); however, the
decision rules contain no assessment of the relative quality of the habitat combinations.
Distribution Modeling
MIWildHab logical decision rules were used to model predicted habitat. When
necessary, the NatureServe database (http://www.natureserve.org) was consulted for
additional information on species habitat requirements. Logical decision rules for many
species were subject to expert review and modified accordingly (Appendix D). For some
species, one habitat alternative was selected as the most likely habitat type found
throughout Michigan; for others, all habitat alternatives were combined into one model.
Microhabitat features included in logical decision rules were not incorporated into current
MI-GAP models due to a lack of suitable data layers. The MIWildHab habitat classes
described in the logical decision rules were cross-walked to the IFMAP/GAP habitat
classes used in the modeling process (see Appendix E).
29
DRAFT 02/01/05
A
B
B
C
Figure 4. Once a range map was reviewed by experts, adjustments were made
accordingly (A). Next, the final range map was overlaid on the draft habitat map (B).
Habitat pixels located outside the known range were clipped to produce the final
predicted habitat map (C).
30
DRAFT 02/01/05
Some models were fairly simple to produce because they were based solely on the
presence of particular vegetation types. However, the habitat requirements of many
species were more complex, requiring the selection of complicated landscape features
(e.g., forest edge or upland habitat adjacent to water). If conditional habitat requirements
such as adjacency were required, we buffered one or more habitat types using the
distance(s) indicated in the logical decision rule. The minimum buffer distance was 30
m, the pixel size of all data layers. For some species the exact distance requirement was
unknown, so we approximated distances using published estimates of either average
movement distances or the diameter of the species’ home range.
After all draft habitat and range maps were created, the maps and the logical decision
rules used to create them were distributed to experts for review and comment (Appendix
D). Some species were not reviewed while others received multiple reviews. Reviewer
comments are documented for each model. After reviews were returned, hexagons were
added or subtracted from species’ ranges based on reviewer comments (Figure 4A).
Logical decision rules were also edited, if necessary, and new habitat maps were created.
In the final stage of the modeling process, statewide potential habitat maps were clipped
with the EMAP hexagon range coverage to produce a map of predicted suitable habitat
within the known range for each species within Michigan (Figure 4). Final habitat maps
were resampled to 90 m coverages using the nearest neighbor method and named with the
species’ unique TNC element code (Appendix B).
31
DRAFT 02/01/05
Common Gray Fox
(Urocyon cinereoargenteus)
Rule:
Mixed Forested/Nonforested Landscapes
Habitat Requirements may be distributed across the
NEIGHBORHOOD
1st alternative:
Savanna
containing:
(Mast and Living Cavity Trees and Dead Down Woody Debris)
2nd alternative:
(Oak (Sm Saw or Lg Saw or Uneven))
or (Assorted Hardwoods (Sm Saw or Lg Saw or Uneven))
or (Northern Hardwoods (Sm Saw or Lg Saw or Uneven))
or (Mixed Upland Hardwoods (Sm Saw or Lg Saw or Uneven))
or (Mixed Northern Hardwoods (Sm Saw or Lg Saw or Uneven))
or (Swamp Hardwoods (Sm Saw or Lg Saw or Uneven))
or (Bottomland Hardwoods (Sm Saw or Lg Saw or Uneven))
or (Mixed Lowland Hardwoods (Sm Saw or Lg Saw or Uneven))
containing:
Figure
5. Sample MIWildHab logical decision rule for the common gray fox (Urocyon
(Mast and Living Cavity Trees and Dead Down Woody Debris)
cinereoargenteus).
neighboring:
(Grass
or Any
Cropland)
Metadata
were
created
for each of the 4 main taxonomic groups (amphibians, reptiles,
and
Upland
Brush
mammals, and birds). In addition, an ARC Macro Language (AML) file (Figure 6) was
created for each species and named with its unique TNC element code (Appendix B).
AML files contain the original model program written for ARC/INFO Version 8.2
(UNIX). Comment lines at the top of each AML file include species names (common
and scientific) and TNC code, expert reviewer names and comments, and any additional
comments from the modelers. All data layers used to create the habitat map are
documented in the AML for each species.
32
/*Copper-bellied water snake
/*Nerodia erythrogaster
DRAFT
02/01/05
/*ARADB22020
/*MIWILD RULE:
/*Bottomland Hardwoods
/*containing Dead Down Woody Debris
/*adjacent to Pond or River
/*REVIEWER'S COMMENTS:
/*Yu Man Lee, Michigan Natural Features Inventory
/*in MI use shrub swamps, ponds, lakes, oxbow sloughs, fens, and slow-moving streams; migrate to permanent
waters using wooded or grassy areas (Harding 1997)
/*not sure dead down woody debris as important as wetland density and diversity
/*note sure Kentucky study applies to MI
/*John Roe (2002) MS Thesis "Comparative ecology of two semi-aquatic snakes, Nerodia sipedon and the
imperiled Nerodia erythrogaster neglecta reported 67% of copperbellies in study (n=15) used 4 or more
wetlands and 47% used 5 or more wetlands; often used small wetlands (<1 ha); overland distance between
wetland shifts >95m; some individuals moved 225-1013m between wetlands but such movements were rare;
copperbellies used upland habitats (forested, open) extensively and hibernated in the uplands primarily (mean
of 53.5m to nearest wetland); at his study site, a buffer zone of 125m from wetlands (not necessary shoreline of
lake or river) would capture 95% of all copperbelly locations; copperbellies often used ephemeral wetlands
/*suggested changes to range based on known occurrences in MNFI's database as of 9/30/03 (based on
counties with known occurrences)
/*NOTES AND COMMENTS ON FINAL MODEL:
/*Supplemented IFMAP imagery with NWI data
/*as suggested by reviewer, selected all marshes and upland habitats (forested, open) within 125m of marshes
/*MODEL CODE:
workspace /data/auk/map
grid
temp1 = ifmaplp IN {29,30}
temp2 = merge(temp1,lpmarsh_g)
temp3 = con(temp2 > 0,1,0)
temp4 = ifmaplp IN {10,12,14,15,16,17,18,22,24,25,26}
temp5 = con(temp4 > 0,1,0)
/*calc distances from marsh and select forested/open areas within <125m of marsh
temp6 = eucdistance(temp3)
temp7 = select(temp6,'value > 0 and value < 125')
temp8 = con(temp7 > 0,1,0)
/*add together
temp9 = temp5 + temp8
temp10 = select(temp9,'value = 2')
temp11 = merge(temp10,temp3)
/data/auk/models/snakes/aradb22020 = con(temp11 > 0,1,0)
quit
&return
Figure 6. AML file for the Copper-bellied water snake (Nerodia erythrogaster).
Results
Mammals
33
DRAFT 02/01/05
Habitat mapping for most mammals was straightforward (see Figure 7 for sample map).
However, bats proved difficult to model due to dependence on roosting sites. Unless
otherwise mentioned in the species text files, only foraging habitat was modeled for bats.
Note that two separate habitat and range maps were created for the deer mouse
(Peromyscus maniculatus) at the suggestion of expert reviewers due to the distinct habitat
requirements of its subspecies. One set of maps (TNC code: AMAFF03040b; range
code: “pemab”) depicts the habitat and range of the subspecies P. m. bairdii. The second
set of maps (TNC code: AMAFF03040g; range code: “pemag”) depicts the combined
habitat and range of the two subspecies P. m. gracilis and P. m. maniculatus (found on
Isle Royale). More details are available in the AML files associated with each species.
N
Figure 7. Predicted suitable habitat for the Southern flying squirrel (Glaucomys volans).
Birds
The habitat requirements and known distributions of birds were perhaps the best
documented of all the MI-GAP taxonomic groups (see Figure 8 for sample map). Note
that the IFMAP/GAP land cover did not contain shoreline or dune land cover classes;
34
DRAFT 02/01/05
therefore, many shore and waterbirds were modeled using the MIRIS land cover map.
MIRIS included several beach, sand, or dune classes derived from classified aerial
photographs.
N
Figure 8. Predicted suitable habitat for the Black-capped chickadee (Poecile
atricapillus).
Reptiles and Amphibians
Habitat modeling for reptiles and amphibians was difficult (see Figure 9 for sample map).
Only limited distribution information was available for many species. Also, many
landscape features required by herpetofauna could not be modeled with the available data
layers (e.g., water depth, temperature, or vernal pool locations). Reptiles and amphibians
depend on microhabitat features that cannot be easily mapped statewide such as downed
logs or suitable hibernacula. Note that two separate habitat and range maps were created
for the eastern fox snake (Elaphe vulpina gloydi; TNC code: ARADB13061; range code:
“elvue”) and the western fox snake (Elaphe vulpina vulpina; TNC code: ARADB13062;
range code: “elvuw”) due to their disjunct distributions.
35
DRAFT 02/01/05
N
Figure 9. Predicted suitable habitat for the Blue-spotted salamander (Ambystoma
laterale).
Species Richness
GAP has often been associated with the mapping of species-rich areas or "hotspots."
Richness maps identify where the same numbers of elements co-occur in the same
geographic locations. (In the case of our data, where numbers of animal species are
mapped for the same grid cells.) These are color coded or shaded in intensity from the
highest numbers of co-occurrence (richness), to the lowest. While we continue to perform
this useful pattern analysis, it is only one of many that may be conducted using the data.
Richest areas may or may not indicate best conservation opportunities. They may occur in
already protected areas or may represent mostly already protected species or those not at
risk. Still, they are often a useful starting point to examine conservation opportunities in
combination with other analyses described in this report's Introduction and in the Analysis
section. We also feel they may be useful for other rewarding applications such as
identifying places of interest for wildlife observation and study.
Two representations of species richness were created for each of the four main taxonomic
groups. The first was a hyper-coverage depicting the total number of species in each
taxon whose ranges overlap in each EMAP hexagon (Figures 10-13).
36
DRAFT 02/01/05
11
13
15
17
19
- 12
- 14
- 16
- 18
- 20
N
Figure 10. Hyper-coverage depicting the total number of amphibian species whose
ranges overlap in each EMAP hexagon contained within Michigan.
37
DRAFT 02/01/05
3-7
8 - 12
13 - 16
17 - 21
22 - 26
N
Figure 11. Hyper-coverage depicting the total number of reptile species whose ranges
overlap in each EMAP hexagon contained within Michigan.
38
DRAFT 02/01/05
22
29
35
42
48
- 28
- 34
- 41
- 47
- 54
N
Figure 12. Hyper-coverage depicting the total number of mammal species whose ranges
overlap in each EMAP hexagon contained within Michigan.
39
DRAFT 02/01/05
100 - 114
115 - 129
130 - 143
144 - 158
159 - 173
N
Figure 13. Hyper-coverage depicting the total number of bird species whose ranges
overlap in each EMAP hexagon contained within Michigan.
40
DRAFT 02/01/05
The second representation of species richness was a set of raster coverages depicting the
number of species that are predicted to have suitable habitat within each 90 m pixel
(Figures 14-17) using the species richness protocol developed by National GAP
(ftp://www.gap.uidaho.edu/scripts/Sprich.zip) and modified for use with coverages
populated by “1” and “No Data” values.
0
1-3
4-7
8 - 10
11 - 14
15 - 18
N
Figure 14. Amphibian species richness - the total number of amphibian species that are
predicted to have suitable habitat in each 90 m pixel.
41
DRAFT 02/01/05
0
1510
15
20
4
9
- 14
- 19
- 24
N
Figure 15. Reptile species richness - the total number of reptile species that are predicted
to have suitable habitat in each 90 m pixel.
42
DRAFT 02/01/05
0
1-8
9 - 17
18 - 25
26 - 34
35 - 43
N
Figure 16. Mammal species richness - the total number of mammal species that are
predicted to have suitable habitat in each 90 m pixel.
43
DRAFT 02/01/05
0
1 - 19
20 - 38
39 - 57
58 - 76
77 - 96
N
Figure 17. Bird species richness - the total number of bird species that are predicted to
have suitable habitat in each 90 m pixel.
Accuracy Assessment
Assessing the accuracy of the predicted vertebrate distributions is subject to many of the
same problems as assessing land cover maps, as well as a host of more serious challenges
related to both the behavioral aspects of species and the logistics of detecting them. These
are described further in the Background section of the GAP Handbook on the national
GAP home page. It is, however, necessary to provide some measure of confidence in the
results of the gap analysis for species collectively, if not individually or by taxonomic
group (comparison to stewardship and management status), and to allow users to judge
the suitability of the distribution maps for their own uses. We, therefore, feel it is
important to provide users with a statement about the accuracy of GAP-predicted
vertebrate distributions within the limitations of available resources and practicalities of
such an endeavor. We acknowledge that distribution maps are never finished products but
are continually updated as new information is gathered. This reflects not only an
improvement over the modeling process, but also the opportunity to map true changes in
44
DRAFT 02/01/05
species distributions over time. However, we feel that assessing the accuracy of the
current maps provides useful information about their reliability to potential users.
Our goal was to produce maps that predict distributions of terrestrial vertebrates and from
that, total species richness and species content with an accuracy of 80% or higher. Failure
to achieve this accuracy indicates the need to refine the data sets and models used for
predicting distribution. There is a conscious effort in the GAP process, however, to err on
the side of commission. In other words, to attribute species as possibly present when they
are not. Few species have systematic, unbiased known ranges and we believe science is
best served by identifying a greater potential for sampling and investigation than a
conservative approach that may miss such opportunities.
Accuracy assessment has not been performed at this time. Field surveys of birds and
small mammals are currently being conducted (summer 2004) on some state lands to
provide limited error-checking information. This information may be used to further
refine bird and small mammal MI-GAP models in the future.
Limitations and Discussion
Before using MI-GAP data, users should note the limitations of these databases, maps,
and models. MI-GAP range and predicted habitat maps are hypotheses about species
distributions that have not been assessed for accuracy. The range and predicted habitat
maps for some species did not go through the expert review process described above
when appropriate experts were not available. We advise users never to substitute MI-GAP
range maps or predicted habitat maps for real environmental survey data. However, we
hope that MI-GAP products will be used to further explore wildlife habitat relationships
and guide the development of large-scale wildlife and land management practices.
Data layers
Our species distribution models were limited by the accuracy and resolution of available
data layers (e.g., land cover/hydrology/wetlands). The IFMAP/GAP land cover map only
distinguished vegetation types, not size or age classes. For many species that require or
prefer only certain size or age classes of vegetation, this likely resulted in our models over
estimating the amount of potential habitat. The inclusive “pines” category of the
IFMAP/GAP land cover map severely limited our ability to model a variety of mammal
and bird species that may require particular species of pines or that may not be found in
pine plantations. Also, agriculture and open land categories are extremely dynamic
classes that can change dramatically from season to season. Due to the large scale at
which this analysis was conducted, microhabitat features such as snags, caves, or percent
cover could not be reasonably mapped. Such microhabitat features may be limiting
factors determining the presence or absence of many species.
The accuracy of range maps may also have limited the predictive ability of our habitat
models. When habitat maps were clipped to the current known range, we assumed that
45
DRAFT 02/01/05
our range maps were as accurate as possible at the scale of the EMAP hexagon.
However, many of our experts acknowledged that surveys for certain species (especially
amphibians and reptiles) have not been conducted uniformly across the state, particularly
on the Lake Michigan islands. Additionally, the range maps may not be accurate
representations of the current range of species. For many species there are no recent
statewide surveys; it is likely that some species have been extirpated from portions of
their depicted range by agriculture and/or urbanization.
Model Limitations
Throughout the vertebrate modeling process, we attempted to err on the side of
commission errors in an effort to identify as much potential habitat as possible. Predicted
habitat maps identify potentially suitable habitat within the known range of the species in
Michigan and may be subject to many caveats such as those stated in each individual
species metadata file. Also, our predicted habitat maps provide no indication of degree of
habitat quality. Habitat maps indicate only whether a pixel is potentially suitable or
unsuitable. For some species both breeding and foraging habitat were combined into one
model, while for others only one of the two types of habitat was selected (see the
individual species AML files). Most habitat models were not restricted to a certain
habitat patch size due to the lack of detailed information about wildlife habitat
requirements. Also, patch connectivity (a dispersal limitation for some species) was not
considered. For more complicated models that required the use of buffers, arbitrary or
best guess distances were often used (and noted in species AML files) when appropriate
literature was unavailable.
Amphibians and Reptiles
The dependence of many amphibians and reptiles on narrow bands of riparian vegetation
and shallow near-shore habitats made their predicted suitable habitat difficult to
accurately depict with the 30 m (and resampled 90 m) resolution coverages.
Mammals
Although a soils data layer was available and could be useful in delineating suitable
habitat for many small mammals, we did not have adequate information linking specific
soil classes to individual species. Bats were a difficult group to adequately model and the
identified suitable habitat is undoubtedly overestimated. Most of the potential habitat
identified for bats is only suitable if appropriate roosting habitat (e.g., roosting trees,
caves, man-made structures) is also available. Without additional site-specific
information on such microhabitat features, the location of suitable bat habitat in Michigan
cannot be reliably identified.
Birds
46
DRAFT 02/01/05
Although birds are generally a well-known and surveyed group, there are some
limitations to the adequacy of the MI-GAP bird models. First, as described above, the
available data layers did not include stand age or size information, which is critical in
correctly identifying suitable habitat for many bird species. Many bird species also
require the juxtaposition of several habitats – “edge” – which was not incorporated into
our models. Finally, we modeled only summer breeding season habitat. Some species
may utilize different wintering or non-breeding habitat within Michigan.
47
DRAFT 02/01/05
LAND STEWARDSHIP
Introduction
To fulfill the analytical mission of GAP, it is necessary to compare the mapped
distribution of biodiversity elements with their representation in different categories of
land ownership and management. As will be explained in the Analysis section, these
comparisons do not measure viability, but are a start to assessing the likelihood of future
threat to a biotic element through habitat conversion--the primary cause of biodiversity
decline. We use the term "stewardship" in place of "ownership" in recognition that legal
ownership does not necessarily equate to the entity charged with management of the
resource, and that the mix of ownership and managing entities is a complex and rapidly
changing condition not suitably mapped by GAP. At the same time, it is necessary to
distinguish between stewardship and management status in that a single category of land
stewardship such as a national forest may contain several degrees of management for
biodiversity.
The purpose of comparing biotic distribution with stewardship is to provide a method by
which land stewards can assess their relative amount of responsibility for the
management of a species or plant community and identify other stewards sharing that
responsibility. This information can reveal opportunities for cooperative management of
that resource, which directly supports the primary mission of GAP to provide objective,
scientific information to decision makers and managers to make informed decisions
regarding biodiversity. It also is not unlikely that a steward that has previously borne the
major responsibility for managing a species may, through such analyses, identify a more
equitable distribution of that responsibility. We emphasize, however, that GAP only
identifies private land as a homogeneous category and does not differentiate individual
tracts or owners, unless the information was provided voluntarily to recognize a longterm commitment to biodiversity maintenance.
After comparison to stewardship, it is also necessary to compare biotic occurrence to
categories of management status. The purpose of this comparison is to identify the need
for change in management status for the distribution of individual elements or areas
containing high degrees of diversity. Such changes can be accomplished in many ways
that do not affect the stewardship status. While it will eventually be desirable to identify
specific management practices for each tract, and whether they are beneficial or harmful
to each element, GAP currently uses a scale of 1 to 4 to denote relative degree of
maintenance of biodiversity for each tract. A status of "1" denotes the highest, most
permanent level of maintenance, and "4" represents the lowest level of biodiversity
management, or unknown status. This is a highly subjective area, and we recognize a
variety of limitations in our approach, although we maintain certain principles in
assigning the status level. Our first principle is that land ownership is not the primary
determinant in assigning status. The second principle is that while data are imperfect, and
all land is subject to changes in ownership and management, we can use the intent of a
land steward as evidenced by legal and institutional factors to assign status. In other
48
DRAFT 02/01/05
words, if a land steward institutes a program backed by legal and institutional
arrangements that are intended for permanent biodiversity maintenance, we use that as the
guide for assigning status.
The characteristics used to determine status are as follows:
 Permanence of protection from conversion of natural land cover to unnatural (humaninduced barren, exotic-dominated, arrested succession);
 Relative amount of the tract managed for natural cover;
 Inclusiveness of the management, i.e. single feature or species versus all biota; and
 Type of management and degree that it is mandated through legal and institutional
arrangements.
The four status categories can generally be defined as follows (after Scott et al. 1993,
Edwards et al. 1995, Crist et al. 1995):
Status 1: An area having permanent protection from conversion of natural land cover and
a mandated management plan in operation to maintain a natural state within which
disturbance events (of natural type, frequency, and intensity) are allowed to proceed
without interference or are mimicked through management.
Status 2: An area having permanent protection from conversion of natural land cover and
a mandated management plan in operation to maintain a primarily natural state, but which
may receive use or management practices that degrade the quality of existing natural
communities.
Status 3: An area having permanent protection from conversion of natural land cover for
the majority of the area, but subject to extractive uses of either a broad, low-intensity type
or localized intense type. It also confers protection to federally listed endangered and
threatened species throughout the area.
Status 4: Lack of irrevocable easement or mandate to prevent conversion of natural
habitat types to anthropogenic habitat types. Allows for intensive use throughout the tract.
Also includes those tracts for which the existence of such restrictions or sufficient
information to establish a higher status is unknown.
Mapping Standards
The Michigan GAP Stewardship layer was developed by the Resource Mapping and
Aerial Photography Section of the Forest, Mineral, and Fire Management Division of the
DNR. Information to compile the layer was obtained from the Federal land management
agencies within the State, the Michigan DNR, and the Nature Conservancy.
Methods
Stewardship Mapping
49
DRAFT 02/01/05
The minimum mapping unit (mmu) used to develop this layer was 40 acres or the quarter
quarter section of the Public Land Survey System (PLSS). This mmu was chosen
because most of the land ownership records used to delineate DNR ownership boundaries
were recorded by PLSS quarter quarter sections.
Michigan DNR land ownership was mapped by downloading ownership records from the
DNR’s Realestate Information System (REIS). REIS provided tabular information on
DNR ownership. The PLSS Town, Range, Section, and Quarter Quarter fields from
REIS were used to link the tabular DNR ownership information to a GIS coverage of the
PLSS for the State of Michigan. This process created a GIS coverage of DNR ownership.
The determination of the land stewards for DNR ownership occurred through an overlay
of the DNR’s Facilities Coverage that identifies the type of DNR facility (State Forest,
State Park, State Game Area, etc.).
Michigan has three national forests, the Ottawa National Forest, the Hiawatha National
Forest, and the Huron-Manistee National Forest. The Ottawa and Hiawatha provided GIS
coverages of their ownership boundaries. The Huron-Manistee National Forest provided
a GIS coverage of the Huron side of the Forest. At the time of the Stewardship Layer
compilation, the Manistee Forest did not have a GIS coverage of their boundary. The
DNR compiled the Manistee side of the Huron-Manistee Forest ownership boundary by
analyzing Rockford Plat Maps (Rockford Map Publishers, 1999) and attributing the PLSS
quarter quarter sections within the Forest.
National wildlife refuge boundaries were provided by the US Fish and Wildlife Service
for all refuges in Michigan except the Wyndotte Refuge (a new and extremely small
refuge).
The National Park Service provided boundaries for the two national lakeshores in
Michigan: Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lake Shore, and Pictured Rocks National
Lakeshore. Isle Royal National Park Boundary was delineated by the DNR using
information from existing DNR GIS coverages.
The Nature Conservancy provided boundaries for all of their preserves.
Although land owned by other State and Federal agencies, land conservancies, and local
units of government would have been desirable to include in the GAP Stewardship layer,
it was determined that the usefulness of this information was not worth the additional
cost. We estimate that the GAP Stewardship layer accounts for over 98% of public
ownership in the State.
Management Status Categorization
Management status categorization of status 1 and status 2 areas occurred through analysis
of records and personal communication with managers responsible for the stewardship of
50
DRAFT 02/01/05
the areas (Table 8). Status 3 areas were determined from existing management plans
and/or the mission of the managing agencies. Most of the National Forest and State
Forest are classified as status 3 areas. We did not map the boundaries of status 4 areas.
Those areas of Michigan not mapped as status 1, 2, or 3 are considered status 4 areas
because we lack information to make a management status determination.
Results
The following tables present summary statistics of stewardship and management
categories in the state. We begin by comparing representation of various stewardship
categories in management status categories. Table 7 provides information on the
proportional make-up of management status categories by steward and vice-versa, so that
land stewards can see the degree their lands generally contribute to biodiversity
maintenance.
Steward
U.S. Forest Service
U.S. National Park Service
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Michigan DNR
State of Michigan
The Nature Conservancy
Other
Total
Status 1
0
Status 2
0
Status 4
0
0
Status 3
11483.6
7.6%
153.1
0.1%
38.1
0.0%
17226.6
11.4%
303.0
0.2%
0
570.6
0.4%
380.8
0.3%
314.6
0.2%
0
374.6
0.2%
0
61.7
0.0%
0
0
0
888.3
0.6%
29204.4
19.4%
117790
78.2%
119129.9
79.1%
1327.7
0.9%
513.7
0.3%
0
0
0
17
1322.9
0.9%
0
Total
11483.6
7.6%
1098.3
0.7%
418.9
0.3%
18071.9
12.0%
1625.9
1.1%
61.7
0.0%
117790
78.2%
150550.3
100.0%
Table 7. Area in square kilometers (sq. km) for lands in each GAP status level, listed by
steward. Percentages for each category and steward are based upon total land area in the
State.
51
DRAFT 02/01/05
Figure 18. Map of GAP land stewards.
52
DRAFT 02/01/05
Figure 19. Map of stewardship status.
53
DRAFT 02/01/05
Table 8. Land areas in Michigan with GAP status levels of 1 or 2.
Name of Status 1&2 Areas / Size (sq. km)
Michigan State Parks / 828.3
Isle Royale National Park / 570.6
Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore / 121.8
Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore / 253.1
Seney (and Islands) National Wildlife Refuges /
380.7
The Nature Conservancy Preserves / 61.7
Established
Mar. 1931
1966
Oct. 1970
1935
Steward
MI DNR
U.S. NPS
U.S. NPS
U.S. NPS
U.S. FWS
The Nat. Cons.
Limitations and Discussion
This map is a compilation of ownership maps provided by a variety of sources that are
individually responsible for their accuracy. It was created solely for the purpose of
conducting the analyses described in this report and is not suitable for locating boundaries
on the ground or determining precise area measurements of individual tracts.
The categorization of GAP status level 2 on National Forest and State Forest is an
underestimate because of the lack of available information at the time of data compilation
on the boundaries of relatively small areas that have formal dedication as Wilderness or
Natural Areas. The impact of this underestimate on the analysis of biodiversity protection
across the entire State is, in the opinion of the authors, miniscule.
54
DRAFT 02/01/05
ANALYSIS BASED ON STEWARDSHIP
AND MANAGEMENT STATUS
Introduction
This chapter describes the method and results of the gap analysis as used by the Gap
Analysis Program. As described in the general introduction to this report, the primary
objective of GAP is to provide information on the distribution and status of several
elements of biological diversity. Although GAP "seeks to identify habitat types and
species not adequately represented in the current network of biodiversity management
areas" (Gap Analysis Program, 2000), it is unrealistic to create a standard definition of
"adequate representation" for either land cover types or individual species (Noss et al.
1995).
A practical solution to this problem is to report both percentages and absolute area of
each element in biodiversity management areas and allow the user to determine which
types are adequately represented in natural areas. There are many other factors that
should be considered in such determinations such as:
 historic loss or gain in distribution;
 nature of the spatial distribution;
 immediate versus long term risk; and
 degree of local adaptation among populations of the biotic elements that are worthy of
individual conservation consideration.
Such analyses are beyond the scope of this project, but we encourage their application
coupled with field confirmation of the mapped distributions.
Currently, land cover types and terrestrial vertebrates are the primary focus of GAP's
mapping efforts, however, other components of biodiversity, such as aquatic organisms or
selected groups of invertebrates may be incorporated into GAP distributional data sets.
Where appropriate, GAP data may also be analyzed to identify the location of a set of
areas in which most or all land cover types or species are predicted to be represented. The
use of "complementarity" analysis, that is, an approach that additively identifies a
selection of locations that may represent biodiversity rather than "hot spots of species
richness" may prove most effective for guiding biodiversity maintenance efforts. Several
quantitative techniques have been developed recently that facilitate this process (see
Pressey et al. 1993, Williams et al. 1996, Csuti et al. 1997, for details). These areas
become candidates for field validation and may be incorporated into a system of areas
managed for the long-term maintenance of biological diversity.
The network of Conservation Data Centers (CDCs) and Natural Heritage Programs
(NHPs) established cooperatively by The Nature Conservancy and various state agencies
maintain detailed databases on the locations of rare elements of biodiversity. GAP
cooperatively uses these data to develop predicted distributions of potentially suitable
55
DRAFT 02/01/05
habitat for these elements, which may be valuable for identifying research needs and
preliminary considerations for restoration or reintroduction. Conservation of such
elements, however, is best accomplished through the fine-filter approach of the above
organizations as described in the introduction. It is not the role of GAP to duplicate or
disseminate Heritage Program or CDC Element Occurrence Records. Users interested in
more specific information about the location, status, and ecology of populations of such
species are directed to their state Heritage Program or CDC.
Methods
The gap analysis is accomplished by first producing: maps of land cover (see Figure 2),
predicted distributions for selected animal species (see Figure 7), and land stewardship
and management status (see Figure 19). The intersection of the land stewardship map
with the maps of the elements of biodiversity (land cover and vertebrates) produces tables
summarizing the distribution of each element in different land stewardship and
management categories.
The summarization of stewardship for each of the elements of biodiversity was
accomplished with the use of the Summary command in ERDAS Imagine. Results of the
Summary command were exported to Microsoft Excel to create tables. All summaries
used 90m versions of the vertebrate distribution, land cover, and stewardship grids.
Results
The data are provided in a format that allows users to carry out inquiries about the
representation of each element in different land stewardship and management categories
as appropriate to their own management objectives. This forms the basis of GAP's
mission to provide land owners and managers with the information necessary to conduct
informed policy development, planning, and management for biodiversity maintenance.
As a coarse indicator of the status of the elements, we provide a breakdown along five
levels of representation (0-<1%, 1-<10%, 10-<20%, and 20-<50%; >=50%). The <1%
level indicates those elements with essentially none of their distribution in a protected
status while levels of 10%, 20%, and 50% have been recommended in the literature as
necessary amounts of conservation (Noss and Cooperrider 1994; Noss 1991; Odum and
Odum 1972; Specht et al. 1974; Ride 1975; Miller 1994).
Land Cover Analysis
Table 9 summarizes land cover type by stewardship status. Appendix F is a complete
table of land cover type by land steward and stewardship status. For example, Appendix
F reveals that 2.26% of Northern Hardwood forests are classified as status 1 and 2, and
25% are classified as status 3. The management responsibility for status 3 Northern
56
DRAFT 02/01/05
Hardwoods is split about equally between the U.S. Forest Service and the Michigan
DNR.
Table 9. Land cover types and stewardship status.
Land Cover Type
Urban Types (Total)
Low Intensity Urban
High Intensity Urban
Airports
Roads/Parking Lots
Agricultural Types (Total)
Non-vegetated Farmland
Row Crops
Forage Crops
Orchards/Vineyards/Nursery
Open Land Types (Total)
Herbaceous Open Land
Upland Shrub and Low Density Trees
Parks and Golf Courses
Upland Forest (Total)
Northern Hardwood
Oaks Types
Aspen Types
Other Upland Deciduous
Mixed Upland Deciduous
Pine Types
Other Upland Conifer
Mixed Upland Conifer
Upland Mixed Forest
Water
Lowland Forest (Total)
Lowland Deciduous Forest
Lowland Coniferous Forest
Lowland Mixed Forest
Non-Forested Wetlands (Total)
Floating Aquatic Wetland
Shrub Wetland
Emergent Wetland
Mixed Non-forest Wetland
Non-Vegetated Types (Total)
Sand/Soil
Exposed Rock
Mud Flats
Other Bare/Sparsely Vegetated
Total
Status 1
ha
%
177 0.02
23 0.01
12 0.01
0 0.00
142 0.03
272 0.01
0 0.00
113 0.01
159 0.01
0 0.00
3,580 0.23
1,016 0.09
2,564 0.65
0 0.00
70,750 1.25
17,226 1.00
1,442 0.23
28,509 2.77
2 0.01
302 0.07
6,726 0.80
6,519 4.37
386 0.47
9,637 1.23
6,804 1.94
15,580 0.91
651 0.09
12,882 1.38
2,046 3.91
34,924 3.20
954 2.14
13,154 2.10
2,067 1.91
18,748 6.03
482 0.76
101 0.24
332 15.25
0 0.00
49 0.26
132,569 0.88
Stewardship (ha)
Status 3
ha
%
27,195 3.46
4,519 2.07
731 0.52
153 4.17
21,792 5.15
20,335 0.53
200 0.85
7,368 0.46
12,133 0.57
634 0.86
254,658 16.67
151,663 13.75
102,905 26.20
91 0.29
1,721,129 30.30
433,525 25.08
169,484 27.03
323,493 31.49
1,469 9.01
48,169 11.16
400,518 47.89
55,786 37.41
32,357 39.58
256,327 32.80
28,490 8.11
524,196 30.59
135,388 18.51
371,469 39.94
17,339 33.13
340,407 31.21
9,649 21.66
184,975 29.51
16,333 15.07
129,450 41.62
4,004 6.35
2,829 6.73
15 0.71
17 91.30
1,142 6.07
2,920,414 19.40
Status 2
ha
%
2,959 0.38
743 0.34
346 0.25
15 0.42
1,855 0.44
3,686 0.10
21 0.09
751 0.05
2,798 0.13
116 0.16
7,853 0.51
6,101 0.55
1,726 0.44
26 0.08
44,091 0.78
21,889 1.27
2,965 0.47
5,879 0.57
45 0.27
2,022 0.47
5,385 0.64
319 0.21
889 1.09
4,698 0.60
5,482 1.56
11,946 0.70
3,655 0.50
7,793 0.84
498 0.95
7,750 0.71
315 0.71
4,100 0.65
644 0.59
2,691 0.87
5,014 7.96
4,577 10.89
24 1.12
0 0.00
412 2.19
88,780 0.59
Status 4
ha
755,391
213,071
139,388
3,502
399,430
3,817,675
23,450
1,604,248
2,117,122
72,855
1,261,583
944,529
285,622
31,432
3,843,790
1,256,095
453,147
669,558
14,782
381,266
423,623
86,495
48,116
510,707
310,437
1,162,130
591,692
537,983
32,455
707,706
33,630
424,647
89,322
160,107
53,522
34,513
1,805
2
17,201
11,912,234
%
96.14
97.58
99.23
95.41
94.38
99.37
99.07
99.49
99.29
98.98
82.58
85.61
72.71
99.63
67.68
72.66
72.27
65.17
90.70
88.31
50.66
58.00
58.86
65.36
88.39
67.81
80.90
57.84
62.01
64.88
75.49
67.74
82.43
51.48
84.93
82.13
82.92
8.70
91.48
79.13
Status 1 and 2
Total Hectares
ha
%
3,136 0.40
785,722
765 0.35
218,355
358 0.25
140,477
15 0.42
3,671
1,997 0.47
423,219
3,958 0.10
3,841,968
21 0.09
23,671
864 0.05
1,612,480
2,957 0.14
2,132,212
116 0.16
73,606
11,433 0.75
1,527,675
7,117 0.65
1,103,308
4,291 1.09
392,818
26 0.08
31,549
114,841 2.02
5,679,760
39,116 2.26
1,728,736
4,407 0.70
627,039
34,388 3.35
1,027,439
47 0.29
16,297
2,324 0.54
431,759
12,111 1.45
836,252
6,838 4.59
149,119
1,275 1.56
81,748
14,335 1.83
781,370
12,286 3.50
351,213
27,525 1.61
1,713,852
4,306 0.59
731,386
20,675 2.22
930,128
2,544 4.86
52,338
42,674 3.91
1,090,787
1,269 2.85
44,548
17,255 2.75
626,876
2,711 2.50
108,366
21,439 6.89
310,996
5,496 8.72
63,021
4,679 11.13
42,021
356 16.37
2,177
0 0.00
19
461 2.45
18,804
221,349 1.47
15,053,997
As explained above, we provide results according to thresholds of representation
advocated in the literature to conserve biodiversity. The values in the table will allow
users to set any desirable threshold to identify elements requiring more protection
according to their criteria. The following summaries highlight potential gaps and
conservation needs; Appendix F provides figures of stewardship representation for all
land cover types by land steward and management status.
Land Cover with 0 - <1% representation in GAP status 1 and 2:
The urban and agricultural types fall into this category as expected. With only one and a
half percent of Michigan in status 1 and 2, some of the more natural land cover types also
fall into this category. Most significant to biodiversity conservation is the fact that open
land cover types have less than one percent representation in status 1 and 2. Most status 1
and status 2 lands in Michigan are in the Upper Peninsula. The Upper Peninsula of
Michigan is mostly forested.
Land Cover with 1% - <10% representation in GAP status 1 and 2:
57
DRAFT 02/01/05
Most other natural land cover types fall into this category. As a group, the upland forest,
lowland forest, non-forested wetlands, and non-vegetated groups are all in this category.
Looking within the non-vegetated group it is interesting to note that the Sand/Soil class
and Exposed Rock class both exceed 10 percent representation.
Land Cover with l0% - <20% representation in GAP status 1 and 2:
The Sand/Soil class and Exposed Rock class fall into this category. These cover types
represent habitat unique to the Michigan Great Lakes shoreline. Past recognition of their
global importance resulted in a larger percent of these cover types set aside as protected
areas.
Land Cover with 20% - <50% representation in GAP status 1 and 2:
There are no land cover types in this category
Land Cover with at least 50% representation in GAP status 1 and 2:
There are no land cover types in this category.
Limitations and Discussion for Land Cover Analysis
Assessing the conservation status of natural land cover is limited by several confounding
factors. GAP has typically found the accuracy of the mapped distributions of natural
communities at the floristic (e.g., alliance) level to be substantially lower and more
variable than that of animal distributions. Any aggregation of biotic units (e.g., above
species) is a surrogate for species or lower levels of biotic organization and will underrepresent conservation need (Pressey and Logan 1995). Also, we cannot distinguish the
degree of natural condition or value of the mapped units due to management
manipulation, exotic invasion, or spatial configuration. Considering an aggregation of
species (i.e. a land cover type) to be sufficiently represented in existing conservation areas
cannot be determined solely by the percentage of the type represented because the land
cover type has unmapped variation in species composition that we could not measure.
Until individual plant species distributions can be mapped, it is not possible to assure that
the full range of vegetation biodiversity is represented, and surrogates must be used.
Predicted Animal Species Distributions Analysis
A summary table is not provided due to the large number of species analyzed, but some
generalizations and examples of species results by the various thresholds are provided
below. The complete Animal Species Distributions Analysis Tables found in Appendix G
(reptiles and amphibians), Appendix H (mammals), and Appendix I (birds), provides the
area in square kilometers (multiply by 100 for hectares, 247 for acres) of the species'
mapped distribution by management status and land steward, and the percent of the
species' total distribution in each category. For example, a typical entry may indicate that
58
DRAFT 02/01/05
Cooper’s hawk has 12,293 km2 of potential habitat in Michigan DNR lands that are
ranked status 3, representing 16.7% of that species' total distribution.
Species with 0 - <1% of predicted distribution in status 1 or 2:
Table 10 shows 60 of 214 (28%) birds, 19 of 61 (31%) mammals, 21 of 30 (70%)
reptiles, and 7 of 22 (32%) amphibians have less than 1% of their predicted distribution
in status 1 or 2 lands.
Table 10. Species with 0-<1% of predicted distribution in status 1 and 2.
Birds
%
Mammals
%
Reptiles and Amphibians
%
Sharp-tailed grouse
0.00
Smoky shrew
0.00
Six-lined racerunner
0.00
Peregrine falcon
0.04
Elk
0.03
Western lesser siren
0.15
Cattle egret
0.06
Least shrew
0.16
Blue racer
0.30
Purple martin
0.12
Prairie vole
0.22
Fowler's toad
0.32
Northern rough-winged swallow
0.12
Indiana bat
0.28
Blanchard's cricket frog
0.36
Cliff swallow
0.13
Least weasel
0.30
Butler's garter snake
0.37
Bobolink
0.14
American badger
0.31
Smallmouth salamander
0.38
Eastern meadowlark
0.14
Star-nosed mole
0.32
Kirtland's snake
0.40
Northern bobwhite
0.15
Thirteen-lined ground squirrel
0.34
Western chorus frog
0.41
Western meadowlark
0.15
Eastern fox squirrel
0.40
Eastern hog-nosed snake
0.45
Horned lark
0.20
Meadow vole
0.42
Black rat snake
0.46
Northern mockingbird
0.22
Eastern mole
0.55
Eastern massasauga rattlesnake
0.47
Ring-necked pheasant
0.22
Eastern cottontail
0.56
Copper-bellied water snake
0.48
Vesper sparrow
0.23
Deer mouse (bairdii)
0.64
Northern ribbon snake
0.51
Killdeer
0.26
Southern flying squirrel
0.69
Brown snake
0.59
Chimney swift
0.28
Striped skunk
0.74
Eastern box turtle
0.61
Loggerhead shrike
0.29
Woodchuck
0.84
Spotted turtle
0.65
House finch
0.30
Virginia opossum
0.86
Queen snake
0.66
Grasshopper sparrow
0.31
Woodland vole
0.87
Spiny softshell
0.67
Henslow's sparrow
0.31
Five-lined skink
0.69
Sedge wren
0.32
Red-eared slider
0.75
Upland sandpiper
0.34
Common musk turtle
0.77
Wild turkey
0.35
Marbled salamander
0.77
Kirtland's warbler
0.35
Eastern milk snake
0.80
Long-eared owl
0.35
Eastern fox snake
0.81
Ring-billed gull
0.37
Common map turtle
0.86
Yellow-breasted chat
0.38
Eastern tiger salamander
0.86
Eastern bluebird
0.40
Smooth green snake
0.86
Worm-eating warbler
0.42
Willow flycatcher
0.45
Carolina wren
0.46
Hooded warbler
0.47
Acadian flycatcher
0.48
White-eyed vireo
0.49
Blue-winged warbler
0.49
Prothonotary warbler
0.51
Great egret
0.51
59
DRAFT 02/01/05
Louisiana waterthrush
0.53
Cerulean warbler
0.53
Eastern screech-owl
0.63
Common moorhen
0.68
Common nighthawk
0.68
Barn swallow
0.69
Orchard oriole
0.71
Song sparrow
0.72
Yellow-throated warbler
0.73
Clay-colored sparrow
0.74
Dickcissel
0.76
American goldfinch
0.77
Eastern towhee
0.77
Short-eared owl
0.82
Tufted titmouse
0.82
Field sparrow
0.89
American coot
0.89
Bank swallow
0.91
Blue-gray gnatcatcher
0.91
Whip-poor-will
0.93
Mallard
0.96
Sandhill crane
0.97
Tree swallow
0.98
Species with 1% - <10% of predicted distribution in status 1 or 2:
Table 11 shows 147 of 214 (69%) birds, 42 of 61 (69%) mammals, 9 of 30 (30%)
reptiles, and 15 of 22 (68%) amphibians have between than 1 and 10% of their predicted
distribution in status 1 or 2 lands.
Table 11. Species with 1-<10% of predicted distribution in status 1 and 2.
Birds
%
Mammals
%
Reptiles and Amphibians
%
Red-bellied woodpecker
1.04
Coyote
1.05
Green frog
1.31
American woodcock
1.07
White-tailed deer
1.05
American toad
1.34
Yellow-throated vireo
1.09
Northern short-tailed shrew
1.05
Spotted salamander
1.37
Northern harrier
1.11
Red fox
1.06
Bullfrog
1.38
Turkey vulture
1.13
Common gray fox
1.09
Westen fox snake
1.48
Rusty blackbird
1.16
American beaver
1.12
Wood turtle
1.53
Northern cardinal
1.20
White-footed mouse
1.16
Northern red-bellied snake
1.60
American crow
1.20
Common raccoon
1.18
Four-toed salamander
1.67
Savannah sparrow
1.21
Meadow jumping mouse
1.22
Blanding's turtle
1.69
American robin
1.25
Black bear
1.27
Redback salamander
1.72
American kestrel
1.27
Eastern gray squirrel
1.33
Northern ring-necked snake
1.77
Baltimore oriole
1.30
Southern bog lemming
1.40
Mudpuppy
1.84
Golden-winged warbler
1.38
American marten
1.41
Eastern garter snake
1.91
Red-headed woodpecker
1.38
Bobcat
1.44
Blue-spotted salamander
2.01
Red-eyed vireo
1.38
Least chipmunk
1.50
Gray treefrog
2.02
Northern pintail
1.39
Masked shrew
1.50
Northern water snake
2.07
60
DRAFT 02/01/05
Brown-headed cowbird
1.39
Northern flying squirrel
1.52
Eastern newt
2.10
Red-winged blackbird
1.40
Woodland jumping mouse
1.56
Wood frog
2.31
Wilson's phalarope
1.41
Eastern pipistrelle
1.58
Northern spring peeper
2.37
Eastern kingbird
1.41
Eastern chipmunk
1.63
Pickerel frog
2.68
Black-crowned night-heron
1.41
Red squirrel
1.67
Northern leopard frog
2.85
Chipping sparrow
1.48
Water shrew
1.78
Painted turtle
3.44
Yellow warbler
1.48
Long-tailed weasel
1.85
Snapping turtle
3.80
Eastern phoebe
1.49
Little brown bat
1.89
Mink frog
7.73
Pine warbler
1.49
Big brown bat
1.89
Wood thrush
1.51
Eastern red bat
1.90
Red-tailed hawk
1.56
Silver-haired bat
1.92
Warbling vireo
1.57
Northern myotis
1.94
Mourning dove
1.59
Hoary bat
1.94
Dark-eyed junco
1.59
Ermine
1.98
Cedar waxwing
1.60
Pygmy shrew
2.02
Chestnut-sided warbler
1.63
Fisher
2.06
Ruby-throated hummingbird
1.63
Common porcupine
2.10
House wren
1.63
Southern red-backed vole
2.34
Pileated woodpecker
1.64
Snowshoe hare
2.35
Barred owl
1.65
Deer mouse (gracilis)
2.81
Eastern wood-pewee
1.67
Gray wolf
3.04
White-breasted nuthatch
1.71
Arctic shrew
3.15
Scarlet tanager
1.71
Mink
3.21
Rose-breasted grosbeak
1.71
Northern river otter
3.97
Great crested flycatcher
1.72
Muskrat
5.68
Northern waterthrush
1.74
Moose
6.84
Brown thrasher
1.76
Blue jay
1.76
Northern flicker
1.77
Belted kingfisher
1.80
Red-shouldered hawk
1.84
Downy woodpecker
1.84
Indigo bunting
1.85
Prairie warbler
1.86
Cooper's hawk
1.90
Great horned owl
1.90
Hairy woodpecker
1.90
Blue-headed vireo
1.92
Yellow-billed cuckoo
1.92
Hooded merganser
1.92
American redstart
1.93
Blackburnian warbler
1.94
Black-capped chickadee
1.94
Brown creeper
1.96
Evening grosbeak
1.96
Veery
1.97
Ovenbird
1.98
Mourning warbler
1.98
Hermit thrush
1.98
61
DRAFT 02/01/05
Brewer's blackbird
2.05
Nashville warbler
2.07
Least flycatcher
2.08
Black-throated green warbler
2.09
Broad-winged hawk
2.09
Pine siskin
2.10
Black-billed cuckoo
2.11
Purple finch
2.12
Sharp-shinned hawk
2.12
Bald eagle
2.14
Northern shoveler
2.14
Double-crested cormorant
2.15
Red-breasted nuthatch
2.16
Golden-crowned kinglet
2.16
Gray catbird
2.17
Ruby-crowned kinglet
2.17
Black-and-white warbler
2.18
Tennessee warbler
2.19
Canada warbler
2.20
Yellow-bellied sapsucker
2.21
Northern saw-whet owl
2.22
White-throated sparrow
2.22
Wood duck
2.24
Northern goshawk
2.24
Common merganser
2.27
Osprey
2.28
Olive-sided flycatcher
2.29
Swainson's thrush
2.32
American black duck
2.34
Cape May warbler
2.35
Yellow-rumped warbler
2.40
Black-throated blue warbler
2.41
Forster's tern
2.43
Winter wren
2.45
Magnolia warbler
2.46
Green heron
2.48
Great blue heron
2.51
Yellow-bellied flycatcher
2.51
Pied-billed grebe
2.52
Red crossbill
2.52
Red-breasted merganser
2.62
Common raven
2.63
Northern parula
2.67
Common loon
2.72
Blue-winged teal
2.72
Canada goose
2.85
Spruce grouse
2.87
Common snipe
2.91
Gray jay
2.94
62
DRAFT 02/01/05
Lincoln's sparrow
2.95
Common grackle
2.96
Palm warbler
3.05
Philadelphia vireo
3.06
Bay-breasted warbler
3.07
White-winged crossbill
3.08
Great gray owl
3.09
Ruffed grouse
3.14
Boreal chickadee
3.18
Common goldeneye
3.22
Herring gull
3.22
Ruddy duck
3.25
Alder flycatcher
3.33
Swamp sparrow
3.42
Black-backed woodpecker
3.45
Common tern
3.65
Merlin
3.78
Common yellowthroat
3.79
Green-winged teal
3.90
Connecticut warbler
3.96
American bittern
4.12
Caspian tern
4.34
Ring-necked duck
4.72
Gadwall
5.05
Sora
5.08
Trumpeter swan
5.17
Wilson's warbler
5.33
Red-necked grebe
5.55
Marsh wren
6.21
American wigeon
6.71
Black tern
7.28
Virginia rail
7.34
Le Conte's sparrow
8.49
Species with l0% - <20% of predicted distribution in status 1 or 2:
Table 12 shows 5 of 214 (2%) birds, 0 mammals, 0 reptiles, and 0 amphibians have
between than 10 and 20% of their predicted distribution in status 1 or 2 lands. These 5
species all have limited predicted distributions and are associated with wetland or Great
Lakes coastal environments. Status 1 national wildlife refuges in Michigan are
principally wetland dominated environments while status 1 and 2, national lakeshores
protect coastal environments.
63
DRAFT 02/01/05
Table 12. Species with >10% of predicted distribution in status 1 and 2.
Birds
%
Least bittern
11.06
King rail
11.76
Yellow-headed blackbird
11.82
Spotted sandpiper
15.70
Redhead
18.63
Yellow rail
27.36
Piping plover
30.73
Mammals
%
Reptiles and Amphibians
%
Species with 20% - <50% of predicted distribution in status 1 or 2:
Table 12 shows 2 of 214 (1%) birds, 0 mammals, 0 reptiles, and 0 amphibians have
between than 20 and 50% of their predicted distribution in status 1 or 2 lands. The
Yellow rail has a small (70,525 ha) predicted distribution that significantly overlaps the
Seney National Wildlife Refuge. The Piping plover’s extremely small predicted
distribution (7,735 ha) overlaps significantly with the Sleeping Bear Dunes and Pictured
Rocks National Lakeshores and coastal Michigan DNR State Parks.
Species with at least 50% representation in GAP status 1 and 2:
There are no species in this category
Analysis of State Endemics
There are two State endemic birds, the Great Lakes Piping plover which is discussed
above, and the Kirtland’s warbler. The Kirtland’s warbler is associated with young,
dense jackpine stands. The primary range of the Kirtland’s warbler is the central portion
of Michigan’s northern Lower Peninsula. Most currently occupied Kirtland’s warbler
habitat is intensively managed by either the Michigan DNR or the United States Forest
Service. Less than 1% of warbler habitat is in status 1 and 2 areas. The current predicted
distribution is 70% status 3 lands.
Eco-Regional Analysis
The majority (72%) of Michigan’s status 1 and 2 lands are located in Michigan’s Upper
Peninsula (Albert’s Section VIII and IX, see Figure 19). Michigan’s status 3 lands are
well distributed across the Upper Peninsula and the northern Lower Peninsula (Albert’s
Section VII) and comprise most of the public land base in these forest dominated
landscapes. The southern Lower Peninsula (Albert’s Section VI) is 97% status 4 land in a
primarily agricultural and urban landscape.
Species with predicted distributions in the northern part of Michigan generally have more
of their predicted distribution in status 1 and 2 lands. Reptiles, as a taxonomic group,
64
DRAFT 02/01/05
have more species in southern Michigan (Figure 3.9) which helps explain why 70% of
reptiles have less than 1% of their predicted distribution in status 1 and 2 lands.
Limitations and Discussion
When applying the results of our analyses, it is critical that the following limitations are
considered: 1) the limitations described for each of the component parts (land cover
mapping, animal species mapping, stewardship mapping) of the analyses; 2) the spatial
and thematic map accuracy of the components; and 3) the suitability of the results for the
intended application (see Appropriate and Inappropriate Use below).
One point is very clear in the stewardship analysis. Status 1 and status 2 lands in
Michigan comprise 1.5% of Michigan’s landscape and do not afford adequate protection
for the complete range of biodiversity elements in Michigan. Status 3 land comprises
19.4% of Michigan’s landscape, and offers the best opportunity for protecting
biodiversity on a public land base. The Michigan DNR manages 2/3 of Michigan’s status
3 lands and the U.S. Forest Service manages almost all of the remaining 1/3.
If status 3 lands are considered as offering an equivalent measure of biodiversity
protection to status 1 and 2 lands and add the percentage of predicted distribution in
status 3 lands to the previous analysis of vertebrate biodiversity, the outlook for the
conservation of biodiversity in Michigan improves dramatically. Figures 20, 21, 22, and
23 depict the potential impact of status 3 lands on the protection of vertebrate biodiversity
in Michigan.
65
DRAFT 02/01/05
Birds
160
140
number of species
120
100
Status 1-2
Status 1-3
80
60
40
20
0
0-1
1-10
10-20
20-30
30-40
40-50
>50
% of predicted distribution
Figure 20. A comparison of the number of birds that fall into each category of
biodiversity protection when status 3 lands are considered equivalent to status 1 and 2
lands for the protection of biodiversity.
66
DRAFT 02/01/05
Mammals
45
40
35
number of species
30
25
Status 1-2
Status 1-3
20
15
10
5
0
0-1
1-10
10-20
20-30
30-40
40-50
>50
% of predicted distribution
Figure 21. A comparison of the number of mammals that fall into each category of
biodiversity protection when status 3 lands are considered equivalent to status 1 and 2
lands for the protection of biodiversity.
67
DRAFT 02/01/05
Amphibians
16
14
number of species
12
10
Status 1-2
Status 1-3
8
6
4
2
0
0-1
1-10
10-20
20-30
30-40
40-50
>50
% of predicted distribution
Figure 22. A comparison of the number of amphibians that fall into each category of
biodiversity protection when status 3 lands are considered equivalent to status 1 and 2
lands for the protection of biodiversity.
68
DRAFT 02/01/05
Reptiles
25
number of species
20
15
Status 1-2
Status 1-3
10
5
0
0-1
1-10
10-20
20-30
30-40
40-50
>50
% of predicted distribution
Figure 23. A comparison of the number of reptiles that fall into each category of
biodiversity protection when status 3 lands are considered equivalent to status 1 and 2
lands for the protection of biodiversity.
Status 4 lands in Michigan also provide significant habitat for a diversity of wildlife and
contribute to the conservation picture in Michigan. Michigan has 8,963 sq. km of
Commercial Forest Act (CFA) lands. Ninety eight percent of CFA lands are located in
the Upper Peninsula. Private land habitat programs associated with the 2002 Farm Bill
impact over 139,600 hectares primarily in southern Michigan (M. Sargent, personal
communication).
69
DRAFT 02/01/05
CONCLUSIONS AND MANAGEMENT
IMPLICATIONS
Before settlement by Europeans, Michigan was a state dominated by vast forests,
wetlands and grasslands. Massive deforestion, followed by extensive drainage,
agriculture and urban development, and in some regions, eventual reforestation has given
modern Michigan three distinctive regional characters.
Deforestion, wetland drainage, and the plowing of grasslands in the Southern Lower
Peninsula created valuable agriculture lands. This landscape is still dominated by
agriculture and the cities that grew to support agriculture and industry. There is very
little public ownership in this part of the State, making private land habitat management
programs critical to the protection of southern Michigan biodiversity. Most of the public
land base is administered by the Michigan DNR in the form of State Game Areas, State
Parks, and State Recreation Areas. Management of the public land is important as these
State Game and Recreation Areas are the only relatively large blocks of forested habitat
in the southern Michigan landscape. Land use planning emphasizing the conservation
and restoration of large blocks of natural landscapes will be important for the long term
protection of biodiversity in this region.
Massive deforestation in the northern Lower Peninsula and Upper Peninsula was
followed by catastrophic fires that depleted soil nutrients over much of this region. Early
efforts at developing a strong agricultural presence in this part of Michigan failed because
of the predominance of nutrient-poor sandy soils. The repeating pattern of failed
agriculture and tax reversion in the late 1800s and early 1900s resulted in the “land that
nobody wanted” (Titus 1945). Much of this land eventually became part of Michigan’s
current public land base.
The large public land base and the numerous lakes and streams, combined with the
relative close proximity to the large urban centers, quickly made the northern Lower
Peninsula a prime recreation destination in Michigan. This area of the State has seen
rapid population growth over the last few decades.
There are great demands on the public land base in the northern Lower Peninsula for
timber, oil and gas, and recreation. With 30% of the land base in public ownership
(mostly status 3), the greatest public land management challenge will be maintaining the
full suite of biodiversity on these status 3 lands while still satisfying the intense demands
for multiple resource values. One of the biggest challenges facing private land
management is habitat fragmentation caused by a long-term trend towards smaller
ownership parcels.
The Upper Peninsula remains a land of vast forest and wetlands with limited agricultural
activities. The mining industry that developed in this region after European settlement is
70
DRAFT 02/01/05
mostly gone. Relatively small urban centers are found along the Great Lakes shoreline.
This region of the State has the largest public land base (40%). It also contains large
amounts of industrial forest land. With a low human population density this area is home
to a recovering wolf population.
The Upper Peninsula contains most of the status 1 and 2 lands in Michigan, but these
lands comprise only 3.5% of the regional landscape. The management of status 3 lands
(State and National Forest) for the full range of biodiversity is a critical conservation
challenge in this region. Conservation partnerships like EUPPEM (Eastern Upper
Peninsula Partners in Ecosystem Management) provide the opportunity to improve the
management of both public and private lands, especially commercial forest lands, in this
relatively undeveloped region of the State.
The Michigan Gap Analysis Project quantifies much of what we suspected are the
biodiversity conservation challenges and opportunities in Michigan. The data layers and
models are the first step at looking at the full range of biodiversity conservation in
Michigan. As information on species/habitat relationships improves, combined with an
ever increasing capability to describe the vegetative and structural composition of the
landscape, the models that form the basis of GAP will improve. The regional and
statewide approaches to biodiversity conservation as represented in the Michigan DNR by
regional ecosystem management teams, the EUPPEM group, the LIP program, the
Wildlife Conservation Strategy, the Old Growth and Biodiversity Stewardship
Committee, and the Biodiversity Atlas Project will be best served by the current GAP
products.
71
DRAFT 02/01/05
PRODUCT USE AND AVAILABILITY
How to Obtain the Products
It is the goal of the Gap Analysis Program and the USGS Biological Resources Division
(BRD) to make the data and associated information as widely available as possible. Use
of the data requires specialized software called Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
and substantial computing power. Additional information on how to use the data or
obtain GIS services is provided below and on the GAP home page (URL below). While a
CD-ROM of the data will be the most convenient way to obtain the data, it may also be
downloaded via the Internet from the national GAP home page at:
http://www.gap.uidaho.edu/
The home page will also provide, over the long term, the status of our state's project,
future updates, data availability, and contacts. Within a few months of this project's
completion, CD-ROMs of the final report and data should be available at a nominal cost.
See the above home page for ordering information. Michigan Gap Analysis Project
information can be obtained by visiting the following website:
http://www.fw.msu.edu/labs/gap/home.htm
Disclaimer
Following is the official Biological Resources Division (BRD) disclaimer as of 29
January 1996, followed by additional disclaimers from GAP. Prior to using the data, you
should consult the GAP home page (see How to Obtain the Data, above) for the current
disclaimer.
Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the BRD,
no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the accuracy or utility of the data on
any other system or for general or scientific purposes, nor shall the act of distribution
constitute any such warranty. This disclaimer applies both to individual use of the data
and aggregate use with other data. It is strongly recommended that these data are directly
acquired from a BRD server [see above for approved data providers] and not indirectly
through other sources which may have changed the data in some way. It is also strongly
recommended that careful attention be paid to the content of the metadata file associated
with these data. The Biological Resources Division shall not be held liable for improper
or incorrect use of the data described and/or contained herein.
These data were compiled with regard to the following standards. Please be aware of the
limitations of the data. These data are meant to be used at a scale of 1:100,000 or smaller
(such as 1:250,000 or 1:500,000) for the purpose of assessing the conservation status of
animals and vegetation types over large geographic regions. The data may or may not
72
DRAFT 02/01/05
have been assessed for statistical accuracy. Data evaluation and improvement may be
ongoing. The Biological Resources Division makes no claim as to the data's suitability for
other purposes. This is writable data which may have been altered from the original
product if not obtained from a designated data distributor identified above.
Appropriate and Inappropriate Use of These Data
All information is created with a specific end use or uses in mind. This is especially true
for GIS data, which is expensive to produce and must be directed to meet the immediate
program needs. For GAP, minimum standards were set (see A Handbook for Gap
Analysis, Scott et al. 1993) to meet program objectives.
Recognizing, however, that GAP would be the first, and for many years likely the only,
source of statewide biological GIS maps, the data were created with the expectation that
they would be used for other applications. Therefore, we list below both appropriate and
inappropriate uses. This list is in no way exhaustive but should serve as a guide to assess
whether a proposed use can or cannot be supported by GAP data. For most uses, it is
unlikely that GAP will provide the only data needed, and for uses with a regulatory
outcome, field surveys should verify the result. In the end, it will be the responsibility of
each data user to determine if GAP data can answer the question being asked, and if they
are the best tool to answer that question.
Scale
First we must address the issue of appropriate scale to which these data may be applied.
The data were produced with an intended application at the eco-region level, that is,
geographic areas from several hundred thousand to millions of hectares in size. The data
provide a coarse-filter approach to analysis, meaning that not every occurrence of every
plant community or animal species habitat is mapped; only larger, more generalized
distributions were mapped. The data are also based on the USGS 1:100,000 scale of
mapping in both detail and precision. When determining whether to apply GAP data to a
particular use, there are two primary questions: do you want to use the data as a map for
the particular geographic area, or do you wish to use the data to provide context for a
particular area? The distinction can be made with the following example: You could use
GAP land cover to determine the approximate amount of oak woodland occurring in a
county, or you could map oak woodland with aerial photography to determine the exact
amount. You then could use GAP data to determine the approximate percentage of all oak
woodland in the region or state that occurs in the county, and thus gain a sense of how
important the county's distribution is to maintaining that plant community.
Appropriate Uses
The above example illustrates two appropriate uses of the data: as a coarse map for a
large area such as a county, and to provide context for finer-level maps. Specific casestudy examples are provided in Appendix J, but following is a general list of applications:
73
DRAFT 02/01/05
 Statewide biodiversity planning;
 Regional (Councils of Government) planning;
 Regional habitat conservation planning;
 County comprehensive planning;
 Large-area resource management planning;
 Coarse-filter evaluation of potential impacts or benefits of major projects or plan
initiatives on biodiversity, such as utility or transportation corridors, wilderness
proposals, regional open space and recreation proposals, etc.;
 Determining relative amounts of management responsibility for specific biological
resources among land stewards to facilitate cooperative management and planning;
 Basic research on regional distributions of plants and animals and to help target both
specific species and geographic areas for needed research;
 Environmental impact assessment for large projects or military activities;
 Estimation of potential economic impacts from loss of biological resource-based
activities; and
 Education at all levels and for both students and citizens.
Inappropriate Uses
It is far easier to identify appropriate uses than inappropriate ones, however, there is a
"fuzzy line" that is eventually crossed when the differences in resolution of the data, size
of geographic area being analyzed, and precision of the answer required for the question
are no longer compatible. Examples include:
 Using the data to map small areas (less than thousands of hectares), typically
requiring mapping resolution at 1:24,000 scale and using aerial photographs or ground
surveys;
 Combining GAP data with other data finer than 1:100,000 scale to produce new
hybrid maps or answer queries;
 Generating specific area measurements from the data finer than the nearest thousand
hectares (minimum mapping unit size and accuracy affect this precision);
 Establishing exact boundaries for regulation or acquisition;
 Establishing definite occurrence or non-occurrence of any feature for an exact
geographic area (for land cover, the percent accuracy will provide a measure of
probability);
 Determining abundance, health, or condition of any feature;
 Establishing a measure of accuracy of any other data by comparison with GAP data;
 Altering the data in any way and redistributing them as a GAP data product; and
 Using the data without acquiring and reviewing the metadata and this report.
74
DRAFT 02/01/05
LITERATURE CITED
Albert, D. A. 1995. Regional Landscape Ecosystems of Michigan, Minnesota, and
Wisconsin: A Working Map and Classification (Fourth Revision: July 1994).
Lansing, MI: Michigan Natural Features Inventory . Report number 1995-01. 250pp.
GIS coverage approximate map scale 1:100,000.
Austin, M.P. 1991. Vegetation: Data collection and analysis. Pages 37-41 in C.R.
Margules and M.P. Austin, editors, Nature conservation: Cost effective biological
surveys and data analysis. Australia CSIRO, East Melbourne.
Bourgeron, P.S., H.C. Humphries, R.L. DeVelice, and M.E. Jensen. 1994. Ecological
theory in relation to landscape and ecosystem characterization. Pages 58-72 in M.E.
Jensen and P.S. Bourgeron, editors, Ecosystem management: Principles and
applications, Volume II. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-318. USDA Forest Service,
Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon. 376 pp.
Comer, P. J., D. A. Albert, H.A. Wells, B. L. Hart, J.B. Raab, D. L. Price, D. M. Kashian,
R. A. Corner, and D. W. Schuen. 1995. Vegetation circa 1800 of Michigan.
Michigan's Native Landscape: As Interpreted from the General Land Office Surveys
1816-1856. Michigan Natural Features Inventory. Lansing, MI. 78 pp. + digital map
Congalton, R. G. and K. Green. 1999. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data:
principals and practices. CRC Press, Inc. 137pp.
Crist, P., B. Thompson, and J. Prior-Magee. 1995. A dichotomous key of land
management categorization, unpublished. New Mexico Cooperative Fish and Wildlife
Research Unit, Las Cruces, New Mexico.
Csuti, B., S. Polasky, P.H. Williams, R.L. Pressey, J.D. Camm, M. Kershaw, A.R.
Kiester, B. Downs, R. Hamilton, M. Huso, and K. Sahr. 1997. A comparison of
reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon. Biological
Conservation 80:83-97
Csuti, B. 1994. Methods for developing terrestrial vertebrate distribution maps for Gap
Analysis (version 1). In J.M. Scott and M.D. Jennings, editors. A handbook for Gap
Analysis. Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Idaho,
Moscow.
Davis, F.W., P.A. Stine, D.M. Stoms, M.I. Borchert, and A.D. Hollander. 1995. Gap
Analysis of the actual vegetation of California - 1. The southwestern region. Madroño
42:40-78.
Diamond, J. 1986. The design of a nature reserve system for Indonesian New Guinea.
Pages 485-503 in M.E. Soulé, editor. Conservation biology: The science of scarcity
and diversity. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
Doepker, R.V., L.E. Thomasma, and S.A. Thomasma. 2001. MIWildHab – Michigan
Wildlife Habitats [Computer Program]. MDNR, Wildlife Division, Lansing MI and
Two by Two Wildlife Consulting, Grand Rapids MI.
Driscoll, R.S., D.L. Merkel, D.L. Radloff, D.E. Snyder, and J.S. Hagihara. 1984. An
ecological land classification framework for the United States. Miscellaneous
Publication 1439. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC.
75
DRAFT 02/01/05
Driscoll, R.S., D.L. Merkel, J.S. Hagihara, and D.L. Radloff. 1983. A component land
classification for the United States: Status report. Technical Note 360. U.S.
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Denver, Colorado.
Edwards, T.C., Jr., C.H. Homer, S.D. Bassett, A. Falconer, R.D. Ramsey, and D.W.
Wight. 1995. Utah Gap Analysis: An environmental information system. Technical
Report 95-1, Utah Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Utah State
University, Logan, Utah.
Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC). 1994. Content standards for digital
geospatial metadata. 8 June 1994. Federal Geographic Data Committee, Washington,
DC.
Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC). 1995. Content standards for digital
geospatial metadata workbook, Federal Geographic Data Committee, Washington,
DC.
Federal Geographic Data Committee (FDGC) Vegetation Subcommittee. 1997. FGDC
Vegetation Classification and Information Standards--June 3, 1996 Draft. FGDC
Secretariat, Reston, Virginia. 35 pp.
Forman, R.T.T., and M. Godron. 1986. Landscape ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New
York.
Franklin, J.F. 1993. Preserving biodiversity: Species, ecosystems, or landscapes?
Ecological Applications 3(2):202-205.
Gap Analysis Program. 2000. A handbook for conducting Gap Analysis. USGS Gap
Analysis Program, Moscow, Idaho. http://www.gap.uidaho.edu/gap/handbook.
Grossman, D., K.L. Goodin, X. Li, C. Wisnewski, D. Faber-Langendoen, M. Anderson,
L. Sneddon, D. Allard, M. Gallyoun, and A. Weakley. 1994. Standardized national
vegetation classification system. Report by The Nature Conservancy and
Environmental Systems Research Institute for the NBS/NPS Vegetation Mapping
Program. National Biological Service, Denver, Colorado.
Jenkins, R.E. 1985. Information methods: Why the Heritage Programs work. The Nature
Conservancy News 35(6):21-23.
Jennings, M.D. 1993. Natural terrestrial cover classification: Assumptions and
definitions. Gap Analysis Technical Bulletin 2. Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife
Research Unit, University of Idaho, Moscow.
Kirkpatrick, J.B. 1983. An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of
nature reserves: An example from Tasmania. Biological Conservation 25:127-134.
Küchler, A.W., and I.S. Zonneveld, editors. 1988. Vegetation mapping. Kluwer
Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 635 pp.
Levin, S.A. 1981. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1942-1968.
Lillesand, T., J. Chipman, D. Nagel, H. Reese, M. Bobo, and R. Goldman. 1998. Upper
Midwest Gap analysis program image proccessing protocol. Report prepared for the
U.S. Geological Survey, Environmental Management Technical Center, Onalaska,
Wisconsin, June 1998. EMTC 98-G001. 25 pp. +Appendices A-C.
Lins, K.S., and R.L. Kleckner. 1996. Land cover mapping: An overview and history of
the concepts. Pages 57-65 in J.M. Scott, T.H. Tear, and F. Davis, editors, Gap
Analysis: A landscape approach to biodiversity planning. American Society for
Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, Maryland.
76
DRAFT 02/01/05
Margules, C.R., A.O. Nicholls, and R.L. Pressey. 1988. Selecting networks of reserves to
maximize biological diversity. Biological Conservation 43:63-76
Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR). 1995. Operations Inventory Field
Manual. Forest Management Division.
Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR). 1999. Michigan Resource
Information System (MIRIS). MDNR 1978 Landuse/Cover. Land Cover / Use
Inventory. Lansing, Michigan: MDNR. Land cover interpreted from aerial
photography.
Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI). 1999. Michigan’s Special Animals. List
produced by the Endangered Species Program of the Michigan DNR and the
Michigan Natural Features Inventory. Lansing MI.
Miller, K.R. 1994. In J.A. McNeely and K.R. Miller, editors. National parks conservation
and development. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.
Mueller-Dombois, D., and H. Ellenberg. 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology.
John Wiley & Sons, New York. 547 pp.
Nicholls, A.O., and Margules. 1993. An upgraded reserve selection algorithm. Biological
Conservation 64:165-169.
Noss, R.F. 1987. From plant communities to landscapes in conservation inventories: A
look at The Nature Conservancy (USA). Biological Conservation 41:11-37.
Noss, R.F. 1990. Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: A hierarchical approach.
Conservation Biology 4:355-364.
Noss, R.F. 1991. Report to the Fund for Animals in Washington, DC.
Noss, R.F., and A.Y. Cooperrider. 1994. Saving nature's legacy. Island Press,
Washington, DC.
Noss, R.F., E.T. LaRoe III, and J.M. Scott. 1995. Endangered ecosystems of the United
States: A preliminary assessment of loss and degradation. Biological Report 28,
National Biological Service, Washington, DC.
Odum, E.D., and H.T. Odum. 1972. Proceedings of the North American Wildlife and
Natural Resources Conference 39:178.
Pressey, R.L., and A.O. Nicholls. 1989. Application of a numerical algorithm to the
selection of reserves in semi-arid New South Wales. Biological Conservation 50:263278.
Pressey, R.L., C.J. Humphries, C.R. Margules, R.I. Vane-Wright, and P.H. Williams.
1993. Beyond opportunism: Key principles for systematic reserve selection. Trends in
Ecology and Evolution 8:124-128.
Pressey, R.L., and V.S. Logan. 1995. Reserve coverage and requirements in relation to
partitioning and generalization of land classes: analyses for Western New South
Wales. Conservation Biology 9(6):1506-1517.
Ride, W.L.D. 1975. In F. Fenner, editor. A national system of ecological reserves in
Australia. 64 pp.
Rockford Map Publishers. 1999. County Plat Map. Rockford Map Publishers, Inc.
http//rockfordmap.com.
Scott, J.M., F. Davis, B. Csuti, R. Noss, B. Butterfield, C. Groves, H. Anderson, S.
Caicco, F. D'Erchia, T.C. Edwards, Jr., J. Ulliman, and G. Wright. 1993. Gap
77
DRAFT 02/01/05
analysis: A geographic approach to protection of biological diversity. Wildlife
Monographs 123.
Space Imaging. 2004. Review of Remote Sensing Technologies used in the IFMAP
Project. Final Report. Prepared for State of Michigan, Department of Natural
Resources. 49 pp.
Specht, R.L. 1975. The report and its recommendations. Pages 11-16 in: F. Fenner, editor,
A national system of ecological reserves in Australia. Australian Academy of
Sciences Report No. 19. Canberra, Australia.
Specht, R.L., E.M. Roe, and V.H. Boughlon. 1974. Australian Journal of Botany
Supplement Series. Supplement No. 7.
Stoms, D., and J. Estes. 1993. A remote sensing research agenda for mapping and
monitoring biodiversity. International Journal of Remote Sensing 14:1839-1860.
Stoms, D.M. 1994. Actual vegetation layer. In J.M. Scott and M.D. Jennings, editors. A
handbook for Gap Analysis. Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit,
University of Idaho, Moscow.
Titus, H. 1945. The Land Nobody Wanted. Special Bulletin 332, Michigan State College,
Lansing. 43 pp.
United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). 1973.
International classification and mapping of vegetation. Paris.
White, D., J. Kimmerling, and W.S. Overton. 1992. Cartographic and geometric
components of a global sampling design for environmental monitoring. Cartographic
and Geographic Information Systems 19:5-22.
Williams, P.H., D. Gibbons, C. Margules, A. Rebelo, C. Humphries, and R. Pressey.
1996. A comparison of richness hotspots, rarity hotspots, and complementary areas
for conserving diversity of British birds. Conservation Biology 10:155-174.
Whittaker, R.H. 1960. Vegetation of the Siskiyou mountains, Oregon and California.
Ecological Monographs 30(3):279-338.
Whittaker, R.H. 1965. Dominance and diversity in land plant communities. Science 147:
250-259.
Whittaker, R.H. 1977. Species diversity in land communities. Evolutionary Biology 10:167.
78
DRAFT 02/01/05
GLOSSARY
aerial videography - video images of the land surface taken from an airplane
algorithm - a procedure to solve a problem or model a solution (In GAP typically refers to
a GIS procedure used to model animal distributions.)
alliance level - a land unit made up of an "alliance" of natural communities that have the
same dominant or co-dominant plant species or, in the absence of vegetation, by the
dominant land cover typically described according to the Anderson land cover
classification (see "Natural Community Alliance" in Grossman et al. 1995)
alpha diversity - a single within-habitat measure of species diversity regardless of internal
pattern, generally over an area of 0.1 to 1,000 hectares (see Whittaker 1960, 1977) Anderson Level II - the second hierarchical level in the Anderson land cover
classification system (see Anderson et al. 1976)
anthropogenic - caused by man
assemblages - a group of ecologically interrelated plant and animal species
band, spectral - a segment of the electromagnetic spectrum defined by a range of
wavelengths (e.g. blue, green, red, near infrared, far infrared) that comprise the
Landsat TM imagery
beta diversity - the change in species diversity among different natural communities of a
landscape; an index of between-habitat diversity (see Whittaker 1960, 1977)
biodiversity - generally, the variety of life and its interrelated processes
biogeographic - relating to the geographical distribution of plants and animals
biological diversity - see biodiversity
cartographic - pertaining to the art or technique of making maps or charts
classify - to assign objects, features, or areas on an image to spectral classes based upon
their appearance as opposed to ‘classification’ referring to a scheme for describing the
hierarchies of vegetation or animal species for an area
coarse filter - the general conservation activities that conserve the common elements of
the landscape matrix, as opposed to the "fine filter" conservation activities that are
aimed at special cases such as rare elements (see Jenkins 1985)
community - a group of interacting plants and animals
cover type - a non-technical higher-level floristic and structural description of vegetation
cover
cross-walking - matching equivalent land cover categories between two or more
classification systems
delineate - identifying the boundaries between more or less homogenous areas on
remotely sensed images as visible from differences in tone and texture
delta diversity - the change in species diversity between landscapes along major climatic
or physiographic gradients (see Whittaker 1977)
digitization - entering spatial data digitally into a Geographic Information System
ecoregion - a large region, usually spanning several million hectares, characterized by
having similar biota, climate, and physiography (topography, hydrology, etc).
79
DRAFT 02/01/05
ecosystem - a biological community (ranging in scale from a single cave to millions of
hectares), its physical environment, and the processes through which matter and
energy are transferred among thecomponents
edge-matching - the process of connecting polygons at the boundary between two
independently created maps, either between TM scenes or between state GAP data
sets
element - a plant community or animal species mapped by GAP. May also be referred to
as "element of biodiversity".
error of commission - the occurrence of a species (or other map category) is erroneously
predicted in an area where it is in fact absent
error of omission - when a model fails to predict the occurrence of a species that is
actually present in an area
exact set coverage - a basic optimization problem to determine the best method for
identifying general areas that, when selected sequentially, would have the greatest
positive cumulative impact on attaining adequate representation of any or all biotic
elements of interest
extinction - disappearance of a species throughout its entire range
extirpation - disappearance of a species from part of its range
fine filter - see "coarse filter"
floristic - pertaining to the plant species that make up the vegetation of a given area.
formation level - the level of land cover categorization between Group and Alliance
describing the structural attributes of a land unit, for example, "Evergreen Coniferous
Woodlands with Rounded Crowns" (see Jennings 1993b)
gamma diversity - the species diversity of a landscape, generally covering 1,000 to
1,000,000 hectares, made up of more than one kind of natural community (see
Whittaker 1977)
gap analysis - a comparison of the distribution of elements of biodiversity with that of
areas managed for their long-term viability to identify elements with inadequate
representation
geographic information systems - computer hardware and software for storing, retrieving,
manipulating, and analyzing spatial data
Global Positioning System (GPS) - an instrument that utilizes satellite signals to pinpoint
its location on the earth's surface
greedy heuristic - an algorithm for exact set cover analysis (see Kiester et al., in press)
ground truthing - verifying maps by checking the actual occurrence of plant and animal
species in the field at representative sample locations
habitat - the physical structure, vegetational composition, and physiognomy of an area,
the characteristics of which determine its suitability for particular animal or plant
species
hectare - a metric unit of area of 10,000 square meters and equal to 2.47 acres
hex/hexagon - typically refers to the EPA EMAP hexagonal grid of 635 square kilometer
units
hyperclustering - a efficient, interactive method for accurately analyzing and classifying
remotely-sensed data that reduces data size and computational requirements while
retaining the integrity of the originaldata
80
DRAFT 02/01/05
lotic - flowing, e.g., water in a stream or river
metadata - information about data, e.g., their source, lineage, content, structure, and
availability
minimum mapping unit - the smallest area that is depicted on a map
neotropics - the zoo-geographic region stretching southward from the tropic of Cancer
and including southern Mexico, Central and South America, and the West Indies
phenology - the study of periodic biological phenomena, such as flowering, breeding, and
migration, especially as related to climate
phenotype - the environmentally and genetically determined observable appearance of an
organism, especially as considered with respect to all possible genetically influenced
expressions of one specific character
physiognomic - based on physical features
physiographic province - a region having a pattern of relief features or land forms that
differ significantly from that of adjacent regions
pixel - the smallest spatial unit in a raster data structure
polygon - an area enclosed by lines in a vector-based Geographic Information System
data layer or a region of contiguous homogeneous pixels in a raster system
preprocessing - those operations that prepare data for subsequent analysis, usually by
attempts to correct or compensate for systematic, radiometric, and geometric errors
pro-active - acting in anticipation of an event as opposed to reacting after the fact
range - the geographic limit of the species
range unit - a spatial, geographic unit to record and display species geographic range.
reach - a stream or river segment between inflowing tributaries
registration, spatial - matching different images to each other by finding points on the
images that can be matched to known points on the ground
remote sensing - deriving information about the earth's surface from images acquired at a
distance, usually relying on measurement of electromagnetic radiation reflected or
emitted from the feature of interest
resolution - the ability of a remote sensing system to record and display fine detail in a
distinguishable manner or: the smallest feature that can be distinguished or resolved
on a map or image, such as a TM pixel
scale, map - the ratio of distance on a map to distance in the real word, expressed as a
fraction; the smaller the denominator, the larger the scale, e.g. 1:24,000 is larger than
1:100,000
sensitivity analysis - the consideration of a number of factors involved in the
mathematical modeling of an ecosystem and its components. These include feedback
and control, and the stability and sensitivity of the system as a whole to changes in
some part of the system. Predictions can be made from the analysis.
simulated annealing - an algorithm used for set coverage analysis (see Kiester et al., in
press)
species richness - the number of species of a particular interest group found in a given
area
spectral cluster - a group of adjacent pixels that are uniform with respect to their
brightness values
81
DRAFT 02/01/05
supervised classification - the process of classifying TM pixels of unknown identity by
using samples of known identity (i.e., pixels already assigned to informational classes
by ground truthing or registration with known land cover) as training data
synoptic - constituting a brief statement or outline of a subject; presenting a summary
tessellation - the division of a map into areas of equal and uniform shape such as the
EPA- EMAP hexagon
Thematic Mapper - a sensor on LANDSAT 4 and 5 satellites that records information in
seven spectral bands, has a spatial resolution of about 30 m x 30 m, and represents
digital values in 256 levels of brightness per band
transect - a transversely cut line along which physical and biological observations are
made
trophic structure - the various levels in a food chain, such as producers (plants), primary
consumers (herbivores), and secondary consumers (carnivores)
Universal Transverse Mercator - one of several map projections or systems of
transformations that enables locations on the spherical earth to be represented
systematically on a flat map
Universal Transverse Mercator grid - a geographic reference system used as the basis for
worldwide locational coding of information in a GIS or on a map
unsupervised classification - the definition, identification, labeling, and mapping of
natural groups, or classes, of spectral values within a scene. These spectral classes are
reasonably uniform in brightness in several spectral channels.
vector format - a data structure that uses polygons, arcs (lines), and points as fundamental
units for analysis and manipulation in a Geographic Information System
virtual reality - a computer-generated simulation of reality with which users can interact
using specialized peripherals such as data gloves and head-mounted computer graphic
displays
wildlife habitat relationship model - a method of linking patterns of known habitat use by
animal species with maps of existing vegetation, thereby identifying the spatial extent
of important habitat features for use in conservation and management.
82
DRAFT 02/01/05
GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS
ACSM American Congress on Surveying and Mapping
ADAMAS Aquatic Database Management System
ADEM Alabama Department of Environmental Management
AML ARC/INFO Macro Language
ASPRS American Society for Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing
AVHRR Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (satellite system)
BEST Biomonitoring of Environmental Status and Trends
BLM Bureau of Land Management
CAFF Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna
C-CAP Coastwatch Change Analysis Program (NOAA)
CDC Conservation Data Center
CEC Council on Environmental Cooperation
CENR Committee on Environment and Natural Resources
CERES California Environmental Resources Evaluation System
CIESIN Consortium for Internat'l Earth Science Information Network
CODA Conservation Options and Decision Analysis (software)
CRMP Coordinated Resource Management Plan
CRT Cathode ray tube
CRUC Cooperative Research Unit Center
DLG-E Digital line graph – enhanced
DNR Department of Natural Resources
DOI Department of the Interior
EDC EROS Data Center
ECOMAP The National Hierarchical Framework of Ecological Units mapping project of
the USDA Forest Service
EMAP Environmental Monitoring & Assessment Program
EMAP-LC EMAP-Landscape Characterization (USEPA)
EMSL Environmental Monitoring & Systems Laboratory (USEPA)
EMTC Environmental Management Technical Center (NBS)
EOS Earth Observing System
EOSAT Earth Observation Satellite Company (the commercial operator of the Landsat
satellite system)
EOSDIS EOS Data & Information System
ERL Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis (USEPA)
EROS Earth Resources Observation Systems (USGS)
ESRI Environmental Systems Research Institute
ETM+ Enhanced Thematic Mapper plus
FGDC Federal Geographic Data Committee
FTP file transfer protocol
FY Fiscal Year
GAO General Accounting Office (Congress)
GAP Gap Analysis Program
83
DRAFT 02/01/05
GCDIS Global Change Data and Information System
GLIS Global Land Information System (USGS)
GLOBE Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the Environment
GPS Global Positioning System
GRASS Geographic Resources Analysis Support System
GRIS Geographic Resource Information Systems
HRMSI High Resolution Multispectral Stereo Imager
IALE International Association of Landscape Ecology
IDRISI A GIS developed by Clark University
IFMAP Integrated Forest Monitoring Assessment and Prescription program of the
Michigan Department of Natural Resources
LAPS Land Acquisition Priority System
LC/LU Land Cover/Land Use (USGS)
MIPS Map and Image Processing System
MOU Memorandum of Understanding
MMU Minimum mapping unit
MRLC Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium
MSS Multi-Spectral Scanner
MTPE Mission to Planet Earth
NAFTA North American Free Trade Agreement
NALC North American Landscape Characterization (USEPA, USGS)
NAWQA National Water Quality Assessment (USGS)
NBII National Biological Information Infrastructure
NBS National Biological Service
NCCP Natural Communities Conservation Planning program (in CA)
NDCDB National Digital Cartographic Data Base
NERC National Ecology Research Center (Ft. Collins, CO)
NMD National Mapping Division
NPS National Park Service
NSDI National Spatial Data Infrastructure
NSTC National Science and Technology Council
NWI National Wetlands Inventory (USFWS)
OMB Office of Management and Budget (Administration)
OSIS Oregon Species Information System
PARC Public Access Resource Center
PI Principal Investigator
SAB Science Advisory Board (USEPA)
SCICOLL Scientific Collections Permit Database
SDTS Spatial Data Transfer Standard
SGID State Geographic Information Database
SNEP Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project
SOFIA Southern Forest Inventory and Analysis
SPOT Système Pour l'Observation de la Terre
RMSE Root mean square error
84
DRAFT 02/01/05
TIGER Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing system (used for
U.S. census)
TM Thematic Mapper
TNC The Nature Conservancy
UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization
URISA Urban and Regional Information Systems Association.
URL Universal Resource Locator
USFS US Forest Service
USFWS US Fish & Wildlife Service
UTM Universal Transverse Mercator
UVM University of Vermont
WHRM Wildlife/habitat relationship model
WISCLAND Wisconsin Initiative for Statewide Cooperation on Landscape Analysis and
Data
85
DRAFT 02/01/05
APPENDICES
86
DRAFT 02/01/05
Appendix A. Cross-walk of the National Vegetation Classification System (NVCS) to
the IFMAP/Gap land cover classification system.
Formation
Num
MI
Level
3
Code
MI
Level
4
Code
Key
Alliance Name
310
3103
MI
Level
5
Code
III.B.2.N.b
3
A.931
RUBUS PARVIFLORUS SHRUBLAND
ALLIANCE
IV.A.1.N.b
9
A.1080
JUNIPERUS HORIZONTALIS DWARFSHRUBLAND ALLIANCE
310
3102
A.1191
ANDROPOGON GERARDII (CALAMAGROSTIS CANADENSIS,
PANICUM VIRGATUM) HERBACEOUS
ALLIANCE
310
3102
31021
A.1192
ANDROPOGON GERARDII (SORGHASTRUM NUTANS)
HERBACEOUS ALLIANCE
310
3102
31021
A.1198
SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM SORGHASTRUM NUTANS
HERBACEOUS ALLIANCE
310
3102
31021
A.1224
SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM (SPOROBOLUS CRYPTANDRUS)
HERBACEOUS ALLIANCE
310
3102
31021
SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS (DESCHAMPSIA CAESPITOSA,
SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM)
HERBACEOUS ALLIANCE
310
3102
31021
310
3102
310
3102
V.A.5.N.a
V.A.5.N.a
V.A.5.N.a
V.A.5.N.c
1
2
8
19
V.A.5.N.c
41
A.1402
V.A.5.N.c
2
A.1207
V.A.5.N.c
104
A.1195
AMMOPHILA BREVILIGULATA
HERBACEOUS ALLIANCE
PHLEUM PRATENSE HERBACEOUS
ALLIANCE
87
31022
Comments
thimbleberry-probably
only in UP
Alvar,
limestone
pavements
and dunes
but at least
25%
vegetated
and has
quite a bit of
grasses
Found
throughout
state, but
probably
more
common in
central and
southern LP.
Found
throughout
state, but
probably
more
common in
central and
southern LP.
Found
throughout
state, but
probably
more
common in
central and
southern LP.
Found
throughout
state, but
probably
more
common in
central and
southern LP.
Found
throughout
state, but
probably
more
common in
central and
southern LP.
Beach grass
dune
community
Semi natural
DRAFT 02/01/05
V.A.5.N.e
8
A.1281
DANTHONIA SPICATA HERBACEOUS
ALLIANCE
310
3102
V.B.2.N.a
3
A.1599
PTERIDIUM AQUILINUM - BROMUS
KALMII HERBACEOUS ALLIANCE
310
3103
III.A.3.N.a
2
A.808
JUNIPERUS COMMUNIS SHRUBLAND
ALLIANCE
320
3205
III.B.2.N.a
400
A.3508
ACER SPICATUM SHRUBLAND
ALLIANCE
320
3205
III.B.2.N.a
5
A.898
CORYLUS CORNUTA - AMELANCHIER
SPP. SHRUBLAND ALLIANCE
320
3204
III.B.2.N.a
19
A.912
PRUNUS PUMILA SHRUBLAND
ALLIANCE
320
3204
III.C.2.N.a
400
A.3560
TAXUS CANADENSIS - MIXED
DECIDUOUS SHRUBLAND ALLIANCE
320
3205
A.1491
QUERCUS MACROCARPA - (QUERCUS
ALBA) WOODED HERBACEOUS
ALLIANCE
330
3301
A.1492
QUERCUS VELUTINA - (QUERCUS
ELLIPSOIDALIS) WOODED
HERBACEOUS ALLIANCE
330
3301
A.1499
PINUS BANKSIANA - (PINUS
RESINOSA) WOODED HERBACEOUS
ALLIANCE
330
3303
330
3303
330
3302
V.A.6.N.c
V.A.6.N.c
V.A.6.N.f
2
3
5
V.A.6.N.f
2
A.1496
PINUS STROBUS - QUERCUS (ALBA,
RUBRA) WOODED HERBACEOUS
ALLIANCE
V.A.6.N.f
402
A.3533
THUJA OCCIDENTALIS WOODED
HERBACEOUS ALLIANCE
88
Glade and
alvar type
dominated
by bracken
fern--mostly
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212)
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212)--mostly
alvar
shrublands
This type is
only known
for Isle
Royale
Found
mostly in UP
shrub dune
community
along Lake
Michigan
This type is
only known
for Isle
Royale, but
could be in
northern UP
Found
throughout
state, but
more
common in
central and
southern LP.
Would
probably not
be in UP
Found
throughout
state, but
more
common in
central and
southern LP.
Would
probably not
be in UP
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212)
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212)
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212)--alvar
DRAFT 02/01/05
type
I.B.2.N.a
I.B.2.N.a
4
5
A.216
ACER SACCHARUM - BETULA
ALLEGHANIENSIS - (FAGUS
GRANDIFOLIA) FOREST ALLIANCE
411
4110
A.217
ACER SACCHARUM - FRAXINUS
AMERICANA - TILIA AMERICANA
FOREST ALLIANCE
411
4111
411
4112
I.B.2.N.a
15
A.227
FAGUS GRANDIFOLIA - ACER
SACCHARUM - (LIRIODENDRON
TULIPIFERA) FOREST ALLIANCE
I.B.2.N.a
18
A.230
FAGUS GRANDIFOLIA - QUERCUS
SPP. - ACER SPP. FOREST ALLIANCE
411
4119
I.B.2.N.a
27
A.239
QUERCUS ALBA - (QUERCUS RUBRA,
CARYA SPP.) FOREST ALLIANCE
412
4120
I.B.2.N.a
101
A.1912
QUERCUS MUEHLENBERGII - (ACER
SACCHARUM) FOREST ALLIANCE
412
4129
I.B.2.N.a
39
A.251
QUERCUS RUBRA - (ACER
SACCHARUM) FOREST ALLIANCE
412
4123
412
4126
I.B.2.N.a
100
A.1911
QUERCUS VELUTINA - QUERCUS
ALBA - (QUERCUS COCCINEA)
FOREST ALLIANCE
II.B.2.N.a
12
A.612
QUERCUS ALBA - (QUERCUS
VELUTINA) WOODLAND ALLIANCE
412
4126
II.B.2.N.a
21
A.621
QUERCUS MUEHLENBERGII
WOODLAND ALLIANCE
412
4129
I.B.2.N.b
5
A.269
POPULUS TREMULOIDES - BETULA
PAPYRIFERA FOREST ALLIANCE
413
4137
II.B.2.N.a
10
A.610
POPULUS TREMULOIDES WOODLAND
ALLIANCE
413
4130
89
Found
throughout
state, but
more
common in
UP and
northern LP
Found
throughout
state, but
may be more
common in
LP
Mostly in LP
(Bailey
province
222)
Mostly in LP
(Bailey
province
222)
Found
throughout
state
Mostly in LP
(Bailey
province
222)
Found
throughout
state
Found
throughout
state, but
may be more
common in
LP
Found
throughout
state, but
mostly in
central and
southern LP
Found
throughout
state, but
mostly in
central and
southern LP
on bluffs
along major
rivers
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212)
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212)
DRAFT 02/01/05
I.B.2.N.b
3
A.267
BETULA PAPYRIFERA FOREST
ALLIANCE
414
I.A.8.C.x
8
A.98
PINUS STROBUS PLANTED FOREST
ALLIANCE
421
42100
I.A.8.N.b
2
A.116
PINUS BANKSIANA FOREST ALLIANCE
422
42220
I.A.8.N.b
12
A.126
PINUS RESINOSA FOREST ALLIANCE
422
42210
I.A.8.N.b
13
A.127
PINUS STROBUS - TSUGA
CANADENSIS FOREST ALLIANCE
422
42200
I.A.8.N.b
14
A.128
PINUS STROBUS FOREST ALLIANCE
422
42200
A.391
PINUS BANKSIANA - QUERCUS
(ELLIPSOIDALIS, VELUTINA) FOREST
ALLIANCE
422
42250
422
42260
I.C.3.N.a
11
4141?
I.C.3.N.a
20
A.400
PINUS STROBUS - (PINUS RESINOSA)
- POPULUS TREMULOIDES FOREST
ALLIANCE
I.C.3.N.a
300
A.3012
PINUS STROBUS - ACER SACCHARUM
FOREST ALLIANCE
422
42201
I.C.3.N.a
21
A.401
PINUS STROBUS - QUERCUS (ALBA,
RUBRA, VELUTINA) FOREST ALLIANCE
422
42250
II.A.4.N.a
9
A.507
PINUS (BANKSIANA, RESINOSA)
WOODLAND ALLIANCE
422
42290
VI.B.1.N.c
1
A.1828
PINUS BANKSIANA / CLADINA SPP.
NONVASCULAR ALLIANCE
422
42220
I.A.8.N.c
13
A.148
PICEA GLAUCA - ABIES BALSAMEA
FOREST ALLIANCE
423
42340
90
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212); birch
>60%
This is the
only planted
conifer forest
type we have
in the
USNVC for
the northern
MW
Found
throughout
state in
Bailey
province 212
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212)
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212)
Found
throughout
state
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212)
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212)
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212)
Found
throughout
state from
central LP
and north
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212)
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212)
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212)
DRAFT 02/01/05
I.A.8.N.c
7
A.142
THUJA OCCIDENTALIS FOREST
ALLIANCE
423
42360
I.A.8.N.c
8
A.143
TSUGA CANADENSIS FOREST
ALLIANCE
423
42350
I.C.3.N.a
38
A.418
PICEA GLAUCA - ABIES BALSAMEA POPULUS SPP. FOREST ALLIANCE
423
42390
II.A.4.N.b
8
A.551
PICEA GLAUCA WOODLAND ALLIANCE
423
42320
II.A.4.N.b
1
A.544
THUJA OCCIDENTALIS WOODLAND
ALLIANCE
423
42360
I.C.3.N.a
32
A.412
TSUGA CANADENSIS - BETULA
ALLEGHANIENSIS FOREST ALLIANCE
431
4312
I.B.2.N.d
4
A.279
ACER SACCHARINUM TEMPORARILY
FLOODED FOREST ALLIANCE
611
6113
A.286
FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANICA - ULMUS
AMERICANA - CELTIS (OCCIDENTALIS,
LAEVIGATA) TEMPORARILY FLOODED
FOREST ALLIANCE
611
6119
A.300
POPULUS TREMULOIDES
TEMPORARILY FLOODED FOREST
ALLIANCE
611
6112
A.300
POPULUS TREMULOIDES
TEMPORARILY FLOODED FOREST
ALLIANCE
611
6111
A.300
POPULUS TREMULOIDES
TEMPORARILY FLOODED FOREST
ALLIANCE
611
6116
A.316
ACER RUBRUM - FRAXINUS
PENNSYLVANICA SEASONALLY
FLOODED FOREST ALLIANCE
611
6113
611
6114
611
6115
I.B.2.N.d
I.B.2.N.d
I.B.2.N.d
I.B.2.N.d
I.B.2.N.e
11
25
25
25
1
I.B.2.N.e
14
A.329
QUERCUS PALUSTRIS - (QUERCUS
BICOLOR) SEASONALLY FLOODED
FOREST ALLIANCE
I.B.2.N.g
1
A.347
FRAXINUS NIGRA - ACER RUBRUM
SATURATED FOREST ALLIANCE
91
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212)
Found
throughout
state
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212)
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212)-primarily in
UP
Found
throughout
state
Found
throughout
state
Found
throughout
state--mostly
riparian or
levee sites
Found
throughout
state
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212)--mostly
riparian
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212)--mostly
riparian
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212)--mostly
riparian
Found
throughout
state-bottomland
hardwoods
Found
throughout
state-flatwoods
Found
throughout
state, but
more
common in
UP and
DRAFT 02/01/05
northern LP
V.A.7.N.p
5
A.1562
DASIPHORA FRUTICOSA SSP.
FLORIBUNDA - MYRICA GALE - (CAREX
LASIOCARPA) SATURATED
SHRUBLAND ALLIANCE
DASIPHORA FRUTICOSA SSP.
FLORIBUNDA / CAREX (FLAVA,
INTERIOR, LASIOCARPA, STERILIS)
SATURATED SHRUB HERBACEOUS
ALLIANCE
I.A.8.N.g
3
A.197
I.A.8.N.g
6
III.B.2.N.g
I.B.2.N.g
4
3
A.1017
611
6221
611
6221
PICEA MARIANA SATURATED FOREST
ALLIANCE
612
6122
A.200
THUJA OCCIDENTALIS SATURATED
FOREST ALLIANCE
612
6120
A.349
LARIX LARICINA SATURATED FOREST
ALLIANCE
612
6121
621
621
Found
throughout
state
3
A.443
PINUS STROBUS - (ACER RUBRUM)
SATURATED FOREST ALLIANCE
612
6127
I.A.8.N.g
7
A.201
TSUGA CANADENSIS SATURATED
FOREST ALLIANCE
613
6131
I.C.3.N.a
37
A.417
THUJA OCCIDENTALIS - BETULA
ALLEGHANIENSIS FOREST ALLIANCE
613
6132
A.446
THUJA OCCIDENTALIS - ACER
RUBRUM SATURATED FOREST
ALLIANCE
613
6132
6
V.A.5.N.l
14
A.1441
V.C.2.N.a
100
A.1671
ZIZANIA (AQUATICA, PALUSTRIS)
SEMIPERMANENTLY FLOODED
HERBACEOUS ALLIANCE
NELUMBO LUTEA PERMANENTLY
FLOODED TEMPERATE HERBACEOUS
ALLIANCE
V.C.2.N.a
14
A.1754
NYMPHAEA ODORATA - NUPHAR SPP.
PERMANENTLY FLOODED
TEMPERATE HERBACEOUS ALLIANCE
POTAMOGETON SPP. CERATOPHYLLUM SPP. - ELODEA
SPP. PERMANENTLY FLOODED
HERBACEOUS ALLIANCE
III.B.2.N.e
1
A.986
ALNUS INCANA SEASONALLY
FLOODED SHRUBLAND ALLIANCE
V.C.2.N.a
102
A.1984
92
Found
throughout
state
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212)
Found
throughout
state, but
rare in
southern LP
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212)
Found
throughout
state, but
rare in
southern LP
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212)
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212)
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212)
Found
throughout
state
I.C.3.N.d
I.C.3.N.d
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212)
621
621
622
6220
Found
throughout
state
Found
throughout
state
DRAFT 02/01/05
III.B.2.N.e
4
A.989
CORNUS SERICEA - SALIX SPP.
SEASONALLY FLOODED SHRUBLAND
ALLIANCE
622
6223
622
6221
III.B.2.N.f
1
A.1011
CEPHALANTHUS OCCIDENTALIS
SEMIPERMANENTLY FLOODED
SHRUBLAND ALLIANCE
III.B.2.N.g
8
A.1021
BETULA PUMILA - (SALIX SPP.)
SATURATED SHRUBLAND ALLIANCE
622
6221
622
6221
622
6225
622
6225
622
6224
622
6229
III.B.2.N.g
3
A.1016
CORNUS SERICEA - PHOTINIA
MELANOCARPA - TOXICODENDRON
VERNIX SATURATED SHRUBLAND
ALLIANCE
III.B.2.N.g
5
A.1018
VACCINIUM CORYMBOSUM
SATURATED SHRUBLAND ALLIANCE
IV.A.1.N.f
2
A.1091
IV.A.1.N.g
1
A.1092
IV.A.1.N.g
2
A.1092
CHAMAEDAPHNE CALYCULATA (KALMIA ANGUSTIFOLIA)
SEASONALLY FLOODED DWARFSHRUBLAND ALLIANCE
CHAMAEDAPHNE CALYCULATA
SATURATED DWARF-SHRUBLAND
ALLIANCE
CHAMAEDAPHNE CALYCULATA
SATURATED DWARF-SHRUBLAND
ALLIANCE
V.A.5.N.j
11
A.1347
SPARTINA PECTINATA TEMPORARILY
FLOODED HERBACEOUS ALLIANCE
623
6233
V.A.5.N.j
11
A.1347
SPARTINA PECTINATA TEMPORARILY
FLOODED HERBACEOUS ALLIANCE
623
6232
A.1400
CALAMAGROSTIS CANADENSIS
SEASONALLY FLOODED
HERBACEOUS ALLIANCE
623
6233
623
6233
V.A.5.N.k
39
V.A.5.N.k
42
A.1403
CAREX (ROSTRATA, UTRICULATA)
SEASONALLY FLOODED
HERBACEOUS ALLIANCE
V.A.5.N.k
43
A.1404
CAREX AQUATILIS SEASONALLY
FLOODED HERBACEOUS ALLIANCE
623
6233
V.A.5.N.k
36
A.1397
CAREX STRICTA SEASONALLY
FLOODED HERBACEOUS ALLIANCE
623
6233
93
Found
throughout
state, but
more
common in
central and
southern LP
Found
throughout
state
Found
throughout
state, but
more
common in
UP and
northern LP
Found
throughout
state, but
mostly in
central and
southern LP
Found
throughout
state
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212)
Found
throughout
state
Found
throughout
state
Found
throughout
state
Found
throughout
state
Found
throughout
state
Found
throughout
state, but
more
common in
UP and
northern LP
Not common
in MI and
probably
does not
need to be
included
Found
throughout
state
DRAFT 02/01/05
V.A.5.N.k
23
A.1384
RHYNCHOSPORA SPP. - PANICUM
(RIGIDULUM, VERRUCOSUM) - RHEXIA
VIRGINICA SEASONALLY FLOODED
HERBACEOUS ALLIANCE
623
6230
623
6232
623
6239
Found
throughout
state, but
more
common in
central and
southern LP-associated
with Lake
Michigan
coastal plain.
Would
probably not
be in UP.
V.A.5.N.k
33
A.1394
TYPHA SPP. - (SCHOENOPLECTUS
SPP., JUNCUS SPP.) SEASONALLY
FLOODED HERBACEOUS ALLIANCE
V.A.5.N.k
7
A.1368
CLADIUM MARISCOIDES SEASONALLY
FLOODED HERBACEOUS ALLIANCE
A.1431
PHRAGMITES AUSTRALIS
SEMIPERMANENTLY FLOODED
HERBACEOUS ALLIANCE
623
6231
A.1444
SCHOENOPLECTUS MARITIMUS
SEMIPERMANENTLY FLOODED
HERBACEOUS ALLIANCE
623
6233
A.1436
TYPHA (ANGUSTIFOLIA, LATIFOLIA) (SCHOENOPLECTUS SPP.)
SEMIPERMANENTLY FLOODED
HERBACEOUS ALLIANCE
623
6230
623
6233
623
6233
Found
throughout
state
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212) along
Lake
Superior and
northern
Lake
Michigan
coasts
Found
throughout
state
6233
Found
throughout
state
V.A.5.N.l
V.A.5.N.l
V.A.5.N.l
4
17
9
V.A.5.N.m
400
A.3525
CALAMAGROSTIS CANADENSIS CAREX VIRIDULA - CLADIUM
MARISCOIDES - LOBELIA KALMII
SATURATED HERBACEOUS ALLIANCE
V.A.5.N.m
7
A.1453
CAREX LASIOCARPA SATURATED
HERBACEOUS ALLIANCE
A.1467
CAREX OLIGOSPERMA - CAREX
LASIOCARPA SATURATED
HERBACEOUS ALLIANCE
623
710
V.A.5.N.m
21
V.B.2.N.f
13
A.1694
SYMPLOCARPUS FOETIDUS - CALTHA
PALUSTRIS SATURATED
HERBACEOUS ALLIANCE
VII.B.2.N.b
1
A.1850
COBBLE/GRAVEL SHORE SPARSELY
VEGETATED ALLIANCE
94
623
6239
Found
throughout
state
Found
throughout
state, but
more
common in
central and
southern LP.
Would
probably not
be in UP
Found
throughout
state
Found
throughout
state, but
very rare
Found
throughout
state
Found
throughout
state--Great
Lakes shore
type
DRAFT 02/01/05
VII.C.2.N.a
3
A.1862
INLAND STRAND BEACH SPARSELY
VEGETATED ALLIANCE
710
VII.A.1.N.a
6
A.1836
OPEN CLIFF SPARSELY VEGETATED
ALLIANCE
720
VII.C.3.N.b
4
A.1872
SMALL ERODING BLUFFS SPARSELY
VEGETATED ALLIANCE
720
730
VII.C.4.N.c
1
A.1878
NON-TIDAL MUD FLAT
SEASONALLY/TEMPORARILY
FLOODED SPARSELY VEGETATED
ALLIANCE
VII.A.2.N.a
4
A.1843
OPEN PAVEMENT SPARSELY
VEGETATED ALLIANCE
790
VII.B.1.N.a
1
A.1847
LOWLAND TALUS SPARSELY
VEGETATED ALLIANCE
790
VII.C.2.N.a
2
A.1861
CAKILE EDENTULA SPARSELY
VEGETATED ALLIANCE
790
VII.C.3.N.b
3
A.1871
CLAY SLOPES SPARSELY
VEGETATED ALLIANCE
790
95
Found
throughout
state--Great
Lakes shore
type
Found
throughout
state
Found
throughout
state, but
probably
more
common in
central and
southern LP.
Probably not
in UP
Found
throughout
state along
lakes and
rivers
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212)--mostly
along
lakeshores
and/or are
alvar types
Found
throughout
state
Found
throughout
state--Great
Lakes shore
type
Northern LP
and UP
(Bailey
province
212)
DRAFT 02/01/05
Appendix B. List of terrestrial vertebrate species modeled for MI-GAP, including MIGAP species codes and TNC element codes.
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Element Code
Code
Blue-spotted salamander
Spotted salamander
Marbled salamander
Smallmouth salamander
Eastern tiger salamander
Four-toed salamander
Redback salamander
Mudpuppy
Eastern newt
Western lesser siren
American toad
Fowler's toad
Blanchard's cricket frog
Gray treefrog
Western chorus frog
Northern spring peeper
Bullfrog
Green frog
Pickerel frog
Northern leopard frog
Mink frog
Wood frog
amla
amma
amop
amte
amti
hesc
plci
nema
novi
siin
buam
bufo
accr
hyve
pstr
pscr
raca
racl
rapa
rapi
rase
rasy
AAAAA01060
AAAAA01090
AAAAA01100
AAAAA01130
AAAAA01140
AAAAD08010
AAAAD12020
AAAAE01040
AAAAF01030
AAAAG02010
AAABB01020
AAABB01210
AAABC01010
AAABC02130
AAABC05070
AAABC05090
AAABH01070
AAABH01090
AAABH01160
AAABH01170
AAABH01190
AAABH01200
Five-lined skink
Six-lined racerunner
Kirtland's snake
Blue racer
Northern ring-necked snake
Black rat snake
Eastern fox snake
Westen fox snake
Eastern hog-nosed snake
Eastern milk snake
Copper-bellied water snake
Northern water snake
Queen snake
Brown snake
eufa
cnse
clki
coco
dipu
elob
elvue
elvuw
hepl
latr
neer
nesi
rese
stde
ARACH01050
ARACJ02110
ARADB06010
ARADB07010
ARADB10010
ARADB13030
ARADB13061
ARADB13062
ARADB17020
ARADB19050
ARADB22020
ARADB22060
ARADB27040
ARADB34010
Northern red-bellied snake
Butler's garter snake
Northern ribbon snake
Eastern garter snake
Smooth green snake
stoc
thbu
thsa
thsi
live
ARADB34030
ARADB36020
ARADB36120
ARADB36130
ARADB47010
Amphibians
Ambystoma laterale
Ambystoma maculatum
Ambystoma opacum
Ambystoma texanum
Ambystoma tigrinum tigrinum
Hemidactylium scutatum
Plethodon cinereus
Necturus maculosus
Notophthalmus viridescens
Siren intermedia nettingi
Bufo americanus
Bufo fowleri
Acris crepitans blanchardi
Hyla versicolor
Pseudacris triseriata
Pseudacris crucifer crucifer
Rana catesbeiana
Rana clamitans
Rana palustris
Rana pipiens
Rana septentrionalis
Rana sylvatica
Reptiles
Eumeces fasciatus
Cnemidophorus sexlineatus
Clonophis kirtlandii
Coluber constrictor foxii
Diadophis punctatus edwardsi
Elaphe obsoleta obsoleta
Elaphe vulpina gloydi
Elaphe vulpina vulpina
Heterodon platirhinos
Lampropeltis triangulum triangulum
Nerodia erythrogaster neglecta
Nerodia sipedon sipedon
Regina septemvittata
Storeria dekayi
Storeria occipitomaculata
occipitomaculata
Thamnophis butleri
Thamnophis sauritus septentrionalis
Thamnophis sirtalis sirtalis
Liochlorophis vernalis
96
DRAFT 02/01/05
Sistrurus catenatus catenatus
Chelydra serpentina
Chrysemys picta
Clemmys guttata
Glyptemys insculpta
Emydoidea blandingii
Graptemys geographica
Terrapene carolina carolina
Trachemys scripta elegans
Sternotherus odoratus
Apalone spinifera
Mammals
Myotis lucifugus
Myotis sodalis
Myotis septentrionalis
Lasionycteris noctivagans
Pipistrellus subflavus
Eptesicus fuscus
Lasiurus borealis
Lasiurus cinereus
Canis latrans
Canis lupus
Vulpes vulpes
Urocyon cinereoargenteus
Ursus americanus
Procyon lotor
Martes americana
Martes pennanti
Mustela erminea
Mustela nivalis
Mustela frenata
Mustela vison
Taxidea taxus
Mephitis mephitis
Lutra canadensis
Lynx rufus
Didelphis virginiana
Sylvilagus floridanus
Lepus americanus
Tamias minimus
Tamias striatus
Marmota monax
Spermophilus tridecemlineatus
Sciurus carolinensis
Sciurus niger
Tamiasciurus hudsonicus
Glaucomys volans
Glaucomys sabrinus
Castor canadensis
Eastern massasauga
rattlesnake
Snapping turtle
Painted turtle
Spotted turtle
Wood turtle
Blanding's turtle
Common map turtle
Eastern box turtle
Red-eared slider
Common musk turtle
Spiny softshell
sicat
chse
chpi
clgu
glin
embl
grge
teca
trsc
stod
apsp
ARADE03010
ARAAB01010
ARAAD01010
ARAAD02010
ARAAD02020
ARAAD04010
ARAAD05040
ARAAD08010
ARAAD09010
ARAAE02040
ARAAG01030
Little brown bat
Indiana bat
Northern myotis
Silver-haired bat
Eastern pipistrelle
Big brown bat
Eastern red bat
Hoary bat
Coyote
Gray wolf
Red fox
Common gray fox
Black bear
Common raccoon
American marten
Fisher
Ermine
Least weasel
Long-tailed weasel
Mink
American badger
Striped skunk
Northern river otter
Bobcat
Virginia opossum
Eastern cottontail
Snowshoe hare
Least chipmunk
Eastern chipmunk
Woodchuck
Thirteen-lined ground squirrel
Eastern gray squirrel
Eastern fox squirrel
Red squirrel
Southern flying squirrel
Northern flying squirrel
American beaver
mylu
myso
myse
lano
pisu
epfu
labo
laci
cala
calu
vuvu
urci
uram
prlo
maam
mape
muer
muni
mufr
muvi
tata
meme
luca
lyru
divi
syfl
leam
tami
tast
mamo
sptr
scca
scni
tahu
glvo
glsa
caca
AMACC01010
AMACC01100
AMACC01150
AMACC02010
AMACC03020
AMACC04010
AMACC05010
AMACC05030
AMAJA01010
AMAJA01030
AMAJA03010
AMAJA04010
AMAJB01010
AMAJE02010
AMAJF01010
AMAJF01020
AMAJF02010
AMAJF02020
AMAJF02030
AMAJF02050
AMAJF04010
AMAJF06010
AMAJF08010
AMAJH03020
AMAAA01010
AMAEB01040
AMAEB03010
AMAFB02020
AMAFB02230
AMAFB03010
AMAFB05090
AMAFB07010
AMAFB07040
AMAFB08010
AMAFB09010
AMAFB09020
AMAFE01010
97
DRAFT 02/01/05
Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii
Peromyscus maniculatus gracilis
Peromyscus leucopus
Clethrionomys gapperi
Microtus pennsylvanicus
Microtus ochrogaster
Microtus pinetorum
Ondatra zibethicus
Synaptomys cooperi
Zapus hudsonius
Napaeozapus insignis
Erethizon dorsatum
Sorex cinereus
Sorex palustris
Sorex fumeus
Sorex arcticus
Sorex hoyi
Blarina brevicauda
Cryptotis parva
Scalopus aquaticus
Condylura cristata
Cervus elaphus
Odocoileus virginianus
Alces alces
Birds
Cathartes aura
Pandion haliaetus
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Circus cyaneus
Accipiter striatus
Accipiter cooperii
Accipiter gentilis
Buteo lineatus
Buteo platypterus
Buteo jamaicensis
Falco sparverius
Falco columbarius
Falco peregrinus
Botaurus lentiginosus
Ixobrychus exilis
Ardea herodias
Ardea alba
Bubulcus ibis
Butorides virescens
Nycticorax nycticorax
Dolichonyx oryzivorus
Agelaius phoeniceus
Sturnella magna
Sturnella neglecta
Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus
Deer mouse (bairdii)
Deer mouse (gracilis)
White-footed mouse
Southern red-backed vole
Meadow vole
Prairie vole
Woodland vole
Muskrat
Southern bog lemming
Meadow jumping mouse
Woodland jumping mouse
Common porcupine
Masked shrew
Water shrew
Smoky shrew
Arctic shrew
Pygmy shrew
Northern short-tailed shrew
Least shrew
Eastern mole
Star-nosed mole
Elk
White-tailed deer
Moose
pemab
pemag
pele
clga
mipe
mioc
mipi
onzi
syco
zahu
nain
erdo
soci
sopa
sofu
soar
soho
blbr
crpa
scaq
cocr
ceel
odvi
alal
AMAFF03040b
AMAFF03040g
AMAFF03070
AMAFF09020
AMAFF11010
AMAFF11140
AMAFF11150
AMAFF15010
AMAFF17010
AMAFH01010
AMAFH02010
AMAFJ01010
AMABA01010
AMABA01150
AMABA01180
AMABA01190
AMABA01250
AMABA03010
AMABA04010
AMABB04010
AMABB05010
AMALC01010
AMALC02020
AMALC03010
Turkey vulture
Osprey
Bald eagle
Northern harrier
Sharp-shinned hawk
Cooper's hawk
Northern goshawk
Red-shouldered hawk
Broad-winged hawk
Red-tailed hawk
American kestrel
Merlin
Peregrine falcon
American bittern
Least bittern
Great blue heron
Great egret
Cattle egret
Green heron
Black-crowned night-heron
Bobolink
Red-winged blackbird
Eastern meadowlark
Western meadowlark
Yellow-headed blackbird
caau
paha
hale
cicy
acst
acco
acge
buli
bupl
buja
fasp
faco
fape
bole
ixex
arhe
aral
buib
buvi
nyny
door
agph
stma
stne
xaxa
ABNKA02010
ABNKC01010
ABNKC10010
ABNKC11010
ABNKC12020
ABNKC12040
ABNKC12060
ABNKC19030
ABNKC19050
ABNKC19110
ABNKD06020
ABNKD06030
ABNKD06070
ABNGA01020
ABNGA02010
ABNGA04010
ABNGA04040
ABNGA07010
ABNGA08010
ABNGA11010
ABPBXA9010
ABPBXB0010
ABPBXB2020
ABPBXB2030
ABPBXB3010
98
DRAFT 02/01/05
Euphagus carolinus
Euphagus cyanocephalus
Quiscalus quiscula
Molothrus ater
Cardinalis cardinalis
Pheucticus ludovicianus
Passerina cyanea
Spiza americana
Poecile atricapillus
Poecile hudsonicus
Baeolophus bicolor
Sitta canadensis
Sitta carolinensis
Certhia americana
Phalacrocorax auritus
Grus canadensis
Coccyzus erythropthalmus
Coccyzus americanus
Zenaida macroura
Carpodacus purpureus
Carpodacus mexicanus
Loxia curvirostra
Loxia leucoptera
Carduelis pinus
Carduelis tristis
Coccothraustes vespertinus
Contopus cooperi
Contopus virens
Empidonax flaviventris
Empidonax virescens
Empidonax alnorum
Empidonax traillii
Empidonax minimus
Sayornis phoebe
Myiarchus crinitus
Tyrannus tyrannus
Chordeiles minor
Caprimulgus vociferus
Larus delawarensis
Larus argentatus
Sterna caspia
Sterna hirundo
Sterna forsteri
Chlidonias niger
Archilochus colubris
Perisoreus canadensis
Cyanocitta cristata
Corvus brachyrhynchos
Corvus corax
Ceryle alcyon
Rusty blackbird
Brewer's blackbird
Common grackle
Brown-headed cowbird
Northern cardinal
Rose-breasted grosbeak
Indigo bunting
Dickcissel
Black-capped chickadee
Boreal chickadee
Tufted titmouse
Red-breasted nuthatch
White-breasted nuthatch
Brown creeper
Double-crested cormorant
Sandhill crane
Black-billed cuckoo
Yellow-billed cuckoo
Mourning dove
Purple finch
House finch
Red crossbill
White-winged crossbill
Pine siskin
American goldfinch
Evening grosbeak
Olive-sided flycatcher
Eastern wood-pewee
Yellow-bellied flycatcher
Acadian flycatcher
Alder flycatcher
Willow flycatcher
Least flycatcher
Eastern phoebe
Great crested flycatcher
Eastern kingbird
Common nighthawk
Whip-poor-will
Ring-billed gull
Herring gull
Caspian tern
Common tern
Forster's tern
Black tern
Ruby-throated hummingbird
Gray jay
Blue jay
American crow
Common raven
Belted kingfisher
99
euca
eucy
ququ
moat
caca
phlu
pacy
spam
poat
pohu
babi
scan
sica
ceam
phau
grca
coer
coam
zema
capu
came
locu
lole
capi
catr
cove
ccoo
covi
emfl
emvi
emal
emtr
emmi
saph
mycr
tyty
chmi
cavo
lade
laar
stca
sthi
stfo
chni
arco
peca
cycr
cobr
coco
ceal
ABPBXB5010
ABPBXB5020
ABPBXB6070
ABPBXB7030
ABPBX60010
ABPBX61030
ABPBX64030
ABPBX65010
ABPAW01010
ABPAW01060
ABPAW01110
ABPAZ01010
ABPAZ01020
ABPBA01010
ABNFD01020
ABNMK01010
ABNRB02010
ABNRB02020
ABNPB04040
ABPBY04020
ABPBY04040
ABPBY05010
ABPBY05020
ABPBY06030
ABPBY06110
ABPBY09020
ABPAE32010
ABPAE32060
ABPAE33010
ABPAE33020
ABPAE33030
ABPAE33040
ABPAE33070
ABPAE35020
ABPAE43070
ABPAE52060
ABNTA02020
ABNTA07070
ABNNM03100
ABNNM03120
ABNNM08020
ABNNM08070
ABNNM08090
ABNNM10020
ABNUC45010
ABPAV01010
ABPAV02020
ABPAV10010
ABPAV10110
ABNXD01020
DRAFT 02/01/05
Regulus satrapa
Regulus calendula
Polioptila caerulea
Eremophila alpestris
Gavia immer
Podilymbus podiceps
Podiceps grisegena
Dumetella carolinensis
Mimus polyglottos
Toxostoma rufum
Icterus spurius
Icterus galbula
Otus asio
Bubo virginianus
Strix varia
Strix nebulosa
Asio otus
Asio flammeus
Aegolius acadicus
Phasianus colchicus
Falcipennis canadensis
Bonasa umbellus
Tympanuchus phasianellus
Meleagris gallopavo
Colinus virginianus
Charadrius melodus
Charadrius vociferus
Coturnicops noveboracensis
Rallus elegans
Rallus limicola
Porzana carolina
Gallinula chloropus
Fulica americana
Actitis macularia
Bartramia longicauda
Gallinago gallinago
Scolopax minor
Phalaropus tricolor
Lanius ludovicianus
Pipilo erythrophthalmus
Spizella passerina
Spizella pallida
Spizella pusilla
Pooecetes gramineus
Passerculus sandwichensis
Ammodramus savannarum
Ammodramus henslowii
Ammodramus leconteii
Melospiza melodia
Melospiza lincolnii
Golden-crowned kinglet
Ruby-crowned kinglet
Blue-gray gnatcatcher
Horned lark
Common loon
Pied-billed grebe
Red-necked grebe
Gray catbird
Northern mockingbird
Brown thrasher
Orchard oriole
Baltimore oriole
Eastern screech-owl
Great horned owl
Barred owl
Great gray owl
Long-eared owl
Short-eared owl
Northern saw-whet owl
Ring-necked pheasant
Spruce grouse
Ruffed grouse
Sharp-tailed grouse
Wild turkey
Northern bobwhite
Piping plover
Killdeer
Yellow rail
King rail
Virginia rail
Sora
Common moorhen
American coot
Spotted sandpiper
Upland sandpiper
Common snipe
American woodcock
Wilson's phalarope
Loggerhead shrike
Eastern towhee
Chipping sparrow
Clay-colored sparrow
Field sparrow
Vesper sparrow
Savannah sparrow
Grasshopper sparrow
Henslow's sparrow
Le Conte's sparrow
Song sparrow
Lincoln's sparrow
100
resa
reca
pcae
eral
gaim
popo
pogri
duca
mipo
toru
icsp
icga
otas
bvir
stva
stneb
asot
asfl
aeac
phco
faca
boum
typh
mega
cvir
chme
chvo
cono
rael
rali
poca
gach
fuam
acma
balo
gaga
scmi
phtr
lalu
pier
sppa
spal
sppu
pogr
pasa
amsa
amhe
amle
mmel
meli
ABPBJ05010
ABPBJ05020
ABPBJ08010
ABPAT02010
ABNBA01030
ABNCA02010
ABNCA03020
ABPBK01010
ABPBK03010
ABPBK06010
ABPBXB9070
ABPBXB9190
ABNSB01030
ABNSB05010
ABNSB12020
ABNSB12040
ABNSB13010
ABNSB13040
ABNSB15020
ABNLC07010
ABNLC09010
ABNLC11010
ABNLC13030
ABNLC14010
ABNLC21020
ABNNB03070
ABNNB03090
ABNME01010
ABNME05020
ABNME05030
ABNME08020
ABNME13010
ABNME14020
ABNNF04020
ABNNF06010
ABNNF18010
ABNNF19020
ABNNF20010
ABPBR01030
ABPBX74030
ABPBX94020
ABPBX94030
ABPBX94050
ABPBX95010
ABPBX99010
ABPBXA0020
ABPBXA0030
ABPBXA0040
ABPBXA3010
ABPBXA3020
DRAFT 02/01/05
Melospiza georgiana
Zonotrichia albicollis
Junco hyemalis
Progne subis
Tachycineta bicolor
Stelgidopteryx serripennis
Riparia riparia
Petrochelidon pyrrhonota
Hirundo rustica
Cygnus buccinator
Branta canadensis
Aix sponsa
Anas crecca
Anas rubripes
Anas platyrhynchos
Anas acuta
Anas discors
Anas clypeata
Anas strepera
Anas americana
Aythya americana
Aythya collaris
Bucephala clangula
Lophodytes cucullatus
Mergus merganser
Mergus serrator
Oxyura jamaicensis
Chaetura pelagica
Piranga olivacea
Sialia sialis
Catharus fuscescens
Catharus ustulatus
Catharus guttatus
Hylocichla mustelina
Turdus migratorius
Vireo griseus
Vireo solitarius
Vireo flavifrons
Vireo gilvus
Vireo philadelphicus
Vireo olivaceus
Vermivora pinus
Vermivora chrysoptera
Vermivora peregrina
Vermivora ruficapilla
Parula americana
Dendroica petechia
Dendroica pensylvanica
Dendroica magnolia
Swamp sparrow
White-throated sparrow
Dark-eyed junco
Purple martin
Tree swallow
Northern rough-winged
swallow
Bank swallow
Cliff swallow
Barn swallow
Trumpeter swan
Canada goose
Wood duck
Green-winged teal
American black duck
Mallard
Northern pintail
Blue-winged teal
Northern shoveler
Gadwall
American wigeon
Redhead
Ring-necked duck
Common goldeneye
Hooded merganser
Common merganser
Red-breasted merganser
Ruddy duck
Chimney swift
Scarlet tanager
Eastern bluebird
Veery
Swainson's thrush
Hermit thrush
Wood thrush
American robin
White-eyed vireo
Blue-headed vireo
Yellow-throated vireo
Warbling vireo
Philadelphia vireo
Red-eyed vireo
Blue-winged warbler
Golden-winged warbler
Tennessee warbler
Nashville warbler
Northern parula
Yellow warbler
Chestnut-sided warbler
Magnolia warbler
101
mege
zoal
juhy
prsu
tabi
ABPBXA3030
ABPBXA4020
ABPBXA5020
ABPAU01010
ABPAU03010
stse
riri
pepy
hiru
cybu
brca
aisp
ancr
anru
anpl
anac
andi
ancl
anst
anam
ayam
ayco
bucl
lcuc
meme
mese
oxja
chpe
piol
sisi
cafu
caus
cagu
hymu
tumi
vigr
viso
vifl
vigi
viph
viol
vepi
vech
vepe
veru
paam
depe
dpen
dema
ABPAU07010
ABPAU08010
ABPAU09010
ABPAU09030
ABNJB02030
ABNJB05030
ABNJB09010
ABNJB10010
ABNJB10040
ABNJB10060
ABNJB10110
ABNJB10130
ABNJB10150
ABNJB10160
ABNJB10180
ABNJB11030
ABNJB11040
ABNJB18010
ABNJB20010
ABNJB21010
ABNJB21020
ABNJB22010
ABNUA03010
ABPBX45040
ABPBJ15010
ABPBJ18080
ABPBJ18100
ABPBJ18110
ABPBJ19010
ABPBJ20170
ABPBW01020
ABPBW01160
ABPBW01170
ABPBW01210
ABPBW01230
ABPBW01240
ABPBX01020
ABPBX01030
ABPBX01040
ABPBX01060
ABPBX02010
ABPBX03010
ABPBX03020
ABPBX03030
DRAFT 02/01/05
Dendroica tigrina
Dendroica caerulescens
Dendroica coronata
Dendroica virens
Dendroica fusca
Dendroica dominica
Dendroica pinus
Dendroica kirtlandii
Dendroica discolor
Dendroica palmarum
Dendroica castanea
Dendroica cerulea
Mniotilta varia
Setophaga ruticilla
Protonotaria citrea
Helmitheros vermivorus
Seiurus aurocapillus
Seiurus noveboracensis
Seiurus motacilla
Oporornis agilis
Oporornis philadelphia
Geothlypis trichas
Wilsonia citrina
Wilsonia pusilla
Wilsonia canadensis
Icteria virens
Bombycilla cedrorum
Melanerpes erythrocephalus
Melanerpes carolinus
Sphyrapicus varius
Picoides pubescens
Picoides villosus
Picoides arcticus
Colaptes auratus
Dryocopus pileatus
Thryothorus ludovicianus
Troglodytes aedon
Troglodytes troglodytes
Cistothorus platensis
Cistothorus palustris
Cape May warbler
Black-throated blue warbler
Yellow-rumped warbler
Black-throated green warbler
Blackburnian warbler
Yellow-throated warbler
Pine warbler
Kirtland's warbler
Prairie warbler
Palm warbler
Bay-breasted warbler
Cerulean warbler
Black-and-white warbler
American redstart
Prothonotary warbler
Worm-eating warbler
Ovenbird
Northern waterthrush
Louisiana waterthrush
Connecticut warbler
Mourning warbler
Common yellowthroat
Hooded warbler
Wilson's warbler
Canada warbler
Yellow-breasted chat
Cedar waxwing
Red-headed woodpecker
Red-bellied woodpecker
Yellow-bellied sapsucker
Downy woodpecker
Hairy woodpecker
Black-backed woodpecker
Northern flicker
Pileated woodpecker
Carolina wren
House wren
Winter wren
Sedge wren
Marsh wren
102
deti
dcae
deco
devi
defu
dedo
depi
deki
dedi
depa
deca
dece
mnva
seru
prci
heve
seau
seno
semo
opag
opph
getr
wici
wipu
wica
icvi
boce
meer
meca
spva
pipu
pivi
piar
coau
drpi
thlu
trae
trtr
cipl
cipa
ABPBX03040
ABPBX03050
ABPBX03060
ABPBX03100
ABPBX03120
ABPBX03130
ABPBX03170
ABPBX03180
ABPBX03190
ABPBX03210
ABPBX03220
ABPBX03240
ABPBX05010
ABPBX06010
ABPBX07010
ABPBX08010
ABPBX10010
ABPBX10020
ABPBX10030
ABPBX11020
ABPBX11030
ABPBX12010
ABPBX16010
ABPBX16020
ABPBX16030
ABPBX24010
ABPBN01020
ABNYF04040
ABNYF04170
ABNYF05010
ABNYF07030
ABNYF07040
ABNYF07090
ABNYF10020
ABNYF12020
ABPBG06130
ABPBG09010
ABPBG09050
ABPBG10010
ABPBG10020
DRAFT 02/01/05
Appendix C. Subsets and other intermediate products created from the four main data
layers (Table 5) to speed the MI-GAP vertebrate modeling process. All files are 30 m
rasters.
Name
ifmaplp
ifmapup
ifmapall
sandmud_g
lpshore_g
Source image
IFMAP/GAP land cover
IFMAP/GAP land cover
IFMAP/GAP land cover
IFMAP/GAP land cover
IFMAP/GAP land cover
Modifications made_____________
only Lower Peninsula (LP) selected
only Upper Peninsula (UP) selected
both peninsulas
selected all sand/soil and mudflats
selected all sand/soil and mudflats
within 500m buffer of LP shoreline
upshore_g
IFMAP/GAP land cover
allshore_g
shore_mir
lplowfor_g
IFMAP/GAP land cover
MIRIS land cover
National Wetlands Inventory
uplowfor_g
National Wetlands Inventory
lppfo1_g
National Wetlands Inventory
uppfo1_g
National Wetlands Inventory
lpmarsh_g
National Wetlands Inventory
upmarsh_g
National Wetlands Inventory
lplowcon_g
National Wetlands Inventory
uplowcon_g
National Wetlands Inventory
lptreebog_g
National Wetlands Inventory
uptreebog_g
National Wetlands Inventory
lpbogs_g
National Wetlands Inventory
upbogs_g
National Wetlands Inventory
lpallbogs_g
upallbogs_g
lpsedge_g
National Wetlands Inventory
National Wetlands Inventory
National Wetlands Inventory
selected all sand/soil and mudflats
within 500m buffer of UP shoreline
merged lpshore_g with upshore_g
beach and sand dunes selected
all PFO (palustrine forest) in LP
selected and converted to raster
all PFO (palustrine forest) in UP
selected and converted to raster
all PFO1 (palustrine broad-lvd decid
forest) in LP selected and converted to raster
all PFO1 (palustrine broad-lvd decid
forest) in UP selected and converted to
raster
all PEM, REM, and L2EM
(palustrine, riverine, and lacustrine/littoral
emergent wetlands) in LP selected and
converted to raster
all PEM, REM, and L2EM
(palustrine, riverine, and lacustrine/littoral
emergent wetlands) in UP selected and
converted to raster
all PFO2 and PFO4 (palustrine
coniferous) in LP selected and converted to
raster
all PFO2 and PFO4 (palustrine
coniferous) in LP selected and converted to
raster
all PFO2, PFO4, PFO5, PFO7 (treed
bogs) in LP selected and converted to raster
all PFO2, PFO4, PFO5, PFO7 (treed
bogs) in LP selected and converted to raster
all PML and PEM (non-forested
wetland/bogs) in LP selected and converted
to raster
all PML and PEM (non-forested
wetland/bogs) in UP selected and converted
to raster
merged lptreebog_g with lpbogs_g
merged uptreebog_g with upbogs_g
all PEM (emergent wetlands/sedge
meadows) in LP selected and converted to
raster
103
DRAFT 02/01/05
upsedge_g
National Wetlands Inventory
lpshrub_g
National Wetlands Inventory
upshrub_g
National Wetlands Inventory
lppss_g
National Wetlands Inventory
uppss_g
National Wetlands Inventory
hydlp_g
Michigan hydrology
hydup_g
Michigan hydrology
euchydrolp
euchydroup
lprlp_g
Michigan hydrology
Michigan hydrology
Michigan hydrology
lprup_g
Michigan hydrology
euclprlp_g
euclprup_g
lakepondlp_g
Michigan hydrology
Michigan hydrology
Michigan hydrology
lakepondup_g
Michigan hydrology
euclakepondlp
Michigan hydrology
euclakepondup
Michigan hydrology
lpsewreslp_g
Michigan hydrology
lpsewresup_g
Michigan hydrology
euclpsewreslp
Michigan hydrology
euclpsewresup
Michigan hydrology
lprz_lp
Michigan hydrology
lprz_up
Michigan hydrology
all PEM (emergent wetlands/sedge
meadows) in LP selected and converted to
raster
all PSS (palustrine scrub-shrub) in
LP selected and converted to raster
all PSS (palustrine scrub-shrub) in
UP selected and converted to raster
all PSS1C and PSS1F (palustrine
decid. scrub-shrub) in LP selected and
converted to raster
all PSS1C and PSS1F (palustrine
decid. scrub-shrub) in UP selected and
converted to raster
merged line and polygon hydrology
coverages for LP and converted to raster
merged line and polygon hydrology
coverages for UP and converted to raster
euclidean distance raster for hydlp_g
euclidean distance raster for hydlp_g
all lakes/ponds and rivers from LP
polygon hydrology coverage selected and
converted to raster
all lakes/ponds, and rivers from UP
polygon hydrology coverage selected and
converted to raster
euclidean distance raster for lprlp_g
euclidean distance raster for lprup_g
all lakes/ponds from LP polygon
hydrology coverage selected and converted
to raster
all lakes/ponds from UP polygon
hydrology coverage selected and converted
to raster
euclidean distance raster for
lakepondlp_g
euclidean distance raster for
lakepondup_g
all lakes/ponds, sewage lagoons/farm
ponds, and resevoirs from LP polygon
hydrology coverage selected and converted
to raster
all lakes/ponds, sewage lagoons/farm
ponds, and resevoirs from UP polygon
hydrology coverage selected and converted
to raster
euclidean distance raster for
lpsewreslp_g
euclidean distance raster for
lpsewresup_g
all lakes/ponds, rivers, sewage
lagoons/farm ponds, and resevoirs from LP
polygon hydrology coverage selected and
converted to raster
all lakes/ponds, rivers, sewage
104
DRAFT 02/01/05
rivstrlp_g
Michigan hydrology
rivstrup_g
Michigan hydrology
2halp_g
Michigan hydrology
2haup_g
Michigan hydrology
isl_lp
isl_up
Michigan hydrology
Michigan hydrology
lagoons/farm ponds, and resevoirs from UP
polygon hydrology coverage selected and
converted to raster
all rivers and streams from LP
polygon and line coverages selected and
converted to raster
all rivers and streams from UP
polygon and line coverages selected and
converted to raster
all lakes/ponds in LP greater than 2
ha in area selected and converted to raster
all lakes/ponds in LP greater than 2
ha in area selected and converted to raster
all islands in LP-area lakes selected
all islands in UP-area lakes selected
105
DRAFT 02/01/05
Appendix D. List of species subject to expert review and reviewers’ names and
affiliations. Expert reviewers were asked to comment on draft range maps, logical
decision rules, and habitat maps. Reviewer comments are documented in the AML
comment lines for each species.
Scientific Name
Reviewers' Name(s)
Reviewers' Affiliation(s)
Amphibians
Ambystoma laterale
Ambystoma maculatum
Ambystoma opacum
Ambystoma texanum
Ambystoma tigrinum tigrinum
Hemidactylium scutatum
Plethodon cinereus
Necturus maculosus
Notophthalmus viridescens
Siren intermedia nettingi
Bufo americanus
Bufo fowleri
Acris crepitans blanchardi
Hyla versicolor
Pseudacris triseriata
Pseudacris crucifer crucifer
Rana catesbeiana
Rana clamitans
Rana palustris
Rana pipiens
Rana septentrionalis
Rana sylvatica
Reptiles
Ms. Yu Man Lee
Ms. Yu Man Lee
Ms. Yu Man Lee
Ms. Yu Man Lee
Ms. Yu Man Lee
Ms. Yu Man Lee
Ms. Yu Man Lee
Ms. Yu Man Lee
Ms. Yu Man Lee
Ms. Yu Man Lee
Ms. Lori Sargent
Ms. Lori Sargent
Ms. Lori Sargent
Ms. Lori Sargent
Ms. Lori Sargent
Ms. Lori Sargent
Ms. Lori Sargent
Ms. Lori Sargent
Ms. Lori Sargent
Ms. Lori Sargent
Ms. Lori Sargent
Ms. Lori Sargent
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Eumeces fasciatus
Mr. James Harding
Cnemidophorus sexlineatus
Clonophis kirtlandii
Coluber constrictor foxii
Diadophis punctatus edwardsi
Elaphe obsoleta obsoleta
Elaphe vulpina gloydi
Elaphe vulpina vulpina
Heterodon platirhinos
Lampropeltis triangulum
triangulum
Nerodia erythrogaster neglecta
Nerodia sipedon sipedon
Regina septemvittata
Mr. James Harding
Ms. Yu Man Lee
Ms. Yu Man Lee
Ms. Yu Man Lee
Ms. Yu Man Lee
Ms. Yu Man Lee
Ms. Yu Man Lee
Ms. Yu Man Lee
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
of Zoology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
of Zoology
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Ms. Yu Man Lee
Ms. Yu Man Lee
Ms. Yu Man Lee
Ms. Yu Man Lee
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
106
DRAFT 02/01/05
Storeria dekayi
Storeria occipitomaculata
occipitomaculata
Thamnophis butleri
Thamnophis sauritus
septentrionalis
Thamnophis sirtalis sirtalis
Liochlorophis vernalis
Sistrurus catenatus catenatus
Ms. Yu Man Lee
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Ms. Yu Man Lee
Ms. Yu Man Lee
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Ms. Yu Man Lee
Ms. Yu Man Lee
Ms. Yu Man Lee
Ms. Yu Man Lee
Chelydra serpentina
Mr. James Harding
Chrysemys picta
Mr. James Harding
Clemmys guttata
Mr. James Harding
Glyptemys insculpta
Mr. James Harding
Emydoidea blandingii
Mr. James Harding
Graptemys geographica
Mr. James Harding
Terrapene carolina carolina
Mr. James Harding
Sternotherus odoratus
Mr. James Harding
Apalone spinifera
Mammals
Myotis lucifugus
Myotis sodalis
Myotis septentrionalis
Lasionycteris noctivagans
Pipistrellus subflavus
Eptesicus fuscus
Lasiurus borealis
Lasiurus cinereus
Canis latrans
Canis lupus
Vulpes vulpes
Urocyon cinereoargenteus
Ursus americanus
Procyon lotor
Martes americana
Martes pennanti
Mustela erminea
Mustela nivalis
Mustela frenata
Mustela vison
Taxidea taxus
Mephitis mephitis
Mr. James Harding
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
of Zoology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
of Zoology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
of Zoology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
of Zoology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
of Zoology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
of Zoology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
of Zoology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
of Zoology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
of Zoology
Dr. Allen Kurta
Dr. Allen Kurta
Dr. Allen Kurta
Dr. Allen Kurta
Dr. Allen Kurta
Dr. Allen Kurta
Dr. Allen Kurta
Dr. Allen Kurta
Mr. Tim Reis
Dr. Dean Beyer
Mr. Tim Reis
Mr. Tim Reis
Mr. Tim Reis
Mr. Tim Reis
Mr. Tim Reis
Mr. Tim Reis
Mr. Tim Reis
Mr. Tim Reis
Mr. Tim Reis
Mr. Tim Reis
Mr. Tim Reis
Mr. Tim Reis
Eastern Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Eastern Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Eastern Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Eastern Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Eastern Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Eastern Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Eastern Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Eastern Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
107
DRAFT 02/01/05
Lutra canadensis
Lynx rufus
Mr. Tim Reis
Mr. Tim Reis
Didelphis virginiana
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan
Dr. Philip Myers
Sylvilagus floridanus
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan
Dr. Philip Myers
Lepus americanus
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan
Dr. Philip Myers
Tamias minimus
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan
Dr. Philip Myers
Tamias striatus
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan
Dr. Philip Myers
Marmota monax
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan
Dr. Philip Myers
Spermophilus tridecemlineatus
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan
Dr. Philip Myers
Sciurus carolinensis
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan
Dr. Philip Myers
Sciurus niger
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan
Dr. Philip Myers
Tamiasciurus hudsonicus
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan
Dr. Philip Myers
108
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
of Zoology
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
of Zoology
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
of Zoology
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
of Zoology
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
of Zoology
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
of Zoology
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
of Zoology
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
of Zoology
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
of Zoology
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
of Zoology
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
DRAFT 02/01/05
Glaucomys volans
Glaucomys sabrinus
Mr. Robert Skillen
Mr. Robert Skillen
Castor canadensis
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan
Dr. Philip Myers
Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii Dr. Barbara Lundrigan
Dr. Philip Myers
Peromyscus maniculatus gracilis Dr. Barbara Lundrigan
Dr. Philip Myers
Peromyscus leucopus
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan
Dr. Philip Myers
Clethrionomys gapperi
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan
Dr. Philip Myers
Microtus pennsylvanicus
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan
Dr. Philip Myers
Microtus ochrogaster
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan
Dr. Philip Myers
Microtus pinetorum
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan
Dr. Philip Myers
Ondatra zibethicus
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan
Dr. Philip Myers
Synaptomys cooperi
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan
Dr. Philip Myers
109
Michigan State Univ. Dept. of Zoology
Michigan State Univ. Dept. of Zoology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
of Zoology
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
of Zoology
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
of Zoology
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
of Zoology
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
of Zoology
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
of Zoology
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
of Zoology
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
of Zoology
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
of Zoology
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
of Zoology
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
DRAFT 02/01/05
Zapus hudsonius
Napaeozapus insignis
Erethizon dorsatum
Sorex cinereus
Sorex palustris
Sorex fumeus
Sorex arcticus
Sorex hoyi
Blarina brevicauda
Cryptotis parva
Scalopus aquaticus
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan of Zoology
Dr. Philip Myers
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan of Zoology
Dr. Philip Myers
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan of Zoology
Dr. Philip Myers
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan of Zoology
Dr. Philip Myers
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan of Zoology
Dr. Philip Myers
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan of Zoology
Dr. Philip Myers
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan of Zoology
Dr. Philip Myers
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan of Zoology
Dr. Philip Myers
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan of Zoology
Dr. Philip Myers
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan of Zoology
Dr. Philip Myers
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan of Zoology
110
DRAFT 02/01/05
Dr. Philip Myers
Condylura cristata
Cervus elaphus
Odocoileus virginianus
Alces alces
Birds
Cathartes aura
Pandion haliaetus
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
Michigan State Univ. Museum & Dept.
Dr. Barbara Lundrigan of Zoology
Dr. Philip Myers
Univ. of Michigan Museum of Zoology
& Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology
Dr. Dean Beyer
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Mr. Brent Rudolph
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Dr. Dean Beyer
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Mr. David Cuthrell
Mr. David Cuthrell
Ms. Lori Sargent
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Mr. David Cuthrell
Circus cyaneus
Mr. David Cuthrell
Accipiter striatus
Mr. David Cuthrell
Accipiter cooperii
Mr. David Cuthrell
Accipiter gentilis
Mr. David Cuthrell
Buteo lineatus
Mr. David Cuthrell
Buteo platypterus
Mr. David Cuthrell
Buteo jamaicensis
Mr. David Cuthrell
Falco sparverius
Mr. David Cuthrell
Falco columbarius
Dr. Michael Hamas
Mr. David Cuthrell
Falco peregrinus
Mr. David Cuthrell
Ms. Lori Sargent
Botaurus lentiginosus
Mr. Michael Monfils
Ixobrychus exilis
Mr. Michael Monfils
Ardea herodias
Mr. Michael Monfils
Nycticorax nycticorax
Mr. Michael Monfils
Sturnella neglecta
Mr. Michael Monfils
Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus Mr. Michael Monfils
Poecile hudsonicus
Dr. Michael Hamas
Baeolophus bicolor
Dr. Michael Hamas
Sitta carolinensis
Dr. Michael Hamas
Contopus cooperi
Dr. Michael Hamas
Empidonax virescens
Dr. Michael Hamas
Empidonax traillii
Dr. Michael Hamas
Larus delawarensis
Dr. Kelly Millenbah
Larus argentatus
Sterna caspia
Dr. Kelly Millenbah
Dr. Michael Hamas
Dr. Kelly Millenbah
Sterna hirundo
Dr. Kelly Millenbah
111
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Central Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Central Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Central Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Central Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Central Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Central Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Central Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Michigan State Univ. Dept. of Fisheries
& Wildlife
Michigan State Univ. Dept. of Fisheries
& Wildlife
Central Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Michigan State Univ. Dept. of Fisheries
& Wildlife
Michigan State Univ. Dept. of Fisheries
& Wildlife
DRAFT 02/01/05
Sterna forsteri
Dr. Kelly Millenbah
Chlidonias niger
Perisoreus canadensis
Regulus satrapa
Regulus calendula
Polioptila caerulea
Gavia immer
Dr. Kelly Millenbah
Dr. Michael Hamas
Dr. Michael Hamas
Dr. Michael Hamas
Dr. Michael Hamas
Dr. Michael Hamas
Mr. Michael Monfils
Dr. Michael Hamas
Mr. David Cuthrell
Mr. David Cuthrell
Mr. David Cuthrell
Mr. David Cuthrell
Mr. David Cuthrell
Mr. David Cuthrell
Mr. David Cuthrell
Mr. Al Stewart
Mr. Michael Monfils
Dr. Michael Hamas
Mr. Al Stewart
Mr. Al Stewart
Dr. Michael Hamas
Mr. Al Stewart
Mr. Al Stewart
Mr. Al Stewart
Dr. Michael Hamas
Otus asio
Bubo virginianus
Strix varia
Strix nebulosa
Asio otus
Asio flammeus
Aegolius acadicus
Phasianus colchicus
Falcipennis canadensis
Bonasa umbellus
Tympanuchus phasianellus
Meleagris gallopavo
Colinus virginianus
Charadrius melodus
Dr. Kelly Millenbah
Coturnicops noveboracensis
Rallus elegans
Rallus limicola
Porzana carolina
Gallinula chloropus
Fulica americana
Phalaropus tricolor
Ammodramus savannarum
Ammodramus henslowii
Ammodramus leconteii
Cygnus buccinator
Branta canadensis
Aix sponsa
Anas crecca
Anas rubripes
Ms. Nicole Lamp
Mr. Michael Monfils
Mr. Michael Monfils
Mr. Michael Monfils
Mr. Michael Monfils
Mr. Michael Monfils
Mr. Michael Monfils
Dr. Michael Hamas
Mr. Michael Monfils
Mr. Michael Monfils
Mr. Michael Monfils
Mr. Michael Monfils
Mr. Greg Soulliere
Mr. Greg Soulliere
Mr. Greg Soulliere
Mr. Greg Soulliere
Mr. Greg Soulliere
112
Michigan State Univ. Dept. of Fisheries
& Wildlife
Michigan State Univ. Dept. of Fisheries
& Wildlife
Central Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Central Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Central Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Central Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Central Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Central Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Central Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Central Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Central Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Michigan State Univ. Dept. of Fisheries
& Wildlife
Michigan State Univ. Dept. of Fisheries
& Wildlife
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Central Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
DRAFT 02/01/05
Anas platyrhynchos
Anas acuta
Anas discors
Anas clypeata
Anas strepera
Anas americana
Aythya americana
Aythya collaris
Bucephala clangula
Lophodytes cucullatus
Mergus merganser
Mergus serrator
Oxyura jamaicensis
Catharus ustulatus
Vireo flavifrons
Parula americana
Mr. Greg Soulliere
Mr. Greg Soulliere
Mr. Greg Soulliere
Mr. Greg Soulliere
Mr. Greg Soulliere
Mr. Greg Soulliere
Mr. Greg Soulliere
Mr. Greg Soulliere
Mr. Greg Soulliere
Mr. Greg Soulliere
Mr. Greg Soulliere
Mr. Greg Soulliere
Mr. Greg Soulliere
Dr. Michael Hamas
Dr. Michael Hamas
Dr. Michael Hamas
Dendroica magnolia
Dr. Dave Ewert
Dendroica caerulescens
Dendroica coronata
Dendroica virens
Dendroica kirtlandii
Dendroica discolor
Dendroica cerulea
Protonotaria citrea
Seiurus motacilla
Wilsonia citrina
Dr. Dave Ewert
Dr. Michael Hamas
Dr. Michael Hamas
Mr. Michael Monfils
Dr. Michael Hamas
Mr. Michael Monfils
Mr. Michael Monfils
Dr. Michael Hamas
Mr. Michael Monfils
Mr. Michael Monfils
Wilsonia canadensis
Melanerpes carolinus
Picoides arcticus
Thryothorus ludovicianus
Troglodytes troglodytes
Cistothorus platensis
Cistothorus palustris
Dr. Dave Ewert
Dr. Michael Hamas
Mr. Michael Monfils
Dr. Michael Hamas
Dr. Michael Hamas
Mr. Michael Monfils
Mr. Michael Monfils
113
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Michigan DNR, Wildlife Division
Central Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Central Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Central Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
The Nature Conservancy, Michigan
Field Office
The Nature Conservancy, Michigan
Field Office
Central Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Central Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Central Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Central Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
The Nature Conservancy, Michigan
Field Office
Central Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Central Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Central Michigan Univ. Dept. of Biology
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
Michigan Natural Features Inventory
DRAFT 02/01/05
Appendix E. Cross-walk of the MIWILD-HAB habitat classes to the IFMAP/GAP
habitat classes. Attribute values for the IFMAP land cover are also provided.
MI-WILD Habitat Class
Savanna
Upland Brush
Grass
Row Crops
Small Grains/Forage Crops
Fields/Pastures
Rock Bluffs
Lake Dunes
Residential
IFMAP Habitat Class
IFMAP Value
Herbaceous Openland
10
Upland Shrub/Low Density Trees
12
Herbaceous Openland
10
Row Crops
6
Forage Crops/Non-tilled herb.ag.
7
Forage Crops/Non-tilled herb.ag.
7
Exposed Rock
32
Sand, Soil
31
Low Intensity Urban
1
High Intensity Urban
2
Parks/Golf Courses
13
Open Water
Water
23
Emergent Wetlands (Marsh 1 and 2)
Emergent Wetland
29
Mixed Non-forest Wetland
30
Floating Aquatic
27
Sedge Meadow
Mixed Non-forest Wetland
30
Emergent Wetland
29
Lowland Brush
Lowland Shrub
28
Bog
Emergent Wetland
29
Mixed Non-forest Wetland
30
Shorelines & Mudflats
Sand, Soil
31
Mudflats
33
Treed Bog
Lowland Coniferous Forest
25
Aspen
Aspen Association
16
Paper Birch
Other Upland Deciduous
17
Oak
Oak Association
15
Assorted Hardwoods
Mixed Upland Deciduous
18
Northern Hardwoods
Northern Hardwood Association
14
Spruce/Fir
Other Upland Conifers
20
Hemlock
Other Upland Conifers
20
Jack Pine
Pines
19
Red Pine
Pines
19
White Pine
Pines
19
Conifer Plantations
Pines
19
Mixed Upland Hardwoods
Mixed Upland Deciduous
18
Mixed Northern Hardwoods
Northern Hardwood Association
14
Upland Mixed Forest
22
Mixed Upland Conifer
Mixed Upland Conifers
21
Upland Mixed Forest
22
Mixed Pine
Pines
19
Upland Mixed Forest
22
Swamp Hardwoods
Lowland Deciduous Forest
24
Balsam Poplar & Swamp Aspen & Swamp Birch Lowland Deciduous Forest
24
114
DRAFT 02/01/05
Bottomland Hardwoods
Tamarack
Northern White Cedar
Black Spruce
Mixed Lowland Conifer
Mixed Lowland Hardwoods
Lowland Deciduous Forest
Lowland Coniferous Forest
Lowland Coniferous Forest
Lowland Coniferous Forest
Lowland Coniferous Forest
Lowland Mixed Forest
Lowland Deciduous Forest
Lowland Mixed Forest
115
24
25
25
25
25
26
24
26
DRAFT 02/01/05
Appendix F. Table of land cover and stewardship analysis. The area in square kilometers
(multiply by 100 for hectares, 247 for acres) of the land cover mapped by management
status and land steward, and the percent of the land cover total in each category.
116
DRAFT 02/01/05
Airports
MiDNR
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
0.15
0.42
Status 3
0.79
2.14
Status 4
0.00
0.00
Total
0.94
2.56
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.02
0.04
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.00
0.75
0.00
0.00
35.01
95.37
35.01
95.37
2.03
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.42
0.00
0.00
1.53
4.17
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
35.02 95.41
0.75
2.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
36.71 100.00
Aspen Types
MiDNR
Status 1
59.29
0.58
Status 2
35.11
0.34
Status 3
1971.99
19.19
Status 4
Total
3.45
0.03
2069.85
20.15
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
2.28
30.89
0.30
30.89
0.30
0.13
0.00
100.95
0.98
101.08
0.98
2.28
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.02
0.02
5.88
6591.18
64.15
6591.18
64.15
0.06
USNPS
Total
217.64
2.12
285.09
2.77
23.68
0.23
58.79
0.57
0.06
1225.37
11.93
0.49
0.00
6.06
1225.37
11.93
6.37
0.06
247.37
3234.93 31.49
6695.58 65.17
2.41 10274.39 100.00
Emergent Wetland
MiDNR
Status 1
0.27
0.02
Status 2
5.48
0.51
Status 3
116.67
10.77
Status 4
Total
0.01
0.00
122.43
11.30
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
1.07
0.04
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.02
0.00
15.36
1.42
15.38
1.42
1.07
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.10
0.10
4.45
877.85
81.01
877.85
81.01
0.41
USNPS
Total
14.89
1.37
20.67
1.91
0.96
0.09
6.44
0.59
0.00
43.84
4.05
2.71
0.25
0.04
43.84
4.05
7.16
0.66
15.88
163.33 15.07
893.22 82.43
1.47 1083.66 100.00
Exposed Rock
MiDNR
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
0.00
0.00
Status 3
0.08
0.37
Status 4
0.00
0.00
Total
0.08
0.37
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.01
0.05
0.05
0.22
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.07
0.02
0.07
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.04
0.02
0.01
0.04
18.04
82.85
18.04
82.85
0.11
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
3.31 15.22
3.32 15.25
0.24
1.12
0.24
1.12
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.71
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
18.05 82.92
0.02
0.11
0.00
0.00
3.56 16.33
21.77 100.00
USFWS
USNPS
Total
7.56
0.12
0.03
9.54
2.14
0.45
0.10
3.15
0.71
Floating Aquatic Wetland
MiDNR
Status 1
0.57
0.13
Status 2
2.71
0.61
Status 3
81.24
18.24
Status 4
Total
0.01
0.00
84.52
18.97
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
1.30
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
8.21
1.84
8.21
1.84
1.30
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.29
0.29
328.08
73.65
328.08
73.65
1.70
14.00
3.14
1.13
0.25
0.08
0.02
96.49 21.66
14.00
3.14
8.69
1.95
0.65
0.15
445.48 100.00
336.30 75.49
Forage Crops
MiDNR
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
26.19
0.12
Status 3
104.72
0.49
Status 4
0.80
0.00
131.71
0.62
Total
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
1.24
0.30
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
89.84
0.42
89.84
0.42
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.01
11.96
1.24
0.01
21080.58
98.87
21080.58
98.87
117
0.06
USFWS
USNPS
0.35
0.00
0.00
1.59
0.01
1.79
0.01
27.98
0.13
0.00
0.00
121.33
0.57
4.35
0.00
0.02
Total
21171.22 99.29
11.96
0.06
4.70
0.02
1.79
0.01 21322.12 100.00
DRAFT 02/01/05
Herbaceous Open Land
MiDNR
Status 1
1.10
0.01
Status 2
37.94
0.34
Status 3
1064.18
9.65
Status 4
Total
0.68
0.01
1103.90
10.01
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
1.85
77.56
0.70
77.56
0.70
0.06
0.00
110.93
1.01
110.99
1.01
1.85
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.02
0.02
9333.68
84.60
9333.68
84.60
USFWS
USNPS
Total
5.68
1.52
0.01
10.16
0.09
23.07
0.21
61.01
0.55
0.01
0.05
372.23
3.37
1.79
0.02
0.82
372.23
3.37
7.47
0.07
25.41
1516.63 13.75
9445.29 85.61
0.23 11033.08 100.00
High Intensity Urban
MiDNR
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
3.42
0.24
Status 3
6.39
0.45
Status 4
0.00
0.00
Total
9.81
0.70
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.07
0.15
0.15
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
11.49
0.82
11.49
0.82
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.01
0.52
0.07
0.01
1382.39
98.41
1382.39
98.41
0.04
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.12
0.01
0.04
0.00
3.46
0.25
0.02
0.00
7.31
0.52
0.23
0.00
0.02
Total
1393.88 99.23
0.52
0.04
0.23
0.02
0.11
0.01 1404.77 100.00
Low Intensity Urban
MiDNR
Status 1
0.02
0.00
Status 2
6.78
0.31
Status 3
31.35
1.44
Status 4
0.11
0.01
38.26
1.75
Total
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.17
0.77
0.77
0.04
0.04
0.00
0.00
27.68
1.27
27.68
1.27
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.01
12.30
0.17
0.01
2102.91
96.31
2102.91
96.31
0.56
USFWS
USNPS
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.23
0.01
0.65
0.03
7.43
0.34
0.02
0.00
45.19
2.07
0.75
0.00
0.03
Total
2130.71 97.58
12.30
0.56
0.79
0.04
0.66
0.03 2183.55 100.00
Lowland Coniferous Forest
MiDNR
Status 1
20.61
0.22
Status 2
61.92
0.67
Status 3
2336.10
25.12
Status 4
Total
3.30
0.04
2421.95
26.04
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
14.02
9.44
0.10
9.44
0.10
1.85
0.02
101.04
1.09
102.89
1.11
14.02
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.15
0.15
20.95
5275.49
56.72
5275.49
56.72
0.23
USNPS
Total
73.23
0.79
128.82
1.38
16.01
0.17
77.93
0.84
0.10
1358.05
14.60
0.15
0.00
9.09
1358.05
14.60
21.10
0.23
98.33
3714.69 39.94
5379.83 57.84
1.06 9301.28 100.00
Lowland Deciduous Forest
MiDNR
Status 1
0.66
0.01
Status 2
28.57
0.39
Status 3
1048.72
14.34
Status 4
Total
0.53
0.01
1078.47
14.75
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
5.60
3.86
0.05
3.86
0.05
0.33
0.00
87.09
1.19
87.42
1.20
5.60
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.08
0.08
5829.29
79.70
5829.29
79.70
USFWS
USNPS
0.26
0.00
0.00
6.51
0.09
7.98
0.11
36.55
0.50
0.07
0.00
289.86
3.96
6.11
0.08
5.01
289.86
3.96
6.37
0.09
12.98
Total
1353.88 18.51
5916.92 80.90
0.18 7313.86 100.00
Lowland Mixed Forest
MiDNR
Status 1
0.69
0.13
Status 2
3.63
0.69
Status 3
107.28
20.50
Status 4
Total
0.09
0.02
111.68
21.34
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.58
0.55
0.11
0.55
0.11
0.02
0.00
5.03
0.96
5.05
0.96
0.58
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.11
0.11
USFWS
1.01
319.43
61.03
319.43
61.03
118
0.19
USNPS
Total
18.18
3.47
20.46
3.91
1.35
0.26
4.98
0.95
65.16
12.45
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.07
173.39 33.13
65.16
12.45
1.01
0.19
19.93
3.81
523.38 100.00
324.55 62.01
DRAFT 02/01/05
Mixed Non-forest Wetland
MiDNR
Status 1
14.94
0.48
Status 2
24.41
0.79
Status 3
959.15
30.84
Status 4
Total
0.86
0.03
999.36
32.13
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
4.58
3.75
0.12
3.75
0.12
0.08
0.00
35.40
1.14
35.48
1.14
4.58
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.15
0.15
167.95
1564.81
50.32
1564.81
50.32
5.40
USNPS
Total
0.02
0.00
187.48
6.03
2.49
0.08
26.91
0.87
328.92
10.58
1.35
0.04
1.26
0.04
1294.50 41.62
328.92
10.58 169.30
5.44
3.77
0.12 3109.96 100.00
1601.07 51.48
Mixed Upland Conifer
MiDNR
Status 1
1.80
0.22
Status 2
4.80
0.59
Status 3
187.52
22.94
Status 4
Total
0.24
0.03
194.36
23.78
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.83
0.55
0.07
0.55
0.07
0.00
0.00
10.66
1.30
10.66
1.30
0.83
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.10
0.10
470.26
57.53
470.26
57.53
USFWS
USNPS
1.23
0.00
0.00
3.86
0.47
4.09
0.50
8.89
1.09
0.15
Total
131.51
16.09
0.00
0.00
3.99
0.49
323.57 39.58
131.51
16.09
1.23
0.15
8.08
0.99
817.48 100.00
481.16 58.86
Mixed Upland Deciduous
MiDNR
Status 1
0.11
0.00
Status 2
15.13
0.35
Status 3
342.89
7.94
0.23
0.01
358.37
8.30
Status 4
Total
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
1.33
2.11
0.05
2.11
0.05
0.02
0.00
29.99
0.69
30.00
0.69
1.33
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.03
0.03
3782.44
87.61
3782.44
87.61
USFWS
USNPS
0.91
0.67
0.02
3.02
0.07
5.09
0.12
20.22
0.47
0.02
Total
131.19
3.04
4.11
0.10
1.39
0.03
481.69 11.16
131.19
3.04
5.01
0.12
7.14
0.17 4317.59 100.00
3812.66 88.31
Mud Flats
MiDNR
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
0.00
0.00
Status 3
0.00
0.00
Status 4
0.00
0.00
Total
0.00
0.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.00
0.00
0.02
8.70
0.02
8.70
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
0.17
91.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.17 91.30
0.17
91.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.19 100.00
0.02
8.70
Non-vegetated Farmland
MiDNR
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
0.21
0.09
Status 3
1.67
0.70
Status 4
0.00
0.00
Total
1.88
0.79
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.00
0.05
0.05
0.02
0.02
0.00
0.00
3.43
1.45
3.43
1.45
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.00
0.22
0.00
0.00
231.06
97.61
231.06
97.61
0.09
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.09
0.00
0.00
2.00
0.85
0.06
0.00
0.03
Total
234.50 99.07
0.22
0.09
0.06
0.03
0.00
0.00
236.71 100.00
Northern Hardwood
MiDNR
Status 1
127.81
0.74
Status 2
49.49
0.29
Status 3
2028.76
11.74
Status 4
Total
0.87
0.01
2206.93
12.77
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
4.69
13.58
0.08
13.58
0.08
0.38
0.00
125.83
0.73
126.21
0.73
4.69
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.03
0.03
USFWS
3.82
12434.25
71.93
12434.25
71.93
119
0.02
USNPS
Total
35.95
0.21
172.26
1.00
169.40
0.98
218.89
1.27
0.53
2199.01
12.72
1.84
0.01
91.68
2199.01
12.72
5.65
0.03
297.03
4335.25 25.08
12560.95 72.66
1.72 17287.36 100.00
DRAFT 02/01/05
Oaks Types
MiDNR
Status 1
2.64
0.04
Status 2
29.46
0.47
Status 3
967.46
15.43
Status 4
Total
2.27
0.04
1001.83
15.98
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.27
57.96
0.92
57.96
0.92
0.04
0.00
57.39
0.92
57.43
0.92
0.27
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.00
0.00
0.04
4471.82
71.32
4471.82
71.32
0.00
USNPS
Total
11.47
0.18
14.42
0.23
0.19
0.00
29.65
0.47
0.01
668.14
10.66
0.62
0.01
0.62
668.14
10.66
0.66
0.01
12.28
1694.84 27.03
4531.47 72.27
0.20 6270.39 100.00
Orchards/Vineyards/Nursery
MiDNR
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
0.93
0.13
Status 3
6.34
0.86
Status 4
0.00
0.00
Total
7.27
0.99
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.61
0.49
3.61
0.49
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
724.94
98.49
724.94
98.49
0.00
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.23
0.03
1.16
0.16
0.00
0.00
6.34
0.86
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
728.55 98.98
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.23
0.03
736.06 100.00
Other Bare/Sparsely Vegetated
MiDNR
Status 1
0.27
0.14
Status 2
1.84
0.98
Status 3
5.88
3.13
Status 4
0.00
0.00
Total
7.99
4.25
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.01
1.60
3.01
1.60
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.12
5.52
0.22
0.12
169.01
89.88
169.01
89.88
2.94
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.49
0.26
2.28
1.21
4.12
2.19
0.01
0.00
11.42
6.07
0.01
0.00
0.00
Total
172.01 91.48
5.52
2.94
0.01
0.00
2.29
1.22
188.04 100.00
Other Upland Conifer
MiDNR
Status 1
6.93
0.46
Status 2
2.79
0.19
Status 3
186.19
12.49
Status 4
Total
0.01
0.00
195.92
13.14
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
3.05
0.02
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.07
0.00
24.84
1.67
24.92
1.67
3.05
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.20
0.20
0.19
840.10
56.34
840.10
56.34
0.01
USNPS
Total
55.02
3.69
65.19
4.37
0.40
0.03
3.19
0.21
0.07
370.47
24.84
0.02
0.00
1.09
370.47
24.84
0.22
0.01
56.50
557.86 37.41
864.95 58.00
3.79 1491.19 100.00
Other Upland Deciduous
MiDNR
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
0.45
0.27
Status 3
14.26
8.75
Status 4
0.00
0.00
14.70
9.02
Total
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.88
0.54
0.88
0.54
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.01
0.03
0.02
0.01
146.93
90.16
146.93
90.16
0.02
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.45
0.27
0.00
0.00
14.69
9.01
0.40
0.00
0.24
Total
147.82 90.70
0.03
0.02
0.40
0.24
0.00
0.00
162.97 100.00
Parks and Golf Courses
MiDNR
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
0.26
0.08
Status 3
0.79
0.25
Status 4
0.00
0.00
Total
1.05
0.33
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.20
0.38
1.20
0.38
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
313.12
99.25
313.12
99.25
120
0.02
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.26
0.08
0.01
0.00
0.91
0.29
0.04
0.00
0.01
Total
314.32 99.63
0.06
0.02
0.04
0.01
0.01
0.00
315.49 100.00
DRAFT 02/01/05
Pine Types
MiDNR
Status 1
9.42
0.11
Status 2
37.29
0.45
Status 3
1985.59
23.74
Status 4
Total
1.34
0.02
2033.63
24.32
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
7.27
39.80
0.48
39.80
0.48
0.09
0.00
89.69
1.07
89.78
1.07
7.27
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.09
0.09
39.79
4145.20
49.57
4145.20
49.57
0.48
USNPS
Total
10.79
0.13
67.26
0.80
16.56
0.20
53.85
0.64
1966.54
23.52
0.65
0.01
12.51
0.15
4005.18 47.89
1966.54
23.52
40.44
0.48
39.86
0.48 8362.52 100.00
4236.23 50.66
Roads/Parking Lots
MiDNR
Status 1
0.96
0.02
Status 2
16.12
0.38
Status 3
131.70
3.11
Status 4
0.24
0.01
149.02
3.52
Total
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.40
3.02
3.02
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.00
47.37
1.12
47.44
1.12
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.01
82.27
0.40
0.01
3946.69
93.25
3946.69
93.25
1.94
USFWS
USNPS
0.06
0.00
0.00
1.42
0.03
2.43
0.06
18.55
0.44
0.72
0.02
217.92
5.15
0.14
0.00
0.00
Total
3994.30 94.38
82.27
1.94
0.19
0.00
3.15
0.07 4232.19 100.00
Row Crops
MiDNR
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
7.48
0.05
Status 3
67.83
0.42
Status 4
0.24
0.00
75.55
0.47
Total
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
1.13
0.28
0.28
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
43.50
0.27
43.50
0.27
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.01
1.61
1.13
0.01
15998.74
99.22
15998.74
99.22
0.01
USFWS
USNPS
0.01
0.00
0.00
1.13
0.01
0.03
0.00
7.51
0.05
0.00
0.00
73.68
0.46
3.96
0.00
0.02
Total
16042.48 99.49
1.61
0.01
3.97
0.02
0.03
0.00 16124.80 100.00
Sand/Soil
MiDNR
Status 1
0.03
0.01
Status 2
21.64
5.15
Status 3
16.17
3.85
Status 4
0.07
0.02
37.92
9.02
Total
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.64
2.62
2.62
0.62
0.62
0.00
0.00
8.94
2.13
8.94
2.13
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.15
9.46
0.64
0.15
336.12
79.99
336.12
79.99
2.25
USFWS
USNPS
0.34
0.00
0.00
24.13
5.74
0.04
0.01
0.01
0.08
0.00
Total
1.01
0.24
45.77 10.89
28.29
6.73
345.13 82.13
9.46
2.25
0.35
0.08
24.17
5.75
420.21 100.00
Shrub Wetland
MiDNR
Status 1
30.22
0.48
Status 2
34.39
0.55
Status 3
1299.98
20.74
Status 4
Total
1.28
0.02
1365.87
21.79
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
4.08
4.14
0.07
4.14
0.07
0.14
0.00
78.30
1.25
78.44
1.25
4.08
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.07
0.07
92.68
4166.88
66.47
4166.88
66.47
1.48
USNPS
Total
4.56
0.07
131.54
2.10
6.61
0.11
41.00
0.65
0.10
535.73
8.55
3.70
0.06
6.06
535.73
8.55
96.38
1.54
17.23
1849.75 29.51
4246.47 67.74
0.27 6268.76 100.00
Upland Mixed Forest
MiDNR
Status 1
29.43
0.38
Status 2
28.32
0.36
Status 3
1175.16
15.04
Status 4
Total
0.80
0.01
1233.71
15.79
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
2.75
27.14
0.35
27.14
0.35
0.16
0.00
95.74
1.23
95.90
1.23
2.75
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.04
0.04
USFWS
1.68
5010.53
64.12
5010.53
64.12
121
0.02
USNPS
Total
62.52
0.80
96.37
1.23
18.66
0.24
46.98
0.60
0.04
1357.53
17.37
0.14
0.00
3.14
1357.53
17.37
1.82
0.02
84.32
2563.27 32.80
5107.07 65.36
1.08 7813.70 100.00
DRAFT 02/01/05
Upland Shrub and Low Density Trees
MiDNR
Status 1
1.05
0.03
Status 2
9.95
0.25
Status 3
790.41
20.12
Status 4
Total
0.29
0.01
801.71
20.41
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.57
19.07
0.49
19.07
0.49
0.03
0.00
39.88
1.02
39.91
1.02
0.57
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.01
0.01
5.53
2816.05
71.69
2816.05
71.69
0.14
USNPS
Total
18.49
0.47
25.64
0.65
7.31
0.19
17.26
0.44
0.21
211.09
5.37
0.14
0.00
8.30
211.09
5.37
5.67
0.14
34.10
1029.05 26.20
2856.22 72.71
0.87 3928.18 100.00
Water
MiDNR
Status 1
5.78
0.16
Status 2
16.64
0.47
Status 3
189.11
5.38
Status 4
0.23
0.01
211.76
6.03
Total
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
1.73
1.65
1.65
0.05
0.05
0.07
0.00
65.55
1.87
65.62
1.87
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
18.33
90.02
1.73
USFWS
0.05
0.05
3038.59
86.52
3038.59
86.52
122
2.56
3.21
0.52
0.09
USNPS
Total
42.20
1.20
68.04
1.94
38.18
1.09
54.82
1.56
0.83
0.02
284.90
8.11
3104.37 88.39
90.02
2.56
21.54
0.61
81.22
2.31 3512.13 100.00
DRAFT 02/01/05
Appendix G. Table of amphibian and reptile species distribution and stewardship
analysis. The area in square kilometers (multiply by 100 for hectares, 247 for acres) of the
species' mapped distribution by management status and land steward, and the percent of
the species' total distribution in each category.
aaaaa01060
Blue-spotted salamander
MiDNR
Status 1
197.78
0.39
Status 2
210.44
0.42
Status 3
8337.21
16.53
Status 4
Total
7.35
0.01
8752.78
17.35
aaaaa01090
Status 1
221.42
0.48
Status 2
158.88
0.35
Status 3
6502.13
14.20
Total
7.76
0.02
6890.19
15.05
aaaaa01100
Nature
Conservancy
36.24
59.74
0.12
59.74
0.12
2.86
0.01
522.87
1.04
525.73
1.04
36.24
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.07
0.07
75.54
34082.26
67.56
34082.26
67.56
USNPS
Total
0.15 262.58
0.52
572.14
1.13
230.06
0.46
440.50
0.87
6288.67
12.47
9.84
0.02 120.35
0.24
14818.67 29.38
6288.67
12.47
85.38
0.17 612.99
1.22
50443.79 100.00
34612.48 68.62
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
11.95
133.01
0.29
133.01
0.29
0.79
0.00
411.63
0.90
412.42
0.90
11.95
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.03
0.03
12.55
32411.02
70.80
32411.02
70.80
0.03
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
245.92
0.54
221.11
0.48
379.99
0.83
5579.18
12.19
7.72
0.02 102.27
0.22
12325.10 26.92
5579.18
12.19
20.27
0.04 323.38
0.71
45781.42 100.00
32830.41 71.71
Marbled salamander
MiDNR
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
8.63
0.49
Status 3
142.90
8.09
Status 4
0.00
0.00
151.53
8.58
Total
MiOther
Spotted salamander
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
5.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
23.70
1.34
23.70
1.34
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.29
0.00
5.06
0.29
1586.77
89.80
1586.77
89.80
123
0.00
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.06
0.29
0.00
0.00
8.63
0.49
0.00
0.00
142.90
8.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
1610.47 91.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1767.06 100.00
DRAFT 02/01/05
aaaaa01130
Smallmouth salamander
MiDNR
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
0.36
0.05
Status 3
41.71
5.50
Status 4
0.00
0.00
42.07
5.55
Total
aaaaa01140
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
200.35
0.35
Status 3
5464.32
9.59
8.54
0.01
5673.21
9.96
Total
aaaad08010
Status 1
184.33
0.47
Status 2
163.50
0.42
Status 3
6635.22
17.04
Total
5.77
0.01
6988.82
17.94
aaaad12020
Status 1
167.31
0.61
Status 2
85.30
0.31
Status 3
3576.39
13.13
Total
2.13
0.01
3831.13
14.06
aaaae01040
Status 1
5.70
0.18
Status 2
16.64
0.52
Status 3
178.02
5.59
Status 4
0.19
0.01
200.55
6.29
aaaaf01030
Status 1
284.20
0.33
Status 2
360.79
0.43
Status 3 14284.82
16.84
Total
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.47
0.46
3.47
0.46
0.00
2.49
0.33
710.57
93.67
710.57
93.67
0.00
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.49
0.33
0.00
0.00
0.36
0.05
0.00
0.00
41.71
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
714.04 94.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
758.60 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
18.69
239.53
0.42
239.53
0.42
0.27
0.00
445.12
0.78
445.39
0.78
18.69
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.03
0.03
47695.63
83.71
47695.63
83.71
USFWS
USNPS
0.96
0.00
0.00
19.65
0.03
268.24
0.47
468.59
0.82
0.00
Total
2491.60
4.37
26.31
0.05 118.53
0.21
8340.56 14.64
2491.60
4.37
27.27
0.05 386.77
0.68
56978.09 100.00
48149.29 84.50
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
28.50
57.67
0.15
57.67
0.15
2.40
0.01
380.52
0.98
382.92
0.98
28.50
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.07
0.07
59.59
25818.56
66.29
25818.56
66.29
0.15
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
272.42
0.70
213.63
0.55
377.13
0.97
5279.18
13.56
8.84
0.02 108.56
0.28
12091.87 31.05
5279.18
13.56
68.43
0.18 322.19
0.83
38946.27 100.00
26204.85 67.28
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
11.74
42.25
0.16
42.25
0.16
0.64
0.00
257.66
0.95
258.30
0.95
11.74
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.04
0.04
18740.67
68.78
18740.67
68.78
USFWS
USNPS
7.40
0.00
0.00
186.45
0.68
196.38
0.72
281.68
1.03
0.03
Total
4056.44
14.89
1.98
0.01
99.53
0.37
7777.23 28.54
4056.44
14.89
9.38
0.03 295.91
1.09
27245.82 100.00
19000.46 69.74
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
2.75
1.70
1.70
0.05
0.05
0.02
0.00
64.13
2.01
64.15
2.01
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
22.37
82.25
2.75
USFWS
0.09
0.09
2796.29
87.77
2796.29
87.77
2.58
3.95
0.70
0.12
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
30.82
0.97
11.14
0.35
27.78
0.87
0.93
0.03
266.87
8.38
2860.61 89.78
82.25
2.58
26.32
0.83
12.07
0.38
3186.08 100.00
Eastern newt
MiDNR
Status 4
0.00
USFS
0.33
Mudpuppy
MiDNR
Total
2.49
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Redback salamander
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Four-toed salamander
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Eastern tiger salamander
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
15.06
0.02
14944.87
17.61
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
53.27
193.72
0.23
193.72
0.23
3.29
0.00
889.77
1.05
893.06
1.05
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.06
10496.29
53.27
0.06
USFWS
290.38
57020.27
67.20
57020.27
67.20 10496.29
124
USNPS
Total
0.34 504.64
0.59
1132.49
1.33
287.34
0.34
648.13
0.76
23.66
0.03 141.29
0.17
25143.07 29.63
12.37 314.04
0.37 933.27
1.10
84848.79 100.00
12.37
57925.10 68.27
DRAFT 02/01/05
aaaag02010
Western lesser siren
MiDNR
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
0.28
0.09
Status 3
12.03
3.71
Status 4
0.00
0.00
12.31
3.80
Total
aaabb01020
Status 1
242.60
0.23
Status 2
317.92
0.31
Status 3 12012.04
11.62
Total
11.92
0.01
12584.48
12.17
aaabb01210
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
33.89
0.28
Status 3
379.62
3.14
Status 4
0.00
0.00
413.51
3.42
aaabc01010
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
2.24
0.30
Status 3
18.06
2.42
Status 4
0.00
0.00
20.30
2.72
aaabc02130
Status 1
192.12
0.42
Status 2
189.97
0.41
Status 3
7562.11
16.42
Total
6.21
0.01
7950.41
17.27
aaabc05070
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.73
2.38
7.73
2.38
0.00
0.22
0.07
304.03
93.75
304.03
93.75
0.00
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.28
0.09
0.00
0.00
12.03
3.71
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
311.76 96.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
324.29 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
32.97
274.85
0.27
274.85
0.27
1.43
0.00
895.97
0.87
897.40
0.87
32.97
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.03
0.03
66.22
79623.57
77.03
79623.57
77.03
USNPS
Total
0.06 435.80
0.42
777.59
0.75
285.68
0.28
603.60
0.58
9013.07
8.72
21.72
0.02 134.81
0.13
21457.92 20.76
9013.07
8.72
87.94
0.09 856.29
0.83 103370.57 100.00
80531.46 77.91
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
4.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
91.44
0.76
91.44
0.76
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.04
19.56
4.37
0.04
11549.26
95.62
11549.26
95.62
0.16
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.37
0.04
0.00
0.00
33.89
0.28
0.00
0.00
399.18
3.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
11640.70 96.38
19.56
0.16
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
12078.14 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.98
1.47
10.98
1.47
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.06
0.38
0.43
0.06
714.86
95.70
714.86
95.70
0.05
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.43
0.06
0.00
0.00
2.24
0.30
0.00
0.00
18.44
2.47
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
725.84 97.17
0.38
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
746.95 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
33.70
58.43
0.13
58.43
0.13
2.75
0.01
465.27
1.01
468.02
1.02
33.70
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.07
0.07
40.07
30947.44
67.21
30947.44
67.21
USNPS
Total
0.09 250.88
0.54
516.77
1.12
225.16
0.49
415.13
0.90
5947.43
12.92
8.29
0.02 117.78
0.26
13696.79 29.74
5947.43
12.92
48.36
0.11 593.82
1.29
46047.61 100.00
31418.92 68.23
Western chorus frog
MiDNR
Status 1
2.36
0.01
Status 2
120.24
0.27
Status 3
2763.41
6.17
Status 4
2.70
0.01
2888.71
6.45
Total
0.00
USFS
0.07
Gray treefrog
MiDNR
Status 4
0.22
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Blanchard's cricket frog
MiDNR
Total
Nature
Conservancy
Fowler's toad
MiDNR
Total
MiOther
American toad
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
11.45
88.16
88.16
0.20
0.20
0.55
0.00
354.04
0.79
354.59
0.79
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.43
737.76
11.45
USFWS
0.03
0.03
40631.14
90.74
40631.14
90.74
125
1.65
19.46
0.00
0.04
USNPS
Total
15.72
0.04
29.96
0.07
31.40
0.07
151.64
0.34
0.00
0.00
3609.34
8.06
40987.88 91.53
737.76
1.65
19.89
0.04
47.12
0.11
44778.82 100.00
DRAFT 02/01/05
aaabc05090
Northern spring peeper
MiDNR
Status 1
234.49
0.42
Status 2
247.97
0.44
Status 3
9637.04
17.15
Status 4
Total
8.31
0.01
10127.81
18.03
aaabh01070
Status 1
12.59
0.17
Status 2
32.26
0.43
Status 3
592.85
7.88
0.80
0.01
638.50
8.49
Total
aaabh01090
Status 1
11.71
0.19
Status 2
24.09
0.39
Status 3
416.33
6.74
0.70
0.01
452.83
7.33
Total
aaabh01160
Status 1
27.41
0.23
Status 2
61.91
0.51
Status 3
1732.69
14.23
Total
1.68
0.01
1823.69
14.98
aaabh01170
Status 1
27.41
0.22
Status 2
61.91
0.51
Status 3
1732.69
14.21
Total
1.68
0.01
1823.69
14.95
aaabh01190
Status 1
27.45
0.71
Status 2
26.47
0.69
Status 3
954.06
24.77
Total
0.11
64.49
0.11
2.98
0.01
595.74
1.06
598.72
1.07
43.26
USFWS
0.08
303.55
37661.28
67.04
37661.28
67.04
USNPS
Total
0.54 271.66
0.48
852.96
1.52
233.00
0.41
480.97
0.86
6734.51
11.99
19.58
0.03 121.68
0.22
16580.28 29.51
6734.51
11.99 323.13
0.58 626.34
1.11
56179.54 100.00
38265.33 68.11
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
5.69
2.98
0.04
2.98
0.04
0.15
0.00
125.78
1.67
125.93
1.67
5.69
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.08
0.08
38.58
6375.49
84.74
6375.49
84.74
0.51
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
56.86
0.76
14.64
0.19
46.90
0.62
309.66
4.12
9.31
0.12
2.59
0.03
917.54 12.20
309.66
4.12
47.89
0.64
17.23
0.23
7523.37 100.00
6502.07 86.42
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
3.53
3.09
0.05
3.09
0.05
0.12
0.00
103.85
1.68
103.97
1.68
3.53
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.06
0.06
27.94
5299.32
85.82
5299.32
85.82
0.45
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
43.18
0.70
13.69
0.22
37.78
0.61
261.69
4.24
6.70
0.11
2.42
0.04
690.35 11.18
261.69
4.24
34.64
0.56
16.11
0.26
6175.18 100.00
5403.87 87.51
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
12.68
7.28
0.06
7.28
0.06
0.28
0.00
176.22
1.45
176.50
1.45
12.68
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.10
0.10
207.49
9226.49
75.79
9226.49
75.79
1.70
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
247.58
2.03
17.30
0.14
79.21
0.65
685.38
5.63
13.24
0.11
4.21
0.03
2443.08 20.07
685.38
5.63 220.73
1.81
21.51
0.18
12174.26 100.00
9404.39 77.25
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
12.68
7.28
0.06
7.28
0.06
0.28
0.00
176.22
1.45
176.50
1.45
12.68
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.10
0.10
207.49
9226.57
75.66
9226.57
75.66
1.70
USNPS
Total
20.48
0.17
268.06
2.20
17.30
0.14
79.21
0.65
685.38
5.62
13.24
0.11
4.21
0.03
2443.08 20.03
685.38
5.62 220.73
1.81
41.99
0.34
12194.82 100.00
9404.47 77.12
Mink frog
MiDNR
Status 4
64.49
USFS
0.08
Northern leopard frog
MiDNR
Status 4
43.26
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Pickerel frog
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Green frog
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Bullfrog
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
0.64
0.02
1008.62
26.19
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
5.57
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.00
50.15
1.30
50.30
1.31
5.57
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.14
0.14
USFWS
207.22
2019.99
52.44
2019.99
52.44
126
5.38
USNPS
Total
21.17
0.55
261.41
6.79
10.00
0.26
36.47
0.95
524.86
13.63
0.00
0.00
4.15
0.11
1483.22 38.51
524.86
13.63 207.22
5.38
35.32
0.92
3851.88 100.00
2070.78 53.76
DRAFT 02/01/05
aaabh01200
Wood frog
MiDNR
Status 1
205.85
0.40
Status 2
221.66
0.43
Status 3
8660.30
16.91
Status 4
Total
7.03
0.01
9094.84
17.75
araab01010
Status 1
20.51
0.27
Status 2
47.75
0.63
Status 3
1305.71
17.15
Total
1.04
0.01
1375.01
18.06
araad01010
Status 1
21.34
0.22
Status 2
55.21
0.58
Status 3
1547.98
16.22
Total
1.24
0.01
1625.77
17.03
araad02010
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
19.86
0.42
Status 3
391.24
8.29
0.01
0.00
411.11
8.71
Total
araad02020
Status 1
7.57
0.49
Status 2
8.71
0.56
Status 3
210.40
13.49
Total
0.40
0.03
227.08
14.56
araad04010
0.12
61.88
0.12
2.86
0.01
531.63
1.04
534.49
1.04
40.49
USFWS
0.08
220.18
34338.70
67.03
34338.70
67.03
USNPS
Total
0.43 267.46
0.52
733.98
1.43
228.41
0.45
450.07
0.88
6306.38
12.31
16.39
0.03 118.80
0.23
15166.61 29.61
6306.38
12.31 236.57
0.46 614.67
1.20
51228.02 100.00
34877.36 68.08
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
8.97
5.27
0.07
5.27
0.07
0.13
0.00
118.41
1.56
118.54
1.56
8.97
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.12
0.12
197.14
5416.92
71.16
5416.92
71.16
2.59
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
226.62
2.98
14.68
0.19
62.43
0.82
464.69
6.10
8.34
0.11
2.28
0.03
1786.42 23.47
464.69
6.10 205.48
2.70
16.96
0.22
7611.84 100.00
5536.37 72.73
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
12.03
6.38
0.07
6.38
0.07
0.17
0.00
141.57
1.48
141.74
1.48
12.03
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.13
0.13
204.29
6972.25
73.04
6972.25
73.04
2.14
USNPS
Total
20.48
0.21
258.14
2.70
15.24
0.16
70.45
0.74
532.34
5.58
12.33
0.13
2.75
0.03
2101.95 22.02
532.34
5.58 216.62
2.27
38.47
0.40
9545.60 100.00
7115.06 74.54
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
5.53
6.03
0.13
6.03
0.13
0.04
0.00
68.50
1.45
68.54
1.45
5.53
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.12
0.12
4144.90
87.80
4144.90
87.80
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.53
0.12
5.10
0.11
24.96
0.53
0.00
Total
69.94
1.48
9.55
0.20
0.00
0.00
476.80 10.10
69.94
1.48
9.55
0.20
5.10
0.11
4720.70 100.00
4213.41 89.25
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.17
1.22
0.08
1.22
0.08
0.11
0.01
30.51
1.96
30.62
1.96
0.17
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.01
0.01
1127.63
72.28
1127.63
72.28
USFWS
USNPS
Total
5.62
0.00
0.00
13.36
0.86
1.76
0.11
10.47
0.67
0.36
164.59
10.55
0.00
0.00
1.35
0.09
377.67 24.21
164.59
10.55
5.62
0.36
3.11
0.20
1560.04 100.00
1158.54 74.26
Blanding's turtle
MiDNR
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
13.97
0.49
Status 3
143.42
5.00
Status 4
0.21
0.01
157.60
5.49
Total
61.88
USFS
0.08
Wood turtle
MiDNR
Status 4
40.49
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Spotted turtle
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Painted turtle
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Snapping turtle
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
2.54
1.68
1.68
0.06
0.06
0.01
0.00
58.47
2.04
58.48
2.04
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
22.38
60.81
2.54
USFWS
0.09
0.09
2553.69
88.95
2553.69
88.95
127
2.12
3.96
0.78
0.14
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
24.92
0.87
9.57
0.33
23.54
0.82
0.36
0.01
210.24
7.32
2612.37 90.99
60.81
2.12
26.34
0.92
9.93
0.35
2871.07 100.00
DRAFT 02/01/05
araad05040
Common map turtle
MiDNR
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
8.29
0.54
Status 3
74.74
4.90
Status 4
0.00
0.00
83.03
5.45
Total
araad08010
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
106.63
0.35
Status 3
1325.02
4.34
Status 4
0.61
0.00
1432.26
4.69
araad09010
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
3.52
0.71
Status 3
41.29
8.29
Status 4
0.00
0.00
44.81
8.99
araae02040
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
5.86
0.55
Status 3
56.88
5.36
Status 4
0.18
0.02
62.92
5.93
araag01030
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
8.00
0.52
Status 3
78.88
5.13
Status 4
0.18
0.01
87.06
5.66
arach01050
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
107.72
0.36
Status 3
3656.23
12.34
Total
1.06
0.07
0.07
0.00
0.00
33.49
2.20
33.49
2.20
13.19
2.26
0.15
1384.82
90.85
1384.82
90.85
0.87
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.26
0.15
2.51
0.16
10.80
0.71
0.00
0.00
92.94
6.10
3.95
0.00
0.26
Total
1418.31 93.05
13.19
0.87
3.95
0.26
2.51
0.16
1524.31 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
5.57
0.41
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.00
197.70
0.65
197.79
0.65
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.02
841.38
5.57
0.02
27977.58
91.64
27977.58
91.64
2.76
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.57
0.02
75.04
0.25
181.67
0.60
0.00
0.00
2166.90
7.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
28175.89 92.29
841.38
2.76
0.00
0.00
75.04
0.25
30530.03 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.97
2.00
9.97
2.00
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.04
3.39
0.21
0.04
439.90
88.28
439.90
88.28
0.68
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.04
0.00
0.00
3.52
0.71
0.00
0.00
44.68
8.97
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
449.87 90.28
3.39
0.68
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
498.28 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
2.26
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
31.34
2.95
31.34
2.95
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.21
3.70
2.26
0.21
957.26
90.19
957.26
90.19
0.35
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.26
0.21
0.00
0.00
5.86
0.55
0.00
0.00
64.53
6.08
3.95
0.00
0.37
Total
988.78 93.16
3.70
0.35
3.95
0.37
0.00
0.00
1061.43 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
2.26
1.70
1.70
0.11
0.11
0.00
0.00
34.94
2.27
34.94
2.27
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.15
15.49
2.26
0.15
1392.16
90.54
1392.16
90.54
1.01
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.26
0.15
0.00
0.00
8.00
0.52
0.00
0.00
100.02
6.51
3.95
0.00
0.26
Total
1427.28 92.83
15.49
1.01
3.95
0.26
0.00
0.00
1537.56 100.00
Five-lined skink
MiDNR
Status 4
1.06
USFS
0.15
Spiny softshell
MiDNR
Total
2.26
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Common musk turtle
MiDNR
Total
Nature
Conservancy
Red-eared slider
MiDNR
Total
MiOther
Eastern box turtle
MiDNR
Total
MiMilitary
2.41
0.01
3766.36
12.71
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
9.01
121.19
0.41
121.19
0.41
0.51
0.00
253.76
0.86
254.27
0.86
9.01
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.03
0.03
23943.96
80.78
23943.96
80.78
128
USFWS
USNPS
0.12
0.00
0.00
9.13
0.03
87.47
0.30
195.19
0.66
0.00
Total
1445.50
4.88
7.84
0.03
4.87
0.02
5236.14 17.67
1445.50
4.88
7.96
0.03
92.34
0.31
29640.59 100.00
24200.13 81.65
DRAFT 02/01/05
aracj02110
Six-lined racerunner
MiDNR
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
0.00
0.00
Status 3
24.71
1.22
Status 4
0.00
0.00
24.71
1.22
Total
aradb06010
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
5.34
0.15
Status 3
155.67
4.33
Status 4
0.00
0.00
161.01
4.48
aradb07010
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
66.02
0.23
Status 3
867.39
3.00
Status 4
0.76
0.00
934.17
3.23
aradb10010
Status 1
160.87
0.62
Status 2
82.78
0.32
Status 3
3386.70
13.14
Total
2.11
0.01
3632.46
14.10
aradb13030
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
68.62
0.41
Status 3
789.56
4.70
Status 4
0.00
0.00
858.18
5.11
aradb13061
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
2.85
0.49
Status 3
97.80
16.94
Total
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.18
0.36
7.18
0.36
0.00
0.00
0.00
1989.10
98.42
1989.10
98.42
0.00
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
24.71
1.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
1996.28 98.78
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2020.99 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
9.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
37.35
1.04
37.35
1.04
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.25
18.27
9.10
0.25
3370.70
93.72
3370.70
93.72
0.51
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.10
0.25
0.00
0.00
5.34
0.15
0.00
0.00
173.94
4.84
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
3408.05 94.76
18.27
0.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3596.43 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
2.84
86.61
86.61
0.30
0.30
0.15
0.00
158.33
0.55
158.48
0.55
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.01
152.51
2.84
0.01
27589.18
95.31
27589.18
95.31
0.53
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.84
0.01
16.65
0.06
82.67
0.29
0.00
0.00
1112.87
3.84
6.21
0.00
0.02
Total
27748.27 95.86
152.51
0.53
6.21
0.02
16.65
0.06
28946.65 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
8.73
42.25
0.16
42.25
0.16
0.55
0.00
232.65
0.90
233.20
0.90
8.73
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.03
0.03
17861.91
69.32
17861.91
69.32
USFWS
USNPS
7.14
0.00
0.00
176.74
0.69
195.93
0.76
278.71
1.08
0.03
Total
3686.50
14.31
1.96
0.01
98.37
0.38
7216.33 28.00
3686.50
14.31
9.10
0.04 294.30
1.14
25768.45 100.00
18096.67 70.23
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
9.44
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
172.22
1.02
172.22
1.02
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.06
432.86
9.44
0.06
15321.27
91.15
15321.27
91.15
2.58
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.44
0.06
0.00
0.00
68.62
0.41
0.00
0.00
1237.05
7.36
14.63
0.00
0.09
Total
15493.49 92.18
432.86
2.58
14.63
0.09
0.00
0.00
16808.60 100.00
Eastern fox snake
MiDNR
Status 4
0.00
USFS
0.00
Black rat snake
MiDNR
Total
0.00
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Northern ring-necked snake
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Blue racer
MiDNR
Total
MiOther
Kirtland's snake
MiDNR
Total
MiMilitary
0.00
0.00
100.65
17.44
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
1.81
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
13.40
2.32
13.40
2.32
1.81
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.31
0.31
452.39
78.37
452.39
78.37
129
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.81
0.31
0.00
0.00
2.85
0.49
0.00
Total
0.00
0.00
9.01
1.56
0.00
0.00
106.81 18.50
0.00
0.00
9.01
1.56
0.00
0.00
577.26 100.00
465.79 80.69
DRAFT 02/01/05
aradb13062
Westen fox snake
MiDNR
Status 1
38.27
0.46
Status 2
10.87
0.13
Status 3
1213.70
14.54
Status 4
Total
0.23
0.00
1263.07
15.13
aradb17020
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
149.03
0.32
Status 3
3299.93
7.18
4.08
0.01
3453.04
7.52
Total
aradb19050
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
309.64
0.43
Status 3 12268.71
17.09
Total
14.04
0.02
12592.39
17.54
aradb22020
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
12.38
0.42
Status 3
87.33
2.96
Status 4
0.00
0.00
99.71
3.38
aradb22060
Status 1
1.40
0.11
Status 2
7.43
0.56
Status 3
238.15
17.94
Total
0.62
0.05
247.60
18.66
aradb27040
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.36
0.00
113.55
1.36
113.91
1.36
2.58
USFWS
0.03
47.49
5285.89
63.31
5285.89
63.31
0.57
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
88.34
1.06
24.32
0.29
35.19
0.42
1589.71
19.04
0.00
0.00
21.81
0.26
2825.58 33.84
1589.71
19.04
47.49
0.57
46.13
0.55
8348.78 100.00
5399.67 64.68
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
6.40
180.60
0.39
180.60
0.39
0.22
0.00
322.15
0.70
322.37
0.70
6.40
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.01
0.01
39909.96
86.86
39909.96
86.86
USFWS
USNPS
0.32
0.00
0.00
6.72
0.01
51.90
0.11
200.93
0.44
0.00
Total
2011.51
4.38
11.57
0.03
0.00
0.00
5503.83 11.98
2011.51
4.38
11.89
0.03
51.90
0.11
45947.67 100.00
40236.19 87.57
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
30.09
290.44
0.40
290.44
0.40
0.29
0.00
699.99
0.98
700.28
0.98
30.09
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.04
0.04
35.06
52806.48
73.56
52806.48
73.56
0.05
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
65.15
0.09
200.74
0.28
510.38
0.71
5103.45
7.11
24.51
0.03
0.00
0.00
17687.40 24.64
5103.45
7.11
59.57
0.08 200.74
0.28
71783.44 100.00
53520.51 74.56
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
1.62
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
25.92
0.88
25.92
0.88
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.05
0.00
1.62
0.05
2819.19
95.68
2819.19
95.68
0.00
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.62
0.05
0.00
0.00
12.38
0.42
0.00
0.00
87.33
2.96
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
2845.11 96.56
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2946.44 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
1.68
1.53
0.12
1.53
0.12
0.07
0.01
22.24
1.68
22.31
1.68
1.68
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.13
0.13
14.56
940.22
70.84
940.22
70.84
1.10
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
17.64
1.33
2.35
0.18
9.78
0.74
93.91
7.08
1.22
0.09
1.79
0.13
336.67 25.37
93.91
7.08
15.78
1.19
4.14
0.31
1327.17 100.00
963.08 72.57
Queen snake
MiDNR
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
1.55
0.51
Status 3
17.86
5.83
Status 4
0.00
0.00
19.41
6.34
Total
0.00
USFS
0.03
Northern water snake
MiDNR
Status 4
2.58
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Copper-bellied water snake
MiDNR
Total
Nature
Conservancy
Eastern milk snake
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Eastern hog-nosed snake
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.41
1.44
4.41
1.44
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.08
5.20
0.24
0.08
276.87
90.38
276.87
90.38
130
1.70
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.08
0.22
0.07
1.77
0.58
0.00
0.00
23.06
7.53
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
281.28 91.82
5.20
1.70
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.07
306.35 100.00
DRAFT 02/01/05
aradb34010
Brown snake
MiDNR
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
297.43
0.34
Status 3 10169.86
11.62
Status 4
Total
13.51
0.02
10480.80
11.97
aradb34030
Status 1
254.99
0.27
Status 2
298.42
0.31
Status 3 11678.54
12.24
Total
11.64
0.01
12243.59
12.84
aradb36020
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
12.30
0.29
Status 3
414.38
9.72
Total
0.58
0.01
427.26
10.02
aradb36120
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
27.71
0.38
Status 3
685.92
9.47
0.68
0.01
714.31
9.87
Total
aradb36130
Status 1
287.44
0.31
Status 2
356.08
0.38
Status 3 14283.01
15.44
Total
13.21
0.01
14939.74
16.15
aradb47010
Status 1
17.93
0.04
Status 2
118.31
0.27
Status 3
3289.27
7.48
2.93
0.01
3428.44
7.79
Total
0.33
287.62
0.33
3.27
0.00
741.81
0.85
745.08
0.85
21.98
0.03
70462.99
80.49
70462.99
80.49
USFWS
USNPS
0.96
0.00
0.00
22.94
0.03
199.62
0.23
497.05
0.57
0.00
Total
5319.81
6.08
25.95
0.03
0.00
0.00
15806.51 18.06
5319.81
6.08
26.91
0.03 199.62
0.23
87544.81 100.00
71218.31 81.35
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
31.23
272.87
0.29
272.87
0.29
1.09
0.00
816.05
0.86
817.14
0.86
31.23
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.03
0.03
237.44
72041.82
75.53
72041.82
75.53
USNPS
Total
0.25 429.44
0.45
953.10
1.00
275.56
0.29
573.98
0.60
8885.34
9.32
18.22
0.02 126.38
0.13
20982.44 22.00
8885.34
9.32 255.66
0.27 831.38
0.87
95379.03 100.00
72869.51 76.40
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
3.14
0.37
0.01
0.37
0.01
0.00
0.00
40.45
0.95
40.45
0.95
3.14
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.07
0.07
3736.04
87.61
3736.04
87.61
USFWS
USNPS
0.19
0.00
0.00
3.33
0.08
0.00
0.00
12.30
0.29
0.00
Total
47.21
1.11
9.83
0.23
0.00
0.00
471.79 11.06
47.21
1.11
10.02
0.23
0.00
0.00
4264.49 100.00
3777.07 88.57
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
5.51
7.08
0.10
7.08
0.10
0.04
0.00
79.10
1.09
79.14
1.09
5.51
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.08
0.08
6309.58
87.14
6309.58
87.14
USFWS
USNPS
0.21
0.00
0.00
5.72
0.08
3.66
0.05
31.37
0.43
0.00
Total
110.70
1.53
10.18
0.14
0.00
0.00
813.92 11.24
110.70
1.53
10.39
0.14
3.66
0.05
7240.37 100.00
6389.36 88.25
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
41.63
282.24
0.31
282.24
0.31
1.71
0.00
939.02
1.01
940.73
1.02
41.63
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.04
0.04
331.38
65165.82
70.42
65165.82
70.42
USNPS
Total
0.36 454.22
0.49
1114.67
1.20
293.79
0.32
649.87
0.70
9915.08
10.72
25.29
0.03 142.44
0.15
24649.77 26.64
9915.08
10.72 356.67
0.39 890.45
0.96
92532.36 100.00
66118.05 71.45
Smooth green snake
MiDNR
Status 4
287.62
USFS
0.03
Eastern garter snake
MiDNR
Status 4
21.98
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Northern ribbon snake
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Butler's garter snake
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Northern red-bellied snake
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
10.43
101.98
0.23
101.98
0.23
0.25
0.00
339.92
0.77
340.17
0.77
10.43
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.02
0.02
195.86
38809.22
88.20
38809.22
88.20
131
0.45
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
224.22
0.51
37.52
0.09
155.83
0.35
1049.87
2.39
15.37
0.03
11.24
0.03
4467.98 10.15
1049.87
2.39 211.23
0.48
48.76
0.11
44000.10 100.00
39152.07 88.98
DRAFT 02/01/05
arade03010
Eastern massasauga rattlesnake
MiDNR
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
56.41
0.40
Status 3
1534.01
10.83
Status 4
Total
1.04
0.01
1591.46
11.23
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
5.05
83.49
0.59
83.49
0.59
0.04
0.00
159.10
1.12
159.14
1.12
5.05
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.04
0.04
12003.92
84.74
12003.92
84.74
132
USFWS
USNPS
0.19
0.00
0.00
5.24
0.04
5.14
0.04
61.55
0.43
0.00
Total
305.20
2.15
12.65
0.09
0.00
0.00
1935.39 13.66
305.20
2.15
12.84
0.09
5.14
0.04
14166.24 100.00
12164.06 85.87
DRAFT 02/01/05
Appendix H. Table of mammal species distribution and stewardship analysis. The area in
square kilometers (multiply by 100 for hectares, 247 for acres) of the species' mapped
distribution by management status and land steward, and the percent of the species' total
distribution in each category.
amaaa01010
Virginia opossum
MiDNR
Status 1
220.34
0.23
Status 2
271.09
0.28
Status 3 10122.52
10.64
Status 4
Total
9.39
0.01
10623.34
11.16
amaba01010
Status 1
306.21
0.36
Status 2
365.43
0.43
Status 3 14824.15
17.51
Total
15.26
0.02
15511.05
18.32
amaba01150
Status 1
20.65
0.51
Status 2
17.97
0.44
Status 3
640.82
15.79
Total
Nature
Conservancy
23.35
239.82
0.25
239.82
0.25
1.24
0.00
833.76
0.88
835.00
0.88
23.35
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.02
0.02
115.92
76520.31
80.41
76520.31
80.41
0.12
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
359.61
0.38
184.91
0.19
456.00
0.48
6466.34
6.80
25.59
0.03 123.60
0.13
16979.11 17.84
6466.34
6.80 141.51
0.15 308.51
0.32
95158.18 100.00
77363.46 81.30
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
54.25
194.79
0.23
194.79
0.23
3.35
0.00
867.99
1.03
871.34
1.03
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.06
10698.53
54.25
0.06
USFWS
346.87
56618.19
66.87
56618.19
66.87 10698.53
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
707.33
0.84
201.20
0.24
566.63
0.67
25.98
0.03 141.92
0.17
25888.72 30.58
12.64 372.85
0.44 343.12
0.41
84664.12 100.00
12.64
0.41
57501.44 67.92
Water shrew
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Masked shrew
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
1.63
0.04
681.07
16.78
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.98
4.21
0.10
4.21
0.10
0.30
0.01
76.34
1.88
76.64
1.89
0.98
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.02
0.02
USFWS
23.34
2730.41
67.27
2730.41
67.27
133
0.58
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
44.97
1.11
9.28
0.23
27.25
0.67
528.12
13.01
0.00
0.00
4.63
0.11
1178.08 29.03
528.12
13.01
23.34
0.58
13.91
0.34
4058.68 100.00
2808.38 69.19
DRAFT 02/01/05
amaba01180
Smoky shrew
MiDNR
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
0.00
0.00
Status 3
4.52
5.00
Status 4
0.02
0.02
Total
4.54
5.02
amaba01190
Status 1
37.24
0.37
Status 2
51.86
0.52
Status 3
2728.37
27.14
Total
1.84
0.02
2819.31
28.05
amaba01250
Status 1
245.65
0.56
Status 2
176.58
0.40
Status 3
9986.94
22.69
Total
9.38
0.02
10418.55
23.67
amaba03010
Status 1
278.57
0.24
Status 2
415.04
0.35
Status 3 15496.90
13.24
Total
15.87
0.01
16206.38
13.84
amaba04010
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
14.64
0.13
Status 3
144.55
1.29
Status 4
0.00
0.00
159.19
1.43
amabb04010
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
212.20
0.32
Status 3
6657.39
9.93
Total
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.13
1.25
1.13
1.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
84.77
93.73
84.77
93.73
0.00
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.52
5.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
85.92 95.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
90.44 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
15.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.03
0.02
93.40
0.93
95.43
0.95
15.12
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.15
0.15
200.20
5188.67
51.62
5188.67
51.62
1.99
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
252.56
2.51
12.69
0.13
64.55
0.64
1705.13
16.96
0.00
0.00
14.97
0.15
4450.50 44.28
1705.13
16.96 200.20
1.99
27.66
0.28
10051.52 100.00
5283.91 52.57
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
25.05
201.75
0.46
201.75
0.46
2.72
0.01
493.57
1.12
496.29
1.13
25.05
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.06
0.06
342.69
25569.35
58.10
25569.35
58.10
0.78
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
613.39
1.39
100.60
0.23
277.18
0.63
6711.72
15.25
0.00
0.00 144.93
0.33
17048.06 38.74
6711.72
15.25 342.69
0.78 245.53
0.56
44010.93 100.00
26072.30 59.24
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
53.58
288.14
0.25
3.20
0.00
288.14
1054.26
0.90
0.25 1057.46
0.90
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
269.90
10777.50
53.58
USFWS
0.05
0.05
88026.59
75.19
88026.59
75.19 10777.50
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
602.05
0.51
217.80
0.19
632.84
0.54
29.20
0.02 145.04
0.12
9.21 299.10
0.26 362.84
0.31 117071.59 100.00
9.21
0.23
26739.98 22.84
89096.72 76.10
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
2.76
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
44.95
0.40
44.95
0.40
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.02
0.00
2.76
0.02
10960.41
98.15
10960.41
98.15
0.00
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.76
0.02
0.00
0.00
14.64
0.13
0.00
0.00
144.55
1.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
11005.36 98.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
11167.31 100.00
Eastern mole
MiDNR
Status 4
0.00
USFS
0.00
Least shrew
MiDNR
Total
0.00
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Northern short-tailed shrew
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Pygmy shrew
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Arctic shrew
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
9.24
0.01
6878.83
10.26
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
9.57
270.28
0.40
270.28
0.40
0.20
0.00
510.75
0.76
510.95
0.76
9.57
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.01
0.01
55817.70
83.29
55817.70
83.29
134
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.57
0.01
144.77
0.22
356.97
0.53
0.00
Total
3366.82
5.02
15.42
0.02
0.00
0.00
10310.11 15.38
3366.82
5.02
15.42
0.02 144.77
0.22
67014.34 100.00
56337.69 84.07
DRAFT 02/01/05
amabb05010
Star-nosed mole
MiDNR
Status 1
2.22
0.01
Status 2
82.39
0.21
Status 3
1981.50
5.12
Status 4
1.90
0.00
2068.01
5.35
Total
amacc01010
Status 1
260.95
0.34
Status 2
304.65
0.40
Status 3 12393.52
16.22
Total
13.19
0.02
12972.31
16.98
amacc01100
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
34.25
0.21
Status 3
445.74
2.77
Status 4
0.00
0.00
479.99
2.98
amacc01150
Status 1
260.92
0.35
Status 2
297.96
0.40
Status 3 12361.20
16.72
Total
13.07
0.02
12933.15
17.50
amacc02010
Status 1
243.31
0.38
Status 2
258.96
0.40
Status 3 10188.28
15.72
Total
11.59
0.02
10702.14
16.51
amacc03020
Status 1
228.75
1.33
Status 2
38.95
0.23
Status 3
2068.25
12.02
Total
97.39
0.25
0.25
0.09
0.00
265.03
0.69
265.12
0.69
601.27
3.88
USFWS
11.06
0.01
35593.65
92.02
35593.65
92.02
1.55
7.14
0.03
0.02
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
17.16
0.04
22.61
0.06
105.00
0.27
9.42
0.02
2696.81
6.97
35860.58 92.71
601.27
1.55
18.20
0.05
32.03
0.08
38679.55 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
42.96
187.28
0.25
187.28
0.25
3.00
0.00
757.50
0.99
760.50
1.00
42.96
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.06
0.06
75.82
51685.06
67.64
51685.06
67.64
USNPS
Total
0.10 489.42
0.64
869.15
1.14
269.43
0.35
574.08
0.75
9777.59
12.80
15.41
0.02 134.15
0.18
22510.95 29.46
9777.59
12.80
91.23
0.12 893.00
1.17
76409.93 100.00
52455.75 68.65
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
10.31
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
74.72
0.46
74.72
0.46
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.06
0.00
10.31
0.06
15521.83
96.49
15521.83
96.49
0.00
USFWS
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.31
0.06
0.00
0.00
34.25
0.21
0.00
0.00
445.74
2.77
0.00
0.00
0.00
15596.55 96.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
16086.85 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
42.82
186.55
0.25
186.55
0.25
3.00
0.00
729.26
0.99
732.26
0.99
42.82
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.06
0.06
USFWS
75.81
49273.43
66.66
49273.43
66.66
USNPS
Total
0.10 489.42
0.66
868.97
1.18
268.56
0.36
566.52
0.77
9765.24
13.21
14.69
0.02 134.10
0.18
22464.78 30.39
9765.24
13.21
90.50
0.12 892.08
1.21
73916.03 100.00
50015.76 67.67
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
33.07
147.51
0.23
147.51
0.23
2.80
0.00
626.97
0.97
629.77
0.97
33.07
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.05
0.05
USFWS
35.75
45128.65
69.63
45128.65
69.63
USNPS
Total
0.06 423.65
0.65
735.78
1.14
247.77
0.38
506.73
0.78
7331.16
11.31
15.56
0.02 116.66
0.18
17801.97 27.47
7331.16
11.31
51.31
0.08 788.08
1.22
64811.69 100.00
45767.21 70.62
Eastern pipistrelle
MiDNR
Status 4
97.39
USFS
0.01
Silver-haired bat
MiDNR
Status 4
3.88
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Northern myotis
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Indiana bat
MiDNR
Total
MiOther
Little brown bat
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
0.00
0.00
2335.95
13.58
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
4.36
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.23
0.00
232.45
1.35
232.68
1.35
4.36
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.03
0.03
11061.11
64.30
11061.11
64.30
135
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
233.11
1.36
0.00
0.00
38.95
0.23
0.00
Total
3568.13
20.74
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5636.61 32.77
3568.13
20.74
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
17202.23 100.00
11293.56 65.65
DRAFT 02/01/05
amacc04010
Big brown bat
MiDNR
Status 1
260.95
0.34
Status 2
304.65
0.40
Status 3 12393.52
16.22
Status 4
Total
13.19
0.02
12972.31
16.98
amacc05010
Status 1
222.77
0.41
Status 2
190.98
0.35
Status 3
7668.09
14.21
Total
8.50
0.02
8090.34
14.99
amacc05030
Status 1
260.92
0.35
Status 2
297.96
0.40
Status 3 12361.20
16.72
Total
13.07
0.02
12933.15
17.50
amaeb01040
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
244.31
0.30
Status 3
9168.46
11.34
Total
9.71
0.01
9422.48
11.66
amaeb03010
Status 1
260.81
0.45
Status 2
233.41
0.40
Status 3 11135.93
19.27
Total
11.19
0.02
11641.34
20.14
amafb02020
Status 1
70.15
0.40
Status 2
65.28
0.38
Status 3
3615.12
20.77
Total
0.25
187.28
0.25
3.00
0.00
757.50
0.99
760.50
1.00
42.96
USFWS
0.06
75.82
51685.06
67.64
51685.06
67.64
USNPS
Total
0.10 489.42
0.64
869.15
1.14
269.43
0.35
574.08
0.75
9777.59
12.80
15.41
0.02 134.15
0.18
22510.95 29.46
9777.59
12.80
91.23
0.12 893.00
1.17
76409.93 100.00
52455.75 68.65
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
18.20
137.40
0.25
137.40
0.25
1.12
0.00
504.48
0.93
505.60
0.94
18.20
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.03
0.03
13.92
38554.41
71.46
38554.41
71.46
USNPS
Total
0.03 350.03
0.65
604.92
1.12
231.04
0.43
422.02
0.78
5932.80
11.00
13.91
0.03 107.88
0.20
13861.20 25.69
5932.80
11.00
27.83
0.05 688.95
1.28
53955.53 100.00
39067.39 72.41
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
42.82
186.55
0.25
186.55
0.25
3.00
0.00
729.26
0.99
732.26
0.99
42.82
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.06
0.06
75.81
49273.43
66.66
49273.43
66.66
USNPS
Total
0.10 489.42
0.66
868.97
1.18
268.56
0.36
566.52
0.77
9765.24
13.21
14.69
0.02 134.10
0.18
22464.78 30.39
9765.24
13.21
90.50
0.12 892.08
1.21
73916.03 100.00
50015.76 67.67
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
15.97
270.28
0.33
270.28
0.33
0.89
0.00
639.31
0.79
640.20
0.79
15.97
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.02
0.02
65081.73
80.53
65081.73
80.53
USFWS
USNPS
0.20
0.00
0.00
16.17
0.02
189.23
0.23
433.54
0.54
0.00
Total
5051.78
6.25
15.42
0.02 129.10
0.16
14635.93 18.11
5051.78
6.25
15.62
0.02 318.33
0.39
80816.39 100.00
65730.75 81.33
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
34.87
130.13
0.23
130.13
0.23
3.18
0.01
607.87
1.05
611.05
1.06
34.87
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.06
0.06
USFWS
83.70
35160.18
60.84
35160.18
60.84
USNPS
Total
0.14 478.50
0.83
857.88
1.48
269.28
0.47
502.69
0.87
9242.88
15.99
0.00
0.00 137.81
0.24
20649.93 35.73
9242.88
15.99
83.70
0.14 885.59
1.53
57789.74 100.00
35779.24 61.91
Least chipmunk
MiDNR
Status 4
187.28
USFS
0.06
Snowshoe hare
MiDNR
Status 4
42.96
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Eastern cottontail
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Hoary bat
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Eastern red bat
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
1.73
0.01
3752.28
21.56
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
24.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.12
0.01
198.25
1.14
200.37
1.15
24.18
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.14
0.14
USFWS
69.56
9623.40
55.29
9623.40
55.29
136
0.40
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
163.89
0.94
31.21
0.18
96.49
0.55
3673.42
21.11
0.00
0.00
30.57
0.18
7321.23 42.06
3673.42
21.11
69.56
0.40
61.78
0.35
17404.99 100.00
9823.38 56.44
DRAFT 02/01/05
amafb02230
Eastern chipmunk
MiDNR
Status 1
180.76
0.34
Status 2
184.83
0.35
Status 3
7691.03
14.57
Status 4
Total
6.00
0.01
8062.62
15.28
amafb03010
Status 1
194.10
0.26
Status 2
207.46
0.28
Status 3
7286.22
9.68
Total
8.67
0.01
7696.45
10.23
amafb05090
Status 1
4.70
0.01
Status 2
104.49
0.25
Status 3
2719.72
6.41
Status 4
2.95
0.01
2831.86
6.68
amafb07010
Status 1
162.15
0.43
Status 2
130.55
0.34
Status 3
4543.76
11.94
Total
4.22
0.01
4840.68
12.72
amafb07040
Status 1
1.22
0.00
Status 2
74.08
0.30
Status 3
1357.10
5.43
Status 4
0.81
0.00
1433.21
5.74
amafb08010
Status 1
201.62
0.32
Status 2
262.93
0.42
Status 3 10309.26
16.28
Total
0.31
161.73
0.31
0.84
0.00
501.39
0.95
502.23
0.95
21.25
USFWS
0.04
52.97
36359.10
68.90
36359.10
68.90
USNPS
Total
0.10 196.06
0.37
451.04
0.85
226.92
0.43
411.75
0.78
7057.01
13.37
8.29
0.02 122.01
0.23
15040.91 28.50
7057.01
13.37
61.26
0.12 544.99
1.03
52770.19 100.00
36866.49 69.86
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
12.81
201.79
0.27
201.79
0.27
0.62
0.00
558.41
0.74
559.03
0.74
12.81
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.02
0.02
22.01
61640.12
81.89
61640.12
81.89
0.03
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
228.92
0.30
196.88
0.26
404.34
0.54
4816.58
6.40
14.02
0.02 108.98
0.14
12428.21 16.51
4816.58
6.40
36.03
0.05 305.86
0.41
75268.67 100.00
62207.20 82.65
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
3.70
154.47
154.47
0.36
0.36
0.11
0.00
291.75
0.69
291.86
0.69
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.01
1149.45
3.70
0.01
37926.45
89.44
37926.45
89.44
2.71
USFWS
USNPS
0.01
0.00
0.00
8.41
0.02
31.65
0.07
136.14
0.32
9.96
0.02
4040.72
9.53
7.01
0.00
0.02
Total
38221.15 90.13
1149.45
2.71
7.02
0.02
41.61
0.10
42406.42 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
9.72
102.17
0.27
102.17
0.27
0.59
0.00
336.87
0.88
337.46
0.89
9.72
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.03
0.03
28097.71
73.81
28097.71
73.81
USFWS
USNPS
6.51
0.00
0.00
178.38
0.47
198.00
0.52
328.55
0.86
96.28
0.25
9119.92 23.96
0.04 294.28
0.77
38065.65 100.00
4369.68
11.48
7.44
4369.68
11.48
13.95
0.02
0.02
Total
28438.80 74.71
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
6.38
80.43
80.43
0.32
0.32
0.17
0.00
224.11
0.90
224.28
0.90
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.03
364.50
6.38
0.03
22841.84
91.45
22841.84
91.45
1.46
USFWS
USNPS
1.76
0.00
0.00
9.36
0.04
15.75
0.06
89.83
0.36
0.00
0.00
1811.30
7.25
9.10
0.01
0.04
Total
23066.76 92.35
364.50
1.46
10.86
0.04
15.75
0.06
24977.25 100.00
Red squirrel
MiDNR
Status 4
161.73
USFS
0.04
Eastern fox squirrel
MiDNR
Total
21.25
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Eastern gray squirrel
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Thirteen-lined ground squirrel
MiDNR
Total
MiOther
Woodchuck
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
9.43
0.01
10783.24
17.03
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
40.44
154.98
0.24
154.98
0.24
2.80
0.00
625.41
0.99
628.21
0.99
40.44
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.06
0.06
USFWS
69.17
42485.97
67.09
42485.97
67.09
137
USNPS
Total
0.11 269.00
0.42
580.23
0.92
211.94
0.33
474.87
0.75
8543.39
13.49
13.70
0.02 128.05
0.20
19152.18 30.24
8543.39
13.49
82.87
0.13 608.99
0.96
63328.09 100.00
43120.81 68.09
DRAFT 02/01/05
amafb09010
Southern flying squirrel
MiDNR
Status 1
32.60
0.13
Status 2
100.65
0.40
Status 3
3462.70
13.76
Status 4
Total
3.73
0.01
3599.68
14.30
amafb09020
Status 1
28.56
0.09
Status 2
142.56
0.46
Status 3
7424.84
24.08
Total
6.91
0.02
7602.87
24.66
amafe01010
Status 1
11.80
0.28
Status 2
16.44
0.39
Status 3
480.88
11.43
Total
0.87
0.02
509.99
12.12
amaff03040b
Status 1
1.19
0.01
Status 2
39.59
0.35
Status 3
1060.49
9.42
0.66
0.01
1101.93
9.78
Total
amaff03040g
Status 1
205.73
0.74
Status 2
86.11
0.31
Status 3
5311.95
19.15
Total
8.50
0.03
5612.29
20.24
amaff03070
Status 1
227.87
0.37
Status 2
204.99
0.33
Status 3
9493.52
15.23
Total
0.36
91.42
0.36
0.53
0.00
260.42
1.03
260.95
1.04
9.20
0.04
18741.02
74.47
18741.02
74.47
USFWS
USNPS
0.11
0.00
0.00
41.91
0.17
31.49
0.13
132.14
0.53
0.00
Total
2409.36
9.57
11.60
0.05
9.96
0.04
5985.57 23.79
2409.36
9.57
11.71
0.05
41.45
0.16
25164.79 100.00
19005.17 75.52
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
26.96
93.20
0.30
93.20
0.30
2.35
0.01
278.05
0.90
280.40
0.91
26.96
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.09
0.09
68.65
17978.96
58.32
17978.96
58.32
0.22
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
124.17
0.40
201.88
0.65
344.44
1.12
4454.63
14.45
0.00
0.00 122.70
0.40
12097.72 39.24
4454.63
14.45
68.65
0.22 324.58
1.05
30830.25 100.00
18263.92 59.24
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
2.54
2.17
0.05
2.17
0.05
0.17
0.00
65.50
1.56
65.67
1.56
2.54
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.06
0.06
12.05
3352.84
79.66
3352.84
79.66
0.29
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
26.39
0.63
4.16
0.10
20.60
0.49
254.63
6.05
2.58
0.06
2.19
0.05
742.62 17.64
254.63
6.05
14.63
0.35
6.35
0.15
4208.82 100.00
3419.21 81.24
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
1.98
76.86
0.68
76.86
0.68
0.03
0.00
114.26
1.01
114.29
1.01
1.98
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.02
0.02
9566.95
84.94
9566.95
84.94
USFWS
USNPS
5.39
1.40
0.01
9.96
0.09
23.08
0.20
62.67
0.56
0.05
Total
368.79
3.27
1.98
0.02
1.14
0.01
1509.29 13.40
368.79
3.27
7.37
0.07
25.62
0.23
11263.79 100.00
9681.87 85.96
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
18.15
1.52
0.01
1.52
0.01
1.94
0.01
251.59
0.91
253.53
0.91
18.15
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.07
0.07
USFWS
27.23
17631.04
63.57
17631.04
63.57
USNPS
Total
0.10 293.19
1.06
544.30
1.96
149.45
0.54
235.56
0.85
3634.49
13.10
0.00
0.00 114.41
0.41
9064.31 32.68
3634.49
13.10
27.23
0.10 557.05
2.01
27735.30 100.00
17891.13 64.51
White-footed mouse
MiDNR
Status 4
91.42
USFS
0.04
Deer mouse (gracilis)
MiDNR
Status 4
9.20
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Deer mouse (bairdii)
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
American beaver
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Northern flying squirrel
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
9.44
0.02
9935.82
15.94
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
17.32
196.47
0.32
196.47
0.32
1.20
0.00
607.87
0.98
609.07
0.98
17.32
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.03
0.03
USFWS
55.03
43402.09
69.62
43402.09
69.62
138
0.09
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
300.22
0.48
221.03
0.35
426.02
0.68
7757.16
12.44
14.77
0.02 133.19
0.21
17596.31 28.23
7757.16
12.44
69.80
0.11 354.22
0.57
62341.95 100.00
44019.40 70.61
DRAFT 02/01/05
amaff09020
Southern red-backed vole
MiDNR
Status 1
294.39
0.43
Status 2
260.59
0.38
Status 3 13952.05
20.46
Status 4
Total
15.27
0.02
14522.30
21.29
amaff11010
Status 1
3.43
0.01
Status 2
85.93
0.22
Status 3
2327.98
6.07
Status 4
2.06
0.01
2419.40
6.30
amaff11140
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
4.50
0.17
Status 3
14.35
0.54
Status 4
0.00
0.00
18.85
0.71
amaff11150
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
112.95
0.43
Status 3
3603.60
13.69
Total
4.58
0.02
3721.13
14.14
amaff15010
Status 1
14.73
0.35
Status 2
30.25
0.71
Status 3
1081.09
25.46
Total
0.84
0.02
1126.91
26.54
amaff17010
Status 1
215.84
0.28
Status 2
318.61
0.41
Status 3 12505.04
16.05
Total
0.42
286.95
0.42
3.09
0.00
712.66
1.04
715.75
1.05
10219.81
37.66
USFWS
198.22
0.06
41274.64
60.52
41274.64
60.52 10219.81
USNPS
Total
0.29 505.26
0.74
1035.53
1.52
297.45
0.44
558.04
0.82
0.00
0.00 146.48
0.21
24608.38 36.08
14.98 198.22
0.29 949.19
1.39
68204.52 100.00
14.98
42002.57 61.58
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
7.42
98.25
98.25
0.26
0.26
0.14
0.00
270.86
0.71
271.00
0.71
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
32.84
687.54
7.42
USFWS
0.02
0.02
34807.98
90.70
34807.98
90.70
1.79
12.56
0.09
0.03
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
43.69
0.11
31.94
0.08
117.87
0.31
10.04
0.03
3136.51
8.17
35080.90 91.41
687.54
1.79
45.40
0.12
41.98
0.11
38378.97 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
1.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
16.61
0.62
16.61
0.62
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.05
0.00
1.41
0.05
2624.91
98.61
2624.91
98.61
0.00
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.41
0.05
0.00
0.00
4.50
0.17
0.00
0.00
14.35
0.54
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
2641.52 99.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2661.78 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
9.05
105.32
0.40
105.32
0.40
0.15
0.00
240.34
0.91
240.49
0.91
9.05
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.03
0.03
20480.99
77.83
20480.99
77.83
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.05
0.03
105.95
0.40
218.90
0.83
0.00
Total
1638.05
6.23
12.91
0.05
0.00
0.00
5360.03 20.37
1638.05
6.23
12.91
0.05 105.95
0.40
26313.89 100.00
20725.91 78.76
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
5.61
3.68
0.09
3.68
0.09
0.11
0.00
52.66
1.24
52.77
1.24
5.61
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.13
0.13
173.30
2483.46
58.49
2483.46
58.49
4.08
USNPS
Total
13.86
0.33
207.50
4.89
3.53
0.08
33.78
0.80
377.27
8.89
3.96
0.09
1.36
0.03
1467.47 34.56
377.27
8.89 177.26
4.18
18.75
0.44
4245.71 100.00
2536.96 59.75
Southern bog lemming
MiDNR
Status 4
286.95
USFS
0.06
Muskrat
MiDNR
Status 4
37.66
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Woodland vole
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Prairie vole
MiDNR
Total
MiOther
Meadow vole
MiDNR
Total
MiMilitary
9.07
0.01
13048.56
16.75
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
49.94
198.51
0.25
198.51
0.25
3.05
0.00
790.09
1.01
793.14
1.02
49.94
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.06
0.06
USFWS
266.05
54330.75
69.73
54330.75
69.73
139
0.34
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
531.83
0.68
242.94
0.31
561.55
0.72
8823.71
11.32
22.88
0.03 137.47
0.18
21690.66 27.84
8823.71
11.32 288.93
0.37 380.41
0.49
77913.95 100.00
55129.91 70.76
DRAFT 02/01/05
amafh01010
Meadow jumping mouse
MiMilitary
MiDNR
Status 1
32.52
0.15
Status 2
86.31
0.40
Status 3
3209.08
14.79
Status 4
Total
2.30
0.01
3330.21
15.35
amafh02010
101.04
0.47
101.04
0.47
187.07
0.51
Status 2
142.09
0.39
Status 3
6641.33
18.15
5.93
0.02
6976.42
19.07
amafj01010
MiMilitary
196.42
0.42
Status 2
190.47
0.41
Status 3
8789.16
18.72
7.28
0.02
9183.33
19.56
amaja01010
Status 1
273.41
0.23
Status 2
423.88
0.36
Status 3 16198.81
13.68
Total
16.66
0.01
16912.76
14.28
amaja01030
Status 1
267.61
0.72
Status 2
123.97
0.33
Status 3
6376.93
17.17
Total
3.64
0.01
6772.15
18.23
amaja03010
Status 1
156.55
0.15
Status 2
269.84
0.25
Status 3 10519.19
9.83
Total
7.42
0.03
16732.02
77.10
16732.02
77.10
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
142.84
0.66
36.24
0.17
122.55
0.56
1131.52
5.21
6.12
0.03
15.65
0.07
4463.66 20.57
1131.52
5.21 109.02
0.50
51.89
0.24
21700.63 100.00
16971.58 78.21
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
58.14
0.16
58.14
0.16
2.79
0.01
380.82
1.04
383.61
1.05
23.81
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.07
0.07
29.13
23207.08
63.42
23207.08
63.42
0.08
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
240.01
0.66
190.29
0.52
332.38
0.91
5611.37
15.34
0.00
0.00 111.93
0.31
12425.56 33.96
5611.37
15.34
29.13
0.08 302.22
0.83
36591.78 100.00
23593.83 64.48
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
30.32
97.70
0.21
97.70
0.21
2.89
0.01
502.62
1.07
505.51
1.08
30.32
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.06
0.06
68.92
28653.43
61.03
28653.43
61.03
USNPS
Total
0.15 258.82
0.55
554.48
1.18
239.18
0.51
429.65
0.92
7787.60
16.59
0.00
0.00 124.21
0.26
16801.56 35.79
7787.60
16.59
68.92
0.15 622.21
1.33
46949.02 100.00
29163.33 62.12
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
54.58
289.54
0.24
3.39
0.00
289.54
1087.72
0.92
0.24 1091.11
0.92
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
214.42
10977.37
54.58
USFWS
0.05
0.05
88419.75
74.68
88419.75
74.68 10977.37
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
542.41
0.46
275.99
0.23
699.87
0.59
30.10
0.03 134.85
0.11
9.27 244.52
0.21 410.84
0.35 118400.47 100.00
9.27
0.18
27634.06 23.34
89524.13 75.61
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
31.36
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.83
0.01
373.64
1.01
376.47
1.01
31.36
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.08
0.08
103.28
22344.20
60.15
22344.20
60.15
USNPS
Total
0.28 497.63
1.34
899.88
2.42
104.74
0.28
228.71
0.62
6773.29
18.23
0.00
0.00 143.95
0.39
13297.00 35.80
6773.29
18.23 103.28
0.28 746.32
2.01
37147.07 100.00
22721.48 61.17
Red fox
MiDNR
Status 4
1.09
0.47
Gray wolf
MiDNR
Status 4
1.09
237.51
USFWS
102.90
Coyote
MiDNR
Status 4
237.26
USFS
0.03
Common porcupine
Status 1
Total
0.00
23.81
MiDNR
Status 4
0.25
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Woodland jumping mouse
Status 1
Total
Nature
Conservancy
7.42
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
11.28
0.01
10956.86
10.24
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
19.94
269.58
0.25
269.58
0.25
1.10
0.00
809.58
0.76
810.68
0.76
19.94
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.02
0.02
56.73
86004.28
80.41
86004.28
80.41
140
USNPS
Total
0.05 412.01
0.39
645.23
0.60
219.78
0.21
489.62
0.46
87.84
0.08
8101.00
7.57
18.51
0.02
8101.00
7.57
75.24
0.07 719.63
18997.22 17.76
86825.14 81.18
0.67 106957.21 100.00
DRAFT 02/01/05
amaja04010
Common gray fox
MiDNR
Status 1
165.65
0.27
Status 2
211.57
0.35
Status 3
7767.70
12.89
Status 4
Total
5.81
0.01
8150.73
13.53
amajb01010
Status 1
271.55
0.32
Status 2
331.66
0.39
Status 3 14340.66
16.99
Total
16.47
0.02
14960.34
17.72
amaje02010
Status 1
287.56
0.25
Status 2
383.28
0.34
Status 3 14418.40
12.70
Total
14.08
0.01
15103.32
13.30
amajf01010
Status 1
41.93
0.20
Status 2
110.44
0.54
Status 3
5269.71
25.61
Total
5.16
0.03
5427.24
26.38
amajf01020
Status 1
216.55
0.80
Status 2
93.81
0.35
Status 3
4664.19
17.26
Total
2.74
0.01
4977.29
18.42
amajf02010
Status 1
296.27
0.35
Status 2
351.40
0.41
Status 3 14904.40
17.50
Total
0.34
203.39
0.34
1.01
0.00
578.32
0.96
579.33
0.96
19.57
USFWS
0.03
19.80
45518.12
75.56
45518.12
75.56
0.03
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
205.02
0.34
238.45
0.40
450.02
0.75
5382.08
8.93
16.56
0.03 111.29
0.18
13482.03 22.38
5382.08
8.93
36.36
0.06 349.74
0.58
60239.32 100.00
46102.25 76.53
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
37.07
286.48
0.34
286.48
0.34
3.39
0.00
867.34
1.03
870.73
1.03
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
125.29
10817.19
37.07
USFWS
0.04
0.04
56872.12
67.36
56872.12
67.36 10817.19
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
433.91
0.51
307.05
0.36
638.71
0.76
0.00
0.00 150.18
0.18
25597.90 30.32
12.81 125.29
0.15 457.23
0.54
84426.45 100.00
12.81
0.15
57755.93 68.41
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
42.78
282.67
0.25
1.74
0.00
282.67
1029.76
0.91
0.25 1031.50
0.91
42.78
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.04
0.04
331.95
86354.00
76.04
86354.00
76.04
0.29
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
662.29
0.58
295.62
0.26
678.90
0.60
9953.78
8.76
29.65
0.03 142.46
0.13
24828.70 21.86
9953.78
8.76 361.60
0.32 438.08
0.39 113567.73 100.00
87397.84 76.96
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
26.05
54.15
0.26
54.15
0.26
2.19
0.01
233.11
1.13
235.30
1.14
26.05
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.13
0.13
USFWS
70.32
10675.30
51.89
10675.30
51.89
0.34
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
138.30
0.67
40.95
0.20
151.39
0.74
4013.96
19.51
0.00
0.00
31.47
0.15
9371.48 45.55
4013.96
19.51
70.32
0.34
72.42
0.35
20574.74 100.00
10913.57 53.04
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
23.81
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.51
0.01
265.41
0.98
267.92
0.99
23.81
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.09
0.09
USFWS
138.81
16341.10
60.47
16341.10
60.47
0.51
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
379.17
1.40
82.79
0.31
176.60
0.65
5073.26
18.77
0.00
0.00 120.00
0.44
9859.96 36.48
5073.26
18.77 138.81
0.51 202.79
0.75
27024.98 100.00
16609.25 61.46
Ermine
MiDNR
Status 4
203.39
USFS
0.03
Fisher
MiDNR
Status 4
19.57
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
American marten
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Common raccoon
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Black bear
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
15.15
0.02
15567.22
18.28
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
48.01
211.39
0.25
211.39
0.25
3.35
0.00
872.06
1.02
875.41
1.03
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.06
10702.08
48.01
0.06
USFWS
194.29
56610.43
66.46
56610.43
66.46 10702.08
141
USNPS
Total
0.23 515.22
0.60
1053.79
1.24
283.86
0.33
635.26
0.75
19.31
0.02 149.91
0.18
25990.44 30.51
12.56 213.60
0.25 948.99
1.11
85177.13 100.00
12.56
57497.64 67.50
DRAFT 02/01/05
amajf02020
Least weasel
MiDNR
Status 1
1.68
0.01
Status 2
63.89
0.21
Status 3
967.23
3.22
Status 4
0.06
0.00
1032.86
3.43
Total
amajf02030
Status 1
297.80
0.30
Status 2
414.74
0.42
Status 3 15988.44
16.35
Total
15.79
0.02
16716.77
17.10
amajf02050
Status 1
22.87
0.29
Status 2
46.33
0.59
Status 3
1558.31
19.72
Total
1.70
0.02
1629.21
20.61
amajf04010
Status 1
1.19
0.00
Status 2
65.96
0.20
Status 3
1160.71
3.59
Status 4
1.53
0.00
1229.39
3.80
amajf06010
Status 1
241.25
0.22
Status 2
293.30
0.26
Status 3 10863.31
9.81
Total
11.39
0.01
11409.25
10.31
amajf08010
Status 1
20.51
0.27
Status 2
47.75
0.63
Status 3
1305.71
17.12
Total
12.97
0.04
0.04
0.17
0.00
184.33
0.61
184.50
0.61
291.41
3.34
0.01
28521.92
94.83
28521.92
94.83
0.97
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.02
0.02
22.15
0.07
86.04
0.29
0.00
0.00
1279.41
4.25
7.63
0.00
0.03
Total
28706.31 95.44
291.41
0.97
7.63
0.03
22.15
0.07
30076.78 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
52.76
291.51
0.30
291.51
0.30
3.36
0.00
994.86
1.02
998.22
1.02
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
199.44
11079.74
52.76
USFWS
0.05
0.05
67401.99
68.95
67401.99
68.95 11079.74
USNPS
Total
0.20 516.17
0.53
1066.17
1.09
330.89
0.34
745.63
0.76
21.31
0.02 150.65
0.15
27535.01 28.17
11.33 220.75
0.23 997.71
1.02
97759.45 100.00
11.33
68412.64 69.98
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
6.56
5.18
0.07
5.18
0.07
0.27
0.00
106.60
1.35
106.87
1.35
6.56
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.08
0.08
171.32
5359.53
67.81
5359.53
67.81
2.17
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
200.75
2.54
6.94
0.09
53.27
0.67
605.65
7.66
6.93
0.09
5.59
0.07
2181.93 27.61
605.65
7.66 178.25
2.26
12.53
0.16
7903.78 100.00
5467.83 69.18
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
3.09
77.15
77.15
0.24
0.24
0.06
0.00
198.67
0.61
198.73
0.61
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.01
380.59
3.09
0.01
30391.91
94.04
30391.91
94.04
1.18
USFWS
USNPS
Total
5.82
0.00
0.00
10.10
0.03
22.86
0.07
88.82
0.27
1.14
0.00
1625.89
5.03
6.24
0.02
0.02
30592.11 94.66
380.59
1.18
12.06
0.04
24.00
0.07
32316.92 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
27.82
270.65
0.24
270.65
0.24
1.10
0.00
839.42
0.76
840.52
0.76
27.82
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.03
0.03
64.14
89079.73
80.48
89079.73
80.48
0.06
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
333.21
0.30
190.04
0.17
483.34
0.44
8661.22
7.82
19.22
0.02 129.18
0.12
19944.68 18.02
8661.22
7.82
83.36
0.08 319.22
0.29 110691.77 100.00
89930.54 81.24
Northern river otter
MiDNR
Status 4
12.97
USFS
0.01
Striped skunk
MiDNR
Status 4
3.34
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
American badger
MiDNR
Total
Nature
Conservancy
Mink
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Long-tailed weasel
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
1.04
0.01
1375.01
18.03
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
8.97
5.27
0.07
5.27
0.07
0.13
0.00
118.41
1.55
118.54
1.55
8.97
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.12
0.12
197.14
5417.00
71.03
5417.00
71.03
142
2.59
USNPS
Total
13.95
0.18
240.57
3.15
14.68
0.19
62.43
0.82
464.69
6.09
8.34
0.11
2.28
0.03
1786.42 23.43
464.69
6.09 205.48
2.69
30.91
0.41
7625.87 100.00
5536.45 72.60
DRAFT 02/01/05
amajh03020
Bobcat
MiMilitary
MiDNR
Status 1
293.11
0.40
Status 2
310.67
0.42
Status 3 13609.80
18.58
Status 4
Total
14.55
0.02
14228.13
19.42
amalc01010
209.09
0.29
209.09
0.29
0.00
0.00
Status 2
2.05
0.03
Status 3
2169.26
35.00
10.06
0.16
2181.37
35.20
amalc02020
MiMilitary
270.65
0.26
Status 2
366.73
0.35
Status 3 14382.98
13.79
15.45
0.01
15035.81
14.42
amalc03010
Status 1
43.71
0.33
Status 2
91.80
0.70
Status 3
2824.46
21.42
Total
1.03
754.15
1.03
10343.98
37.50
USFWS
178.09
0.05
47123.08
64.31
47123.08
64.31 10343.98
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
508.70
0.69
237.84
0.32
548.51
0.75
12.18
0.02 145.38
0.20
24323.44 33.20
14.12 190.27
0.26 383.22
0.52
73269.42 100.00
14.12
0.24
47888.77 65.36
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
2.40
0.04
2.40
0.04
0.00
0.00
63.00
1.02
63.00
1.02
0.00
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.00
0.00
3943.87
63.64
3943.87
63.64
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.05
0.03
0.00
Total
6.37
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2178.03 35.15
6.37
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6197.01 100.00
4016.93 64.82
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
49.83
209.68
0.20
209.68
0.20
3.29
0.00
931.05
0.89
934.34
0.90
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.05
10471.87
49.83
0.05
USFWS
123.42
76997.67
73.84
76997.67
73.84 10471.87
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
443.90
0.43
285.49
0.27
652.22
0.63
23.13
0.02 148.79
0.14
10.04 146.55
0.14 434.28
0.42 104280.03 100.00
10.04
0.12
25239.74 24.20
77944.17 74.75
Moose
MiDNR
Status 4
751.14
USFS
0.05
White-tailed deer
Status 1
Total
0.00
0.00
MiDNR
Status 4
3.01
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Elk
Status 1
Total
Nature
Conservancy
37.50
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
0.22
0.00
2960.19
22.45
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
11.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
71.52
0.54
71.52
0.54
11.11
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.08
0.08
USFWS
197.58
7385.37
56.01
7385.37
56.01
143
USNPS
Total
1.50 470.50
3.57
722.90
5.48
86.81
0.66
178.61
1.35
1883.09
14.28
0.00
0.00 120.74
0.92
4828.29 36.61
1883.09
14.28 197.58
1.50 678.05
5.14
13186.91 100.00
7457.11 56.55
DRAFT 02/01/05
Appendix I. Table of bird species distribution and stewardship analysis. The area in
square kilometers (multiply by 100 for hectares, 247 for acres) of the species' mapped
distribution by management status and land steward, and the percent of the species' total
distribution in each category.
abnba01030
Common loon
MiDNR
Status 1
4.26
0.19
Status 2
8.24
0.37
Status 3
112.33
5.04
Status 4
0.19
0.01
125.02
5.61
Total
abnca02010
Status 1
8.25
0.22
Status 2
23.32
0.62
Status 3
290.89
7.75
0.35
0.01
322.81
8.60
Total
abnca03020
Status 1
6.54
2.26
Status 2
5.49
1.89
Status 3
66.26
22.86
Total
Nature
Conservancy
0.38
1.50
1.50
0.07
0.07
0.00
0.00
32.90
1.48
32.90
1.48
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
21.95
63.77
0.38
USFWS
0.02
0.02
1957.71
87.82
1957.71
87.82
2.86
0.00
0.98
0.00
USNPS
Total
14.94
0.67
41.53
1.86
10.76
0.48
19.00
0.85
0.36
0.02
177.96
7.98
1990.80 89.30
63.77
2.86
21.95
0.98
26.06
1.17
2229.29 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
3.99
2.27
0.06
2.27
0.06
0.02
0.00
78.69
2.10
78.71
2.10
3.99
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.11
0.11
46.89
3165.88
84.32
3165.88
84.32
1.25
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
59.13
1.57
12.06
0.32
35.38
0.94
115.14
3.07
5.48
0.15
1.19
0.03
414.99 11.05
115.14
3.07
52.37
1.39
13.25
0.35
3754.42 100.00
3244.92 86.43
Red-necked grebe
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Pied-billed grebe
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
0.00
0.00
78.29
27.01
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.85
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.50
1.21
3.50
1.21
0.85
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.29
0.29
180.94
62.43
180.94
62.43
144
USFWS
USNPS
Total
3.22
0.00
0.00
10.61
3.66
0.00
0.00
5.49
1.89
1.11
23.03
7.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
89.29 30.81
23.03
7.95
3.22
1.11
0.00
0.00
289.83 100.00
184.44 63.64
DRAFT 02/01/05
abnfd01020
Double-crested cormorant
MiDNR
Status 1
35.24
0.23
Status 2
90.64
0.58
Status 3
3224.71
20.78
Status 4
Total
2.57
0.02
3353.16
21.61
abnga01020
Status 1
45.03
0.44
Status 2
62.39
0.61
Status 3
2258.54
21.93
Total
2.26
0.02
2368.22
22.99
abnga02010
0.00
6.87
0.42
Status 3
414.43
25.27
Total
0.13
0.01
421.43
25.70
abnga04010
Status 1
45.98
0.19
Status 2
117.02
0.49
Status 3
4569.42
19.33
Total
3.77
0.02
4736.19
20.03
abnga04040
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
20.26
0.38
Status 3
492.10
9.21
Status 4
0.00
0.00
512.36
9.59
abnga07010
0.00
0.00
1.18
0.01
201.13
1.30
202.31
1.30
22.30
USFWS
0.14
11.83
9977.94
64.30
9977.94
64.30
USNPS
Total
0.08 130.00
0.84
199.37
1.28
44.23
0.29
134.87
0.87
1737.65
11.20
15.84
0.10
21.41
0.14
5000.79 32.23
1737.65
11.20
27.67
0.18 195.64
1.26
15516.67 100.00
10181.64 65.62
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
9.83
9.06
0.09
9.06
0.09
0.28
0.00
134.45
1.31
134.73
1.31
9.83
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.10
0.10
271.77
6527.93
63.37
6527.93
63.37
2.64
USNPS
Total
26.18
0.25
352.81
3.42
8.89
0.09
71.28
0.69
924.77
8.98
11.73
0.11
8.01
0.08
3212.39 31.18
924.77
8.98 283.50
2.75
43.08
0.42
10301.12 100.00
6664.64 64.70
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.86
0.21
0.01
0.21
0.01
0.06
0.00
23.73
1.45
23.79
1.45
0.86
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.05
0.05
937.78
57.18
937.78
57.18
172.04
10.49
USNPS
0.00
0.00
Total
172.90 10.54
1.60
0.10
78.26
4.77
4.14
0.25
0.00
0.00
497.10 30.31
8.47
0.52
78.26
4.77 176.18
10.74
1.60
0.10
1640.11 100.00
961.64 58.63
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
27.57
9.54
0.04
9.54
0.04
2.41
0.01
285.66
1.21
288.07
1.22
27.57
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.12
0.12
243.97
15838.22
66.99
15838.22
66.99
2309.71
9.77
14.45
2309.71
9.77 258.42
USNPS
Total
1.03 127.43
0.54
444.95
1.88
30.66
0.13
147.68
0.62
18.50
0.08
6924.03 29.28
1.09 176.59
0.75
23644.31 100.00
0.06
16127.65 68.21
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
6.82
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
72.48
1.36
72.48
1.36
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.13
17.95
6.82
0.13
4719.34
88.35
4719.34
88.35
0.34
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.82
0.13
0.00
0.00
20.26
0.38
0.00
0.00
522.68
9.79
12.63
0.00
0.24
Total
4791.82 89.71
17.95
0.34
12.63
0.24
0.00
0.00
5341.58 100.00
Cattle egret
MiDNR
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
2.11
0.06
Status 3
174.39
5.29
Status 4
0.00
0.00
176.50
5.35
Total
0.00
USFS
0.14
Great egret
MiDNR
Total
0.00
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Great blue heron
MiDNR
Status 4
22.30
0.00
Status 2
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Least bittern
MiDNR
Status 1
MiOther
American bittern
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.63
0.32
10.63
0.32
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3112.51
94.33
3112.51
94.33
145
0.00
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.11
0.06
0.00
0.00
174.39
5.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
3123.14 94.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3299.64 100.00
DRAFT 02/01/05
abnga08010
Green heron
MiDNR
Status 1
46.83
0.23
Status 2
104.33
0.52
Status 3
3757.22
18.70
Status 4
Total
2.98
0.01
3911.36
19.47
abnga11010
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
1.09
0.50
Status 3
32.95
15.02
Total
0.00
0.00
34.04
15.52
abnjb02030
Status 1
1.82
0.09
Status 2
11.36
0.58
Status 3
135.68
6.98
0.40
0.02
149.26
7.68
Total
abnjb05030
Status 1
2.58
0.19
Status 2
9.06
0.65
Status 3
127.26
9.18
Total
0.23
0.02
139.13
10.04
abnjb09010
Status 1
268.25
0.41
Status 2
259.54
0.40
Status 3 10131.80
15.60
Total
10.70
0.02
10670.29
16.42
abnjb10010
Status 1
3.05
0.33
Status 2
5.14
0.56
Status 3
129.67
14.06
Total
0.06
12.96
0.06
0.66
0.00
248.83
1.24
249.49
1.24
17.46
USFWS
0.09
274.33
14251.92
70.93
14251.92
70.93
1.37
USNPS
Total
36.47
0.18
375.09
1.87
19.47
0.10
123.80
0.62
1293.29
6.44
15.51
0.08
11.93
0.06
5091.57 25.34
1293.29
6.44 289.84
1.44
67.87
0.34
20094.19 100.00
14503.73 72.18
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.87
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.01
8.91
4.06
8.93
4.07
0.87
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.40
0.40
165.01
75.22
165.01
75.22
USFWS
USNPS
1.14
0.00
0.00
2.01
0.92
0.00
0.00
1.09
0.50
0.52
Total
7.35
3.35
2.02
0.92
0.00
0.00
42.34 19.30
7.35
3.35
3.16
1.44
0.00
0.00
219.36 100.00
173.92 79.29
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
37.64
1.94
37.64
1.94
0.15
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.01
0.01
80.15
1560.91
80.33
1560.91
80.33
4.12
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
82.12
4.23
6.97
0.36
18.33
0.94
107.55
5.53
0.00
0.00
0.49
0.03
243.72 12.54
107.55
5.53
80.15
4.12
7.46
0.38
1943.12 100.00
1598.95 82.29
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
1.90
1.30
0.09
1.30
0.09
0.02
0.00
35.01
2.53
35.03
2.53
1.90
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.14
0.14
18.82
1133.04
81.73
1133.04
81.73
1.36
USNPS
Total
3.19
0.23
26.49
1.91
3.90
0.28
12.96
0.93
48.44
3.49
0.80
0.06
0.84
0.06
178.66 12.89
48.44
3.49
19.62
1.42
7.93
0.57
1386.39 100.00
1168.28 84.27
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
29.60
145.02
0.22
145.02
0.22
1.43
0.00
646.49
1.00
647.92
1.00
29.60
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.05
0.05
286.58
45582.89
70.16
45582.89
70.16
USNPS
Total
0.44 368.53
0.57
952.96
1.47
240.87
0.37
500.41
0.77
6859.14
10.56
23.00
0.04 113.42
0.17
17273.81 26.59
6859.14
10.56 309.58
0.48 722.82
1.11
64967.26 100.00
46240.08 71.17
Green-winged teal
MiDNR
Status 4
12.96
USFS
0.09
Wood duck
MiDNR
Status 4
17.46
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Canada goose
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Trumpeter swan
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Black-crowned night-heron
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
0.17
0.02
138.03
14.97
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
2.01
1.30
0.14
1.30
0.14
0.06
0.01
18.51
2.01
18.57
2.01
2.01
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.22
0.22
24.12
680.42
73.80
680.42
73.80
146
2.62
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
29.18
3.16
1.64
0.18
6.78
0.74
54.95
5.96
0.75
0.08
0.23
0.02
186.96 20.28
54.95
5.96
24.87
2.70
1.87
0.20
922.02 100.00
699.10 75.82
DRAFT 02/01/05
abnjb10040
American black duck
MiDNR
Status 1
10.83
0.22
Status 2
32.63
0.67
Status 3
450.33
9.31
Status 4
Total
0.64
0.01
494.43
10.22
abnjb10060
Status 1
36.77
0.09
Status 2
128.47
0.30
Status 3
3027.33
7.05
Status 4
4.13
0.01
3196.70
7.44
abnjb10110
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
6.85
0.99
Status 3
124.60
18.02
Total
0.11
0.02
131.56
19.02
abnjb10130
Status 1
5.61
0.20
Status 2
18.02
0.64
Status 3
268.57
9.57
Total
0.45
0.02
292.65
10.43
abnjb10150
Status 1
0.72
0.22
Status 2
4.20
1.28
Status 3
16.12
4.91
0.00
0.00
21.04
6.40
Total
abnjb10160
Status 1
5.82
2.46
Status 2
2.84
1.20
Status 3
48.56
20.55
Total
0.07
3.18
0.07
0.16
0.00
111.59
2.31
111.75
2.31
5.73
USFWS
0.12
47.98
3946.82
81.60
3946.82
81.60
0.99
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
64.54
1.33
15.88
0.33
48.51
1.00
202.18
4.18
7.21
0.15
1.65
0.03
664.71 13.74
202.18
4.18
55.19
1.14
17.53
0.36
4836.81 100.00
4059.05 83.92
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
13.89
32.01
32.01
0.07
0.07
0.53
0.00
425.66
0.99
426.19
0.99
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
205.11
1176.69
13.89
USFWS
0.03
0.03
37838.10
88.10
37838.10
88.10
2.74
21.26
0.48
0.05
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
255.77
0.60
29.88
0.07
158.35
0.37
10.65
0.02
4268.47
9.94
38267.89 89.10
1176.69
2.74 226.37
0.53
40.53
0.09
42950.48 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
2.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
15.08
2.18
15.10
2.18
2.75
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.40
0.40
465.43
67.29
465.43
67.29
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.75
0.40
0.00
0.00
6.85
0.99
0.00
Total
66.66
9.64
10.13
1.46
0.00
0.00
201.41 29.12
66.66
9.64
10.13
1.46
0.00
0.00
691.63 100.00
480.62 69.49
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
3.86
3.03
0.11
3.03
0.11
0.11
0.00
65.26
2.33
65.37
2.33
3.86
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.14
0.14
32.68
2280.91
81.28
2280.91
81.28
1.16
USNPS
Total
7.97
0.28
50.12
1.79
8.14
0.29
26.16
0.93
108.78
3.88
1.68
0.06
1.21
0.04
383.38 13.66
108.78
3.88
34.36
1.22
17.32
0.62
2806.28 100.00
2346.62 83.62
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
2.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
13.16
4.01
13.16
4.01
2.11
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.64
0.64
263.45
80.19
263.45
80.19
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.83
0.86
0.00
0.00
4.20
1.28
0.00
Total
27.81
8.46
0.97
0.30
0.00
0.00
44.90 13.67
27.81
8.46
0.97
0.30
0.00
0.00
328.54 100.00
276.61 84.19
Gadwall
MiDNR
Status 4
3.18
USFS
0.12
Northern shoveler
MiDNR
Status 4
5.73
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Blue-winged teal
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Northern pintail
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Mallard
MiDNR
Total
MiMilitary
0.01
0.00
57.23
24.22
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
3.28
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.71
0.72
1.71
0.72
3.28
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
1.39
1.39
148.55
62.86
148.55
62.86
147
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.10
3.85
0.00
0.00
2.84
1.20
0.00
Total
25.56
10.82
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
74.12 31.36
25.56
10.82
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
236.33 100.00
150.27 63.58
DRAFT 02/01/05
abnjb10180
American wigeon
MiDNR
Status 1
4.84
0.65
Status 2
6.49
0.87
Status 3
113.16
15.19
Status 4
Total
0.00
0.00
124.49
16.71
abnjb11030
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
0.11
0.33
Status 3
3.38
10.01
Status 4
0.00
0.00
Total
3.49
10.34
abnjb11040
Status 1
2.67
0.58
Status 2
4.58
1.00
Status 3
58.97
12.92
0.14
0.03
66.36
14.53
abnjb18010
Status 1
6.96
0.44
Status 2
11.22
0.71
Status 3
139.79
8.81
0.00
0.00
157.97
9.96
Total
abnjb20010
Status 1
5.66
0.19
Status 2
16.79
0.57
Status 3
175.88
5.97
Status 4
0.19
0.01
198.52
6.74
abnjb21010
0.07
0.55
0.07
0.00
0.00
20.42
2.74
20.42
2.74
3.49
USFWS
0.47
32.02
504.43
67.70
504.43
67.70
4.30
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
40.35
5.42
3.14
0.42
9.63
1.29
54.53
7.32
1.66
0.22
0.38
0.05
170.28 22.85
54.53
7.32
33.68
4.52
3.52
0.47
745.11 100.00
524.85 70.44
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.43
1.27
0.43
1.27
0.75
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
2.22
2.22
21.81
64.60
21.81
64.60
USFWS
USNPS
5.31
0.00
0.00
6.06 17.95
0.12
0.36
0.23
15.73
Total
0.68
1.68
4.98
0.17
0.50
0.00
0.00
5.23 15.49
1.68
4.98
5.48
16.23
0.12
0.36
33.76 100.00
22.24 65.88
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.27
0.65
0.14
0.65
0.14
0.02
0.00
11.13
2.44
11.15
2.44
0.27
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.06
0.06
10.71
336.14
73.62
336.14
73.62
2.35
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
13.65
2.99
3.33
0.73
7.91
1.73
27.32
5.98
0.00
0.00
0.65
0.14
87.61 19.19
27.32
5.98
10.71
2.35
3.98
0.87
456.58 100.00
347.41 76.09
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.95
0.82
0.05
0.82
0.05
0.04
0.00
25.02
1.58
25.06
1.58
0.95
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.06
0.06
24.15
1263.27
79.61
1263.27
79.61
1.52
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
32.06
2.02
7.74
0.49
18.96
1.19
105.69
6.66
0.00
0.00
1.14
0.07
247.48 15.60
105.69
6.66
24.15
1.52
8.88
0.56
1586.79 100.00
1288.29 81.19
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.54
1.39
1.39
0.05
0.05
0.02
0.00
61.06
2.07
61.08
2.07
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
22.25
83.67
0.54
USFWS
0.02
0.02
2562.12
86.97
2562.12
86.97
2.84
4.23
0.76
0.14
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
28.45
0.97
11.36
0.39
28.15
0.96
0.93
0.03
266.12
9.03
2623.37 89.05
83.67
2.84
26.48
0.90
12.29
0.42
2946.09 100.00
Common merganser
MiDNR
Status 1
5.65
0.27
Status 2
8.16
0.38
Status 3
129.94
6.13
Status 4
0.19
0.01
143.94
6.79
Total
0.55
USFS
0.47
Hooded merganser
MiDNR
Total
3.49
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Common goldeneye
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Ring-necked duck
MiDNR
Total
MiOther
Redhead
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.53
1.80
1.80
0.08
0.08
0.02
0.00
33.40
1.58
33.42
1.58
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
22.27
77.82
0.53
USFWS
0.03
0.03
1827.44
86.22
1827.44
86.22
148
3.67
0.00
1.05
0.00
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
28.45
1.34
11.40
0.54
19.56
0.92
0.98
0.05
210.56
9.93
1861.03 87.80
77.82
3.67
22.27
1.05
12.38
0.58
2119.60 100.00
DRAFT 02/01/05
abnjb21020
Red-breasted merganser
MiDNR
Status 1
5.65
0.30
Status 2
9.40
0.50
Status 3
103.01
5.48
Status 4
0.02
0.00
118.08
6.28
Total
abnjb22010
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
0.06
0.59
Status 3
0.54
5.33
Status 4
0.00
0.00
Total
0.60
5.92
abnka02010
Status 1
224.95
0.33
Status 2
240.02
0.35
Status 3
9517.94
13.88
9.42
0.01
9992.33
14.58
abnkc01010
Status 1
24.36
0.20
Status 2
76.64
0.64
Status 3
3101.19
26.01
Total
3.72
0.03
3205.91
26.89
abnkc10010
Status 1
269.07
0.40
Status 2
281.64
0.42
Status 3 12749.28
19.01
Total
14.47
0.02
13314.46
19.85
abnkc11010
Status 1
47.49
0.10
Status 2
144.50
0.30
Status 3
4477.68
9.37
4.09
0.01
4673.76
9.78
Total
0.70
0.04
0.04
0.02
0.00
30.08
1.60
30.10
1.60
68.01
0.53
USFWS
22.27
0.03
1628.55
86.60
1628.55
86.60
3.62
0.00
1.18
0.00
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
28.45
1.51
11.40
0.61
20.80
1.11
0.98
0.05
172.72
9.18
1658.65 88.20
68.01
3.62
22.27
1.18
12.38
0.66
1880.62 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.40
3.94
0.40
3.94
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
2.66
0.13
0.27
2.66
8.54
84.22
8.54
84.22
1.28
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.27
2.66
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.59
0.00
0.00
0.87
8.58
0.20
0.00
1.97
Total
8.94 88.17
0.13
1.28
0.20
1.97
0.00
0.00
10.14 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
20.83
233.78
0.34
233.78
0.34
1.17
0.00
654.74
0.96
655.91
0.96
20.83
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.03
0.03
24.73
50721.07
73.99
50721.07
73.99
0.04
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
270.51
0.39
262.04
0.38
502.06
0.73
6509.74
9.50
16.01
0.02 117.25
0.17
16395.89 23.92
6509.74
9.50
40.74
0.06 379.29
0.55
68553.69 100.00
51385.23 74.96
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
16.40
14.43
0.12
14.43
0.12
1.99
0.02
123.37
1.03
125.36
1.05
16.40
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.14
0.14
32.67
6770.68
56.79
6770.68
56.79
1620.68
13.59
0.00
1620.68
13.59
32.67
USNPS
Total
0.27 100.28
0.84
173.71
1.46
21.04
0.18
97.68
0.82
14.14
0.12
4752.43 39.86
0.27 135.46
1.14
11921.59 100.00
0.00
6897.77 57.86
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
40.64
188.87
0.28
188.87
0.28
3.27
0.00
727.45
1.08
730.72
1.09
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
113.16
10231.09
40.64
USFWS
0.06
0.06
41571.65
61.98
41571.65
61.98 10231.09
USNPS
Total
0.17 492.58
0.73
915.45
1.36
237.48
0.35
519.12
0.77
16.43
0.02 141.01
0.21
23329.95 34.78
15.25 129.59
0.19 871.07
1.30
67078.09 100.00
15.25
42313.57 63.08
Northern harrier
MiDNR
Status 4
0.70
USFS
0.03
Bald eagle
MiDNR
Status 4
0.53
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Osprey
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Turkey vulture
MiDNR
Total
MiOther
Ruddy duck
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
15.51
104.85
0.22
104.85
0.22
0.45
0.00
385.03
0.81
385.48
0.81
15.51
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.03
0.03
282.64
40720.17
85.17
40720.17
85.17
149
0.59
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
345.64
0.72
42.82
0.09
187.32
0.39
1547.93
3.24
17.93
0.04
17.32
0.04
6166.16 12.90
1547.93
3.24 300.57
0.63
60.14
0.13
47808.41 100.00
41109.29 85.99
DRAFT 02/01/05
abnkc12020
Sharp-shinned hawk
MiDNR
Status 1
238.44
0.44
Status 2
198.09
0.37
Status 3
8794.57
16.23
Status 4
Total
9.39
0.02
9240.49
17.05
abnkc12040
Status 1
260.92
0.35
Status 2
297.96
0.40
Status 3 12293.84
16.67
Total
13.07
0.02
12865.79
17.45
abnkc12060
Status 1
238.44
0.48
Status 2
173.11
0.35
Status 3
8487.41
16.98
Total
9.39
0.02
8908.35
17.83
abnkc19030
Status 1
189.88
0.36
Status 2
222.14
0.42
Status 3
8370.33
15.77
Total
7.37
0.01
8789.72
16.56
abnkc19050
Status 1
245.28
0.43
Status 2
233.84
0.41
Status 3
9504.49
16.49
Total
11.25
0.02
9994.86
17.34
abnkc19110
Status 1
246.77
0.27
Status 2
292.36
0.32
Status 3 10723.09
11.78
Total
0.32
171.94
0.32
0.92
0.00
523.28
0.97
524.20
0.97
21.30
USFWS
0.04
53.14
35361.32
65.25
35361.32
65.25
USNPS
Total
0.10 396.94
0.73
709.82
1.31
241.21
0.45
439.30
0.81
8053.47
14.86
8.40
0.02 120.05
0.22
17149.35 31.65
8053.47
14.86
61.54
0.11 758.20
1.40
54192.46 100.00
35893.99 66.23
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
42.82
186.55
0.25
186.55
0.25
3.00
0.00
728.31
0.99
731.31
0.99
42.82
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.06
0.06
75.05
49203.68
66.73
49203.68
66.73
USNPS
Total
0.10 489.42
0.66
868.21
1.18
231.49
0.31
529.45
0.72
9765.24
13.24
14.69
0.02 134.10
0.18
22397.42 30.37
9765.24
13.24
89.74
0.12 855.01
1.16
73740.14 100.00
49945.06 67.73
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
18.84
171.94
0.34
171.94
0.34
0.92
0.00
497.70
1.00
498.62
1.00
18.84
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.04
0.04
53.14
31510.12
63.05
31510.12
63.05
USNPS
Total
0.11 396.94
0.79
707.36
1.42
241.21
0.48
414.32
0.83
8053.47
16.12
0.00
0.00 120.05
0.24
16833.79 33.69
8053.47
16.12
53.14
0.11 758.20
1.52
49972.68 100.00
32017.21 64.07
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
34.66
61.17
0.12
61.17
0.12
2.79
0.01
527.71
0.99
530.50
1.00
34.66
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.07
0.07
78.41
37065.24
69.83
37065.24
69.83
USNPS
Total
0.15 222.11
0.42
525.06
0.99
231.02
0.44
453.16
0.85
5937.37
11.19
16.37
0.03 116.48
0.22
14504.51 27.32
5937.37
11.19
94.78
0.18 569.61
1.07
53083.05 100.00
37600.32 70.83
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
28.55
146.83
0.25
146.83
0.25
2.62
0.00
531.49
0.92
534.11
0.93
28.55
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.05
0.05
44.13
38940.52
67.55
38940.52
67.55
USNPS
Total
0.08 413.16
0.72
731.12
1.27
240.91
0.42
474.75
0.82
7176.44
12.45
7.84
0.01 116.12
0.20
16954.34 29.41
7176.44
12.45
51.97
0.09 770.19
1.34
57643.47 100.00
39483.26 68.50
Red-tailed hawk
MiDNR
Status 4
171.94
USFS
0.04
Broad-winged hawk
MiDNR
Status 4
21.30
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Red-shouldered hawk
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Northern goshawk
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Cooper's hawk
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
11.36
0.01
11273.58
12.39
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
27.65
253.44
0.28
253.44
0.28
1.09
0.00
751.29
0.83
752.38
0.83
27.65
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.03
0.03
231.08
69383.28
76.25
69383.28
76.25
150
USNPS
Total
0.25 358.88
0.39
864.38
0.95
266.27
0.29
558.63
0.61
8312.50
9.14
18.53
0.02 116.87
0.13
19425.52 21.35
8312.50
9.14 249.61
0.27 742.02
0.82
90994.46 100.00
70145.93 77.09
DRAFT 02/01/05
abnkd06020
American kestrel
MiMilitary
MiDNR
Status 1
193.14
0.27
Status 2
202.93
0.28
Status 3
6523.22
8.96
8.52
0.01
6927.81
9.51
Status 4
Total
abnkd06030
Status 1
68.14
0.52
Status 2
84.64
0.64
Status 3
3092.25
23.47
Total
1.88
0.01
3246.91
24.65
abnkd06070
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
0.00
0.00
Status 3
0.61
0.13
Status 4
0.00
0.00
Total
0.61
0.13
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
50.15
0.20
Status 3
351.02
1.41
Status 4
0.00
0.00
401.17
1.62
abnlc09010
Status 1
40.02
0.30
Status 2
75.38
0.56
Status 3
3507.17
26.17
Total
4.66
0.03
3627.23
27.06
abnlc11010
Status 1
89.41
0.54
Status 2
69.17
0.42
Status 3
3276.78
19.86
Total
183.01
0.25
0.60
0.00
541.09
0.74
541.69
0.74
12.32
0.02
59899.00
82.26
59899.00
82.26
USNPS
Total
0.02 269.63
0.37
491.69
0.68
227.51
0.31
430.44
0.59
4620.51
6.35
14.54
0.02 100.78
0.14
11442.66 15.72
4620.51
6.35
31.14
0.04 597.92
0.82
72813.40 100.00
60448.61 83.02
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
25.74
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.18
0.02
140.96
1.07
143.14
1.09
25.74
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.20
0.20
63.47
7386.11
56.07
7386.11
56.07
2021.53
15.35
0.00
2021.53
15.35
63.47
USNPS
Total
0.48 218.80
1.66
376.15
2.86
37.38
0.28
122.02
0.93
29.64
0.23
5145.60 39.06
0.48 285.82
2.17
13172.72 100.00
0.00
7528.95 57.16
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.62
0.56
2.62
0.56
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.00
0.05
0.02
0.00
466.28
99.26
466.28
99.26
0.01
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.19
0.04
0.19
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.66
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
468.90 99.81
0.05
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.04
469.77 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
2.67
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.00
125.83
0.51
125.92
0.51
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.01
45.25
2.67
0.01
24246.38
97.65
24246.38
97.65
0.18
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.67
0.01
1.98
0.01
52.13
0.21
0.00
0.00
402.39
1.62
6.03
0.00
0.02
Total
24372.21 98.16
45.25
0.18
6.03
0.02
1.98
0.01
24829.40 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
24.78
37.58
0.28
37.58
0.28
0.15
0.00
146.01
1.09
146.16
1.09
24.78
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.18
0.18
USFWS
68.54
6308.05
47.06
6308.05
47.06
2987.51
22.29
0.00
2987.51
22.29
68.54
USNPS
Total
0.51 152.64
1.14
285.98
2.13
22.97
0.17
98.35
0.73
27.51
0.21
6559.92 48.94
0.51 203.12
1.52
13402.97 100.00
0.00
6458.72 48.19
Ruffed grouse
MiDNR
Status 4
0.25
USFWS
16.60
Spruce grouse
MiDNR
Status 4
183.01
USFS
0.02
Ring-necked pheasant
MiDNR
Total
12.32
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Peregrine falcon
MiDNR
abnlc07010
Nature
Conservancy
Merlin
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
4.98
0.03
3440.34
20.85
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
6.25
35.63
0.22
35.63
0.22
0.39
0.00
181.98
1.10
182.37
1.11
6.25
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.04
0.04
USFWS
98.34
10707.38
64.88
10707.38
64.88
151
1759.72
10.66
4.46
1759.72
10.66 102.80
USNPS
Total
0.60 224.97
1.36
418.97
2.54
30.33
0.18
99.50
0.60
12.31
0.07
5089.29 30.84
0.62 267.61
1.62
16502.10 100.00
0.03
10894.34 66.02
DRAFT 02/01/05
abnlc13030
Sharp-tailed grouse
MiDNR
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
0.00
0.00
Status 3
163.51
23.85
Status 4
Total
0.72
0.11
164.23
23.96
abnlc14010
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
106.47
0.26
Status 3
2350.49
5.75
Status 4
3.99
0.01
2460.95
6.02
abnlc21020
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
25.22
0.14
Status 3
189.14
1.02
Status 4
0.00
0.00
214.36
1.16
abnme01010
0.00
0.00
0.00
Status 3
370.95
52.60
Total
0.00
0.00
370.95
52.60
abnme05020
0.00
4.51
0.21
Status 3
398.86
18.40
Total
0.09
0.00
403.46
18.61
abnme05030
Status 1
0.83
0.03
Status 2
14.29
0.52
Status 3
700.00
25.33
Total
6.06
0.00
4.65
0.68
4.65
0.68
0.00
0.00
424.63
61.95
424.63
61.95
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
50.41
7.35
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
255.47 37.27
50.41
7.35
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
685.47 100.00
430.00 62.73
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
4.27
138.19
138.19
0.34
0.34
0.15
0.00
265.74
0.65
265.89
0.65
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.01
1083.78
4.27
0.01
36855.52
90.22
36855.52
90.22
2.65
USFWS
USNPS
5.76
0.00
0.00
10.03
0.02
24.97
0.06
131.44
0.32
0.00
0.00
3583.57
8.77
10.96
0.01
0.03
Total
37125.25 90.88
1083.78
2.65
16.72
0.04
24.97
0.06
40850.29 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
1.78
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
62.26
0.34
62.26
0.34
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.01
2.18
1.78
0.01
18246.20
98.45
18246.20
98.45
0.01
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.78
0.01
0.00
0.00
25.22
0.14
0.00
0.00
197.35
1.06
6.03
0.00
0.03
Total
18308.46 98.79
2.18
0.01
6.03
0.03
0.00
0.00
18532.81 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
2.17
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.00
0.43
3.00
0.43
2.17
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.31
0.31
138.34
19.62
138.34
19.62
190.79
27.05
USNPS
0.00
0.00
Total
192.96 27.36
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
370.95 52.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 190.79
27.05
0.00
0.00
705.25 100.00
141.34 20.04
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
1.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
20.68
0.95
20.68
0.95
1.60
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.07
0.07
1422.95
65.64
1422.95
65.64
248.91
11.48
USNPS
0.00
0.00
Total
250.51 11.56
0.00
0.00
70.25
3.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
469.11 21.64
4.51
0.21
70.25
3.24 248.91
11.48
0.00
0.00
2167.85 100.00
1443.72 66.60
Virginia rail
MiDNR
Status 4
41.54
0.00
0.00
Status 2
Status 4
6.06
USFS
0.00
King rail
MiDNR
Status 1
41.54
0.00
Status 2
Status 4
0.00
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Yellow rail
MiDNR
Status 1
Nature
Conservancy
Northern bobwhite
MiDNR
Total
MiOther
Wild turkey
MiDNR
Total
MiMilitary
0.67
0.02
715.79
25.90
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
4.11
3.06
0.11
3.06
0.11
0.00
0.00
35.06
1.27
35.06
1.27
4.11
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.15
0.15
172.14
1601.78
57.96
1601.78
57.96
152
6.23
USNPS
Total
11.07
0.40
188.15
6.81
0.35
0.01
14.64
0.53
216.12
7.82
4.14
0.15
0.00
0.00
923.32 33.41
216.12
7.82 176.28
6.38
11.42
0.41
2763.62 100.00
1637.51 59.25
DRAFT 02/01/05
abnme08020
Sora
MiDNR
Status 1
15.77
0.33
Status 2
24.88
0.52
Status 3
993.32
20.76
Status 4
Total
0.82
0.02
1034.79
21.63
abnme13010
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
6.41
0.50
Status 3
193.22
15.21
Total
0.00
0.00
199.63
15.72
abnme14020
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
15.70
0.36
Status 3
963.79
22.09
Total
2.65
0.06
982.14
22.51
abnmk01010
Status 1
37.73
0.07
Status 2
148.20
0.26
Status 3
4577.34
8.03
5.96
0.01
4769.23
8.37
Total
abnnb03070
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
6.84
8.84
Status 3
3.06
3.96
Status 4
0.00
0.00
Total
9.90
12.80
0.10
4.70
0.10
0.11
0.00
65.32
1.37
65.43
1.37
3.98
USFWS
0.08
184.49
3277.28
68.51
3277.28
68.51
3.86
USNPS
Total
11.44
0.24
215.68
4.51
2.33
0.05
27.21
0.57
190.71
3.99
8.75
0.18
0.00
0.00
1197.59 25.03
190.71
3.99 193.24
4.04
13.77
0.29
4783.90 100.00
3343.42 69.89
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.86
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
21.04
1.66
21.04
1.66
0.86
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.07
0.07
1021.13
80.40
1021.13
80.40
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.86
0.07
1.35
0.11
7.76
0.61
0.00
Total
20.88
1.64
5.13
0.40
0.00
0.00
219.23 17.26
20.88
1.64
5.13
0.40
1.35
0.11
1270.02 100.00
1042.17 82.06
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
3.64
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.34
0.01
55.32
1.27
55.66
1.28
3.64
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.08
0.08
15.71
3029.91
69.45
3029.91
69.45
0.36
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
19.35
0.44
3.64
0.08
19.34
0.44
262.38
6.01
9.64
0.22
0.00
0.00
1236.15 28.33
262.38
6.01
25.35
0.58
3.64
0.08
4362.72 100.00
3087.88 70.78
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
24.53
11.37
0.02
11.37
0.02
2.00
0.00
372.42
0.65
374.42
0.66
24.53
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.04
0.04
216.33
49341.33
86.58
49341.33
86.58
2113.37
3.71
0.00
2113.37
3.71 216.33
0.38
USNPS
Total
94.54
0.17
373.13
0.65
33.74
0.06
181.94
0.32
11.30
0.02
6715.38 11.78
0.38 139.58
0.24
56990.16 100.00
0.00
49719.71 87.24
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.33
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.43
USFWS
USNPS
0.06
0.00
0.08
0.00
16.54 21.38
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.29
4.25
3.29
4.25
2.54
0.33
0.43
44.69
57.78
44.69
57.78
3.28
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
0.39
0.50
23.38 30.23
5.60
7.24
47.98 62.03
2.54
3.28
0.06
0.08
16.54 21.38
77.35 100.00
Killdeer
MiDNR
Status 1
0.03
0.00
Status 2
41.86
0.17
Status 3
146.01
0.61
Status 4
1.00
0.00
188.90
0.79
Total
4.70
USFS
0.08
Piping plover
MiDNR
abnnb03090
3.98
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Sandhill crane
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
American coot
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Common moorhen
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
1.85
1.07
1.07
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
120.54
0.50
120.57
0.50
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.01
27.77
1.85
0.01
23577.13
98.48
23577.13
98.48
153
0.12
USFWS
USNPS
0.83
0.00
0.00
2.71
0.01
18.37
0.08
60.23
0.25
0.06
0.00
179.99
0.75
5.05
0.00
0.02
Total
23698.67 98.99
27.77
0.12
5.88
0.02
18.43
0.08
23941.60 100.00
DRAFT 02/01/05
abnnf04020
Spotted sandpiper
MiDNR
Status 1
0.01
0.01
Status 2
11.17
6.21
Status 3
9.14
5.08
Status 4
0.02
0.01
20.34
11.31
Total
abnnf06010
Status 1
1.19
0.00
Status 2
66.00
0.22
Status 3
1155.13
3.88
Status 4
1.53
0.01
1223.85
4.11
abnnf18010
Status 1
66.19
0.30
Status 2
131.94
0.60
Status 3
5165.53
23.52
Total
5.79
0.03
5369.45
24.45
abnnf19020
Status 1
30.11
0.09
Status 2
137.13
0.41
Status 3
5332.82
15.88
Total
7.70
0.02
5507.76
16.41
abnnf20010
0.60
0.60
0.33
0.33
0.00
0.00
5.07
2.82
5.07
2.82
USFS
0.33
3.82
0.59
0.33
132.98
73.92
132.98
73.92
2.12
USFWS
USNPS
0.38
0.00
0.00
16.10
8.95
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.21
0.00
Total
0.98
0.54
27.27 15.16
13.57
7.54
138.07 76.75
3.82
2.12
0.38
0.21
16.11
8.96
179.89 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
2.76
77.15
77.15
0.26
0.26
0.06
0.00
189.99
0.64
190.05
0.64
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.01
381.72
2.76
0.01
27868.02
93.59
27868.02
93.59
1.28
USFWS
USNPS
5.82
0.00
0.00
9.77
0.03
24.84
0.08
90.84
0.31
1.14
0.00
1615.20
5.42
0.00
0.02
0.00
Total
28059.54 94.24
381.72
1.28
5.82
0.02
25.98
0.09
29775.35 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
25.22
20.81
0.09
20.81
0.09
2.07
0.01
254.06
1.16
256.13
1.17
25.22
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.11
0.11
290.93
13459.51
61.29
13459.51
61.29
2382.64
10.85
10.86
2382.64
10.85 301.79
1.32
USNPS
Total
97.80
0.45
480.14
2.19
27.69
0.13
159.63
0.73
17.78
0.08
7599.69 34.61
1.37 143.27
0.65
21958.82 100.00
0.05
13719.36 62.48
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
8.56
146.90
0.44
146.90
0.44
0.36
0.00
321.90
0.96
322.26
0.96
8.56
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.03
0.03
92.82
25362.51
75.54
25362.51
75.54
0.28
USNPS
Total
4.55
0.01
136.04
0.41
85.58
0.25
222.71
0.66
2025.11
6.03
11.16
0.03
6.27
0.02
7522.62 22.41
2025.11
6.03 103.98
0.31
96.40
0.29
33573.48 100.00
25692.11 76.53
Wilson's phalarope
MiDNR
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
0.34
1.41
Status 3
0.70
2.90
Status 4
0.00
0.00
Total
1.04
4.32
abnnm03100
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.95
3.94
0.95
3.94
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.00
0.32
0.00
0.00
21.24
88.13
21.24
88.13
1.33
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.34
1.41
0.00
0.00
1.57
6.51
0.55
0.00
2.28
Total
22.19 92.07
0.32
1.33
0.55
2.28
0.00
0.00
24.10 100.00
Ring-billed gull
MiDNR
Status 1
5.30
0.01
Status 2
59.19
0.16
Status 3
311.80
0.85
Status 4
1.18
0.00
377.47
1.03
Total
0.59
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
American woodcock
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Common snipe
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Upland sandpiper
MiDNR
Total
MiMilitary
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
5.56
2.19
2.19
0.01
0.01
0.05
0.00
177.00
0.48
177.05
0.48
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
23.24
81.31
5.56
USFWS
0.02
0.02
35863.50
98.06
35863.50
98.06
154
0.22
0.00
0.06
0.00
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
34.10
0.09
42.62
0.12
101.81
0.28
0.97
0.00
396.32
1.08
36041.68 98.54
81.31
0.22
23.24
0.06
43.59
0.12
36573.91 100.00
DRAFT 02/01/05
abnnm03120
Herring gull
MiDNR
Status 1
5.38
0.20
Status 2
33.62
1.28
Status 3
138.44
5.26
Status 4
0.08
0.00
177.52
6.74
Total
abnnm08020
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
2.48
3.96
Status 3
5.19
8.29
Status 4
0.00
0.00
Total
7.67
12.25
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
2.92
2.05
Status 3
9.84
6.89
Status 4
0.07
0.05
12.83
8.99
abnnm08090
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
1.51
0.79
Status 3
56.46
29.54
Total
0.03
0.02
58.00
30.35
abnnm10020
Status 1
15.24
0.49
Status 2
25.06
0.81
Status 3
835.36
26.86
Total
0.52
0.02
876.18
28.17
abnpb04040
Status 1
17.64
0.13
Status 2
51.24
0.39
Status 3
2388.54
18.15
Total
2.19
0.08
0.08
0.02
0.00
52.07
1.98
52.09
1.98
85.41
3.46
0.13
2265.06
86.03
2265.06
86.03
3.24
USFWS
USNPS
Total
1.48
0.00
0.00
10.32
0.39
40.77
1.55
74.39
2.83
0.95
0.04
230.97
8.77
3.96
0.06
0.15
2317.21 88.01
85.41
3.24
5.44
0.21
41.72
1.58
2632.89 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.79
1.26
0.79
1.26
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.24
0.43
0.15
0.24
53.48
85.42
53.48
85.42
0.69
USFWS
USNPS
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.38
0.00
0.00
2.48
3.96
0.00
0.00
5.62
8.98
0.00
0.14
0.00
Total
54.27 86.68
0.43
0.69
0.09
0.14
0.00
0.00
62.61 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.28
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.69
1.88
2.69
1.88
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.20
3.19
0.28
0.20
121.77
85.29
121.77
85.29
2.23
USFWS
USNPS
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.51
0.36
1.78
1.25
4.70
3.29
0.00
0.00
13.03
9.13
0.00
0.16
0.00
Total
124.53 87.22
3.19
2.23
0.23
0.16
1.78
1.25
142.77 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
1.73
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.61
1.89
3.61
1.89
1.73
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.91
0.91
92.78
48.55
92.78
48.55
USFWS
USNPS
1.41
0.00
0.00
3.14
1.64
0.00
0.00
1.51
0.79
0.74
Total
33.57
17.57
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
90.03 47.11
33.57
17.57
1.41
0.74
0.00
0.00
191.10 100.00
96.42 50.46
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
5.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.00
43.20
1.39
43.29
1.39
5.65
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.18
0.18
USFWS
180.51
1684.14
54.14
1684.14
54.14
5.80
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
201.40
6.47
0.02
0.00
25.08
0.81
315.60
10.15
5.13
0.16
0.01
0.00
1156.19 37.17
315.60
10.15 185.64
5.97
0.03
0.00
3110.53 100.00
1727.86 55.55
Mourning dove
MiDNR
Status 4
2.19
USFS
0.13
Black tern
MiDNR
Status 4
3.46
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Forster's tern
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Common tern
MiDNR
Total
MiOther
Caspian tern
MiDNR
abnnm08070
MiMilitary
1.63
0.01
2459.05
18.68
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
11.03
40.79
0.31
40.79
0.31
0.23
0.00
153.20
1.16
153.43
1.17
11.03
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.08
0.08
USFWS
41.06
7859.23
59.71
7859.23
59.71
155
2491.36
18.93
1.38
2491.36
18.93
42.44
0.31
USNPS
Total
65.77
0.50
135.50
1.03
22.12
0.17
73.36
0.56
17.56
0.13
4939.86 37.53
0.32 105.45
0.80
13162.78 100.00
0.01
8014.06 60.88
DRAFT 02/01/05
abnrb02010
Black-billed cuckoo
MiDNR
Status 1
31.10
0.30
Status 2
44.35
0.43
Status 3
2093.45
20.52
Status 4
Total
1.59
0.02
2170.49
21.28
abnrb02020
Status 1
223.66
0.40
Status 2
203.08
0.36
Status 3
8479.70
15.19
Total
9.08
0.02
8915.52
15.97
abnsb01030
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
161.13
0.40
Status 3
5323.85
13.37
Total
8.09
0.02
5493.07
13.80
abnsb05010
Status 1
240.38
0.37
Status 2
235.53
0.36
Status 3 10024.32
15.51
Total
10.01
0.02
10510.24
16.26
abnsb12020
Status 1
193.43
0.32
Status 2
255.70
0.42
Status 3
9996.69
16.34
Total
9.16
0.01
10454.98
17.09
abnsb12040
Status 1
24.35
1.20
Status 2
33.67
1.66
Status 3
428.56
21.12
Total
0.23
23.56
0.23
0.22
0.00
119.43
1.17
119.65
1.17
4.83
USFWS
0.05
97.71
6981.83
68.45
6981.83
68.45
0.96
USNPS
Total
23.15
0.23
156.79
1.54
14.02
0.14
58.37
0.57
746.19
7.32
4.17
0.04
14.49
0.14
2882.08 28.26
746.19
7.32 101.88
1.00
51.66
0.51
10200.09 100.00
7102.85 69.64
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
19.71
132.58
0.24
132.58
0.24
1.07
0.00
522.36
0.94
523.43
0.94
19.71
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.04
0.04
108.72
40212.04
72.03
40212.04
72.03
USNPS
Total
0.19 291.38
0.52
643.47
1.15
224.32
0.40
427.40
0.77
5264.35
9.43
17.95
0.03 119.28
0.21
14014.93 25.10
5264.35
9.43 126.67
0.23 634.98
1.14
55829.28 100.00
40743.48 72.98
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
9.93
213.70
0.54
213.70
0.54
0.23
0.00
353.09
0.89
353.32
0.89
9.93
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.02
0.02
31384.75
78.82
31384.75
78.82
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.93
0.02
79.17
0.20
240.30
0.60
0.00
Total
2267.47
5.69
15.20
0.04
0.00
0.00
7820.45 19.64
2267.47
5.69
15.20
0.04
79.17
0.20
39816.61 100.00
31745.93 79.73
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
29.09
177.46
0.27
177.46
0.27
1.34
0.00
629.43
0.97
630.77
0.98
29.09
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.05
0.05
USFWS
54.96
44002.01
68.09
44002.01
68.09
USNPS
Total
0.09 415.81
0.64
740.24
1.15
252.28
0.39
487.81
0.75
8411.80
13.02
14.57
0.02 125.39
0.19
18754.88 29.02
8411.80
13.02
69.53
0.11 793.48
1.23
64624.38 100.00
44641.45 69.08
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
36.57
154.52
0.25
154.52
0.25
2.71
0.00
591.00
0.97
593.71
0.97
36.57
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.06
0.06
USFWS
68.13
41242.20
67.41
41242.20
67.41
USNPS
Total
0.11 214.74
0.35
512.87
0.84
240.12
0.39
495.82
0.81
8040.95
13.14
13.68
0.02 122.65
0.20
18331.20 29.96
8040.95
13.14
81.81
0.13 577.51
0.94
61182.25 100.00
41842.36 68.39
Great gray owl
MiDNR
Status 4
23.56
USFS
0.05
Barred owl
MiDNR
Status 4
4.83
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Great horned owl
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Eastern screech-owl
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Yellow-billed cuckoo
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
0.40
0.02
486.98
24.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
4.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
24.36
1.20
24.36
1.20
4.65
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.23
0.23
854.53
42.11
854.53
42.11
156
USFWS
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
0.00
29.00
1.43
0.00
0.00
33.67
1.66
0.00
658.67
32.46
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1087.23 53.58
658.67
32.46
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2029.19 100.00
879.29 43.33
DRAFT 02/01/05
abnsb13010
Long-eared owl
MiDNR
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
10.18
0.32
Status 3
382.16
11.95
Status 4
Total
0.00
0.00
392.34
12.27
abnsb13040
Status 1
14.75
0.18
Status 2
36.39
0.45
Status 3
485.08
6.04
Status 4
1.23
0.02
537.45
6.69
abnsb15020
Status 1
68.48
0.27
Status 2
121.85
0.48
Status 3
5775.81
22.82
Total
5.76
0.02
5971.90
23.59
abnta02020
Status 1
11.63
0.03
Status 2
135.51
0.29
Status 3
3960.69
8.53
3.11
0.01
4110.94
8.85
Total
abnta07070
Status 1
223.61
0.28
Status 2
227.48
0.28
Status 3
8435.14
10.54
Total
9.55
0.01
8895.78
11.11
abnua03010
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.96
0.06
42.50
1.33
44.46
1.39
1.04
0.03
2540.51
79.47
2540.51
79.47
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.04
0.03
0.00
0.00
10.18
0.32
0.00
Total
218.39
6.83
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
602.51 18.85
218.39
6.83
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3196.74 100.00
2583.01 80.80
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.96
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
45.16
0.56
45.16
0.56
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
13.38
199.92
0.96
USFWS
0.01
0.01
7232.81
90.08
7232.81
90.08
2.49
0.00
0.17
0.00
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
29.09
0.36
0.00
0.00
36.39
0.45
0.00
0.00
685.00
8.53
7279.20 90.65
199.92
2.49
13.38
0.17
0.00
0.00
8029.68 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
26.14
77.26
0.31
77.26
0.31
2.24
0.01
297.12
1.17
299.36
1.18
26.14
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.10
0.10
64.55
13497.76
53.33
13497.76
53.33
5063.74
20.01
0.00
5063.74
20.01
64.55
USNPS
Total
0.26 222.34
0.88
381.51
1.51
58.02
0.23
179.87
0.71
29.96
0.12
10949.01 43.26
0.26 310.32
1.23
25311.03 100.00
0.00
13800.64 54.52
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
11.45
139.09
0.30
139.09
0.30
0.22
0.00
347.52
0.75
347.74
0.75
11.45
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.02
0.02
51.07
39076.63
84.13
39076.63
84.13
2575.53
5.54
7.28
2575.53
5.54
58.35
0.11
USNPS
Total
35.30
0.08
109.45
0.24
72.18
0.16
207.69
0.45
21.52
0.05
6704.33 14.43
0.13 129.00
0.28
46448.73 100.00
0.02
39427.26 84.88
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
13.78
229.67
0.29
229.67
0.29
0.77
0.00
644.23
0.80
645.00
0.81
13.78
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.02
0.02
23.79
63697.61
79.57
63697.61
79.57
0.03
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
261.18
0.33
253.63
0.32
481.11
0.60
6168.10
7.71
14.15
0.02 111.63
0.14
14959.46 18.69
6168.10
7.71
37.94
0.05 365.26
0.46
80053.14 100.00
64351.39 80.39
Chimney swift
MiDNR
Status 1
0.03
0.00
Status 2
10.27
0.25
Status 3
40.03
0.97
Status 4
0.11
0.00
50.44
1.22
Total
0.00
USFS
0.03
Whip-poor-will
MiDNR
Status 4
1.04
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Common nighthawk
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Northern saw-whet owl
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Short-eared owl
MiDNR
Total
MiMilitary
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.22
0.88
0.88
0.02
0.02
0.00
0.00
42.67
1.03
42.67
1.03
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.01
13.13
0.22
0.01
4020.47
97.35
4020.47
97.35
157
0.32
USFWS
USNPS
0.02
0.06
0.00
0.33
0.01
0.92
0.02
11.19
0.27
0.08
0.00
55.10
1.33
0.98
0.00
0.02
Total
4063.25 98.39
13.13
0.32
1.00
0.02
1.06
0.03
4129.87 100.00
DRAFT 02/01/05
abnuc45010
Ruby-throated hummingbird
MiDNR
Status 1
183.19
0.32
Status 2
221.63
0.39
Status 3
8555.19
14.96
Status 4
Total
6.59
0.01
8966.60
15.68
abnxd01020
Status 1
5.61
0.17
Status 2
16.65
0.51
Status 3
180.07
5.57
Status 4
0.20
0.01
202.53
6.26
abnyf04040
Status 1
133.80
0.34
Status 2
134.80
0.35
Status 3
4395.57
11.30
Total
3.90
0.01
4668.07
12.00
abnyf04170
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
50.31
0.36
Status 3
1765.21
12.66
Total
1.41
0.01
1816.93
13.03
abnyf05010
Status 1
220.46
0.52
Status 2
140.47
0.33
Status 3
6357.37
15.03
Total
7.75
0.02
6726.05
15.90
abnyf07030
Status 1
222.80
0.40
Status 2
197.43
0.35
Status 3
7699.43
13.72
Total
0.27
151.58
0.27
2.58
0.00
565.40
0.99
567.98
0.99
30.46
USFWS
0.05
38.80
40998.96
71.70
40998.96
71.70
USNPS
Total
0.07 211.11
0.37
463.56
0.81
248.89
0.44
470.52
0.82
5837.96
10.21
10.37
0.02 117.81
0.21
14675.49 25.67
5837.96
10.21
49.17
0.09 577.81
1.01
57180.52 100.00
41570.95 72.70
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
2.72
1.67
1.67
0.05
0.05
0.02
0.00
71.48
2.21
71.50
2.21
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
22.28
80.34
2.72
USFWS
0.08
0.08
2836.92
87.68
2836.92
87.68
2.48
5.69
0.69
0.18
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
30.61
0.95
11.11
0.34
27.76
0.86
0.92
0.03
268.71
8.30
2908.60 89.89
80.34
2.48
27.97
0.86
12.03
0.37
3235.68 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
8.68
150.37
0.39
150.37
0.39
0.37
0.00
323.00
0.83
323.37
0.83
8.68
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.02
0.02
10.11
30015.21
77.15
30015.21
77.15
3374.34
8.67
8.50
3374.34
8.67
18.61
0.03
USNPS
Total
49.22
0.13
201.81
0.52
200.89
0.52
335.69
0.86
94.70
0.24
8023.85 20.63
0.05 344.81
0.89
38903.46 100.00
0.02
30342.11 77.99
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
7.62
18.92
0.14
18.92
0.14
0.11
0.00
140.80
1.01
140.91
1.01
7.62
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.05
0.05
11408.92
81.81
11408.92
81.81
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.62
0.05
87.04
0.62
137.35
0.98
0.00
Total
455.68
3.27
9.52
0.07
0.00
0.00
2249.44 16.13
455.68
3.27
9.52
0.07
87.04
0.62
13945.54 100.00
11551.13 82.83
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
10.04
131.84
0.31
131.84
0.31
0.73
0.00
388.15
0.92
388.88
0.92
10.04
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.02
0.02
USFWS
12.31
28799.91
68.07
28799.91
68.07
USNPS
Total
0.03 330.70
0.78
573.51
1.36
220.18
0.52
360.65
0.85
5577.32
13.18
7.81
0.02 102.48
0.24
12177.55 28.78
5577.32
13.18
20.12
0.05 653.36
1.54
42307.52 100.00
29195.81 69.01
Downy woodpecker
MiDNR
Status 4
151.58
USFS
0.05
Yellow-bellied sapsucker
MiDNR
Status 4
30.46
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Red-bellied woodpecker
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Red-headed woodpecker
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Belted kingfisher
MiDNR
Total
MiMilitary
8.61
0.02
8128.27
14.48
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
18.35
138.13
0.25
138.13
0.25
1.12
0.00
531.54
0.95
532.66
0.95
18.35
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.03
0.03
USFWS
13.93
40652.87
72.42
40652.87
72.42
158
USNPS
Total
0.02 350.03
0.62
605.11
1.08
231.91
0.41
429.34
0.76
5945.10
10.59
14.62
0.03 107.92
0.19
13906.32 24.77
5945.10
10.59
28.55
0.05 689.86
1.23
56133.79 100.00
41193.02 73.38
DRAFT 02/01/05
abnyf07040
Hairy woodpecker
MiDNR
Status 1
222.77
0.41
Status 2
190.98
0.35
Status 3
7668.09
14.21
Status 4
Total
8.50
0.02
8090.34
14.99
abnyf07090
Status 1
27.34
0.21
Status 2
89.68
0.68
Status 3
3295.97
25.01
Total
0.49
0.00
3413.48
25.90
abnyf10020
Status 1
240.25
0.34
Status 2
249.18
0.36
Status 3
9948.42
14.21
Total
10.05
0.01
10447.90
14.93
abnyf12020
Status 1
159.89
0.43
Status 2
122.06
0.33
Status 3
4822.76
12.95
Total
2.75
0.01
5107.46
13.71
abpae32010
Status 1
40.02
0.23
Status 2
80.79
0.47
Status 3
4368.66
25.56
Total
4.66
0.03
4494.13
26.29
abpae32060
Status 1
132.61
0.48
Status 2
95.50
0.34
Status 3
3336.83
11.97
Total
0.25
137.40
0.25
1.12
0.00
504.48
0.93
505.60
0.94
18.20
0.03
USFWS
13.92
38554.41
71.46
38554.41
71.46
USNPS
Total
0.03 350.03
0.65
604.92
1.12
231.04
0.43
422.02
0.78
5932.80
11.00
13.91
0.03 107.88
0.20
13861.20 25.69
5932.80
11.00
27.83
0.05 688.95
1.28
53955.53 100.00
39067.39 72.41
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
21.78
78.25
0.59
78.25
0.59
0.00
0.00
144.80
1.10
144.80
1.10
21.78
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.17
0.17
USFWS
71.64
6223.48
47.23
6223.48
47.23
2966.56
22.51
0.00
2966.56
22.51
71.64
USNPS
Total
0.54 226.61
1.72
347.37
2.64
17.37
0.13
107.05
0.81
13.68
0.10
6354.46 48.22
0.54 257.66
1.96
13177.65 100.00
0.00
6368.77 48.33
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
24.96
250.61
0.36
250.61
0.36
1.04
0.00
674.38
0.96
675.42
0.97
24.96
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.04
0.04
USFWS
59.00
49293.23
70.43
49293.23
70.43
USNPS
Total
0.08 399.28
0.57
723.49
1.03
266.30
0.38
515.48
0.74
8439.07
12.06
11.00
0.02 120.96
0.17
18771.10 26.82
8439.07
12.06
70.00
0.10 786.54
1.12
69987.73 100.00
49977.66 71.41
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
13.32
48.92
0.13
48.92
0.13
0.92
0.00
356.97
0.96
357.89
0.96
13.32
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.04
0.04
USFWS
7.83
27212.95
73.07
27212.95
73.07
USNPS
Total
0.02 100.16
0.27
281.20
0.76
206.18
0.55
328.24
0.88
4084.72
10.97
0.00
0.00 100.92
0.27
9058.24 24.32
4084.72
10.97
7.83
0.02 407.26
1.09
37240.35 100.00
27572.67 74.04
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
25.26
40.33
0.24
40.33
0.24
2.16
0.01
193.87
1.13
196.03
1.15
25.26
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.15
0.15
USFWS
68.94
8581.76
50.21
8581.76
50.21
3482.18
20.37
0.00
3482.18
20.37
68.94
USNPS
Total
0.40 152.64
0.89
286.86
1.68
22.97
0.13
103.76
0.61
27.51
0.16
7920.84 46.34
0.40 203.12
1.19
17091.75 100.00
0.00
8780.29 51.37
Eastern wood-pewee
MiDNR
Status 4
137.40
USFS
0.03
Olive-sided flycatcher
MiDNR
Status 4
18.20
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Pileated woodpecker
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Northern flicker
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Black-backed woodpecker
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
3.23
0.01
3568.17
12.80
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
6.71
73.56
0.26
73.56
0.26
0.34
0.00
212.28
0.76
212.62
0.76
6.71
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.02
0.02
USFWS
4.71
20679.26
74.18
20679.26
74.18
159
3005.76
10.78
6.59
3005.76
10.78
11.30
0.02
USNPS
Total
47.81
0.17
191.84
0.69
177.81
0.64
273.31
0.98
93.56
0.34
6516.64 23.38
0.04 319.18
1.14
27876.56 100.00
0.02
20894.77 74.95
DRAFT 02/01/05
abpae33010
Yellow-bellied flycatcher
MiDNR
Status 1
23.94
0.28
Status 2
45.07
0.53
Status 3
2193.67
25.59
Status 4
Total
1.40
0.02
2264.08
26.41
abpae33020
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
30.49
0.39
Status 3
455.06
5.77
Status 4
0.00
0.00
485.55
6.16
abpae33030
Status 1
16.95
0.42
Status 2
25.34
0.63
Status 3
854.59
21.38
Total
0.70
0.02
897.58
22.46
abpae33040
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
50.54
0.41
Status 3
823.54
6.70
Status 4
0.00
0.00
874.08
7.11
abpae33070
Status 1
221.42
0.48
Status 2
158.88
0.34
Status 3
6502.13
14.10
Total
7.76
0.02
6890.19
14.94
abpae35020
Status 1
161.68
0.35
Status 2
156.16
0.34
Status 3
5459.57
11.75
Total
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.98
0.02
78.50
0.92
80.48
0.94
15.61
USFWS
0.18
31.37
4640.44
54.13
4640.44
54.13
1427.15
16.65
0.00
1427.15
16.65
31.37
0.37
USNPS
Total
87.50
1.02
158.42
1.85
11.79
0.14
56.86
0.66
13.91
0.16
3636.71 42.42
0.37 113.20
1.32
8572.33 100.00
0.00
4720.34 55.06
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
7.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
77.61
0.98
77.61
0.98
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.09
38.98
7.07
0.09
7263.37
92.15
7263.37
92.15
0.49
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.07
0.09
0.00
0.00
30.49
0.39
0.00
0.00
503.80
6.39
9.76
0.00
0.12
Total
7340.98 93.13
38.98
0.49
9.76
0.12
0.00
0.00
7882.34 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
2.73
3.01
0.08
3.01
0.08
0.15
0.00
55.88
1.40
56.03
1.40
2.73
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.07
0.07
80.97
2601.14
65.09
2601.14
65.09
2.03
USNPS
Total
3.35
0.08
104.00
2.60
3.65
0.09
28.99
0.73
343.33
8.59
3.24
0.08
1.47
0.04
1205.79 30.17
343.33
8.59
84.21
2.11
8.47
0.21
3996.50 100.00
2657.72 66.50
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
5.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
130.79
1.06
130.79
1.06
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.04
196.98
5.21
0.04
11073.91
90.10
11073.91
90.10
1.60
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.21
0.04
0.00
0.00
50.54
0.41
0.00
0.00
1030.28
8.38
9.76
0.00
0.08
Total
11204.70 91.16
196.98
1.60
9.76
0.08
0.00
0.00
12290.73 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
11.95
133.01
0.29
133.01
0.29
0.79
0.00
411.65
0.89
412.44
0.89
11.95
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.03
0.03
12.55
32411.23
70.29
32411.23
70.29
USNPS
Total
0.03 332.11
0.72
578.03
1.25
221.11
0.48
379.99
0.82
5579.18
12.10
7.72
0.02 102.27
0.22
12325.10 26.73
5579.18
12.10
20.27
0.04 655.49
1.42
46113.76 100.00
32830.64 71.19
Eastern phoebe
MiDNR
Status 4
0.00
USFS
0.18
Least flycatcher
MiDNR
Status 4
15.61
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Willow flycatcher
MiDNR
Total
Nature
Conservancy
Alder flycatcher
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Acadian flycatcher
MiDNR
Total
MiMilitary
3.38
0.01
5780.79
12.44
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
16.24
123.72
0.27
123.72
0.27
0.91
0.00
454.25
0.98
455.16
0.98
16.24
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.03
0.03
12.55
35325.46
76.04
35325.46
76.04
160
USNPS
Total
0.03 118.90
0.26
309.37
0.67
225.81
0.49
381.97
0.82
4288.55
9.23
10.76
0.02 100.94
0.22
9984.45 21.49
4288.55
9.23
23.31
0.05 445.65
0.96
46458.88 100.00
35783.09 77.02
DRAFT 02/01/05
abpae43070
Great crested flycatcher
MiDNR
Status 1
159.76
0.46
Status 2
113.90
0.33
Status 3
4543.99
13.09
Status 4
Total
2.51
0.01
4820.16
13.89
abpae52060
Status 1
31.30
0.18
Status 2
73.91
0.43
Status 3
2361.13
13.65
Total
1.99
0.01
2468.33
14.27
abpat02010
Status 1
0.28
0.00
Status 2
73.11
0.15
Status 3
1157.49
2.40
Status 4
1.85
0.00
1232.73
2.55
abpau01010
Status 1
0.01
0.00
Status 2
2.94
0.12
Status 3
11.97
0.48
Status 4
0.07
0.00
14.99
0.60
abpau03010
Status 1
16.90
0.04
Status 2
103.70
0.27
Status 3
2500.91
6.53
Status 4
2.56
0.01
2624.07
6.85
abpau07010
0.14
47.08
0.14
0.89
0.00
340.52
0.98
341.41
0.98
14.94
USFWS
0.04
7.15
25116.68
72.36
25116.68
72.36
3953.50
11.39
9.76
3953.50
11.39
16.91
0.02
USNPS
Total
99.62
0.29
281.47
0.81
201.20
0.58
315.10
0.91
99.40
0.29
8654.62 24.93
0.05 400.22
1.15
34710.90 100.00
0.03
25459.71 73.35
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
6.16
80.87
0.47
80.87
0.47
0.23
0.00
190.59
1.10
190.82
1.10
6.16
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.04
0.04
97.69
13504.07
78.04
13504.07
78.04
0.56
USNPS
Total
5.95
0.03
141.10
0.82
29.42
0.17
103.33
0.60
906.45
5.24
5.88
0.03
7.41
0.04
3361.97 19.43
906.45
5.24 103.57
0.60
42.78
0.25
17303.05 100.00
13696.65 79.16
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
4.11
78.70
78.70
0.16
0.16
0.11
0.00
228.39
0.47
228.50
0.47
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.01
328.96
4.11
0.01
46347.92
96.05
46347.92
96.05
0.68
USFWS
USNPS
0.28
0.00
0.00
4.67
0.01
21.07
0.04
94.18
0.20
0.00
0.00
1575.21
3.26
9.95
0.00
0.02
Total
46578.16 96.53
328.96
0.68
10.23
0.02
21.07
0.04
48252.22 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.11
0.06
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
15.67
0.62
15.67
0.62
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.00
1.56
0.11
0.00
2480.32
98.69
2480.32
98.69
0.06
USFWS
USNPS
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.01
0.02
0.00
2.96
0.12
0.01
0.00
14.13
0.56
0.53
0.00
0.02
Total
2496.06 99.31
1.56
0.06
0.55
0.02
0.03
0.00
2513.29 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
11.84
81.86
81.86
0.21
0.21
0.23
0.00
275.59
0.72
275.82
0.72
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
190.61
830.57
11.84
USFWS
0.03
0.03
34231.65
89.34
34231.65
89.34
2.17
14.59
0.50
0.04
USNPS
Total
21.86
0.06
241.21
0.63
28.97
0.08
132.67
0.35
2.98
0.01
3431.14
8.96
34509.80 90.07
830.57
2.17 205.20
0.54
53.81
0.14
38314.82 100.00
Northern rough-winged swallow
MiDNR
Status 1
0.01
0.00
Status 2
2.94
0.12
Status 3
11.97
0.48
Status 4
0.07
0.00
14.99
0.60
Total
47.08
USFS
0.04
Tree swallow
MiDNR
Total
14.94
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Purple martin
MiDNR
Total
Nature
Conservancy
Horned lark
MiDNR
Total
MiOther
Eastern kingbird
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.11
0.06
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
15.67
0.62
15.67
0.62
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.00
1.56
0.11
0.00
2480.32
98.69
2480.32
98.69
161
0.06
USFWS
USNPS
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.01
0.02
0.00
2.96
0.12
0.01
0.00
14.13
0.56
0.53
0.00
0.02
Total
2496.06 99.31
1.56
0.06
0.55
0.02
0.03
0.00
2513.29 100.00
DRAFT 02/01/05
abpau08010
Bank swallow
MiDNR
Status 1
1.68
0.04
Status 2
11.02
0.29
Status 3
215.86
5.66
Status 4
0.35
0.01
228.91
6.00
Total
abpau09010
Status 1
0.01
0.00
Status 2
2.94
0.12
Status 3
11.32
0.46
Status 4
0.07
0.00
14.34
0.58
abpau09030
Status 1
16.94
0.03
Status 2
117.87
0.21
Status 3
2593.99
4.58
Status 4
2.91
0.01
2731.71
4.82
abpav01010
Status 1
68.48
0.42
Status 2
67.69
0.42
Status 3
3431.29
21.18
Total
1.67
0.01
3569.13
22.04
abpav02020
Status 1
232.03
0.35
Status 2
235.50
0.36
Status 3
9543.27
14.57
Total
9.66
0.01
10020.46
15.30
abpav10010
Status 1
241.22
0.22
Status 2
286.85
0.26
Status 3 10880.31
9.97
Total
1.26
0.03
0.03
0.07
0.00
39.85
1.05
39.92
1.05
82.54
1.92
USFWS
18.51
0.05
3435.31
90.10
3435.31
90.10
2.16
2.36
0.49
0.06
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
22.11
0.58
1.42
0.04
12.44
0.33
0.47
0.01
302.56
7.94
3475.51 91.16
82.54
2.16
20.87
0.55
1.89
0.05
3812.62 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.11
0.06
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
14.37
0.58
14.37
0.58
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.00
1.56
0.11
0.00
2438.39
98.77
2438.39
98.77
0.06
USFWS
USNPS
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.01
0.02
0.00
2.96
0.12
0.01
0.00
12.95
0.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
2452.83 99.35
1.56
0.06
0.02
0.00
0.03
0.00
2468.88 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
12.94
82.77
82.77
0.15
0.15
0.23
0.00
345.78
0.61
346.01
0.61
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
190.63
844.66
12.94
USFWS
0.02
0.02
52390.46
92.45
52390.46
92.45
1.49
17.67
0.34
0.03
USNPS
Total
21.86
0.04
242.37
0.43
29.89
0.05
147.76
0.26
3.04
0.01
3542.36
6.25
52739.15 93.06
844.66
1.49 208.30
0.37
54.79
0.10
56671.64 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
25.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.20
0.01
182.86
1.13
185.06
1.14
25.49
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.16
0.16
64.55
8589.69
53.03
8589.69
53.03
3484.05
21.51
0.00
3484.05
21.51
64.55
USNPS
Total
0.40 222.34
1.37
380.86
2.35
27.24
0.17
94.93
0.59
29.96
0.18
6947.50 42.89
0.40 279.54
1.73
16197.51 100.00
0.00
8774.22 54.17
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
20.94
249.42
0.38
249.42
0.38
0.95
0.00
612.08
0.93
613.03
0.94
20.94
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.03
0.03
57.36
45888.60
70.05
45888.60
70.05
USNPS
Total
0.09 345.02
0.53
655.35
1.00
260.97
0.40
496.47
0.76
7924.34
12.10
10.27
0.02 115.51
0.18
17843.76 27.24
7924.34
12.10
67.63
0.10 721.50
1.10
65505.92 100.00
46510.34 71.00
American crow
MiDNR
Status 4
1.26
USFS
0.05
Blue jay
MiDNR
Status 4
1.92
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Gray jay
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Barn swallow
MiDNR
Total
MiOther
Cliff swallow
MiDNR
Total
MiMilitary
11.28
0.01
11419.66
10.46
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
27.68
269.92
0.25
269.92
0.25
1.10
0.00
819.19
0.75
820.29
0.75
27.68
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.03
0.03
64.84
87068.48
79.76
87068.48
79.76
162
USNPS
Total
0.06 417.88
0.38
751.62
0.69
274.91
0.25
561.76
0.51
8648.92
7.92
18.51
0.02 129.14
0.12
19947.90 18.27
8648.92
7.92
83.35
0.08 821.93
0.75 109160.23 100.00
87898.95 80.52
DRAFT 02/01/05
abpav10110
Common raven
MiDNR
Status 1
306.66
0.45
Status 2
283.01
0.41
Status 3 14125.01
20.53
Status 4
Total
15.65
0.02
14730.33
21.41
abpaw01010
Status 1
260.92
0.35
Status 2
297.96
0.40
Status 3 12361.20
16.72
Total
13.07
0.02
12933.15
17.50
abpaw01060
Status 1
42.19
0.35
Status 2
54.97
0.46
Status 3
3048.56
25.53
Total
1.60
0.01
3147.32
26.35
abpaw01110
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
142.89
0.43
Status 3
5109.65
15.43
Total
9.02
0.03
5261.56
15.89
abpaz01010
Status 1
191.62
0.45
Status 2
177.82
0.42
Status 3
6946.47
16.45
Total
5.98
0.01
7321.89
17.34
abpaz01020
Status 1
162.12
0.45
Status 2
123.86
0.35
Status 3
4511.43
12.64
Total
0.42
286.43
0.42
3.03
0.00
715.68
1.04
718.71
1.04
10678.04
39.34
USFWS
351.55
0.06
41030.87
59.63
41030.87
59.63 10678.04
USNPS
Total
0.51 529.23
0.77
1226.78
1.78
299.91
0.44
582.92
0.85
0.00
0.00 146.17
0.21
25238.68 36.68
15.52 351.55
0.51 975.31
1.42
68810.58 100.00
15.52
41762.20 60.69
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
42.82
186.55
0.25
186.55
0.25
3.00
0.00
729.26
0.99
732.26
0.99
42.82
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.06
0.06
75.81
49273.43
66.66
49273.43
66.66
USNPS
Total
0.10 489.42
0.66
868.97
1.18
268.56
0.36
566.52
0.77
9765.24
13.21
14.69
0.02 134.10
0.18
22464.78 30.39
9765.24
13.21
90.50
0.12 892.08
1.21
73916.03 100.00
50015.76 67.67
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
19.34
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.00
127.10
1.06
127.25
1.07
19.34
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.16
0.16
70.82
5973.36
50.02
5973.36
50.02
2381.44
19.94
0.00
2381.44
19.94
70.82
USNPS
Total
0.59 165.44
1.39
297.79
2.49
26.45
0.22
81.42
0.68
31.70
0.27
5461.85 45.73
0.59 223.59
1.87
11943.12 100.00
0.00
6102.06 51.09
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
8.90
144.93
0.44
144.93
0.44
0.21
0.00
310.33
0.94
310.54
0.94
8.90
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.03
0.03
25083.49
75.73
25083.49
75.73
USFWS
USNPS
0.41
0.00
0.00
9.31
0.03
120.30
0.36
263.19
0.79
0.00
Total
2177.81
6.58
14.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
7446.60 22.48
2177.81
6.58
14.41
0.04 120.30
0.36
33121.94 100.00
25402.84 76.69
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
28.97
58.30
0.14
58.30
0.14
2.50
0.01
410.31
0.97
412.81
0.98
28.97
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.07
0.07
USFWS
40.51
27941.36
66.16
27941.36
66.16
USNPS
Total
0.10 251.42
0.60
512.52
1.21
222.44
0.53
400.26
0.95
5836.69
13.82
6.29
0.01 115.04
0.27
12965.29 30.70
5836.69
13.82
46.80
0.11 588.90
1.39
42235.72 100.00
28357.65 67.14
White-breasted nuthatch
MiDNR
Status 4
286.43
USFS
0.06
Red-breasted nuthatch
MiDNR
Status 4
39.34
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Tufted titmouse
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Boreal chickadee
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Black-capped chickadee
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
4.11
0.01
4801.52
13.46
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
9.57
101.44
0.28
101.44
0.28
0.59
0.00
308.63
0.86
309.22
0.87
9.57
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.03
0.03
USFWS
6.50
25686.17
71.98
25686.17
71.98
163
4357.33
12.21
6.72
4357.33
12.21
13.22
USNPS
Total
0.02 111.69
0.31
289.88
0.81
197.12
0.55
320.98
0.90
96.23
0.27
9073.74 25.43
0.04 405.04
1.14
35683.51 100.00
0.02
25998.91 72.86
DRAFT 02/01/05
abpba01010
Brown creeper
MiDNR
Status 1
260.92
0.36
Status 2
297.96
0.41
Status 3 12348.02
16.84
Status 4
Total
13.07
0.02
12919.97
17.62
abpbg06130
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
33.40
0.36
Status 3
412.01
4.43
Status 4
0.00
0.00
445.41
4.79
abpbg09010
Status 1
31.36
0.22
Status 2
54.82
0.39
Status 3
2203.40
15.76
Total
1.76
0.01
2291.34
16.39
abpbg09050
Status 1
189.28
0.54
Status 2
142.54
0.41
Status 3
6286.14
17.93
Total
5.52
0.02
6623.48
18.89
abpbg10010
Status 1
0.92
0.00
Status 2
42.22
0.21
Status 3
647.74
3.25
Status 4
1.29
0.01
692.17
3.48
abpbg10020
Status 1
0.08
0.00
Status 2
19.46
0.57
Status 3
861.74
25.07
Total
0.25
186.55
0.25
3.00
0.00
728.01
0.99
731.01
1.00
41.75
USFWS
0.06
75.81
48695.60
66.41
48695.60
66.41
USNPS
Total
0.10 489.42
0.67
867.90
1.18
268.56
0.37
566.52
0.77
9765.24
13.32
14.69
0.02 134.10
0.18
22451.60 30.62
9765.24
13.32
90.50
0.12 892.08
1.22
73322.70 100.00
49436.68 67.42
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
9.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
73.19
0.79
73.19
0.79
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.10
8.76
9.13
0.10
8760.02
94.23
8760.02
94.23
0.09
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.13
0.10
0.00
0.00
33.40
0.36
0.00
0.00
420.77
4.53
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
8833.21 95.02
8.76
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9296.51 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
5.64
25.00
0.18
25.00
0.18
0.22
0.00
159.08
1.14
159.30
1.14
5.64
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.04
0.04
97.73
10565.12
75.59
10565.12
75.59
0.70
USNPS
Total
23.15
0.17
157.88
1.13
15.71
0.11
70.53
0.50
774.53
5.54
4.88
0.03
14.56
0.10
3022.59 21.63
774.53
5.54 102.61
0.73
53.42
0.38
13976.96 100.00
10725.96 76.74
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
25.23
55.20
0.16
55.20
0.16
2.57
0.01
348.61
0.99
351.18
1.00
25.23
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.07
0.07
38.21
21810.17
62.22
21810.17
62.22
USNPS
Total
0.11 252.39
0.72
505.11
1.44
212.51
0.61
355.05
1.01
5577.18
15.91
0.00
0.00 109.82
0.31
12030.91 34.32
5577.18
15.91
38.21
0.11 574.72
1.64
35055.37 100.00
22164.30 63.23
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
1.71
3.24
3.24
0.02
0.02
0.09
0.00
142.86
0.72
142.95
0.72
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.01
166.89
1.71
0.01
18870.15
94.82
18870.15
94.82
0.84
USFWS
USNPS
5.71
1.02
0.01
9.36
0.05
11.66
0.06
53.88
0.27
0.00
0.00
822.86
4.13
4.90
0.03
0.02
Total
19014.30 95.55
166.89
0.84
10.61
0.05
12.68
0.06
19900.40 100.00
Marsh wren
MiDNR
Status 4
186.55
USFS
0.06
Sedge wren
MiDNR
Total
41.75
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Winter wren
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
House wren
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Carolina wren
MiDNR
Total
MiMilitary
0.66
0.02
881.94
25.66
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
5.95
2.94
0.09
2.94
0.09
0.04
0.00
44.52
1.30
44.56
1.30
5.95
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.17
0.17
180.98
2027.11
58.97
2027.11
58.97
164
5.26
USNPS
Total
5.65
0.16
192.66
5.60
1.34
0.04
20.80
0.61
281.94
8.20
5.14
0.15
0.04
0.00
1151.84 33.51
281.94
8.20 186.12
5.41
7.03
0.20
3437.59 100.00
2072.29 60.28
DRAFT 02/01/05
abpbj05010
Golden-crowned kinglet
MiDNR
Status 1
69.54
0.26
Status 2
140.54
0.52
Status 3
6019.48
22.19
Status 4
Total
5.68
0.02
6235.24
22.98
abpbj05020
Status 1
16.59
0.26
Status 2
27.55
0.44
Status 3
1740.43
27.58
Total
0.04
0.00
1784.61
28.28
abpbj08010
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
94.99
0.42
Status 3
2631.30
11.50
Total
4.36
0.02
2730.65
11.94
abpbj15010
Status 1
2.19
0.01
Status 2
75.69
0.21
Status 3
1955.41
5.39
Status 4
1.79
0.00
2035.08
5.61
abpbj18080
Status 1
219.19
0.45
Status 2
163.48
0.33
Status 3
6832.58
13.93
Total
6.40
0.01
7221.65
14.72
abpbj18100
Status 1
24.36
0.23
Status 2
51.47
0.49
Status 3
2755.98
26.02
Total
0.30
81.50
0.30
2.30
0.01
319.09
1.18
321.39
1.18
29.41
USFWS
0.11
71.57
14771.01
54.44
14771.01
54.44
5316.26
19.59
0.00
5316.26
19.59
71.57
USNPS
Total
0.26 226.77
0.84
397.29
1.46
48.89
0.18
189.43
0.70
29.92
0.11
11449.46 42.20
0.26 305.58
1.13
27131.96 100.00
0.00
15095.78 55.64
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
13.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.59
0.03
50.82
0.81
52.41
0.83
13.02
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.21
0.21
17.79
3456.54
54.78
3456.54
54.78
0.28
USNPS
Total
53.73
0.85
101.13
1.60
8.53
0.14
36.08
0.57
911.53
14.45
0.00
0.00
11.93
0.19
2665.48 42.24
911.53
14.45
17.79
0.28
74.19
1.18
6310.09 100.00
3507.40 55.58
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
8.34
104.89
0.46
104.89
0.46
0.00
0.00
208.86
0.91
208.86
0.91
8.34
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.04
0.04
18153.43
79.37
18153.43
79.37
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.34
0.04
105.57
0.46
200.56
0.88
0.00
Total
1547.78
6.77
13.13
0.06
0.00
0.00
4297.10 18.79
1547.78
6.77
13.13
0.06 105.57
0.46
22872.65 100.00
18366.65 80.30
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
3.73
96.66
96.66
0.27
0.27
0.09
0.00
238.29
0.66
238.38
0.66
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
11.24
588.92
3.73
USFWS
0.01
0.01
33209.93
91.61
33209.93
91.61
1.62
6.43
0.03
0.02
USNPS
Total
20.00
0.06
37.16
0.10
32.52
0.09
108.21
0.30
9.36
0.03
2656.87
7.33
33450.01 92.27
588.92
1.62
17.67
0.05
61.88
0.17
36252.25 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
18.62
80.36
0.16
80.36
0.16
1.11
0.00
470.04
0.96
471.15
0.96
18.62
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.04
0.04
USFWS
13.88
35264.25
71.90
35264.25
71.90
USNPS
Total
0.03 320.55
0.65
572.24
1.17
230.15
0.47
393.63
0.80
5302.83
10.81
14.40
0.03 106.96
0.22
12338.24 25.16
5302.83
10.81
28.28
0.06 657.66
1.34
49044.80 100.00
35740.69 72.87
Swainson's thrush
MiDNR
Status 4
81.50
USFS
0.11
Veery
MiDNR
Status 4
29.41
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Eastern bluebird
MiDNR
Total
Nature
Conservancy
Blue-gray gnatcatcher
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Ruby-crowned kinglet
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
3.60
0.03
2835.41
26.77
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
16.18
14.43
0.14
14.43
0.14
1.99
0.02
110.74
1.05
112.73
1.06
16.18
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.15
0.15
USFWS
32.67
5891.83
55.62
5891.83
55.62
165
1553.43
14.67
0.00
1553.43
14.67
32.67
USNPS
Total
0.31 100.28
0.95
173.49
1.64
21.10
0.20
72.57
0.69
14.14
0.13
4339.97 40.97
0.31 135.52
1.28
10592.20 100.00
0.00
6006.17 56.70
DRAFT 02/01/05
abpbj18110
Hermit thrush
MiDNR
Status 1
47.22
0.27
Status 2
69.86
0.40
Status 3
3479.54
20.11
Status 4
Total
2.51
0.01
3599.13
20.80
abpbj19010
Status 1
163.47
0.36
Status 2
162.87
0.36
Status 3
5934.47
13.02
Total
4.88
0.01
6265.69
13.74
abpbj20170
Status 1
224.99
0.24
Status 2
280.64
0.30
Status 3
9880.88
10.39
Total
10.43
0.01
10396.94
10.93
abpbk01010
Status 1
236.86
0.40
Status 2
221.29
0.37
Status 3
9249.81
15.64
Total
9.63
0.02
9717.59
16.43
abpbk03010
Status 1
0.01
0.00
Status 2
42.42
0.17
Status 3
677.51
2.70
Status 4
1.28
0.01
721.22
2.88
abpbk06010
Status 1
223.61
0.37
Status 2
207.92
0.34
Status 3
8351.91
13.68
Total
0.39
67.50
0.39
0.43
0.00
213.45
1.23
213.88
1.24
13.48
USFWS
0.08
42.47
9339.93
53.99
9339.93
53.99
3832.75
22.15
0.00
3832.75
22.15
42.47
USNPS
Total
0.25 129.83
0.75
233.00
1.35
40.34
0.23
110.20
0.64
20.56
0.12
7400.78 42.78
0.25 190.73
1.10
17299.87 100.00
0.00
9555.89 55.24
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
17.04
107.12
0.23
107.12
0.23
0.96
0.00
429.86
0.94
430.82
0.95
17.04
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.04
0.04
8.99
33495.98
73.48
33495.98
73.48
USNPS
Total
0.02 129.65
0.28
319.15
0.70
207.73
0.46
370.60
0.81
4806.26
10.54
14.51
0.03 101.92
0.22
10965.24 24.05
4806.26
10.54
23.50
0.05 439.30
0.96
45585.71 100.00
33930.72 74.43
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
23.17
235.90
0.25
235.90
0.25
1.24
0.00
798.58
0.84
799.82
0.84
23.17
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.02
0.02
26.30
76217.88
80.15
76217.88
80.15
USNPS
Total
0.03 370.03
0.39
644.49
0.68
265.30
0.28
545.94
0.57
6624.46
6.97
22.57
0.02 117.39
0.12
16882.44 17.75
6624.46
6.97
48.87
0.05 752.72
0.79
95099.76 100.00
77026.89 81.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
22.85
134.89
0.23
134.89
0.23
1.22
0.00
556.16
0.94
557.38
0.94
22.85
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.04
0.04
272.03
42210.26
71.36
42210.26
71.36
USNPS
Total
0.46 304.36
0.51
836.10
1.41
226.61
0.38
447.90
0.76
5563.03
9.41
18.45
0.03 119.84
0.20
15087.24 25.51
5563.03
9.41 290.48
0.49 650.81
1.10
59147.29 100.00
42776.05 72.32
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
1.97
17.74
17.74
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.00
125.86
0.50
125.93
0.50
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.01
158.40
1.97
0.01
24016.33
95.83
24016.33
95.83
0.63
USFWS
USNPS
0.49
0.00
0.00
2.47
0.01
10.14
0.04
52.56
0.21
8.36
0.03
862.08
3.44
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
24143.47 96.34
158.40
0.63
0.49
0.00
18.50
0.07
25060.58 100.00
Brown thrasher
MiDNR
Status 4
67.50
USFS
0.08
Northern mockingbird
MiDNR
Total
13.48
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Gray catbird
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
American robin
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Wood thrush
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
8.68
0.01
8792.12
14.40
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
14.56
229.33
0.38
229.33
0.38
0.84
0.00
561.93
0.92
562.77
0.92
14.56
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.02
0.02
USFWS
23.36
44560.88
72.97
44560.88
72.97
166
USNPS
Total
0.04 352.11
0.58
613.64
1.00
251.86
0.41
459.78
0.75
6156.09
10.08
9.82
0.02 111.63
0.18
14859.62 24.33
6156.09
10.08
33.18
0.05 715.60
1.17
61064.53 100.00
45131.49 73.91
DRAFT 02/01/05
abpbn01020
Cedar waxwing
MiDNR
Status 1
224.25
0.32
Status 2
242.81
0.35
Status 3
9638.90
13.73
Status 4
Total
9.33
0.01
10115.29
14.41
abpbr01030
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
11.35
0.13
Status 3
398.73
4.49
Status 4
0.12
0.00
410.20
4.62
abpbw01020
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
15.84
0.33
Status 3
213.67
4.46
Status 4
0.00
0.00
229.51
4.79
abpbw01160
Status 1
47.22
0.26
Status 2
71.67
0.40
Status 3
3521.98
19.56
Total
2.51
0.01
3643.38
20.23
abpbw01170
Status 1
127.60
0.36
Status 2
118.93
0.34
Status 3
4419.84
12.52
Total
3.82
0.01
4670.19
13.23
abpbw01210
Status 1
194.74
0.31
Status 2
214.71
0.34
Status 3
8469.12
13.56
Total
0.33
234.36
0.33
1.19
0.00
674.75
0.96
675.94
0.96
21.50
USFWS
0.03
24.75
51843.53
73.84
51843.53
73.84
USNPS
Total
0.04 352.12
0.50
622.62
0.89
261.08
0.37
503.89
0.72
6548.40
9.33
17.56
0.03 116.91
0.17
16557.32 23.58
6548.40
9.33
42.31
0.06 730.11
1.04
70211.44 100.00
52527.61 74.81
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
1.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
73.35
0.83
73.35
0.83
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.01
125.63
1.09
0.01
8259.95
92.98
8259.95
92.98
1.41
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.09
0.01
13.60
0.15
24.95
0.28
0.00
0.00
524.36
5.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
8333.42 93.80
125.63
1.41
0.00
0.00
13.60
0.15
8883.82 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
7.48
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
51.34
1.07
51.34
1.07
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.16
93.30
7.48
0.16
4407.40
92.03
4407.40
92.03
1.95
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.48
0.16
0.00
0.00
15.84
0.33
0.00
0.00
306.97
6.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
4458.74 93.10
93.30
1.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4789.03 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
13.55
67.50
0.37
67.50
0.37
0.43
0.00
218.17
1.21
218.60
1.21
13.55
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.08
0.08
42.47
9999.94
55.53
9999.94
55.53
3832.75
21.28
0.00
3832.75
21.28
42.47
USNPS
Total
0.24 129.83
0.72
233.07
1.29
40.34
0.22
112.01
0.62
20.56
0.11
7443.22 41.33
0.24 190.73
1.06
18008.92 100.00
0.00
10220.62 56.75
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
13.07
78.80
0.22
78.80
0.22
0.68
0.00
324.66
0.92
325.34
0.92
13.07
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.04
0.04
26995.48
76.48
26995.48
76.48
USFWS
USNPS
1.90
0.00
0.00
142.57
0.40
123.13
0.35
242.06
0.69
0.01
Total
3076.34
8.72
14.38
0.04
0.00
0.00
7590.04 21.50
3076.34
8.72
16.28
0.05 123.13
0.35
35298.63 100.00
27323.96 77.41
Warbling vireo
MiDNR
Status 4
234.36
USFS
0.03
Yellow-throated vireo
MiDNR
Status 4
21.50
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Blue-headed vireo
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
White-eyed vireo
MiDNR
Total
MiOther
Loggerhead shrike
MiDNR
Total
MiMilitary
8.45
0.01
8887.02
14.23
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
18.65
206.52
0.33
206.52
0.33
0.94
0.00
578.86
0.93
579.80
0.93
18.65
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.03
0.03
22.96
46867.33
75.06
46867.33
75.06
167
USNPS
Total
0.04 288.25
0.46
524.60
0.84
241.83
0.39
456.54
0.73
5198.97
8.33
17.43
0.03 114.23
0.18
14007.21 22.43
5198.97
8.33
40.39
0.06 644.31
1.03
62442.99 100.00
47454.64 76.00
DRAFT 02/01/05
abpbw01230
Philadelphia vireo
MiDNR
Status 1
182.20
0.92
Status 2
54.26
0.27
Status 3
3270.57
16.51
Status 4
Total
0.72
0.00
3507.75
17.70
abpbw01240
Status 1
133.25
0.35
Status 2
131.52
0.35
Status 3
4680.52
12.47
Total
3.89
0.01
4949.18
13.18
abpbx01020
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
45.62
0.35
Status 3
1335.10
10.17
Total
0.79
0.01
1381.51
10.53
abpbx01030
Status 1
32.29
0.16
Status 2
83.49
0.40
Status 3
3149.19
15.12
Total
2.25
0.01
3267.22
15.68
abpbx01040
Status 1
24.67
0.24
Status 2
54.46
0.52
Status 3
2531.96
24.34
Total
3.86
0.04
2614.95
25.14
abpbx01060
Status 1
292.48
0.38
Status 2
318.20
0.41
Status 3 13590.26
17.69
Total
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.69
0.00
194.02
0.98
194.71
0.98
6.63
USFWS
0.03
17.08
12748.96
64.34
12748.96
64.34
USNPS
Total
0.09 275.16
1.39
481.07
2.43
71.13
0.36
125.39
0.63
2879.96
14.54
0.00
0.00 112.46
0.57
6263.68 31.61
2879.96
14.54
17.08
0.09 458.75
2.32
19813.84 100.00
12943.70 65.33
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
13.78
78.80
0.21
78.80
0.21
0.69
0.00
330.29
0.88
330.98
0.88
13.78
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.04
0.04
6.10
28404.15
75.67
28404.15
75.67
0.02
USNPS
Total
47.86
0.13
200.99
0.54
187.14
0.50
318.66
0.85
3405.04
9.07
14.90
0.04
98.83
0.26
8278.78 22.06
3405.04
9.07
21.00
0.06 333.83
0.89
37536.76 100.00
28738.33 76.56
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
3.75
12.04
0.09
12.04
0.09
0.00
0.00
141.30
1.08
141.30
1.08
3.75
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.03
0.03
11335.79
86.39
11335.79
86.39
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.75
0.03
15.11
0.12
60.73
0.46
0.00
Total
226.22
1.72
6.08
0.05
0.00
0.00
1579.44 12.04
226.22
1.72
6.08
0.05
15.11
0.12
13121.80 100.00
11477.88 87.47
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
6.39
100.38
0.48
100.38
0.48
0.25
0.00
228.20
1.10
228.45
1.10
6.39
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.03
0.03
103.10
15927.65
76.46
15927.65
76.46
0.49
USNPS
Total
24.55
0.12
166.33
0.80
37.10
0.18
120.59
0.58
1114.77
5.35
6.08
0.03
15.63
0.08
4386.30 21.06
1114.77
5.35 109.18
0.52
77.28
0.37
20831.32 100.00
16158.10 77.57
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
16.22
16.02
0.15
16.02
0.15
2.23
0.02
101.31
0.97
103.54
1.00
16.22
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.16
0.16
USFWS
31.37
5933.92
57.05
5933.92
57.05
1566.09
15.06
0.00
1566.09
15.06
31.37
0.30
USNPS
Total
87.50
0.84
159.76
1.54
13.24
0.13
67.70
0.65
18.23
0.18
4134.53 39.75
0.30 118.97
1.14
10401.08 100.00
0.00
6039.09 58.06
Nashville warbler
MiDNR
Status 4
0.00
USFS
0.03
Tennessee warbler
MiDNR
Status 4
6.63
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Golden-winged warbler
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Blue-winged warbler
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Red-eyed vireo
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
14.70
0.02
14215.64
18.50
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
39.66
191.51
0.25
191.51
0.25
3.28
0.00
783.98
1.02
787.26
1.02
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.05
10382.14
39.66
0.05
USFWS
173.43
50125.40
65.24
50125.40
65.24 10382.14
168
USNPS
Total
0.23 495.06
0.64
1000.63
1.30
274.88
0.36
593.08
0.77
0.00
0.00 141.52
0.18
24308.71 31.64
13.51 173.43
0.23 911.46
1.19
76826.50 100.00
13.51
50924.08 66.28
DRAFT 02/01/05
abpbx02010
Northern parula
MiDNR
Status 1
28.73
0.27
Status 2
64.99
0.62
Status 3
2581.63
24.44
Status 4
Total
3.33
0.03
2678.68
25.36
abpbx03010
Status 1
32.63
0.16
Status 2
82.99
0.42
Status 3
3474.70
17.52
Total
2.41
0.01
3592.73
18.11
abpbx03020
Status 1
224.95
0.32
Status 2
246.43
0.35
Status 3
9735.88
13.80
Total
9.45
0.01
10216.71
14.49
abpbx03030
Status 1
37.87
0.42
Status 2
30.87
0.34
Status 3
1499.23
16.75
Total
1.15
0.01
1569.12
17.53
abpbx03040
Status 1
62.23
0.33
Status 2
82.17
0.44
Status 3
4438.81
23.52
Total
4.87
0.03
4588.08
24.31
abpbx03050
Status 1
158.36
0.72
Status 2
64.75
0.29
Status 3
3150.70
14.28
Total
0.09
9.55
0.09
1.75
0.02
124.90
1.18
126.65
1.20
17.52
USFWS
0.17
22.48
5780.31
54.71
5780.31
54.71
1766.67
16.72
0.00
1766.67
16.72
22.48
USNPS
Total
0.21 127.87
1.21
196.60
1.86
20.73
0.20
85.72
0.81
14.11
0.13
4373.71 41.40
0.21 162.71
1.54
10564.57 100.00
0.00
5908.54 55.93
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
11.96
29.33
0.15
29.33
0.15
0.57
0.00
234.18
1.18
234.75
1.18
11.96
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.06
0.06
99.29
14588.95
73.55
14588.95
73.55
0.50
USNPS
Total
41.12
0.21
185.00
0.93
24.92
0.13
107.91
0.54
1181.12
5.95
11.04
0.06
20.13
0.10
4716.89 23.78
1181.12
5.95 110.33
0.56
86.17
0.43
19835.34 100.00
14825.54 74.74
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
20.83
234.84
0.33
234.84
0.33
1.21
0.00
679.16
0.96
680.37
0.96
20.83
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.03
0.03
25.86
51979.83
73.70
51979.83
73.70
USNPS
Total
0.04 370.03
0.52
641.67
0.91
262.42
0.37
508.85
0.72
6600.19
9.36
17.56
0.02 117.33
0.17
16707.01 23.69
6600.19
9.36
43.42
0.06 749.78
1.06
70525.97 100.00
52668.44 74.68
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
6.18
27.90
0.31
27.90
0.31
0.32
0.00
122.04
1.36
122.36
1.37
6.18
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.07
0.07
USFWS
3.23
5288.56
59.08
5288.56
59.08
USNPS
Total
0.04 118.36
1.32
165.64
1.85
24.01
0.27
54.88
0.61
1782.94
19.92
0.00
0.00
8.28
0.09
3318.67 37.08
1782.94
19.92
3.23
0.04 150.65
1.68
8950.94 100.00
5411.75 60.46
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
22.06
42.17
0.22
42.17
0.22
2.32
0.01
222.30
1.18
224.62
1.19
22.06
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.12
0.12
USFWS
35.90
10728.34
56.84
10728.34
56.84
2968.80
15.73
0.00
2968.80
15.73
35.90
USNPS
Total
0.19 217.14
1.15
337.33
1.79
23.86
0.13
106.03
0.56
22.42
0.12
7474.52 39.60
0.19 263.42
1.40
18873.39 100.00
0.00
10955.51 58.05
Black-throated blue warbler
MiDNR
Status 4
9.55
USFS
0.17
Cape May warbler
MiDNR
Status 4
17.52
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Magnolia warbler
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Chestnut-sided warbler
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Yellow warbler
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
2.04
0.01
3375.85
15.30
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
5.93
43.12
0.20
43.12
0.20
0.51
0.00
201.52
0.91
202.03
0.92
5.93
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.03
0.03
USFWS
6.10
14431.99
65.43
14431.99
65.43
169
USNPS
Total
0.03 100.04
0.45
270.43
1.23
196.10
0.89
260.85
1.18
3600.83
16.32
0.00
0.00
95.90
0.43
6891.06 31.24
3600.83
16.32
6.10
0.03 392.04
1.78
22057.89 100.00
14635.55 66.35
DRAFT 02/01/05
abpbx03060
Yellow-rumped warbler
MiDNR
Status 1
198.39
0.50
Status 2
159.18
0.40
Status 3
7927.96
20.07
Status 4
Total
6.94
0.02
8292.47
20.99
abpbx03100
Status 1
176.86
0.49
Status 2
127.92
0.35
Status 3
5628.90
15.56
Total
3.61
0.01
5937.29
16.41
abpbx03120
Status 1
47.12
0.27
Status 2
70.28
0.40
Status 3
3501.17
19.70
Total
2.39
0.01
3620.96
20.38
abpbx03130
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
2.80
0.47
Status 3
16.84
2.85
Status 4
0.00
0.00
19.64
3.32
abpbx03170
Status 1
9.42
0.12
Status 2
35.94
0.45
Status 3
1959.20
24.39
Total
1.24
0.02
2005.80
24.97
abpbx03180
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
9.65
0.35
Status 3
863.61
31.25
Total
0.24
96.63
0.24
2.70
0.01
395.48
1.00
398.18
1.01
31.20
USFWS
0.08
75.04
22983.77
58.18
22983.77
58.18
USNPS
Total
0.19 251.11
0.64
555.74
1.41
232.62
0.59
391.80
0.99
7021.62
17.77
0.00
0.00 123.41
0.31
15172.32 38.41
7021.62
17.77
75.04
0.19 607.14
1.54
39506.05 100.00
23386.19 59.20
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
19.44
83.69
0.23
83.69
0.23
0.79
0.00
358.65
0.99
359.44
0.99
19.44
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.05
0.05
47.49
23137.82
63.95
23137.82
63.95
USNPS
Total
0.13 165.89
0.46
409.68
1.13
218.16
0.60
346.08
0.96
6100.56
16.86
0.00
0.00 113.15
0.31
11927.09 32.96
6100.56
16.86
47.49
0.13 497.20
1.37
36182.93 100.00
23500.08 64.95
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
13.71
67.94
0.38
67.94
0.38
0.48
0.00
217.11
1.22
217.59
1.22
13.71
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.08
0.08
42.82
9784.42
55.07
9784.42
55.07
3830.58
21.56
0.00
3830.58
21.56
42.82
USNPS
Total
0.24 129.65
0.73
233.30
1.31
40.56
0.23
110.84
0.62
20.18
0.11
7420.35 41.76
0.24 190.39
1.07
17768.41 100.00
0.00
10003.92 56.30
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
1.54
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.58
0.77
4.58
0.77
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.26
0.00
1.54
0.26
565.49
95.64
565.49
95.64
0.00
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.54
0.26
0.00
0.00
2.80
0.47
0.00
0.00
16.84
2.85
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
570.07 96.42
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
591.25 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
7.01
39.60
0.49
39.60
0.49
0.13
0.00
87.63
1.09
87.76
1.09
7.01
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.09
0.09
USFWS
39.41
3837.27
47.77
3837.27
47.77
0.49
USNPS
Total
11.51
0.14
67.35
0.84
16.79
0.21
52.73
0.66
1976.04
24.60
0.00
0.00
12.10
0.15
3987.07 49.63
1976.04
24.60
39.41
0.49
40.40
0.50
8033.29 100.00
3926.14 48.87
Kirtland's warbler
MiDNR
Status 4
96.63
USFS
0.08
Pine warbler
MiDNR
Status 4
31.20
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Yellow-throated warbler
MiDNR
Total
Nature
Conservancy
Blackburnian warbler
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Black-throated green warbler
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
1.20
0.04
874.46
31.64
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.00
39.74
1.44
39.74
1.44
0.01
0.00
28.17
1.02
28.18
1.02
0.00
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.00
0.00
783.59
28.35
783.59
28.35
170
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.65
0.35
0.00
Total
1037.62
37.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1940.98 70.23
1037.62
37.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2763.59 100.00
812.96 29.42
DRAFT 02/01/05
abpbx03190
Prairie warbler
MiDNR
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
20.83
0.82
Status 3
375.62
14.72
Status 4
Total
1.22
0.05
397.67
15.58
abpbx03210
Status 1
25.00
0.33
Status 2
41.19
0.54
Status 3
1963.69
25.84
Total
1.40
0.02
2031.28
26.72
abpbx03220
Status 1
37.87
0.62
Status 2
14.98
0.25
Status 3
823.26
13.51
Total
0.11
0.00
876.22
14.38
abpbx03240
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
35.51
0.30
Status 3
1024.35
8.65
0.64
0.01
1060.50
8.95
Total
abpbx05010
Status 1
194.38
0.50
Status 2
137.96
0.35
Status 3
5589.27
14.38
Total
7.25
0.02
5928.86
15.25
abpbx06010
Status 1
238.05
0.34
Status 2
263.11
0.37
Status 3 10418.98
14.80
Total
1.96
50.06
1.96
0.01
0.00
31.94
1.25
31.95
1.25
1.75
0.07
1173.77
45.99
1173.77
45.99
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.75
0.07
24.96
0.98
45.79
1.79
0.00
Total
871.99
34.17
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1297.68 50.85
871.99
34.17
0.00
0.00
24.96
0.98
2552.15 100.00
1206.93 47.29
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
12.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.25
0.02
69.16
0.91
70.41
0.93
12.80
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.17
0.17
52.12
3953.84
52.02
3953.84
52.02
1367.86
18.00
0.00
1367.86
18.00
52.12
0.69
USNPS
Total
93.85
1.23
183.77
2.42
7.23
0.10
48.42
0.64
11.29
0.15
3344.09 44.00
0.69 112.37
1.48
7600.68 100.00
0.00
4024.40 52.95
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
5.78
0.55
0.01
0.55
0.01
0.30
0.00
83.66
1.37
83.96
1.38
5.78
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.09
0.09
3.09
3560.20
58.41
3560.20
58.41
USNPS
Total
0.05 118.36
1.94
165.10
2.71
6.82
0.11
21.80
0.36
1431.97
23.49
0.00
0.00
8.28
0.14
2264.36 37.15
1431.97
23.49
3.09
0.05 133.46
2.19
6095.23 100.00
3643.97 59.78
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
10.92
4.00
0.03
4.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
109.66
0.93
109.66
0.93
10.92
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.09
0.09
10053.65
84.85
10053.65
84.85
USFWS
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.92
0.09
16.80
0.14
52.31
0.44
0.00
550.04
4.64
13.79
0.12
29.04
0.25
1621.22 13.68
550.04
4.64
13.79
0.12
45.84
0.39
11848.40 100.00
10163.95 85.78
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
9.66
106.09
0.27
106.09
0.27
0.56
0.00
327.86
0.84
328.42
0.84
9.66
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.02
0.02
13.26
27461.68
70.64
27461.68
70.64
USNPS
Total
0.03 286.16
0.74
503.46
1.30
207.22
0.53
345.18
0.89
4423.16
11.38
7.59
0.02 104.26
0.27
10230.93 26.32
4423.16
11.38
20.85
0.05 597.64
1.54
38876.36 100.00
27796.79 71.50
American redstart
MiDNR
Status 4
50.06
USFS
0.07
Black-and-white warbler
MiDNR
Status 4
1.75
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Cerulean warbler
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Bay-breasted warbler
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Palm warbler
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
10.32
0.01
10930.46
15.53
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
25.27
212.15
0.30
212.15
0.30
1.26
0.00
674.41
0.96
675.67
0.96
25.27
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.04
0.04
277.65
51550.17
73.25
51550.17
73.25
171
USNPS
Total
0.39 305.74
0.43
846.71
1.20
249.93
0.36
513.04
0.73
6006.23
8.53
20.84
0.03 120.98
0.17
16780.44 23.84
6006.23
8.53 298.49
0.42 676.65
0.96
70375.09 100.00
52234.90 74.22
DRAFT 02/01/05
abpbx07010
Prothonotary warbler
MiDNR
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
7.06
0.36
Status 3
115.58
5.96
Status 4
0.00
0.00
122.64
6.32
Total
abpbx08010
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
2.99
0.36
Status 3
23.01
2.81
Status 4
0.00
0.00
26.00
3.17
abpbx10010
Status 1
230.84
0.42
Status 2
196.20
0.36
Status 3
8484.53
15.57
Total
9.00
0.02
8920.57
16.37
abpbx10020
Status 1
8.03
0.17
Status 2
31.06
0.64
Status 3
1041.84
21.46
Total
2.61
0.05
1083.54
22.32
abpbx10030
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
16.27
0.46
Status 3
200.23
5.67
0.26
0.01
216.76
6.13
Total
abpbx11020
Status 1
37.50
0.33
Status 2
80.97
0.71
Status 3
3185.67
27.92
Total
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
26.05
1.34
26.05
1.34
9.27
2.74
0.14
1775.39
91.53
1775.39
91.53
0.48
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.74
0.14
0.00
0.00
7.06
0.36
0.00
0.00
128.54
6.63
3.69
0.00
0.19
Total
1801.44 92.87
9.27
0.48
3.69
0.19
0.00
0.00
1939.78 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.48
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
11.97
1.46
11.97
1.46
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.06
0.04
0.48
0.06
781.18
95.30
781.18
95.30
0.00
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.48
0.06
0.00
0.00
2.99
0.36
0.00
0.00
23.05
2.81
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
793.15 96.76
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
819.67 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
18.96
172.61
0.32
172.61
0.32
0.92
0.00
501.36
0.92
502.28
0.92
18.96
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.03
0.03
51.96
36552.65
67.09
36552.65
67.09
USNPS
Total
0.10 343.62
0.63
645.38
1.18
237.90
0.44
434.10
0.80
7555.75
13.87
8.37
0.02 114.37
0.21
16336.55 29.99
7555.75
13.87
60.33
0.11 695.89
1.28
54479.04 100.00
37063.01 68.03
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
2.33
4.57
0.09
4.57
0.09
0.41
0.01
83.02
1.71
83.43
1.72
2.33
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.05
0.05
33.94
3056.52
62.95
3056.52
62.95
0.70
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
44.30
0.91
8.89
0.18
39.95
0.82
575.86
11.86
0.00
0.00
6.02
0.12
1628.70 33.55
575.86
11.86
33.94
0.70
14.91
0.31
4855.10 100.00
3142.15 64.72
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
2.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
52.87
1.50
52.87
1.50
2.29
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.06
0.06
3038.46
85.99
3038.46
85.99
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.29
0.06
0.00
0.00
16.27
0.46
0.00
Total
223.03
6.31
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
423.26 11.98
223.03
6.31
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3533.41 100.00
3091.59 87.50
Connecticut warbler
MiDNR
Status 4
0.00
USFS
0.14
Louisiana waterthrush
MiDNR
Status 4
2.74
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Northern waterthrush
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Ovenbird
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Worm-eating warbler
MiDNR
Total
MiMilitary
4.43
0.04
3308.57
29.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
20.46
7.76
0.07
7.76
0.07
1.91
0.02
112.79
0.99
114.70
1.01
20.46
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.18
0.18
USFWS
207.00
5936.63
52.03
5936.63
52.03
172
1693.63
14.84
0.00
1693.63
14.84 207.00
1.81
USNPS
Total
93.60
0.82
358.56
3.14
12.73
0.11
93.70
0.82
14.90
0.13
4903.87 42.98
1.81 121.23
1.06
11409.98 100.00
0.00
6053.85 53.06
DRAFT 02/01/05
abpbx11030
Mourning warbler
MiDNR
Status 1
290.26
0.35
Status 2
335.79
0.41
Status 3 14211.29
17.26
Status 4
Total
14.41
0.02
14851.75
18.04
abpbx12010
Status 1
45.01
0.41
Status 2
67.31
0.61
Status 3
2441.85
22.19
Total
2.21
0.02
2556.38
23.23
abpbx16010
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
7.66
0.39
Status 3
130.20
6.56
Status 4
0.00
0.00
137.86
6.94
abpbx16020
Status 1
34.53
0.60
Status 2
42.23
0.73
Status 3
2182.62
37.84
Total
1.80
0.03
2261.18
39.21
abpbx16030
Status 1
159.25
0.64
Status 2
80.17
0.32
Status 3
3333.08
13.30
Total
2.10
0.01
3574.60
14.26
abpbx24010
0.25
209.65
0.25
3.21
0.00
834.41
1.01
837.62
1.02
10378.94
43.27
USFWS
172.15
0.05
54866.05
66.65
54866.05
66.65 10378.94
USNPS
Total
0.21 512.57
0.62
1018.25
1.24
278.58
0.34
614.37
0.75
18.86
0.02 144.34
0.18
24966.29 30.33
12.61 191.01
0.23 935.49
1.14
82313.78 100.00
12.61
55714.87 67.69
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
10.40
8.12
0.07
8.12
0.07
0.31
0.00
138.95
1.26
139.26
1.27
10.40
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.09
0.09
265.59
7051.88
64.09
7051.88
64.09
2.41
USNPS
Total
18.41
0.17
339.41
3.08
10.39
0.09
77.70
0.71
927.68
8.43
7.94
0.07
7.65
0.07
3393.55 30.84
927.68
8.43 273.53
2.49
36.45
0.33
11003.70 100.00
7193.04 65.37
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
1.11
1.61
1.61
0.08
0.08
0.00
0.00
14.30
0.72
14.30
0.72
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.06
5.21
1.11
0.06
1825.03
91.91
1825.03
91.91
0.26
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.11
0.06
0.51
0.03
8.17
0.41
0.00
0.00
137.02
6.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
1839.33 92.63
5.21
0.26
0.00
0.00
0.51
0.03
1985.63 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
15.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
34.08
0.59
34.08
0.59
15.70
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.27
0.27
206.78
2361.84
40.95
2361.84
40.95
3.59
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
257.01
4.46
7.87
0.14
50.10
0.87
868.14
15.05
0.00
0.00
11.69
0.20
3062.45 53.10
868.14
15.05 206.78
3.59
19.56
0.34
5767.28 100.00
2397.72 41.57
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
7.98
43.63
0.17
43.63
0.17
0.57
0.00
231.21
0.92
231.78
0.92
7.98
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.03
0.03
6.45
17118.56
68.31
17118.56
68.31
USNPS
Total
0.03 100.12
0.40
273.80
1.09
196.91
0.79
277.08
1.11
3685.48
14.71
0.00
0.00
95.64
0.38
7158.40 28.56
3685.48
14.71
6.45
0.03 392.67
1.57
25061.15 100.00
17351.87 69.24
Yellow-breasted chat
MiDNR
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
11.23
0.33
Status 3
229.18
6.67
Status 4
0.00
0.00
240.41
7.00
Total
209.65
USFS
0.05
Canada warbler
MiDNR
Status 4
43.27
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Wilson's warbler
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Hooded warbler
MiDNR
Total
MiOther
Common yellowthroat
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
1.77
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
36.27
1.06
36.27
1.06
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.05
24.50
1.77
0.05
3131.47
91.18
3131.47
91.18
173
0.71
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.77
0.05
0.00
0.00
11.23
0.33
0.00
0.00
253.68
7.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
3167.74 92.24
24.50
0.71
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3434.42 100.00
DRAFT 02/01/05
abpbx45040
Scarlet tanager
MiDNR
Status 1
162.12
0.45
Status 2
123.86
0.35
Status 3
4511.43
12.64
Status 4
Total
4.11
0.01
4801.52
13.46
abpbx60010
Status 1
253.46
0.37
Status 2
257.55
0.38
Status 3 11013.48
16.08
Total
11.29
0.02
11535.78
16.85
abpbx61030
Status 1
162.12
0.45
Status 2
123.86
0.35
Status 3
4511.43
12.64
Total
4.11
0.01
4801.52
13.46
abpbx64030
Status 1
223.76
0.39
Status 2
200.72
0.35
Status 3
8459.14
14.62
Total
8.76
0.02
8892.38
15.36
abpbx65010
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
172.85
0.37
Status 3
6865.60
14.89
Total
8.08
0.02
7046.53
15.28
abpbx74030
Status 1
14.61
0.04
Status 2
132.14
0.39
Status 3
5140.77
15.20
Total
0.28
101.44
0.28
0.59
0.00
308.63
0.86
309.22
0.87
9.57
USFWS
0.03
6.50
25686.17
71.98
25686.17
71.98
4357.33
12.21
6.72
4357.33
12.21
13.22
USNPS
Total
0.02 111.69
0.31
289.88
0.81
197.12
0.55
320.98
0.90
96.23
0.27
9073.74 25.43
0.04 405.04
1.14
35683.51 100.00
0.02
25998.91 72.86
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
27.96
199.89
0.29
199.89
0.29
1.17
0.00
667.50
0.97
668.67
0.98
27.96
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.04
0.04
18.78
47216.41
68.96
47216.41
68.96
0.03
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
300.20
0.44
261.60
0.38
519.15
0.76
8389.87
12.25
19.46
0.03 135.06
0.20
19758.93 28.86
8389.87
12.25
38.24
0.06 396.66
0.58
68473.48 100.00
47895.20 69.95
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
9.57
101.44
0.28
101.44
0.28
0.59
0.00
308.63
0.86
309.22
0.87
9.57
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.03
0.03
6.50
25686.17
71.98
25686.17
71.98
4357.33
12.21
6.72
4357.33
12.21
13.22
USNPS
Total
0.02 111.69
0.31
289.88
0.81
197.12
0.55
320.98
0.90
96.23
0.27
9073.74 25.43
0.04 405.04
1.14
35683.51 100.00
0.02
25998.91 72.86
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
18.84
156.91
0.27
156.91
0.27
1.14
0.00
544.04
0.94
545.18
0.94
18.84
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.03
0.03
19.33
41368.12
71.47
41368.12
71.47
USNPS
Total
0.03 368.63
0.64
630.56
1.09
238.72
0.41
439.44
0.76
6141.12
10.61
14.10
0.02 116.11
0.20
14888.52 25.72
6141.12
10.61
33.43
0.06 723.46
1.25
57879.44 100.00
41920.92 72.43
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
13.77
149.54
0.32
149.54
0.32
1.00
0.00
449.91
0.98
450.91
0.98
13.77
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.03
0.03
34519.29
74.84
34519.29
74.84
USFWS
USNPS
0.87
0.00
0.00
14.64
0.03
161.81
0.35
334.66
0.73
0.00
Total
3765.80
8.16
14.18
0.03
0.00
0.00
10796.12 23.41
3765.80
8.16
15.05
0.03 161.81
0.35
46122.70 100.00
34977.28 75.84
Eastern towhee
MiDNR
Status 4
101.44
USFS
0.03
Dickcissel
MiDNR
Status 4
9.57
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Indigo bunting
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Rose-breasted grosbeak
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Northern cardinal
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
4.43
0.01
5291.95
15.64
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
11.19
195.57
0.58
195.57
0.58
0.23
0.00
325.64
0.96
325.87
0.96
11.19
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.03
0.03
50.96
24510.16
72.46
24510.16
72.46
174
0.15
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
76.76
0.23
52.74
0.16
184.88
0.55
3356.80
9.92
7.51
0.02
23.56
0.07
8724.44 25.79
3356.80
9.92
58.47
0.17
76.30
0.23
33826.31 100.00
24840.23 73.43
DRAFT 02/01/05
abpbx94020
Chipping sparrow
MiDNR
Status 1
103.45
0.19
Status 2
202.22
0.37
Status 3
8338.68
15.26
Status 4
Total
9.06
0.02
8653.41
15.84
abpbx94030
Status 1
2.38
0.04
Status 2
20.63
0.31
Status 3
1255.11
18.59
Total
0.71
0.01
1278.83
18.94
abpbx94050
Status 1
11.61
0.05
Status 2
86.33
0.37
Status 3
3811.35
16.46
Total
2.17
0.01
3911.46
16.89
abpbx95010
Status 1
1.19
0.00
Status 2
74.93
0.15
Status 3
1238.04
2.50
Status 4
1.76
0.00
1315.92
2.66
abpbx99010
Status 1
14.95
0.06
Status 2
78.17
0.30
Status 3
1206.94
4.58
Status 4
1.81
0.01
1301.87
4.94
abpbxa0020
0.47
255.75
0.47
0.68
0.00
553.78
1.01
554.46
1.01
16.73
USFWS
0.03
58.81
38686.14
70.81
38686.14
70.81
5942.58
10.88
9.35
5942.58
10.88
68.16
USNPS
Total
0.11 327.92
0.60
506.91
0.93
96.91
0.18
299.13
0.55
32.34
0.06
14579.38 26.69
0.12 457.17
0.84
54634.40 100.00
0.02
39248.98 71.84
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
1.57
49.77
0.74
49.77
0.74
0.13
0.00
81.36
1.21
81.49
1.21
1.57
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.02
0.02
11.15
4596.34
68.08
4596.34
68.08
0.17
USNPS
Total
1.76
0.03
16.86
0.25
12.74
0.19
33.37
0.49
713.70
10.57
0.00
0.00
3.56
0.05
2022.27 29.96
713.70
10.57
11.15
0.17
18.06
0.27
6750.91 100.00
4678.41 69.30
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
9.44
135.92
0.59
135.92
0.59
0.19
0.00
237.00
1.02
237.19
1.02
9.44
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.04
0.04
50.23
16189.74
69.91
16189.74
69.91
0.22
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
71.28
0.31
47.55
0.21
133.88
0.58
2553.48
11.03
2.75
0.01
21.46
0.09
6525.15 28.18
2553.48
11.03
52.98
0.23
69.01
0.30
23159.22 100.00
16428.91 70.94
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
4.20
77.34
77.34
0.16
0.16
0.06
0.00
247.87
0.50
247.93
0.50
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.01
382.46
4.20
0.01
47433.05
95.82
47433.05
95.82
0.77
USFWS
USNPS
5.83
1.40
0.00
12.62
0.03
25.12
0.05
100.05
0.20
1.16
0.00
1708.99
3.45
9.93
0.01
0.02
Total
47682.68 96.32
382.46
0.77
15.76
0.03
27.68
0.06
49504.34 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
7.51
6.73
6.73
0.03
0.03
0.18
0.00
154.69
0.59
154.87
0.59
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
174.14
404.37
7.51
USFWS
0.03
0.03
24249.67
92.02
24249.67
92.02
1.53
8.38
0.66
0.03
USNPS
Total
13.86
0.05
210.46
0.80
30.02
0.11
108.19
0.41
1.39
0.01
1627.99
6.18
24406.17 92.61
404.37
1.53 182.52
0.69
45.27
0.17
26352.81 100.00
Grasshopper sparrow
MiDNR
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
58.62
0.21
Status 3
940.24
3.32
Status 4
1.51
0.01
1000.37
3.53
Total
255.75
USFS
0.03
Savannah sparrow
MiDNR
Total
16.73
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Vesper sparrow
MiDNR
Total
Nature
Conservancy
Field sparrow
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Clay-colored sparrow
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
2.86
78.42
78.42
0.28
0.28
0.09
0.00
166.73
0.59
166.82
0.59
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.01
224.09
2.86
0.01
26844.37
94.72
26844.37
94.72
175
0.79
USFWS
USNPS
4.08
0.00
0.00
6.94
0.02
21.02
0.07
79.64
0.28
0.00
0.00
1242.84
4.39
0.00
0.01
0.00
Total
27012.61 95.31
224.09
0.79
4.08
0.01
21.02
0.07
28342.03 100.00
DRAFT 02/01/05
abpbxa0030
Henslow's sparrow
MiDNR
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
48.98
0.23
Status 3
705.32
3.32
Status 4
0.00
0.00
754.30
3.55
Total
abpbxa0040
Status 1
16.03
0.63
Status 2
15.59
0.62
Status 3
576.53
22.76
Total
1.23
0.05
609.38
24.06
abpbxa3010
Status 1
32.33
0.07
Status 2
117.00
0.26
Status 3
3290.12
7.31
3.23
0.01
3442.68
7.65
Total
abpbxa3020
Status 1
47.00
0.23
Status 2
122.82
0.60
Status 3
5667.03
27.84
Total
5.61
0.03
5842.46
28.71
abpbxa3030
Status 1
49.24
0.34
Status 2
82.19
0.56
Status 3
3093.12
21.22
Total
2.68
0.02
3227.23
22.14
abpbxa4020
Status 1
99.84
0.28
Status 2
171.19
0.48
Status 3
8068.55
22.70
Total
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.00
134.09
0.63
134.24
0.63
170.57
3.29
0.02
20190.72
94.94
20190.72
94.94
0.80
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.29
0.02
14.30
0.07
63.28
0.30
0.00
0.00
876.04
4.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total
20324.81 95.57
170.57
0.80
0.00
0.00
14.30
0.07
21267.42 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
3.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
24.59
0.97
24.59
0.97
3.29
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.13
0.13
178.95
1498.43
59.16
1498.43
59.16
7.07
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
198.27
7.83
1.11
0.04
16.70
0.66
216.93
8.57
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
793.52 31.33
216.93
8.57 178.95
7.07
1.17
0.05
2532.74 100.00
1524.25 60.18
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
8.07
101.44
0.23
101.44
0.23
0.28
0.00
346.41
0.77
346.69
0.77
8.07
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.02
0.02
103.55
39789.68
88.38
39789.68
88.38
0.23
USNPS
Total
24.55
0.05
168.50
0.37
39.74
0.09
156.74
0.35
1139.14
2.53
11.12
0.02
15.69
0.03
4557.79 10.12
1139.14
2.53 114.67
0.25
79.98
0.18
45022.35 100.00
40139.32 89.15
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
26.28
57.49
0.28
57.49
0.28
2.17
0.01
226.25
1.11
228.42
1.12
26.28
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.13
0.13
246.98
10158.90
49.91
10158.90
49.91
3607.98
17.73
0.00
3607.98
17.73 246.98
USNPS
Total
1.21 117.09
0.58
437.35
2.15
39.85
0.20
162.67
0.80
27.23
0.13
9361.90 46.00
1.21 184.17
0.90
20352.68 100.00
0.00
10390.76 51.05
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
15.11
10.59
0.07
10.59
0.07
0.52
0.00
186.75
1.28
187.27
1.28
15.11
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.10
0.10
296.48
9580.42
65.73
9580.42
65.73
2.03
USNPS
Total
42.00
0.29
402.83
2.76
13.08
0.09
95.27
0.65
1183.05
8.12
12.60
0.09
8.47
0.06
4308.35 29.56
1183.05
8.12 309.08
2.12
63.55
0.44
14576.30 100.00
9769.85 67.03
White-throated sparrow
MiDNR
Status 4
0.00
USFS
0.02
Swamp sparrow
MiDNR
Status 4
3.29
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Lincoln's sparrow
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Song sparrow
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Le Conte's sparrow
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
7.45
0.02
8347.03
23.48
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
32.34
103.73
0.29
103.73
0.29
2.52
0.01
417.47
1.17
419.99
1.18
32.34
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.09
0.09
USFWS
166.61
20128.22
56.62
20128.22
56.62
176
5988.50
16.85
0.00
5988.50
16.85 166.61
USNPS
Total
0.47 251.38
0.71
550.17
1.55
69.28
0.19
240.47
0.68
41.92
0.12
14205.22 39.96
0.47 362.58
1.02
35549.00 100.00
0.00
20553.14 57.82
DRAFT 02/01/05
abpbxa5020
Dark-eyed junco
MiDNR
Status 1
47.80
0.18
Status 2
89.42
0.34
Status 3
4968.17
18.88
Status 4
Total
3.19
0.01
5108.58
19.42
abpbxa9010
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
26.66
0.13
Status 3
105.62
0.50
Status 4
0.87
0.00
133.15
0.63
abpbxb0010
Status 1
45.30
0.14
Status 2
96.02
0.29
Status 3
2640.84
7.98
3.18
0.01
2785.34
8.42
Total
abpbxb2020
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
26.66
0.13
Status 3
105.62
0.50
Status 4
0.87
0.00
133.15
0.63
abpbxb2030
Status 1
0.02
0.00
Status 2
19.97
0.10
Status 3
596.80
3.01
Status 4
0.90
0.00
617.69
3.12
abpbxb3010
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
0.45
0.33
Status 3
27.16
19.76
Total
0.62
164.25
0.62
0.54
0.00
316.56
1.20
317.10
1.21
12.44
USFWS
0.05
52.12
16179.40
61.49
16179.40
61.49
4234.04
16.09
0.00
4234.04
16.09
52.12
USNPS
Total
0.20 150.04
0.57
262.40
1.00
66.95
0.25
156.37
0.59
25.81
0.10
9392.81 35.70
0.20 242.80
0.92
26310.73 100.00
0.00
16499.15 62.71
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
1.12
0.34
0.34
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
88.01
0.41
88.04
0.41
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.01
12.01
1.12
0.01
21060.28
98.87
21060.28
98.87
0.06
USFWS
USNPS
0.43
0.00
0.00
1.55
0.01
1.77
0.01
28.43
0.13
0.00
0.00
122.33
0.57
4.33
0.00
0.02
Total
21149.16 99.28
12.01
0.06
4.76
0.02
1.77
0.01
21301.47 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
13.48
8.78
0.03
8.78
0.03
0.39
0.00
237.02
0.72
237.41
0.72
13.48
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.04
0.04
271.84
28729.37
86.85
28729.37
86.85
0.82
USNPS
Total
24.78
0.07
355.40
1.07
12.10
0.04
108.12
0.33
972.77
2.94
16.26
0.05
7.97
0.02
3647.01 11.02
972.77
2.94 288.10
0.87
44.85
0.14
33080.10 100.00
28969.57 87.57
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
1.12
0.34
0.34
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
88.01
0.41
88.04
0.41
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.01
12.01
1.12
0.01
21060.28
98.87
21060.28
98.87
0.06
USFWS
USNPS
0.43
0.00
0.00
1.55
0.01
1.77
0.01
28.43
0.13
0.00
0.00
122.33
0.57
4.33
0.00
0.02
Total
21149.16 99.28
12.01
0.06
4.76
0.02
1.77
0.01
21301.47 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
2.40
77.95
77.95
0.39
0.39
0.02
0.00
113.18
0.57
113.20
0.57
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.01
130.08
2.40
0.01
18867.51
95.21
18867.51
95.21
0.66
USFWS
USNPS
1.34
0.00
0.00
3.76
0.02
6.24
0.03
26.21
0.13
0.04
0.00
804.89
4.06
0.00
0.01
0.00
Total
18981.59 95.79
130.08
0.66
1.34
0.01
6.28
0.03
19816.45 100.00
Yellow-headed blackbird
MiDNR
Status 4
164.25
USFS
0.05
Western meadowlark
MiDNR
Total
12.44
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Eastern meadowlark
MiDNR
Total
Nature
Conservancy
Red-winged blackbird
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Bobolink
MiDNR
Total
MiMilitary
0.07
0.05
27.68
20.14
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
3.62
2.63
3.63
2.64
0.02
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.01
0.01
15.78
78.98
57.47
78.98
57.47
177
11.48
USNPS
Total
0.00
0.00
15.80 11.50
0.00
0.00
0.45
0.33
10.22
7.44
1.13
0.82
0.00
0.00
38.52 28.03
10.22
7.44
16.91
12.30
0.00
0.00
137.44 100.00
82.67 60.15
DRAFT 02/01/05
abpbxb5010
Rusty blackbird
MiDNR
Status 1
5.86
0.32
Status 2
11.01
0.59
Status 3
485.81
26.25
Status 4
Total
0.00
0.00
502.68
27.16
abpbxb5020
Status 1
51.39
0.14
Status 2
160.83
0.45
Status 3
6518.75
18.10
Total
7.75
0.02
6738.72
18.71
abpbxb6070
Status 1
56.53
0.32
Status 2
91.83
0.52
Status 3
4221.21
23.90
Total
4.02
0.02
4373.59
24.76
abpbxb7030
Status 1
241.22
0.26
Status 2
280.37
0.30
Status 3 10820.88
11.50
Total
11.06
0.01
11353.53
12.07
abpbxb9070
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
32.34
0.37
Status 3
538.76
6.23
Status 4
0.14
0.00
571.24
6.60
abpbxb9190
Status 1
164.69
0.28
Status 2
209.27
0.35
Status 3
7022.77
11.82
Total
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.28
0.02
16.76
0.91
17.04
0.92
3.82
0.21
1089.46
58.87
1089.46
58.87
USFWS
USNPS
Total
0.45
0.00
0.00
10.13
0.55
0.25
0.01
11.26
0.61
0.02
236.06
12.75
0.00
0.00
1.01
0.05
723.16 39.07
236.06
12.75
0.45
0.02
1.26
0.07
1850.77 100.00
1106.22 59.77
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
34.40
34.81
0.10
34.81
0.10
2.62
0.01
401.78
1.12
404.40
1.12
34.40
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.10
0.10
259.18
25160.32
69.85
25160.32
69.85
3128.72
8.69
0.00
3128.72
8.69 259.18
USNPS
Total
0.72 205.62
0.57
550.59
1.53
26.62
0.07
187.45
0.52
25.34
0.07
9710.24 26.96
0.72 257.58
0.72
36018.13 100.00
0.00
25569.85 70.99
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
23.05
17.92
0.10
17.92
0.10
1.59
0.01
199.43
1.13
201.02
1.14
23.05
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.13
0.13
279.08
11056.22
62.59
11056.22
62.59
1.58
USNPS
Total
55.08
0.31
413.74
2.34
18.01
0.10
109.84
0.62
1613.46
9.13
12.16
0.07
14.67
0.08
5881.01 33.29
1613.46
9.13 291.24
1.65
87.76
0.50
17664.26 100.00
11259.67 63.74
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
26.57
269.73
0.29
269.73
0.29
1.10
0.00
779.73
0.83
780.83
0.83
26.57
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.03
0.03
64.83
72105.85
76.64
72105.85
76.64
USNPS
Total
0.07 417.88
0.44
750.50
0.80
275.11
0.29
555.48
0.59
8647.16
9.19
14.81
0.02 129.15
0.14
19882.83 21.13
8647.16
9.19
79.64
0.08 822.14
0.87
94085.45 100.00
72896.64 77.48
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
1.68
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
77.17
0.89
77.17
0.89
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.02
209.67
1.68
0.02
7765.75
89.75
7765.75
89.75
2.42
USFWS
USNPS
1.46
0.00
0.00
3.14
0.04
25.77
0.30
58.11
0.67
0.00
0.00
748.43
8.65
0.00
0.02
0.00
Total
7843.06 90.64
209.67
2.42
1.46
0.02
25.77
0.30
8652.74 100.00
Baltimore oriole
MiDNR
Status 4
0.00
USFS
0.21
Orchard oriole
MiDNR
Total
3.82
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
Brown-headed cowbird
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Common grackle
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
Brewer's blackbird
MiDNR
Status 4
MiMilitary
5.66
0.01
7402.39
12.46
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
19.08
184.62
0.31
184.62
0.31
0.99
0.00
569.75
0.96
570.74
0.96
19.08
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.03
0.03
14.40
45539.45
76.67
45539.45
76.67
178
USNPS
Total
0.02 131.05
0.22
329.22
0.55
231.89
0.39
441.16
0.74
5186.70
8.73
17.05
0.03 103.10
0.17
12515.23 21.07
5186.70
8.73
31.45
0.05 466.04
0.78
59400.47 100.00
46114.86 77.63
DRAFT 02/01/05
abpby04020
Purple finch
MiDNR
Status 1
40.03
0.19
Status 2
116.49
0.54
Status 3
5228.57
24.30
Status 4
Total
4.86
0.02
5389.95
25.05
abpby04040
Status 1
0.00
0.00
Status 2
9.94
0.27
Status 3
35.62
0.98
Status 4
0.11
0.00
45.67
1.25
abpby05010
Status 1
40.02
0.26
Status 2
76.49
0.49
Status 3
3803.16
24.51
Total
4.90
0.03
3924.57
25.29
abpby05020
Status 1
30.67
0.37
Status 2
53.82
0.65
Status 3
1887.36
22.83
Total
3.49
0.04
1975.34
23.89
abpby06030
Status 1
68.36
0.25
Status 2
138.23
0.50
Status 3
5751.21
20.87
Total
5.58
0.02
5963.38
21.64
abpby06110
Status 1
2.19
0.01
Status 2
49.04
0.33
Status 3
1849.78
12.37
Total
0.25
53.82
0.25
2.05
0.01
240.80
1.12
242.85
1.13
26.64
USFWS
0.12
69.79
11532.99
53.61
11532.99
53.61
3967.10
18.44
0.80
3967.10
18.44
70.59
USNPS
Total
0.32 163.98
0.76
300.44
1.40
38.49
0.18
154.98
0.72
27.25
0.13
9279.59 43.13
0.33 229.72
1.07
21513.66 100.00
0.00
11778.65 54.75
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
0.18
0.92
0.92
0.03
0.03
0.00
0.00
29.45
0.81
29.45
0.81
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.00
9.77
0.18
0.00
3561.67
97.59
3561.67
97.59
0.27
USFWS
USNPS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.18
0.00
0.72
0.02
10.66
0.29
0.00
0.00
47.37
1.30
1.06
0.00
0.03
Total
3591.23 98.40
9.77
0.27
1.06
0.03
0.72
0.02
3649.44 100.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
19.33
53.25
0.34
53.25
0.34
1.37
0.01
179.88
1.16
181.25
1.17
19.33
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.12
0.12
68.94
7763.86
50.03
7763.86
50.03
3292.43
21.22
0.00
3292.43
21.22
68.94
USNPS
Total
0.44 152.64
0.98
280.93
1.81
33.67
0.22
110.16
0.71
27.51
0.18
7177.72 46.26
0.44 213.82
1.38
15517.45 100.00
0.00
7948.64 51.22
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
16.45
14.04
0.17
14.04
0.17
1.33
0.02
93.43
1.13
94.76
1.15
16.45
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.20
0.20
0.15
4284.79
51.83
4284.79
51.83
USNPS
Total
0.00 141.76
1.71
189.03
2.29
12.13
0.15
65.95
0.80
1712.17
20.71
0.00
0.00
15.24
0.18
3630.14 43.91
1712.17
20.71
0.15
0.00 169.13
2.05
8266.83 100.00
4381.71 53.00
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
27.90
77.53
0.28
77.53
0.28
2.15
0.01
321.27
1.17
323.42
1.17
27.90
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.10
0.10
64.80
15544.51
56.41
15544.51
56.41
5247.07
19.04
0.92
5247.07
19.04
65.72
USNPS
Total
0.24 221.19
0.80
382.25
1.39
58.26
0.21
196.49
0.71
29.31
0.11
11108.19 40.31
0.24 308.76
1.12
27558.29 100.00
0.00
15871.36 57.59
American goldfinch
MiDNR
Status 4
53.82
USFS
0.12
Pine siskin
MiDNR
Status 4
26.64
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
White-winged crossbill
MiDNR
Status 4
Nature
Conservancy
Red crossbill
MiDNR
Status 4
MiOther
House finch
MiDNR
Total
MiMilitary
0.92
0.01
1901.93
12.72
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
2.62
96.32
0.64
96.32
0.64
0.06
0.00
150.28
1.01
150.34
1.01
2.62
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
USFWS
0.02
0.02
10.81
12149.65
81.26
12149.65
81.26
179
0.07
USNPS
Total
20.00
0.13
35.62
0.24
30.76
0.21
79.80
0.53
576.91
3.86
2.10
0.01
9.36
0.06
2534.53 16.95
576.91
3.86
12.91
0.09
60.12
0.40
14950.80 100.00
12300.85 82.28
DRAFT 02/01/05
abpby09020
Evening grosbeak
MiDNR
Status 1
31.31
0.39
Status 2
27.42
0.34
Status 3
1416.53
17.55
Status 4
Total
1.26
0.02
1476.52
18.29
MiMilitary
MiOther
Nature
Conservancy
2.98
30.12
0.37
30.12
0.37
0.26
0.00
100.83
1.25
101.09
1.25
2.98
Other (Mostly
Private Land)
USFS
0.04
0.04
USFWS
3.79
4896.14
60.65
4896.14
60.65
180
0.05
USNPS
Total
64.23
0.80
102.31
1.27
28.50
0.35
55.92
0.69
1461.01
18.10
0.00
0.00
8.50
0.11
2916.42 36.13
1461.01
18.10
3.79
0.05 101.23
1.25
8072.88 100.00
4998.23 61.91
DRAFT 02/01/05
Appendix J. List of Example GAP Applications
Businesses and Non-government Organizations
The following are some examples of applications of GAP data by the private sector:
 The Wyoming Natural Heritage Program (a private non-government organization)
transformed the endangered and sensitive species database into a spatially referenced
digital geographic information system using the GAP digital base map and other GAP
spatial data.
 Hughes Corp. is experimenting with the Utah and Nevada GAP digital base maps,
simulating images to aid the development of new space-based remote sensing devices.
 The Nature Conservancy used the Wyoming GAP data to develop a map of
ecoregions of Wyoming.
 Weyerhaeuser Corp. is using the Arkansas GAP data in managing their lands in
Arkansas.
 IBM Corp. is funding a project at the University of California-Santa Barbara that, in
part, uses GAP data in the development of visualization software.
 NM-GAP vegetation data is being used for an environmental assessment of a
proposed spaceport, a state/private venture.
County and City Planning
Some other examples of the use of GAP by local governments are:
 CA-GAP biological data were combined with the Southern California Association of
Governments (SCAG) land ownership data to show which ownerships and jurisdictions
were needed for joint conservation planning and management of a particular natural
community or species, maximizing efficiency and minimizing the potential for yet
another conservation crisis.
 In California, county and city planners of several jurisdictions, wildlife agencies,
developers of the 4S Ranch property, and the state Natural Communities Conservation
Planning program used the GAP regional data, as well as more detailed information, to
conserve 1,640 acres of habitat within a 2,900-acre planned development.
 Day-to-day county planning operations in Piute, Grande, and Washington counties,
Utah.
 County planners in Piute County, Utah, used GAP data to optimize the siting of a
proposed sawmill for aspen with respect to the distribution of aspen stands.
 Missoula County, Montana, used the GAP land cover map of the area as a base map
for its comprehensive long-range plan.
 Snohomish County, Washington, used the GAP land cover map in meeting state
requirements for a growth management plan.
 The City of Bainbridge Island, Washington, used GAP data to assist them in
development of a watershed planning project.
State Uses
181
DRAFT 02/01/05
The following are some examples of uses of GAP data by state agencies.
 The GAP database of species habitats was used by the Tennessee Wildlife Resources
Agency (TWRA) to update its book "Species in Need of Management."
 Images of land cover derived from GAP TM data are used by TWRA for locating
particular habitat types. Information on the locations of these habitat types is provided by
TWRA to the public for a wide variety of public service functions, from education to
cooperative resource management.
 Early GAP data developed by TWRA were used to help identify an extremely
important area of the state with high biodiversity that was subsequently purchased by the
state for conservation.
 Preliminary findings from GAP were used by TWRA to develop three resource
management initiatives.
 The Tennessee GAP project, which is being carried out primarily by TWRA, is the
foundation of a multi-agency, long-term biodiversity program for Tennessee.
 GAP data have been used by the Tennessee Forestry Stewardship Program to help
develop a district program for nine conservation planning districts, outlining Best
Management Practices (BMPs) for biological conservation on private lands.
 GAP data are being used extensively by TWRA in the preparation of project
proposals to the North American Waterfowl Conservation Program. These proposals
require that biodiversity issues are addressed in specific detail. The use of GAP data on
occurrence of land cover types and terrestrial vertebrates has made this possible.
 The Wyoming Department of Fish and Game used GAP data to assist them in
transforming the Wildlife Observation System database into a spatially referenced
geographic information system.
 The Utah Division of Wildlife Resources and the Bear River Water Conservancy
District used the Utah GAP land cover map in a resource management assessment for
mitigating conflicts between a proposed groundwater withdrawal project and the
maintenance of an elk calving area in the Uinta Mountains.
 The Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, and
Sheik Safari International used the Utah GAP land cover map to identify critical elk
habitat. The environmental profile of these areas was then used to identify other similar
areas for elk habitat enhancement.
 The Utah Division of Wildlife Resources used the Utah GAP land cover map for a
rapid ecological assessment of the Echo Henefer Wildlife Management Area.
 The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife used GAP data to develop a
breeding bird atlas and an atlas of mammals of Washington State.
 The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife uses GAP data to operate an
integrated landscape management program.
 The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife uses GAP data from Eastern
Washington to assist with an innovative program that brings the forest products industry,
state agency biologists, non-government organizations, and tribal biologists together in
the field to jointly determine the appropriate management practices for any particular site
of concern (Timber, Fish & Wildlife Program).
 The Idaho Department of Fish and Game used GAP data to evaluate the impact from
expanded military training activities on public lands in Southern Idaho.
182
DRAFT 02/01/05
 The Idaho Department of Fish and Game uses GAP data for regional planning efforts
on a regular basis.
Federal Agency Applications
Some examples of applications of GAP data by federal agencies follow:
 GAP data are being supplied to all military installations in the Great Basin ecoregion
for integrated management of the natural resources. These installations constitute a very
large amount of land area. Much of it is of high value for native species.
 The Ouachita National Forest used the Arkansas GAP data to help them develop an
ecosystem management plan.
 The Wyoming GAP data were used by NASA to calibrate a model that predicts
vegetation types based on climate and soil variables.
 The potential contributions to biodiversity conservation of four different options
proposed for new wilderness designation in Idaho were quantified by the Idaho
Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit in cooperation with the Park Studies Unit.
 The potential contributions to biodiversity conservation of four different options
proposed for new national park designation in Idaho were quantified by the Idaho
Cooperative Park Studies Unit.
 The U.S. Forest Service in Booneville, Arkansas, used the Arkansas GAP data land
cover maps in a 3-dimensional presentation to provide the public with a visual
representation of the region and to enhance the public's involvement with the National
Forest planning process.
 The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service regularly uses the GAP data for Southern
California for habitat evaluation and management.
 The U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, and National Park Service are
using the GAP data for a wide variety of natural resource management operations in
Utah. For example, the entire Utah GAP database is directly linked with existing National
Park Service databases for use by National Parks.
 The Bureau of Land Management uses the Wyoming GAP data for managing the
Buffalo Resource Area.
 The U.S. Forest Service used the Utah GAP data to help assist them in evaluating
human-induced impacts to forested lands surrounding ski resorts in central Utah.
 The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in Delaware used GAP data to help identify
potential habitat for the federally endangered Delmarva fox squirrel. These maps were
displayed and served as a catalyst for bringing together people with a stake in the issue.
 The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service used the Indiana GAP data as part of a biological
assessment for the base closure of the Jefferson Proving Grounds and its conversion to a
National Wildlife Refuge. This 58,000-acre installation has restricted human access due
to unexploded ordinance and contains some of the highest-quality natural habitat in
Indiana.
 The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in Louisiana used GAP data to avoid conflict over
the designation of critical habitat of the federally endangered Louisiana black bear.
 The NOAA Coastal Marine Sanctuary in Washington State uses GAP data for an
educational display.
183
DRAFT 02/01/05
 In Washington and New Mexico, digital land cover maps have been distributed to all
National Forests.
 The U.S. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) in New Mexico is using a
GAP clustered imagery as a base for their land cover mapping activities.
 The Department of Defense is funding the development of an electronic
environmental information system for the Mojave ecoregion, which would use GAP data
as a foundation or base layer of information. The system will link 29 DoD installations to
a common source of environmental information.
184