GMY302 10202

advertisement
PLQ Incorporated
Page 1 of 2
Reason Narrative Written:
Death:
SAE:
Discontinuation due to adverse event:
Discontinuation due to laboratory abnormality:
Protocol:
CANCER PROTOCOL
Subject identifier:
10202
Subject demographics:
79-year-old white female
Treatment group:
CANCERX + dexamethasone
Date of first dose of study drug:
CANCERX: 16 Apr 2002
Dexamethasone: 19 Apr 2002
Date of last dose of study drug (study day):
CANCERX: 27 Jan 2003 (Day 287)
Dexamethasone: 24 Jan 2003 (Day 284)
Preferred term for adverse event:
Spinal compression fracture,
hydropneumothorax,
urinary tract infection,
sepsis methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus,
injection site infection
Narrative: Subject 10202 was diagnosed with multiple myeloma in Apr 1998. The subject previously
received treatment with cytoxan, vincristine, carmustine, cyclophosphamide, melphalan, prednisone,
vertebroplasty, and radiotherapy. The subject’s pertinent medical history included thoracic back pain,
recurrent urinary tract infections, cholelithiasis, depression, constipation, anemia, and allergies to penicillin
and sulfa.
On 15 May 2002 (Day 30; Cycle 2, day 2 of therapy), the subject was admitted to the hospital for
management of severe back pain. Earlier that day, she had fallen and immediately began having back pain
that radiated down her left side. An x-ray showed an L4 compression fracture, which was confirmed with a
computed tomography scan. The subject had some decreased sensation in the left foot but no other sensory
deficits. Her lungs had coarse bronchial sounds. The subject was treated with rofecoxib, morphine, and IV
fluids. The lumbar compression fracture was considered resolved with residual effects on 18 May 2002 (Day
33), and the subject was discharged.
Relevant concomitant medications for the event of spinal compression fracture included pantoprazole,
pamidronate, calcitonin, gabapentin, senna, famciclovir, epoetin alfa, ferrous sulfate, paroxetine, and
hydrocodone with acetaminophen.
On 19 Jun 2002 (Day 65; Cycle 3 of therapy), the subject presented to the emergency department with a
temperature of 38.9oC and complaints of headache and dizziness. A chest x-ray showed a large, left pleural
effusion with an air-fluid level suggestive of hydropneumothorax. The subject had not experienced any
recent trauma that could have caused a hydropneumothorax. On 20 Jun 2002, a chest x-ray showed 20%
pneumothorax with little change from the previous day. A computed tomography scan of the head,
performed as an assessment of the subject’s headaches, showed extensive lytic destruction in the calvarium
with opacification of the left frontal air cell and destruction of the anterior bony wall of the left frontal sinus.
The subject underwent ultrasound-guided, left-sided thoracentesis for removal of approximately 400 mL of
cloudy yellow fluid, which contained polymorphonuclear leukocytes (4+) and red blood cells (3+) but was
negative for pathological organisms. The subject received treatment with ketorolac, cefotaxime,
vancomycin, acetylcysteine, and hydrocodone. The subject was discharged on 23 Jun 2002, and she was
considered recovered from the hydropneumothorax on 01 Jul 2002 (Day 77). Study medication was
temporarily interrupted from 20 Jun to 08 Jul 2002 as a result of the event.
Last saved: 12 Jun 2003
PLQ Incorporated
Page 2 of 2
Relevant concomitant medications for the event of hydropneumothorax included oxycodone, calcitonin,
gabapentin, paroxetine, senna, famciclovir, ferrous sulfate, epoetin alfa, hydrocodone with acetaminophen,
pantoprazole, and pamidronate.
On 20 Nov 2002 (Day 219; 2 days after completing Cycle 9 therapy), the subject had poor oral intake,
nausea, and vomiting. On 23 Nov 2002 (Day 222; 5 days after completing Cycle 9 therapy), she was
admitted to the hospital due to intractable back pain, a temperature of 38.6 oC, and leukocytosis. Physical
examination revealed mild tenderness to palpation of the abdomen and thoracic spine as well as poor skin
turgor. Her WBC count was elevated (13,600/L) with 85% neutrophils. Her slightly cloudy urine had
WBCs present. Urine cultures grew Escherichia coli. The subject was diagnosed with urinary tract
infection, which was considered the cause of her back pain. She was treated with acetaminophen, morphine,
levofloxacin, and vancomycin. The urinary tract infection was considered resolved on 28 Nov 2002 (Day
227). The subject’s hospitalization was prolonged due to sepsis with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus
aureus, which was diagnosed on 26 Nov 2002 from blood cultures. The sepsis was treated successfully with
vancomycin. The methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection was considered resolved on
09 Dec 2002 (Day 238), and the subject was discharged on that day.
Relevant concomitant medications for the events of urinary tract infection and methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus sepsis included pamidronate, oxycodone, paroxetine, senna, famciclovir, ferrous
sulfate, gabapentin, pantoprazole, and hydrocodone with acetaminophen.
On 18 Dec 2002 (Day 247, Cycle 10), the subject was admitted to the hospital after developing a fever of
38.4oC, weakness, and clammy skin. At admission, the subject was pale and had a blood oxygen saturation
of 88% on room air. She was treated with 4 L/min of oxygen via nasal cannula. After blood cultures from
her central venous catheter were positive for Staphylococcus, the central venous catheter was replaced, and
the subject began treatment with cefotaxime, gentamicin, and vancomycin. The injection site infection
resolved and the subject was discharged on 23 Dec 2002 (Day 252). Infusion of CANCERX was interrupted
temporarily on 20 Dec 2002 while a new central venous catheter was inserted.
Relevant concomitant medications for the event of injection site infection included oxycodone, gabapentin,
paroxetine, senna, famciclovir, hydrocodone with acetaminophen, ferrous sulfate, triamcinolone,
acetaminophen, polyethylene glycol, prednisone, vancomycin, zoledronic acid, and pantoprazole.
In the opinion of the investigator, the spinal compression fracture was moderate (Grade 2), unlikely related to
CANCERX, and unlikely related to dexamethasone. The hydropneumothorax was considered moderate
(Grade 2), unlikely related to CANCERX, and unrelated to dexamethasone. In the opinion of the
investigator, the urinary tract infection, sepsis methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and injection site
infection were severe (Grade 3), unlikely related to CANCERX, and unlikely related to dexamethasone.
Last saved: 12 Jun 2003
Download